|
Revision tags: v6.6.25, v6.6.24, v6.6.23, v6.6.16, v6.6.15, v6.6.14, v6.6.13, v6.6.12, v6.6.11, v6.6.10, v6.6.9, v6.6.8, v6.6.7, v6.6.6, v6.6.5, v6.6.4, v6.6.3, v6.6.2, v6.5.11, v6.6.1, v6.5.10, v6.6, v6.5.9, v6.5.8, v6.5.7, v6.5.6, v6.5.5, v6.5.4, v6.5.3, v6.5.2, v6.1.51, v6.5.1, v6.1.50, v6.5, v6.1.49, v6.1.48, v6.1.46, v6.1.45, v6.1.44, v6.1.43, v6.1.42, v6.1.41, v6.1.40, v6.1.39, v6.1.38, v6.1.37, v6.1.36, v6.4, v6.1.35, v6.1.34, v6.1.33, v6.1.32, v6.1.31, v6.1.30, v6.1.29, v6.1.28, v6.1.27, v6.1.26, v6.3, v6.1.25, v6.1.24, v6.1.23, v6.1.22, v6.1.21, v6.1.20, v6.1.19, v6.1.18, v6.1.17, v6.1.16, v6.1.15, v6.1.14, v6.1.13, v6.2, v6.1.12, v6.1.11, v6.1.10, v6.1.9, v6.1.8, v6.1.7, v6.1.6, v6.1.5, v6.0.19, v6.0.18, v6.1.4, v6.1.3, v6.0.17, v6.1.2, v6.0.16, v6.1.1, v6.0.15, v6.0.14, v6.0.13, v6.1, v6.0.12, v6.0.11, v6.0.10, v5.15.80, v6.0.9, v5.15.79, v6.0.8, v5.15.78, v6.0.7, v5.15.77, v5.15.76, v6.0.6, v6.0.5, v5.15.75, v6.0.4, v6.0.3, v6.0.2, v5.15.74, v5.15.73, v6.0.1, v5.15.72, v6.0, v5.15.71, v5.15.70, v5.15.69, v5.15.68, v5.15.67, v5.15.66, v5.15.65, v5.15.64, v5.15.63, v5.15.62, v5.15.61, v5.15.60, v5.15.59, v5.19, v5.15.58, v5.15.57, v5.15.56, v5.15.55, v5.15.54, v5.15.53, v5.15.52, v5.15.51, v5.15.50, v5.15.49, v5.15.48, v5.15.47, v5.15.46, v5.15.45, v5.15.44, v5.15.43, v5.15.42, v5.18, v5.15.41, v5.15.40, v5.15.39, v5.15.38, v5.15.37, v5.15.36, v5.15.35, v5.15.34, v5.15.33, v5.15.32, v5.15.31, v5.17, v5.15.30, v5.15.29, v5.15.28, v5.15.27, v5.15.26, v5.15.25, v5.15.24, v5.15.23, v5.15.22, v5.15.21, v5.15.20, v5.15.19, v5.15.18, v5.15.17, v5.4.173, v5.15.16, v5.15.15, v5.16, v5.15.10, v5.15.9, v5.15.8, v5.15.7, v5.15.6, v5.15.5, v5.15.4, v5.15.3, v5.15.2, v5.15.1, v5.15, v5.14.14, v5.14.13, v5.14.12, v5.14.11 |
|
| #
dd65acf7 |
| 07-Oct-2021 |
Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com> |
selftests/bpf: Remove SEC("version") from test progs
Since commit 6c4fc209fcf9d ("bpf: remove useless version check for prog
load") these "version" sections, which result in bpf_attr.kern_version
be
selftests/bpf: Remove SEC("version") from test progs
Since commit 6c4fc209fcf9d ("bpf: remove useless version check for prog
load") these "version" sections, which result in bpf_attr.kern_version
being set, have been unnecessary.
Remove them so that it's obvious to folks using selftests as a guide that
"modern" BPF progs don't need this section.
Signed-off-by: Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211007231234.2223081-1-davemarchevsky@fb.com
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: v5.14.10, v5.14.9, v5.14.8, v5.14.7, v5.14.6, v5.10.67, v5.10.66, v5.14.5, v5.14.4, v5.10.65, v5.14.3, v5.10.64, v5.14.2, v5.10.63, v5.14.1, v5.10.62, v5.14, v5.10.61, v5.10.60, v5.10.53, v5.10.52, v5.10.51, v5.10.50, v5.10.49, v5.13, v5.10.46, v5.10.43, v5.10.42, v5.10.41, v5.10.40, v5.10.39, v5.4.119, v5.10.36, v5.10.35, v5.10.34, v5.4.116, v5.10.33, v5.12, v5.10.32, v5.10.31, v5.10.30 |
|
| #
007bdc12 |
| 01-Apr-2021 |
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com> |
bpf, selftests: test_maps generating unrecognized data section
With a relatively recent clang master branch test_map skips a section,
libbpf: elf: skipping unrecognized data section(5) .rodata.str
bpf, selftests: test_maps generating unrecognized data section
With a relatively recent clang master branch test_map skips a section,
libbpf: elf: skipping unrecognized data section(5) .rodata.str1.1
the cause is some pointless strings from bpf_printks in the BPF program
loaded during testing. After just removing the prints to fix above error
Daniel points out the program is a bit pointless and could be simply the
empty program returning SK_PASS.
Here we do just that and return simply SK_PASS. This program is used with
test_maps selftests to test insert/remove of a program into the sockmap
and sockhash maps. Its not testing actual functionality of the TCP
sockmap programs, these are tested from test_sockmap. So we shouldn't
lose in test coverage and fix above warnings. This original test was
added before test_sockmap existed and has been copied around ever since,
clean it up now.
Signed-off-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/161731595664.74613.1603087410166945302.stgit@john-XPS-13-9370
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: v5.10.27, v5.10.26, v5.10.25, v5.10.24, v5.10.23, v5.10.22, v5.10.21, v5.10.20, v5.10.19, v5.4.101, v5.10.18, v5.10.17, v5.11, v5.10.16, v5.10.15, v5.10.14, v5.10, v5.8.17, v5.8.16, v5.8.15, v5.9, v5.8.14, v5.8.13, v5.8.12, v5.8.11, v5.8.10, v5.8.9, v5.8.8, v5.8.7, v5.8.6, v5.4.62, v5.8.5, v5.8.4, v5.4.61, v5.8.3, v5.4.60, v5.8.2, v5.4.59, v5.8.1, v5.4.58, v5.4.57, v5.4.56, v5.8, v5.7.12, v5.4.55, v5.7.11, v5.4.54, v5.7.10, v5.4.53, v5.4.52, v5.7.9, v5.7.8, v5.4.51, v5.4.50, v5.7.7, v5.4.49, v5.7.6, v5.7.5, v5.4.48, v5.7.4, v5.7.3, v5.4.47, v5.4.46, v5.7.2, v5.4.45, v5.7.1, v5.4.44, v5.7, v5.4.43, v5.4.42, v5.4.41, v5.4.40, v5.4.39, v5.4.38, v5.4.37, v5.4.36, v5.4.35, v5.4.34, v5.4.33, v5.4.32, v5.4.31, v5.4.30, v5.4.29, v5.6, v5.4.28, v5.4.27, v5.4.26, v5.4.25, v5.4.24, v5.4.23, v5.4.22, v5.4.21, v5.4.20, v5.4.19, v5.4.18, v5.4.17, v5.4.16, v5.5, v5.4.15, v5.4.14 |
|
| #
3e689141 |
| 20-Jan-2020 |
Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com> |
selftests: Use consistent include paths for libbpf
Fix all selftests to include libbpf header files with the bpf/ prefix, to
be consistent with external users of the library. Also ensure that all
in
selftests: Use consistent include paths for libbpf
Fix all selftests to include libbpf header files with the bpf/ prefix, to
be consistent with external users of the library. Also ensure that all
includes of exported libbpf header files (those that are exported on 'make
install' of the library) use bracketed includes instead of quoted.
To not break the build, keep the old include path until everything has been
changed to the new one; a subsequent patch will remove that.
Fixes: 6910d7d3867a ("selftests/bpf: Ensure bpf_helper_defs.h are taken from selftests dir")
Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/157952560568.1683545.9649335788846513446.stgit@toke.dk
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: v5.4.13, v5.4.12, v5.4.11, v5.4.10, v5.4.9, v5.4.8, v5.4.7, v5.4.6, v5.4.5, v5.4.4, v5.4.3, v5.3.15, v5.4.2, v5.4.1, v5.3.14, v5.4, v5.3.13, v5.3.12, v5.3.11, v5.3.10, v5.3.9, v5.3.8, v5.3.7, v5.3.6, v5.3.5, v5.3.4, v5.3.3, v5.3.2, v5.3.1, v5.3, v5.2.14, v5.3-rc8, v5.2.13, v5.2.12, v5.2.11, v5.2.10, v5.2.9, v5.2.8, v5.2.7, v5.2.6, v5.2.5, v5.2.4, v5.2.3, v5.2.2, v5.2.1, v5.2, v5.1.16, v5.1.15, v5.1.14, v5.1.13, v5.1.12, v5.1.11, v5.1.10, v5.1.9 |
|
| #
ebb88607 |
| 10-Jun-2019 |
Hechao Li <hechaol@fb.com> |
selftests/bpf: remove bpf_util.h from BPF C progs
Though currently there is no problem including bpf_util.h in kernel
space BPF C programs, in next patch in this stack, I will reuse
libbpf_num_possi
selftests/bpf: remove bpf_util.h from BPF C progs
Though currently there is no problem including bpf_util.h in kernel
space BPF C programs, in next patch in this stack, I will reuse
libbpf_num_possible_cpus() in bpf_util.h thus include libbpf.h in it,
which will cause BPF C programs compile error. Therefore I will first
remove bpf_util.h from all test BPF programs.
This can also make it clear that bpf_util.h is a user-space utility
while bpf_helpers.h is a kernel space utility.
Signed-off-by: Hechao Li <hechaol@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: v5.1.8, v5.1.7, v5.1.6, v5.1.5 |
|
| #
37739d1b |
| 23-May-2019 |
Michal Rostecki <mrostecki@opensuse.org> |
selftests: bpf: Move bpf_printk to bpf_helpers.h
bpf_printk is a macro which is commonly used to print out debug messages
in BPF programs and it was copied in many selftests and samples. Since
all o
selftests: bpf: Move bpf_printk to bpf_helpers.h
bpf_printk is a macro which is commonly used to print out debug messages
in BPF programs and it was copied in many selftests and samples. Since
all of them include bpf_helpers.h, this change moves the macro there.
Signed-off-by: Michal Rostecki <mrostecki@opensuse.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: v5.1.4, v5.1.3, v5.1.2, v5.1.1, v5.0.14, v5.1, v5.0.13, v5.0.12, v5.0.11, v5.0.10, v5.0.9, v5.0.8, v5.0.7, v5.0.6, v5.0.5, v5.0.4, v5.0.3, v4.19.29, v5.0.2, v4.19.28, v5.0.1, v4.19.27, v5.0, v4.19.26, v4.19.25, v4.19.24, v4.19.23, v4.19.22, v4.19.21 |
|
| #
bd4aed0e |
| 11-Feb-2019 |
Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@netronome.com> |
selftests: bpf: centre kernel bpf objects under new subdir "progs"
At the moment, all kernel bpf objects are listed under BPF_OBJ_FILES.
Listing them manually sometimes causing patch conflict when p
selftests: bpf: centre kernel bpf objects under new subdir "progs"
At the moment, all kernel bpf objects are listed under BPF_OBJ_FILES.
Listing them manually sometimes causing patch conflict when people are
adding new testcases simultaneously.
It is better to centre all the related source files under a subdir
"progs", then auto-generate the object file list.
Suggested-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: v5.10.27, v5.10.26, v5.10.25, v5.10.24, v5.10.23, v5.10.22, v5.10.21, v5.10.20, v5.10.19, v5.4.101, v5.10.18, v5.10.17, v5.11, v5.10.16, v5.10.15, v5.10.14, v5.10, v5.8.17, v5.8.16, v5.8.15, v5.9, v5.8.14, v5.8.13, v5.8.12, v5.8.11, v5.8.10, v5.8.9, v5.8.8, v5.8.7, v5.8.6, v5.4.62, v5.8.5, v5.8.4, v5.4.61, v5.8.3, v5.4.60, v5.8.2, v5.4.59, v5.8.1, v5.4.58, v5.4.57, v5.4.56, v5.8, v5.7.12, v5.4.55, v5.7.11, v5.4.54, v5.7.10, v5.4.53, v5.4.52, v5.7.9, v5.7.8, v5.4.51, v5.4.50, v5.7.7, v5.4.49, v5.7.6, v5.7.5, v5.4.48, v5.7.4, v5.7.3, v5.4.47, v5.4.46, v5.7.2, v5.4.45, v5.7.1, v5.4.44, v5.7, v5.4.43, v5.4.42, v5.4.41, v5.4.40, v5.4.39, v5.4.38, v5.4.37, v5.4.36, v5.4.35, v5.4.34, v5.4.33, v5.4.32, v5.4.31, v5.4.30, v5.4.29, v5.6, v5.4.28, v5.4.27, v5.4.26, v5.4.25, v5.4.24, v5.4.23, v5.4.22, v5.4.21, v5.4.20, v5.4.19, v5.4.18, v5.4.17, v5.4.16, v5.5, v5.4.15, v5.4.14 |
|
| #
3e689141 |
| 20-Jan-2020 |
Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com> |
selftests: Use consistent include paths for libbpf
Fix all selftests to include libbpf header files with the bpf/ prefix, to
be consistent with external users of the library. Also ensure
selftests: Use consistent include paths for libbpf
Fix all selftests to include libbpf header files with the bpf/ prefix, to
be consistent with external users of the library. Also ensure that all
includes of exported libbpf header files (those that are exported on 'make
install' of the library) use bracketed includes instead of quoted.
To not break the build, keep the old include path until everything has been
changed to the new one; a subsequent patch will remove that.
Fixes: 6910d7d3867a ("selftests/bpf: Ensure bpf_helper_defs.h are taken from selftests dir")
Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/157952560568.1683545.9649335788846513446.stgit@toke.dk
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: v5.4.13, v5.4.12, v5.4.11, v5.4.10, v5.4.9, v5.4.8, v5.4.7, v5.4.6, v5.4.5, v5.4.4, v5.4.3, v5.3.15, v5.4.2, v5.4.1, v5.3.14, v5.4, v5.3.13, v5.3.12, v5.3.11, v5.3.10, v5.3.9, v5.3.8, v5.3.7, v5.3.6, v5.3.5, v5.3.4, v5.3.3, v5.3.2, v5.3.1, v5.3, v5.2.14, v5.3-rc8, v5.2.13, v5.2.12, v5.2.11, v5.2.10, v5.2.9, v5.2.8, v5.2.7, v5.2.6, v5.2.5, v5.2.4, v5.2.3, v5.2.2, v5.2.1, v5.2, v5.1.16, v5.1.15, v5.1.14, v5.1.13, v5.1.12, v5.1.11, v5.1.10, v5.1.9 |
|
| #
ebb88607 |
| 10-Jun-2019 |
Hechao Li <hechaol@fb.com> |
selftests/bpf: remove bpf_util.h from BPF C progs
Though currently there is no problem including bpf_util.h in kernel
space BPF C programs, in next patch in this stack, I will reuse
selftests/bpf: remove bpf_util.h from BPF C progs
Though currently there is no problem including bpf_util.h in kernel
space BPF C programs, in next patch in this stack, I will reuse
libbpf_num_possible_cpus() in bpf_util.h thus include libbpf.h in it,
which will cause BPF C programs compile error. Therefore I will first
remove bpf_util.h from all test BPF programs.
This can also make it clear that bpf_util.h is a user-space utility
while bpf_helpers.h is a kernel space utility.
Signed-off-by: Hechao Li <hechaol@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: v5.1.8, v5.1.7, v5.1.6, v5.1.5 |
|
| #
37739d1b |
| 23-May-2019 |
Michal Rostecki <mrostecki@opensuse.org> |
selftests: bpf: Move bpf_printk to bpf_helpers.h
bpf_printk is a macro which is commonly used to print out debug messages
in BPF programs and it was copied in many selftests and samples.
selftests: bpf: Move bpf_printk to bpf_helpers.h
bpf_printk is a macro which is commonly used to print out debug messages
in BPF programs and it was copied in many selftests and samples. Since
all of them include bpf_helpers.h, this change moves the macro there.
Signed-off-by: Michal Rostecki <mrostecki@opensuse.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: v5.1.4, v5.1.3, v5.1.2, v5.1.1, v5.0.14, v5.1, v5.0.13, v5.0.12, v5.0.11, v5.0.10, v5.0.9, v5.0.8, v5.0.7, v5.0.6, v5.0.5, v5.0.4, v5.0.3, v4.19.29, v5.0.2, v4.19.28, v5.0.1, v4.19.27, v5.0, v4.19.26, v4.19.25, v4.19.24, v4.19.23, v4.19.22, v4.19.21 |
|
| #
bd4aed0e |
| 11-Feb-2019 |
Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@netronome.com> |
selftests: bpf: centre kernel bpf objects under new subdir "progs"
At the moment, all kernel bpf objects are listed under BPF_OBJ_FILES.
Listing them manually sometimes causing patch con
selftests: bpf: centre kernel bpf objects under new subdir "progs"
At the moment, all kernel bpf objects are listed under BPF_OBJ_FILES.
Listing them manually sometimes causing patch conflict when people are
adding new testcases simultaneously.
It is better to centre all the related source files under a subdir
"progs", then auto-generate the object file list.
Suggested-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
show more ...
|