Home
last modified time | relevance | path

Searched full:there (Results 1 – 25 of 4352) sorted by relevance

12345678910>>...175

/openbmc/linux/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/arm64/arm/cortex-a55/
Dpipeline.json
/openbmc/linux/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/arm64/arm/cortex-a510/
Dpipeline.json
/openbmc/linux/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/arm64/arm/cortex-a53/
Dpipeline.json
/openbmc/linux/Documentation/locking/
Drobust-futexes.rst
/openbmc/linux/Documentation/timers/
Dno_hz.rst
/openbmc/u-boot/arch/mips/mach-bmips/
H A DKconfig136 Between its different peripherals there's an integrated switch with 4
147 Between its different peripherals there's an integrated switch with 4
158 Between its different peripherals there's an integrated switch with 4
169 Between its different peripherals there's a BCM5325 switch with 4
180 Between its different peripherals there's an integrated switch with 4
191 Between its different peripherals there's a BCM53115 switch with 5
202 Between its different peripherals there's a BCM5325 switch with 4
213 Between its different peripherals there's a BCM53115 switch with 4
224 Between its different peripherals there's a BCM53125 switch with 5
235 Between its different peripherals there's a BCM5325 switch with 4
[all …]
/openbmc/linux/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/arm64/arm/neoverse-n1/
Dtlb.json
/openbmc/linux/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/arm64/arm/neoverse-n2-v2/
Dtlb.json
/openbmc/linux/Documentation/process/
D6.Followthrough.rst
D3.Early-stage.rst
D8.Conclusion.rst
/openbmc/u-boot/doc/
H A DREADME.sched16 - There are NO primitives for thread synchronization (locking,
27 - There are NO priorities, and the scheduling policy is round-robin
30 - There are NO capabilities to collect thread CPU usage, scheduler
47 - There NOT enough safety checks as are probably in the other
50 - There is no parent-child relationship between threads. Only one
/openbmc/linux/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/x86/broadwellx/
Duncore-power.json
/openbmc/u-boot/include/dm/
H A Duclass.h24 * There may be drivers for on-chip SoC GPIO banks, I2C GPIO expanders and
122 * @ucp: Returns pointer to uclass (there is only one per ID)
150 * @devp: Returns pointer to device (there is only one per for each ID)
173 * If an active device has this sequence it will be returned. If there is no
181 * @devp: Returns pointer to device (there is only one for each seq)
196 * @devp: Returns pointer to device (there is only one for each node)
212 * @devp: Returns pointer to device (there is only one for each node)
227 * @devp: Returns pointer to device (there is only one for each node)
228 * @return 0 if OK, -ENODEV if there is no device match the phandle, other
244 * @devp: Returns pointer to device (there is only one for each node)
[all …]
/openbmc/linux/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/x86/broadwellde/
Duncore-power.json
/openbmc/linux/Documentation/networking/device_drivers/ethernet/toshiba/
Dspider_net.rst
/openbmc/linux/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/
DZ6.0+pooncerelease+poacquirerelease+fencembonceonce.litmus
/openbmc/linux/Documentation/filesystems/
Ddebugfs.rst
/openbmc/linux/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/x86/haswellx/
Duncore-power.json
/openbmc/phosphor-logging/extensions/openpower-pels/registry/tools/
H A Dvalidate_registry.py16 Check that there aren't any message registry entries with the same
17 'Name' field. There may be a use case for this in the future, but there
33 Check that there aren't any message registry entries with the same
83 Check that if the Message field uses the '%' style placeholders that there
85 the MessageArgSources field is present but only if there are placeholders.
/openbmc/openbmc/poky/meta/conf/distro/include/
H A Dcve-extra-exclusions.inc2 # or there is no reasonable action the Yocto Project can take to resolve the issue.
25 There has been much discussion amongst the epiphany and webkit developers and \
26 whilst there are improvements about how domains are handled and displayed to the user \
27 there is unlikely ever to be a single fix to webkit or epiphany which addresses this \
28 problem. There isn't any mitigation or fix or way to progress this further."
70 There was a proposed patch https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2021-02/msg06098.html \
76 There was a proposed patch but rejected by upstream qemu. It is unclear if the issue can \
83 wouldn't expose an assembler. The upstream is inactive and there is little to be \
/openbmc/linux/Documentation/power/
Dbasic-pm-debugging.rst
/openbmc/linux/Documentation/userspace-api/media/rc/
Drc-protos.rst
/openbmc/linux/tools/testing/selftests/media_tests/
Dmedia_dev_allocator.sh
/openbmc/sdbusplus/include/sdbusplus/async/stdexec/__detail/
H A D__manual_lifetime.hpp50 //! There are no safeties guarding against the case that there's already one
51 //! there.
63 //! There are no safeties guarding against the case that there's already one
64 //! there.

12345678910>>...175