selftests/bpf: Wait for receive in cg_storage_multi test

In some cases the loopback latency might be large enough, causing
the assertion on invocations to be run before ingress prog getting
executed

selftests/bpf: Wait for receive in cg_storage_multi test

In some cases the loopback latency might be large enough, causing
the assertion on invocations to be run before ingress prog getting
executed. The assertion would fail and the test would flake.

This can be reliably reproduced by arbitrarily increasing the
loopback latency (thanks to [1]):
tc qdisc add dev lo root handle 1: htb default 12
tc class add dev lo parent 1:1 classid 1:12 htb rate 20kbps ceil 20kbps
tc qdisc add dev lo parent 1:12 netem delay 100ms

Fix this by waiting on the receive end, instead of instantly
returning to the assert. The call to read() will wait for the
default SO_RCVTIMEO timeout of 3 seconds provided by
start_server().

[1] https://gist.github.com/kstevens715/4598301

Reported-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/9c5c8b7e-1d89-a3af-5400-14fde81f4429@linux.dev/
Fixes: 3573f384014f ("selftests/bpf: Test CGROUP_STORAGE behavior on shared egress + ingress")
Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Signed-off-by: YiFei Zhu <zhuyifei@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230405193354.1956209-1-zhuyifei@google.com
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>

show more ...

selfetest/bpf: Make some tests serial

Change tests that often fails in parallel execution mode to serial.

Signed-off-by: Yucong Sun <sunyucong@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kern

selfetest/bpf: Make some tests serial

Change tests that often fails in parallel execution mode to serial.

Signed-off-by: Yucong Sun <sunyucong@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211006185619.364369-15-fallentree@fb.com

show more ...

selftests/bpf: Turn on libbpf 1.0 mode and fix all IS_ERR checks

Turn ony libbpf 1.0 mode. Fix all the explicit IS_ERR checks that now will be
broken because libbpf returns NULL on error (and sets e

selftests/bpf: Turn on libbpf 1.0 mode and fix all IS_ERR checks

Turn ony libbpf 1.0 mode. Fix all the explicit IS_ERR checks that now will be
broken because libbpf returns NULL on error (and sets errno). Fix
ASSERT_OK_PTR and ASSERT_ERR_PTR to work for both old mode and new modes and
use them throughout selftests. This is trivial to do by using
libbpf_get_error() API that all libbpf users are supposed to use, instead of
IS_ERR checks.

A bunch of checks also did explicit -1 comparison for various fd-returning
APIs. Such checks are replaced with >= 0 or < 0 cases.

There were also few misuses of bpf_object__find_map_by_name() in test_maps.
Those are fixed in this patch as well.

Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210525035935.1461796-3-andrii@kernel.org

show more ...

selftests/bpf: Don't destroy failed link

Check that link is NULL or proper pointer before invoking bpf_link__destroy().
Not doing this causes crash in test_progs, when cg_storage_multi selftest
fail

selftests/bpf: Don't destroy failed link

Check that link is NULL or proper pointer before invoking bpf_link__destroy().
Not doing this causes crash in test_progs, when cg_storage_multi selftest
fails.

Fixes: 3573f384014f ("selftests/bpf: Test CGROUP_STORAGE behavior on shared egress + ingress")
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200729045056.3363921-1-andriin@fb.com

show more ...

selftests/bpf: Test CGROUP_STORAGE behavior on shared egress + ingress

This mirrors the original egress-only test. The cgroup_storage is
now extended to have two packet counters, one for egress and

selftests/bpf: Test CGROUP_STORAGE behavior on shared egress + ingress

This mirrors the original egress-only test. The cgroup_storage is
now extended to have two packet counters, one for egress and one
for ingress. We also extend to have two egress programs to test
that egress will always share with other egress origrams in the
same cgroup. The behavior of the counters are exactly the same as
the original egress-only test.

The test is split into two, one "isolated" test that when the key
type is struct bpf_cgroup_storage_key, which contains the attach
type, programs of different attach types will see different
storages. The other, "shared" test that when the key type is u64,
programs of different attach types will see the same storage if
they are attached to the same cgroup.

Signed-off-by: YiFei Zhu <zhuyifei@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/c756f5f1521227b8e6e90a453299dda722d7324d.1595565795.git.zhuyifei@google.com

show more ...

selftests/bpf: Test CGROUP_STORAGE map can't be used by multiple progs

The current assumption is that the lifetime of a cgroup storage
is tied to the program's attachment. The storage is created in

selftests/bpf: Test CGROUP_STORAGE map can't be used by multiple progs

The current assumption is that the lifetime of a cgroup storage
is tied to the program's attachment. The storage is created in
cgroup_bpf_attach, and released upon cgroup_bpf_detach and
cgroup_bpf_release.

Because the current semantics is that each attachment gets a
completely independent cgroup storage, and you can have multiple
programs attached to the same (cgroup, attach type) pair, the key
of the CGROUP_STORAGE map, looking up the map with this pair could
yield multiple storages, and that is not permitted. Therefore,
the kernel verifier checks that two programs cannot share the same
CGROUP_STORAGE map, even if they have different expected attach
types, considering that the actual attach type does not always
have to be equal to the expected attach type.

The test creates a CGROUP_STORAGE map and make it shared across
two different programs, one cgroup_skb/egress and one /ingress.
It asserts that the two programs cannot be both loaded, due to
verifier failure from the above reason.

Signed-off-by: YiFei Zhu <zhuyifei@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/30a6b0da67ae6b0296c4d511bfb19c5f3d035916.1595565795.git.zhuyifei@google.com

show more ...

selftests/bpf: Add test for CGROUP_STORAGE map on multiple attaches

This test creates a parent cgroup, and a child of that cgroup.
It attaches a cgroup_skb/egress program that simply counts packets,

selftests/bpf: Add test for CGROUP_STORAGE map on multiple attaches

This test creates a parent cgroup, and a child of that cgroup.
It attaches a cgroup_skb/egress program that simply counts packets,
to a global variable (ARRAY map), and to a CGROUP_STORAGE map.
The program is first attached to the parent cgroup only, then to
parent and child.

The test cases sends a message within the child cgroup, and because
the program is inherited across parent / child cgroups, it will
trigger the egress program for both the parent and child, if they
exist. The program, when looking up a CGROUP_STORAGE map, uses the
cgroup and attach type of the attachment parameters; therefore,
both attaches uses different cgroup storages.

We assert that all packet counts returns what we expects.

Signed-off-by: YiFei Zhu <zhuyifei@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/5a20206afa4606144691c7caa0d1b997cd60dec0.1595565795.git.zhuyifei@google.com

show more ...

selftests/bpf: Don't destroy failed link

Check that link is NULL or proper pointer before invoking bpf_link__destroy().
Not doing this causes crash in test_progs, when cg_storage_multi s

selftests/bpf: Don't destroy failed link

Check that link is NULL or proper pointer before invoking bpf_link__destroy().
Not doing this causes crash in test_progs, when cg_storage_multi selftest
fails.

Fixes: 3573f384014f ("selftests/bpf: Test CGROUP_STORAGE behavior on shared egress + ingress")
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200729045056.3363921-1-andriin@fb.com

show more ...

selftests/bpf: Test CGROUP_STORAGE behavior on shared egress + ingress

This mirrors the original egress-only test. The cgroup_storage is
now extended to have two packet counters, one for

selftests/bpf: Test CGROUP_STORAGE behavior on shared egress + ingress

This mirrors the original egress-only test. The cgroup_storage is
now extended to have two packet counters, one for egress and one
for ingress. We also extend to have two egress programs to test
that egress will always share with other egress origrams in the
same cgroup. The behavior of the counters are exactly the same as
the original egress-only test.

The test is split into two, one "isolated" test that when the key
type is struct bpf_cgroup_storage_key, which contains the attach
type, programs of different attach types will see different
storages. The other, "shared" test that when the key type is u64,
programs of different attach types will see the same storage if
they are attached to the same cgroup.

Signed-off-by: YiFei Zhu <zhuyifei@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/c756f5f1521227b8e6e90a453299dda722d7324d.1595565795.git.zhuyifei@google.com

show more ...

selftests/bpf: Test CGROUP_STORAGE map can't be used by multiple progs

The current assumption is that the lifetime of a cgroup storage
is tied to the program's attachment. The storage is

selftests/bpf: Test CGROUP_STORAGE map can't be used by multiple progs

The current assumption is that the lifetime of a cgroup storage
is tied to the program's attachment. The storage is created in
cgroup_bpf_attach, and released upon cgroup_bpf_detach and
cgroup_bpf_release.

Because the current semantics is that each attachment gets a
completely independent cgroup storage, and you can have multiple
programs attached to the same (cgroup, attach type) pair, the key
of the CGROUP_STORAGE map, looking up the map with this pair could
yield multiple storages, and that is not permitted. Therefore,
the kernel verifier checks that two programs cannot share the same
CGROUP_STORAGE map, even if they have different expected attach
types, considering that the actual attach type does not always
have to be equal to the expected attach type.

The test creates a CGROUP_STORAGE map and make it shared across
two different programs, one cgroup_skb/egress and one /ingress.
It asserts that the two programs cannot be both loaded, due to
verifier failure from the above reason.

Signed-off-by: YiFei Zhu <zhuyifei@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/30a6b0da67ae6b0296c4d511bfb19c5f3d035916.1595565795.git.zhuyifei@google.com

show more ...

selftests/bpf: Add test for CGROUP_STORAGE map on multiple attaches

This test creates a parent cgroup, and a child of that cgroup.
It attaches a cgroup_skb/egress program that simply cou

selftests/bpf: Add test for CGROUP_STORAGE map on multiple attaches

This test creates a parent cgroup, and a child of that cgroup.
It attaches a cgroup_skb/egress program that simply counts packets,
to a global variable (ARRAY map), and to a CGROUP_STORAGE map.
The program is first attached to the parent cgroup only, then to
parent and child.

The test cases sends a message within the child cgroup, and because
the program is inherited across parent / child cgroups, it will
trigger the egress program for both the parent and child, if they
exist. The program, when looking up a CGROUP_STORAGE map, uses the
cgroup and attach type of the attachment parameters; therefore,
both attaches uses different cgroup storages.

We assert that all packet counts returns what we expects.

Signed-off-by: YiFei Zhu <zhuyifei@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/5a20206afa4606144691c7caa0d1b997cd60dec0.1595565795.git.zhuyifei@google.com

show more ...