net: extract a few internals from netdevice.h

There's a number of functions and static variables used
under net/core/ but not from the outside. We currently
dump most of them into netdevice.h. That

net: extract a few internals from netdevice.h

There's a number of functions and static variables used
under net/core/ but not from the outside. We currently
dump most of them into netdevice.h. That bad for many
reasons:
- netdevice.h is very cluttered, hard to figure out
what the APIs are;
- netdevice.h is very long;
- we have to touch netdevice.h more which causes expensive
incremental builds.

Create a header under net/core/ and move some declarations.

The new header is also a bit of a catch-all but that's
fine, if we create more specific headers people will
likely over-think where their declaration fit best.
And end up putting them in netdevice.h, again.

More work should be done on splitting netdevice.h into more
targeted headers, but that'd be more time consuming so small
steps.

Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>

show more ...

dev_addr_list: put the first addr on the tree

Since all netdev->dev_addr modifications go via dev_addr_mod()
we can put it on the list. When address is change remove it
and add it back.

Signed-off-

dev_addr_list: put the first addr on the tree

Since all netdev->dev_addr modifications go via dev_addr_mod()
we can put it on the list. When address is change remove it
and add it back.

Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

show more ...

dev_addr: add a modification check

netdev->dev_addr should only be modified via helpers,
but someone may be casting off the const. Add a runtime
check to catch abuses.

Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski

dev_addr: add a modification check

netdev->dev_addr should only be modified via helpers,
but someone may be casting off the const. Add a runtime
check to catch abuses.

Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

show more ...

net: unexport dev_addr_init() & dev_addr_flush()

There are no module callers in-tree and it's hard to justify
why anyone would init or flush addresses of a netdev (note
the flush is more of a destru

net: unexport dev_addr_init() & dev_addr_flush()

There are no module callers in-tree and it's hard to justify
why anyone would init or flush addresses of a netdev (note
the flush is more of a destructor, it frees netdev->dev_addr).

Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

show more ...

net: constify netdev->dev_addr

Commit 406f42fa0d3c ("net-next: When a bond have a massive amount
of VLANs...") introduced a rbtree for faster Ethernet address look
up. We converted all users to make

net: constify netdev->dev_addr

Commit 406f42fa0d3c ("net-next: When a bond have a massive amount
of VLANs...") introduced a rbtree for faster Ethernet address look
up. We converted all users to make modifications via appropriate
helpers, make netdev->dev_addr const.

The update helpers need to upcast from the buffer to
struct netdev_hw_addr.

Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

show more ...

net: dev_addr_list: handle first address in __hw_addr_add_ex

struct dev_addr_list is used for device addresses, unicast addresses
and multicast addresses. The first of those needs special handling
o

net: dev_addr_list: handle first address in __hw_addr_add_ex

struct dev_addr_list is used for device addresses, unicast addresses
and multicast addresses. The first of those needs special handling
of the main address - netdev->dev_addr points directly the data
of the entry and drivers write to it freely, so we can't maintain
it in the rbtree (for now, at least, to be fixed in net-next).

Current work around sprinkles special handling of the first
address on the list throughout the code but it missed the case
where address is being added. First address will not be visible
during subsequent adds.

Syzbot found a warning where unicast addresses are modified
without holding the rtnl lock, tl;dr is that team generates
the same modification multiple times, not necessarily when
right locks are held.

In the repro we have:

macvlan -> team -> veth

macvlan adds a unicast address to the team. Team then pushes
that address down to its memebers (veths). Next something unrelated
makes team sync member addrs again, and because of the bug
the addr entries get duplicated in the veths. macvlan gets
removed, removes its addr from team which removes only one
of the duplicated addresses from veths. This removal is done
under rtnl. Next syzbot uses iptables to add a multicast addr
to team (which does not hold rtnl lock). Team syncs veth addrs,
but because veths' unicast list still has the duplicate it will
also get sync, even though this update is intended for mc addresses.
Again, uc address updates need rtnl lock, boom.

Reported-by: syzbot+7a2ab2cdc14d134de553@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: 406f42fa0d3c ("net-next: When a bond have a massive amount of VLANs with IPv6 addresses, performance of changing link state, attaching a VRF, changing an IPv6 address, etc. go down dramtically.")
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

show more ...

net-next: When a bond have a massive amount of VLANs with IPv6 addresses, performance of changing link state, attaching a VRF, changing an IPv6 address, etc. go down dramtically.

The source of most

net-next: When a bond have a massive amount of VLANs with IPv6 addresses, performance of changing link state, attaching a VRF, changing an IPv6 address, etc. go down dramtically.

The source of most of the slow down is the `dev_addr_lists.c` module,
which mainatins a linked list of HW addresses.
When using IPv6, this list grows for each IPv6 address added on a
VLAN, since each IPv6 address has a multicast HW address associated with
it.

When performing any modification to the involved links, this list is
traversed many times, often for nothing, all while holding the RTNL
lock.

Instead, this patch adds an auxilliary rbtree which cuts down
traversal time significantly.

Performance can be seen with the following script:

#!/bin/bash
ip netns del test || true 2>/dev/null
ip netns add test

echo 1 | ip netns exec test tee /proc/sys/net/ipv6/conf/all/keep_addr_on_down > /dev/null

set -e

ip -n test link add foo type veth peer name bar
ip -n test link add b1 type bond
ip -n test link add florp type vrf table 10

ip -n test link set bar master b1
ip -n test link set foo up
ip -n test link set bar up
ip -n test link set b1 up
ip -n test link set florp up

VLAN_COUNT=1500
BASE_DEV=b1

echo Creating vlans
ip netns exec test time -p bash -c "for i in \$(seq 1 $VLAN_COUNT);
do ip -n test link add link $BASE_DEV name foo.\$i type vlan id \$i; done"

echo Bringing them up
ip netns exec test time -p bash -c "for i in \$(seq 1 $VLAN_COUNT);
do ip -n test link set foo.\$i up; done"

echo Assiging IPv6 Addresses
ip netns exec test time -p bash -c "for i in \$(seq 1 $VLAN_COUNT);
do ip -n test address add dev foo.\$i 2000::\$i/64; done"

echo Attaching to VRF
ip netns exec test time -p bash -c "for i in \$(seq 1 $VLAN_COUNT);
do ip -n test link set foo.\$i master florp; done"

On an Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2650 v3 @ 2.30GHz machine, the performance
before the patch is (truncated):

Creating vlans
real 108.35
Bringing them up
real 4.96
Assiging IPv6 Addresses
real 19.22
Attaching to VRF
real 458.84

After the patch:

Creating vlans
real 5.59
Bringing them up
real 5.07
Assiging IPv6 Addresses
real 5.64
Attaching to VRF
real 25.37

Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: Lu Wei <luwei32@huawei.com>
Cc: Xiongfeng Wang <wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com>
Cc: Taehee Yoo <ap420073@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Gilad Naaman <gnaaman@drivenets.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

show more ...

net: core: Correct function name dev_uc_flush() in the kerneldoc

Fix the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):

net/core/dev_addr_lists.c:732: warning: expecting prototype for dev_uc_flush(). Prot

net: core: Correct function name dev_uc_flush() in the kerneldoc

Fix the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):

net/core/dev_addr_lists.c:732: warning: expecting prototype for dev_uc_flush(). Prototype was for dev_uc_init() instead

Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Xiongfeng Wang <wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

show more ...

net: core: Fix a typo in dev_addr_lists.c

Modify "funciton" to "function" in net/core/dev_addr_lists.c.

Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Lu Wei <luwei32@huawei.com>
Signed

net: core: Fix a typo in dev_addr_lists.c

Modify "funciton" to "function" in net/core/dev_addr_lists.c.

Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Lu Wei <luwei32@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

show more ...

net: core: add nested_level variable in net_device

This patch is to add a new variable 'nested_level' into the net_device
structure.
This variable will be used as a parameter of spin_lock_nested() o

net: core: add nested_level variable in net_device

This patch is to add a new variable 'nested_level' into the net_device
structure.
This variable will be used as a parameter of spin_lock_nested() of
dev->addr_list_lock.

netif_addr_lock() can be called recursively so spin_lock_nested() is
used instead of spin_lock() and dev->lower_level is used as a parameter
of spin_lock_nested().
But, dev->lower_level value can be updated while it is being used.
So, lockdep would warn a possible deadlock scenario.

When a stacked interface is deleted, netif_{uc | mc}_sync() is
called recursively.
So, spin_lock_nested() is called recursively too.
At this moment, the dev->lower_level variable is used as a parameter of it.
dev->lower_level value is updated when interfaces are being unlinked/linked
immediately.
Thus, After unlinking, dev->lower_level shouldn't be a parameter of
spin_lock_nested().

A (macvlan)
|
B (vlan)
|
C (bridge)
|
D (macvlan)
|
E (vlan)
|
F (bridge)

A->lower_level : 6
B->lower_level : 5
C->lower_level : 4
D->lower_level : 3
E->lower_level : 2
F->lower_level : 1

When an interface 'A' is removed, it releases resources.
At this moment, netif_addr_lock() would be called.
Then, netdev_upper_dev_unlink() is called recursively.
Then dev->lower_level is updated.
There is no problem.

But, when the bridge module is removed, 'C' and 'F' interfaces
are removed at once.
If 'F' is removed first, a lower_level value is like below.
A->lower_level : 5
B->lower_level : 4
C->lower_level : 3
D->lower_level : 2
E->lower_level : 1
F->lower_level : 1

Then, 'C' is removed. at this moment, netif_addr_lock() is called
recursively.
The ordering is like this.
C(3)->D(2)->E(1)->F(1)
At this moment, the lower_level value of 'E' and 'F' are the same.
So, lockdep warns a possible deadlock scenario.

In order to avoid this problem, a new variable 'nested_level' is added.
This value is the same as dev->lower_level - 1.
But this value is updated in rtnl_unlock().
So, this variable can be used as a parameter of spin_lock_nested() safely
in the rtnl context.

Test commands:
ip link add br0 type bridge vlan_filtering 1
ip link add vlan1 link br0 type vlan id 10
ip link add macvlan2 link vlan1 type macvlan
ip link add br3 type bridge vlan_filtering 1
ip link set macvlan2 master br3
ip link add vlan4 link br3 type vlan id 10
ip link add macvlan5 link vlan4 type macvlan
ip link add br6 type bridge vlan_filtering 1
ip link set macvlan5 master br6
ip link add vlan7 link br6 type vlan id 10
ip link add macvlan8 link vlan7 type macvlan

ip link set br0 up
ip link set vlan1 up
ip link set macvlan2 up
ip link set br3 up
ip link set vlan4 up
ip link set macvlan5 up
ip link set br6 up
ip link set vlan7 up
ip link set macvlan8 up
modprobe -rv bridge

Splat looks like:
[ 36.057436][ T744] WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
[ 36.058848][ T744] 5.9.0-rc6+ #728 Not tainted
[ 36.059959][ T744] --------------------------------------------
[ 36.061391][ T744] ip/744 is trying to acquire lock:
[ 36.062590][ T744] ffff8c4767509280 (&vlan_netdev_addr_lock_key){+...}-{2:2}, at: dev_set_rx_mode+0x19/0x30
[ 36.064922][ T744]
[ 36.064922][ T744] but task is already holding lock:
[ 36.066626][ T744] ffff8c4767769280 (&vlan_netdev_addr_lock_key){+...}-{2:2}, at: dev_uc_add+0x1e/0x60
[ 36.068851][ T744]
[ 36.068851][ T744] other info that might help us debug this:
[ 36.070731][ T744] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[ 36.070731][ T744]
[ 36.072497][ T744] CPU0
[ 36.073238][ T744] ----
[ 36.074007][ T744] lock(&vlan_netdev_addr_lock_key);
[ 36.075290][ T744] lock(&vlan_netdev_addr_lock_key);
[ 36.076590][ T744]
[ 36.076590][ T744] *** DEADLOCK ***
[ 36.076590][ T744]
[ 36.078515][ T744] May be due to missing lock nesting notation
[ 36.078515][ T744]
[ 36.080491][ T744] 3 locks held by ip/744:
[ 36.081471][ T744] #0: ffffffff98571df0 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x236/0x490
[ 36.083614][ T744] #1: ffff8c4767769280 (&vlan_netdev_addr_lock_key){+...}-{2:2}, at: dev_uc_add+0x1e/0x60
[ 36.085942][ T744] #2: ffff8c476c8da280 (&bridge_netdev_addr_lock_key/4){+...}-{2:2}, at: dev_uc_sync+0x39/0x80
[ 36.088400][ T744]
[ 36.088400][ T744] stack backtrace:
[ 36.089772][ T744] CPU: 6 PID: 744 Comm: ip Not tainted 5.9.0-rc6+ #728
[ 36.091364][ T744] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.10.2-1ubuntu1 04/01/2014
[ 36.093630][ T744] Call Trace:
[ 36.094416][ T744] dump_stack+0x77/0x9b
[ 36.095385][ T744] __lock_acquire+0xbc3/0x1f40
[ 36.096522][ T744] lock_acquire+0xb4/0x3b0
[ 36.097540][ T744] ? dev_set_rx_mode+0x19/0x30
[ 36.098657][ T744] ? rtmsg_ifinfo+0x1f/0x30
[ 36.099711][ T744] ? __dev_notify_flags+0xa5/0xf0
[ 36.100874][ T744] ? rtnl_is_locked+0x11/0x20
[ 36.101967][ T744] ? __dev_set_promiscuity+0x7b/0x1a0
[ 36.103230][ T744] _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x38/0x70
[ 36.104348][ T744] ? dev_set_rx_mode+0x19/0x30
[ 36.105461][ T744] dev_set_rx_mode+0x19/0x30
[ 36.106532][ T744] dev_set_promiscuity+0x36/0x50
[ 36.107692][ T744] __dev_set_promiscuity+0x123/0x1a0
[ 36.108929][ T744] dev_set_promiscuity+0x1e/0x50
[ 36.110093][ T744] br_port_set_promisc+0x1f/0x40 [bridge]
[ 36.111415][ T744] br_manage_promisc+0x8b/0xe0 [bridge]
[ 36.112728][ T744] __dev_set_promiscuity+0x123/0x1a0
[ 36.113967][ T744] ? __hw_addr_sync_one+0x23/0x50
[ 36.115135][ T744] __dev_set_rx_mode+0x68/0x90
[ 36.116249][ T744] dev_uc_sync+0x70/0x80
[ 36.117244][ T744] dev_uc_add+0x50/0x60
[ 36.118223][ T744] macvlan_open+0x18e/0x1f0 [macvlan]
[ 36.119470][ T744] __dev_open+0xd6/0x170
[ 36.120470][ T744] __dev_change_flags+0x181/0x1d0
[ 36.121644][ T744] dev_change_flags+0x23/0x60
[ 36.122741][ T744] do_setlink+0x30a/0x11e0
[ 36.123778][ T744] ? __lock_acquire+0x92c/0x1f40
[ 36.124929][ T744] ? __nla_validate_parse.part.6+0x45/0x8e0
[ 36.126309][ T744] ? __lock_acquire+0x92c/0x1f40
[ 36.127457][ T744] __rtnl_newlink+0x546/0x8e0
[ 36.128560][ T744] ? lock_acquire+0xb4/0x3b0
[ 36.129623][ T744] ? deactivate_slab.isra.85+0x6a1/0x850
[ 36.130946][ T744] ? __lock_acquire+0x92c/0x1f40
[ 36.132102][ T744] ? lock_acquire+0xb4/0x3b0
[ 36.133176][ T744] ? is_bpf_text_address+0x5/0xe0
[ 36.134364][ T744] ? rtnl_newlink+0x2e/0x70
[ 36.135445][ T744] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x32/0x60
[ 36.136771][ T744] ? kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x2d8/0x380
[ 36.138070][ T744] ? rtnl_newlink+0x2e/0x70
[ 36.139164][ T744] rtnl_newlink+0x47/0x70
[ ... ]

Fixes: 845e0ebb4408 ("net: change addr_list_lock back to static key")
Signed-off-by: Taehee Yoo <ap420073@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

show more ...

net: explain the lockdep annotations for dev_uc_unsync()

The lockdep annotations for dev_uc_unsync() and dev_mc_unsync()
are not easy to understand, so add some comments to explain
why they are corr

net: explain the lockdep annotations for dev_uc_unsync()

The lockdep annotations for dev_uc_unsync() and dev_mc_unsync()
are not easy to understand, so add some comments to explain
why they are correct.

Similar for the rest netif_addr_lock_bh() cases, they don't
need nested version.

Cc: Taehee Yoo <ap420073@gmail.com>
Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

show more ...

net: change addr_list_lock back to static key

The dynamic key update for addr_list_lock still causes troubles,
for example the following race condition still exists:

CPU 0: CPU 1:
(RCU read lock

net: change addr_list_lock back to static key

The dynamic key update for addr_list_lock still causes troubles,
for example the following race condition still exists:

CPU 0: CPU 1:
(RCU read lock) (RTNL lock)
dev_mc_seq_show() netdev_update_lockdep_key()
-> lockdep_unregister_key()
-> netif_addr_lock_bh()

because lockdep doesn't provide an API to update it atomically.
Therefore, we have to move it back to static keys and use subclass
for nest locking like before.

In commit 1a33e10e4a95 ("net: partially revert dynamic lockdep key
changes"), I already reverted most parts of commit ab92d68fc22f
("net: core: add generic lockdep keys").

This patch reverts the rest and also part of commit f3b0a18bb6cb
("net: remove unnecessary variables and callback"). After this
patch, addr_list_lock changes back to using static keys and
subclasses to satisfy lockdep. Thanks to dev->lower_level, we do
not have to change back to ->ndo_get_lock_subclass().

And hopefully this reduces some syzbot lockdep noises too.

Reported-by: syzbot+f3a0e80c34b3fc28ac5e@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Cc: Taehee Yoo <ap420073@gmail.com>
Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

show more ...

net: remove unnecessary variables and callback

This patch removes variables and callback these are related to the nested
device structure.
devices that can be nested have their own nest_level variab

net: remove unnecessary variables and callback

This patch removes variables and callback these are related to the nested
device structure.
devices that can be nested have their own nest_level variable that
represents the depth of nested devices.
In the previous patch, new {lower/upper}_level variables are added and
they replace old private nest_level variable.
So, this patch removes all 'nest_level' variables.

In order to avoid lockdep warning, ->ndo_get_lock_subclass() was added
to get lockdep subclass value, which is actually lower nested depth value.
But now, they use the dynamic lockdep key to avoid lockdep warning instead
of the subclass.
So, this patch removes ->ndo_get_lock_subclass() callback.

Signed-off-by: Taehee Yoo <ap420073@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

show more ...

treewide: Replace GPLv2 boilerplate/reference with SPDX - rule 152

Based on 1 normalized pattern(s):

this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify
it under the terms of th

treewide: Replace GPLv2 boilerplate/reference with SPDX - rule 152

Based on 1 normalized pattern(s):

this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify
it under the terms of the gnu general public license as published by
the free software foundation either version 2 of the license or at
your option any later version

extracted by the scancode license scanner the SPDX license identifier

GPL-2.0-or-later

has been chosen to replace the boilerplate/reference in 3029 file(s).

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Allison Randal <allison@lohutok.net>
Cc: linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190527070032.746973796@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

show more ...

net: dev: Issue NETDEV_PRE_CHANGEADDR

When a device address is about to be changed, or an address added to the
list of device HW addresses, it is necessary to ensure that all
interested parties can

net: dev: Issue NETDEV_PRE_CHANGEADDR

When a device address is about to be changed, or an address added to the
list of device HW addresses, it is necessary to ensure that all
interested parties can support the address. Therefore, send the
NETDEV_PRE_CHANGEADDR notification, and if anyone bails on it, do not
change the address.

Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@mellanox.com>
Acked-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>
Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

show more ...

net: core: dev_addr_lists: add auxiliary func to handle reference address updates

In order to avoid all table update, and only remove or add new
address, the auxiliary function exists, named __hw_ad

net: core: dev_addr_lists: add auxiliary func to handle reference address updates

In order to avoid all table update, and only remove or add new
address, the auxiliary function exists, named __hw_addr_sync_dev().
It allows end driver do nothing when nothing changed and add/rm when
concrete address is firstly added or lastly removed. But it doesn't
include cases when an address of real device or vlan was reused by
other vlans or vlan/macval devices.

For handaling events when address was reused/unreused the patch adds
new auxiliary routine - __hw_addr_ref_sync_dev(). It allows to do
nothing when nothing was changed and do updates only for an address
being added/reused/deleted/unreused. Thus, clone address changes for
vlans can be mirrored in the table. The function is exclusive with
__hw_addr_sync_dev(). It's responsibility of the end driver to
identify address vlan device, if it needs so.

Signed-off-by: Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

show more ...

net: change the comment of dev_mc_init

The comment of dev_mc_init() is wrong. which use dev_mc_flush
instead of dev_mc_init.

Signed-off-by: Lianwen Sun <sunlw.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com
Signed-off-by: Dav

net: change the comment of dev_mc_init

The comment of dev_mc_init() is wrong. which use dev_mc_flush
instead of dev_mc_init.

Signed-off-by: Lianwen Sun <sunlw.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

show more ...

net: fix uninit-value in __hw_addr_add_ex()

syzbot complained :

BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in memcmp+0x119/0x180 lib/string.c:861
CPU: 0 PID: 3 Comm: kworker/0:0 Not tainted 4.16.0+ #82
Hardware name

net: fix uninit-value in __hw_addr_add_ex()

syzbot complained :

BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in memcmp+0x119/0x180 lib/string.c:861
CPU: 0 PID: 3 Comm: kworker/0:0 Not tainted 4.16.0+ #82
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011
Workqueue: ipv6_addrconf addrconf_dad_work
Call Trace:
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:17 [inline]
dump_stack+0x185/0x1d0 lib/dump_stack.c:53
kmsan_report+0x142/0x240 mm/kmsan/kmsan.c:1067
__msan_warning_32+0x6c/0xb0 mm/kmsan/kmsan_instr.c:676
memcmp+0x119/0x180 lib/string.c:861
__hw_addr_add_ex net/core/dev_addr_lists.c:60 [inline]
__dev_mc_add+0x1c2/0x8e0 net/core/dev_addr_lists.c:670
dev_mc_add+0x6d/0x80 net/core/dev_addr_lists.c:687
igmp6_group_added+0x2db/0xa00 net/ipv6/mcast.c:662
ipv6_dev_mc_inc+0xe9e/0x1130 net/ipv6/mcast.c:914
addrconf_join_solict net/ipv6/addrconf.c:2078 [inline]
addrconf_dad_begin net/ipv6/addrconf.c:3828 [inline]
addrconf_dad_work+0x427/0x2150 net/ipv6/addrconf.c:3954
process_one_work+0x12c6/0x1f60 kernel/workqueue.c:2113
worker_thread+0x113c/0x24f0 kernel/workqueue.c:2247
kthread+0x539/0x720 kernel/kthread.c:239

Fixes: f001fde5eadd ("net: introduce a list of device addresses dev_addr_list (v6)")
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Reported-by: syzbot <syzkaller@googlegroups.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

show more ...

net: fix spelling for synchronized

Signed-off-by: Fabian Frederick <fabf@skynet.be>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

net: Add support for device specific address syncing

This change provides a function to be used in order to break the
ndo_set_rx_mode call into a set of address add and remove calls. The code
is ba

net: Add support for device specific address syncing

This change provides a function to be used in order to break the
ndo_set_rx_mode call into a set of address add and remove calls. The code
is based on the implementation of dev_uc_sync/dev_mc_sync. Since they
essentially do the same thing but with only one dev I simply named my
functions __dev_uc_sync/__dev_mc_sync.

I also implemented an unsync version of the functions as well to allow for
cleanup on close.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

show more ...

net: Correctly sync addresses from multiple sources to single device

When we have multiple devices attempting to sync the same address
to a single destination, each device should be permitted to syn

net: Correctly sync addresses from multiple sources to single device

When we have multiple devices attempting to sync the same address
to a single destination, each device should be permitted to sync
it once. To accomplish this, pass the 'sync_cnt' of the source
address when adding the addresss to the lower device. 'sync_cnt'
tracks how many time a given address has been succefully synced.
This way, we know that if the 'sync_cnt' passed in is 0, we should
sync this address.

Also, turn 'synced' member back into the counter as was originally
done in
commit 4543fbefe6e06a9e40d9f2b28d688393a299f079.
net: count hw_addr syncs so that unsync works properly.
It tracks how many time a given address has been added via a
'sync' operation. For every successfull 'sync' the counter is
incremented, and for ever 'unsync', the counter is decremented.
This makes sure that the address will be properly removed from
the the lower device when all the upper devices have removed it.

Reported-by: Andrey Dmitrov <andrey.dmitrov@oktetlabs.ru>
CC: Andrey Dmitrov <andrey.dmitrov@oktetlabs.ru>
CC: Alexandra N. Kossovsky <Alexandra.Kossovsky@oktetlabs.ru>
CC: Konstantin Ushakov <Konstantin.Ushakov@oktetlabs.ru>
Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevic@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

show more ...

net: remove dead code for add/del multiple

These function to manipulate multiple addresses are not used anywhere
in current net-next tree. Some out of tree code maybe using these but
too bad; they s

net: remove dead code for add/del multiple

These function to manipulate multiple addresses are not used anywhere
in current net-next tree. Some out of tree code maybe using these but
too bad; they should submit their code upstream..

Also, make __hw_addr_flush local since only used by dev_addr_lists.c

Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

show more ...

net, mc: fix the incorrect comments in two mc-related functions

Signed-off-by: Zhi Yong Wu <wuzhy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

net/core: dev_mc_sync_multiple calls wrong helper

The dev_mc_sync_multiple function is currently calling
__hw_addr_sync, and not __hw_addr_sync_multiple. This will result in
addresses only being sy

net/core: dev_mc_sync_multiple calls wrong helper

The dev_mc_sync_multiple function is currently calling
__hw_addr_sync, and not __hw_addr_sync_multiple. This will result in
addresses only being synced to the first device from the set.

Corrected by calling the _multiple variant.

Signed-off-by: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevic@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Shawn Bohrer <sbohrer@rgmadvisors.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

show more ...

net/core: __hw_addr_sync_one / _multiple broken

Currently, __hw_addr_sync_one is called in a loop by
__hw_addr_sync_multiple to sync each of a "from" device's hw addresses
to a "to" device. __hw_ad

net/core: __hw_addr_sync_one / _multiple broken

Currently, __hw_addr_sync_one is called in a loop by
__hw_addr_sync_multiple to sync each of a "from" device's hw addresses
to a "to" device. __hw_addr_sync_one calls __hw_addr_add_ex to attempt
to add each address. __hw_addr_add_ex is called with global=false, and
sync=true.

__hw_addr_add_ex checks to see if the new address matches an
address already on the list. If so, it tests global and sync. In this
case, sync=true, and it then checks if the address is already synced,
and if so, returns 0.

This 0 return causes __hw_addr_sync_one to increment the sync_cnt
and refcount for the "from" list's address entry, even though the address
is already synced and has a reference and sync_cnt. This will cause
the sync_cnt and refcount to increment without bound every time an
addresses is added to the "from" device and synced to the "to" device.

The fix here has two parts:

First, when __hw_addr_add_ex finds the address already exists
and is synced, return -EEXIST instead of 0.

Second, __hw_addr_sync_one checks the error return for -EEXIST,
and if so, it (a) does not add a refcount/sync_cnt, and (b) returns 0
itself so that __hw_addr_sync_multiple will not return an error.

Signed-off-by: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevic@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Shawn Bohrer <sbohrer@rgmadvisors.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

show more ...