Searched hist:"46 d1efd8" (Results 1 – 6 of 6) sorted by relevance
| /openbmc/linux/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ |
| H A D | tx_tso.c | 46d1efd8 Thu Nov 17 04:52:36 CST 2016 Edward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com> sfc: remove Software TSO
It gives no advantage over GSO now that xmit_more exists. If we find
ourselves unable to handle a TSO skb (because our TXQ doesn't have a
TSOv2 context and the NIC doesn't support TSOv1), hand it back to GSO.
Also do that if the TSO handler fails with EINVAL for any other reason.
As Falcon-architecture NICs don't support any firmware-assisted TSO,
they no longer advertise TSO feature flags at all.
Signed-off-by: Edward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
46d1efd8 Thu Nov 17 04:52:36 CST 2016 Edward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com> sfc: remove Software TSO
It gives no advantage over GSO now that xmit_more exists. If we find
ourselves unable to handle a TSO skb (because our TXQ doesn't have a
TSOv2 context and the NIC doesn't support TSOv1), hand it back to GSO.
Also do that if the TSO handler fails with EINVAL for any other reason.
As Falcon-architecture NICs don't support any firmware-assisted TSO,
they no longer advertise TSO feature flags at all.
Signed-off-by: Edward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
| H A D | ethtool.c | 46d1efd8 Thu Nov 17 04:52:36 CST 2016 Edward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com> sfc: remove Software TSO
It gives no advantage over GSO now that xmit_more exists. If we find
ourselves unable to handle a TSO skb (because our TXQ doesn't have a
TSOv2 context and the NIC doesn't support TSOv1), hand it back to GSO.
Also do that if the TSO handler fails with EINVAL for any other reason.
As Falcon-architecture NICs don't support any firmware-assisted TSO,
they no longer advertise TSO feature flags at all.
Signed-off-by: Edward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
46d1efd8 Thu Nov 17 04:52:36 CST 2016 Edward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com> sfc: remove Software TSO
It gives no advantage over GSO now that xmit_more exists. If we find
ourselves unable to handle a TSO skb (because our TXQ doesn't have a
TSOv2 context and the NIC doesn't support TSOv1), hand it back to GSO.
Also do that if the TSO handler fails with EINVAL for any other reason.
As Falcon-architecture NICs don't support any firmware-assisted TSO,
they no longer advertise TSO feature flags at all.
Signed-off-by: Edward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
| H A D | tx.c | 46d1efd8 Thu Nov 17 04:52:36 CST 2016 Edward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com> sfc: remove Software TSO
It gives no advantage over GSO now that xmit_more exists. If we find
ourselves unable to handle a TSO skb (because our TXQ doesn't have a
TSOv2 context and the NIC doesn't support TSOv1), hand it back to GSO.
Also do that if the TSO handler fails with EINVAL for any other reason.
As Falcon-architecture NICs don't support any firmware-assisted TSO,
they no longer advertise TSO feature flags at all.
Signed-off-by: Edward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
46d1efd8 Thu Nov 17 04:52:36 CST 2016 Edward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com> sfc: remove Software TSO
It gives no advantage over GSO now that xmit_more exists. If we find
ourselves unable to handle a TSO skb (because our TXQ doesn't have a
TSOv2 context and the NIC doesn't support TSOv1), hand it back to GSO.
Also do that if the TSO handler fails with EINVAL for any other reason.
As Falcon-architecture NICs don't support any firmware-assisted TSO,
they no longer advertise TSO feature flags at all.
Signed-off-by: Edward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
| H A D | net_driver.h | 46d1efd8 Thu Nov 17 04:52:36 CST 2016 Edward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com> sfc: remove Software TSO
It gives no advantage over GSO now that xmit_more exists. If we find
ourselves unable to handle a TSO skb (because our TXQ doesn't have a
TSOv2 context and the NIC doesn't support TSOv1), hand it back to GSO.
Also do that if the TSO handler fails with EINVAL for any other reason.
As Falcon-architecture NICs don't support any firmware-assisted TSO,
they no longer advertise TSO feature flags at all.
Signed-off-by: Edward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
46d1efd8 Thu Nov 17 04:52:36 CST 2016 Edward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com> sfc: remove Software TSO
It gives no advantage over GSO now that xmit_more exists. If we find
ourselves unable to handle a TSO skb (because our TXQ doesn't have a
TSOv2 context and the NIC doesn't support TSOv1), hand it back to GSO.
Also do that if the TSO handler fails with EINVAL for any other reason.
As Falcon-architecture NICs don't support any firmware-assisted TSO,
they no longer advertise TSO feature flags at all.
Signed-off-by: Edward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
| H A D | ef10.c | 46d1efd8 Thu Nov 17 04:52:36 CST 2016 Edward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com> sfc: remove Software TSO
It gives no advantage over GSO now that xmit_more exists. If we find
ourselves unable to handle a TSO skb (because our TXQ doesn't have a
TSOv2 context and the NIC doesn't support TSOv1), hand it back to GSO.
Also do that if the TSO handler fails with EINVAL for any other reason.
As Falcon-architecture NICs don't support any firmware-assisted TSO,
they no longer advertise TSO feature flags at all.
Signed-off-by: Edward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
46d1efd8 Thu Nov 17 04:52:36 CST 2016 Edward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com> sfc: remove Software TSO
It gives no advantage over GSO now that xmit_more exists. If we find
ourselves unable to handle a TSO skb (because our TXQ doesn't have a
TSOv2 context and the NIC doesn't support TSOv1), hand it back to GSO.
Also do that if the TSO handler fails with EINVAL for any other reason.
As Falcon-architecture NICs don't support any firmware-assisted TSO,
they no longer advertise TSO feature flags at all.
Signed-off-by: Edward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
| H A D | efx.c | 46d1efd8 Thu Nov 17 04:52:36 CST 2016 Edward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com> sfc: remove Software TSO
It gives no advantage over GSO now that xmit_more exists. If we find
ourselves unable to handle a TSO skb (because our TXQ doesn't have a
TSOv2 context and the NIC doesn't support TSOv1), hand it back to GSO.
Also do that if the TSO handler fails with EINVAL for any other reason.
As Falcon-architecture NICs don't support any firmware-assisted TSO,
they no longer advertise TSO feature flags at all.
Signed-off-by: Edward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
46d1efd8 Thu Nov 17 04:52:36 CST 2016 Edward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com> sfc: remove Software TSO
It gives no advantage over GSO now that xmit_more exists. If we find
ourselves unable to handle a TSO skb (because our TXQ doesn't have a
TSOv2 context and the NIC doesn't support TSOv1), hand it back to GSO.
Also do that if the TSO handler fails with EINVAL for any other reason.
As Falcon-architecture NICs don't support any firmware-assisted TSO,
they no longer advertise TSO feature flags at all.
Signed-off-by: Edward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|