Searched hist:"28232 a43" (Results 1 – 3 of 3) sorted by relevance
| /openbmc/linux/arch/arm64/kvm/ |
| H A D | vgic-sys-reg-v3.c | 28232a43 Sat May 20 07:12:34 CDT 2017 Christoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org> KVM: arm/arm64: Fix isues with GICv2 on GICv3 migration
We have been a little loose with our intermediate VMCR representation
where we had a 'ctlr' field, but we failed to differentiate between the
GICv2 GICC_CTLR and ICC_CTLR_EL1 layouts, and therefore ended up mapping
the wrong bits into the individual fields of the ICH_VMCR_EL2 when
emulating a GICv2 on a GICv3 system.
Fix this by using explicit fields for the VMCR bits instead.
Cc: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Reported-by: wanghaibin <wanghaibin.wang@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Tested-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
28232a43 Sat May 20 07:12:34 CDT 2017 Christoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org> KVM: arm/arm64: Fix isues with GICv2 on GICv3 migration
We have been a little loose with our intermediate VMCR representation
where we had a 'ctlr' field, but we failed to differentiate between the
GICv2 GICC_CTLR and ICC_CTLR_EL1 layouts, and therefore ended up mapping
the wrong bits into the individual fields of the ICH_VMCR_EL2 when
emulating a GICv2 on a GICv3 system.
Fix this by using explicit fields for the VMCR bits instead.
Cc: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Reported-by: wanghaibin <wanghaibin.wang@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Tested-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
|
| /openbmc/linux/include/linux/irqchip/ |
| H A D | arm-gic.h | 28232a43 Sat May 20 07:12:34 CDT 2017 Christoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org> KVM: arm/arm64: Fix isues with GICv2 on GICv3 migration
We have been a little loose with our intermediate VMCR representation
where we had a 'ctlr' field, but we failed to differentiate between the
GICv2 GICC_CTLR and ICC_CTLR_EL1 layouts, and therefore ended up mapping
the wrong bits into the individual fields of the ICH_VMCR_EL2 when
emulating a GICv2 on a GICv3 system.
Fix this by using explicit fields for the VMCR bits instead.
Cc: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Reported-by: wanghaibin <wanghaibin.wang@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Tested-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
28232a43 Sat May 20 07:12:34 CDT 2017 Christoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org> KVM: arm/arm64: Fix isues with GICv2 on GICv3 migration
We have been a little loose with our intermediate VMCR representation
where we had a 'ctlr' field, but we failed to differentiate between the
GICv2 GICC_CTLR and ICC_CTLR_EL1 layouts, and therefore ended up mapping
the wrong bits into the individual fields of the ICH_VMCR_EL2 when
emulating a GICv2 on a GICv3 system.
Fix this by using explicit fields for the VMCR bits instead.
Cc: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Reported-by: wanghaibin <wanghaibin.wang@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Tested-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
|
| H A D | arm-gic-v3.h | 28232a43 Sat May 20 07:12:34 CDT 2017 Christoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org> KVM: arm/arm64: Fix isues with GICv2 on GICv3 migration
We have been a little loose with our intermediate VMCR representation
where we had a 'ctlr' field, but we failed to differentiate between the
GICv2 GICC_CTLR and ICC_CTLR_EL1 layouts, and therefore ended up mapping
the wrong bits into the individual fields of the ICH_VMCR_EL2 when
emulating a GICv2 on a GICv3 system.
Fix this by using explicit fields for the VMCR bits instead.
Cc: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Reported-by: wanghaibin <wanghaibin.wang@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Tested-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
28232a43 Sat May 20 07:12:34 CDT 2017 Christoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org> KVM: arm/arm64: Fix isues with GICv2 on GICv3 migration
We have been a little loose with our intermediate VMCR representation
where we had a 'ctlr' field, but we failed to differentiate between the
GICv2 GICC_CTLR and ICC_CTLR_EL1 layouts, and therefore ended up mapping
the wrong bits into the individual fields of the ICH_VMCR_EL2 when
emulating a GICv2 on a GICv3 system.
Fix this by using explicit fields for the VMCR bits instead.
Cc: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Reported-by: wanghaibin <wanghaibin.wang@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Tested-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
|