|
Revision tags: v6.6.35, v6.6.34, v6.6.33, v6.6.32, v6.6.31, v6.6.30, v6.6.29 |
|
| #
39f8a293 |
| 26-Apr-2024 |
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> |
bpf: Fix verifier assumptions about socket->sk
[ Upstream commit 0db63c0b86e981a1e97d2596d64ceceba1a5470e ]
The verifier assumes that 'sk' field in 'struct socket' is valid
and non-NULL when 'socke
bpf: Fix verifier assumptions about socket->sk
[ Upstream commit 0db63c0b86e981a1e97d2596d64ceceba1a5470e ]
The verifier assumes that 'sk' field in 'struct socket' is valid
and non-NULL when 'socket' pointer itself is trusted and non-NULL.
That may not be the case when socket was just created and
passed to LSM socket_accept hook.
Fix this verifier assumption and adjust tests.
Reported-by: Liam Wisehart <liamwisehart@meta.com>
Acked-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Fixes: 6fcd486b3a0a ("bpf: Refactor RCU enforcement in the verifier.")
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240427002544.68803-1-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: v6.6.35, v6.6.34, v6.6.33, v6.6.32, v6.6.31, v6.6.30, v6.6.29 |
|
| #
39f8a293 |
| 26-Apr-2024 |
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> |
bpf: Fix verifier assumptions about socket->sk
[ Upstream commit 0db63c0b86e981a1e97d2596d64ceceba1a5470e ]
The verifier assumes that 'sk' field in 'struct socket' is valid
and non-NULL when 'socke
bpf: Fix verifier assumptions about socket->sk
[ Upstream commit 0db63c0b86e981a1e97d2596d64ceceba1a5470e ]
The verifier assumes that 'sk' field in 'struct socket' is valid
and non-NULL when 'socket' pointer itself is trusted and non-NULL.
That may not be the case when socket was just created and
passed to LSM socket_accept hook.
Fix this verifier assumption and adjust tests.
Reported-by: Liam Wisehart <liamwisehart@meta.com>
Acked-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Fixes: 6fcd486b3a0a ("bpf: Refactor RCU enforcement in the verifier.")
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240427002544.68803-1-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: v6.6.35, v6.6.34, v6.6.33, v6.6.32, v6.6.31, v6.6.30, v6.6.29 |
|
| #
39f8a293 |
| 26-Apr-2024 |
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> |
bpf: Fix verifier assumptions about socket->sk
[ Upstream commit 0db63c0b86e981a1e97d2596d64ceceba1a5470e ]
The verifier assumes that 'sk' field in 'struct socket' is valid
and non-NULL when 'socke
bpf: Fix verifier assumptions about socket->sk
[ Upstream commit 0db63c0b86e981a1e97d2596d64ceceba1a5470e ]
The verifier assumes that 'sk' field in 'struct socket' is valid
and non-NULL when 'socket' pointer itself is trusted and non-NULL.
That may not be the case when socket was just created and
passed to LSM socket_accept hook.
Fix this verifier assumption and adjust tests.
Reported-by: Liam Wisehart <liamwisehart@meta.com>
Acked-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Fixes: 6fcd486b3a0a ("bpf: Refactor RCU enforcement in the verifier.")
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240427002544.68803-1-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: v6.6.35, v6.6.34, v6.6.33, v6.6.32, v6.6.31, v6.6.30, v6.6.29 |
|
| #
39f8a293 |
| 26-Apr-2024 |
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> |
bpf: Fix verifier assumptions about socket->sk
[ Upstream commit 0db63c0b86e981a1e97d2596d64ceceba1a5470e ]
The verifier assumes that 'sk' field in 'struct socket' is valid
and non-NULL when 'socke
bpf: Fix verifier assumptions about socket->sk
[ Upstream commit 0db63c0b86e981a1e97d2596d64ceceba1a5470e ]
The verifier assumes that 'sk' field in 'struct socket' is valid
and non-NULL when 'socket' pointer itself is trusted and non-NULL.
That may not be the case when socket was just created and
passed to LSM socket_accept hook.
Fix this verifier assumption and adjust tests.
Reported-by: Liam Wisehart <liamwisehart@meta.com>
Acked-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Fixes: 6fcd486b3a0a ("bpf: Refactor RCU enforcement in the verifier.")
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240427002544.68803-1-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: v6.6.35, v6.6.34, v6.6.33, v6.6.32, v6.6.31, v6.6.30, v6.6.29 |
|
| #
39f8a293 |
| 26-Apr-2024 |
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> |
bpf: Fix verifier assumptions about socket->sk
[ Upstream commit 0db63c0b86e981a1e97d2596d64ceceba1a5470e ]
The verifier assumes that 'sk' field in 'struct socket' is valid
and non-NULL when 'socke
bpf: Fix verifier assumptions about socket->sk
[ Upstream commit 0db63c0b86e981a1e97d2596d64ceceba1a5470e ]
The verifier assumes that 'sk' field in 'struct socket' is valid
and non-NULL when 'socket' pointer itself is trusted and non-NULL.
That may not be the case when socket was just created and
passed to LSM socket_accept hook.
Fix this verifier assumption and adjust tests.
Reported-by: Liam Wisehart <liamwisehart@meta.com>
Acked-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Fixes: 6fcd486b3a0a ("bpf: Refactor RCU enforcement in the verifier.")
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240427002544.68803-1-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: v6.6.35, v6.6.34, v6.6.33, v6.6.32, v6.6.31, v6.6.30, v6.6.29 |
|
| #
39f8a293 |
| 26-Apr-2024 |
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> |
bpf: Fix verifier assumptions about socket->sk
[ Upstream commit 0db63c0b86e981a1e97d2596d64ceceba1a5470e ]
The verifier assumes that 'sk' field in 'struct socket' is valid
and non-NULL when 'socke
bpf: Fix verifier assumptions about socket->sk
[ Upstream commit 0db63c0b86e981a1e97d2596d64ceceba1a5470e ]
The verifier assumes that 'sk' field in 'struct socket' is valid
and non-NULL when 'socket' pointer itself is trusted and non-NULL.
That may not be the case when socket was just created and
passed to LSM socket_accept hook.
Fix this verifier assumption and adjust tests.
Reported-by: Liam Wisehart <liamwisehart@meta.com>
Acked-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Fixes: 6fcd486b3a0a ("bpf: Refactor RCU enforcement in the verifier.")
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240427002544.68803-1-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: v6.6.35, v6.6.34, v6.6.33, v6.6.32, v6.6.31, v6.6.30, v6.6.29 |
|
| #
39f8a293 |
| 26-Apr-2024 |
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> |
bpf: Fix verifier assumptions about socket->sk
[ Upstream commit 0db63c0b86e981a1e97d2596d64ceceba1a5470e ]
The verifier assumes that 'sk' field in 'struct socket' is valid
and non-NULL when 'socke
bpf: Fix verifier assumptions about socket->sk
[ Upstream commit 0db63c0b86e981a1e97d2596d64ceceba1a5470e ]
The verifier assumes that 'sk' field in 'struct socket' is valid
and non-NULL when 'socket' pointer itself is trusted and non-NULL.
That may not be the case when socket was just created and
passed to LSM socket_accept hook.
Fix this verifier assumption and adjust tests.
Reported-by: Liam Wisehart <liamwisehart@meta.com>
Acked-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Fixes: 6fcd486b3a0a ("bpf: Refactor RCU enforcement in the verifier.")
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240427002544.68803-1-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: v6.6.28, v6.6.27, v6.6.26, v6.6.25, v6.6.24, v6.6.23, v6.6.16, v6.6.15, v6.6.14, v6.6.13, v6.6.12, v6.6.11, v6.6.10, v6.6.9, v6.6.8, v6.6.7, v6.6.6, v6.6.5, v6.6.4, v6.6.3, v6.6.2, v6.5.11, v6.6.1, v6.5.10, v6.6, v6.5.9, v6.5.8, v6.5.7, v6.5.6, v6.5.5, v6.5.4, v6.5.3, v6.5.2, v6.1.51, v6.5.1, v6.1.50, v6.5, v6.1.49, v6.1.48, v6.1.46, v6.1.45, v6.1.44, v6.1.43, v6.1.42, v6.1.41, v6.1.40, v6.1.39, v6.1.38, v6.1.37, v6.1.36, v6.4, v6.1.35, v6.1.34, v6.1.33, v6.1.32, v6.1.31, v6.1.30, v6.1.29, v6.1.28, v6.1.27, v6.1.26, v6.3, v6.1.25, v6.1.24, v6.1.23, v6.1.22, v6.1.21, v6.1.20, v6.1.19, v6.1.18, v6.1.17, v6.1.16, v6.1.15, v6.1.14, v6.1.13, v6.2, v6.1.12, v6.1.11, v6.1.10, v6.1.9, v6.1.8, v6.1.7, v6.1.6, v6.1.5, v6.0.19, v6.0.18, v6.1.4, v6.1.3, v6.0.17, v6.1.2, v6.0.16, v6.1.1, v6.0.15, v6.0.14, v6.0.13, v6.1, v6.0.12, v6.0.11, v6.0.10, v5.15.80, v6.0.9, v5.15.79 |
|
| #
c453e64c |
| 14-Nov-2022 |
Wang Yufen <wangyufen@huawei.com> |
selftests/bpf: fix memory leak of lsm_cgroup
kmemleak reports this issue:
unreferenced object 0xffff88810b7835c0 (size 32):
comm "test_progs", pid 270, jiffies 4294969007 (age 1621.315s)
hex du
selftests/bpf: fix memory leak of lsm_cgroup
kmemleak reports this issue:
unreferenced object 0xffff88810b7835c0 (size 32):
comm "test_progs", pid 270, jiffies 4294969007 (age 1621.315s)
hex dump (first 32 bytes):
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
03 00 00 00 03 00 00 00 0f 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
backtrace:
[<00000000376cdeab>] kmalloc_trace+0x27/0x110
[<000000003bcdb3b6>] selinux_sk_alloc_security+0x66/0x110
[<000000003959008f>] security_sk_alloc+0x47/0x80
[<00000000e7bc6668>] sk_prot_alloc+0xbd/0x1a0
[<0000000002d6343a>] sk_alloc+0x3b/0x940
[<000000009812a46d>] unix_create1+0x8f/0x3d0
[<000000005ed0976b>] unix_create+0xa1/0x150
[<0000000086a1d27f>] __sock_create+0x233/0x4a0
[<00000000cffe3a73>] __sys_socket_create.part.0+0xaa/0x110
[<0000000007c63f20>] __sys_socket+0x49/0xf0
[<00000000b08753c8>] __x64_sys_socket+0x42/0x50
[<00000000b56e26b3>] do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90
[<000000009b4871b8>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
The issue occurs in the following scenarios:
unix_create1()
sk_alloc()
sk_prot_alloc()
security_sk_alloc()
call_int_hook()
hlist_for_each_entry()
entry1->hook.sk_alloc_security
<-- selinux_sk_alloc_security() succeeded,
<-- sk->security alloced here.
entry2->hook.sk_alloc_security
<-- bpf_lsm_sk_alloc_security() failed
goto out_free;
... <-- the sk->security not freed, memleak
The core problem is that the LSM is not yet fully stacked (work is
actively going on in this space) which means that some LSM hooks do
not support multiple LSMs at the same time. To fix, skip the
"EPERM" test when it runs in the environments that already have
non-bpf lsms installed
Fixes: dca85aac8895 ("selftests/bpf: lsm_cgroup functional test")
Signed-off-by: Wang Yufen <wangyufen@huawei.com>
Cc: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1668482980-16163-1-git-send-email-wangyufen@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: v6.0.8, v5.15.78, v6.0.7, v5.15.77, v5.15.76, v6.0.6, v6.0.5, v5.15.75, v6.0.4, v6.0.3, v6.0.2, v5.15.74, v5.15.73, v6.0.1, v5.15.72, v6.0, v5.15.71, v5.15.70, v5.15.69, v5.15.68, v5.15.67, v5.15.66, v5.15.65, v5.15.64, v5.15.63, v5.15.62, v5.15.61, v5.15.60, v5.15.59, v5.19, v5.15.58, v5.15.57, v5.15.56, v5.15.55, v5.15.54 |
|
| #
d1a6edec |
| 08-Jul-2022 |
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> |
bpf: Check attach_func_proto more carefully in check_return_code
Syzkaller reports the following crash:
RIP: 0010:check_return_code kernel/bpf/verifier.c:10575 [inline]
RIP: 0010:do_check kerne
bpf: Check attach_func_proto more carefully in check_return_code
Syzkaller reports the following crash:
RIP: 0010:check_return_code kernel/bpf/verifier.c:10575 [inline]
RIP: 0010:do_check kernel/bpf/verifier.c:12346 [inline]
RIP: 0010:do_check_common+0xb3d2/0xd250 kernel/bpf/verifier.c:14610
With the following reproducer:
bpf$PROG_LOAD_XDP(0x5, &(0x7f00000004c0)={0xd, 0x3, &(0x7f0000000000)=ANY=[@ANYBLOB="1800000000000019000000000000000095"], &(0x7f0000000300)='GPL\x00', 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, '\x00', 0x0, 0x2b, 0xffffffffffffffff, 0x8, 0x0, 0x0, 0x10, 0x0}, 0x80)
Because we don't enforce expected_attach_type for XDP programs,
we end up in hitting 'if (prog->expected_attach_type == BPF_LSM_CGROUP'
part in check_return_code and follow up with testing
`prog->aux->attach_func_proto->type`, but `prog->aux->attach_func_proto`
is NULL.
Add explicit prog_type check for the "Note, BPF_LSM_CGROUP that
attach ..." condition. Also, don't skip return code check for
LSM/STRUCT_OPS.
The above actually brings an issue with existing selftest which
tries to return EPERM from void inet_csk_clone. Fix the
test (and move called_socket_clone to make sure it's not
incremented in case of an error) and add a new one to explicitly
verify this condition.
Fixes: 69fd337a975c ("bpf: per-cgroup lsm flavor")
Reported-by: syzbot+5cc0730bd4b4d2c5f152@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220708175000.2603078-1-sdf@google.com
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: v5.15.53, v5.15.52, v5.15.51 |
|
| #
dca85aac |
| 28-Jun-2022 |
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> |
selftests/bpf: lsm_cgroup functional test
Functional test that exercises the following:
1. apply default sk_priority policy
2. permit TX-only AF_PACKET socket
3. cgroup attach/detach/replace
4. reu
selftests/bpf: lsm_cgroup functional test
Functional test that exercises the following:
1. apply default sk_priority policy
2. permit TX-only AF_PACKET socket
3. cgroup attach/detach/replace
4. reusing trampoline shim
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220628174314.1216643-12-sdf@google.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
show more ...
|