| /openbmc/linux/fs/btrfs/ |
| H A D | relocation.c | c171edd5 Wed Jun 17 04:10:42 CDT 2020 Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> btrfs: remove hole check in prealloc_file_extent_cluster
Extents in the extent cluster are guaranteed to be contiguous as such
the hole check inside the loop can never trigger. In fact this check was
never functional since it was added in 18513091af94 ("btrfs: update
btrfs_space_info's bytes_may_use timely") which came after the commit
introducing clustered/contiguous extents 0257bb82d21b ("Btrfs: relocate
file extents in clusters").
Let's just remove it as it adds noise to the source.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
18513091 Mon Jul 25 02:51:40 CDT 2016 Wang Xiaoguang <wangxg.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> btrfs: update btrfs_space_info's bytes_may_use timely
This patch can fix some false ENOSPC errors, below test script can
reproduce one false ENOSPC error:
#!/bin/bash
dd if=/dev/zero of=fs.img bs=$((1024*1024)) count=128
dev=$(losetup --show -f fs.img)
mkfs.btrfs -f -M $dev
mkdir /tmp/mntpoint
mount $dev /tmp/mntpoint
cd /tmp/mntpoint
xfs_io -f -c "falloc 0 $((64*1024*1024))" testfile
Above script will fail for ENOSPC reason, but indeed fs still has free
space to satisfy this request. Please see call graph:
btrfs_fallocate()
|-> btrfs_alloc_data_chunk_ondemand()
| bytes_may_use += 64M
|-> btrfs_prealloc_file_range()
|-> btrfs_reserve_extent()
|-> btrfs_add_reserved_bytes()
| alloc_type is RESERVE_ALLOC_NO_ACCOUNT, so it does not
| change bytes_may_use, and bytes_reserved += 64M. Now
| bytes_may_use + bytes_reserved == 128M, which is greater
| than btrfs_space_info's total_bytes, false enospc occurs.
| Note, the bytes_may_use decrease operation will be done in
| end of btrfs_fallocate(), which is too late.
Here is another simple case for buffered write:
CPU 1 | CPU 2
|
|-> cow_file_range() |-> __btrfs_buffered_write()
|-> btrfs_reserve_extent() | |
| | |
| | |
| ..... | |-> btrfs_check_data_free_space()
| |
| |
|-> extent_clear_unlock_delalloc() |
In CPU 1, btrfs_reserve_extent()->find_free_extent()->
btrfs_add_reserved_bytes() do not decrease bytes_may_use, the decrease
operation will be delayed to be done in extent_clear_unlock_delalloc().
Assume in this case, btrfs_reserve_extent() reserved 128MB data, CPU2's
btrfs_check_data_free_space() tries to reserve 100MB data space.
If
100MB > data_sinfo->total_bytes - data_sinfo->bytes_used -
data_sinfo->bytes_reserved - data_sinfo->bytes_pinned -
data_sinfo->bytes_readonly - data_sinfo->bytes_may_use
btrfs_check_data_free_space() will try to allcate new data chunk or call
btrfs_start_delalloc_roots(), or commit current transaction in order to
reserve some free space, obviously a lot of work. But indeed it's not
necessary as long as decreasing bytes_may_use timely, we still have
free space, decreasing 128M from bytes_may_use.
To fix this issue, this patch chooses to update bytes_may_use for both
data and metadata in btrfs_add_reserved_bytes(). For compress path, real
extent length may not be equal to file content length, so introduce a
ram_bytes argument for btrfs_reserve_extent(), find_free_extent() and
btrfs_add_reserved_bytes(), it's becasue bytes_may_use is increased by
file content length. Then compress path can update bytes_may_use
correctly. Also now we can discard RESERVE_ALLOC_NO_ACCOUNT, RESERVE_ALLOC
and RESERVE_FREE.
As we know, usually EXTENT_DO_ACCOUNTING is used for error path. In
run_delalloc_nocow(), for inode marked as NODATACOW or extent marked as
PREALLOC, we also need to update bytes_may_use, but can not pass
EXTENT_DO_ACCOUNTING, because it also clears metadata reservation, so
here we introduce EXTENT_CLEAR_DATA_RESV flag to indicate btrfs_clear_bit_hook()
to update btrfs_space_info's bytes_may_use.
Meanwhile __btrfs_prealloc_file_range() will call
btrfs_free_reserved_data_space() internally for both sucessful and failed
path, btrfs_prealloc_file_range()'s callers does not need to call
btrfs_free_reserved_data_space() any more.
Signed-off-by: Wang Xiaoguang <wangxg.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
c171edd5 Wed Jun 17 04:10:42 CDT 2020 Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> btrfs: remove hole check in prealloc_file_extent_cluster
Extents in the extent cluster are guaranteed to be contiguous as such
the hole check inside the loop can never trigger. In fact this check was
never functional since it was added in 18513091af94 ("btrfs: update
btrfs_space_info's bytes_may_use timely") which came after the commit
introducing clustered/contiguous extents 0257bb82d21b ("Btrfs: relocate
file extents in clusters").
Let's just remove it as it adds noise to the source.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
18513091 Mon Jul 25 02:51:40 CDT 2016 Wang Xiaoguang <wangxg.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> btrfs: update btrfs_space_info's bytes_may_use timely
This patch can fix some false ENOSPC errors, below test script can
reproduce one false ENOSPC error:
#!/bin/bash
dd if=/dev/zero of=fs.img bs=$((1024*1024)) count=128
dev=$(losetup --show -f fs.img)
mkfs.btrfs -f -M $dev
mkdir /tmp/mntpoint
mount $dev /tmp/mntpoint
cd /tmp/mntpoint
xfs_io -f -c "falloc 0 $((64*1024*1024))" testfile
Above script will fail for ENOSPC reason, but indeed fs still has free
space to satisfy this request. Please see call graph:
btrfs_fallocate()
|-> btrfs_alloc_data_chunk_ondemand()
| bytes_may_use += 64M
|-> btrfs_prealloc_file_range()
|-> btrfs_reserve_extent()
|-> btrfs_add_reserved_bytes()
| alloc_type is RESERVE_ALLOC_NO_ACCOUNT, so it does not
| change bytes_may_use, and bytes_reserved += 64M. Now
| bytes_may_use + bytes_reserved == 128M, which is greater
| than btrfs_space_info's total_bytes, false enospc occurs.
| Note, the bytes_may_use decrease operation will be done in
| end of btrfs_fallocate(), which is too late.
Here is another simple case for buffered write:
CPU 1 | CPU 2
|
|-> cow_file_range() |-> __btrfs_buffered_write()
|-> btrfs_reserve_extent() | |
| | |
| | |
| ..... | |-> btrfs_check_data_free_space()
| |
| |
|-> extent_clear_unlock_delalloc() |
In CPU 1, btrfs_reserve_extent()->find_free_extent()->
btrfs_add_reserved_bytes() do not decrease bytes_may_use, the decrease
operation will be delayed to be done in extent_clear_unlock_delalloc().
Assume in this case, btrfs_reserve_extent() reserved 128MB data, CPU2's
btrfs_check_data_free_space() tries to reserve 100MB data space.
If
100MB > data_sinfo->total_bytes - data_sinfo->bytes_used -
data_sinfo->bytes_reserved - data_sinfo->bytes_pinned -
data_sinfo->bytes_readonly - data_sinfo->bytes_may_use
btrfs_check_data_free_space() will try to allcate new data chunk or call
btrfs_start_delalloc_roots(), or commit current transaction in order to
reserve some free space, obviously a lot of work. But indeed it's not
necessary as long as decreasing bytes_may_use timely, we still have
free space, decreasing 128M from bytes_may_use.
To fix this issue, this patch chooses to update bytes_may_use for both
data and metadata in btrfs_add_reserved_bytes(). For compress path, real
extent length may not be equal to file content length, so introduce a
ram_bytes argument for btrfs_reserve_extent(), find_free_extent() and
btrfs_add_reserved_bytes(), it's becasue bytes_may_use is increased by
file content length. Then compress path can update bytes_may_use
correctly. Also now we can discard RESERVE_ALLOC_NO_ACCOUNT, RESERVE_ALLOC
and RESERVE_FREE.
As we know, usually EXTENT_DO_ACCOUNTING is used for error path. In
run_delalloc_nocow(), for inode marked as NODATACOW or extent marked as
PREALLOC, we also need to update bytes_may_use, but can not pass
EXTENT_DO_ACCOUNTING, because it also clears metadata reservation, so
here we introduce EXTENT_CLEAR_DATA_RESV flag to indicate btrfs_clear_bit_hook()
to update btrfs_space_info's bytes_may_use.
Meanwhile __btrfs_prealloc_file_range() will call
btrfs_free_reserved_data_space() internally for both sucessful and failed
path, btrfs_prealloc_file_range()'s callers does not need to call
btrfs_free_reserved_data_space() any more.
Signed-off-by: Wang Xiaoguang <wangxg.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
|
| H A D | extent_io.h | 18513091 Mon Jul 25 02:51:40 CDT 2016 Wang Xiaoguang <wangxg.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> btrfs: update btrfs_space_info's bytes_may_use timely
This patch can fix some false ENOSPC errors, below test script can
reproduce one false ENOSPC error:
#!/bin/bash
dd if=/dev/zero of=fs.img bs=$((1024*1024)) count=128
dev=$(losetup --show -f fs.img)
mkfs.btrfs -f -M $dev
mkdir /tmp/mntpoint
mount $dev /tmp/mntpoint
cd /tmp/mntpoint
xfs_io -f -c "falloc 0 $((64*1024*1024))" testfile
Above script will fail for ENOSPC reason, but indeed fs still has free
space to satisfy this request. Please see call graph:
btrfs_fallocate()
|-> btrfs_alloc_data_chunk_ondemand()
| bytes_may_use += 64M
|-> btrfs_prealloc_file_range()
|-> btrfs_reserve_extent()
|-> btrfs_add_reserved_bytes()
| alloc_type is RESERVE_ALLOC_NO_ACCOUNT, so it does not
| change bytes_may_use, and bytes_reserved += 64M. Now
| bytes_may_use + bytes_reserved == 128M, which is greater
| than btrfs_space_info's total_bytes, false enospc occurs.
| Note, the bytes_may_use decrease operation will be done in
| end of btrfs_fallocate(), which is too late.
Here is another simple case for buffered write:
CPU 1 | CPU 2
|
|-> cow_file_range() |-> __btrfs_buffered_write()
|-> btrfs_reserve_extent() | |
| | |
| | |
| ..... | |-> btrfs_check_data_free_space()
| |
| |
|-> extent_clear_unlock_delalloc() |
In CPU 1, btrfs_reserve_extent()->find_free_extent()->
btrfs_add_reserved_bytes() do not decrease bytes_may_use, the decrease
operation will be delayed to be done in extent_clear_unlock_delalloc().
Assume in this case, btrfs_reserve_extent() reserved 128MB data, CPU2's
btrfs_check_data_free_space() tries to reserve 100MB data space.
If
100MB > data_sinfo->total_bytes - data_sinfo->bytes_used -
data_sinfo->bytes_reserved - data_sinfo->bytes_pinned -
data_sinfo->bytes_readonly - data_sinfo->bytes_may_use
btrfs_check_data_free_space() will try to allcate new data chunk or call
btrfs_start_delalloc_roots(), or commit current transaction in order to
reserve some free space, obviously a lot of work. But indeed it's not
necessary as long as decreasing bytes_may_use timely, we still have
free space, decreasing 128M from bytes_may_use.
To fix this issue, this patch chooses to update bytes_may_use for both
data and metadata in btrfs_add_reserved_bytes(). For compress path, real
extent length may not be equal to file content length, so introduce a
ram_bytes argument for btrfs_reserve_extent(), find_free_extent() and
btrfs_add_reserved_bytes(), it's becasue bytes_may_use is increased by
file content length. Then compress path can update bytes_may_use
correctly. Also now we can discard RESERVE_ALLOC_NO_ACCOUNT, RESERVE_ALLOC
and RESERVE_FREE.
As we know, usually EXTENT_DO_ACCOUNTING is used for error path. In
run_delalloc_nocow(), for inode marked as NODATACOW or extent marked as
PREALLOC, we also need to update bytes_may_use, but can not pass
EXTENT_DO_ACCOUNTING, because it also clears metadata reservation, so
here we introduce EXTENT_CLEAR_DATA_RESV flag to indicate btrfs_clear_bit_hook()
to update btrfs_space_info's bytes_may_use.
Meanwhile __btrfs_prealloc_file_range() will call
btrfs_free_reserved_data_space() internally for both sucessful and failed
path, btrfs_prealloc_file_range()'s callers does not need to call
btrfs_free_reserved_data_space() any more.
Signed-off-by: Wang Xiaoguang <wangxg.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
18513091 Mon Jul 25 02:51:40 CDT 2016 Wang Xiaoguang <wangxg.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> btrfs: update btrfs_space_info's bytes_may_use timely
This patch can fix some false ENOSPC errors, below test script can
reproduce one false ENOSPC error:
#!/bin/bash
dd if=/dev/zero of=fs.img bs=$((1024*1024)) count=128
dev=$(losetup --show -f fs.img)
mkfs.btrfs -f -M $dev
mkdir /tmp/mntpoint
mount $dev /tmp/mntpoint
cd /tmp/mntpoint
xfs_io -f -c "falloc 0 $((64*1024*1024))" testfile
Above script will fail for ENOSPC reason, but indeed fs still has free
space to satisfy this request. Please see call graph:
btrfs_fallocate()
|-> btrfs_alloc_data_chunk_ondemand()
| bytes_may_use += 64M
|-> btrfs_prealloc_file_range()
|-> btrfs_reserve_extent()
|-> btrfs_add_reserved_bytes()
| alloc_type is RESERVE_ALLOC_NO_ACCOUNT, so it does not
| change bytes_may_use, and bytes_reserved += 64M. Now
| bytes_may_use + bytes_reserved == 128M, which is greater
| than btrfs_space_info's total_bytes, false enospc occurs.
| Note, the bytes_may_use decrease operation will be done in
| end of btrfs_fallocate(), which is too late.
Here is another simple case for buffered write:
CPU 1 | CPU 2
|
|-> cow_file_range() |-> __btrfs_buffered_write()
|-> btrfs_reserve_extent() | |
| | |
| | |
| ..... | |-> btrfs_check_data_free_space()
| |
| |
|-> extent_clear_unlock_delalloc() |
In CPU 1, btrfs_reserve_extent()->find_free_extent()->
btrfs_add_reserved_bytes() do not decrease bytes_may_use, the decrease
operation will be delayed to be done in extent_clear_unlock_delalloc().
Assume in this case, btrfs_reserve_extent() reserved 128MB data, CPU2's
btrfs_check_data_free_space() tries to reserve 100MB data space.
If
100MB > data_sinfo->total_bytes - data_sinfo->bytes_used -
data_sinfo->bytes_reserved - data_sinfo->bytes_pinned -
data_sinfo->bytes_readonly - data_sinfo->bytes_may_use
btrfs_check_data_free_space() will try to allcate new data chunk or call
btrfs_start_delalloc_roots(), or commit current transaction in order to
reserve some free space, obviously a lot of work. But indeed it's not
necessary as long as decreasing bytes_may_use timely, we still have
free space, decreasing 128M from bytes_may_use.
To fix this issue, this patch chooses to update bytes_may_use for both
data and metadata in btrfs_add_reserved_bytes(). For compress path, real
extent length may not be equal to file content length, so introduce a
ram_bytes argument for btrfs_reserve_extent(), find_free_extent() and
btrfs_add_reserved_bytes(), it's becasue bytes_may_use is increased by
file content length. Then compress path can update bytes_may_use
correctly. Also now we can discard RESERVE_ALLOC_NO_ACCOUNT, RESERVE_ALLOC
and RESERVE_FREE.
As we know, usually EXTENT_DO_ACCOUNTING is used for error path. In
run_delalloc_nocow(), for inode marked as NODATACOW or extent marked as
PREALLOC, we also need to update bytes_may_use, but can not pass
EXTENT_DO_ACCOUNTING, because it also clears metadata reservation, so
here we introduce EXTENT_CLEAR_DATA_RESV flag to indicate btrfs_clear_bit_hook()
to update btrfs_space_info's bytes_may_use.
Meanwhile __btrfs_prealloc_file_range() will call
btrfs_free_reserved_data_space() internally for both sucessful and failed
path, btrfs_prealloc_file_range()'s callers does not need to call
btrfs_free_reserved_data_space() any more.
Signed-off-by: Wang Xiaoguang <wangxg.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
|
| H A D | file.c | 39ad3173 Mon Mar 25 22:56:11 CDT 2019 Robbie Ko <robbieko@synology.com> Btrfs: fix data bytes_may_use underflow with fallocate due to failed quota reserve
When doing fallocate, we first add the range to the reserve_list and
then reserve the quota. If quota reservation fails, we'll release all
reserved parts of reserve_list.
However, cur_offset is not updated to indicate that this range is
already been inserted into the list. Therefore, the same range is freed
twice. Once at list_for_each_entry loop, and once at the end of the
function. This will result in WARN_ON on bytes_may_use when we free the
remaining space.
At the end, under the 'out' label we have a call to:
btrfs_free_reserved_data_space(inode, data_reserved, alloc_start, alloc_end - cur_offset);
The start offset, third argument, should be cur_offset.
Everything from alloc_start to cur_offset was freed by the
list_for_each_entry_safe_loop.
Fixes: 18513091af94 ("btrfs: update btrfs_space_info's bytes_may_use timely")
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Robbie Ko <robbieko@synology.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
18513091 Mon Jul 25 02:51:40 CDT 2016 Wang Xiaoguang <wangxg.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> btrfs: update btrfs_space_info's bytes_may_use timely
This patch can fix some false ENOSPC errors, below test script can
reproduce one false ENOSPC error:
#!/bin/bash
dd if=/dev/zero of=fs.img bs=$((1024*1024)) count=128
dev=$(losetup --show -f fs.img)
mkfs.btrfs -f -M $dev
mkdir /tmp/mntpoint
mount $dev /tmp/mntpoint
cd /tmp/mntpoint
xfs_io -f -c "falloc 0 $((64*1024*1024))" testfile
Above script will fail for ENOSPC reason, but indeed fs still has free
space to satisfy this request. Please see call graph:
btrfs_fallocate()
|-> btrfs_alloc_data_chunk_ondemand()
| bytes_may_use += 64M
|-> btrfs_prealloc_file_range()
|-> btrfs_reserve_extent()
|-> btrfs_add_reserved_bytes()
| alloc_type is RESERVE_ALLOC_NO_ACCOUNT, so it does not
| change bytes_may_use, and bytes_reserved += 64M. Now
| bytes_may_use + bytes_reserved == 128M, which is greater
| than btrfs_space_info's total_bytes, false enospc occurs.
| Note, the bytes_may_use decrease operation will be done in
| end of btrfs_fallocate(), which is too late.
Here is another simple case for buffered write:
CPU 1 | CPU 2
|
|-> cow_file_range() |-> __btrfs_buffered_write()
|-> btrfs_reserve_extent() | |
| | |
| | |
| ..... | |-> btrfs_check_data_free_space()
| |
| |
|-> extent_clear_unlock_delalloc() |
In CPU 1, btrfs_reserve_extent()->find_free_extent()->
btrfs_add_reserved_bytes() do not decrease bytes_may_use, the decrease
operation will be delayed to be done in extent_clear_unlock_delalloc().
Assume in this case, btrfs_reserve_extent() reserved 128MB data, CPU2's
btrfs_check_data_free_space() tries to reserve 100MB data space.
If
100MB > data_sinfo->total_bytes - data_sinfo->bytes_used -
data_sinfo->bytes_reserved - data_sinfo->bytes_pinned -
data_sinfo->bytes_readonly - data_sinfo->bytes_may_use
btrfs_check_data_free_space() will try to allcate new data chunk or call
btrfs_start_delalloc_roots(), or commit current transaction in order to
reserve some free space, obviously a lot of work. But indeed it's not
necessary as long as decreasing bytes_may_use timely, we still have
free space, decreasing 128M from bytes_may_use.
To fix this issue, this patch chooses to update bytes_may_use for both
data and metadata in btrfs_add_reserved_bytes(). For compress path, real
extent length may not be equal to file content length, so introduce a
ram_bytes argument for btrfs_reserve_extent(), find_free_extent() and
btrfs_add_reserved_bytes(), it's becasue bytes_may_use is increased by
file content length. Then compress path can update bytes_may_use
correctly. Also now we can discard RESERVE_ALLOC_NO_ACCOUNT, RESERVE_ALLOC
and RESERVE_FREE.
As we know, usually EXTENT_DO_ACCOUNTING is used for error path. In
run_delalloc_nocow(), for inode marked as NODATACOW or extent marked as
PREALLOC, we also need to update bytes_may_use, but can not pass
EXTENT_DO_ACCOUNTING, because it also clears metadata reservation, so
here we introduce EXTENT_CLEAR_DATA_RESV flag to indicate btrfs_clear_bit_hook()
to update btrfs_space_info's bytes_may_use.
Meanwhile __btrfs_prealloc_file_range() will call
btrfs_free_reserved_data_space() internally for both sucessful and failed
path, btrfs_prealloc_file_range()'s callers does not need to call
btrfs_free_reserved_data_space() any more.
Signed-off-by: Wang Xiaoguang <wangxg.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
39ad3173 Mon Mar 25 22:56:11 CDT 2019 Robbie Ko <robbieko@synology.com> Btrfs: fix data bytes_may_use underflow with fallocate due to failed quota reserve
When doing fallocate, we first add the range to the reserve_list and
then reserve the quota. If quota reservation fails, we'll release all
reserved parts of reserve_list.
However, cur_offset is not updated to indicate that this range is
already been inserted into the list. Therefore, the same range is freed
twice. Once at list_for_each_entry loop, and once at the end of the
function. This will result in WARN_ON on bytes_may_use when we free the
remaining space.
At the end, under the 'out' label we have a call to:
btrfs_free_reserved_data_space(inode, data_reserved, alloc_start, alloc_end - cur_offset);
The start offset, third argument, should be cur_offset.
Everything from alloc_start to cur_offset was freed by the
list_for_each_entry_safe_loop.
Fixes: 18513091af94 ("btrfs: update btrfs_space_info's bytes_may_use timely")
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Robbie Ko <robbieko@synology.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
18513091 Mon Jul 25 02:51:40 CDT 2016 Wang Xiaoguang <wangxg.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> btrfs: update btrfs_space_info's bytes_may_use timely
This patch can fix some false ENOSPC errors, below test script can
reproduce one false ENOSPC error:
#!/bin/bash
dd if=/dev/zero of=fs.img bs=$((1024*1024)) count=128
dev=$(losetup --show -f fs.img)
mkfs.btrfs -f -M $dev
mkdir /tmp/mntpoint
mount $dev /tmp/mntpoint
cd /tmp/mntpoint
xfs_io -f -c "falloc 0 $((64*1024*1024))" testfile
Above script will fail for ENOSPC reason, but indeed fs still has free
space to satisfy this request. Please see call graph:
btrfs_fallocate()
|-> btrfs_alloc_data_chunk_ondemand()
| bytes_may_use += 64M
|-> btrfs_prealloc_file_range()
|-> btrfs_reserve_extent()
|-> btrfs_add_reserved_bytes()
| alloc_type is RESERVE_ALLOC_NO_ACCOUNT, so it does not
| change bytes_may_use, and bytes_reserved += 64M. Now
| bytes_may_use + bytes_reserved == 128M, which is greater
| than btrfs_space_info's total_bytes, false enospc occurs.
| Note, the bytes_may_use decrease operation will be done in
| end of btrfs_fallocate(), which is too late.
Here is another simple case for buffered write:
CPU 1 | CPU 2
|
|-> cow_file_range() |-> __btrfs_buffered_write()
|-> btrfs_reserve_extent() | |
| | |
| | |
| ..... | |-> btrfs_check_data_free_space()
| |
| |
|-> extent_clear_unlock_delalloc() |
In CPU 1, btrfs_reserve_extent()->find_free_extent()->
btrfs_add_reserved_bytes() do not decrease bytes_may_use, the decrease
operation will be delayed to be done in extent_clear_unlock_delalloc().
Assume in this case, btrfs_reserve_extent() reserved 128MB data, CPU2's
btrfs_check_data_free_space() tries to reserve 100MB data space.
If
100MB > data_sinfo->total_bytes - data_sinfo->bytes_used -
data_sinfo->bytes_reserved - data_sinfo->bytes_pinned -
data_sinfo->bytes_readonly - data_sinfo->bytes_may_use
btrfs_check_data_free_space() will try to allcate new data chunk or call
btrfs_start_delalloc_roots(), or commit current transaction in order to
reserve some free space, obviously a lot of work. But indeed it's not
necessary as long as decreasing bytes_may_use timely, we still have
free space, decreasing 128M from bytes_may_use.
To fix this issue, this patch chooses to update bytes_may_use for both
data and metadata in btrfs_add_reserved_bytes(). For compress path, real
extent length may not be equal to file content length, so introduce a
ram_bytes argument for btrfs_reserve_extent(), find_free_extent() and
btrfs_add_reserved_bytes(), it's becasue bytes_may_use is increased by
file content length. Then compress path can update bytes_may_use
correctly. Also now we can discard RESERVE_ALLOC_NO_ACCOUNT, RESERVE_ALLOC
and RESERVE_FREE.
As we know, usually EXTENT_DO_ACCOUNTING is used for error path. In
run_delalloc_nocow(), for inode marked as NODATACOW or extent marked as
PREALLOC, we also need to update bytes_may_use, but can not pass
EXTENT_DO_ACCOUNTING, because it also clears metadata reservation, so
here we introduce EXTENT_CLEAR_DATA_RESV flag to indicate btrfs_clear_bit_hook()
to update btrfs_space_info's bytes_may_use.
Meanwhile __btrfs_prealloc_file_range() will call
btrfs_free_reserved_data_space() internally for both sucessful and failed
path, btrfs_prealloc_file_range()'s callers does not need to call
btrfs_free_reserved_data_space() any more.
Signed-off-by: Wang Xiaoguang <wangxg.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
|
| H A D | extent-tree.c | 6aadd9eb Tue Sep 04 20:55:27 CDT 2018 Liu Bo <bo.liu@linux.alibaba.com> Btrfs: remove confusing tracepoint in btrfs_add_reserved_bytes
Here we're not releasing any space, but transferring bytes from
->bytes_may_use to ->bytes_reserved. The last change to the code in
commit 18513091af9483ba8 ("btrfs: update btrfs_space_info's
bytes_may_use timely") removed a conditional tracepoint and the logic
changed too but the tracepiont remained.
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.liu@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[ update changelog ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
18513091 Mon Jul 25 02:51:40 CDT 2016 Wang Xiaoguang <wangxg.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> btrfs: update btrfs_space_info's bytes_may_use timely
This patch can fix some false ENOSPC errors, below test script can
reproduce one false ENOSPC error:
#!/bin/bash
dd if=/dev/zero of=fs.img bs=$((1024*1024)) count=128
dev=$(losetup --show -f fs.img)
mkfs.btrfs -f -M $dev
mkdir /tmp/mntpoint
mount $dev /tmp/mntpoint
cd /tmp/mntpoint
xfs_io -f -c "falloc 0 $((64*1024*1024))" testfile
Above script will fail for ENOSPC reason, but indeed fs still has free
space to satisfy this request. Please see call graph:
btrfs_fallocate()
|-> btrfs_alloc_data_chunk_ondemand()
| bytes_may_use += 64M
|-> btrfs_prealloc_file_range()
|-> btrfs_reserve_extent()
|-> btrfs_add_reserved_bytes()
| alloc_type is RESERVE_ALLOC_NO_ACCOUNT, so it does not
| change bytes_may_use, and bytes_reserved += 64M. Now
| bytes_may_use + bytes_reserved == 128M, which is greater
| than btrfs_space_info's total_bytes, false enospc occurs.
| Note, the bytes_may_use decrease operation will be done in
| end of btrfs_fallocate(), which is too late.
Here is another simple case for buffered write:
CPU 1 | CPU 2
|
|-> cow_file_range() |-> __btrfs_buffered_write()
|-> btrfs_reserve_extent() | |
| | |
| | |
| ..... | |-> btrfs_check_data_free_space()
| |
| |
|-> extent_clear_unlock_delalloc() |
In CPU 1, btrfs_reserve_extent()->find_free_extent()->
btrfs_add_reserved_bytes() do not decrease bytes_may_use, the decrease
operation will be delayed to be done in extent_clear_unlock_delalloc().
Assume in this case, btrfs_reserve_extent() reserved 128MB data, CPU2's
btrfs_check_data_free_space() tries to reserve 100MB data space.
If
100MB > data_sinfo->total_bytes - data_sinfo->bytes_used -
data_sinfo->bytes_reserved - data_sinfo->bytes_pinned -
data_sinfo->bytes_readonly - data_sinfo->bytes_may_use
btrfs_check_data_free_space() will try to allcate new data chunk or call
btrfs_start_delalloc_roots(), or commit current transaction in order to
reserve some free space, obviously a lot of work. But indeed it's not
necessary as long as decreasing bytes_may_use timely, we still have
free space, decreasing 128M from bytes_may_use.
To fix this issue, this patch chooses to update bytes_may_use for both
data and metadata in btrfs_add_reserved_bytes(). For compress path, real
extent length may not be equal to file content length, so introduce a
ram_bytes argument for btrfs_reserve_extent(), find_free_extent() and
btrfs_add_reserved_bytes(), it's becasue bytes_may_use is increased by
file content length. Then compress path can update bytes_may_use
correctly. Also now we can discard RESERVE_ALLOC_NO_ACCOUNT, RESERVE_ALLOC
and RESERVE_FREE.
As we know, usually EXTENT_DO_ACCOUNTING is used for error path. In
run_delalloc_nocow(), for inode marked as NODATACOW or extent marked as
PREALLOC, we also need to update bytes_may_use, but can not pass
EXTENT_DO_ACCOUNTING, because it also clears metadata reservation, so
here we introduce EXTENT_CLEAR_DATA_RESV flag to indicate btrfs_clear_bit_hook()
to update btrfs_space_info's bytes_may_use.
Meanwhile __btrfs_prealloc_file_range() will call
btrfs_free_reserved_data_space() internally for both sucessful and failed
path, btrfs_prealloc_file_range()'s callers does not need to call
btrfs_free_reserved_data_space() any more.
Signed-off-by: Wang Xiaoguang <wangxg.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
6aadd9eb Tue Sep 04 20:55:27 CDT 2018 Liu Bo <bo.liu@linux.alibaba.com> Btrfs: remove confusing tracepoint in btrfs_add_reserved_bytes
Here we're not releasing any space, but transferring bytes from
->bytes_may_use to ->bytes_reserved. The last change to the code in
commit 18513091af9483ba8 ("btrfs: update btrfs_space_info's
bytes_may_use timely") removed a conditional tracepoint and the logic
changed too but the tracepiont remained.
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.liu@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[ update changelog ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
18513091 Mon Jul 25 02:51:40 CDT 2016 Wang Xiaoguang <wangxg.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> btrfs: update btrfs_space_info's bytes_may_use timely
This patch can fix some false ENOSPC errors, below test script can
reproduce one false ENOSPC error:
#!/bin/bash
dd if=/dev/zero of=fs.img bs=$((1024*1024)) count=128
dev=$(losetup --show -f fs.img)
mkfs.btrfs -f -M $dev
mkdir /tmp/mntpoint
mount $dev /tmp/mntpoint
cd /tmp/mntpoint
xfs_io -f -c "falloc 0 $((64*1024*1024))" testfile
Above script will fail for ENOSPC reason, but indeed fs still has free
space to satisfy this request. Please see call graph:
btrfs_fallocate()
|-> btrfs_alloc_data_chunk_ondemand()
| bytes_may_use += 64M
|-> btrfs_prealloc_file_range()
|-> btrfs_reserve_extent()
|-> btrfs_add_reserved_bytes()
| alloc_type is RESERVE_ALLOC_NO_ACCOUNT, so it does not
| change bytes_may_use, and bytes_reserved += 64M. Now
| bytes_may_use + bytes_reserved == 128M, which is greater
| than btrfs_space_info's total_bytes, false enospc occurs.
| Note, the bytes_may_use decrease operation will be done in
| end of btrfs_fallocate(), which is too late.
Here is another simple case for buffered write:
CPU 1 | CPU 2
|
|-> cow_file_range() |-> __btrfs_buffered_write()
|-> btrfs_reserve_extent() | |
| | |
| | |
| ..... | |-> btrfs_check_data_free_space()
| |
| |
|-> extent_clear_unlock_delalloc() |
In CPU 1, btrfs_reserve_extent()->find_free_extent()->
btrfs_add_reserved_bytes() do not decrease bytes_may_use, the decrease
operation will be delayed to be done in extent_clear_unlock_delalloc().
Assume in this case, btrfs_reserve_extent() reserved 128MB data, CPU2's
btrfs_check_data_free_space() tries to reserve 100MB data space.
If
100MB > data_sinfo->total_bytes - data_sinfo->bytes_used -
data_sinfo->bytes_reserved - data_sinfo->bytes_pinned -
data_sinfo->bytes_readonly - data_sinfo->bytes_may_use
btrfs_check_data_free_space() will try to allcate new data chunk or call
btrfs_start_delalloc_roots(), or commit current transaction in order to
reserve some free space, obviously a lot of work. But indeed it's not
necessary as long as decreasing bytes_may_use timely, we still have
free space, decreasing 128M from bytes_may_use.
To fix this issue, this patch chooses to update bytes_may_use for both
data and metadata in btrfs_add_reserved_bytes(). For compress path, real
extent length may not be equal to file content length, so introduce a
ram_bytes argument for btrfs_reserve_extent(), find_free_extent() and
btrfs_add_reserved_bytes(), it's becasue bytes_may_use is increased by
file content length. Then compress path can update bytes_may_use
correctly. Also now we can discard RESERVE_ALLOC_NO_ACCOUNT, RESERVE_ALLOC
and RESERVE_FREE.
As we know, usually EXTENT_DO_ACCOUNTING is used for error path. In
run_delalloc_nocow(), for inode marked as NODATACOW or extent marked as
PREALLOC, we also need to update bytes_may_use, but can not pass
EXTENT_DO_ACCOUNTING, because it also clears metadata reservation, so
here we introduce EXTENT_CLEAR_DATA_RESV flag to indicate btrfs_clear_bit_hook()
to update btrfs_space_info's bytes_may_use.
Meanwhile __btrfs_prealloc_file_range() will call
btrfs_free_reserved_data_space() internally for both sucessful and failed
path, btrfs_prealloc_file_range()'s callers does not need to call
btrfs_free_reserved_data_space() any more.
Signed-off-by: Wang Xiaoguang <wangxg.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
|
| H A D | ctree.h | 18513091 Mon Jul 25 02:51:40 CDT 2016 Wang Xiaoguang <wangxg.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> btrfs: update btrfs_space_info's bytes_may_use timely
This patch can fix some false ENOSPC errors, below test script can
reproduce one false ENOSPC error:
#!/bin/bash
dd if=/dev/zero of=fs.img bs=$((1024*1024)) count=128
dev=$(losetup --show -f fs.img)
mkfs.btrfs -f -M $dev
mkdir /tmp/mntpoint
mount $dev /tmp/mntpoint
cd /tmp/mntpoint
xfs_io -f -c "falloc 0 $((64*1024*1024))" testfile
Above script will fail for ENOSPC reason, but indeed fs still has free
space to satisfy this request. Please see call graph:
btrfs_fallocate()
|-> btrfs_alloc_data_chunk_ondemand()
| bytes_may_use += 64M
|-> btrfs_prealloc_file_range()
|-> btrfs_reserve_extent()
|-> btrfs_add_reserved_bytes()
| alloc_type is RESERVE_ALLOC_NO_ACCOUNT, so it does not
| change bytes_may_use, and bytes_reserved += 64M. Now
| bytes_may_use + bytes_reserved == 128M, which is greater
| than btrfs_space_info's total_bytes, false enospc occurs.
| Note, the bytes_may_use decrease operation will be done in
| end of btrfs_fallocate(), which is too late.
Here is another simple case for buffered write:
CPU 1 | CPU 2
|
|-> cow_file_range() |-> __btrfs_buffered_write()
|-> btrfs_reserve_extent() | |
| | |
| | |
| ..... | |-> btrfs_check_data_free_space()
| |
| |
|-> extent_clear_unlock_delalloc() |
In CPU 1, btrfs_reserve_extent()->find_free_extent()->
btrfs_add_reserved_bytes() do not decrease bytes_may_use, the decrease
operation will be delayed to be done in extent_clear_unlock_delalloc().
Assume in this case, btrfs_reserve_extent() reserved 128MB data, CPU2's
btrfs_check_data_free_space() tries to reserve 100MB data space.
If
100MB > data_sinfo->total_bytes - data_sinfo->bytes_used -
data_sinfo->bytes_reserved - data_sinfo->bytes_pinned -
data_sinfo->bytes_readonly - data_sinfo->bytes_may_use
btrfs_check_data_free_space() will try to allcate new data chunk or call
btrfs_start_delalloc_roots(), or commit current transaction in order to
reserve some free space, obviously a lot of work. But indeed it's not
necessary as long as decreasing bytes_may_use timely, we still have
free space, decreasing 128M from bytes_may_use.
To fix this issue, this patch chooses to update bytes_may_use for both
data and metadata in btrfs_add_reserved_bytes(). For compress path, real
extent length may not be equal to file content length, so introduce a
ram_bytes argument for btrfs_reserve_extent(), find_free_extent() and
btrfs_add_reserved_bytes(), it's becasue bytes_may_use is increased by
file content length. Then compress path can update bytes_may_use
correctly. Also now we can discard RESERVE_ALLOC_NO_ACCOUNT, RESERVE_ALLOC
and RESERVE_FREE.
As we know, usually EXTENT_DO_ACCOUNTING is used for error path. In
run_delalloc_nocow(), for inode marked as NODATACOW or extent marked as
PREALLOC, we also need to update bytes_may_use, but can not pass
EXTENT_DO_ACCOUNTING, because it also clears metadata reservation, so
here we introduce EXTENT_CLEAR_DATA_RESV flag to indicate btrfs_clear_bit_hook()
to update btrfs_space_info's bytes_may_use.
Meanwhile __btrfs_prealloc_file_range() will call
btrfs_free_reserved_data_space() internally for both sucessful and failed
path, btrfs_prealloc_file_range()'s callers does not need to call
btrfs_free_reserved_data_space() any more.
Signed-off-by: Wang Xiaoguang <wangxg.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
18513091 Mon Jul 25 02:51:40 CDT 2016 Wang Xiaoguang <wangxg.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> btrfs: update btrfs_space_info's bytes_may_use timely
This patch can fix some false ENOSPC errors, below test script can
reproduce one false ENOSPC error:
#!/bin/bash
dd if=/dev/zero of=fs.img bs=$((1024*1024)) count=128
dev=$(losetup --show -f fs.img)
mkfs.btrfs -f -M $dev
mkdir /tmp/mntpoint
mount $dev /tmp/mntpoint
cd /tmp/mntpoint
xfs_io -f -c "falloc 0 $((64*1024*1024))" testfile
Above script will fail for ENOSPC reason, but indeed fs still has free
space to satisfy this request. Please see call graph:
btrfs_fallocate()
|-> btrfs_alloc_data_chunk_ondemand()
| bytes_may_use += 64M
|-> btrfs_prealloc_file_range()
|-> btrfs_reserve_extent()
|-> btrfs_add_reserved_bytes()
| alloc_type is RESERVE_ALLOC_NO_ACCOUNT, so it does not
| change bytes_may_use, and bytes_reserved += 64M. Now
| bytes_may_use + bytes_reserved == 128M, which is greater
| than btrfs_space_info's total_bytes, false enospc occurs.
| Note, the bytes_may_use decrease operation will be done in
| end of btrfs_fallocate(), which is too late.
Here is another simple case for buffered write:
CPU 1 | CPU 2
|
|-> cow_file_range() |-> __btrfs_buffered_write()
|-> btrfs_reserve_extent() | |
| | |
| | |
| ..... | |-> btrfs_check_data_free_space()
| |
| |
|-> extent_clear_unlock_delalloc() |
In CPU 1, btrfs_reserve_extent()->find_free_extent()->
btrfs_add_reserved_bytes() do not decrease bytes_may_use, the decrease
operation will be delayed to be done in extent_clear_unlock_delalloc().
Assume in this case, btrfs_reserve_extent() reserved 128MB data, CPU2's
btrfs_check_data_free_space() tries to reserve 100MB data space.
If
100MB > data_sinfo->total_bytes - data_sinfo->bytes_used -
data_sinfo->bytes_reserved - data_sinfo->bytes_pinned -
data_sinfo->bytes_readonly - data_sinfo->bytes_may_use
btrfs_check_data_free_space() will try to allcate new data chunk or call
btrfs_start_delalloc_roots(), or commit current transaction in order to
reserve some free space, obviously a lot of work. But indeed it's not
necessary as long as decreasing bytes_may_use timely, we still have
free space, decreasing 128M from bytes_may_use.
To fix this issue, this patch chooses to update bytes_may_use for both
data and metadata in btrfs_add_reserved_bytes(). For compress path, real
extent length may not be equal to file content length, so introduce a
ram_bytes argument for btrfs_reserve_extent(), find_free_extent() and
btrfs_add_reserved_bytes(), it's becasue bytes_may_use is increased by
file content length. Then compress path can update bytes_may_use
correctly. Also now we can discard RESERVE_ALLOC_NO_ACCOUNT, RESERVE_ALLOC
and RESERVE_FREE.
As we know, usually EXTENT_DO_ACCOUNTING is used for error path. In
run_delalloc_nocow(), for inode marked as NODATACOW or extent marked as
PREALLOC, we also need to update bytes_may_use, but can not pass
EXTENT_DO_ACCOUNTING, because it also clears metadata reservation, so
here we introduce EXTENT_CLEAR_DATA_RESV flag to indicate btrfs_clear_bit_hook()
to update btrfs_space_info's bytes_may_use.
Meanwhile __btrfs_prealloc_file_range() will call
btrfs_free_reserved_data_space() internally for both sucessful and failed
path, btrfs_prealloc_file_range()'s callers does not need to call
btrfs_free_reserved_data_space() any more.
Signed-off-by: Wang Xiaoguang <wangxg.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
|
| H A D | inode.c | 18513091 Mon Jul 25 02:51:40 CDT 2016 Wang Xiaoguang <wangxg.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> btrfs: update btrfs_space_info's bytes_may_use timely
This patch can fix some false ENOSPC errors, below test script can
reproduce one false ENOSPC error:
#!/bin/bash
dd if=/dev/zero of=fs.img bs=$((1024*1024)) count=128
dev=$(losetup --show -f fs.img)
mkfs.btrfs -f -M $dev
mkdir /tmp/mntpoint
mount $dev /tmp/mntpoint
cd /tmp/mntpoint
xfs_io -f -c "falloc 0 $((64*1024*1024))" testfile
Above script will fail for ENOSPC reason, but indeed fs still has free
space to satisfy this request. Please see call graph:
btrfs_fallocate()
|-> btrfs_alloc_data_chunk_ondemand()
| bytes_may_use += 64M
|-> btrfs_prealloc_file_range()
|-> btrfs_reserve_extent()
|-> btrfs_add_reserved_bytes()
| alloc_type is RESERVE_ALLOC_NO_ACCOUNT, so it does not
| change bytes_may_use, and bytes_reserved += 64M. Now
| bytes_may_use + bytes_reserved == 128M, which is greater
| than btrfs_space_info's total_bytes, false enospc occurs.
| Note, the bytes_may_use decrease operation will be done in
| end of btrfs_fallocate(), which is too late.
Here is another simple case for buffered write:
CPU 1 | CPU 2
|
|-> cow_file_range() |-> __btrfs_buffered_write()
|-> btrfs_reserve_extent() | |
| | |
| | |
| ..... | |-> btrfs_check_data_free_space()
| |
| |
|-> extent_clear_unlock_delalloc() |
In CPU 1, btrfs_reserve_extent()->find_free_extent()->
btrfs_add_reserved_bytes() do not decrease bytes_may_use, the decrease
operation will be delayed to be done in extent_clear_unlock_delalloc().
Assume in this case, btrfs_reserve_extent() reserved 128MB data, CPU2's
btrfs_check_data_free_space() tries to reserve 100MB data space.
If
100MB > data_sinfo->total_bytes - data_sinfo->bytes_used -
data_sinfo->bytes_reserved - data_sinfo->bytes_pinned -
data_sinfo->bytes_readonly - data_sinfo->bytes_may_use
btrfs_check_data_free_space() will try to allcate new data chunk or call
btrfs_start_delalloc_roots(), or commit current transaction in order to
reserve some free space, obviously a lot of work. But indeed it's not
necessary as long as decreasing bytes_may_use timely, we still have
free space, decreasing 128M from bytes_may_use.
To fix this issue, this patch chooses to update bytes_may_use for both
data and metadata in btrfs_add_reserved_bytes(). For compress path, real
extent length may not be equal to file content length, so introduce a
ram_bytes argument for btrfs_reserve_extent(), find_free_extent() and
btrfs_add_reserved_bytes(), it's becasue bytes_may_use is increased by
file content length. Then compress path can update bytes_may_use
correctly. Also now we can discard RESERVE_ALLOC_NO_ACCOUNT, RESERVE_ALLOC
and RESERVE_FREE.
As we know, usually EXTENT_DO_ACCOUNTING is used for error path. In
run_delalloc_nocow(), for inode marked as NODATACOW or extent marked as
PREALLOC, we also need to update bytes_may_use, but can not pass
EXTENT_DO_ACCOUNTING, because it also clears metadata reservation, so
here we introduce EXTENT_CLEAR_DATA_RESV flag to indicate btrfs_clear_bit_hook()
to update btrfs_space_info's bytes_may_use.
Meanwhile __btrfs_prealloc_file_range() will call
btrfs_free_reserved_data_space() internally for both sucessful and failed
path, btrfs_prealloc_file_range()'s callers does not need to call
btrfs_free_reserved_data_space() any more.
Signed-off-by: Wang Xiaoguang <wangxg.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
18513091 Mon Jul 25 02:51:40 CDT 2016 Wang Xiaoguang <wangxg.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> btrfs: update btrfs_space_info's bytes_may_use timely
This patch can fix some false ENOSPC errors, below test script can
reproduce one false ENOSPC error:
#!/bin/bash
dd if=/dev/zero of=fs.img bs=$((1024*1024)) count=128
dev=$(losetup --show -f fs.img)
mkfs.btrfs -f -M $dev
mkdir /tmp/mntpoint
mount $dev /tmp/mntpoint
cd /tmp/mntpoint
xfs_io -f -c "falloc 0 $((64*1024*1024))" testfile
Above script will fail for ENOSPC reason, but indeed fs still has free
space to satisfy this request. Please see call graph:
btrfs_fallocate()
|-> btrfs_alloc_data_chunk_ondemand()
| bytes_may_use += 64M
|-> btrfs_prealloc_file_range()
|-> btrfs_reserve_extent()
|-> btrfs_add_reserved_bytes()
| alloc_type is RESERVE_ALLOC_NO_ACCOUNT, so it does not
| change bytes_may_use, and bytes_reserved += 64M. Now
| bytes_may_use + bytes_reserved == 128M, which is greater
| than btrfs_space_info's total_bytes, false enospc occurs.
| Note, the bytes_may_use decrease operation will be done in
| end of btrfs_fallocate(), which is too late.
Here is another simple case for buffered write:
CPU 1 | CPU 2
|
|-> cow_file_range() |-> __btrfs_buffered_write()
|-> btrfs_reserve_extent() | |
| | |
| | |
| ..... | |-> btrfs_check_data_free_space()
| |
| |
|-> extent_clear_unlock_delalloc() |
In CPU 1, btrfs_reserve_extent()->find_free_extent()->
btrfs_add_reserved_bytes() do not decrease bytes_may_use, the decrease
operation will be delayed to be done in extent_clear_unlock_delalloc().
Assume in this case, btrfs_reserve_extent() reserved 128MB data, CPU2's
btrfs_check_data_free_space() tries to reserve 100MB data space.
If
100MB > data_sinfo->total_bytes - data_sinfo->bytes_used -
data_sinfo->bytes_reserved - data_sinfo->bytes_pinned -
data_sinfo->bytes_readonly - data_sinfo->bytes_may_use
btrfs_check_data_free_space() will try to allcate new data chunk or call
btrfs_start_delalloc_roots(), or commit current transaction in order to
reserve some free space, obviously a lot of work. But indeed it's not
necessary as long as decreasing bytes_may_use timely, we still have
free space, decreasing 128M from bytes_may_use.
To fix this issue, this patch chooses to update bytes_may_use for both
data and metadata in btrfs_add_reserved_bytes(). For compress path, real
extent length may not be equal to file content length, so introduce a
ram_bytes argument for btrfs_reserve_extent(), find_free_extent() and
btrfs_add_reserved_bytes(), it's becasue bytes_may_use is increased by
file content length. Then compress path can update bytes_may_use
correctly. Also now we can discard RESERVE_ALLOC_NO_ACCOUNT, RESERVE_ALLOC
and RESERVE_FREE.
As we know, usually EXTENT_DO_ACCOUNTING is used for error path. In
run_delalloc_nocow(), for inode marked as NODATACOW or extent marked as
PREALLOC, we also need to update bytes_may_use, but can not pass
EXTENT_DO_ACCOUNTING, because it also clears metadata reservation, so
here we introduce EXTENT_CLEAR_DATA_RESV flag to indicate btrfs_clear_bit_hook()
to update btrfs_space_info's bytes_may_use.
Meanwhile __btrfs_prealloc_file_range() will call
btrfs_free_reserved_data_space() internally for both sucessful and failed
path, btrfs_prealloc_file_range()'s callers does not need to call
btrfs_free_reserved_data_space() any more.
Signed-off-by: Wang Xiaoguang <wangxg.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
|