|
Revision tags: v6.6.25, v6.6.24, v6.6.23, v6.6.16, v6.6.15, v6.6.14, v6.6.13, v6.6.12, v6.6.11, v6.6.10, v6.6.9, v6.6.8, v6.6.7, v6.6.6, v6.6.5, v6.6.4, v6.6.3, v6.6.2, v6.5.11, v6.6.1, v6.5.10, v6.6, v6.5.9, v6.5.8, v6.5.7, v6.5.6, v6.5.5, v6.5.4, v6.5.3, v6.5.2, v6.1.51, v6.5.1, v6.1.50, v6.5, v6.1.49, v6.1.48, v6.1.46, v6.1.45, v6.1.44, v6.1.43, v6.1.42, v6.1.41, v6.1.40, v6.1.39, v6.1.38, v6.1.37, v6.1.36, v6.4, v6.1.35, v6.1.34, v6.1.33, v6.1.32 |
|
| #
204cc3d0 |
| 02-Jun-2023 |
Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com> |
selftests: mlxsw: ingress_rif_conf_1d: Fix the diagram
The topology diagram implies that $swp1 and $swp2 are members of the bridge
br0, when in fact only their uppers, $swp1.10 and $swp2.10 are. Adj
selftests: mlxsw: ingress_rif_conf_1d: Fix the diagram
The topology diagram implies that $swp1 and $swp2 are members of the bridge
br0, when in fact only their uppers, $swp1.10 and $swp2.10 are. Adjust the
diagram.
Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Amit Cohen <amcohen@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: v6.1.31, v6.1.30, v6.1.29, v6.1.28, v6.1.27, v6.1.26, v6.3, v6.1.25, v6.1.24, v6.1.23, v6.1.22, v6.1.21, v6.1.20, v6.1.19, v6.1.18, v6.1.17, v6.1.16, v6.1.15, v6.1.14, v6.1.13, v6.2, v6.1.12, v6.1.11, v6.1.10, v6.1.9, v6.1.8, v6.1.7, v6.1.6, v6.1.5, v6.0.19, v6.0.18, v6.1.4, v6.1.3, v6.0.17, v6.1.2, v6.0.16, v6.1.1, v6.0.15, v6.0.14, v6.0.13, v6.1, v6.0.12, v6.0.11, v6.0.10, v5.15.80, v6.0.9, v5.15.79, v6.0.8, v5.15.78, v6.0.7, v5.15.77, v5.15.76, v6.0.6, v6.0.5, v5.15.75, v6.0.4, v6.0.3, v6.0.2, v5.15.74, v5.15.73, v6.0.1, v5.15.72, v6.0, v5.15.71, v5.15.70, v5.15.69, v5.15.68, v5.15.67, v5.15.66, v5.15.65, v5.15.64, v5.15.63, v5.15.62 |
|
| #
2cd87cea |
| 17-Aug-2022 |
Amit Cohen <amcohen@nvidia.com> |
selftests: mlxsw: Add ingress RIF configuration test for 802.1D bridge
Before layer 2 forwarding, the device classifies an incoming packet to a
FID. After classification, the FID is known, but also
selftests: mlxsw: Add ingress RIF configuration test for 802.1D bridge
Before layer 2 forwarding, the device classifies an incoming packet to a
FID. After classification, the FID is known, but also all the attributes of
the FID, such as the router interface (RIF) via which a packet that needs
to be routed will ingress the router block.
For VLAN-unaware bridges (802.1D), the FID classification is done according
to {Port, VID}. When a RIF is added on top of a FID, all the existing
{Port, VID}->FID mappings should be updated by the software with the new
RIF. In addition, when a new mapping is added for FID which already has a
RIF, the correct RIF should be used for it.
Add a test to verify that packets can be routed after {Port, VID}->FID
classification, regardless of the order of the configuration.
# ./ingress_rif_conf_1d.sh
TEST: Add RIF for existing {port, VID}->FID mapping [ OK ]
TEST: Add {port, VID}->FID mapping for FID with a RIF [ OK ]
Signed-off-by: Amit Cohen <amcohen@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
show more ...
|