Home
last modified time | relevance | path

Searched hist:"1385 d755" (Results 1 – 6 of 6) sorted by relevance

/openbmc/linux/drivers/net/netdevsim/
H A Dbpf.c1385d755 Fri Nov 09 07:03:25 CST 2018 Quentin Monnet <quentin.monnet@netronome.com> bpf: pass a struct with offload callbacks to bpf_offload_dev_create()

For passing device functions for offloaded eBPF programs, there used to
be no place where to store the pointer without making the non-offloaded
programs pay a memory price.

As a consequence, three functions were called with ndo_bpf() through
specific commands. Now that we have struct bpf_offload_dev, and since
none of those operations rely on RTNL, we can turn these three commands
into hooks inside the struct bpf_prog_offload_ops, and pass them as part
of bpf_offload_dev_create().

This commit effectively passes a pointer to the struct to
bpf_offload_dev_create(). We temporarily have two struct
bpf_prog_offload_ops instances, one under offdev->ops and one under
offload->dev_ops. The next patches will make the transition towards the
former, so that offload->dev_ops can be removed, and callbacks relying
on ndo_bpf() added to offdev->ops as well.

While at it, rename "nfp_bpf_analyzer_ops" as "nfp_bpf_dev_ops" (and
similarly for netdevsim).

Suggested-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin.monnet@netronome.com>
Reviewed-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
1385d755 Fri Nov 09 07:03:25 CST 2018 Quentin Monnet <quentin.monnet@netronome.com> bpf: pass a struct with offload callbacks to bpf_offload_dev_create()

For passing device functions for offloaded eBPF programs, there used to
be no place where to store the pointer without making the non-offloaded
programs pay a memory price.

As a consequence, three functions were called with ndo_bpf() through
specific commands. Now that we have struct bpf_offload_dev, and since
none of those operations rely on RTNL, we can turn these three commands
into hooks inside the struct bpf_prog_offload_ops, and pass them as part
of bpf_offload_dev_create().

This commit effectively passes a pointer to the struct to
bpf_offload_dev_create(). We temporarily have two struct
bpf_prog_offload_ops instances, one under offdev->ops and one under
offload->dev_ops. The next patches will make the transition towards the
former, so that offload->dev_ops can be removed, and callbacks relying
on ndo_bpf() added to offdev->ops as well.

While at it, rename "nfp_bpf_analyzer_ops" as "nfp_bpf_dev_ops" (and
similarly for netdevsim).

Suggested-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin.monnet@netronome.com>
Reviewed-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
/openbmc/linux/kernel/bpf/
H A Doffload.c1385d755 Fri Nov 09 07:03:25 CST 2018 Quentin Monnet <quentin.monnet@netronome.com> bpf: pass a struct with offload callbacks to bpf_offload_dev_create()

For passing device functions for offloaded eBPF programs, there used to
be no place where to store the pointer without making the non-offloaded
programs pay a memory price.

As a consequence, three functions were called with ndo_bpf() through
specific commands. Now that we have struct bpf_offload_dev, and since
none of those operations rely on RTNL, we can turn these three commands
into hooks inside the struct bpf_prog_offload_ops, and pass them as part
of bpf_offload_dev_create().

This commit effectively passes a pointer to the struct to
bpf_offload_dev_create(). We temporarily have two struct
bpf_prog_offload_ops instances, one under offdev->ops and one under
offload->dev_ops. The next patches will make the transition towards the
former, so that offload->dev_ops can be removed, and callbacks relying
on ndo_bpf() added to offdev->ops as well.

While at it, rename "nfp_bpf_analyzer_ops" as "nfp_bpf_dev_ops" (and
similarly for netdevsim).

Suggested-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin.monnet@netronome.com>
Reviewed-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
1385d755 Fri Nov 09 07:03:25 CST 2018 Quentin Monnet <quentin.monnet@netronome.com> bpf: pass a struct with offload callbacks to bpf_offload_dev_create()

For passing device functions for offloaded eBPF programs, there used to
be no place where to store the pointer without making the non-offloaded
programs pay a memory price.

As a consequence, three functions were called with ndo_bpf() through
specific commands. Now that we have struct bpf_offload_dev, and since
none of those operations rely on RTNL, we can turn these three commands
into hooks inside the struct bpf_prog_offload_ops, and pass them as part
of bpf_offload_dev_create().

This commit effectively passes a pointer to the struct to
bpf_offload_dev_create(). We temporarily have two struct
bpf_prog_offload_ops instances, one under offdev->ops and one under
offload->dev_ops. The next patches will make the transition towards the
former, so that offload->dev_ops can be removed, and callbacks relying
on ndo_bpf() added to offdev->ops as well.

While at it, rename "nfp_bpf_analyzer_ops" as "nfp_bpf_dev_ops" (and
similarly for netdevsim).

Suggested-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin.monnet@netronome.com>
Reviewed-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
/openbmc/linux/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/bpf/
H A Doffload.c1385d755 Fri Nov 09 07:03:25 CST 2018 Quentin Monnet <quentin.monnet@netronome.com> bpf: pass a struct with offload callbacks to bpf_offload_dev_create()

For passing device functions for offloaded eBPF programs, there used to
be no place where to store the pointer without making the non-offloaded
programs pay a memory price.

As a consequence, three functions were called with ndo_bpf() through
specific commands. Now that we have struct bpf_offload_dev, and since
none of those operations rely on RTNL, we can turn these three commands
into hooks inside the struct bpf_prog_offload_ops, and pass them as part
of bpf_offload_dev_create().

This commit effectively passes a pointer to the struct to
bpf_offload_dev_create(). We temporarily have two struct
bpf_prog_offload_ops instances, one under offdev->ops and one under
offload->dev_ops. The next patches will make the transition towards the
former, so that offload->dev_ops can be removed, and callbacks relying
on ndo_bpf() added to offdev->ops as well.

While at it, rename "nfp_bpf_analyzer_ops" as "nfp_bpf_dev_ops" (and
similarly for netdevsim).

Suggested-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin.monnet@netronome.com>
Reviewed-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
1385d755 Fri Nov 09 07:03:25 CST 2018 Quentin Monnet <quentin.monnet@netronome.com> bpf: pass a struct with offload callbacks to bpf_offload_dev_create()

For passing device functions for offloaded eBPF programs, there used to
be no place where to store the pointer without making the non-offloaded
programs pay a memory price.

As a consequence, three functions were called with ndo_bpf() through
specific commands. Now that we have struct bpf_offload_dev, and since
none of those operations rely on RTNL, we can turn these three commands
into hooks inside the struct bpf_prog_offload_ops, and pass them as part
of bpf_offload_dev_create().

This commit effectively passes a pointer to the struct to
bpf_offload_dev_create(). We temporarily have two struct
bpf_prog_offload_ops instances, one under offdev->ops and one under
offload->dev_ops. The next patches will make the transition towards the
former, so that offload->dev_ops can be removed, and callbacks relying
on ndo_bpf() added to offdev->ops as well.

While at it, rename "nfp_bpf_analyzer_ops" as "nfp_bpf_dev_ops" (and
similarly for netdevsim).

Suggested-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin.monnet@netronome.com>
Reviewed-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
H A Dmain.c1385d755 Fri Nov 09 07:03:25 CST 2018 Quentin Monnet <quentin.monnet@netronome.com> bpf: pass a struct with offload callbacks to bpf_offload_dev_create()

For passing device functions for offloaded eBPF programs, there used to
be no place where to store the pointer without making the non-offloaded
programs pay a memory price.

As a consequence, three functions were called with ndo_bpf() through
specific commands. Now that we have struct bpf_offload_dev, and since
none of those operations rely on RTNL, we can turn these three commands
into hooks inside the struct bpf_prog_offload_ops, and pass them as part
of bpf_offload_dev_create().

This commit effectively passes a pointer to the struct to
bpf_offload_dev_create(). We temporarily have two struct
bpf_prog_offload_ops instances, one under offdev->ops and one under
offload->dev_ops. The next patches will make the transition towards the
former, so that offload->dev_ops can be removed, and callbacks relying
on ndo_bpf() added to offdev->ops as well.

While at it, rename "nfp_bpf_analyzer_ops" as "nfp_bpf_dev_ops" (and
similarly for netdevsim).

Suggested-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin.monnet@netronome.com>
Reviewed-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
1385d755 Fri Nov 09 07:03:25 CST 2018 Quentin Monnet <quentin.monnet@netronome.com> bpf: pass a struct with offload callbacks to bpf_offload_dev_create()

For passing device functions for offloaded eBPF programs, there used to
be no place where to store the pointer without making the non-offloaded
programs pay a memory price.

As a consequence, three functions were called with ndo_bpf() through
specific commands. Now that we have struct bpf_offload_dev, and since
none of those operations rely on RTNL, we can turn these three commands
into hooks inside the struct bpf_prog_offload_ops, and pass them as part
of bpf_offload_dev_create().

This commit effectively passes a pointer to the struct to
bpf_offload_dev_create(). We temporarily have two struct
bpf_prog_offload_ops instances, one under offdev->ops and one under
offload->dev_ops. The next patches will make the transition towards the
former, so that offload->dev_ops can be removed, and callbacks relying
on ndo_bpf() added to offdev->ops as well.

While at it, rename "nfp_bpf_analyzer_ops" as "nfp_bpf_dev_ops" (and
similarly for netdevsim).

Suggested-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin.monnet@netronome.com>
Reviewed-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
H A Dmain.h1385d755 Fri Nov 09 07:03:25 CST 2018 Quentin Monnet <quentin.monnet@netronome.com> bpf: pass a struct with offload callbacks to bpf_offload_dev_create()

For passing device functions for offloaded eBPF programs, there used to
be no place where to store the pointer without making the non-offloaded
programs pay a memory price.

As a consequence, three functions were called with ndo_bpf() through
specific commands. Now that we have struct bpf_offload_dev, and since
none of those operations rely on RTNL, we can turn these three commands
into hooks inside the struct bpf_prog_offload_ops, and pass them as part
of bpf_offload_dev_create().

This commit effectively passes a pointer to the struct to
bpf_offload_dev_create(). We temporarily have two struct
bpf_prog_offload_ops instances, one under offdev->ops and one under
offload->dev_ops. The next patches will make the transition towards the
former, so that offload->dev_ops can be removed, and callbacks relying
on ndo_bpf() added to offdev->ops as well.

While at it, rename "nfp_bpf_analyzer_ops" as "nfp_bpf_dev_ops" (and
similarly for netdevsim).

Suggested-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin.monnet@netronome.com>
Reviewed-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
1385d755 Fri Nov 09 07:03:25 CST 2018 Quentin Monnet <quentin.monnet@netronome.com> bpf: pass a struct with offload callbacks to bpf_offload_dev_create()

For passing device functions for offloaded eBPF programs, there used to
be no place where to store the pointer without making the non-offloaded
programs pay a memory price.

As a consequence, three functions were called with ndo_bpf() through
specific commands. Now that we have struct bpf_offload_dev, and since
none of those operations rely on RTNL, we can turn these three commands
into hooks inside the struct bpf_prog_offload_ops, and pass them as part
of bpf_offload_dev_create().

This commit effectively passes a pointer to the struct to
bpf_offload_dev_create(). We temporarily have two struct
bpf_prog_offload_ops instances, one under offdev->ops and one under
offload->dev_ops. The next patches will make the transition towards the
former, so that offload->dev_ops can be removed, and callbacks relying
on ndo_bpf() added to offdev->ops as well.

While at it, rename "nfp_bpf_analyzer_ops" as "nfp_bpf_dev_ops" (and
similarly for netdevsim).

Suggested-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin.monnet@netronome.com>
Reviewed-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
/openbmc/linux/include/linux/
H A Dbpf.h1385d755 Fri Nov 09 07:03:25 CST 2018 Quentin Monnet <quentin.monnet@netronome.com> bpf: pass a struct with offload callbacks to bpf_offload_dev_create()

For passing device functions for offloaded eBPF programs, there used to
be no place where to store the pointer without making the non-offloaded
programs pay a memory price.

As a consequence, three functions were called with ndo_bpf() through
specific commands. Now that we have struct bpf_offload_dev, and since
none of those operations rely on RTNL, we can turn these three commands
into hooks inside the struct bpf_prog_offload_ops, and pass them as part
of bpf_offload_dev_create().

This commit effectively passes a pointer to the struct to
bpf_offload_dev_create(). We temporarily have two struct
bpf_prog_offload_ops instances, one under offdev->ops and one under
offload->dev_ops. The next patches will make the transition towards the
former, so that offload->dev_ops can be removed, and callbacks relying
on ndo_bpf() added to offdev->ops as well.

While at it, rename "nfp_bpf_analyzer_ops" as "nfp_bpf_dev_ops" (and
similarly for netdevsim).

Suggested-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin.monnet@netronome.com>
Reviewed-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
1385d755 Fri Nov 09 07:03:25 CST 2018 Quentin Monnet <quentin.monnet@netronome.com> bpf: pass a struct with offload callbacks to bpf_offload_dev_create()

For passing device functions for offloaded eBPF programs, there used to
be no place where to store the pointer without making the non-offloaded
programs pay a memory price.

As a consequence, three functions were called with ndo_bpf() through
specific commands. Now that we have struct bpf_offload_dev, and since
none of those operations rely on RTNL, we can turn these three commands
into hooks inside the struct bpf_prog_offload_ops, and pass them as part
of bpf_offload_dev_create().

This commit effectively passes a pointer to the struct to
bpf_offload_dev_create(). We temporarily have two struct
bpf_prog_offload_ops instances, one under offdev->ops and one under
offload->dev_ops. The next patches will make the transition towards the
former, so that offload->dev_ops can be removed, and callbacks relying
on ndo_bpf() added to offdev->ops as well.

While at it, rename "nfp_bpf_analyzer_ops" as "nfp_bpf_dev_ops" (and
similarly for netdevsim).

Suggested-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin.monnet@netronome.com>
Reviewed-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>