can: raw: add missing refcount for memory leak fix

Commit ee8b94c8510c ("can: raw: fix receiver memory leak") introduced
a new reference to the CAN netdevice that has assigned CAN filters.
But this

can: raw: add missing refcount for memory leak fix

Commit ee8b94c8510c ("can: raw: fix receiver memory leak") introduced
a new reference to the CAN netdevice that has assigned CAN filters.
But this new ro->dev reference did not maintain its own refcount which
lead to another KASAN use-after-free splat found by Eric Dumazet.

This patch ensures a proper refcount for the CAN nedevice.

Fixes: ee8b94c8510c ("can: raw: fix receiver memory leak")
Reported-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Ziyang Xuan <william.xuanziyang@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230821144547.6658-3-socketcan@hartkopp.net
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>

show more ...

net: annotate data-races around sk->sk_mark

sk->sk_mark is often read while another thread could change the value.

Fixes: 4a19ec5800fc ("[NET]: Introducing socket mark socket option.")
Signed-off-b

net: annotate data-races around sk->sk_mark

sk->sk_mark is often read while another thread could change the value.

Fixes: 4a19ec5800fc ("[NET]: Introducing socket mark socket option.")
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

show more ...

can: raw: fix lockdep issue in raw_release()

syzbot complained about a lockdep issue [1]

Since raw_bind() and raw_setsockopt() first get RTNL
before locking the socket, we must adopt the same order

can: raw: fix lockdep issue in raw_release()

syzbot complained about a lockdep issue [1]

Since raw_bind() and raw_setsockopt() first get RTNL
before locking the socket, we must adopt the same order in raw_release()

[1]
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.5.0-rc1-syzkaller-00192-g78adb4bcf99e #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
syz-executor.0/14110 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff88804e4b6130 (sk_lock-AF_CAN){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: lock_sock include/net/sock.h:1708 [inline]
ffff88804e4b6130 (sk_lock-AF_CAN){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: raw_bind+0xb1/0xab0 net/can/raw.c:435

but task is already holding lock:
ffffffff8e3df368 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: raw_bind+0xa7/0xab0 net/can/raw.c:434

which lock already depends on the new lock.

the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

-> #1 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
__mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:603 [inline]
__mutex_lock+0x181/0x1340 kernel/locking/mutex.c:747
raw_release+0x1c6/0x9b0 net/can/raw.c:391
__sock_release+0xcd/0x290 net/socket.c:654
sock_close+0x1c/0x20 net/socket.c:1386
__fput+0x3fd/0xac0 fs/file_table.c:384
task_work_run+0x14d/0x240 kernel/task_work.c:179
resume_user_mode_work include/linux/resume_user_mode.h:49 [inline]
exit_to_user_mode_loop kernel/entry/common.c:171 [inline]
exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x210/0x240 kernel/entry/common.c:204
__syscall_exit_to_user_mode_work kernel/entry/common.c:286 [inline]
syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x1d/0x50 kernel/entry/common.c:297
do_syscall_64+0x44/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:86
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd

-> #0 (sk_lock-AF_CAN){+.+.}-{0:0}:
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3142 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3261 [inline]
validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3876 [inline]
__lock_acquire+0x2e3d/0x5de0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5144
lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5761 [inline]
lock_acquire+0x1ae/0x510 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5726
lock_sock_nested+0x3a/0xf0 net/core/sock.c:3492
lock_sock include/net/sock.h:1708 [inline]
raw_bind+0xb1/0xab0 net/can/raw.c:435
__sys_bind+0x1ec/0x220 net/socket.c:1792
__do_sys_bind net/socket.c:1803 [inline]
__se_sys_bind net/socket.c:1801 [inline]
__x64_sys_bind+0x72/0xb0 net/socket.c:1801
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x38/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd

other info that might help us debug this:

Possible unsafe locking scenario:

CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(rtnl_mutex);
lock(sk_lock-AF_CAN);
lock(rtnl_mutex);
lock(sk_lock-AF_CAN);

*** DEADLOCK ***

1 lock held by syz-executor.0/14110:

stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 PID: 14110 Comm: syz-executor.0 Not tainted 6.5.0-rc1-syzkaller-00192-g78adb4bcf99e #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 07/03/2023
Call Trace:
<TASK>
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
dump_stack_lvl+0xd9/0x1b0 lib/dump_stack.c:106
check_noncircular+0x311/0x3f0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2195
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3142 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3261 [inline]
validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3876 [inline]
__lock_acquire+0x2e3d/0x5de0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5144
lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5761 [inline]
lock_acquire+0x1ae/0x510 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5726
lock_sock_nested+0x3a/0xf0 net/core/sock.c:3492
lock_sock include/net/sock.h:1708 [inline]
raw_bind+0xb1/0xab0 net/can/raw.c:435
__sys_bind+0x1ec/0x220 net/socket.c:1792
__do_sys_bind net/socket.c:1803 [inline]
__se_sys_bind net/socket.c:1801 [inline]
__x64_sys_bind+0x72/0xb0 net/socket.c:1801
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x38/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
RIP: 0033:0x7fd89007cb29
Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 e1 20 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b0 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007fd890d2a0c8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000031
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007fd89019bf80 RCX: 00007fd89007cb29
RDX: 0000000000000010 RSI: 0000000020000040 RDI: 0000000000000003
RBP: 00007fd8900c847a R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 000000000000000b R14: 00007fd89019bf80 R15: 00007ffebf8124f8
</TASK>

Fixes: ee8b94c8510c ("can: raw: fix receiver memory leak")
Reported-by: syzbot <syzkaller@googlegroups.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Ziyang Xuan <william.xuanziyang@huawei.com>
Cc: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230720114438.172434-1-edumazet@google.com
Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>

show more ...

can: raw: fix receiver memory leak

Got kmemleak errors with the following ltp can_filter testcase:

for ((i=1; i<=100; i++))
do
./can_filter &
sleep 0.1
done

=======================

can: raw: fix receiver memory leak

Got kmemleak errors with the following ltp can_filter testcase:

for ((i=1; i<=100; i++))
do
./can_filter &
sleep 0.1
done

==============================================================
[<00000000db4a4943>] can_rx_register+0x147/0x360 [can]
[<00000000a289549d>] raw_setsockopt+0x5ef/0x853 [can_raw]
[<000000006d3d9ebd>] __sys_setsockopt+0x173/0x2c0
[<00000000407dbfec>] __x64_sys_setsockopt+0x61/0x70
[<00000000fd468496>] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40
[<00000000b7e47d51>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x61/0xc6

It's a bug in the concurrent scenario of unregister_netdevice_many()
and raw_release() as following:

cpu0 cpu1
unregister_netdevice_many(can_dev)
unlist_netdevice(can_dev) // dev_get_by_index() return NULL after this
net_set_todo(can_dev)
raw_release(can_socket)
dev = dev_get_by_index(, ro->ifindex); // dev == NULL
if (dev) { // receivers in dev_rcv_lists not free because dev is NULL
raw_disable_allfilters(, dev, );
dev_put(dev);
}
...
ro->bound = 0;
...

call_netdevice_notifiers(NETDEV_UNREGISTER, )
raw_notify(, NETDEV_UNREGISTER, )
if (ro->bound) // invalid because ro->bound has been set 0
raw_disable_allfilters(, dev, ); // receivers in dev_rcv_lists will never be freed

Add a net_device pointer member in struct raw_sock to record bound
can_dev, and use rtnl_lock to serialize raw_socket members between
raw_bind(), raw_release(), raw_setsockopt() and raw_notify(). Use
ro->dev to decide whether to free receivers in dev_rcv_lists.

Fixes: 8d0caedb7596 ("can: bcm/raw/isotp: use per module netdevice notifier")
Reviewed-by: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>
Acked-by: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>
Signed-off-by: Ziyang Xuan <william.xuanziyang@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230711011737.1969582-1-william.xuanziyang@huawei.com
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>

show more ...

sock: Remove ->sendpage*() in favour of sendmsg(MSG_SPLICE_PAGES)

Remove ->sendpage() and ->sendpage_locked(). sendmsg() with
MSG_SPLICE_PAGES should be used instead. This allows multiple pages an

sock: Remove ->sendpage*() in favour of sendmsg(MSG_SPLICE_PAGES)

Remove ->sendpage() and ->sendpage_locked(). sendmsg() with
MSG_SPLICE_PAGES should be used instead. This allows multiple pages and
multipage folios to be passed through.

Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de> # for net/can
cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
cc: mptcp@lists.linux.dev
cc: rds-devel@oss.oracle.com
cc: tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
cc: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230623225513.2732256-16-dhowells@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>

show more ...

can: raw: use temp variable instead of rolling back config

Introduce a temporary variable to check for an invalid configuration
attempt from user space. Before this patch the value was copied to
the

can: raw: use temp variable instead of rolling back config

Introduce a temporary variable to check for an invalid configuration
attempt from user space. Before this patch the value was copied to
the real config variable and rolled back in the case of an error.

Suggested-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230203090807.97100-1-socketcan@hartkopp.net
Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>

show more ...

can: raw: fix CAN FD frame transmissions over CAN XL devices

A CAN XL device is always capable to process CAN FD frames. The former
check when sending CAN FD frames relied on the existence of a CAN

can: raw: fix CAN FD frame transmissions over CAN XL devices

A CAN XL device is always capable to process CAN FD frames. The former
check when sending CAN FD frames relied on the existence of a CAN FD
device and did not check for a CAN XL device that would be correct
too.

With this patch the CAN FD feature is enabled automatically when CAN
XL is switched on - and CAN FD cannot be switch off while CAN XL is
enabled.

This precondition also leads to a clean up and reduction of checks in
the hot path in raw_rcv() and raw_sendmsg(). Some conditions are
reordered to handle simple checks first.

changes since v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230131091012.50553-1-socketcan@hartkopp.net
- fixed typo: devive -> device
changes since v2: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230131091824.51026-1-socketcan@hartkopp.net/
- reorder checks in if statements to handle simple checks first

Fixes: 626332696d75 ("can: raw: add CAN XL support")
Signed-off-by: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230131105613.55228-1-socketcan@hartkopp.net
Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>

show more ...

can: raw: add support for SO_MARK

Add support for SO_MARK to the CAN_RAW protocol. This makes it
possible to add traffic control filters based on the fwmark.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221

can: raw: add support for SO_MARK

Add support for SO_MARK to the CAN_RAW protocol. This makes it
possible to add traffic control filters based on the fwmark.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221210113653.170346-1-mkl@pengutronix.de
Acked-by: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>
Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>

show more ...

can: raw: add CAN XL support

Enable CAN_RAW sockets to read and write CAN XL frames analogue to the
CAN FD extension (new CAN_RAW_XL_FRAMES sockopt).

A CAN XL network interface is capable to handle

can: raw: add CAN XL support

Enable CAN_RAW sockets to read and write CAN XL frames analogue to the
CAN FD extension (new CAN_RAW_XL_FRAMES sockopt).

A CAN XL network interface is capable to handle Classical CAN, CAN FD and
CAN XL frames. When CAN_RAW_XL_FRAMES is enabled, the CAN_RAW socket checks
whether the addressed CAN network interface is capable to handle the
provided CAN frame.

In opposite to the fixed number of bytes for
- CAN frames (CAN_MTU = sizeof(struct can_frame))
- CAN FD frames (CANFD_MTU = sizeof(struct can_frame))
the number of bytes when reading/writing CAN XL frames depends on the
number of data bytes. For efficiency reasons the length of the struct
canxl_frame is truncated to the needed size for read/write operations.
This leads to a calculated size of CANXL_HDR_SIZE + canxl_frame::len which
is enforced on write() operations and guaranteed on read() operations.

NB: Valid length values are 1 .. 2048 (CANXL_MIN_DLEN .. CANXL_MAX_DLEN).

Acked-by: Vincent Mailhol <mailhol.vincent@wanadoo.fr>
Signed-off-by: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220912170725.120748-8-socketcan@hartkopp.net
Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>

show more ...

can: raw: use guard clause to optimize nesting in raw_rcv()

We can use guard clause to optimize nesting codes like
if (condition) { ... } else { return; } in raw_rcv();

Signed-off-by: Ziyang Xuan <

can: raw: use guard clause to optimize nesting in raw_rcv()

We can use guard clause to optimize nesting codes like
if (condition) { ... } else { return; } in raw_rcv();

Signed-off-by: Ziyang Xuan <william.xuanziyang@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/0170ad1f07dbe838965df4274fce950980fa9d1f.1661584485.git.william.xuanziyang@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>

show more ...

can: raw: process optimization in raw_init()

Now, register notifier after register proto successfully. It can create
raw socket and set socket options once register proto successfully, so it
is poss

can: raw: process optimization in raw_init()

Now, register notifier after register proto successfully. It can create
raw socket and set socket options once register proto successfully, so it
is possible missing notifier event before register notifier successfully
although this is a low probability scenario.

Move notifier registration to the front of proto registration like done
in j1939. In addition, register_netdevice_notifier() may fail, check its
result is necessary.

Signed-off-by: Ziyang Xuan <william.xuanziyang@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/7af9401f0d2d9fed36c1667b5ac9b8df8f8b87ee.1661584485.git.william.xuanziyang@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>

show more ...

can: raw: add support for SO_TXTIME/SCM_TXTIME

This patch calls into sock_cmsg_send() to parse the user supplied
control information into a struct sockcm_cookie. Then assign the
requested transmit t

can: raw: add support for SO_TXTIME/SCM_TXTIME

This patch calls into sock_cmsg_send() to parse the user supplied
control information into a struct sockcm_cookie. Then assign the
requested transmit time to the skb.

This makes it possible to use the Earliest TXTIME First (ETF) packet
scheduler with the CAN_RAW protocol. The user can send a CAN_RAW frame
with a TXTIME and the kernel (with the ETF scheduler) will take care
of sending it to the network interface.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220502091946.1916211-3-mkl@pengutronix.de
Acked-by: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>
Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>

show more ...

can: raw: raw_sendmsg(): remove not needed setting of skb->sk

The skb in raw_sendmsg() is allocated with sock_alloc_send_skb(),
which subsequently calls sock_alloc_send_pskb() -> skb_set_owner_w(),

can: raw: raw_sendmsg(): remove not needed setting of skb->sk

The skb in raw_sendmsg() is allocated with sock_alloc_send_skb(),
which subsequently calls sock_alloc_send_pskb() -> skb_set_owner_w(),
which assigns "skb->sk = sk".

This patch removes the not needed setting of skb->sk.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220502091946.1916211-2-mkl@pengutronix.de
Acked-by: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>
Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>

show more ...

net: SO_RCVMARK socket option for SO_MARK with recvmsg()

Adding a new socket option, SO_RCVMARK, to indicate that SO_MARK
should be included in the ancillary data returned by recvmsg().

Renamed the

net: SO_RCVMARK socket option for SO_MARK with recvmsg()

Adding a new socket option, SO_RCVMARK, to indicate that SO_MARK
should be included in the ancillary data returned by recvmsg().

Renamed the sock_recv_ts_and_drops() function to sock_recv_cmsgs().

Signed-off-by: Erin MacNeil <lnx.erin@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220427200259.2564-1-lnx.erin@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>

show more ...

net: remove noblock parameter from skb_recv_datagram()

skb_recv_datagram() has two parameters 'flags' and 'noblock' that are
merged inside skb_recv_datagram() by 'flags | (noblock ? MSG_DONTWAIT : 0

net: remove noblock parameter from skb_recv_datagram()

skb_recv_datagram() has two parameters 'flags' and 'noblock' that are
merged inside skb_recv_datagram() by 'flags | (noblock ? MSG_DONTWAIT : 0)'

As 'flags' may contain MSG_DONTWAIT as value most callers split the 'flags'
into 'flags' and 'noblock' with finally obsolete bit operations like this:

skb_recv_datagram(sk, flags & ~MSG_DONTWAIT, flags & MSG_DONTWAIT, &rc);

And this is not even done consistently with the 'flags' parameter.

This patch removes the obsolete and costly splitting into two parameters
and only performs bit operations when really needed on the caller side.

One missing conversion thankfully reported by kernel test robot. I missed
to enable kunit tests to build the mctp code.

Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

show more ...

net: Remove redundant if statements

The 'if (dev)' statement already move into dev_{put , hold}, so remove
redundant if statements.

Signed-off-by: Yajun Deng <yajun.deng@linux.dev>
Signed-off-by: D

net: Remove redundant if statements

The 'if (dev)' statement already move into dev_{put , hold}, so remove
redundant if statements.

Signed-off-by: Yajun Deng <yajun.deng@linux.dev>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

show more ...

can: raw: raw_setsockopt(): fix raw_rcv panic for sock UAF

We get a bug during ltp can_filter test as following.

===========================================
[60919.264984] BUG: unable to handle ker

can: raw: raw_setsockopt(): fix raw_rcv panic for sock UAF

We get a bug during ltp can_filter test as following.

===========================================
[60919.264984] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000010
[60919.265223] PGD 8000003dda726067 P4D 8000003dda726067 PUD 3dda727067 PMD 0
[60919.265443] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI
[60919.265550] CPU: 30 PID: 3638365 Comm: can_filter Kdump: loaded Tainted: G W 4.19.90+ #1
[60919.266068] RIP: 0010:selinux_socket_sock_rcv_skb+0x3e/0x200
[60919.293289] RSP: 0018:ffff8d53bfc03cf8 EFLAGS: 00010246
[60919.307140] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 000000000000001d RCX: 0000000000000007
[60919.320756] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: ffff8d5104a8ed00 RDI: ffff8d53bfc03d30
[60919.334319] RBP: ffff8d9338056800 R08: ffff8d53bfc29d80 R09: 0000000000000001
[60919.347969] R10: ffff8d53bfc03ec0 R11: ffffb8526ef47c98 R12: ffff8d53bfc03d30
[60919.350320] perf: interrupt took too long (3063 > 2500), lowering kernel.perf_event_max_sample_rate to 65000
[60919.361148] R13: 0000000000000001 R14: ffff8d53bcf90000 R15: 0000000000000000
[60919.361151] FS: 00007fb78b6b3600(0000) GS:ffff8d53bfc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[60919.400812] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[60919.413730] CR2: 0000000000000010 CR3: 0000003e3f784006 CR4: 00000000007606e0
[60919.426479] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
[60919.439339] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
[60919.451608] PKRU: 55555554
[60919.463622] Call Trace:
[60919.475617] <IRQ>
[60919.487122] ? update_load_avg+0x89/0x5d0
[60919.498478] ? update_load_avg+0x89/0x5d0
[60919.509822] ? account_entity_enqueue+0xc5/0xf0
[60919.520709] security_sock_rcv_skb+0x2a/0x40
[60919.531413] sk_filter_trim_cap+0x47/0x1b0
[60919.542178] ? kmem_cache_alloc+0x38/0x1b0
[60919.552444] sock_queue_rcv_skb+0x17/0x30
[60919.562477] raw_rcv+0x110/0x190 [can_raw]
[60919.572539] can_rcv_filter+0xbc/0x1b0 [can]
[60919.582173] can_receive+0x6b/0xb0 [can]
[60919.591595] can_rcv+0x31/0x70 [can]
[60919.600783] __netif_receive_skb_one_core+0x5a/0x80
[60919.609864] process_backlog+0x9b/0x150
[60919.618691] net_rx_action+0x156/0x400
[60919.627310] ? sched_clock_cpu+0xc/0xa0
[60919.635714] __do_softirq+0xe8/0x2e9
[60919.644161] do_softirq_own_stack+0x2a/0x40
[60919.652154] </IRQ>
[60919.659899] do_softirq.part.17+0x4f/0x60
[60919.667475] __local_bh_enable_ip+0x60/0x70
[60919.675089] __dev_queue_xmit+0x539/0x920
[60919.682267] ? finish_wait+0x80/0x80
[60919.689218] ? finish_wait+0x80/0x80
[60919.695886] ? sock_alloc_send_pskb+0x211/0x230
[60919.702395] ? can_send+0xe5/0x1f0 [can]
[60919.708882] can_send+0xe5/0x1f0 [can]
[60919.715037] raw_sendmsg+0x16d/0x268 [can_raw]

It's because raw_setsockopt() concurrently with
unregister_netdevice_many(). Concurrent scenario as following.

cpu0 cpu1
raw_bind
raw_setsockopt unregister_netdevice_many
unlist_netdevice
dev_get_by_index raw_notifier
raw_enable_filters ......
can_rx_register
can_rcv_list_find(..., net->can.rx_alldev_list)

......

sock_close
raw_release(sock_a)

......

can_receive
can_rcv_filter(net->can.rx_alldev_list, ...)
raw_rcv(skb, sock_a)
BUG

After unlist_netdevice(), dev_get_by_index() return NULL in
raw_setsockopt(). Function raw_enable_filters() will add sock
and can_filter to net->can.rx_alldev_list. Then the sock is closed.
Followed by, we sock_sendmsg() to a new vcan device use the same
can_filter. Protocol stack match the old receiver whose sock has
been released on net->can.rx_alldev_list in can_rcv_filter().
Function raw_rcv() uses the freed sock. UAF BUG is triggered.

We can find that the key issue is that net_device has not been
protected in raw_setsockopt(). Use rtnl_lock to protect net_device
in raw_setsockopt().

Fixes: c18ce101f2e4 ("[CAN]: Add raw protocol")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210722070819.1048263-1-william.xuanziyang@huawei.com
Cc: linux-stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Ziyang Xuan <william.xuanziyang@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>
Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>

show more ...

net: sock: introduce sk_error_report

This patch introduces a function wrapper to call the sk_error_report
callback. That will prepare to add additional handling whenever
sk_error_report is called, f

net: sock: introduce sk_error_report

This patch introduces a function wrapper to call the sk_error_report
callback. That will prepare to add additional handling whenever
sk_error_report is called, for example to trace socket errors.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

show more ...

can: bcm/raw/isotp: use per module netdevice notifier

syzbot is reporting hung task at register_netdevice_notifier() [1] and
unregister_netdevice_notifier() [2], for cleanup_net() might perform
time

can: bcm/raw/isotp: use per module netdevice notifier

syzbot is reporting hung task at register_netdevice_notifier() [1] and
unregister_netdevice_notifier() [2], for cleanup_net() might perform
time consuming operations while CAN driver's raw/bcm/isotp modules are
calling {register,unregister}_netdevice_notifier() on each socket.

Change raw/bcm/isotp modules to call register_netdevice_notifier() from
module's __init function and call unregister_netdevice_notifier() from
module's __exit function, as with gw/j1939 modules are doing.

Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=391b9498827788b3cc6830226d4ff5be87107c30 [1]
Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=1724d278c83ca6e6df100a2e320c10d991cf2bce [2]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/54a5f451-05ed-f977-8534-79e7aa2bcc8f@i-love.sakura.ne.jp
Cc: linux-stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Reported-by: syzbot <syzbot+355f8edb2ff45d5f95fa@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
Reported-by: syzbot <syzbot+0f1827363a305f74996f@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com>
Tested-by: syzbot <syzbot+355f8edb2ff45d5f95fa@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
Tested-by: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>
Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>

show more ...

can: bcm/raw: fix msg_namelen values depending on CAN_REQUIRED_SIZE

Since commit f5223e9eee65 ("can: extend sockaddr_can to include j1939
members") the sockaddr_can has been extended in size and a n

can: bcm/raw: fix msg_namelen values depending on CAN_REQUIRED_SIZE

Since commit f5223e9eee65 ("can: extend sockaddr_can to include j1939
members") the sockaddr_can has been extended in size and a new
CAN_REQUIRED_SIZE macro has been introduced to calculate the protocol
specific needed size.

The ABI for the msg_name and msg_namelen has not been adapted to the
new CAN_REQUIRED_SIZE macro for the other CAN protocols which leads to
a problem when an existing binary reads the (increased) struct
sockaddr_can in msg_name.

Fixes: f5223e9eee65 ("can: extend sockaddr_can to include j1939 members")
Reported-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Tested-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Acked-by: Kurt Van Dijck <dev.kurt@vandijck-laurijssen.be>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-can/1135648123.112255.1616613706554.JavaMail.zimbra@nod.at/T/#t
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210325125850.1620-1-socketcan@hartkopp.net
Signed-off-by: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>
Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>

show more ...

can: raw: return -ERANGE when filterset does not fit into user space buffer

Multiple filters (struct can_filter) can be set with the setsockopt()
function, which was originally intended as a write-o

can: raw: return -ERANGE when filterset does not fit into user space buffer

Multiple filters (struct can_filter) can be set with the setsockopt()
function, which was originally intended as a write-only operation.

As getsockopt() also provides a CAN_RAW_FILTER option to read back the
given filters, the caller has to provide an appropriate user space buffer.
In the case this buffer is too small the getsockopt() silently truncates
the filter information and gives no information about the needed space.
This is safe but not convenient for the programmer.

In net/core/sock.c the SO_PEERGROUPS sockopt had a similar requirement
and solved it by returning -ERANGE in the case that the provided data
does not fit into the given user space buffer and fills the required size
into optlen, so that the caller can retry with a matching buffer length.

This patch adopts this approach for CAN_RAW_FILTER getsockopt().

Reported-by: Phillip Schichtel <phillip@schich.tel>
Signed-off-by: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>
Tested-By: Phillip Schichtel <phillip@schich.tel>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201216174928.21663-1-socketcan@hartkopp.net
Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>

show more ...

can: raw: raw_setsockopt(): fix raw_rcv panic for sock UAF

commit 54f93336d000229f72c26d8a3f69dd256b744528 upstream.

We get a bug during ltp can_filter test as following.

=========================

can: raw: raw_setsockopt(): fix raw_rcv panic for sock UAF

commit 54f93336d000229f72c26d8a3f69dd256b744528 upstream.

We get a bug during ltp can_filter test as following.

===========================================
[60919.264984] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000010
[60919.265223] PGD 8000003dda726067 P4D 8000003dda726067 PUD 3dda727067 PMD 0
[60919.265443] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI
[60919.265550] CPU: 30 PID: 3638365 Comm: can_filter Kdump: loaded Tainted: G W 4.19.90+ #1
[60919.266068] RIP: 0010:selinux_socket_sock_rcv_skb+0x3e/0x200
[60919.293289] RSP: 0018:ffff8d53bfc03cf8 EFLAGS: 00010246
[60919.307140] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 000000000000001d RCX: 0000000000000007
[60919.320756] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: ffff8d5104a8ed00 RDI: ffff8d53bfc03d30
[60919.334319] RBP: ffff8d9338056800 R08: ffff8d53bfc29d80 R09: 0000000000000001
[60919.347969] R10: ffff8d53bfc03ec0 R11: ffffb8526ef47c98 R12: ffff8d53bfc03d30
[60919.350320] perf: interrupt took too long (3063 > 2500), lowering kernel.perf_event_max_sample_rate to 65000
[60919.361148] R13: 0000000000000001 R14: ffff8d53bcf90000 R15: 0000000000000000
[60919.361151] FS: 00007fb78b6b3600(0000) GS:ffff8d53bfc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[60919.400812] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[60919.413730] CR2: 0000000000000010 CR3: 0000003e3f784006 CR4: 00000000007606e0
[60919.426479] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
[60919.439339] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
[60919.451608] PKRU: 55555554
[60919.463622] Call Trace:
[60919.475617] <IRQ>
[60919.487122] ? update_load_avg+0x89/0x5d0
[60919.498478] ? update_load_avg+0x89/0x5d0
[60919.509822] ? account_entity_enqueue+0xc5/0xf0
[60919.520709] security_sock_rcv_skb+0x2a/0x40
[60919.531413] sk_filter_trim_cap+0x47/0x1b0
[60919.542178] ? kmem_cache_alloc+0x38/0x1b0
[60919.552444] sock_queue_rcv_skb+0x17/0x30
[60919.562477] raw_rcv+0x110/0x190 [can_raw]
[60919.572539] can_rcv_filter+0xbc/0x1b0 [can]
[60919.582173] can_receive+0x6b/0xb0 [can]
[60919.591595] can_rcv+0x31/0x70 [can]
[60919.600783] __netif_receive_skb_one_core+0x5a/0x80
[60919.609864] process_backlog+0x9b/0x150
[60919.618691] net_rx_action+0x156/0x400
[60919.627310] ? sched_clock_cpu+0xc/0xa0
[60919.635714] __do_softirq+0xe8/0x2e9
[60919.644161] do_softirq_own_stack+0x2a/0x40
[60919.652154] </IRQ>
[60919.659899] do_softirq.part.17+0x4f/0x60
[60919.667475] __local_bh_enable_ip+0x60/0x70
[60919.675089] __dev_queue_xmit+0x539/0x920
[60919.682267] ? finish_wait+0x80/0x80
[60919.689218] ? finish_wait+0x80/0x80
[60919.695886] ? sock_alloc_send_pskb+0x211/0x230
[60919.702395] ? can_send+0xe5/0x1f0 [can]
[60919.708882] can_send+0xe5/0x1f0 [can]
[60919.715037] raw_sendmsg+0x16d/0x268 [can_raw]

It's because raw_setsockopt() concurrently with
unregister_netdevice_many(). Concurrent scenario as following.

cpu0 cpu1
raw_bind
raw_setsockopt unregister_netdevice_many
unlist_netdevice
dev_get_by_index raw_notifier
raw_enable_filters ......
can_rx_register
can_rcv_list_find(..., net->can.rx_alldev_list)

......

sock_close
raw_release(sock_a)

......

can_receive
can_rcv_filter(net->can.rx_alldev_list, ...)
raw_rcv(skb, sock_a)
BUG

After unlist_netdevice(), dev_get_by_index() return NULL in
raw_setsockopt(). Function raw_enable_filters() will add sock
and can_filter to net->can.rx_alldev_list. Then the sock is closed.
Followed by, we sock_sendmsg() to a new vcan device use the same
can_filter. Protocol stack match the old receiver whose sock has
been released on net->can.rx_alldev_list in can_rcv_filter().
Function raw_rcv() uses the freed sock. UAF BUG is triggered.

We can find that the key issue is that net_device has not been
protected in raw_setsockopt(). Use rtnl_lock to protect net_device
in raw_setsockopt().

Fixes: c18ce101f2e4 ("[CAN]: Add raw protocol")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210722070819.1048263-1-william.xuanziyang@huawei.com
Cc: linux-stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Ziyang Xuan <william.xuanziyang@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>
Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

show more ...

can: bcm/raw/isotp: use per module netdevice notifier

commit 8d0caedb759683041d9db82069937525999ada53 upstream.

syzbot is reporting hung task at register_netdevice_notifier() [1] and
unregister_net

can: bcm/raw/isotp: use per module netdevice notifier

commit 8d0caedb759683041d9db82069937525999ada53 upstream.

syzbot is reporting hung task at register_netdevice_notifier() [1] and
unregister_netdevice_notifier() [2], for cleanup_net() might perform
time consuming operations while CAN driver's raw/bcm/isotp modules are
calling {register,unregister}_netdevice_notifier() on each socket.

Change raw/bcm/isotp modules to call register_netdevice_notifier() from
module's __init function and call unregister_netdevice_notifier() from
module's __exit function, as with gw/j1939 modules are doing.

Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=391b9498827788b3cc6830226d4ff5be87107c30 [1]
Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=1724d278c83ca6e6df100a2e320c10d991cf2bce [2]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/54a5f451-05ed-f977-8534-79e7aa2bcc8f@i-love.sakura.ne.jp
Cc: linux-stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Reported-by: syzbot <syzbot+355f8edb2ff45d5f95fa@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
Reported-by: syzbot <syzbot+0f1827363a305f74996f@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com>
Tested-by: syzbot <syzbot+355f8edb2ff45d5f95fa@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
Tested-by: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>
Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

show more ...

can: bcm/raw: fix msg_namelen values depending on CAN_REQUIRED_SIZE

[ Upstream commit 9e9714742fb70467464359693a73b911a630226f ]

Since commit f5223e9eee65 ("can: extend sockaddr_can to include j193

can: bcm/raw: fix msg_namelen values depending on CAN_REQUIRED_SIZE

[ Upstream commit 9e9714742fb70467464359693a73b911a630226f ]

Since commit f5223e9eee65 ("can: extend sockaddr_can to include j1939
members") the sockaddr_can has been extended in size and a new
CAN_REQUIRED_SIZE macro has been introduced to calculate the protocol
specific needed size.

The ABI for the msg_name and msg_namelen has not been adapted to the
new CAN_REQUIRED_SIZE macro for the other CAN protocols which leads to
a problem when an existing binary reads the (increased) struct
sockaddr_can in msg_name.

Fixes: f5223e9eee65 ("can: extend sockaddr_can to include j1939 members")
Reported-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Tested-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Acked-by: Kurt Van Dijck <dev.kurt@vandijck-laurijssen.be>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-can/1135648123.112255.1616613706554.JavaMail.zimbra@nod.at/T/#t
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210325125850.1620-1-socketcan@hartkopp.net
Signed-off-by: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>
Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

show more ...

can: remove obsolete version strings

As pointed out by Jakub Kicinski here:
http://lore.kernel.org/r/20201009175751.5c54097f@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com
this patch removes the obso

can: remove obsolete version strings

As pointed out by Jakub Kicinski here:
http://lore.kernel.org/r/20201009175751.5c54097f@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com
this patch removes the obsolete version information of the different
CAN protocols and the AF_CAN core module.

Signed-off-by: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201012074354.25839-2-socketcan@hartkopp.net
Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>

show more ...