|
Revision tags: v6.6.25, v6.6.24, v6.6.23, v6.6.16, v6.6.15, v6.6.14, v6.6.13, v6.6.12, v6.6.11, v6.6.10, v6.6.9, v6.6.8, v6.6.7, v6.6.6, v6.6.5, v6.6.4, v6.6.3, v6.6.2, v6.5.11, v6.6.1, v6.5.10, v6.6, v6.5.9, v6.5.8, v6.5.7, v6.5.6, v6.5.5, v6.5.4, v6.5.3, v6.5.2, v6.1.51, v6.5.1, v6.1.50, v6.5, v6.1.49, v6.1.48, v6.1.46, v6.1.45, v6.1.44, v6.1.43, v6.1.42, v6.1.41, v6.1.40, v6.1.39, v6.1.38, v6.1.37, v6.1.36, v6.4, v6.1.35 |
|
| #
a4956811 |
| 15-Jun-2023 |
Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> |
arm64: dts: ti: Unify pin group node names for make dtbs checks
Prepare for pinctrl-single yaml binding and unify pin group node names.
Let's standardize on pin group node naming ending in -pins. A
arm64: dts: ti: Unify pin group node names for make dtbs checks
Prepare for pinctrl-single yaml binding and unify pin group node names.
Let's standardize on pin group node naming ending in -pins. As we don't
necessarily have a SoC specific compatible property for pinctrl-single.
I'd rather not add a pattern match for pins somewhere in the name for all
the users.
Trying to add matches for pins-default will be futile as on the earlier
SoCs we've already seen names like pins-sleep, pins-idle, pins-off and so
on that would need to be matched.
And as the node is a pin group, let's prefer to use naming -pins rather
than -pin as more pins may need to be added to the pin group later on.
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
[vigneshr@ti.com: Rebase onto latest ti/next and extend to new nodes]
Signed-off-by: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: v6.1.34, v6.1.33, v6.1.32, v6.1.31, v6.1.30, v6.1.29, v6.1.28, v6.1.27, v6.1.26, v6.3, v6.1.25, v6.1.24, v6.1.23, v6.1.22, v6.1.21, v6.1.20, v6.1.19, v6.1.18, v6.1.17, v6.1.16, v6.1.15, v6.1.14, v6.1.13, v6.2, v6.1.12, v6.1.11, v6.1.10, v6.1.9, v6.1.8, v6.1.7, v6.1.6, v6.1.5, v6.0.19, v6.0.18, v6.1.4, v6.1.3, v6.0.17, v6.1.2, v6.0.16, v6.1.1, v6.0.15, v6.0.14, v6.0.13, v6.1, v6.0.12, v6.0.11, v6.0.10, v5.15.80, v6.0.9, v5.15.79, v6.0.8, v5.15.78, v6.0.7, v5.15.77, v5.15.76, v6.0.6 |
|
| #
65e8781a |
| 28-Oct-2022 |
Andrew Davis <afd@ti.com> |
arm64: dts: ti: k3-am65: Enable UART nodes at the board level
UART nodes defined in the top-level AM65x SoC dtsi files are incomplete
and may not be functional unless they are extended with pinmux
i
arm64: dts: ti: k3-am65: Enable UART nodes at the board level
UART nodes defined in the top-level AM65x SoC dtsi files are incomplete
and may not be functional unless they are extended with pinmux
information.
As the pinmux is only known at the board integration level, these
nodes should only be enabled when provided with this information.
Disable the UART nodes in the dtsi files and only enable the ones that
are actually pinned out on a given board.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Davis <afd@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Tested-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
Reviewed-by: Bryan Brattlof <bb@ti.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221028142417.10642-2-afd@ti.com
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: v6.0.5, v5.15.75, v6.0.4, v6.0.3, v6.0.2, v5.15.74, v5.15.73, v6.0.1, v5.15.72, v6.0, v5.15.71, v5.15.70, v5.15.69, v5.15.68, v5.15.67, v5.15.66, v5.15.65, v5.15.64, v5.15.63, v5.15.62, v5.15.61, v5.15.60, v5.15.59, v5.19, v5.15.58, v5.15.57, v5.15.56, v5.15.55, v5.15.54, v5.15.53, v5.15.52, v5.15.51, v5.15.50, v5.15.49, v5.15.48, v5.15.47, v5.15.46, v5.15.45, v5.15.44, v5.15.43, v5.15.42, v5.18, v5.15.41, v5.15.40, v5.15.39, v5.15.38, v5.15.37, v5.15.36, v5.15.35, v5.15.34, v5.15.33, v5.15.32, v5.15.31, v5.17, v5.15.30, v5.15.29, v5.15.28, v5.15.27, v5.15.26, v5.15.25, v5.15.24, v5.15.23, v5.15.22, v5.15.21, v5.15.20, v5.15.19, v5.15.18, v5.15.17, v5.4.173, v5.15.16, v5.15.15, v5.16, v5.15.10, v5.15.9, v5.15.8, v5.15.7, v5.15.6, v5.15.5, v5.15.4, v5.15.3, v5.15.2, v5.15.1, v5.15, v5.14.14, v5.14.13, v5.14.12, v5.14.11, v5.14.10, v5.14.9, v5.14.8 |
|
| #
a9dbf044 |
| 26-Sep-2021 |
Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com> |
arm64: dts: ti: iot2050: Prepare for adding 2nd-generation boards
The current IOT2050 devices are Product Generation 1 (PG1), using SR1.0
AM65x silicon. Upcoming PG2 devices will use SR2.x SoCs and
arm64: dts: ti: iot2050: Prepare for adding 2nd-generation boards
The current IOT2050 devices are Product Generation 1 (PG1), using SR1.0
AM65x silicon. Upcoming PG2 devices will use SR2.x SoCs and will
therefore need separate device trees. Prepare for that by factoring out
common bits that will be shared across both generations.
At this chance, drop a link to the product homepage to in the top-level
dts files. Also fix a typo in my email address in some headers.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/31fece05f9728a852c0632985c4fa537cced4ece.1632657917.git.jan.kiszka@web.de
show more ...
|