History log of /openbmc/linux/scripts/dtc/include-prefixes/arm64/ti/k3-am64-phycore-som.dtsi (Results 1 – 5 of 5)
Revision (<<< Hide revision tags) (Show revision tags >>>) Date Author Comments
Revision tags: v6.6.25, v6.6.24, v6.6.23, v6.6.16, v6.6.15, v6.6.14, v6.6.13, v6.6.12, v6.6.11, v6.6.10, v6.6.9, v6.6.8, v6.6.7, v6.6.6, v6.6.5, v6.6.4, v6.6.3, v6.6.2
# b0e4672f 17-Nov-2023 Andrew Davis <afd@ti.com>

arm64: dts: ti: k3-am64: Enable SDHCI nodes at the board level

[ Upstream commit 3b6345e3fcf4c93a79f396121cd0e6f98f04da13 ]

SDHCI nodes defined in the top-level AM64 SoC dtsi files are incomplete
a

arm64: dts: ti: k3-am64: Enable SDHCI nodes at the board level

[ Upstream commit 3b6345e3fcf4c93a79f396121cd0e6f98f04da13 ]

SDHCI nodes defined in the top-level AM64 SoC dtsi files are incomplete
and will not be functional unless they are extended.

As the attached SD/eMMC is only known about at the board integration level,
these nodes should only be enabled when provided with this information.

Disable the SDHCI nodes in the dtsi files and only enable the ones that
are actually pinned out on a given board.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Davis <afd@ti.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231117163339.89952-2-afd@ti.com
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Stable-dep-of: 379c7752bbd0 ("arm64: dts: ti: k3-am64-main: Fix ITAP/OTAP values for MMC")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

show more ...


Revision tags: v6.5.11, v6.6.1, v6.5.10, v6.6, v6.5.9, v6.5.8, v6.5.7, v6.5.6, v6.5.5, v6.5.4, v6.5.3, v6.5.2, v6.1.51, v6.5.1, v6.1.50, v6.5, v6.1.49, v6.1.48, v6.1.46, v6.1.45
# cd9f6b32 09-Aug-2023 Andrew Davis <afd@ti.com>

arm64: dts: ti: k3-am64: Enable OSPI nodes at the board level

OSPI nodes defined in the top-level AM64 SoC dtsi files are incomplete
and may not be functional unless they are extended with pinmux an

arm64: dts: ti: k3-am64: Enable OSPI nodes at the board level

OSPI nodes defined in the top-level AM64 SoC dtsi files are incomplete
and may not be functional unless they are extended with pinmux and
device information.

As the attached OSPI device is only known about at the board integration
level, these nodes should only be enabled when provided with this
information.

Disable the OSPI nodes in the dtsi files and only enable the ones that
are actually pinned out on a given board.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Davis <afd@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Dhruva Gole <d-gole@ti.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230810003814.85450-8-afd@ti.com
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>

show more ...


Revision tags: v6.1.44, v6.1.43, v6.1.42, v6.1.41, v6.1.40, v6.1.39, v6.1.38, v6.1.37, v6.1.36, v6.4, v6.1.35
# a4956811 15-Jun-2023 Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>

arm64: dts: ti: Unify pin group node names for make dtbs checks

Prepare for pinctrl-single yaml binding and unify pin group node names.

Let's standardize on pin group node naming ending in -pins. A

arm64: dts: ti: Unify pin group node names for make dtbs checks

Prepare for pinctrl-single yaml binding and unify pin group node names.

Let's standardize on pin group node naming ending in -pins. As we don't
necessarily have a SoC specific compatible property for pinctrl-single.
I'd rather not add a pattern match for pins somewhere in the name for all
the users.

Trying to add matches for pins-default will be futile as on the earlier
SoCs we've already seen names like pins-sleep, pins-idle, pins-off and so
on that would need to be matched.

And as the node is a pin group, let's prefer to use naming -pins rather
than -pin as more pins may need to be added to the pin group later on.

Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
[vigneshr@ti.com: Rebase onto latest ti/next and extend to new nodes]
Signed-off-by: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>

show more ...


Revision tags: v6.1.34, v6.1.33, v6.1.32, v6.1.31, v6.1.30, v6.1.29
# 91f983ff 15-May-2023 Andrew Davis <afd@ti.com>

arm64: dts: ti: k3-am64: Enable Mailbox nodes at the board level

Mailbox nodes defined in the top-level AM64x SoC dtsi files are incomplete
and may not be functional unless they are extended with a

arm64: dts: ti: k3-am64: Enable Mailbox nodes at the board level

Mailbox nodes defined in the top-level AM64x SoC dtsi files are incomplete
and may not be functional unless they are extended with a chosen interrupt
and connection to a remote processor.

As the remote processors depend on memory nodes which are only known at
the board integration level, these nodes should only be enabled when
provided with the above information.

Disable the Mailbox nodes in the dtsi files and only enable the ones that
are actually used on a given board.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Davis <afd@ti.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230515172137.474626-4-afd@ti.com
Signed-off-by: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>

show more ...


Revision tags: v6.1.28, v6.1.27, v6.1.26, v6.3, v6.1.25, v6.1.24, v6.1.23, v6.1.22, v6.1.21, v6.1.20, v6.1.19, v6.1.18, v6.1.17, v6.1.16, v6.1.15, v6.1.14, v6.1.13, v6.2, v6.1.12, v6.1.11, v6.1.10, v6.1.9, v6.1.8, v6.1.7, v6.1.6, v6.1.5, v6.0.19, v6.0.18, v6.1.4
# c48ac0ef 04-Jan-2023 Wadim Egorov <w.egorov@phytec.de>

arm64: dts: ti: Add support for phyBOARD-Electra-AM642

Add basic support for phyCORE-AM64x SoM & phyBOARD-Electra-AM642 CB.

The phyCORE-AM64x [1] is a SoM (System on Module) featuring TI's AM64x So

arm64: dts: ti: Add support for phyBOARD-Electra-AM642

Add basic support for phyCORE-AM64x SoM & phyBOARD-Electra-AM642 CB.

The phyCORE-AM64x [1] is a SoM (System on Module) featuring TI's AM64x SoC.
It can be used in combination with different carrier boards.
This module can come with different sizes and models for
DDR, eMMC, SPI NOR Flash and various SoCs from the AM64x family.

A development Kit, called phyBOARD-Electra [2] is used as a carrier board
reference design around the AM64x SoM.

Supported features:
* Debug UART
* Heartbeat LED
* GPIO buttons & LEDs
* SPI NOR flash
* eMMC
* CAN
* Ethernet
* Micro SD card
* I2C EEPROM
* I2C RTC
* I2C LED Dimmer
* USB

For more details, see:

[1] Product page SoM: https://www.phytec.com/product/phycore-am64x
[2] Product page CB: https://www.phytec.com/product/phyboard-am64x

Signed-off-by: Wadim Egorov <w.egorov@phytec.de>
Reviewed-by: Ravi Gunasekaran <r-gunasekaran@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230104162927.1215033-2-w.egorov@phytec.de

show more ...