selftests/mm: add tests for HWPOISON hugetlbfs read

Add tests for the improvement made to read operation on HWPOISON
hugetlb page with different read granularities. For each chunk size,
three read s

selftests/mm: add tests for HWPOISON hugetlbfs read

Add tests for the improvement made to read operation on HWPOISON
hugetlb page with different read granularities. For each chunk size,
three read scenarios are tested:
1. Simple regression test on read without HWPOISON.
2. Sequential read page by page should succeed until encounters the 1st
raw HWPOISON subpage.
3. After skip a raw HWPOISON subpage by lseek, read()s always succeed.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230713001833.3778937-5-jiaqiyan@google.com
Signed-off-by: Jiaqi Yan <jiaqiyan@google.com>
Acked-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>
Cc: James Houghton <jthoughton@google.com>
Cc: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Cc: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>

show more ...

selftests/mm: .gitignore: add mkdirty, va_high_addr_switch

These new build products were left out of .gitignore, so add them now.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230606071637.267103-6-jhubbard@nv

selftests/mm: .gitignore: add mkdirty, va_high_addr_switch

These new build products were left out of .gitignore, so add them now.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230606071637.267103-6-jhubbard@nvidia.com
Signed-off-by: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@collabora.com>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>

show more ...

selftests/mm: gup_longterm: new functional test for FOLL_LONGTERM

Let's add a new test for checking whether GUP long-term page pinning works
as expected (R/O vs. R/W, MAP_PRIVATE vs. MAP_SHARED, G

selftests/mm: gup_longterm: new functional test for FOLL_LONGTERM

Let's add a new test for checking whether GUP long-term page pinning works
as expected (R/O vs. R/W, MAP_PRIVATE vs. MAP_SHARED, GUP vs.
GUP-fast). Note that COW handling with long-term R/O pinning in private
mappings, and pinning of anonymous memory in general, is tested by the COW
selftest. This test, therefore, focuses on page pinning in file mappings.

The most interesting case is probably the "local tmpfile" case, as that
will likely end up on a "real" filesystem such as ext4 or xfs, not on a
virtual one like tmpfs or hugetlb where any long-term page pinning is
always expected to succeed.

For now, only add tests that use the "/sys/kernel/debug/gup_test"
interface. We'll add tests based on liburing separately next.

[akpm@linux-foundation.org: update .gitignore for gup_longterm, per Peter]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230519102723.185721-3-david@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@gmail.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>

show more ...

selftests/mm: split uffd tests into uffd-stress and uffd-unit-tests

In many ways it's weird and unwanted to keep all the tests in the same
userfaultfd.c at least when still in the current way.

For

selftests/mm: split uffd tests into uffd-stress and uffd-unit-tests

In many ways it's weird and unwanted to keep all the tests in the same
userfaultfd.c at least when still in the current way.

For example, it doesn't make much sense to run the stress test for each
method we can create an userfaultfd handle (either via syscall or /dev/
node). It's a waste of time running this twice for the whole stress as
the stress paths are the same, only the open path is different.

It's also just weird to need to manually specify different types of memory
to run all unit tests for the userfaultfd interface. We should be able to
just run a single program and that should go through all functional uffd
tests without running the stress test at all. The stress test was more
for torturing and finding race conditions. We don't want to wait for
stress to finish just to regress test a functional test.

When we start to pile up more things on top of the same file and same
functions, things start to go a bit chaos and the code is just harder to
maintain too with tons of global variables.

This patch creates a new test uffd-unit-tests to keep userfaultfd unit
tests in the future, currently empty.

Meanwhile rename the old userfaultfd.c test to uffd-stress.c.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230412164244.328270-1-peterx@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Dmitry Safonov <0x7f454c46@gmail.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Zach O'Keefe <zokeefe@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>

show more ...

selftests/mm: update .gitignore with two missing tests

Patch series "selftests/mm: Split / Refactor userfault test", v2.

This patchset splits userfaultfd.c into two tests:

- uffd-stress: the "va

selftests/mm: update .gitignore with two missing tests

Patch series "selftests/mm: Split / Refactor userfault test", v2.

This patchset splits userfaultfd.c into two tests:

- uffd-stress: the "vanilla", old and powerful stress test
- uffd-unit-tests: all the unit tests will be moved here

This is on my todo list for a long time but I never did it for real. The
uffd test is growing into a small and cute monster. I start to notice it's
going harder to maintain such a test and make it useful.

A few issues I found when looking at userfaultfd test:

- We have a bunch of unit tests in userfaultfd.c, but they always need to
be run only after a stress type. No way to not do it.

- We can only run an unit test for one memory type only, if we want to
do a quick smoke test to check regressions, there's no good way. The
best to come currently is "bash ./run_vmtests.sh -t userfaultfd" thanks
to the most recent changes to run_vmtests.sh on tagging. Still, that
needs to run the stress tests always and hard to see what's wrong.

- It's hard to add a new unit test to userfaultfd.c, we don't really know
what's happening, not until we mostly read the whole file.

- We did a bunch of useless tests, e.g. we run twice the whole suite of
stress test just to verify both syscall and /dev/userfaultfd. They're
all using userfaultfd_new() to create the handle, everything should
really be the same underneath. One simple unit test should cover that!

- We have tens of global variables in one file but shared with all the
tests. Some of them are not suitable to be a global var from
maintainance pov. It enforces every unit test to consider how these
vars affects the stress test and vice versa, but that's logically not
necessary.

- Userfaultfd test is not friendly to old kernels. Mostly it only works
on the latest kernel tree. It's preferrable to be run on all kernels
and properly report what's missing.

I'll stop here, I feel like I can still list some..

This patchset should resolve all issues above, and actually we can do even
more on top. I stopped doing that until I found I already got 29 patches
and 2000+ LOC changes. That's already a patchset terrible enough so we
should move in small steps.

After the whole set applied, "./run_vmtests.sh -t userfaultfd" looks like
this:

===8<===
vm.nr_hugepages = 1024
-------------------------
running ./uffd-unit-tests
-------------------------
Testing UFFDIO_API (with syscall)... done
Testing UFFDIO_API (with /dev/userfaultfd)... done
Testing register-ioctls on anon... done
Testing register-ioctls on shmem... done
Testing register-ioctls on shmem-private... done
Testing register-ioctls on hugetlb... done
Testing register-ioctls on hugetlb-private... done
Testing zeropage on anon... done
Testing zeropage on shmem... done
Testing zeropage on shmem-private... done
Testing zeropage on hugetlb... done
Testing zeropage on hugetlb-private... done
Testing pagemap on anon... done
Testing wp-unpopulated on anon... done
Testing minor on shmem... done
Testing minor on hugetlb... done
Testing minor-wp on shmem... done
Testing minor-wp on hugetlb... done
Testing minor-collapse on shmem... done
Testing sigbus on anon... done
Testing sigbus on shmem... done
Testing sigbus on shmem-private... done
Testing sigbus on hugetlb... done
Testing sigbus on hugetlb-private... done
Testing sigbus-wp on anon... done
Testing sigbus-wp on shmem... done
Testing sigbus-wp on shmem-private... done
Testing sigbus-wp on hugetlb... done
Testing sigbus-wp on hugetlb-private... done
Testing events on anon... done
Testing events on shmem... done
Testing events on shmem-private... done
Testing events on hugetlb... done
Testing events on hugetlb-private... done
Testing events-wp on anon... done
Testing events-wp on shmem... done
Testing events-wp on shmem-private... done
Testing events-wp on hugetlb... done
Testing events-wp on hugetlb-private... done
Userfaults unit tests: pass=39, skip=0, fail=0 (total=39)
[PASS]
--------------------------------
running ./uffd-stress anon 20 16
--------------------------------
nr_pages: 5120, nr_pages_per_cpu: 640
bounces: 15, mode: rnd racing ver poll, userfaults: 345 missing (26+48+61+102+30+12+59+7) 1596 wp (120+139+317+346+215+67+306+86)
[...]
[PASS]
------------------------------------
running ./uffd-stress hugetlb 128 32
------------------------------------
nr_pages: 64, nr_pages_per_cpu: 8
bounces: 31, mode: rnd racing ver poll, userfaults: 29 missing (6+6+6+5+4+2+0+0) 104 wp (20+19+22+18+7+12+5+1)
[...]
[PASS]
--------------------------------------------
running ./uffd-stress hugetlb-private 128 32
--------------------------------------------
nr_pages: 64, nr_pages_per_cpu: 8
bounces: 31, mode: rnd racing ver poll, userfaults: 33 missing (12+9+7+0+5+0+0+0) 111 wp (24+25+14+14+11+17+5+1)
[...]
[PASS]
---------------------------------
running ./uffd-stress shmem 20 16
---------------------------------
nr_pages: 5120, nr_pages_per_cpu: 640
bounces: 15, mode: rnd racing ver poll, userfaults: 247 missing (15+17+34+60+81+37+3+0) 2038 wp (180+114+276+400+381+318+165+204)
[...]
[PASS]
-----------------------------------------
running ./uffd-stress shmem-private 20 16
-----------------------------------------
nr_pages: 5120, nr_pages_per_cpu: 640
bounces: 15, mode: rnd racing ver poll, userfaults: 235 missing (52+29+55+56+13+9+16+5) 2849 wp (218+406+461+531+328+284+430+191)
[...]
[PASS]
SUMMARY: PASS=6 SKIP=0 FAIL=0
===8<===

The output may be different if we miss some features (e.g., hugetlb not
allocated, old kernel, less privilege of uffd handle), but they should show
up with good reasons. E.g., I tried to run the unit test on my Fedora
kernel and it gives me:

===8<===
UFFDIO_API (with syscall)... failed [reason: UFFDIO_API should fail with wrong api but didn't]
UFFDIO_API (with /dev/userfaultfd)... skipped [reason: cannot open userfaultfd handle]
zeropage on anon... done
zeropage on shmem... done
zeropage on shmem-private... done
zeropage-hugetlb on hugetlb... done
zeropage-hugetlb on hugetlb-private... done
pagemap on anon... pagemap on anon... pagemap on anon... done
wp-unpopulated on anon... skipped [reason: feature missing]
minor on shmem... done
minor on hugetlb... done
minor-wp on shmem... skipped [reason: feature missing]
minor-wp on hugetlb... skipped [reason: feature missing]
minor-collapse on shmem... done
sigbus on anon... skipped [reason: possible lack of priviledge]
sigbus on shmem... skipped [reason: possible lack of priviledge]
sigbus on shmem-private... skipped [reason: possible lack of priviledge]
sigbus on hugetlb... skipped [reason: possible lack of priviledge]
sigbus on hugetlb-private... skipped [reason: possible lack of priviledge]
sigbus-wp on anon... skipped [reason: possible lack of priviledge]
sigbus-wp on shmem... skipped [reason: possible lack of priviledge]
sigbus-wp on shmem-private... skipped [reason: possible lack of priviledge]
sigbus-wp on hugetlb... skipped [reason: possible lack of priviledge]
sigbus-wp on hugetlb-private... skipped [reason: possible lack of priviledge]
events on anon... skipped [reason: possible lack of priviledge]
events on shmem... skipped [reason: possible lack of priviledge]
events on shmem-private... skipped [reason: possible lack of priviledge]
events on hugetlb... skipped [reason: possible lack of priviledge]
events on hugetlb-private... skipped [reason: possible lack of priviledge]
events-wp on anon... skipped [reason: possible lack of priviledge]
events-wp on shmem... skipped [reason: possible lack of priviledge]
events-wp on shmem-private... skipped [reason: possible lack of priviledge]
events-wp on hugetlb... skipped [reason: possible lack of priviledge]
events-wp on hugetlb-private... skipped [reason: possible lack of priviledge]
Userfaults unit tests: pass=9, skip=24, fail=1 (total=34)
===8<===

Patch layout:

- Revert "userfaultfd: don't fail on unrecognized features"

Something I found when I got the UFFDIO_API test below. Axel, I still
propose to revert it as a whole, but feel free to continue the discussion
from the original patch thread.

- selftests/mm: Update .gitignore with two missing tests
- selftests/mm: Dump a summary in run_vmtests.sh
- selftests/mm: Merge util.h into vm_util.h
- selftests/mm: Use TEST_GEN_PROGS where proper
- selftests/mm: Link vm_util.c always
- selftests/mm: Merge default_huge_page_size() into one
- selftests/mm: Use PM_* macros in vm_utils.h
- selftests/mm: Reuse pagemap_get_entry() in vm_util.h
- selftests/mm: Test UFFDIO_ZEROPAGE only when !hugetlb
- selftests/mm: Drop test_uffdio_zeropage_eexist

Until here, all cleanups here and there. I wanted to keep going, but I
found that maybe it'll take a few more days to split the test. Hence I
did a split starting from the next one, so we have a working thing first.

- selftests/mm: Create uffd-common.[ch]
- selftests/mm: Split uffd tests into uffd-stress and uffd-unit-tests

This did the major brute force split of common codes into
uffd-common.[ch]. That'll be the so far common base for stress and unit
tests. Then a new unit test is created.

- selftests/mm: uffd_[un]register()
- selftests/mm: uffd_open_{dev|sys}()
- selftests/mm: UFFDIO_API test

This patch hides here to start writting the 1st unit test with
UFFDIO_API, also detection of userfaultfd privileges.

- selftests/mm: Drop global mem_fd in uffd tests
- selftests/mm: Drop global hpage_size in uffd tests
- selftests/mm: Rename uffd_stats to uffd_args
- selftests/mm: Let uffd_handle_page_fault() takes wp parameter
- selftests/mm: Allow allocate_area() to fail properly

Some further cleanup that I noticed otherwise hard to move the tests.

- selftests/mm: Add framework for uffd-unit-test

The major patch provides the framework for most of the rest unit tests.

- selftests/mm: Move uffd pagemap test to unit test
- selftests/mm: Move uffd minor test to unit test
- selftests/mm: Move uffd sig/events tests into uffd unit tests
- selftests/mm: Move zeropage test into uffd unit tests

Move unit tests and suite them into the new file.

- selftests/mm: Workaround no way to detect uffd-minor + wp
- selftests/mm: Allow uffd test to skip properly with no privilege
- selftests/mm: Drop sys/dev test in uffd-stress test
- selftests/mm: Add shmem-private test to uffd-stress

A bunch of changes to do better on error reportings, and add
shmem-private to the stress test which was long missing.

- selftests/mm: Add uffdio register ioctls test

One more patch to test uffdio_register.ioctls.


This patch (of 30):

Update .gitignore with two missing tests.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230412163922.327282-1-peterx@redhat.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230412164114.327709-1-peterx@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org>
Cc: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>
Cc: Dmitry Safonov <0x7f454c46@gmail.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Zach O'Keefe <zokeefe@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>

show more ...

selftests/vm: rename selftests/vm to selftests/mm

Rename selftets/vm to selftests/mm for being more consistent with the
code, documentation, and tools directories, and won't be confused with
virtual

selftests/vm: rename selftests/vm to selftests/mm

Rename selftets/vm to selftests/mm for being more consistent with the
code, documentation, and tools directories, and won't be confused with
virtual machines.

[sj@kernel.org: convert missing vm->mm changes]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230107230643.252273-1-sj@kernel.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230103180754.129637-5-sj@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>

show more ...