tcp_bpf: properly release resources on error paths

In the blamed commit below, I completely forgot to release the acquired
resources before erroring out in the TCP BPF code, as reported by Dan.

Add

tcp_bpf: properly release resources on error paths

In the blamed commit below, I completely forgot to release the acquired
resources before erroring out in the TCP BPF code, as reported by Dan.

Address the issues by replacing the bogus return with a jump to the
relevant cleanup code.

Fixes: 419ce133ab92 ("tcp: allow again tcp_disconnect() when threads are waiting")
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Reviewed-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/8f99194c698bcef12666f0a9a999c58f8b1cb52c.1697557782.git.pabeni@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>

show more ...

tcp: allow again tcp_disconnect() when threads are waiting

As reported by Tom, .NET and applications build on top of it rely
on connect(AF_UNSPEC) to async cancel pending I/O operations on TCP
socke

tcp: allow again tcp_disconnect() when threads are waiting

As reported by Tom, .NET and applications build on top of it rely
on connect(AF_UNSPEC) to async cancel pending I/O operations on TCP
socket.

The blamed commit below caused a regression, as such cancellation
can now fail.

As suggested by Eric, this change addresses the problem explicitly
causing blocking I/O operation to terminate immediately (with an error)
when a concurrent disconnect() is executed.

Instead of tracking the number of threads blocked on a given socket,
track the number of disconnect() issued on such socket. If such counter
changes after a blocking operation releasing and re-acquiring the socket
lock, error out the current operation.

Fixes: 4faeee0cf8a5 ("tcp: deny tcp_disconnect() when threads are waiting")
Reported-by: Tom Deseyn <tdeseyn@redhat.com>
Closes: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1886305
Suggested-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/f3b95e47e3dbed840960548aebaa8d954372db41.1697008693.git.pabeni@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>

show more ...

bpf, sockmap: Do not inc copied_seq when PEEK flag set

When data is peek'd off the receive queue we shouldn't considered it
copied from tcp_sock side. When we increment copied_seq this will confuse

bpf, sockmap: Do not inc copied_seq when PEEK flag set

When data is peek'd off the receive queue we shouldn't considered it
copied from tcp_sock side. When we increment copied_seq this will confuse
tcp_data_ready() because copied_seq can be arbitrarily increased. From
application side it results in poll() operations not waking up when
expected.

Notice tcp stack without BPF recvmsg programs also does not increment
copied_seq.

We broke this when we moved copied_seq into recvmsg to only update when
actual copy was happening. But, it wasn't working correctly either before
because the tcp_data_ready() tried to use the copied_seq value to see
if data was read by user yet. See fixes tags.

Fixes: e5c6de5fa0258 ("bpf, sockmap: Incorrectly handling copied_seq")
Fixes: 04919bed948dc ("tcp: Introduce tcp_read_skb()")
Signed-off-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Reviewed-by: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230926035300.135096-3-john.fastabend@gmail.com

show more ...

sock: Remove ->sendpage*() in favour of sendmsg(MSG_SPLICE_PAGES)

Remove ->sendpage() and ->sendpage_locked(). sendmsg() with
MSG_SPLICE_PAGES should be used instead. This allows multiple pages an

sock: Remove ->sendpage*() in favour of sendmsg(MSG_SPLICE_PAGES)

Remove ->sendpage() and ->sendpage_locked(). sendmsg() with
MSG_SPLICE_PAGES should be used instead. This allows multiple pages and
multipage folios to be passed through.

Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de> # for net/can
cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
cc: mptcp@lists.linux.dev
cc: rds-devel@oss.oracle.com
cc: tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
cc: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230623225513.2732256-16-dhowells@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>

show more ...

tcp_bpf, smc, tls, espintcp, siw: Reduce MSG_SENDPAGE_NOTLAST usage

As MSG_SENDPAGE_NOTLAST is being phased out along with sendpage(), don't
use it further in than the sendpage methods, but rather t

tcp_bpf, smc, tls, espintcp, siw: Reduce MSG_SENDPAGE_NOTLAST usage

As MSG_SENDPAGE_NOTLAST is being phased out along with sendpage(), don't
use it further in than the sendpage methods, but rather translate it to
MSG_MORE and use that instead.

Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
cc: Bernard Metzler <bmt@zurich.ibm.com>
cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
cc: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
cc: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
cc: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>
cc: David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>
cc: Karsten Graul <kgraul@linux.ibm.com>
cc: Wenjia Zhang <wenjia@linux.ibm.com>
cc: Jan Karcher <jaka@linux.ibm.com>
cc: "D. Wythe" <alibuda@linux.alibaba.com>
cc: Tony Lu <tonylu@linux.alibaba.com>
cc: Wen Gu <guwen@linux.alibaba.com>
cc: Boris Pismenny <borisp@nvidia.com>
cc: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230623225513.2732256-2-dhowells@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>

show more ...

tcp_bpf: Make tcp_bpf_sendpage() go through tcp_bpf_sendmsg(MSG_SPLICE_PAGES)

Make tcp_bpf_sendpage() a wrapper around tcp_bpf_sendmsg(MSG_SPLICE_PAGES)
rather than a loop calling tcp_sendpage(). s

tcp_bpf: Make tcp_bpf_sendpage() go through tcp_bpf_sendmsg(MSG_SPLICE_PAGES)

Make tcp_bpf_sendpage() a wrapper around tcp_bpf_sendmsg(MSG_SPLICE_PAGES)
rather than a loop calling tcp_sendpage(). sendpage() will be removed in
the future.

Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
cc: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>
cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>

show more ...

tcp_bpf: Inline do_tcp_sendpages as it's now a wrapper around tcp_sendmsg

do_tcp_sendpages() is now just a small wrapper around tcp_sendmsg_locked(),
so inline it. This is part of replacing ->sendp

tcp_bpf: Inline do_tcp_sendpages as it's now a wrapper around tcp_sendmsg

do_tcp_sendpages() is now just a small wrapper around tcp_sendmsg_locked(),
so inline it. This is part of replacing ->sendpage() with a call to
sendmsg() with MSG_SPLICE_PAGES set.

Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
cc: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>
cc: David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>
cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>

show more ...

bpf, sockmap: Incorrectly handling copied_seq

The read_skb() logic is incrementing the tcp->copied_seq which is used for
among other things calculating how many outstanding bytes can be read by
the

bpf, sockmap: Incorrectly handling copied_seq

The read_skb() logic is incrementing the tcp->copied_seq which is used for
among other things calculating how many outstanding bytes can be read by
the application. This results in application errors, if the application
does an ioctl(FIONREAD) we return zero because this is calculated from
the copied_seq value.

To fix this we move tcp->copied_seq accounting into the recv handler so
that we update these when the recvmsg() hook is called and data is in
fact copied into user buffers. This gives an accurate FIONREAD value
as expected and improves ACK handling. Before we were calling the
tcp_rcv_space_adjust() which would update 'number of bytes copied to
user in last RTT' which is wrong for programs returning SK_PASS. The
bytes are only copied to the user when recvmsg is handled.

Doing the fix for recvmsg is straightforward, but fixing redirect and
SK_DROP pkts is a bit tricker. Build a tcp_psock_eat() helper and then
call this from skmsg handlers. This fixes another issue where a broken
socket with a BPF program doing a resubmit could hang the receiver. This
happened because although read_skb() consumed the skb through sock_drop()
it did not update the copied_seq. Now if a single reccv socket is
redirecting to many sockets (for example for lb) the receiver sk will be
hung even though we might expect it to continue. The hang comes from
not updating the copied_seq numbers and memory pressure resulting from
that.

We have a slight layer problem of calling tcp_eat_skb even if its not
a TCP socket. To fix we could refactor and create per type receiver
handlers. I decided this is more work than we want in the fix and we
already have some small tweaks depending on caller that use the
helper skb_bpf_strparser(). So we extend that a bit and always set
the strparser bit when it is in use and then we can gate the
seq_copied updates on this.

Fixes: 04919bed948dc ("tcp: Introduce tcp_read_skb()")
Signed-off-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Reviewed-by: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230523025618.113937-9-john.fastabend@gmail.com

show more ...

bpf, sockmap: TCP data stall on recv before accept

A common mechanism to put a TCP socket into the sockmap is to hook the
BPF_SOCK_OPS_{ACTIVE_PASSIVE}_ESTABLISHED_CB event with a BPF program
that c

bpf, sockmap: TCP data stall on recv before accept

A common mechanism to put a TCP socket into the sockmap is to hook the
BPF_SOCK_OPS_{ACTIVE_PASSIVE}_ESTABLISHED_CB event with a BPF program
that can map the socket info to the correct BPF verdict parser. When
the user adds the socket to the map the psock is created and the new
ops are assigned to ensure the verdict program will 'see' the sk_buffs
as they arrive.

Part of this process hooks the sk_data_ready op with a BPF specific
handler to wake up the BPF verdict program when data is ready to read.
The logic is simple enough (posted here for easy reading)

static void sk_psock_verdict_data_ready(struct sock *sk)
{
struct socket *sock = sk->sk_socket;

if (unlikely(!sock || !sock->ops || !sock->ops->read_skb))
return;
sock->ops->read_skb(sk, sk_psock_verdict_recv);
}

The oversight here is sk->sk_socket is not assigned until the application
accepts() the new socket. However, its entirely ok for the peer application
to do a connect() followed immediately by sends. The socket on the receiver
is sitting on the backlog queue of the listening socket until its accepted
and the data is queued up. If the peer never accepts the socket or is slow
it will eventually hit data limits and rate limit the session. But,
important for BPF sockmap hooks when this data is received TCP stack does
the sk_data_ready() call but the read_skb() for this data is never called
because sk_socket is missing. The data sits on the sk_receive_queue.

Then once the socket is accepted if we never receive more data from the
peer there will be no further sk_data_ready calls and all the data
is still on the sk_receive_queue(). Then user calls recvmsg after accept()
and for TCP sockets in sockmap we use the tcp_bpf_recvmsg_parser() handler.
The handler checks for data in the sk_msg ingress queue expecting that
the BPF program has already run from the sk_data_ready hook and enqueued
the data as needed. So we are stuck.

To fix do an unlikely check in recvmsg handler for data on the
sk_receive_queue and if it exists wake up data_ready. We have the sock
locked in both read_skb and recvmsg so should avoid having multiple
runners.

Fixes: 04919bed948dc ("tcp: Introduce tcp_read_skb()")
Signed-off-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Reviewed-by: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230523025618.113937-7-john.fastabend@gmail.com

show more ...

bpf, sockmap: Handle fin correctly

The sockmap code is returning EAGAIN after a FIN packet is received and no
more data is on the receive queue. Correct behavior is to return 0 to the
user and the u

bpf, sockmap: Handle fin correctly

The sockmap code is returning EAGAIN after a FIN packet is received and no
more data is on the receive queue. Correct behavior is to return 0 to the
user and the user can then close the socket. The EAGAIN causes many apps
to retry which masks the problem. Eventually the socket is evicted from
the sockmap because its released from sockmap sock free handling. The
issue creates a delay and can cause some errors on application side.

To fix this check on sk_msg_recvmsg side if length is zero and FIN flag
is set then set return to zero. A selftest will be added to check this
condition.

Fixes: 04919bed948dc ("tcp: Introduce tcp_read_skb()")
Signed-off-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Tested-by: William Findlay <will@isovalent.com>
Reviewed-by: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230523025618.113937-6-john.fastabend@gmail.com

show more ...

net: deal with most data-races in sk_wait_event()

__condition is evaluated twice in sk_wait_event() macro.

First invocation is lockless, and reads can race with writes,
as spotted by syzbot.

BUG:

net: deal with most data-races in sk_wait_event()

__condition is evaluated twice in sk_wait_event() macro.

First invocation is lockless, and reads can race with writes,
as spotted by syzbot.

BUG: KCSAN: data-race in sk_stream_wait_connect / tcp_disconnect

write to 0xffff88812d83d6a0 of 4 bytes by task 9065 on cpu 1:
tcp_disconnect+0x2cd/0xdb0
inet_shutdown+0x19e/0x1f0 net/ipv4/af_inet.c:911
__sys_shutdown_sock net/socket.c:2343 [inline]
__sys_shutdown net/socket.c:2355 [inline]
__do_sys_shutdown net/socket.c:2363 [inline]
__se_sys_shutdown+0xf8/0x140 net/socket.c:2361
__x64_sys_shutdown+0x31/0x40 net/socket.c:2361
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x41/0xc0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd

read to 0xffff88812d83d6a0 of 4 bytes by task 9040 on cpu 0:
sk_stream_wait_connect+0x1de/0x3a0 net/core/stream.c:75
tcp_sendmsg_locked+0x2e4/0x2120 net/ipv4/tcp.c:1266
tcp_sendmsg+0x30/0x50 net/ipv4/tcp.c:1484
inet6_sendmsg+0x63/0x80 net/ipv6/af_inet6.c:651
sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:724 [inline]
sock_sendmsg net/socket.c:747 [inline]
__sys_sendto+0x246/0x300 net/socket.c:2142
__do_sys_sendto net/socket.c:2154 [inline]
__se_sys_sendto net/socket.c:2150 [inline]
__x64_sys_sendto+0x78/0x90 net/socket.c:2150
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x41/0xc0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd

value changed: 0x00000000 -> 0x00000068

Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
Reported-by: syzbot <syzkaller@googlegroups.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

show more ...

bpf, sockmap: Fix an infinite loop error when len is 0 in tcp_bpf_recvmsg_parser()

When the buffer length of the recvmsg system call is 0, we got the
flollowing soft lockup problem:

watchdog: BUG:

bpf, sockmap: Fix an infinite loop error when len is 0 in tcp_bpf_recvmsg_parser()

When the buffer length of the recvmsg system call is 0, we got the
flollowing soft lockup problem:

watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#3 stuck for 27s! [a.out:6149]
CPU: 3 PID: 6149 Comm: a.out Kdump: loaded Not tainted 6.2.0+ #30
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014
RIP: 0010:remove_wait_queue+0xb/0xc0
Code: 5e 41 5f c3 cc cc cc cc 0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 f3 0f 1e fa 0f 1f 44 00 00 41 57 <41> 56 41 55 41 54 55 48 89 fd 53 48 89 f3 4c 8d 6b 18 4c 8d 73 20
RSP: 0018:ffff88811b5978b8 EFLAGS: 00000246
RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff88811a7d3780 RCX: ffffffffb7a4d768
RDX: dffffc0000000000 RSI: ffff88811b597908 RDI: ffff888115408040
RBP: 1ffff110236b2f1b R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffff88811a7d37e7
R10: ffffed10234fa6fc R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff88811179b800
R13: 0000000000000001 R14: ffff88811a7d38a8 R15: ffff88811a7d37e0
FS: 00007f6fb5398740(0000) GS:ffff888237180000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 0000000020000000 CR3: 000000010b6ba002 CR4: 0000000000370ee0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Call Trace:
<TASK>
tcp_msg_wait_data+0x279/0x2f0
tcp_bpf_recvmsg_parser+0x3c6/0x490
inet_recvmsg+0x280/0x290
sock_recvmsg+0xfc/0x120
____sys_recvmsg+0x160/0x3d0
___sys_recvmsg+0xf0/0x180
__sys_recvmsg+0xea/0x1a0
do_syscall_64+0x3f/0x90
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x72/0xdc

The logic in tcp_bpf_recvmsg_parser is as follows:

msg_bytes_ready:
copied = sk_msg_recvmsg(sk, psock, msg, len, flags);
if (!copied) {
wait data;
goto msg_bytes_ready;
}

In this case, "copied" always is 0, the infinite loop occurs.

According to the Linux system call man page, 0 should be returned in this
case. Therefore, in tcp_bpf_recvmsg_parser(), if the length is 0, directly
return. Also modify several other functions with the same problem.

Fixes: 1f5be6b3b063 ("udp: Implement udp_bpf_recvmsg() for sockmap")
Fixes: 9825d866ce0d ("af_unix: Implement unix_dgram_bpf_recvmsg()")
Fixes: c5d2177a72a1 ("bpf, sockmap: Fix race in ingress receive verdict with redirect to self")
Fixes: 604326b41a6f ("bpf, sockmap: convert to generic sk_msg interface")
Signed-off-by: Liu Jian <liujian56@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Cc: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230303080946.1146638-1-liujian56@huawei.com

show more ...

bpf, sockmap: Check for any of tcp_bpf_prots when cloning a listener

A listening socket linked to a sockmap has its sk_prot overridden. It
points to one of the struct proto variants in tcp_bpf_prots

bpf, sockmap: Check for any of tcp_bpf_prots when cloning a listener

A listening socket linked to a sockmap has its sk_prot overridden. It
points to one of the struct proto variants in tcp_bpf_prots. The variant
depends on the socket's family and which sockmap programs are attached.

A child socket cloned from a TCP listener initially inherits their sk_prot.
But before cloning is finished, we restore the child's proto to the
listener's original non-tcp_bpf_prots one. This happens in
tcp_create_openreq_child -> tcp_bpf_clone.

Today, in tcp_bpf_clone we detect if the child's proto should be restored
by checking only for the TCP_BPF_BASE proto variant. This is not
correct. The sk_prot of listening socket linked to a sockmap can point to
to any variant in tcp_bpf_prots.

If the listeners sk_prot happens to be not the TCP_BPF_BASE variant, then
the child socket unintentionally is left if the inherited sk_prot by
tcp_bpf_clone.

This leads to issues like infinite recursion on close [1], because the
child state is otherwise not set up for use with tcp_bpf_prot operations.

Adjust the check in tcp_bpf_clone to detect all of tcp_bpf_prots variants.

Note that it wouldn't be sufficient to check the socket state when
overriding the sk_prot in tcp_bpf_update_proto in order to always use the
TCP_BPF_BASE variant for listening sockets. Since commit
b8b8315e39ff ("bpf, sockmap: Remove unhash handler for BPF sockmap usage")
it is possible for a socket to transition to TCP_LISTEN state while already
linked to a sockmap, e.g. connect() -> insert into map ->
connect(AF_UNSPEC) -> listen().

[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/00000000000073b14905ef2e7401@google.com/

Fixes: e80251555f0b ("tcp_bpf: Don't let child socket inherit parent protocol ops on copy")
Reported-by: syzbot+04c21ed96d861dccc5cd@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230113-sockmap-fix-v2-2-1e0ee7ac2f90@cloudflare.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

show more ...

bpf, sockmap: Fix data loss caused by using apply_bytes on ingress redirect

Use apply_bytes on ingress redirect, when apply_bytes is less than
the length of msg data, some data may be skipped and lo

bpf, sockmap: Fix data loss caused by using apply_bytes on ingress redirect

Use apply_bytes on ingress redirect, when apply_bytes is less than
the length of msg data, some data may be skipped and lost in
bpf_tcp_ingress().

If there is still data in the scatterlist that has not been consumed,
we cannot move the msg iter.

Fixes: 604326b41a6f ("bpf, sockmap: convert to generic sk_msg interface")
Signed-off-by: Pengcheng Yang <yangpc@wangsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/1669718441-2654-4-git-send-email-yangpc@wangsu.com

show more ...

bpf, sockmap: Fix missing BPF_F_INGRESS flag when using apply_bytes

When redirecting, we use sk_msg_to_ingress() to get the BPF_F_INGRESS
flag from the msg->flags. If apply_bytes is used and it is l

bpf, sockmap: Fix missing BPF_F_INGRESS flag when using apply_bytes

When redirecting, we use sk_msg_to_ingress() to get the BPF_F_INGRESS
flag from the msg->flags. If apply_bytes is used and it is larger than
the current data being processed, sk_psock_msg_verdict() will not be
called when sendmsg() is called again. At this time, the msg->flags is 0,
and we lost the BPF_F_INGRESS flag.

So we need to save the BPF_F_INGRESS flag in sk_psock and use it when
redirection.

Fixes: 8934ce2fd081 ("bpf: sockmap redirect ingress support")
Signed-off-by: Pengcheng Yang <yangpc@wangsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/1669718441-2654-3-git-send-email-yangpc@wangsu.com

show more ...

bpf, sockmap: Fix repeated calls to sock_put() when msg has more_data

In tcp_bpf_send_verdict() redirection, the eval variable is assigned to
__SK_REDIRECT after the apply_bytes data is sent, if msg

bpf, sockmap: Fix repeated calls to sock_put() when msg has more_data

In tcp_bpf_send_verdict() redirection, the eval variable is assigned to
__SK_REDIRECT after the apply_bytes data is sent, if msg has more_data,
sock_put() will be called multiple times.

We should reset the eval variable to __SK_NONE every time more_data
starts.

This causes:

IPv4: Attempt to release TCP socket in state 1 00000000b4c925d7
------------[ cut here ]------------
refcount_t: addition on 0; use-after-free.
WARNING: CPU: 5 PID: 4482 at lib/refcount.c:25 refcount_warn_saturate+0x7d/0x110
Modules linked in:
CPU: 5 PID: 4482 Comm: sockhash_bypass Kdump: loaded Not tainted 6.0.0 #1
Hardware name: Red Hat KVM, BIOS 1.11.0-2.el7 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
<TASK>
__tcp_transmit_skb+0xa1b/0xb90
? __alloc_skb+0x8c/0x1a0
? __kmalloc_node_track_caller+0x184/0x320
tcp_write_xmit+0x22a/0x1110
__tcp_push_pending_frames+0x32/0xf0
do_tcp_sendpages+0x62d/0x640
tcp_bpf_push+0xae/0x2c0
tcp_bpf_sendmsg_redir+0x260/0x410
? preempt_count_add+0x70/0xa0
tcp_bpf_send_verdict+0x386/0x4b0
tcp_bpf_sendmsg+0x21b/0x3b0
sock_sendmsg+0x58/0x70
__sys_sendto+0xfa/0x170
? xfd_validate_state+0x1d/0x80
? switch_fpu_return+0x59/0xe0
__x64_sys_sendto+0x24/0x30
do_syscall_64+0x37/0x90
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd

Fixes: cd9733f5d75c ("tcp_bpf: Fix one concurrency problem in the tcp_bpf_send_verdict function")
Signed-off-by: Pengcheng Yang <yangpc@wangsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/1669718441-2654-2-git-send-email-yangpc@wangsu.com

show more ...

bpf, sockmap: Fix the sk->sk_forward_alloc warning of sk_stream_kill_queues

When running `test_sockmap` selftests, the following warning appears:

WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 197 at net/core/stream.c:205

bpf, sockmap: Fix the sk->sk_forward_alloc warning of sk_stream_kill_queues

When running `test_sockmap` selftests, the following warning appears:

WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 197 at net/core/stream.c:205 sk_stream_kill_queues+0xd3/0xf0
Call Trace:
<TASK>
inet_csk_destroy_sock+0x55/0x110
tcp_rcv_state_process+0xd28/0x1380
? tcp_v4_do_rcv+0x77/0x2c0
tcp_v4_do_rcv+0x77/0x2c0
__release_sock+0x106/0x130
__tcp_close+0x1a7/0x4e0
tcp_close+0x20/0x70
inet_release+0x3c/0x80
__sock_release+0x3a/0xb0
sock_close+0x14/0x20
__fput+0xa3/0x260
task_work_run+0x59/0xb0
exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x1b3/0x1c0
syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x19/0x50
do_syscall_64+0x48/0x90
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae

The root case is in commit 84472b436e76 ("bpf, sockmap: Fix more uncharged
while msg has more_data"), where I used msg->sg.size to replace the tosend,
causing breakage:

if (msg->apply_bytes && msg->apply_bytes < tosend)
tosend = psock->apply_bytes;

Fixes: 84472b436e76 ("bpf, sockmap: Fix more uncharged while msg has more_data")
Reported-by: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>
Signed-off-by: Wang Yufen <wangyufen@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/1667266296-8794-1-git-send-email-wangyufen@huawei.com

show more ...

net: remove SOCK_SUPPORT_ZC from sockmap

sockmap replaces ->sk_prot with its own callbacks, we should remove
SOCK_SUPPORT_ZC as the new proto doesn't support msghdr::ubuf_info.

Cc: <stable@vger.ker

net: remove SOCK_SUPPORT_ZC from sockmap

sockmap replaces ->sk_prot with its own callbacks, we should remove
SOCK_SUPPORT_ZC as the new proto doesn't support msghdr::ubuf_info.

Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 6.0
Reported-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Fixes: e993ffe3da4bc ("net: flag sockets supporting msghdr originated zerocopy")
Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>

show more ...

sock: redo the psock vs ULP protection check

Commit 8a59f9d1e3d4 ("sock: Introduce sk->sk_prot->psock_update_sk_prot()")
has moved the inet_csk_has_ulp(sk) check from sk_psock_init() to
the new tcp_

sock: redo the psock vs ULP protection check

Commit 8a59f9d1e3d4 ("sock: Introduce sk->sk_prot->psock_update_sk_prot()")
has moved the inet_csk_has_ulp(sk) check from sk_psock_init() to
the new tcp_bpf_update_proto() function. I'm guessing that this
was done to allow creating psocks for non-inet sockets.

Unfortunately the destruction path for psock includes the ULP
unwind, so we need to fail the sk_psock_init() itself.
Otherwise if ULP is already present we'll notice that later,
and call tcp_update_ulp() with the sk_proto of the ULP
itself, which will most likely result in the ULP looping
its callbacks.

Fixes: 8a59f9d1e3d4 ("sock: Introduce sk->sk_prot->psock_update_sk_prot()")
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>
Tested-by: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220620191353.1184629-2-kuba@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>

show more ...

bpf, sockmap: Fix sk->sk_forward_alloc warn_on in sk_stream_kill_queues

During TCP sockmap redirect pressure test, the following warning is triggered:

WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 2145 at net/core/stream.c

bpf, sockmap: Fix sk->sk_forward_alloc warn_on in sk_stream_kill_queues

During TCP sockmap redirect pressure test, the following warning is triggered:

WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 2145 at net/core/stream.c:205 sk_stream_kill_queues+0xbc/0xd0
CPU: 3 PID: 2145 Comm: iperf Kdump: loaded Tainted: G W 5.10.0+ #9
Call Trace:
inet_csk_destroy_sock+0x55/0x110
inet_csk_listen_stop+0xbb/0x380
tcp_close+0x41b/0x480
inet_release+0x42/0x80
__sock_release+0x3d/0xa0
sock_close+0x11/0x20
__fput+0x9d/0x240
task_work_run+0x62/0x90
exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x110/0x120
syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x27/0x190
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

The reason we observed is that:

When the listener is closing, a connection may have completed the three-way
handshake but not accepted, and the client has sent some packets. The child
sks in accept queue release by inet_child_forget()->inet_csk_destroy_sock(),
but psocks of child sks have not released.

To fix, add sock_map_destroy to release psocks.

Signed-off-by: Wang Yufen <wangyufen@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220524075311.649153-1-wangyufen@huawei.com

show more ...

net: remove noblock parameter from recvmsg() entities

The internal recvmsg() functions have two parameters 'flags' and 'noblock'
that were merged inside skb_recv_datagram(). As a follow up patch to

net: remove noblock parameter from recvmsg() entities

The internal recvmsg() functions have two parameters 'flags' and 'noblock'
that were merged inside skb_recv_datagram(). As a follow up patch to commit
f4b41f062c42 ("net: remove noblock parameter from skb_recv_datagram()")
this patch removes the separate 'noblock' parameter for recvmsg().

Analogue to the referenced patch for skb_recv_datagram() the 'flags' and
'noblock' parameters are unnecessarily split up with e.g.

err = sk->sk_prot->recvmsg(sk, msg, size, flags & MSG_DONTWAIT,
flags & ~MSG_DONTWAIT, &addr_len);

or in

err = INDIRECT_CALL_2(sk->sk_prot->recvmsg, tcp_recvmsg, udp_recvmsg,
sk, msg, size, flags & MSG_DONTWAIT,
flags & ~MSG_DONTWAIT, &addr_len);

instead of simply using only flags all the time and check for MSG_DONTWAIT
where needed (to preserve for the formerly separated no(n)block condition).

Signed-off-by: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220411124955.154876-1-socketcan@hartkopp.net
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>

show more ...

bpf, sockmap: Fix double uncharge the mem of sk_msg

If tcp_bpf_sendmsg is running during a tear down operation, psock may be
freed.

tcp_bpf_sendmsg()
tcp_bpf_send_verdict()
sk_msg_return()
tcp

bpf, sockmap: Fix double uncharge the mem of sk_msg

If tcp_bpf_sendmsg is running during a tear down operation, psock may be
freed.

tcp_bpf_sendmsg()
tcp_bpf_send_verdict()
sk_msg_return()
tcp_bpf_sendmsg_redir()
unlikely(!psock))
sk_msg_free()

The mem of msg has been uncharged in tcp_bpf_send_verdict() by
sk_msg_return(), and would be uncharged by sk_msg_free() again. When psock
is null, we can simply returning an error code, this would then trigger
the sk_msg_free_nocharge in the error path of __SK_REDIRECT and would have
the side effect of throwing an error up to user space. This would be a
slight change in behavior from user side but would look the same as an
error if the redirect on the socket threw an error.

This issue can cause the following info:
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2136 at net/ipv4/af_inet.c:155 inet_sock_destruct+0x13c/0x260
Call Trace:
<TASK>
__sk_destruct+0x24/0x1f0
sk_psock_destroy+0x19b/0x1c0
process_one_work+0x1b3/0x3c0
worker_thread+0x30/0x350
? process_one_work+0x3c0/0x3c0
kthread+0xe6/0x110
? kthread_complete_and_exit+0x20/0x20
ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
</TASK>

Fixes: 604326b41a6f ("bpf, sockmap: convert to generic sk_msg interface")
Signed-off-by: Wang Yufen <wangyufen@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220304081145.2037182-5-wangyufen@huawei.com

show more ...

bpf, sockmap: Fix more uncharged while msg has more_data

In tcp_bpf_send_verdict(), if msg has more data after
tcp_bpf_sendmsg_redir():

tcp_bpf_send_verdict()
tosend = msg->sg.size //msg->sg.size

bpf, sockmap: Fix more uncharged while msg has more_data

In tcp_bpf_send_verdict(), if msg has more data after
tcp_bpf_sendmsg_redir():

tcp_bpf_send_verdict()
tosend = msg->sg.size //msg->sg.size = 22220
case __SK_REDIRECT:
sk_msg_return() //uncharged msg->sg.size(22220) sk->sk_forward_alloc
tcp_bpf_sendmsg_redir() //after tcp_bpf_sendmsg_redir, msg->sg.size=11000
goto more_data;
tosend = msg->sg.size //msg->sg.size = 11000
case __SK_REDIRECT:
sk_msg_return() //uncharged msg->sg.size(11000) to sk->sk_forward_alloc

The msg->sg.size(11000) has been uncharged twice, to fix we can charge the
remaining msg->sg.size before goto more data.

This issue can cause the following info:
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 9860 at net/core/stream.c:208 sk_stream_kill_queues+0xd4/0x1a0
Call Trace:
<TASK>
inet_csk_destroy_sock+0x55/0x110
__tcp_close+0x279/0x470
tcp_close+0x1f/0x60
inet_release+0x3f/0x80
__sock_release+0x3d/0xb0
sock_close+0x11/0x20
__fput+0x92/0x250
task_work_run+0x6a/0xa0
do_exit+0x33b/0xb60
do_group_exit+0x2f/0xa0
get_signal+0xb6/0x950
arch_do_signal_or_restart+0xac/0x2a0
? vfs_write+0x237/0x290
exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0xa9/0x200
syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x12/0x30
do_syscall_64+0x46/0x80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
</TASK>

WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2136 at net/ipv4/af_inet.c:155 inet_sock_destruct+0x13c/0x260
Call Trace:
<TASK>
__sk_destruct+0x24/0x1f0
sk_psock_destroy+0x19b/0x1c0
process_one_work+0x1b3/0x3c0
worker_thread+0x30/0x350
? process_one_work+0x3c0/0x3c0
kthread+0xe6/0x110
? kthread_complete_and_exit+0x20/0x20
ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
</TASK>

Fixes: 604326b41a6f ("bpf, sockmap: convert to generic sk_msg interface")
Signed-off-by: Wang Yufen <wangyufen@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220304081145.2037182-4-wangyufen@huawei.com

show more ...

bpf, sockmap: Fix return codes from tcp_bpf_recvmsg_parser()

Applications can be confused slightly because we do not always return the
same error code as expected, e.g. what the TCP stack normally r

bpf, sockmap: Fix return codes from tcp_bpf_recvmsg_parser()

Applications can be confused slightly because we do not always return the
same error code as expected, e.g. what the TCP stack normally returns. For
example on a sock err sk->sk_err instead of returning the sock_error we
return EAGAIN. This usually means the application will 'try again'
instead of aborting immediately. Another example, when a shutdown event
is received we should immediately abort instead of waiting for data when
the user provides a timeout.

These tend to not be fatal, applications usually recover, but introduces
bogus errors to the user or introduces unexpected latency. Before
'c5d2177a72a16' we fell back to the TCP stack when no data was available
so we managed to catch many of the cases here, although with the extra
latency cost of calling tcp_msg_wait_data() first.

To fix lets duplicate the error handling in TCP stack into tcp_bpf so
that we get the same error codes.

These were found in our CI tests that run applications against sockmap
and do longer lived testing, at least compared to test_sockmap that
does short-lived ping/pong tests, and in some of our test clusters
we deploy.

Its non-trivial to do these in a shorter form CI tests that would be
appropriate for BPF selftests, but we are looking into it so we can
ensure this keeps working going forward. As a preview one idea is to
pull in the packetdrill testing which catches some of this.

Fixes: c5d2177a72a16 ("bpf, sockmap: Fix race in ingress receive verdict with redirect to self")
Signed-off-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220104205918.286416-1-john.fastabend@gmail.com

show more ...

bpf, sockmap: Fix race in ingress receive verdict with redirect to self

A socket in a sockmap may have different combinations of programs attached
depending on configuration. There can be no program

bpf, sockmap: Fix race in ingress receive verdict with redirect to self

A socket in a sockmap may have different combinations of programs attached
depending on configuration. There can be no programs in which case the socket
acts as a sink only. There can be a TX program in this case a BPF program is
attached to sending side, but no RX program is attached. There can be an RX
program only where sends have no BPF program attached, but receives are hooked
with BPF. And finally, both TX and RX programs may be attached. Giving us the
permutations:

None, Tx, Rx, and TxRx

To date most of our use cases have been TX case being used as a fast datapath
to directly copy between local application and a userspace proxy. Or Rx cases
and TxRX applications that are operating an in kernel based proxy. The traffic
in the first case where we hook applications into a userspace application looks
like this:

AppA redirect AppB
Tx <-----------> Rx
| |
+ +
TCP <--> lo <--> TCP

In this case all traffic from AppA (after 3whs) is copied into the AppB
ingress queue and no traffic is ever on the TCP recieive_queue.

In the second case the application never receives, except in some rare error
cases, traffic on the actual user space socket. Instead the send happens in
the kernel.

AppProxy socket pool
sk0 ------------->{sk1,sk2, skn}
^ |
| |
| v
ingress lb egress
TCP TCP

Here because traffic is never read off the socket with userspace recv() APIs
there is only ever one reader on the sk receive_queue. Namely the BPF programs.

However, we've started to introduce a third configuration where the BPF program
on receive should process the data, but then the normal case is to push the
data into the receive queue of AppB.

AppB
recv() (userspace)
-----------------------
tcp_bpf_recvmsg() (kernel)
| |
| |
| |
ingress_msgQ |
| |
RX_BPF |
| |
v v
sk->receive_queue

This is different from the App{A,B} redirect because traffic is first received
on the sk->receive_queue.

Now for the issue. The tcp_bpf_recvmsg() handler first checks the ingress_msg
queue for any data handled by the BPF rx program and returned with PASS code
so that it was enqueued on the ingress msg queue. Then if no data exists on
that queue it checks the socket receive queue. Unfortunately, this is the same
receive_queue the BPF program is reading data off of. So we get a race. Its
possible for the recvmsg() hook to pull data off the receive_queue before the
BPF hook has a chance to read it. It typically happens when an application is
banging on recv() and getting EAGAINs. Until they manage to race with the RX
BPF program.

To fix this we note that before this patch at attach time when the socket is
loaded into the map we check if it needs a TX program or just the base set of
proto bpf hooks. Then it uses the above general RX hook regardless of if we
have a BPF program attached at rx or not. This patch now extends this check to
handle all cases enumerated above, TX, RX, TXRX, and none. And to fix above
race when an RX program is attached we use a new hook that is nearly identical
to the old one except now we do not let the recv() call skip the RX BPF program.
Now only the BPF program pulls data from sk->receive_queue and recv() only
pulls data from the ingress msgQ post BPF program handling.

With this resolved our AppB from above has been up and running for many hours
without detecting any errors. We do this by correlating counters in RX BPF
events and the AppB to ensure data is never skipping the BPF program. Selftests,
was not able to detect this because we only run them for a short period of time
on well ordered send/recvs so we don't get any of the noise we see in real
application environments.

Fixes: 51199405f9672 ("bpf: skb_verdict, support SK_PASS on RX BPF path")
Signed-off-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Tested-by: Jussi Maki <joamaki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211103204736.248403-4-john.fastabend@gmail.com

show more ...