Revision tags: v6.6.25, v6.6.24, v6.6.23, v6.6.16, v6.6.15, v6.6.14, v6.6.13, v6.6.12, v6.6.11, v6.6.10, v6.6.9, v6.6.8, v6.6.7, v6.6.6, v6.6.5, v6.6.4, v6.6.3, v6.6.2, v6.5.11, v6.6.1, v6.5.10, v6.6, v6.5.9, v6.5.8, v6.5.7, v6.5.6, v6.5.5, v6.5.4, v6.5.3, v6.5.2, v6.1.51, v6.5.1, v6.1.50, v6.5, v6.1.49, v6.1.48, v6.1.46, v6.1.45, v6.1.44, v6.1.43, v6.1.42, v6.1.41, v6.1.40, v6.1.39, v6.1.38 |
|
#
ce1f289f |
| 05-Jul-2023 |
Björn Töpel <bjorn@rivosinc.com> |
selftests/bpf: Add F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS to some tests
Some verifier tests were missing F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, which made the test fail. Add the flag where needed.
Signed-
selftests/bpf: Add F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS to some tests
Some verifier tests were missing F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, which made the test fail. Add the flag where needed.
Signed-off-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@rivosinc.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230705113926.751791-2-bjorn@kernel.org
show more ...
|
Revision tags: v6.1.37, v6.1.36, v6.4, v6.1.35, v6.1.34, v6.1.33, v6.1.32, v6.1.31, v6.1.30, v6.1.29, v6.1.28, v6.1.27, v6.1.26, v6.3, v6.1.25 |
|
#
09b501d9 |
| 16-Apr-2023 |
David Vernet <void@manifault.com> |
bpf: Remove bpf_kfunc_call_test_kptr_get() test kfunc
We've managed to improve the UX for kptrs significantly over the last 9 months. All of the prior main use cases, struct bpf_cpumask *, struct ta
bpf: Remove bpf_kfunc_call_test_kptr_get() test kfunc
We've managed to improve the UX for kptrs significantly over the last 9 months. All of the prior main use cases, struct bpf_cpumask *, struct task_struct *, and struct cgroup *, have all been updated to be synchronized mainly using RCU. In other words, their KF_ACQUIRE kfunc calls are all KF_RCU, and the pointers themselves are MEM_RCU and can be accessed in an RCU read region in BPF.
In a follow-on change, we'll be removing the KF_KPTR_GET kfunc flag. This patch prepares for that by removing the bpf_kfunc_call_test_kptr_get() kfunc, and all associated selftests.
Signed-off-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230416084928.326135-2-void@manifault.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
show more ...
|
Revision tags: v6.1.24, v6.1.23, v6.1.22, v6.1.21, v6.1.20, v6.1.19, v6.1.18, v6.1.17, v6.1.16, v6.1.15 |
|
#
20c09d92 |
| 02-Mar-2023 |
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> |
bpf: Introduce kptr_rcu.
The life time of certain kernel structures like 'struct cgroup' is protected by RCU. Hence it's safe to dereference them directly from __kptr tagged pointers in bpf maps. Th
bpf: Introduce kptr_rcu.
The life time of certain kernel structures like 'struct cgroup' is protected by RCU. Hence it's safe to dereference them directly from __kptr tagged pointers in bpf maps. The resulting pointer is MEM_RCU and can be passed to kfuncs that expect KF_RCU. Derefrence of other kptr-s returns PTR_UNTRUSTED.
For example: struct map_value { struct cgroup __kptr *cgrp; };
SEC("tp_btf/cgroup_mkdir") int BPF_PROG(test_cgrp_get_ancestors, struct cgroup *cgrp_arg, const char *path) { struct cgroup *cg, *cg2;
cg = bpf_cgroup_acquire(cgrp_arg); // cg is PTR_TRUSTED and ref_obj_id > 0 bpf_kptr_xchg(&v->cgrp, cg);
cg2 = v->cgrp; // This is new feature introduced by this patch. // cg2 is PTR_MAYBE_NULL | MEM_RCU. // When cg2 != NULL, it's a valid cgroup, but its percpu_ref could be zero
if (cg2) bpf_cgroup_ancestor(cg2, level); // safe to do. }
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Acked-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230303041446.3630-4-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
show more ...
|
Revision tags: v6.1.14, v6.1.13, v6.2, v6.1.12, v6.1.11, v6.1.10, v6.1.9, v6.1.8, v6.1.7, v6.1.6, v6.1.5, v6.0.19, v6.0.18, v6.1.4, v6.1.3, v6.0.17, v6.1.2, v6.0.16, v6.1.1, v6.0.15, v6.0.14, v6.0.13, v6.1, v6.0.12, v6.0.11, v6.0.10, v5.15.80, v6.0.9, v5.15.79, v6.0.8, v5.15.78, v6.0.7, v5.15.77, v5.15.76, v6.0.6, v6.0.5, v5.15.75, v6.0.4, v6.0.3, v6.0.2, v5.15.74, v5.15.73, v6.0.1, v5.15.72, v6.0, v5.15.71, v5.15.70, v5.15.69, v5.15.68, v5.15.67, v5.15.66, v5.15.65, v5.15.64, v5.15.63, v5.15.62, v5.15.61, v5.15.60, v5.15.59, v5.19, v5.15.58, v5.15.57, v5.15.56, v5.15.55, v5.15.54, v5.15.53, v5.15.52, v5.15.51, v5.15.50, v5.15.49, v5.15.48, v5.15.47, v5.15.46, v5.15.45, v5.15.44, v5.15.43, v5.15.42, v5.18, v5.15.41, v5.15.40, v5.15.39 |
|
#
5cdccadc |
| 11-May-2022 |
Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> |
bpf: Prepare prog_test_struct kfuncs for runtime tests
In an effort to actually test the refcounting logic at runtime, add a refcount_t member to prog_test_ref_kfunc and use it in selftests to verif
bpf: Prepare prog_test_struct kfuncs for runtime tests
In an effort to actually test the refcounting logic at runtime, add a refcount_t member to prog_test_ref_kfunc and use it in selftests to verify and test the whole logic more exhaustively.
The kfunc calls for prog_test_member do not require runtime refcounting, as they are only used for verifier selftests, not during runtime execution. Hence, their implementation now has a WARN_ON_ONCE as it is not meant to be reachable code at runtime. It is strictly used in tests triggering failure cases in the verifier. bpf_kfunc_call_memb_release is called from map free path, since prog_test_member is embedded in map value for some verifier tests, so we skip WARN_ON_ONCE for it.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220511194654.765705-3-memxor@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
show more ...
|
Revision tags: v5.15.38, v5.15.37, v5.15.36 |
|
#
05a945de |
| 24-Apr-2022 |
Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> |
selftests/bpf: Add verifier tests for kptr
Reuse bpf_prog_test functions to test the support for PTR_TO_BTF_ID in BPF map case, including some tests that verify implementation sanity and corner case
selftests/bpf: Add verifier tests for kptr
Reuse bpf_prog_test functions to test the support for PTR_TO_BTF_ID in BPF map case, including some tests that verify implementation sanity and corner cases.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220424214901.2743946-13-memxor@gmail.com
show more ...
|