| b4b2115d | 15-Aug-2024 |
Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@samsung.com> |
rust: kbuild: fix export of bss symbols
[ Upstream commit b8673d56935c32a4e0a1a0b40951fdd313dbf340 ]
Symbols in the bss segment are not currently exported. This is a problem
for Rust modules that l
rust: kbuild: fix export of bss symbols
[ Upstream commit b8673d56935c32a4e0a1a0b40951fdd313dbf340 ]
Symbols in the bss segment are not currently exported. This is a problem
for Rust modules that link against statics, that are resident in the kernel
image. Thus export symbols in the bss segment.
Fixes: 2f7ab1267dc9 ("Kbuild: add Rust support")
Signed-off-by: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com>
Tested-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240815074519.2684107-2-nmi@metaspace.dk
[ Reworded slightly. - Miguel ]
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
show more ...
|
| f9275893 | 28-Aug-2024 |
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> |
rust: macros: provide correct provenance when constructing THIS_MODULE
commit a5a3c952e82c1ada12bf8c55b73af26f1a454bd2 upstream.
Currently while defining `THIS_MODULE` symbol in `module!()`, the
po
rust: macros: provide correct provenance when constructing THIS_MODULE
commit a5a3c952e82c1ada12bf8c55b73af26f1a454bd2 upstream.
Currently while defining `THIS_MODULE` symbol in `module!()`, the
pointer used to construct `ThisModule` is derived from an immutable
reference of `__this_module`, which means the pointer doesn't have
the provenance for writing, and that means any write to that pointer
is UB regardless of data races or not. However, the usage of
`THIS_MODULE` includes passing this pointer to functions that may write
to it (probably in unsafe code), and this will create soundness issues.
One way to fix this is using `addr_of_mut!()` but that requires the
unstable feature "const_mut_refs". So instead of `addr_of_mut()!`,
an extern static `Opaque` is used here: since `Opaque<T>` is transparent
to `T`, an extern static `Opaque` will just wrap the C symbol (defined
in a C compile unit) in an `Opaque`, which provides a pointer with
writable provenance via `Opaque::get()`. This fix the potential UBs
because of pointer provenance unmatched.
Reported-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Trevor Gross <tmgross@umich.edu>
Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me>
Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net>
Closes: https://rust-for-linux.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/x/topic/x/near/465412664
Fixes: 1fbde52bde73 ("rust: add `macros` crate")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.6.x: be2ca1e03965: ("rust: types: Make Opaque::get const")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240828180129.4046355-1-boqun.feng@gmail.com
[ Fixed two typos, reworded title. - Miguel ]
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
show more ...
|
| 00d2715a | 28-Mar-2024 |
Wedson Almeida Filho <walmeida@microsoft.com> |
rust: kernel: require `Send` for `Module` implementations
[ Upstream commit 323617f649c0966ad5e741e47e27e06d3a680d8f ]
The thread that calls the module initialisation code when a module is
loaded i
rust: kernel: require `Send` for `Module` implementations
[ Upstream commit 323617f649c0966ad5e741e47e27e06d3a680d8f ]
The thread that calls the module initialisation code when a module is
loaded is not guaranteed [in fact, it is unlikely] to be the same one
that calls the module cleanup code on module unload, therefore, `Module`
implementations must be `Send` to account for them moving from one
thread to another implicitly.
Signed-off-by: Wedson Almeida Filho <walmeida@microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.8.x: df70d04d5697: rust: phy: implement `Send` for `Registration`
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 247b365dc8dc ("rust: add `kernel` crate")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240328195457.225001-3-wedsonaf@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
show more ...
|
| a4dec33d | 01-Apr-2024 |
Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> |
rust: macros: fix soundness issue in `module!` macro
[ Upstream commit 7044dcff8301b29269016ebd17df27c4736140d2 ]
The `module!` macro creates glue code that are called by C to initialize
the Rust m
rust: macros: fix soundness issue in `module!` macro
[ Upstream commit 7044dcff8301b29269016ebd17df27c4736140d2 ]
The `module!` macro creates glue code that are called by C to initialize
the Rust modules using the `Module::init` function. Part of this glue
code are the local functions `__init` and `__exit` that are used to
initialize/destroy the Rust module.
These functions are safe and also visible to the Rust mod in which the
`module!` macro is invoked. This means that they can be called by other
safe Rust code. But since they contain `unsafe` blocks that rely on only
being called at the right time, this is a soundness issue.
Wrap these generated functions inside of two private modules, this
guarantees that the public functions cannot be called from the outside.
Make the safe functions `unsafe` and add SAFETY comments.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reported-by: Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com>
Closes: https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/linux/issues/629
Fixes: 1fbde52bde73 ("rust: add `macros` crate")
Signed-off-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me>
Reviewed-by: Wedson Almeida Filho <walmeida@microsoft.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240401185222.12015-1-benno.lossin@proton.me
[ Moved `THIS_MODULE` out of the private-in-private modules since it
should remain public, as Dirk Behme noticed [1]. Capitalized comments,
avoided newline in non-list SAFETY comments and reworded to add
Reported-by and newline. ]
Link: https://rust-for-linux.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/291565-Help/topic/x/near/433512583 [1]
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
show more ...
|
| ece94c74 | 19-Apr-2024 |
Aswin Unnikrishnan <aswinunni01@gmail.com> |
rust: remove `params` from `module` macro example
commit 19843452dca40e28d6d3f4793d998b681d505c7f upstream.
Remove argument `params` from the `module` macro example, because the
macro does not curr
rust: remove `params` from `module` macro example
commit 19843452dca40e28d6d3f4793d998b681d505c7f upstream.
Remove argument `params` from the `module` macro example, because the
macro does not currently support module parameters since it was not sent
with the initial merge.
Signed-off-by: Aswin Unnikrishnan <aswinunni01@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 1fbde52bde73 ("rust: add `macros` crate")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240419215015.157258-1-aswinunni01@gmail.com
[ Reworded slightly. ]
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
show more ...
|
| 2eed4381 | 22-Apr-2024 |
Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org> |
kbuild: rust: remove unneeded `@rustc_cfg` to avoid ICE
commit 50cfe93b01475ba36878b65d35d812e1bb48ac71 upstream.
When KUnit tests are enabled, under very big kernel configurations
(e.g. `allyescon
kbuild: rust: remove unneeded `@rustc_cfg` to avoid ICE
commit 50cfe93b01475ba36878b65d35d812e1bb48ac71 upstream.
When KUnit tests are enabled, under very big kernel configurations
(e.g. `allyesconfig`), we can trigger a `rustdoc` ICE [1]:
RUSTDOC TK rust/kernel/lib.rs
error: the compiler unexpectedly panicked. this is a bug.
The reason is that this build step has a duplicated `@rustc_cfg` argument,
which contains the kernel configuration, and thus a lot of arguments. The
factor 2 happens to be enough to reach the ICE.
Thus remove the unneeded `@rustc_cfg`. By doing so, we clean up the
command and workaround the ICE.
The ICE has been fixed in the upcoming Rust 1.79 [2].
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: a66d733da801 ("rust: support running Rust documentation tests as KUnit ones")
Link: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/122722 [1]
Link: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/122840 [2]
Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240422091215.526688-1-ojeda@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
show more ...
|
| 73596f5a | 05-Oct-2023 |
Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org> |
rust: upgrade to Rust 1.73.0
commit e08ff622c91af997cb89bc47e90a1a383e938bd0 upstream.
This is the next upgrade to the Rust toolchain, from 1.72.1 to 1.73.0
(i.e. the latest) [1].
See the upgrade
rust: upgrade to Rust 1.73.0
commit e08ff622c91af997cb89bc47e90a1a383e938bd0 upstream.
This is the next upgrade to the Rust toolchain, from 1.72.1 to 1.73.0
(i.e. the latest) [1].
See the upgrade policy [2] and the comments on the first upgrade in
commit 3ed03f4da06e ("rust: upgrade to Rust 1.68.2").
# Unstable features
No unstable features (that we use) were stabilized.
Therefore, the only unstable feature allowed to be used outside
the `kernel` crate is still `new_uninit`, though other code to be
upstreamed may increase the list.
Please see [3] for details.
# Required changes
For the upgrade, the following changes are required:
- Allow `internal_features` for `feature(compiler_builtins)` since
now Rust warns about using internal compiler and standard library
features (similar to how it also warns about incomplete ones) [4].
- A cleanup for a documentation link thanks to a new `rustdoc` lint.
See previous commits for details.
- A need to make an intra-doc link to a macro explicit, due to a
change in behavior in `rustdoc`. See previous commits for details.
# `alloc` upgrade and reviewing
The vast majority of changes are due to our `alloc` fork being upgraded
at once.
There are two kinds of changes to be aware of: the ones coming from
upstream, which we should follow as closely as possible, and the updates
needed in our added fallible APIs to keep them matching the newer
infallible APIs coming from upstream.
Instead of taking a look at the diff of this patch, an alternative
approach is reviewing a diff of the changes between upstream `alloc` and
the kernel's. This allows to easily inspect the kernel additions only,
especially to check if the fallible methods we already have still match
the infallible ones in the new version coming from upstream.
Another approach is reviewing the changes introduced in the additions in
the kernel fork between the two versions. This is useful to spot
potentially unintended changes to our additions.
To apply these approaches, one may follow steps similar to the following
to generate a pair of patches that show the differences between upstream
Rust and the kernel (for the subset of `alloc` we use) before and after
applying this patch:
# Get the difference with respect to the old version.
git -C rust checkout $(linux/scripts/min-tool-version.sh rustc)
git -C linux ls-tree -r --name-only HEAD -- rust/alloc |
cut -d/ -f3- |
grep -Fv README.md |
xargs -IPATH cp rust/library/alloc/src/PATH linux/rust/alloc/PATH
git -C linux diff --patch-with-stat --summary -R > old.patch
git -C linux restore rust/alloc
# Apply this patch.
git -C linux am rust-upgrade.patch
# Get the difference with respect to the new version.
git -C rust checkout $(linux/scripts/min-tool-version.sh rustc)
git -C linux ls-tree -r --name-only HEAD -- rust/alloc |
cut -d/ -f3- |
grep -Fv README.md |
xargs -IPATH cp rust/library/alloc/src/PATH linux/rust/alloc/PATH
git -C linux diff --patch-with-stat --summary -R > new.patch
git -C linux restore rust/alloc
Now one may check the `new.patch` to take a look at the additions (first
approach) or at the difference between those two patches (second
approach). For the latter, a side-by-side tool is recommended.
Link: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/stable/RELEASES.md#version-1730-2023-10-05 [1]
Link: https://rust-for-linux.com/rust-version-policy [2]
Link: https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/linux/issues/2 [3]
Link: https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/596 [4]
Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Vincenzo Palazzo <vincenzopalazzodev@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231005210556.466856-4-ojeda@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
show more ...
|
| aacae446 | 05-Oct-2023 |
Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org> |
rust: print: use explicit link in documentation
commit a53d8cdd5a0aec75ae32badc2d8995c59ea6e3f0 upstream.
The future `rustdoc` in the Rust 1.73.0 upgrade requires an explicit
link for `pr_info!`:
rust: print: use explicit link in documentation
commit a53d8cdd5a0aec75ae32badc2d8995c59ea6e3f0 upstream.
The future `rustdoc` in the Rust 1.73.0 upgrade requires an explicit
link for `pr_info!`:
error: unresolved link to `pr_info`
--> rust/kernel/print.rs:395:63
|
395 | /// Use only when continuing a previous `pr_*!` macro (e.g. [`pr_info!`]).
| ^^^^^^^^ no item named `pr_info` in scope
|
= note: `macro_rules` named `pr_info` exists in this crate, but it is not in scope at this link's location
= note: `-D rustdoc::broken-intra-doc-links` implied by `-D warnings`
Thus do so to avoid a broken link while upgrading.
Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Vincenzo Palazzo <vincenzopalazzodev@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Finn Behrens <me@kloenk.dev>
Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231005210556.466856-3-ojeda@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
show more ...
|
| e8e7a528 | 05-Oct-2023 |
Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org> |
rust: task: remove redundant explicit link
commit c61bcc278b1924da13fd52edbd46b08a518c11ef upstream.
Starting with Rust 1.73.0, `rustdoc` detects redundant explicit
links with its new lint `redunda
rust: task: remove redundant explicit link
commit c61bcc278b1924da13fd52edbd46b08a518c11ef upstream.
Starting with Rust 1.73.0, `rustdoc` detects redundant explicit
links with its new lint `redundant_explicit_links` [1]:
error: redundant explicit link target
--> rust/kernel/task.rs:85:21
|
85 | /// [`current`](crate::current) macro because it is safe.
| --------- ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ explicit target is redundant
| |
| because label contains path that resolves to same destination
|
= note: when a link's destination is not specified,
the label is used to resolve intra-doc links
= note: `-D rustdoc::redundant-explicit-links` implied by `-D warnings`
help: remove explicit link target
|
85 | /// [`current`] macro because it is safe.
In order to avoid the warning in the compiler upgrade commit,
make it an intra-doc link as the tool suggests.
Link: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/113167 [1]
Reviewed-by: Finn Behrens <me@kloenk.dev>
Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Vincenzo Palazzo <vincenzopalazzodev@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231005210556.466856-2-ojeda@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
show more ...
|
| 9b33bb25 | 23-Aug-2023 |
Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org> |
rust: upgrade to Rust 1.72.1
commit ae6df65dabc3f8bd89663d96203963323e266d90 upstream.
This is the third upgrade to the Rust toolchain, from 1.71.1 to 1.72.1
(i.e. the latest) [1].
See the upgrade
rust: upgrade to Rust 1.72.1
commit ae6df65dabc3f8bd89663d96203963323e266d90 upstream.
This is the third upgrade to the Rust toolchain, from 1.71.1 to 1.72.1
(i.e. the latest) [1].
See the upgrade policy [2] and the comments on the first upgrade in
commit 3ed03f4da06e ("rust: upgrade to Rust 1.68.2").
# Unstable features
No unstable features (that we use) were stabilized.
Therefore, the only unstable feature allowed to be used outside
the `kernel` crate is still `new_uninit`, though other code to be
upstreamed may increase the list.
Please see [3] for details.
# Other improvements
Previously, the compiler could incorrectly generate a `.eh_frame`
section under `-Cpanic=abort`. We were hitting this bug when debug
assertions were enabled (`CONFIG_RUST_DEBUG_ASSERTIONS=y`) [4]:
LD .tmp_vmlinux.kallsyms1
ld.lld: error: <internal>:(.eh_frame) is being placed in '.eh_frame'
Gary fixed the issue in Rust 1.72.0 [5].
# Required changes
For the upgrade, the following changes are required:
- A call to `Box::from_raw` in `rust/kernel/sync/arc.rs` now requires
an explicit `drop()` call. See previous patch for details.
# `alloc` upgrade and reviewing
The vast majority of changes are due to our `alloc` fork being upgraded
at once.
There are two kinds of changes to be aware of: the ones coming from
upstream, which we should follow as closely as possible, and the updates
needed in our added fallible APIs to keep them matching the newer
infallible APIs coming from upstream.
Instead of taking a look at the diff of this patch, an alternative
approach is reviewing a diff of the changes between upstream `alloc` and
the kernel's. This allows to easily inspect the kernel additions only,
especially to check if the fallible methods we already have still match
the infallible ones in the new version coming from upstream.
Another approach is reviewing the changes introduced in the additions in
the kernel fork between the two versions. This is useful to spot
potentially unintended changes to our additions.
To apply these approaches, one may follow steps similar to the following
to generate a pair of patches that show the differences between upstream
Rust and the kernel (for the subset of `alloc` we use) before and after
applying this patch:
# Get the difference with respect to the old version.
git -C rust checkout $(linux/scripts/min-tool-version.sh rustc)
git -C linux ls-tree -r --name-only HEAD -- rust/alloc |
cut -d/ -f3- |
grep -Fv README.md |
xargs -IPATH cp rust/library/alloc/src/PATH linux/rust/alloc/PATH
git -C linux diff --patch-with-stat --summary -R > old.patch
git -C linux restore rust/alloc
# Apply this patch.
git -C linux am rust-upgrade.patch
# Get the difference with respect to the new version.
git -C rust checkout $(linux/scripts/min-tool-version.sh rustc)
git -C linux ls-tree -r --name-only HEAD -- rust/alloc |
cut -d/ -f3- |
grep -Fv README.md |
xargs -IPATH cp rust/library/alloc/src/PATH linux/rust/alloc/PATH
git -C linux diff --patch-with-stat --summary -R > new.patch
git -C linux restore rust/alloc
Now one may check the `new.patch` to take a look at the additions (first
approach) or at the difference between those two patches (second
approach). For the latter, a side-by-side tool is recommended.
Link: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/stable/RELEASES.md#version-1721-2023-09-19 [1]
Link: https://rust-for-linux.com/rust-version-policy [2]
Link: https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/linux/issues/2 [3]
Closes: https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/linux/issues/1012 [4]
Link: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/112403 [5]
Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net>
Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230823160244.188033-3-ojeda@kernel.org
[ Used 1.72.1 instead of .0 (no changes in `alloc`) and reworded
to mention that we hit the `.eh_frame` bug under debug assertions. ]
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
show more ...
|
| cfd96726 | 18-Oct-2023 |
Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org> |
rust: docs: fix logo replacement
The static files placement by `rustdoc` changed in Rust 1.67.0 [1],
but the custom code we have to replace the logo in the generated
HTML files did not get updated.
rust: docs: fix logo replacement
The static files placement by `rustdoc` changed in Rust 1.67.0 [1],
but the custom code we have to replace the logo in the generated
HTML files did not get updated.
Thus update it to have the Linux logo again in the output.
Hopefully `rustdoc` will eventually support a custom logo from
a local file [2], so that we do not need to maintain this hack
on our side.
Link: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/101702 [1]
Link: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3226 [2]
Fixes: 3ed03f4da06e ("rust: upgrade to Rust 1.68.2")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Tested-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@samsung.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231018155527.1015059-1-ojeda@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
show more ...
|
| 344b6c0a | 15-Aug-2023 |
Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@canonical.com> |
rust: fix bindgen build error with fstrict-flex-arrays
Commit df8fc4e934c1 ("kbuild: Enable -fstrict-flex-arrays=3") enabled
'-fstrict-flex-arrays=3' globally, but bindgen does not recognized this
c
rust: fix bindgen build error with fstrict-flex-arrays
Commit df8fc4e934c1 ("kbuild: Enable -fstrict-flex-arrays=3") enabled
'-fstrict-flex-arrays=3' globally, but bindgen does not recognized this
compiler option, triggering the following build error:
error: unknown argument: '-fstrict-flex-arrays=3', err: true
[ Miguel: Commit df8fc4e934c1 ("kbuild: Enable -fstrict-flex-arrays=3")
did it so only conditionally (i.e. only if the C compiler supports
it). This explains what Andrea was seeing: he was compiling with a
modern enough GCC, which enables the option, but with an old enough
Clang. Andrea confirmed this was the case: he was using Clang 14 with
GCC 13; and that Clang 15 worked for him.
While it is possible to construct code (see mailing list for an
example I came up with) where this could break, it is fairly
contrived, and anyway GCC-built kernels with Rust enabled should
only be used for experimentation until we get support for
`rustc_codegen_gcc` and/or GCC Rust. So let's add this for the
time being in case it helps somebody. ]
Add '-fstrict-flex-arrays' to the list of cflags that should be ignored
by bindgen.
Fixes: df8fc4e934c1 ("kbuild: Enable -fstrict-flex-arrays=3")
Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@canonical.com>
Tested-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230815065346.131387-1-andrea.righi@canonical.com
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
show more ...
|
| 2a7e0a52 | 06-Sep-2023 |
Manmohan Shukla <manmshuk@gmail.com> |
rust: error: Markdown style nit
This patch fixes a trivial markdown style nit in the `SAFETY` comment.
Signed-off-by: Manmohan Shukla <manmshuk@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.
rust: error: Markdown style nit
This patch fixes a trivial markdown style nit in the `SAFETY` comment.
Signed-off-by: Manmohan Shukla <manmshuk@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Jianguo Bao <roidinev@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Vincenzo Palazzo <vincenzopalazzodev@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Finn Behrens <me@kloenk.dev>
Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@samsung.com>
Fixes: c7e20faa5fca ("rust: error: Add Error::to_ptr()")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230906204857.85619-1-manmshuk@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
show more ...
|
| 4af84c6a | 14-Aug-2023 |
Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> |
rust: init: update expanded macro explanation
The previous patches changed the internals of the macros resulting in
the example expanded code being outdated. This patch updates the example
and only
rust: init: update expanded macro explanation
The previous patches changed the internals of the macros resulting in
the example expanded code being outdated. This patch updates the example
and only changes documentation.
Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230814084602.25699-14-benno.lossin@proton.me
Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
show more ...
|
| 7f8977a7 | 14-Aug-2023 |
Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> |
rust: init: add `{pin_}chain` functions to `{Pin}Init<T, E>`
The `{pin_}chain` functions extend an initializer: it not only
initializes the value, but also executes a closure taking a reference to
t
rust: init: add `{pin_}chain` functions to `{Pin}Init<T, E>`
The `{pin_}chain` functions extend an initializer: it not only
initializes the value, but also executes a closure taking a reference to
the initialized value. This allows to do something with a value directly
after initialization.
Suggested-by: Asahi Lina <lina@asahilina.net>
Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me>
Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230814084602.25699-13-benno.lossin@proton.me
[ Cleaned a few trivial nits. ]
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
show more ...
|
| 1a8076ac | 14-Aug-2023 |
Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> |
rust: init: make `PinInit<T, E>` a supertrait of `Init<T, E>`
Remove the blanket implementation of `PinInit<T, E> for I where I:
Init<T, E>`. This blanket implementation prevented custom types that
rust: init: make `PinInit<T, E>` a supertrait of `Init<T, E>`
Remove the blanket implementation of `PinInit<T, E> for I where I:
Init<T, E>`. This blanket implementation prevented custom types that
implement `PinInit`.
Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net>
Signed-off-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230814084602.25699-12-benno.lossin@proton.me
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
show more ...
|
| 2e704f18 | 14-Aug-2023 |
Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me> |
rust: init: implement `Zeroable` for `UnsafeCell<T>` and `Opaque<T>`
`UnsafeCell<T>` and `T` have the same layout so if `T` is `Zeroable`
then so should `UnsafeCell<T>` be. This allows using the der
rust: init: implement `Zeroable` for `UnsafeCell<T>` and `Opaque<T>`
`UnsafeCell<T>` and `T` have the same layout so if `T` is `Zeroable`
then so should `UnsafeCell<T>` be. This allows using the derive macro
for `Zeroable` on types that contain an `UnsafeCell<T>`.
Since `Opaque<T>` contains a `MaybeUninit<T>`, all bytes zero is a valid
bit pattern for that type.
Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net>
Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230814084602.25699-11-benno.lossin@proton.me
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
show more ...
|