Revision tags: v6.6.25, v6.6.24, v6.6.23, v6.6.16, v6.6.15, v6.6.14, v6.6.13, v6.6.12, v6.6.11, v6.6.10, v6.6.9, v6.6.8, v6.6.7, v6.6.6, v6.6.5, v6.6.4, v6.6.3, v6.6.2, v6.5.11, v6.6.1, v6.5.10, v6.6, v6.5.9, v6.5.8, v6.5.7, v6.5.6, v6.5.5, v6.5.4, v6.5.3, v6.5.2, v6.1.51, v6.5.1, v6.1.50, v6.5, v6.1.49, v6.1.48, v6.1.46, v6.1.45, v6.1.44, v6.1.43, v6.1.42, v6.1.41, v6.1.40, v6.1.39 |
|
#
d2284d68 |
| 12-Jul-2023 |
Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com> |
selftests/bpf: Add selftests for nested_trust
Add selftests for nested_strust to check whehter PTR_UNTRUSTED is cleared as expected, the result as follows:
#141/1 nested_trust/test_read_cpumask:
selftests/bpf: Add selftests for nested_trust
Add selftests for nested_strust to check whehter PTR_UNTRUSTED is cleared as expected, the result as follows:
#141/1 nested_trust/test_read_cpumask:OK #141/2 nested_trust/test_skb_field:OK <<<< #141/3 nested_trust/test_invalid_nested_user_cpus:OK #141/4 nested_trust/test_invalid_nested_offset:OK #141/5 nested_trust/test_invalid_skb_field:OK <<<< #141 nested_trust:OK
The #141/2 and #141/5 are newly added.
Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230713025642.27477-3-laoar.shao@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
show more ...
|
Revision tags: v6.1.38, v6.1.37, v6.1.36, v6.4, v6.1.35, v6.1.34, v6.1.33, v6.1.32, v6.1.31, v6.1.30, v6.1.29, v6.1.28, v6.1.27, v6.1.26, v6.3, v6.1.25, v6.1.24, v6.1.23, v6.1.22, v6.1.21, v6.1.20, v6.1.19, v6.1.18, v6.1.17, v6.1.16, v6.1.15 |
|
#
6fcd486b |
| 02-Mar-2023 |
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> |
bpf: Refactor RCU enforcement in the verifier.
bpf_rcu_read_lock/unlock() are only available in clang compiled kernels. Lack of such key mechanism makes it impossible for sleepable bpf programs to u
bpf: Refactor RCU enforcement in the verifier.
bpf_rcu_read_lock/unlock() are only available in clang compiled kernels. Lack of such key mechanism makes it impossible for sleepable bpf programs to use RCU pointers.
Allow bpf_rcu_read_lock/unlock() in GCC compiled kernels (though GCC doesn't support btf_type_tag yet) and allowlist certain field dereferences in important data structures like tast_struct, cgroup, socket that are used by sleepable programs either as RCU pointer or full trusted pointer (which is valid outside of RCU CS). Use BTF_TYPE_SAFE_RCU and BTF_TYPE_SAFE_TRUSTED macros for such tagging. They will be removed once GCC supports btf_type_tag.
With that refactor check_ptr_to_btf_access(). Make it strict in enforcing PTR_TRUSTED and PTR_UNTRUSTED while deprecating old PTR_TO_BTF_ID without modifier flags. There is a chance that this strict enforcement might break existing programs (especially on GCC compiled kernels), but this cleanup has to start sooner than later. Note PTR_TO_CTX access still yields old deprecated PTR_TO_BTF_ID. Once it's converted to strict PTR_TRUSTED or PTR_UNTRUSTED the kfuncs and helpers will be able to default to KF_TRUSTED_ARGS. KF_RCU will remain as a weaker version of KF_TRUSTED_ARGS where obj refcnt could be 0.
Adjust rcu_read_lock selftest to run on gcc and clang compiled kernels.
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230303041446.3630-7-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
show more ...
|
Revision tags: v6.1.14, v6.1.13, v6.2, v6.1.12, v6.1.11, v6.1.10, v6.1.9 |
|
#
a6541f4d |
| 25-Jan-2023 |
David Vernet <void@manifault.com> |
selftests/bpf: Add nested trust selftests suite
Now that defining trusted fields in a struct is supported, we should add selftests to verify the behavior. This patch adds a few such testcases.
Sign
selftests/bpf: Add nested trust selftests suite
Now that defining trusted fields in a struct is supported, we should add selftests to verify the behavior. This patch adds a few such testcases.
Signed-off-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230125143816.721952-4-void@manifault.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
show more ...
|