bpf: support deferring bpf_link dealloc to after RCU grace period

commit 1a80dbcb2dbaf6e4c216e62e30fa7d3daa8001ce upstream.

BPF link for some program types is passed as a "context" which can be
use

bpf: support deferring bpf_link dealloc to after RCU grace period

commit 1a80dbcb2dbaf6e4c216e62e30fa7d3daa8001ce upstream.

BPF link for some program types is passed as a "context" which can be
used by those BPF programs to look up additional information. E.g., for
multi-kprobes and multi-uprobes, link is used to fetch BPF cookie values.

Because of this runtime dependency, when bpf_link refcnt drops to zero
there could still be active BPF programs running accessing link data.

This patch adds generic support to defer bpf_link dealloc callback to
after RCU GP, if requested. This is done by exposing two different
deallocation callbacks, one synchronous and one deferred. If deferred
one is provided, bpf_link_free() will schedule dealloc_deferred()
callback to happen after RCU GP.

BPF is using two flavors of RCU: "classic" non-sleepable one and RCU
tasks trace one. The latter is used when sleepable BPF programs are
used. bpf_link_free() accommodates that by checking underlying BPF
program's sleepable flag, and goes either through normal RCU GP only for
non-sleepable, or through RCU tasks trace GP *and* then normal RCU GP
(taking into account rcu_trace_implies_rcu_gp() optimization), if BPF
program is sleepable.

We use this for multi-kprobe and multi-uprobe links, which dereference
link during program run. We also preventively switch raw_tp link to use
deferred dealloc callback, as upcoming changes in bpf-next tree expose
raw_tp link data (specifically, cookie value) to BPF program at runtime
as well.

Fixes: 0dcac2725406 ("bpf: Add multi kprobe link")
Fixes: 89ae89f53d20 ("bpf: Add multi uprobe link")
Reported-by: syzbot+981935d9485a560bfbcb@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Reported-by: syzbot+2cb5a6c573e98db598cc@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Reported-by: syzbot+62d8b26793e8a2bd0516@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240328052426.3042617-2-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

show more ...

bpf: Defer the free of inner map when necessary

[ Upstream commit 876673364161da50eed6b472d746ef88242b2368 ]

When updating or deleting an inner map in map array or map htab, the map
may still be ac

bpf: Defer the free of inner map when necessary

[ Upstream commit 876673364161da50eed6b472d746ef88242b2368 ]

When updating or deleting an inner map in map array or map htab, the map
may still be accessed by non-sleepable program or sleepable program.
However bpf_map_fd_put_ptr() decreases the ref-counter of the inner map
directly through bpf_map_put(), if the ref-counter is the last one
(which is true for most cases), the inner map will be freed by
ops->map_free() in a kworker. But for now, most .map_free() callbacks
don't use synchronize_rcu() or its variants to wait for the elapse of a
RCU grace period, so after the invocation of ops->map_free completes,
the bpf program which is accessing the inner map may incur
use-after-free problem.

Fix the free of inner map by invoking bpf_map_free_deferred() after both
one RCU grace period and one tasks trace RCU grace period if the inner
map has been removed from the outer map before. The deferment is
accomplished by using call_rcu() or call_rcu_tasks_trace() when
releasing the last ref-counter of bpf map. The newly-added rcu_head
field in bpf_map shares the same storage space with work field to
reduce the size of bpf_map.

Fixes: bba1dc0b55ac ("bpf: Remove redundant synchronize_rcu.")
Fixes: 638e4b825d52 ("bpf: Allows per-cpu maps and map-in-map in sleepable programs")
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231204140425.1480317-5-houtao@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

show more ...

bpf: Add map and need_defer parameters to .map_fd_put_ptr()

[ Upstream commit 20c20bd11a0702ce4dc9300c3da58acf551d9725 ]

map is the pointer of outer map, and need_defer needs some explanation.
need

bpf: Add map and need_defer parameters to .map_fd_put_ptr()

[ Upstream commit 20c20bd11a0702ce4dc9300c3da58acf551d9725 ]

map is the pointer of outer map, and need_defer needs some explanation.
need_defer tells the implementation to defer the reference release of
the passed element and ensure that the element is still alive before
the bpf program, which may manipulate it, exits.

The following three cases will invoke map_fd_put_ptr() and different
need_defer values will be passed to these callers:

1) release the reference of the old element in the map during map update
or map deletion. The release must be deferred, otherwise the bpf
program may incur use-after-free problem, so need_defer needs to be
true.
2) release the reference of the to-be-added element in the error path of
map update. The to-be-added element is not visible to any bpf
program, so it is OK to pass false for need_defer parameter.
3) release the references of all elements in the map during map release.
Any bpf program which has access to the map must have been exited and
released, so need_defer=false will be OK.

These two parameters will be used by the following patches to fix the
potential use-after-free problem for map-in-map.

Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231204140425.1480317-3-houtao@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Stable-dep-of: 876673364161 ("bpf: Defer the free of inner map when necessary")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

show more ...

bpf: Fix prog_array_map_poke_run map poke update

commit 4b7de801606e504e69689df71475d27e35336fb3 upstream.

Lee pointed out issue found by syscaller [0] hitting BUG in prog array
map poke update in

bpf: Fix prog_array_map_poke_run map poke update

commit 4b7de801606e504e69689df71475d27e35336fb3 upstream.

Lee pointed out issue found by syscaller [0] hitting BUG in prog array
map poke update in prog_array_map_poke_run function due to error value
returned from bpf_arch_text_poke function.

There's race window where bpf_arch_text_poke can fail due to missing
bpf program kallsym symbols, which is accounted for with check for
-EINVAL in that BUG_ON call.

The problem is that in such case we won't update the tail call jump
and cause imbalance for the next tail call update check which will
fail with -EBUSY in bpf_arch_text_poke.

I'm hitting following race during the program load:

CPU 0 CPU 1

bpf_prog_load
bpf_check
do_misc_fixups
prog_array_map_poke_track

map_update_elem
bpf_fd_array_map_update_elem
prog_array_map_poke_run

bpf_arch_text_poke returns -EINVAL

bpf_prog_kallsyms_add

After bpf_arch_text_poke (CPU 1) fails to update the tail call jump, the next
poke update fails on expected jump instruction check in bpf_arch_text_poke
with -EBUSY and triggers the BUG_ON in prog_array_map_poke_run.

Similar race exists on the program unload.

Fixing this by moving the update to bpf_arch_poke_desc_update function which
makes sure we call __bpf_arch_text_poke that skips the bpf address check.

Each architecture has slightly different approach wrt looking up bpf address
in bpf_arch_text_poke, so instead of splitting the function or adding new
'checkip' argument in previous version, it seems best to move the whole
map_poke_run update as arch specific code.

[0] https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=97a4fe20470e9bc30810

Fixes: ebf7d1f508a7 ("bpf, x64: rework pro/epilogue and tailcall handling in JIT")
Reported-by: syzbot+97a4fe20470e9bc30810@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Cc: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>
Cc: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231206083041.1306660-2-jolsa@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

show more ...

bpf: handle ldimm64 properly in check_cfg()

[ Upstream commit 3feb263bb516ee7e1da0acd22b15afbb9a7daa19 ]

ldimm64 instructions are 16-byte long, and so have to be handled
appropriately in check_cfg(

bpf: handle ldimm64 properly in check_cfg()

[ Upstream commit 3feb263bb516ee7e1da0acd22b15afbb9a7daa19 ]

ldimm64 instructions are 16-byte long, and so have to be handled
appropriately in check_cfg(), just like the rest of BPF verifier does.

This has implications in three places:
- when determining next instruction for non-jump instructions;
- when determining next instruction for callback address ldimm64
instructions (in visit_func_call_insn());
- when checking for unreachable instructions, where second half of
ldimm64 is expected to be unreachable;

We take this also as an opportunity to report jump into the middle of
ldimm64. And adjust few test_verifier tests accordingly.

Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Hao Sun <sunhao.th@gmail.com>
Fixes: 475fb78fbf48 ("bpf: verifier (add branch/goto checks)")
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231110002638.4168352-2-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

show more ...

bpf, x64: Fix tailcall infinite loop

[ Upstream commit 2b5dcb31a19a2e0acd869b12c9db9b2d696ef544 ]

From commit ebf7d1f508a73871 ("bpf, x64: rework pro/epilogue and tailcall
handling in JIT"), the ta

bpf, x64: Fix tailcall infinite loop

[ Upstream commit 2b5dcb31a19a2e0acd869b12c9db9b2d696ef544 ]

From commit ebf7d1f508a73871 ("bpf, x64: rework pro/epilogue and tailcall
handling in JIT"), the tailcall on x64 works better than before.

From commit e411901c0b775a3a ("bpf: allow for tailcalls in BPF subprograms
for x64 JIT"), tailcall is able to run in BPF subprograms on x64.

From commit 5b92a28aae4dd0f8 ("bpf: Support attaching tracing BPF program
to other BPF programs"), BPF program is able to trace other BPF programs.

How about combining them all together?

1. FENTRY/FEXIT on a BPF subprogram.
2. A tailcall runs in the BPF subprogram.
3. The tailcall calls the subprogram's caller.

As a result, a tailcall infinite loop comes up. And the loop would halt
the machine.

As we know, in tail call context, the tail_call_cnt propagates by stack
and rax register between BPF subprograms. So do in trampolines.

Fixes: ebf7d1f508a7 ("bpf, x64: rework pro/epilogue and tailcall handling in JIT")
Fixes: e411901c0b77 ("bpf: allow for tailcalls in BPF subprograms for x64 JIT")
Reviewed-by: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <hffilwlqm@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230912150442.2009-3-hffilwlqm@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

show more ...

bpf: Fix tr dereferencing

Fix 'tr' dereferencing bug when CONFIG_BPF_JIT is turned off.

When CONFIG_BPF_JIT is turned off, 'bpf_trampoline_get()' returns NULL,
which is same as the cases when CONFI

bpf: Fix tr dereferencing

Fix 'tr' dereferencing bug when CONFIG_BPF_JIT is turned off.

When CONFIG_BPF_JIT is turned off, 'bpf_trampoline_get()' returns NULL,
which is same as the cases when CONFIG_BPF_JIT is turned on.

Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/202309131936.5Nc8eUD0-lkp@intel.com/
Fixes: f7b12b6fea00 ("bpf: verifier: refactor check_attach_btf_id()")
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <hffilwlqm@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230917153846.88732-1-hffilwlqm@gmail.com

show more ...

bpf: Annotate bpf_long_memcpy with data_race

syzbot reported a data race splat between two processes trying to
update the same BPF map value via syscall on different CPUs:

BUG: KCSAN: data-race i

bpf: Annotate bpf_long_memcpy with data_race

syzbot reported a data race splat between two processes trying to
update the same BPF map value via syscall on different CPUs:

BUG: KCSAN: data-race in bpf_percpu_array_update / bpf_percpu_array_update

write to 0xffffe8fffe7425d8 of 8 bytes by task 8257 on cpu 1:
bpf_long_memcpy include/linux/bpf.h:428 [inline]
bpf_obj_memcpy include/linux/bpf.h:441 [inline]
copy_map_value_long include/linux/bpf.h:464 [inline]
bpf_percpu_array_update+0x3bb/0x500 kernel/bpf/arraymap.c:380
bpf_map_update_value+0x190/0x370 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:175
generic_map_update_batch+0x3ae/0x4f0 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:1749
bpf_map_do_batch+0x2df/0x3d0 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:4648
__sys_bpf+0x28a/0x780
__do_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5241 [inline]
__se_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5239 [inline]
__x64_sys_bpf+0x43/0x50 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5239
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x41/0xc0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd

write to 0xffffe8fffe7425d8 of 8 bytes by task 8268 on cpu 0:
bpf_long_memcpy include/linux/bpf.h:428 [inline]
bpf_obj_memcpy include/linux/bpf.h:441 [inline]
copy_map_value_long include/linux/bpf.h:464 [inline]
bpf_percpu_array_update+0x3bb/0x500 kernel/bpf/arraymap.c:380
bpf_map_update_value+0x190/0x370 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:175
generic_map_update_batch+0x3ae/0x4f0 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:1749
bpf_map_do_batch+0x2df/0x3d0 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:4648
__sys_bpf+0x28a/0x780
__do_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5241 [inline]
__se_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5239 [inline]
__x64_sys_bpf+0x43/0x50 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5239
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x41/0xc0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd

value changed: 0x0000000000000000 -> 0xfffffff000002788

The bpf_long_memcpy is used with 8-byte aligned pointers, power-of-8 size
and forced to use long read/writes to try to atomically copy long counters.
It is best-effort only and no barriers are here since it _will_ race with
concurrent updates from BPF programs. The bpf_long_memcpy() is called from
bpf(2) syscall. Marco suggested that the best way to make this known to
KCSAN would be to use data_race() annotation.

Reported-by: syzbot+97522333291430dd277f@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Suggested-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/000000000000d87a7f06040c970c@google.com
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/57628f7a15e20d502247c3b55fceb1cb2b31f266.1693342186.git.daniel@iogearbox.net

show more ...

bpf: Consider non-owning refs to refcounted nodes RCU protected

An earlier patch in the series ensures that the underlying memory of
nodes with bpf_refcount - which can have multiple owners - is not

bpf: Consider non-owning refs to refcounted nodes RCU protected

An earlier patch in the series ensures that the underlying memory of
nodes with bpf_refcount - which can have multiple owners - is not reused
until RCU grace period has elapsed. This prevents
use-after-free with non-owning references that may point to
recently-freed memory. While RCU read lock is held, it's safe to
dereference such a non-owning ref, as by definition RCU GP couldn't have
elapsed and therefore underlying memory couldn't have been reused.

From the perspective of verifier "trustedness" non-owning refs to
refcounted nodes are now trusted only in RCU CS and therefore should no
longer pass is_trusted_reg, but rather is_rcu_reg. Let's mark them
MEM_RCU in order to reflect this new state.

Signed-off-by: Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230821193311.3290257-6-davemarchevsky@fb.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

show more ...

bpf: Document struct bpf_struct_ops fields

Subsystems that want to implement a struct bpf_struct_ops structure to
enable struct_ops maps must currently reverse engineer how the structure
works. Give

bpf: Document struct bpf_struct_ops fields

Subsystems that want to implement a struct bpf_struct_ops structure to
enable struct_ops maps must currently reverse engineer how the structure
works. Given that this is meant to be a way for subsystem maintainers to
extend their subsystems using BPF, let's document it to make it a bit
easier on them.

Signed-off-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230814185908.700553-3-void@manifault.com
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>

show more ...

bpf: Remove unused declaration bpf_link_new_file()

Commit a3b80e107894 ("bpf: Allocate ID for bpf_link")
removed the implementation but not the declaration.

Signed-off-by: Yue Haibing <yuehaibing@h

bpf: Remove unused declaration bpf_link_new_file()

Commit a3b80e107894 ("bpf: Allocate ID for bpf_link")
removed the implementation but not the declaration.

Signed-off-by: Yue Haibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230809140556.45836-1-yuehaibing@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>

show more ...

bpf: Add support for bpf_get_func_ip helper for uprobe program

Adding support for bpf_get_func_ip helper for uprobe program to return
probed address for both uprobe and return uprobe.

We discussed

bpf: Add support for bpf_get_func_ip helper for uprobe program

Adding support for bpf_get_func_ip helper for uprobe program to return
probed address for both uprobe and return uprobe.

We discussed this in [1] and agreed that uprobe can have special use
of bpf_get_func_ip helper that differs from kprobe.

The kprobe bpf_get_func_ip returns:
- address of the function if probe is attach on function entry
for both kprobe and return kprobe
- 0 if the probe is not attach on function entry

The uprobe bpf_get_func_ip returns:
- address of the probe for both uprobe and return uprobe

The reason for this semantic change is that kernel can't really tell
if the probe user space address is function entry.

The uprobe program is actually kprobe type program attached as uprobe.
One of the consequences of this design is that uprobes do not have its
own set of helpers, but share them with kprobes.

As we need different functionality for bpf_get_func_ip helper for uprobe,
I'm adding the bool value to the bpf_trace_run_ctx, so the helper can
detect that it's executed in uprobe context and call specific code.

The is_uprobe bool is set as true in bpf_prog_run_array_sleepable, which
is currently used only for executing bpf programs in uprobe.

Renaming bpf_prog_run_array_sleepable to bpf_prog_run_array_uprobe
to address that it's only used for uprobes and that it sets the
run_ctx.is_uprobe as suggested by Yafang Shao.

Suggested-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com>
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAEf4BzZ=xLVkG5eurEuvLU79wAMtwho7ReR+XJAgwhFF4M-7Cg@mail.gmail.com/
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Viktor Malik <vmalik@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230807085956.2344866-2-jolsa@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>

show more ...

bpf: fix bpf_probe_read_kernel prototype mismatch

bpf_probe_read_kernel() has a __weak definition in core.c and another
definition with an incompatible prototype in kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c,
when CO

bpf: fix bpf_probe_read_kernel prototype mismatch

bpf_probe_read_kernel() has a __weak definition in core.c and another
definition with an incompatible prototype in kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c,
when CONFIG_BPF_EVENTS is enabled.

Since the two are incompatible, there cannot be a shared declaration in
a header file, but the lack of a prototype causes a W=1 warning:

kernel/bpf/core.c:1638:12: error: no previous prototype for 'bpf_probe_read_kernel' [-Werror=missing-prototypes]

On 32-bit architectures, the local prototype

u64 __weak bpf_probe_read_kernel(void *dst, u32 size, const void *unsafe_ptr)

passes arguments in other registers as the one in bpf_trace.c

BPF_CALL_3(bpf_probe_read_kernel, void *, dst, u32, size,
const void *, unsafe_ptr)

which uses 64-bit arguments in pairs of registers.

As both versions of the function are fairly simple and only really
differ in one line, just move them into a header file as an inline
function that does not add any overhead for the bpf_trace.c callers
and actually avoids a function call for the other one.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/ac25cb0f-b804-1649-3afb-1dc6138c2716@iogearbox.net/
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230801111449.185301-1-arnd@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

show more ...

bpf: Add 'owner' field to bpf_{list,rb}_node

As described by Kumar in [0], in shared ownership scenarios it is
necessary to do runtime tracking of {rb,list} node ownership - and
synchronize updates

bpf: Add 'owner' field to bpf_{list,rb}_node

As described by Kumar in [0], in shared ownership scenarios it is
necessary to do runtime tracking of {rb,list} node ownership - and
synchronize updates using this ownership information - in order to
prevent races. This patch adds an 'owner' field to struct bpf_list_node
and bpf_rb_node to implement such runtime tracking.

The owner field is a void * that describes the ownership state of a
node. It can have the following values:

NULL - the node is not owned by any data structure
BPF_PTR_POISON - the node is in the process of being added to a data
structure
ptr_to_root - the pointee is a data structure 'root'
(bpf_rb_root / bpf_list_head) which owns this node

The field is initially NULL (set by bpf_obj_init_field default behavior)
and transitions states in the following sequence:

Insertion: NULL -> BPF_PTR_POISON -> ptr_to_root
Removal: ptr_to_root -> NULL

Before a node has been successfully inserted, it is not protected by any
root's lock, and therefore two programs can attempt to add the same node
to different roots simultaneously. For this reason the intermediate
BPF_PTR_POISON state is necessary. For removal, the node is protected
by some root's lock so this intermediate hop isn't necessary.

Note that bpf_list_pop_{front,back} helpers don't need to check owner
before removing as the node-to-be-removed is not passed in as input and
is instead taken directly from the list. Do the check anyways and
WARN_ON_ONCE in this unexpected scenario.

Selftest changes in this patch are entirely mechanical: some BTF
tests have hardcoded struct sizes for structs that contain
bpf_{list,rb}_node fields, those were adjusted to account for the new
sizes. Selftest additions to validate the owner field are added in a
further patch in the series.

[0]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/d7hyspcow5wtjcmw4fugdgyp3fwhljwuscp3xyut5qnwivyeru@ysdq543otzv2

Signed-off-by: Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com>
Suggested-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230718083813.3416104-4-davemarchevsky@fb.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

show more ...

bpf: Introduce internal definitions for UAPI-opaque bpf_{rb,list}_node

Structs bpf_rb_node and bpf_list_node are opaquely defined in
uapi/linux/bpf.h, as BPF program writers are not expected to touc

bpf: Introduce internal definitions for UAPI-opaque bpf_{rb,list}_node

Structs bpf_rb_node and bpf_list_node are opaquely defined in
uapi/linux/bpf.h, as BPF program writers are not expected to touch their
fields - nor does the verifier allow them to do so.

Currently these structs are simple wrappers around structs rb_node and
list_head and linked_list / rbtree implementation just casts and passes
to library functions for those data structures. Later patches in this
series, though, will add an "owner" field to bpf_{rb,list}_node, such
that they're not just wrapping an underlying node type. Moreover, the
bpf linked_list and rbtree implementations will deal with these owner
pointers directly in a few different places.

To avoid having to do

void *owner = (void*)bpf_list_node + sizeof(struct list_head)

with opaque UAPI node types, add bpf_{list,rb}_node_kern struct
definitions to internal headers and modify linked_list and rbtree to use
the internal types where appropriate.

Signed-off-by: Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230718083813.3416104-3-davemarchevsky@fb.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

show more ...

bpf: add percpu stats for bpf_map elements insertions/deletions

Add a generic percpu stats for bpf_map elements insertions/deletions in order
to keep track of both, the current (approximate) number

bpf: add percpu stats for bpf_map elements insertions/deletions

Add a generic percpu stats for bpf_map elements insertions/deletions in order
to keep track of both, the current (approximate) number of elements in a map
and per-cpu statistics on update/delete operations.

To expose these stats a particular map implementation should initialize the
counter and adjust it as needed using the 'bpf_map_*_elem_count' helpers
provided by this commit.

Signed-off-by: Anton Protopopov <aspsk@isovalent.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230706133932.45883-2-aspsk@isovalent.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

show more ...

bpf: Support O_PATH FDs in BPF_OBJ_PIN and BPF_OBJ_GET commands

Current UAPI of BPF_OBJ_PIN and BPF_OBJ_GET commands of bpf() syscall
forces users to specify pinning location as a string-based absol

bpf: Support O_PATH FDs in BPF_OBJ_PIN and BPF_OBJ_GET commands

Current UAPI of BPF_OBJ_PIN and BPF_OBJ_GET commands of bpf() syscall
forces users to specify pinning location as a string-based absolute or
relative (to current working directory) path. This has various
implications related to security (e.g., symlink-based attacks), forces
BPF FS to be exposed in the file system, which can cause races with
other applications.

One of the feedbacks we got from folks working with containers heavily
was that inability to use purely FD-based location specification was an
unfortunate limitation and hindrance for BPF_OBJ_PIN and BPF_OBJ_GET
commands. This patch closes this oversight, adding path_fd field to
BPF_OBJ_PIN and BPF_OBJ_GET UAPI, following conventions established by
*at() syscalls for dirfd + pathname combinations.

This now allows interesting possibilities like working with detached BPF
FS mount (e.g., to perform multiple pinnings without running a risk of
someone interfering with them), and generally making pinning/getting
more secure and not prone to any races and/or security attacks.

This is demonstrated by a selftest added in subsequent patch that takes
advantage of new mount APIs (fsopen, fsconfig, fsmount) to demonstrate
creating detached BPF FS mount, pinning, and then getting BPF map out of
it, all while never exposing this private instance of BPF FS to outside
worlds.

Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Reviewed-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230523170013.728457-4-andrii@kernel.org

show more ...

bpf: Remove bpf trampoline selector

After commit e21aa341785c ("bpf: Fix fexit trampoline."), the selector is only
used to indicate how many times the bpf trampoline image are updated and been
displ

bpf: Remove bpf trampoline selector

After commit e21aa341785c ("bpf: Fix fexit trampoline."), the selector is only
used to indicate how many times the bpf trampoline image are updated and been
displayed in the trampoline ksym name. After the trampoline is freed, the
selector will start from 0 again. So the selector is a useless value to the
user. We can remove it.

If the user want to check whether the bpf trampoline image has been updated
or not, the user can compare the address. Each time the trampoline image is
updated, the address will change consequently. Jiri also pointed out another
issue that perf is still using the old name "bpf_trampoline_%lu", so this
change can fix the issue in perf.

Fixes: e21aa341785c ("bpf: Fix fexit trampoline.")
Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/ZFvOOlrmHiY9AgXE@krava
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230515130849.57502-3-laoar.shao@gmail.com

show more ...

bpf: Add bpf_dynptr_size

bpf_dynptr_size returns the number of usable bytes in a dynptr.

Signed-off-by: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Sign

bpf: Add bpf_dynptr_size

bpf_dynptr_size returns the number of usable bytes in a dynptr.

Signed-off-by: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230420071414.570108-4-joannelkoong@gmail.com

show more ...

bpf: add test_run support for netfilter program type

add glue code so a bpf program can be run using userspace-provided
netfilter state and packet/skb.

Default is to use ipv4:output hook point, but

bpf: add test_run support for netfilter program type

add glue code so a bpf program can be run using userspace-provided
netfilter state and packet/skb.

Default is to use ipv4:output hook point, but this can be overridden by
userspace. Userspace provided netfilter state is restricted, only hook and
protocol families can be overridden and only to ipv4/ipv6.

Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230421170300.24115-7-fw@strlen.de
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

show more ...

bpf: Centralize btf_field-specific initialization logic

All btf_fields in an object are 0-initialized by memset in
bpf_obj_init. This might not be a valid initial state for some field
types, in whic

bpf: Centralize btf_field-specific initialization logic

All btf_fields in an object are 0-initialized by memset in
bpf_obj_init. This might not be a valid initial state for some field
types, in which case kfuncs that use the type will properly initialize
their input if it's been 0-initialized. Some BPF graph collection types
and kfuncs do this: bpf_list_{head,node} and bpf_rb_node.

An earlier patch in this series added the bpf_refcount field, for which
the 0 state indicates that the refcounted object should be free'd.
bpf_obj_init treats this field specially, setting refcount to 1 instead
of relying on scattered "refcount is 0? Must have just been initialized,
let's set to 1" logic in kfuncs.

This patch extends this treatment to list and rbtree field types,
allowing most scattered initialization logic in kfuncs to be removed.

Note that bpf_{list_head,rb_root} may be inside a BPF map, in which case
they'll be 0-initialized without passing through the newly-added logic,
so scattered initialization logic must remain for these collection root
types.

Signed-off-by: Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230415201811.343116-9-davemarchevsky@fb.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

show more ...

bpf: Support refcounted local kptrs in existing semantics

A local kptr is considered 'refcounted' when it is of a type that has a
bpf_refcount field. When such a kptr is created, its refcount should

bpf: Support refcounted local kptrs in existing semantics

A local kptr is considered 'refcounted' when it is of a type that has a
bpf_refcount field. When such a kptr is created, its refcount should be
initialized to 1; when destroyed, the object should be free'd only if a
refcount decr results in 0 refcount.

Existing logic always frees the underlying memory when destroying a
local kptr, and 0-initializes all btf_record fields. This patch adds
checks for "is local kptr refcounted?" and new logic for that case in
the appropriate places.

This patch focuses on changing existing semantics and thus conspicuously
does _not_ provide a way for BPF programs in increment refcount. That
follows later in the series.

__bpf_obj_drop_impl is modified to do the right thing when it sees a
refcounted type. Container types for graph nodes (list, tree, stashed in
map) are migrated to use __bpf_obj_drop_impl as a destructor for their
nodes instead of each having custom destruction code in their _free
paths. Now that "drop" isn't a synonym for "free" when the type is
refcounted it makes sense to centralize this logic.

Signed-off-by: Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230415201811.343116-4-davemarchevsky@fb.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

show more ...

bpf: Introduce opaque bpf_refcount struct and add btf_record plumbing

A 'struct bpf_refcount' is added to the set of opaque uapi/bpf.h types
meant for use in BPF programs. Similarly to other opaque

bpf: Introduce opaque bpf_refcount struct and add btf_record plumbing

A 'struct bpf_refcount' is added to the set of opaque uapi/bpf.h types
meant for use in BPF programs. Similarly to other opaque types like
bpf_spin_lock and bpf_rbtree_node, the verifier needs to know where in
user-defined struct types a bpf_refcount can be located, so necessary
btf_record plumbing is added to enable this. bpf_refcount is sized to
hold a refcount_t.

Similarly to bpf_spin_lock, the offset of a bpf_refcount is cached in
btf_record as refcount_off in addition to being in the field array.
Caching refcount_off makes sense for this field because further patches
in the series will modify functions that take local kptrs (e.g.
bpf_obj_drop) to change their behavior if the type they're operating on
is refcounted. So enabling fast "is this type refcounted?" checks is
desirable.

No such verifier behavior changes are introduced in this patch, just
logic to recognize 'struct bpf_refcount' in btf_record.

Signed-off-by: Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230415201811.343116-3-davemarchevsky@fb.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

show more ...

bpf: Remove btf_field_offs, use btf_record's fields instead

The btf_field_offs struct contains (offset, size) for btf_record fields,
sorted by offset. btf_field_offs is always used in conjunction wi

bpf: Remove btf_field_offs, use btf_record's fields instead

The btf_field_offs struct contains (offset, size) for btf_record fields,
sorted by offset. btf_field_offs is always used in conjunction with
btf_record, which has btf_field 'fields' array with (offset, type), the
latter of which btf_field_offs' size is derived from via
btf_field_type_size.

This patch adds a size field to struct btf_field and sorts btf_record's
fields by offset, making it possible to get rid of btf_field_offs. Less
data duplication and less code complexity results.

Since btf_field_offs' lifetime closely followed the btf_record used to
populate it, most complexity wins are from removal of initialization
code like:

if (btf_record_successfully_initialized) {
foffs = btf_parse_field_offs(rec);
if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(foffs))
// free the btf_record and return err
}

Other changes in this patch are pretty mechanical:

* foffs->field_off[i] -> rec->fields[i].offset
* foffs->field_sz[i] -> rec->fields[i].size
* Sort rec->fields in btf_parse_fields before returning
* It's possible that this is necessary independently of other
changes in this patch. btf_record_find in syscall.c expects
btf_record's fields to be sorted by offset, yet there's no
explicit sorting of them before this patch, record's fields are
populated in the order they're read from BTF struct definition.
BTF docs don't say anything about the sortedness of struct fields.
* All functions taking struct btf_field_offs * input now instead take
struct btf_record *. All callsites of these functions already have
access to the correct btf_record.

Signed-off-by: Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230415201811.343116-2-davemarchevsky@fb.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

show more ...

bpf: Support 64-bit pointers to kfuncs

test_ksyms_module fails to emit a kfunc call targeting a module on
s390x, because the verifier stores the difference between kfunc
address and __bpf_call_base

bpf: Support 64-bit pointers to kfuncs

test_ksyms_module fails to emit a kfunc call targeting a module on
s390x, because the verifier stores the difference between kfunc
address and __bpf_call_base in bpf_insn.imm, which is s32, and modules
are roughly (1 << 42) bytes away from the kernel on s390x.

Fix by keeping BTF id in bpf_insn.imm for BPF_PSEUDO_KFUNC_CALLs,
and storing the absolute address in bpf_kfunc_desc.

Introduce bpf_jit_supports_far_kfunc_call() in order to limit this new
behavior to the s390x JIT. Otherwise other JITs need to be modified,
which is not desired.

Introduce bpf_get_kfunc_addr() instead of exposing both
find_kfunc_desc() and struct bpf_kfunc_desc.

In addition to sorting kfuncs by imm, also sort them by offset, in
order to handle conflicting imms from different modules. Do this on
all architectures in order to simplify code.

Factor out resolving specialized kfuncs (XPD and dynptr) from
fixup_kfunc_call(). This was required in the first place, because
fixup_kfunc_call() uses find_kfunc_desc(), which returns a const
pointer, so it's not possible to modify kfunc addr without stripping
const, which is not nice. It also removes repetition of code like:

if (bpf_jit_supports_far_kfunc_call())
desc->addr = func;
else
insn->imm = BPF_CALL_IMM(func);

and separates kfunc_desc_tab fixups from kfunc_call fixups.

Suggested-by: Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230412230632.885985-1-iii@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

show more ...