mm, memory_hotplug: test_pages_in_a_zone do not pass the end of zone

If memory end is not aligned with the sparse memory section boundary,
the mapping of such a section is only partly initialized.

mm, memory_hotplug: test_pages_in_a_zone do not pass the end of zone

If memory end is not aligned with the sparse memory section boundary,
the mapping of such a section is only partly initialized. This may lead
to VM_BUG_ON due to uninitialized struct pages access from
test_pages_in_a_zone() function triggered by memory_hotplug sysfs
handlers.

Here are the the panic examples:
CONFIG_DEBUG_VM_PGFLAGS=y
kernel parameter mem=2050M
--------------------------
page:000003d082008000 is uninitialized and poisoned
page dumped because: VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PagePoisoned(p))
Call Trace:
test_pages_in_a_zone+0xde/0x160
show_valid_zones+0x5c/0x190
dev_attr_show+0x34/0x70
sysfs_kf_seq_show+0xc8/0x148
seq_read+0x204/0x480
__vfs_read+0x32/0x178
vfs_read+0x82/0x138
ksys_read+0x5a/0xb0
system_call+0xdc/0x2d8
Last Breaking-Event-Address:
test_pages_in_a_zone+0xde/0x160
Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception: panic_on_oops

Fix this by checking whether the pfn to check is within the zone.

[mhocko@suse.com: separated this change from http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181105150401.97287-2-zaslonko@linux.ibm.com]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190128144506.15603-3-mhocko@kernel.org

[mhocko@suse.com: separated this change from
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181105150401.97287-2-zaslonko@linux.ibm.com]
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Mikhail Zaslonko <zaslonko@linux.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Mikhail Gavrilov <mikhail.v.gavrilov@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Tested-by: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Mikhail Gavrilov <mikhail.v.gavrilov@gmail.com>
Cc: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

show more ...

mm, memory_hotplug: is_mem_section_removable do not pass the end of a zone

Patch series "mm, memory_hotplug: fix uninitialized pages fallouts", v2.

Mikhail Zaslonko has posted fixes for the two bug

mm, memory_hotplug: is_mem_section_removable do not pass the end of a zone

Patch series "mm, memory_hotplug: fix uninitialized pages fallouts", v2.

Mikhail Zaslonko has posted fixes for the two bugs quite some time ago
[1]. I have pushed back on those fixes because I believed that it is
much better to plug the problem at the initialization time rather than
play whack-a-mole all over the hotplug code and find all the places
which expect the full memory section to be initialized.

We have ended up with commit 2830bf6f05fb ("mm, memory_hotplug:
initialize struct pages for the full memory section") merged and cause a
regression [2][3]. The reason is that there might be memory layouts
when two NUMA nodes share the same memory section so the merged fix is
simply incorrect.

In order to plug this hole we really have to be zone range aware in
those handlers. I have split up the original patch into two. One is
unchanged (patch 2) and I took a different approach for `removable'
crash.

[1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181105150401.97287-2-zaslonko@linux.ibm.com
[2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1666948
[3] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190125163938.GA20411@dhcp22.suse.cz

This patch (of 2):

Mikhail has reported the following VM_BUG_ON triggered when reading sysfs
removable state of a memory block:

page:000003d08300c000 is uninitialized and poisoned
page dumped because: VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PagePoisoned(p))
Call Trace:
is_mem_section_removable+0xb4/0x190
show_mem_removable+0x9a/0xd8
dev_attr_show+0x34/0x70
sysfs_kf_seq_show+0xc8/0x148
seq_read+0x204/0x480
__vfs_read+0x32/0x178
vfs_read+0x82/0x138
ksys_read+0x5a/0xb0
system_call+0xdc/0x2d8
Last Breaking-Event-Address:
is_mem_section_removable+0xb4/0x190
Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception: panic_on_oops

The reason is that the memory block spans the zone boundary and we are
stumbling over an unitialized struct page. Fix this by enforcing zone
range in is_mem_section_removable so that we never run away from a zone.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190128144506.15603-2-mhocko@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Reported-by: Mikhail Zaslonko <zaslonko@linux.ibm.com>
Debugged-by: Mikhail Zaslonko <zaslonko@linux.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Mikhail Gavrilov <mikhail.v.gavrilov@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

show more ...

mm, memory_hotplug: don't bail out in do_migrate_range() prematurely

do_migrate_range() takes a memory range and tries to isolate the pages
to put them into a list. This list will be later on used

mm, memory_hotplug: don't bail out in do_migrate_range() prematurely

do_migrate_range() takes a memory range and tries to isolate the pages
to put them into a list. This list will be later on used in
migrate_pages() to know the pages we need to migrate.

Currently, if we fail to isolate a single page, we put all already
isolated pages back to their LRU and we bail out from the function.
This is quite suboptimal, as this will force us to start over again
because scan_movable_pages will give us the same range. If there is no
chance that we can isolate that page, we will loop here forever.

Issue debugged in [1] has proved that. During the debugging of that
issue, it was noticed that if do_migrate_ranges() fails to isolate a
single page, we will just discard the work we have done so far and bail
out, which means that scan_movable_pages() will find again the same set
of pages.

Instead, we can just skip the error, keep isolating as much pages as
possible and then proceed with the call to migrate_pages().

This will allow us to do as much work as possible at once.

[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/12/6/324

Michal said:

: I still think that this doesn't give us a whole picture. Looping for
: ever is a bug. Failing the isolation is quite possible and it should
: be a ephemeral condition (e.g. a race with freeing the page or
: somebody else isolating the page for whatever reason). And here comes
: the disadvantage of the current implementation. We simply throw
: everything on the floor just because of a ephemeral condition. The
: racy page_count check is quite dubious to prevent from that.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181211135312.27034-1-osalvador@suse.de
Signed-off-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@gmail.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: William Kucharski <william.kucharski@oracle.com>
Cc: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

show more ...

mm, memory_hotplug: deobfuscate migration part of offlining

Memory migration might fail during offlining and we keep retrying in that
case. This is currently obfuscated by goto retry loop. The cod

mm, memory_hotplug: deobfuscate migration part of offlining

Memory migration might fail during offlining and we keep retrying in that
case. This is currently obfuscated by goto retry loop. The code is hard
to follow and as a result it is even suboptimal becase each retry round
scans the full range from start_pfn even though we have successfully
scanned/migrated [start_pfn, pfn] range already. This is all only because
check_pages_isolated failure has to rescan the full range again.

De-obfuscate the migration retry loop by promoting it to a real for loop.
In fact remove the goto altogether by making it a proper double loop
(yeah, gotos are nasty in this specific case). In the end we will get a
slightly more optimal code which is better readable.

[akpm@linux-foundation.org: reflow comments to 80 cols]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181211142741.2607-3-mhocko@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
Cc: William Kucharski <william.kucharski@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

show more ...

mm, memory_hotplug: try to migrate full pfn range

Patch series "few memory offlining enhancements".

I have been chasing memory offlining not making progress recently. On the
way I have noticed few

mm, memory_hotplug: try to migrate full pfn range

Patch series "few memory offlining enhancements".

I have been chasing memory offlining not making progress recently. On the
way I have noticed few weird decisions in the code. The migration itself
is restricted without a reasonable justification and the retry loop around
the migration is quite messy. This is addressed by patch 1 and patch 2.

Patch 3 is targeting on the faultaround code which has been a hot
candidate for the initial issue reported upstream [2] and that I am
debugging internally. It turned out to be not the main contributor in the
end but I believe we should address it regardless. See the patch
description for more details.

[1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181120134323.13007-1-mhocko@kernel.org
[2] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181114070909.GB2653@MiWiFi-R3L-srv

This patch (of 3):

do_migrate_range has been limiting the number of pages to migrate to 256
for some reason which is not documented. Even if the limit made some
sense back then when it was introduced it doesn't really serve a good
purpose these days. If the range contains huge pages then we break out of
the loop too early and go through LRU and pcp caches draining and
scan_movable_pages is quite suboptimal.

The only reason to limit the number of pages I can think of is to reduce
the potential time to react on the fatal signal. But even then the number
of pages is a questionable metric because even a single page migration
might block in a non-killable state (e.g. __unmap_and_move).

Remove the limit and offline the full requested range (this is one
memblock worth of pages with the current code). Should we ever get a
report that offlining takes too long to react on fatal signal then we
should rather fix the core migration to use killable waits and bailout
on a signal.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181211142741.2607-1-mhocko@kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181211142741.2607-2-mhocko@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: William Kucharski <william.kucharski@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

show more ...

hwpoison, memory_hotplug: allow hwpoisoned pages to be offlined

We have received a bug report that an injected MCE about faulty memory
prevents memory offline to succeed on 4.4 base kernel. The und

hwpoison, memory_hotplug: allow hwpoisoned pages to be offlined

We have received a bug report that an injected MCE about faulty memory
prevents memory offline to succeed on 4.4 base kernel. The underlying
reason was that the HWPoison page has an elevated reference count and the
migration keeps failing. There are two problems with that. First of all
it is dubious to migrate the poisoned page because we know that accessing
that memory is possible to fail. Secondly it doesn't make any sense to
migrate a potentially broken content and preserve the memory corruption
over to a new location.

Oscar has found out that 4.4 and the current upstream kernels behave
slightly differently with his simply testcase

===

int main(void)
{
int ret;
int i;
int fd;
char *array = malloc(4096);
char *array_locked = malloc(4096);

fd = open("/tmp/data", O_RDONLY);
read(fd, array, 4095);

for (i = 0; i < 4096; i++)
array_locked[i] = 'd';

ret = mlock((void *)PAGE_ALIGN((unsigned long)array_locked), sizeof(array_locked));
if (ret)
perror("mlock");

sleep (20);

ret = madvise((void *)PAGE_ALIGN((unsigned long)array_locked), 4096, MADV_HWPOISON);
if (ret)
perror("madvise");

for (i = 0; i < 4096; i++)
array_locked[i] = 'd';

return 0;
}
===

+ offline this memory.

In 4.4 kernels he saw the hwpoisoned page to be returned back to the LRU
list
kernel: [<ffffffff81019ac9>] dump_trace+0x59/0x340
kernel: [<ffffffff81019e9a>] show_stack_log_lvl+0xea/0x170
kernel: [<ffffffff8101ac71>] show_stack+0x21/0x40
kernel: [<ffffffff8132bb90>] dump_stack+0x5c/0x7c
kernel: [<ffffffff810815a1>] warn_slowpath_common+0x81/0xb0
kernel: [<ffffffff811a275c>] __pagevec_lru_add_fn+0x14c/0x160
kernel: [<ffffffff811a2eed>] pagevec_lru_move_fn+0xad/0x100
kernel: [<ffffffff811a334c>] __lru_cache_add+0x6c/0xb0
kernel: [<ffffffff81195236>] add_to_page_cache_lru+0x46/0x70
kernel: [<ffffffffa02b4373>] extent_readpages+0xc3/0x1a0 [btrfs]
kernel: [<ffffffff811a16d7>] __do_page_cache_readahead+0x177/0x200
kernel: [<ffffffff811a18c8>] ondemand_readahead+0x168/0x2a0
kernel: [<ffffffff8119673f>] generic_file_read_iter+0x41f/0x660
kernel: [<ffffffff8120e50d>] __vfs_read+0xcd/0x140
kernel: [<ffffffff8120e9ea>] vfs_read+0x7a/0x120
kernel: [<ffffffff8121404b>] kernel_read+0x3b/0x50
kernel: [<ffffffff81215c80>] do_execveat_common.isra.29+0x490/0x6f0
kernel: [<ffffffff81215f08>] do_execve+0x28/0x30
kernel: [<ffffffff81095ddb>] call_usermodehelper_exec_async+0xfb/0x130
kernel: [<ffffffff8161c045>] ret_from_fork+0x55/0x80

And that latter confuses the hotremove path because an LRU page is
attempted to be migrated and that fails due to an elevated reference
count. It is quite possible that the reuse of the HWPoisoned page is some
kind of fixed race condition but I am not really sure about that.

With the upstream kernel the failure is slightly different. The page
doesn't seem to have LRU bit set but isolate_movable_page simply fails and
do_migrate_range simply puts all the isolated pages back to LRU and
therefore no progress is made and scan_movable_pages finds same set of
pages over and over again.

Fix both cases by explicitly checking HWPoisoned pages before we even try
to get reference on the page, try to unmap it if it is still mapped. As
explained by Naoya:

: Hwpoison code never unmapped those for no big reason because
: Ksm pages never dominate memory, so we simply didn't have strong
: motivation to save the pages.

Also put WARN_ON(PageLRU) in case there is a race and we can hit LRU
HWPoison pages which shouldn't happen but I couldn't convince myself about
that. Naoya has noted the following:

: Theoretically no such gurantee, because try_to_unmap() doesn't have a
: guarantee of success and then memory_failure() returns immediately
: when hwpoison_user_mappings fails.
: Or the following code (comes after hwpoison_user_mappings block) also impli=
: es
: that the target page can still have PageLRU flag.
:
: /*
: * Torn down by someone else?
: */
: if (PageLRU(p) && !PageSwapCache(p) && p->mapping =3D=3D NULL) {
: action_result(pfn, MF_MSG_TRUNCATED_LRU, MF_IGNORED);
: res =3D -EBUSY;
: goto out;
: }
:
: So I think it's OK to keep "if (WARN_ON(PageLRU(page)))" block in
: current version of your patch.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181206120135.14079-1-mhocko@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.com>
Debugged-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.com>
Tested-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.com>
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

show more ...

mm, hotplug: move init_currently_empty_zone() under zone_span_lock protection

During online_pages phase, pgdat->nr_zones will be updated in case this
zone is empty.

Currently the online_pages phase

mm, hotplug: move init_currently_empty_zone() under zone_span_lock protection

During online_pages phase, pgdat->nr_zones will be updated in case this
zone is empty.

Currently the online_pages phase is protected by the global locks
(device_device_hotplug_lock and mem_hotplug_lock), which ensures there is
no contention during the update of nr_zones.

These global locks introduces scalability issues (especially the second
one), which slow down code relying on get_online_mems(). This is also a
preparation for not having to rely on get_online_mems() but instead some
more fine grained locks.

The patch moves init_currently_empty_zone under both zone_span_writelock
and pgdat_resize_lock because both the pgdat state is changed (nr_zones)
and the zone's start_pfn. Also this patch changes the documentation of
node_size_lock to include the protection of nr_zones.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181203205016.14123-1-richard.weiyang@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

show more ...

mm, sparse: pass nid instead of pgdat to sparse_add_one_section()

Since the information needed in sparse_add_one_section() is node id to
allocate proper memory, it is not necessary to pass its pgdat

mm, sparse: pass nid instead of pgdat to sparse_add_one_section()

Since the information needed in sparse_add_one_section() is node id to
allocate proper memory, it is not necessary to pass its pgdat.

This patch changes the prototype of sparse_add_one_section() to pass node
id directly. This is intended to reduce misleading that
sparse_add_one_section() would touch pgdat.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181204085657.20472-2-richard.weiyang@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

show more ...

mm, memory_hotplug: add nid parameter to arch_remove_memory

Patch series "Do not touch pages in hot-remove path", v2.

This patchset aims for two things:

1) A better definition about offline and h

mm, memory_hotplug: add nid parameter to arch_remove_memory

Patch series "Do not touch pages in hot-remove path", v2.

This patchset aims for two things:

1) A better definition about offline and hot-remove stage
2) Solving bugs where we can access non-initialized pages
during hot-remove operations [2] [3].

This is achieved by moving all page/zone handling to the offline
stage, so we do not need to access pages when hot-removing memory.

[1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/cover/10691415/
[2] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10547445/
[3] https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-mm/msg161316.html

This patch (of 5):

This is a preparation for the following-up patches. The idea of passing
the nid is that it will allow us to get rid of the zone parameter
afterwards.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181127162005.15833-2-osalvador@suse.de
Signed-off-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>

Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

show more ...

mm/memory_hotplug: drop "online" parameter from add_memory_resource()

Userspace should always be in charge of how to online memory and if memory
should be onlined automatically in the kernel. Let's

mm/memory_hotplug: drop "online" parameter from add_memory_resource()

Userspace should always be in charge of how to online memory and if memory
should be onlined automatically in the kernel. Let's drop the parameter
to overwrite this - XEN passes memhp_auto_online, just like add_memory(),
so we can directly use that instead internally.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181123123740.27652-1-david@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Acked-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
Cc: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@oracle.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Cc: Arun KS <arunks@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Mathieu Malaterre <malat@debian.org>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

show more ...

mm, memory_hotplug: do not clear numa_node association after hot_remove

Per-cpu numa_node provides a default node for each possible cpu. The
association gets initialized during the boot when the ar

mm, memory_hotplug: do not clear numa_node association after hot_remove

Per-cpu numa_node provides a default node for each possible cpu. The
association gets initialized during the boot when the architecture
specific code explores cpu->NUMA affinity. When the whole NUMA node is
removed though we are clearing this association

try_offline_node
check_and_unmap_cpu_on_node
unmap_cpu_on_node
numa_clear_node
numa_set_node(cpu, NUMA_NO_NODE)

This means that whoever calls cpu_to_node for a cpu associated with such a
node will get NUMA_NO_NODE. This is problematic for two reasons. First
it is fragile because __alloc_pages_node would simply blow up on an
out-of-bound access. We have encountered this when loading kvm module

BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 00000000000021c0
IP: __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x93/0xb70
PGD 800000ffe853e067 PUD 7336bbc067 PMD 0
Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP
[...]
CPU: 88 PID: 1223749 Comm: modprobe Tainted: G W 4.4.156-94.64-default #1
RIP: __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x93/0xb70
RSP: 0018:ffff887354493b40 EFLAGS: 00010202
RAX: 00000000000021c0 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000000
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000002 RDI: 00000000014000c0
RBP: 00000000014000c0 R08: ffffffffffffffff R09: 0000000000000000
R10: ffff88fffc89e790 R11: 0000000000014000 R12: 0000000000000101
R13: ffffffffa0772cd4 R14: ffffffffa0769ac0 R15: 0000000000000000
FS: 00007fdf2f2f1700(0000) GS:ffff88fffc880000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 00000000000021c0 CR3: 00000077205ee000 CR4: 0000000000360670
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Call Trace:
alloc_vmcs_cpu+0x3d/0x90 [kvm_intel]
hardware_setup+0x781/0x849 [kvm_intel]
kvm_arch_hardware_setup+0x28/0x190 [kvm]
kvm_init+0x7c/0x2d0 [kvm]
vmx_init+0x1e/0x32c [kvm_intel]
do_one_initcall+0xca/0x1f0
do_init_module+0x5a/0x1d7
load_module+0x1393/0x1c90
SYSC_finit_module+0x70/0xa0
entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1e/0xb7
DWARF2 unwinder stuck at entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1e/0xb7

on an older kernel but the code is basically the same in the current Linus
tree as well. alloc_vmcs_cpu could use alloc_pages_nodemask which would
recognize NUMA_NO_NODE and use alloc_pages_node which would translate it
to numa_mem_id but that is wrong as well because it would use a cpu
affinity of the local CPU which might be quite far from the original node.
It is also reasonable to expect that cpu_to_node will provide a sane
value and there might be many more callers like that.

The second problem is that __register_one_node relies on cpu_to_node to
properly associate cpus back to the node when it is onlined. We do not
want to lose that link as there is no arch independent way to get it from
the early boot time AFAICS.

Drop the whole check_and_unmap_cpu_on_node machinery and keep the
association to fix both issues. The NODE_DATA(nid) is not deallocated so
it will stay in place and if anybody wants to allocate from that node then
a fallback node will be used.

Thanks to Vlastimil Babka for his live system debugging skills that helped
debugging the issue.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181108100413.966-1-mhocko@kernel.org
Fixes: e13fe8695c57 ("cpu-hotplug,memory-hotplug: clear cpu_to_node() when offlining the node")
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Debugged-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Reported-by: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz>
Acked-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

show more ...

mm: only report isolation failures when offlining memory

Heiko has complained that his log is swamped by warnings from
has_unmovable_pages

[ 20.536664] page dumped because: has_unmovable_pages
[

mm: only report isolation failures when offlining memory

Heiko has complained that his log is swamped by warnings from
has_unmovable_pages

[ 20.536664] page dumped because: has_unmovable_pages
[ 20.536792] page:000003d081ff4080 count:1 mapcount:0 mapping:000000008ff88600 index:0x0 compound_mapcount: 0
[ 20.536794] flags: 0x3fffe0000010200(slab|head)
[ 20.536795] raw: 03fffe0000010200 0000000000000100 0000000000000200 000000008ff88600
[ 20.536796] raw: 0000000000000000 0020004100000000 ffffffff00000001 0000000000000000
[ 20.536797] page dumped because: has_unmovable_pages
[ 20.536814] page:000003d0823b0000 count:1 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x0
[ 20.536815] flags: 0x7fffe0000000000()
[ 20.536817] raw: 07fffe0000000000 0000000000000100 0000000000000200 0000000000000000
[ 20.536818] raw: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 ffffffff00000001 0000000000000000

which are not triggered by the memory hotplug but rather CMA allocator.
The original idea behind dumping the page state for all call paths was
that these messages will be helpful debugging failures. From the above it
seems that this is not the case for the CMA path because we are lacking
much more context. E.g the second reported page might be a CMA allocated
page. It is still interesting to see a slab page in the CMA area but it
is hard to tell whether this is bug from the above output alone.

Address this issue by dumping the page state only on request. Both
start_isolate_page_range and has_unmovable_pages already have an argument
to ignore hwpoison pages so make this argument more generic and turn it
into flags and allow callers to combine non-default modes into a mask.
While we are at it, has_unmovable_pages call from
is_pageblock_removable_nolock (sysfs removable file) is questionable to
report the failure so drop it from there as well.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181218092802.31429-1-mhocko@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Reported-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

show more ...

mm, memory_hotplug: be more verbose for memory offline failures

There is only very limited information printed when the memory offlining
fails:

[ 1984.506184] rac1 kernel: memory offlining [mem 0x8

mm, memory_hotplug: be more verbose for memory offline failures

There is only very limited information printed when the memory offlining
fails:

[ 1984.506184] rac1 kernel: memory offlining [mem 0x82600000000-0x8267fffffff] failed due to signal backoff

This tells us that the failure is triggered by the userspace intervention
but it doesn't tell us much more about the underlying reason. It might be
that the page migration failes repeatedly and the userspace timeout
expires and send a signal or it might be some of the earlier steps
(isolation, memory notifier) takes too long.

If the migration failes then it would be really helpful to see which page
that and its state. The same applies to the isolation phase. If we fail
to isolate a page from the allocator then knowing the state of the page
would be helpful as well.

Dump the page state that fails to get isolated or migrated. This will
tell us more about the failure and what to focus on during debugging.

[akpm@linux-foundation.org: add missing printk arg]
[mhocko@suse.com: tweak dump_page() `reason' text]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181116083020.20260-6-mhocko@kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181107101830.17405-6-mhocko@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Cc: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <OSalvador@suse.com>
Cc: William Kucharski <william.kucharski@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

show more ...

mm, memory_hotplug: print reason for the offlining failure

The memory offlining failure reporting is inconsistent and insufficient.
Some error paths simply do not report the failure to the log at al

mm, memory_hotplug: print reason for the offlining failure

The memory offlining failure reporting is inconsistent and insufficient.
Some error paths simply do not report the failure to the log at all. When
we do report there are no details about the reason of the failure and
there are several of them which makes memory offlining failures hard to
debug.

Make sure that the
memory offlining [mem %#010llx-%#010llx] failed
message is printed for all failures and also provide a short textual
reason for the failure e.g.

[ 1984.506184] rac1 kernel: memory offlining [mem 0x82600000000-0x8267fffffff] failed due to signal backoff

this tells us that the offlining has failed because of a signal pending
aka user intervention.

[akpm@linux-foundation.org: tweak messages a bit]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181107101830.17405-5-mhocko@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Cc: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <OSalvador@suse.com>
Cc: William Kucharski <william.kucharski@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

show more ...

mm, memory_hotplug: drop pointless block alignment checks from __offline_pages

This function is never called from a context which would provide
misaligned pfn range so drop the pointless check.

Lin

mm, memory_hotplug: drop pointless block alignment checks from __offline_pages

This function is never called from a context which would provide
misaligned pfn range so drop the pointless check.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181107101830.17405-4-mhocko@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Cc: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <OSalvador@suse.com>
Cc: William Kucharski <william.kucharski@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

show more ...

memory_hotplug: cond_resched in __remove_pages

We have received a bug report that unbinding a large pmem (>1TB) can
result in a soft lockup:

NMI watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#9 stuck for 23s!

memory_hotplug: cond_resched in __remove_pages

We have received a bug report that unbinding a large pmem (>1TB) can
result in a soft lockup:

NMI watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#9 stuck for 23s! [ndctl:4365]
[...]
Supported: Yes
CPU: 9 PID: 4365 Comm: ndctl Not tainted 4.12.14-94.40-default #1 SLE12-SP4
Hardware name: Intel Corporation S2600WFD/S2600WFD, BIOS SE5C620.86B.01.00.0833.051120182255 05/11/2018
task: ffff9cce7d4410c0 task.stack: ffffbe9eb1bc4000
RIP: 0010:__put_page+0x62/0x80
Call Trace:
devm_memremap_pages_release+0x152/0x260
release_nodes+0x18d/0x1d0
device_release_driver_internal+0x160/0x210
unbind_store+0xb3/0xe0
kernfs_fop_write+0x102/0x180
__vfs_write+0x26/0x150
vfs_write+0xad/0x1a0
SyS_write+0x42/0x90
do_syscall_64+0x74/0x150
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x3d/0xa2
RIP: 0033:0x7fd13166b3d0

It has been reported on an older (4.12) kernel but the current upstream
code doesn't cond_resched in the hot remove code at all and the given
range to remove might be really large. Fix the issue by calling
cond_resched once per memory section.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181031125840.23982-1-mhocko@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Acked-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@gmail.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

show more ...

mm/memory_hotplug: fix online/offline_pages called w.o. mem_hotplug_lock

There seem to be some problems as result of 30467e0b3be ("mm, hotplug:
fix concurrent memory hot-add deadlock"), which tried

mm/memory_hotplug: fix online/offline_pages called w.o. mem_hotplug_lock

There seem to be some problems as result of 30467e0b3be ("mm, hotplug:
fix concurrent memory hot-add deadlock"), which tried to fix a possible
lock inversion reported and discussed in [1] due to the two locks
a) device_lock()
b) mem_hotplug_lock

While add_memory() first takes b), followed by a) during
bus_probe_device(), onlining of memory from user space first took a),
followed by b), exposing a possible deadlock.

In [1], and it was decided to not make use of device_hotplug_lock, but
rather to enforce a locking order.

The problems I spotted related to this:

1. Memory block device attributes: While .state first calls
mem_hotplug_begin() and the calls device_online() - which takes
device_lock() - .online does no longer call mem_hotplug_begin(), so
effectively calls online_pages() without mem_hotplug_lock.

2. device_online() should be called under device_hotplug_lock, however
onlining memory during add_memory() does not take care of that.

In addition, I think there is also something wrong about the locking in

3. arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/memtrace.c calls offline_pages()
without locks. This was introduced after 30467e0b3be. And skimming over
the code, I assume it could need some more care in regards to locking
(e.g. device_online() called without device_hotplug_lock. This will
be addressed in the following patches.

Now that we hold the device_hotplug_lock when
- adding memory (e.g. via add_memory()/add_memory_resource())
- removing memory (e.g. via remove_memory())
- device_online()/device_offline()

We can move mem_hotplug_lock usage back into
online_pages()/offline_pages().

Why is mem_hotplug_lock still needed? Essentially to make
get_online_mems()/put_online_mems() be very fast (relying on
device_hotplug_lock would be very slow), and to serialize against
addition of memory that does not create memory block devices (hmm).

[1] http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/pipermail/ driverdev-devel/
2015-February/065324.html

This patch is partly based on a patch by Vitaly Kuznetsov.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180925091457.28651-4-david@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Pavel Tatashin <pavel.tatashin@microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Rashmica Gupta <rashmica.g@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: "K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@microsoft.com>
Cc: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@microsoft.com>
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Cc: Rashmica Gupta <rashmica.g@gmail.com>
Cc: Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org>
Cc: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>
Cc: Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com>
Cc: Pavel Tatashin <pavel.tatashin@microsoft.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: YASUAKI ISHIMATSU <yasu.isimatu@gmail.com>
Cc: Mathieu Malaterre <malat@debian.org>
Cc: John Allen <jallen@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Cc: Nathan Fontenot <nfont@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

show more ...

mm/memory_hotplug: make add_memory() take the device_hotplug_lock

add_memory() currently does not take the device_hotplug_lock, however
is aleady called under the lock from
arch/powerpc/platforms/p

mm/memory_hotplug: make add_memory() take the device_hotplug_lock

add_memory() currently does not take the device_hotplug_lock, however
is aleady called under the lock from
arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c
drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c
to synchronize against CPU hot-remove and similar.

In general, we should hold the device_hotplug_lock when adding memory to
synchronize against online/offline request (e.g. from user space) - which
already resulted in lock inversions due to device_lock() and
mem_hotplug_lock - see 30467e0b3be ("mm, hotplug: fix concurrent memory
hot-add deadlock"). add_memory()/add_memory_resource() will create memory
block devices, so this really feels like the right thing to do.

Holding the device_hotplug_lock makes sure that a memory block device
can really only be accessed (e.g. via .online/.state) from user space,
once the memory has been fully added to the system.

The lock is not held yet in
drivers/xen/balloon.c
arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/memtrace.c
drivers/s390/char/sclp_cmd.c
drivers/hv/hv_balloon.c
So, let's either use the locked variants or take the lock.

Don't export add_memory_resource(), as it once was exported to be used by
XEN, which is never built as a module. If somebody requires it, we also
have to export a locked variant (as device_hotplug_lock is never
exported).

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180925091457.28651-3-david@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Pavel Tatashin <pavel.tatashin@microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rashmica Gupta <rashmica.g@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Cc: Nathan Fontenot <nfont@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: John Allen <jallen@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Mathieu Malaterre <malat@debian.org>
Cc: Pavel Tatashin <pavel.tatashin@microsoft.com>
Cc: YASUAKI ISHIMATSU <yasu.isimatu@gmail.com>
Cc: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>
Cc: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: "K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@microsoft.com>
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org>
Cc: Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@microsoft.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

show more ...

mm/memory_hotplug: make remove_memory() take the device_hotplug_lock

Patch series "mm: online/offline_pages called w.o. mem_hotplug_lock", v3.

Reading through the code and studying how mem_hotplug_

mm/memory_hotplug: make remove_memory() take the device_hotplug_lock

Patch series "mm: online/offline_pages called w.o. mem_hotplug_lock", v3.

Reading through the code and studying how mem_hotplug_lock is to be used,
I noticed that there are two places where we can end up calling
device_online()/device_offline() - online_pages()/offline_pages() without
the mem_hotplug_lock. And there are other places where we call
device_online()/device_offline() without the device_hotplug_lock.

While e.g.
echo "online" > /sys/devices/system/memory/memory9/state
is fine, e.g.
echo 1 > /sys/devices/system/memory/memory9/online
Will not take the mem_hotplug_lock. However the device_lock() and
device_hotplug_lock.

E.g. via memory_probe_store(), we can end up calling
add_memory()->online_pages() without the device_hotplug_lock. So we can
have concurrent callers in online_pages(). We e.g. touch in
online_pages() basically unprotected zone->present_pages then.

Looks like there is a longer history to that (see Patch #2 for details),
and fixing it to work the way it was intended is not really possible. We
would e.g. have to take the mem_hotplug_lock in device/base/core.c, which
sounds wrong.

Summary: We had a lock inversion on mem_hotplug_lock and device_lock().
More details can be found in patch 3 and patch 6.

I propose the general rules (documentation added in patch 6):

1. add_memory/add_memory_resource() must only be called with
device_hotplug_lock.
2. remove_memory() must only be called with device_hotplug_lock. This is
already documented and holds for all callers.
3. device_online()/device_offline() must only be called with
device_hotplug_lock. This is already documented and true for now in core
code. Other callers (related to memory hotplug) have to be fixed up.
4. mem_hotplug_lock is taken inside of add_memory/remove_memory/
online_pages/offline_pages.

To me, this looks way cleaner than what we have right now (and easier to
verify). And looking at the documentation of remove_memory, using
lock_device_hotplug also for add_memory() feels natural.

This patch (of 6):

remove_memory() is exported right now but requires the
device_hotplug_lock, which is not exported. So let's provide a variant
that takes the lock and only export that one.

The lock is already held in
arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c
drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c
arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/memtrace.c

Apart from that, there are not other users in the tree.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180925091457.28651-2-david@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Pavel Tatashin <pavel.tatashin@microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rashmica Gupta <rashmica.g@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Cc: Rashmica Gupta <rashmica.g@gmail.com>
Cc: Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org>
Cc: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>
Cc: Nathan Fontenot <nfont@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: John Allen <jallen@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: YASUAKI ISHIMATSU <yasu.isimatu@gmail.com>
Cc: Mathieu Malaterre <malat@debian.org>
Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
Cc: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Cc: Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: "K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@microsoft.com>
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@microsoft.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

show more ...

mm: remove include/linux/bootmem.h

Move remaining definitions and declarations from include/linux/bootmem.h
into include/linux/memblock.h and remove the redundant header.

The includes were replaced

mm: remove include/linux/bootmem.h

Move remaining definitions and declarations from include/linux/bootmem.h
into include/linux/memblock.h and remove the redundant header.

The includes were replaced with the semantic patch below and then
semi-automated removal of duplicated '#include <linux/memblock.h>

@@
@@
- #include <linux/bootmem.h>
+ #include <linux/memblock.h>

[sfr@canb.auug.org.au: dma-direct: fix up for the removal of linux/bootmem.h]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181002185342.133d1680@canb.auug.org.au
[sfr@canb.auug.org.au: powerpc: fix up for removal of linux/bootmem.h]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181005161406.73ef8727@canb.auug.org.au
[sfr@canb.auug.org.au: x86/kaslr, ACPI/NUMA: fix for linux/bootmem.h removal]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181008190341.5e396491@canb.auug.org.au
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1536927045-23536-30-git-send-email-rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Greentime Hu <green.hu@gmail.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Guan Xuetao <gxt@pku.edu.cn>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@parisc-linux.org>
Cc: Jonas Bonn <jonas@southpole.se>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: Ley Foon Tan <lftan@altera.com>
Cc: Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com>
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>
Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>
Cc: Paul Burton <paul.burton@mips.com>
Cc: Richard Kuo <rkuo@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>
Cc: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@gmail.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

show more ...

mm/memory_hotplug.c: clean up node_states_check_changes_offline()

This patch, as the previous one, gets rid of the wrong if statements.
While at it, I realized that the comments are sometimes very c

mm/memory_hotplug.c: clean up node_states_check_changes_offline()

This patch, as the previous one, gets rid of the wrong if statements.
While at it, I realized that the comments are sometimes very confusing,
to say the least, and wrong.
For example:

___
zone_last = ZONE_MOVABLE;

/*
* check whether node_states[N_HIGH_MEMORY] will be changed
* If we try to offline the last present @nr_pages from the node,
* we can determind we will need to clear the node from
* node_states[N_HIGH_MEMORY].
*/

for (; zt <= zone_last; zt++)
present_pages += pgdat->node_zones[zt].present_pages;
if (nr_pages >= present_pages)
arg->status_change_nid = zone_to_nid(zone);
else
arg->status_change_nid = -1;
___

In case the node gets empry, it must be removed from N_MEMORY. We already
check N_HIGH_MEMORY a bit above within the CONFIG_HIGHMEM ifdef code. Not
to say that status_change_nid is for N_MEMORY, and not for N_HIGH_MEMORY.

So I re-wrote some of the comments to what I think is better.

[osalvador@suse.de: address feedback from Pavel]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180921132634.10103-5-osalvador@techadventures.net
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180919100819.25518-6-osalvador@techadventures.net
Signed-off-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Pavel Tatashin <pavel.tatashin@microsoft.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Cc: <yasu.isimatu@gmail.com>
Cc: Mathieu Malaterre <malat@debian.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

show more ...

mm/memory_hotplug.c: simplify node_states_check_changes_online

While looking at node_states_check_changes_online, I stumbled upon some
confusing things.

Right after entering the function, we find t

mm/memory_hotplug.c: simplify node_states_check_changes_online

While looking at node_states_check_changes_online, I stumbled upon some
confusing things.

Right after entering the function, we find this:

if (N_MEMORY == N_NORMAL_MEMORY)
zone_last = ZONE_MOVABLE;

This is wrong.
N_MEMORY cannot really be equal to N_NORMAL_MEMORY.
My guess is that this wanted to be something like:

if (N_NORMAL_MEMORY == N_HIGH_MEMORY)

to check if we have CONFIG_HIGHMEM.

Later on, in the CONFIG_HIGHMEM block, we have:

if (N_MEMORY == N_HIGH_MEMORY)
zone_last = ZONE_MOVABLE;

Again, this is wrong, and will never be evaluated to true.

Besides removing these wrong if statements, I simplified the function a
bit.

[osalvador@suse.de: address feedback from Pavel]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180921132634.10103-4-osalvador@techadventures.net
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180919100819.25518-5-osalvador@techadventures.net
Signed-off-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Pavel Tatashin <pavel.tatashin@microsoft.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Cc: Mathieu Malaterre <malat@debian.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: <yasu.isimatu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

show more ...

mm/memory_hotplug.c: tidy up node_states_clear_node()

node_states_clear has the following if statements:

if ((N_MEMORY != N_NORMAL_MEMORY) &&
(arg->status_change_nid_high >= 0))
...

if

mm/memory_hotplug.c: tidy up node_states_clear_node()

node_states_clear has the following if statements:

if ((N_MEMORY != N_NORMAL_MEMORY) &&
(arg->status_change_nid_high >= 0))
...

if ((N_MEMORY != N_HIGH_MEMORY) &&
(arg->status_change_nid >= 0))
...

N_MEMORY can never be equal to neither N_NORMAL_MEMORY nor
N_HIGH_MEMORY.

Similar problem was found in [1].
Since this is wrong, let us get rid of it.

[1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10579155/

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180919100819.25518-4-osalvador@techadventures.net
Signed-off-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Pavel Tatashin <pavel.tatashin@microsoft.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Cc: Mathieu Malaterre <malat@debian.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: <yasu.isimatu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

show more ...

mm/memory_hotplug.c: spare unnecessary calls to node_set_state

In node_states_check_changes_online, we check if the node will have to be
set for any of the N_*_MEMORY states after the pages have bee

mm/memory_hotplug.c: spare unnecessary calls to node_set_state

In node_states_check_changes_online, we check if the node will have to be
set for any of the N_*_MEMORY states after the pages have been onlined.

Later on, we perform the activation in node_states_set_node. Currently,
in node_states_set_node we set the node to N_MEMORY unconditionally.

This means that we call node_set_state for N_MEMORY every time pages go
online, but we only need to do it if the node has not yet been set for
N_MEMORY.

Fix this by checking status_change_nid.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180919100819.25518-2-osalvador@techadventures.net
Signed-off-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Pavel Tatashin <pavel.tatashin@microsoft.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Cc: <yasu.isimatu@gmail.com>
Cc: Mathieu Malaterre <malat@debian.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

show more ...

mm/hugetlb: filter out hugetlb pages if HUGEPAGE migration is not supported.

When scanning for movable pages, filter out Hugetlb pages if hugepage
migration is not supported. Without this we hit in

mm/hugetlb: filter out hugetlb pages if HUGEPAGE migration is not supported.

When scanning for movable pages, filter out Hugetlb pages if hugepage
migration is not supported. Without this we hit infinte loop in
__offline_pages() where we do

pfn = scan_movable_pages(start_pfn, end_pfn);
if (pfn) { /* We have movable pages */
ret = do_migrate_range(pfn, end_pfn);
goto repeat;
}

Fix this by checking hugepage_migration_supported both in
has_unmovable_pages which is the primary backoff mechanism for page
offlining and for consistency reasons also into scan_movable_pages
because it doesn't make any sense to return a pfn to non-migrateable
huge page.

This issue was revealed by, but not caused by 72b39cfc4d75 ("mm,
memory_hotplug: do not fail offlining too early").

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180824063314.21981-1-aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com
Fixes: 72b39cfc4d75 ("mm, memory_hotplug: do not fail offlining too early")
Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
Reported-by: Haren Myneni <haren@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

show more ...