block: Protect bs->file with graph_lock

Almost all functions that access bs->file already take the graph
lock now. Add locking to the remaining users and finally annotate the
struct field itself as

block: Protect bs->file with graph_lock

Almost all functions that access bs->file already take the graph
lock now. Add locking to the remaining users and finally annotate the
struct field itself as protected by the graph lock.

Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20231027155333.420094-25-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...

block: Add missing GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations

This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK to some driver callbacks that are already called
with the graph lock held, and which will need the annotation because
they access b

block: Add missing GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations

This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK to some driver callbacks that are already called
with the graph lock held, and which will need the annotation because
they access bs->file, but don't have it yet.

This also covers a few callbacks that were not marked GRAPH_RDLOCK
before, but where updating BlockDriver is trivially possible.

Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20231027155333.420094-21-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...

block: Introduce bdrv_co_change_backing_file()

bdrv_change_backing_file() is called both inside and outside coroutine
context. This makes it difficult for it to take the graph lock
internally. It al

block: Introduce bdrv_co_change_backing_file()

bdrv_change_backing_file() is called both inside and outside coroutine
context. This makes it difficult for it to take the graph lock
internally. It also means that driver implementations need to be able to
run outside of coroutines, too. Switch it to the usual model with a
coroutine based implementation and a co_wrapper instead. The new
function is marked GRAPH_RDLOCK.

As the co_wrapper now runs the function in the AioContext of the node
(as it should always have done), this is not GLOBAL_STATE_CODE() any
more.

Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20231027155333.420094-20-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...

block: Protect bs->backing with graph_lock

Almost all functions that access bs->backing already take the graph
lock now. Add locking to the remaining users and finally annotate the
struct field itse

block: Protect bs->backing with graph_lock

Almost all functions that access bs->backing already take the graph
lock now. Add locking to the remaining users and finally annotate the
struct field itself as protected by the graph lock.

Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20231027155333.420094-18-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...

block: mark mixed functions that can suspend

The marking should be extended transitively to all functions that call
these ones, so that static analysis can be done much more efficiently.
However, th

block: mark mixed functions that can suspend

The marking should be extended transitively to all functions that call
these ones, so that static analysis can be done much more efficiently.
However, this is a start and makes it possible to use vrc's path-based
searches to find potential bugs where coroutine_fns call blocking functions.

Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>

show more ...

block: use bdrv_co_debug_event in coroutine context

bdrv_co_debug_event was recently introduced, with bdrv_debug_event
becoming a wrapper for use in unknown context. Because most of the
time bdrv_d

block: use bdrv_co_debug_event in coroutine context

bdrv_co_debug_event was recently introduced, with bdrv_debug_event
becoming a wrapper for use in unknown context. Because most of the
time bdrv_debug_event is used on a BdrvChild via the wrapper macro
BLKDBG_EVENT, introduce a similar macro BLKDBG_CO_EVENT that calls
bdrv_co_debug_event, and switch whenever possible.

Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20230601115145.196465-13-pbonzini@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...

qed: mark more functions as coroutine_fns and GRAPH_RDLOCK

Mark functions as coroutine_fn when they are only called by other coroutine_fns
and they can suspend. Change calls to co_wrappers to use t

qed: mark more functions as coroutine_fns and GRAPH_RDLOCK

Mark functions as coroutine_fn when they are only called by other coroutine_fns
and they can suspend. Change calls to co_wrappers to use the non-wrapped
functions, which in turn requires adding GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations.

Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20230601115145.196465-3-pbonzini@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...

block: Call .bdrv_co_create(_opts) unlocked

These are functions that modify the graph, so they must be able to take
a writer lock. This is impossible if they already hold the reader lock.
If they ne

block: Call .bdrv_co_create(_opts) unlocked

These are functions that modify the graph, so they must be able to take
a writer lock. This is impossible if they already hold the reader lock.
If they need a reader lock for some of their operations, they should
take it internally.

Many of them go through blk_*(), which will always take the lock itself.
Direct calls of bdrv_*() need to take the reader lock. Note that while
locking for bdrv_co_*() calls is checked by TSA, this is not the case
for the mixed_coroutine_fns bdrv_*(). Holding the lock is still required
when they are called from coroutine context like here!

This effectively reverts 4ec8df0183, but adds some internal locking
instead.

Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230510203601.418015-2-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...

block: .bdrv_open is non-coroutine and unlocked

Drivers were a bit confused about whether .bdrv_open can run in a
coroutine and whether or not it holds a graph lock.

It cannot keep a graph lock fro

block: .bdrv_open is non-coroutine and unlocked

Drivers were a bit confused about whether .bdrv_open can run in a
coroutine and whether or not it holds a graph lock.

It cannot keep a graph lock from the caller across the whole function
because it both changes the graph (requires a writer lock) and does I/O
(requires a reader lock). Therefore, it should take these locks
internally as needed.

The functions used to be called in coroutine context during image
creation. This was buggy for other reasons, and as of commit 32192301,
all block drivers go through no_co_wrappers. So it is not called in
coroutine context any more.

Fix qcow2 and qed to work with the correct assumptions: The graph lock
needs to be taken internally instead of just assuming it's already
there, and the coroutine path is dead code that can be removed.

Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230504115750.54437-9-kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...

block: bdrv/blk_co_unref() for calls in coroutine context

These functions must not be called in coroutine context, because they
need write access to the graph.

Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org
Signed-off

block: bdrv/blk_co_unref() for calls in coroutine context

These functions must not be called in coroutine context, because they
need write access to the graph.

Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230504115750.54437-4-kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...

qed: remove spurious BDRV_POLL_WHILE()

This looks like a copy-paste or merge error. BDRV_POLL_WHILE() is
already called above. It's not needed in the qemu_in_coroutine() case.

Fixes: 9fb4dfc570ce (

qed: remove spurious BDRV_POLL_WHILE()

This looks like a copy-paste or merge error. BDRV_POLL_WHILE() is
already called above. It's not needed in the qemu_in_coroutine() case.

Fixes: 9fb4dfc570ce ("qed: make bdrv_qed_do_open a coroutine_fn")
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230309163134.398707-1-stefanha@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...

block: Mark bdrv_co_create() and callers GRAPH_RDLOCK

This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_co_create() need to hold a reader lock for the graph.

Signed-off-by: Emanuel

block: Mark bdrv_co_create() and callers GRAPH_RDLOCK

This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_co_create() need to hold a reader lock for the graph.

Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230203152202.49054-17-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...

block: Mark public read/write functions GRAPH_RDLOCK

This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_co_pread*/pwrite*() need to hold a reader lock for the graph.

For some places

block: Mark public read/write functions GRAPH_RDLOCK

This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_co_pread*/pwrite*() need to hold a reader lock for the graph.

For some places, we know that they will hold the lock, but we don't have
the GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations yet. In this case, add assume_graph_lock()
with a FIXME comment. These places will be removed once everything is
properly annotated.

Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230203152202.49054-12-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...

block: Mark read/write in block/io.c GRAPH_RDLOCK

This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_driver_*() need to hold a reader lock for the graph. It doesn't add
the annotatio

block: Mark read/write in block/io.c GRAPH_RDLOCK

This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_driver_*() need to hold a reader lock for the graph. It doesn't add
the annotation to public functions yet.

For some places, we know that they will hold the lock, but we don't have
the GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations yet. In this case, add assume_graph_lock()
with a FIXME comment. These places will be removed once everything is
properly annotated.

Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230203152202.49054-11-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...

block: Mark bdrv_co_pwrite_zeroes() and callers GRAPH_RDLOCK

This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_co_pwrite_zeroes() need to hold a reader lock for the graph.

For some

block: Mark bdrv_co_pwrite_zeroes() and callers GRAPH_RDLOCK

This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_co_pwrite_zeroes() need to hold a reader lock for the graph.

For some places, we know that they will hold the lock, but we don't have
the GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations yet. In this case, add assume_graph_lock()
with a FIXME comment. These places will be removed once everything is
properly annotated.

Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230203152202.49054-10-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...

block: Mark bdrv_co_flush() and callers GRAPH_RDLOCK

This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_co_flush() need to hold a reader lock for the graph.

For some places, we know

block: Mark bdrv_co_flush() and callers GRAPH_RDLOCK

This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of
bdrv_co_flush() need to hold a reader lock for the graph.

For some places, we know that they will hold the lock, but we don't have
the GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations yet. In this case, add assume_graph_lock()
with a FIXME comment. These places will be removed once everything is
properly annotated.

Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230203152202.49054-8-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...

block/qed: add missing graph rdlock in qed_need_check_timer_entry

This function is called in two different places:
- timer callback, which does not take the graph rdlock.
- bdrv_qed_drain_begin(), w

block/qed: add missing graph rdlock in qed_need_check_timer_entry

This function is called in two different places:
- timer callback, which does not take the graph rdlock.
- bdrv_qed_drain_begin(), which is .bdrv_drain_begin()
callback documented as function that does not take the lock.

Since it calls recursive functions that traverse the
graph, we need to protect them with the graph rdlock.

Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230203152202.49054-7-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...

qed: Fix .bdrv_co_create(_opts) to open images with no_co_wrapper

.bdrv_co_create implementations run in a coroutine. Therefore they are
not allowed to open images directly. Fix the calls to use the

qed: Fix .bdrv_co_create(_opts) to open images with no_co_wrapper

.bdrv_co_create implementations run in a coroutine. Therefore they are
not allowed to open images directly. Fix the calls to use the
corresponding no_co_wrappers instead.

Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230126172432.436111-8-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Hanna Czenczek <hreitz@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...

block: Convert bdrv_get_info() to co_wrapper_mixed

bdrv_get_info() is categorized as an I/O function, and it currently
doesn't run in a coroutine. We should let it take a graph rdlock since
it trave

block: Convert bdrv_get_info() to co_wrapper_mixed

bdrv_get_info() is categorized as an I/O function, and it currently
doesn't run in a coroutine. We should let it take a graph rdlock since
it traverses the block nodes graph, which however is only possible in a
coroutine.

Therefore turn it into a co_wrapper to move the actual function into a
coroutine where the lock can be taken.

Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230113204212.359076-11-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...

block: use bdrv_co_refresh_total_sectors when possible

In some places we are sure we are always running in a
coroutine, therefore it's useless to call the generated_co_wrapper,
instead call directly

block: use bdrv_co_refresh_total_sectors when possible

In some places we are sure we are always running in a
coroutine, therefore it's useless to call the generated_co_wrapper,
instead call directly the _co_ function.

Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230113204212.359076-9-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...

block: Convert bdrv_refresh_total_sectors() to co_wrapper_mixed

BlockDriver->bdrv_getlength is categorized as IO callback, and it
currently doesn't run in a coroutine. We should let it take a graph

block: Convert bdrv_refresh_total_sectors() to co_wrapper_mixed

BlockDriver->bdrv_getlength is categorized as IO callback, and it
currently doesn't run in a coroutine. We should let it take a graph
rdlock since the callback traverses the block nodes graph, which however
is only possible in a coroutine.

Therefore turn it into a co_wrapper to move the actual function into a
coroutine where the lock can be taken.

Because now this function creates a new coroutine and polls, we need to
take the AioContext lock where it is missing, for the only reason that
internally co_wrapper calls AIO_WAIT_WHILE and it expects to release the
AioContext lock.

This is especially messy when a co_wrapper creates a coroutine and polls
in bdrv_open_driver, because this function has so many callers in so
many context that it can easily lead to deadlocks. Therefore the new
rule for bdrv_open_driver is that the caller must always hold the
AioContext lock of the given bs (except if it is a coroutine), because
the function calls bdrv_refresh_total_sectors() which is now a
co_wrapper.

Once the rwlock is ultimated and placed in every place it needs to be,
we will poll using AIO_WAIT_WHILE_UNLOCKED and remove the AioContext
lock.

Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230113204212.359076-7-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...

block: bdrv_create_file is a coroutine_fn

It is always called in coroutine_fn callbacks, therefore
it can directly call bdrv_co_create().

Rename it to bdrv_co_create_file too.

Signed-off-by: Emanu

block: bdrv_create_file is a coroutine_fn

It is always called in coroutine_fn callbacks, therefore
it can directly call bdrv_co_create().

Rename it to bdrv_co_create_file too.

Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
Message-Id: <20221128142337.657646-9-eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...

block: Revert .bdrv_drained_begin/end to non-coroutine_fn

Polling during bdrv_drained_end() can be problematic (and in the future,
we may get cases for bdrv_drained_begin() where polling is forbidde

block: Revert .bdrv_drained_begin/end to non-coroutine_fn

Polling during bdrv_drained_end() can be problematic (and in the future,
we may get cases for bdrv_drained_begin() where polling is forbidden,
and we don't care about already in-flight requests, but just want to
prevent new requests from arriving).

The .bdrv_drained_begin/end callbacks running in a coroutine is the only
reason why we have to do this polling, so make them non-coroutine
callbacks again. None of the callers actually yield any more.

This means that bdrv_drained_end() effectively doesn't poll any more,
even if AIO_WAIT_WHILE() loops are still there (their condition is false
from the beginning). This is generally not a problem, but in
test-bdrv-drain, some additional explicit aio_poll() calls need to be
added because the test case wants to verify the final state after BHs
have executed.

Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20221118174110.55183-4-kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...

qed: Don't yield in bdrv_qed_co_drain_begin()

We want to change .bdrv_co_drained_begin() back to be a non-coroutine
callback, so in preparation, avoid yielding in its implementation.

Because we inc

qed: Don't yield in bdrv_qed_co_drain_begin()

We want to change .bdrv_co_drained_begin() back to be a non-coroutine
callback, so in preparation, avoid yielding in its implementation.

Because we increase bs->in_flight and bdrv_drained_begin() polls, the
behaviour is unchanged.

Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20221118174110.55183-2-kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

show more ...

qapi block: Elide redundant has_FOO in generated C

The has_FOO for pointer-valued FOO are redundant, except for arrays.
They are also a nuisance to work with. Recent commit "qapi: Start to
elide re

qapi block: Elide redundant has_FOO in generated C

The has_FOO for pointer-valued FOO are redundant, except for arrays.
They are also a nuisance to work with. Recent commit "qapi: Start to
elide redundant has_FOO in generated C" provided the means to elide
them step by step. This is the step for qapi/block*.json.

Said commit explains the transformation in more detail.

There is one instance of the invariant violation mentioned there:
qcow2_signal_corruption() passes false, "" when node_name is an empty
string. Take care to pass NULL then.

The previous two commits cleaned up two more.

Additionally, helper bdrv_latency_histogram_stats() loses its output
parameters and returns a value instead.

Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Cc: Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-block@nongnu.org
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20221104160712.3005652-11-armbru@redhat.com>
[Fixes for #ifndef LIBRBD_SUPPORTS_ENCRYPTION and MacOS squashed in]

show more ...