|
Revision tags: v6.6.25, v6.6.24, v6.6.23, v6.6.16, v6.6.15, v6.6.14, v6.6.13, v6.6.12, v6.6.11, v6.6.10, v6.6.9, v6.6.8, v6.6.7, v6.6.6, v6.6.5, v6.6.4, v6.6.3, v6.6.2, v6.5.11, v6.6.1, v6.5.10, v6.6, v6.5.9, v6.5.8, v6.5.7, v6.5.6, v6.5.5, v6.5.4, v6.5.3, v6.5.2, v6.1.51, v6.5.1, v6.1.50, v6.5, v6.1.49, v6.1.48, v6.1.46, v6.1.45, v6.1.44, v6.1.43, v6.1.42, v6.1.41, v6.1.40, v6.1.39, v6.1.38, v6.1.37, v6.1.36, v6.4, v6.1.35, v6.1.34, v6.1.33, v6.1.32, v6.1.31, v6.1.30, v6.1.29, v6.1.28, v6.1.27, v6.1.26, v6.3, v6.1.25, v6.1.24, v6.1.23, v6.1.22, v6.1.21, v6.1.20, v6.1.19, v6.1.18, v6.1.17, v6.1.16, v6.1.15, v6.1.14, v6.1.13, v6.2, v6.1.12, v6.1.11, v6.1.10, v6.1.9, v6.1.8, v6.1.7, v6.1.6, v6.1.5, v6.0.19, v6.0.18, v6.1.4, v6.1.3, v6.0.17, v6.1.2, v6.0.16, v6.1.1, v6.0.15, v6.0.14, v6.0.13, v6.1, v6.0.12, v6.0.11, v6.0.10, v5.15.80, v6.0.9, v5.15.79, v6.0.8, v5.15.78, v6.0.7, v5.15.77, v5.15.76, v6.0.6, v6.0.5, v5.15.75, v6.0.4, v6.0.3, v6.0.2, v5.15.74, v5.15.73, v6.0.1, v5.15.72, v6.0, v5.15.71, v5.15.70, v5.15.69, v5.15.68, v5.15.67, v5.15.66, v5.15.65, v5.15.64, v5.15.63, v5.15.62, v5.15.61, v5.15.60, v5.15.59, v5.19, v5.15.58, v5.15.57, v5.15.56, v5.15.55, v5.15.54, v5.15.53, v5.15.52, v5.15.51, v5.15.50, v5.15.49, v5.15.48, v5.15.47, v5.15.46, v5.15.45, v5.15.44, v5.15.43, v5.15.42, v5.18, v5.15.41, v5.15.40, v5.15.39 |
|
| #
0639e022 |
| 10-May-2022 |
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> |
selftests/arm64: Use switch statements in mte_common_util.c
In the MTE tests there are several places where we use chains of if
statements to open code what could be written as switch statements, mo
selftests/arm64: Use switch statements in mte_common_util.c
In the MTE tests there are several places where we use chains of if
statements to open code what could be written as switch statements, move
over to switch statements to make the idiom clearer.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220510164520.768783-6-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
show more ...
|
| #
ffc8274c |
| 10-May-2022 |
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> |
selftests/arm64: Allow zero tags in mte_switch_mode()
mte_switch_mode() currently rejects attempts to set a zero tag however
there are tests such as check_tags_inclusion which attempt to cover cases
selftests/arm64: Allow zero tags in mte_switch_mode()
mte_switch_mode() currently rejects attempts to set a zero tag however
there are tests such as check_tags_inclusion which attempt to cover cases
with zero tags using mte_switch_mode(). Since it is not clear why we are
rejecting zero tags change the test to accept them.
The issue has not previously been as apparent as it should be since the
return value of mte_switch_mode() was not always checked in the callers
and the tests weren't otherwise failing.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220510164520.768783-3-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: v5.15.38, v5.15.37, v5.15.36, v5.15.35 |
|
| #
f326c9a6 |
| 19-Apr-2022 |
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> |
kselftest/arm64: Refactor parameter checking in mte_switch_mode()
Currently we just have a big if statement with a non-specific diagnostic
checking both the mode and the tag. Since we'll need to dyn
kselftest/arm64: Refactor parameter checking in mte_switch_mode()
Currently we just have a big if statement with a non-specific diagnostic
checking both the mode and the tag. Since we'll need to dynamically check
for asymmetric mode support in the system and to improve debugability split
these checks out.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220419103243.24774-4-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
show more ...
|
| #
191e678b |
| 19-Apr-2022 |
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> |
kselftest/arm64: Log unexpected asynchronous MTE faults
Help people figure out problems by printing a diagnostic when we get an
unexpected asynchronous fault.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@ker
kselftest/arm64: Log unexpected asynchronous MTE faults
Help people figure out problems by printing a diagnostic when we get an
unexpected asynchronous fault.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220419103243.24774-3-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: v5.15.34, v5.15.33, v5.15.32, v5.15.31, v5.17, v5.15.30, v5.15.29, v5.15.28, v5.15.27, v5.15.26, v5.15.25, v5.15.24, v5.15.23, v5.15.22, v5.15.21, v5.15.20, v5.15.19, v5.15.18, v5.15.17, v5.4.173, v5.15.16, v5.15.15, v5.16, v5.15.10, v5.15.9, v5.15.8, v5.15.7, v5.15.6, v5.15.5, v5.15.4, v5.15.3, v5.15.2, v5.15.1, v5.15, v5.14.14, v5.14.13, v5.14.12, v5.14.11, v5.14.10, v5.14.9, v5.14.8, v5.14.7, v5.14.6, v5.10.67, v5.10.66, v5.14.5, v5.14.4, v5.10.65, v5.14.3, v5.10.64, v5.14.2, v5.10.63, v5.14.1, v5.10.62, v5.14, v5.10.61 |
|
| #
83e5dcbe |
| 19-Aug-2021 |
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> |
kselftest/arm64: mte: Fix misleading output when skipping tests
When skipping the tests due to a lack of system support for MTE we
currently print a message saying FAIL which makes it look like the
kselftest/arm64: mte: Fix misleading output when skipping tests
When skipping the tests due to a lack of system support for MTE we
currently print a message saying FAIL which makes it look like the test
failed even though the test did actually report KSFT_SKIP, creating some
confusion. Change the error message to say SKIP instead so things are
clearer.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210819172902.56211-1-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: v5.10.60, v5.10.53, v5.10.52, v5.10.51, v5.10.50, v5.10.49, v5.13, v5.10.46, v5.10.43, v5.10.42, v5.10.41, v5.10.40, v5.10.39, v5.4.119, v5.10.36, v5.10.35, v5.10.34, v5.4.116, v5.10.33, v5.12, v5.10.32, v5.10.31, v5.10.30, v5.10.27, v5.10.26, v5.10.25 |
|
| #
75347add |
| 19-Mar-2021 |
Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com> |
kselftest/arm64: mte: Report filename on failing temp file creation
The MTE selftests create temporary files in /dev/shm, for later mmap-ing
them. When there is no tmpfs mounted on /dev/shm, or /dev
kselftest/arm64: mte: Report filename on failing temp file creation
The MTE selftests create temporary files in /dev/shm, for later mmap-ing
them. When there is no tmpfs mounted on /dev/shm, or /dev/shm does not
exist in the first place (on minimal filesystems), the error message is
not giving good hints:
# FAIL: Unable to open temporary file
# FAIL: memory allocation
not ok 17 Check initial tags with private mapping, ...
Add a perror() call, that gives both the filename and the actual error
reason, so that users get a chance of correcting that.
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broone@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210319165334.29213-12-andre.przywara@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
show more ...
|
| #
b4e1fa22 |
| 19-Mar-2021 |
Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com> |
kselftest/arm64: mte: Fix clang warning
if (!prctl(...) == 0) is not only cumbersome to read, it also upsets
clang and triggers a warning:
------------
mte_common_util.c:287:6: warning: logical not
kselftest/arm64: mte: Fix clang warning
if (!prctl(...) == 0) is not only cumbersome to read, it also upsets
clang and triggers a warning:
------------
mte_common_util.c:287:6: warning: logical not is only applied to the
left hand side of this comparison [-Wlogical-not-parentheses]
....
Fix that by just comparing against "not 0" instead.
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broone@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210319165334.29213-11-andre.przywara@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
show more ...
|
| #
59243286 |
| 19-Mar-2021 |
Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com> |
kselftest/arm64: mte: Fix MTE feature detection
To check whether the CPU and kernel support the MTE features we want
to test, we use an (emulated) CPU ID register read. However we only
check against
kselftest/arm64: mte: Fix MTE feature detection
To check whether the CPU and kernel support the MTE features we want
to test, we use an (emulated) CPU ID register read. However we only
check against a very particular feature version (0b0010), even though
the ARM ARM promises ID register features to be backwards compatible.
While this could be fixed by using ">=" instead of "==", we should
actually use the explicit HWCAP2_MTE hardware capability, exposed by the
kernel via the ELF auxiliary vectors.
That moves this responsibility to the kernel, and fixes running the
tests on machines with FEAT_MTE3 capability.
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broone@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210319165334.29213-7-andre.przywara@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
show more ...
|
| #
d302a702 |
| 19-Mar-2021 |
Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com> |
kselftest/arm64: mte: common: Fix write() warnings
Out of the box Ubuntu's 20.04 compiler warns about missing return value
checks for write() (sys)calls.
Make GCC happy by checking whether we actua
kselftest/arm64: mte: common: Fix write() warnings
Out of the box Ubuntu's 20.04 compiler warns about missing return value
checks for write() (sys)calls.
Make GCC happy by checking whether we actually managed to write out our
buffer.
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broone@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210319165334.29213-6-andre.przywara@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
show more ...
|
| #
9486d7ac |
| 19-Aug-2021 |
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> |
kselftest/arm64: mte: Fix misleading output when skipping tests
[ Upstream commit 83e5dcbece4ea67ec3ad94b897e2844184802fd7 ]
When skipping the tests due to a lack of system support for MTE we
curre
kselftest/arm64: mte: Fix misleading output when skipping tests
[ Upstream commit 83e5dcbece4ea67ec3ad94b897e2844184802fd7 ]
When skipping the tests due to a lack of system support for MTE we
currently print a message saying FAIL which makes it look like the test
failed even though the test did actually report KSFT_SKIP, creating some
confusion. Change the error message to say SKIP instead so things are
clearer.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210819172902.56211-1-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
show more ...
|
| #
f38f972e |
| 19-Mar-2021 |
Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com> |
kselftest/arm64: mte: Fix MTE feature detection
[ Upstream commit 592432862cc4019075a7196d9961562c49507d6f ]
To check whether the CPU and kernel support the MTE features we want
to test, we use an
kselftest/arm64: mte: Fix MTE feature detection
[ Upstream commit 592432862cc4019075a7196d9961562c49507d6f ]
To check whether the CPU and kernel support the MTE features we want
to test, we use an (emulated) CPU ID register read. However we only
check against a very particular feature version (0b0010), even though
the ARM ARM promises ID register features to be backwards compatible.
While this could be fixed by using ">=" instead of "==", we should
actually use the explicit HWCAP2_MTE hardware capability, exposed by the
kernel via the ELF auxiliary vectors.
That moves this responsibility to the kernel, and fixes running the
tests on machines with FEAT_MTE3 capability.
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broone@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210319165334.29213-7-andre.przywara@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: v5.10.24, v5.10.23, v5.10.22, v5.10.21, v5.10.20, v5.10.19, v5.4.101, v5.10.18, v5.10.17, v5.11, v5.10.16, v5.10.15, v5.10.14, v5.10, v5.8.17, v5.8.16, v5.8.15, v5.9, v5.8.14 |
|
| #
e9b60476 |
| 02-Oct-2020 |
Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.kachhap@arm.com> |
kselftest/arm64: Add utilities and a test to validate mte memory
This test checks that the memory tag is present after mte allocation and
the memory is accessible with those tags. This testcase veri
kselftest/arm64: Add utilities and a test to validate mte memory
This test checks that the memory tag is present after mte allocation and
the memory is accessible with those tags. This testcase verifies all
sync, async and none mte error reporting mode. The allocated mte buffers
are verified for Allocated range (no error expected while accessing
buffer), Underflow range, and Overflow range.
Different test scenarios covered here are,
* Verify that mte memory are accessible at byte/block level.
* Force underflow and overflow to occur and check the data consistency.
* Check to/from between tagged and untagged memory.
* Check that initial allocated memory to have 0 tag.
This change also creates the necessary infrastructure to add mte test
cases. MTE kselftests can use the several utility functions provided here
to add wide variety of mte test scenarios.
GCC compiler need flag '-march=armv8.5-a+memtag' so those flags are
verified before compilation.
The mte testcases can be launched with kselftest framework as,
make TARGETS=arm64 ARM64_SUBTARGETS=mte kselftest
or compiled as,
make -C tools/testing/selftests TARGETS=arm64 ARM64_SUBTARGETS=mte CC='compiler'
Co-developed-by: Gabor Kertesz <gabor.kertesz@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Gabor Kertesz <gabor.kertesz@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.kachhap@arm.com>
Tested-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201002115630.24683-2-amit.kachhap@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
show more ...
|
| #
9486d7ac |
| 19-Aug-2021 |
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> |
kselftest/arm64: mte: Fix misleading output when skipping tests
[ Upstream commit 83e5dcbece4ea67ec3ad94b897e2844184802fd7 ]
When skipping the tests due to a lack of system support
kselftest/arm64: mte: Fix misleading output when skipping tests
[ Upstream commit 83e5dcbece4ea67ec3ad94b897e2844184802fd7 ]
When skipping the tests due to a lack of system support for MTE we
currently print a message saying FAIL which makes it look like the test
failed even though the test did actually report KSFT_SKIP, creating some
confusion. Change the error message to say SKIP instead so things are
clearer.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210819172902.56211-1-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
show more ...
|
| #
f38f972e |
| 19-Mar-2021 |
Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com> |
kselftest/arm64: mte: Fix MTE feature detection
[ Upstream commit 592432862cc4019075a7196d9961562c49507d6f ]
To check whether the CPU and kernel support the MTE features we want
kselftest/arm64: mte: Fix MTE feature detection
[ Upstream commit 592432862cc4019075a7196d9961562c49507d6f ]
To check whether the CPU and kernel support the MTE features we want
to test, we use an (emulated) CPU ID register read. However we only
check against a very particular feature version (0b0010), even though
the ARM ARM promises ID register features to be backwards compatible.
While this could be fixed by using ">=" instead of "==", we should
actually use the explicit HWCAP2_MTE hardware capability, exposed by the
kernel via the ELF auxiliary vectors.
That moves this responsibility to the kernel, and fixes running the
tests on machines with FEAT_MTE3 capability.
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broone@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210319165334.29213-7-andre.przywara@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: v5.10.24, v5.10.23, v5.10.22, v5.10.21, v5.10.20, v5.10.19, v5.4.101, v5.10.18, v5.10.17, v5.11, v5.10.16, v5.10.15, v5.10.14, v5.10, v5.8.17, v5.8.16, v5.8.15, v5.9, v5.8.14 |
|
| #
e9b60476 |
| 02-Oct-2020 |
Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.kachhap@arm.com> |
kselftest/arm64: Add utilities and a test to validate mte memory
This test checks that the memory tag is present after mte allocation and
the memory is accessible with those tags. This t
kselftest/arm64: Add utilities and a test to validate mte memory
This test checks that the memory tag is present after mte allocation and
the memory is accessible with those tags. This testcase verifies all
sync, async and none mte error reporting mode. The allocated mte buffers
are verified for Allocated range (no error expected while accessing
buffer), Underflow range, and Overflow range.
Different test scenarios covered here are,
* Verify that mte memory are accessible at byte/block level.
* Force underflow and overflow to occur and check the data consistency.
* Check to/from between tagged and untagged memory.
* Check that initial allocated memory to have 0 tag.
This change also creates the necessary infrastructure to add mte test
cases. MTE kselftests can use the several utility functions provided here
to add wide variety of mte test scenarios.
GCC compiler need flag '-march=armv8.5-a+memtag' so those flags are
verified before compilation.
The mte testcases can be launched with kselftest framework as,
make TARGETS=arm64 ARM64_SUBTARGETS=mte kselftest
or compiled as,
make -C tools/testing/selftests TARGETS=arm64 ARM64_SUBTARGETS=mte CC='compiler'
Co-developed-by: Gabor Kertesz <gabor.kertesz@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Gabor Kertesz <gabor.kertesz@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.kachhap@arm.com>
Tested-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201002115630.24683-2-amit.kachhap@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
show more ...
|