|
Revision tags: v6.6.25, v6.6.24, v6.6.23, v6.6.16, v6.6.15, v6.6.14, v6.6.13, v6.6.12, v6.6.11, v6.6.10, v6.6.9 |
|
| #
ffcaafdb |
| 21-Dec-2023 |
Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> |
ida: Fix crash in ida_free when the bitmap is empty
[ Upstream commit af73483f4e8b6f5c68c9aa63257bdd929a9c194a ]
The IDA usually detects double-frees, but that detection failed to
consider the case
ida: Fix crash in ida_free when the bitmap is empty
[ Upstream commit af73483f4e8b6f5c68c9aa63257bdd929a9c194a ]
The IDA usually detects double-frees, but that detection failed to
consider the case when there are no nearby IDs allocated and so we have a
NULL bitmap rather than simply having a clear bit. Add some tests to the
test-suite to be sure we don't inadvertently reintroduce this problem.
Unfortunately they're quite noisy so include a message to disregard
the warnings.
Reported-by: Zhenghan Wang <wzhmmmmm@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: v6.6.8, v6.6.7, v6.6.6, v6.6.5, v6.6.4, v6.6.3, v6.6.2, v6.5.11, v6.6.1, v6.5.10, v6.6, v6.5.9, v6.5.8, v6.5.7, v6.5.6, v6.5.5, v6.5.4, v6.5.3, v6.5.2, v6.1.51, v6.5.1, v6.1.50, v6.5, v6.1.49 |
|
| #
2a15de80 |
| 26-Aug-2023 |
Ariel Marcovitch <arielmarcovitch@gmail.com> |
idr: fix param name in idr_alloc_cyclic() doc
The relevant parameter is 'start' and not 'nextid'
Fixes: 460488c58ca8 ("idr: Remove idr_alloc_ext")
Signed-off-by: Ariel Marcovitch <arielmarcovitch@g
idr: fix param name in idr_alloc_cyclic() doc
The relevant parameter is 'start' and not 'nextid'
Fixes: 460488c58ca8 ("idr: Remove idr_alloc_ext")
Signed-off-by: Ariel Marcovitch <arielmarcovitch@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: v6.1.48, v6.1.46, v6.1.45, v6.1.44, v6.1.43, v6.1.42, v6.1.41, v6.1.40, v6.1.39, v6.1.38, v6.1.37, v6.1.36, v6.4, v6.1.35, v6.1.34, v6.1.33, v6.1.32, v6.1.31, v6.1.30, v6.1.29, v6.1.28, v6.1.27, v6.1.26, v6.3, v6.1.25, v6.1.24, v6.1.23, v6.1.22, v6.1.21, v6.1.20, v6.1.19, v6.1.18, v6.1.17, v6.1.16, v6.1.15, v6.1.14, v6.1.13, v6.2, v6.1.12, v6.1.11, v6.1.10, v6.1.9, v6.1.8, v6.1.7, v6.1.6, v6.1.5, v6.0.19, v6.0.18, v6.1.4, v6.1.3, v6.0.17, v6.1.2, v6.0.16, v6.1.1, v6.0.15, v6.0.14, v6.0.13, v6.1, v6.0.12, v6.0.11, v6.0.10, v5.15.80, v6.0.9, v5.15.79, v6.0.8, v5.15.78, v6.0.7, v5.15.77, v5.15.76, v6.0.6, v6.0.5, v5.15.75, v6.0.4, v6.0.3, v6.0.2, v5.15.74, v5.15.73, v6.0.1, v5.15.72, v6.0, v5.15.71, v5.15.70, v5.15.69, v5.15.68, v5.15.67, v5.15.66, v5.15.65, v5.15.64, v5.15.63, v5.15.62, v5.15.61, v5.15.60, v5.15.59, v5.19, v5.15.58, v5.15.57, v5.15.56, v5.15.55, v5.15.54 |
|
| #
fc82bbf4 |
| 10-Jul-2022 |
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> |
ida: don't use BUG_ON() for debugging
This is another old BUG_ON() that just shouldn't exist (see also commit
a382f8fee42c: "signal handling: don't use BUG_ON() for debugging").
In fact, as Matthew
ida: don't use BUG_ON() for debugging
This is another old BUG_ON() that just shouldn't exist (see also commit
a382f8fee42c: "signal handling: don't use BUG_ON() for debugging").
In fact, as Matthew Wilcox points out, this condition shouldn't really
even result in a warning, since a negative id allocation result is just
a normal allocation failure:
"I wonder if we should even warn here -- sure, the caller is trying to
free something that wasn't allocated, but we don't warn for
kfree(NULL)"
and goes on to point out how that current error check is only causing
people to unnecessarily do their own index range checking before freeing
it.
This was noted by Itay Iellin, because the bluetooth HCI socket cookie
code does *not* do that range checking, and ends up just freeing the
error case too, triggering the BUG_ON().
The HCI code requires CAP_NET_RAW, and seems to just result in an ugly
splat, but there really is no reason to BUG_ON() here, and we have
generally striven for allocation models where it's always ok to just do
free(alloc());
even if the allocation were to fail for some random reason (usually
obviously that "random" reason being some resource limit).
Fixes: 88eca0207cf1 ("ida: simplified functions for id allocation")
Reported-by: Itay Iellin <ieitayie@gmail.com>
Suggested-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
show more ...
|
| #
8b07022d |
| 10-Jul-2022 |
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> |
ida: don't use BUG_ON() for debugging
commit fc82bbf4dede758007763867d0282353c06d1121 upstream.
This is another old BUG_ON() that just shouldn't exist (see also commit
a382f8fee42c: "signal handlin
ida: don't use BUG_ON() for debugging
commit fc82bbf4dede758007763867d0282353c06d1121 upstream.
This is another old BUG_ON() that just shouldn't exist (see also commit
a382f8fee42c: "signal handling: don't use BUG_ON() for debugging").
In fact, as Matthew Wilcox points out, this condition shouldn't really
even result in a warning, since a negative id allocation result is just
a normal allocation failure:
"I wonder if we should even warn here -- sure, the caller is trying to
free something that wasn't allocated, but we don't warn for
kfree(NULL)"
and goes on to point out how that current error check is only causing
people to unnecessarily do their own index range checking before freeing
it.
This was noted by Itay Iellin, because the bluetooth HCI socket cookie
code does *not* do that range checking, and ends up just freeing the
error case too, triggering the BUG_ON().
The HCI code requires CAP_NET_RAW, and seems to just result in an ugly
splat, but there really is no reason to BUG_ON() here, and we have
generally striven for allocation models where it's always ok to just do
free(alloc());
even if the allocation were to fail for some random reason (usually
obviously that "random" reason being some resource limit).
Fixes: 88eca0207cf1 ("ida: simplified functions for id allocation")
Reported-by: Itay Iellin <ieitayie@gmail.com>
Suggested-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
show more ...
|
| #
8b07022d |
| 10-Jul-2022 |
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> |
ida: don't use BUG_ON() for debugging
commit fc82bbf4dede758007763867d0282353c06d1121 upstream.
This is another old BUG_ON() that just shouldn't exist (see also commit
a382f8fee42c: "signal handlin
ida: don't use BUG_ON() for debugging
commit fc82bbf4dede758007763867d0282353c06d1121 upstream.
This is another old BUG_ON() that just shouldn't exist (see also commit
a382f8fee42c: "signal handling: don't use BUG_ON() for debugging").
In fact, as Matthew Wilcox points out, this condition shouldn't really
even result in a warning, since a negative id allocation result is just
a normal allocation failure:
"I wonder if we should even warn here -- sure, the caller is trying to
free something that wasn't allocated, but we don't warn for
kfree(NULL)"
and goes on to point out how that current error check is only causing
people to unnecessarily do their own index range checking before freeing
it.
This was noted by Itay Iellin, because the bluetooth HCI socket cookie
code does *not* do that range checking, and ends up just freeing the
error case too, triggering the BUG_ON().
The HCI code requires CAP_NET_RAW, and seems to just result in an ugly
splat, but there really is no reason to BUG_ON() here, and we have
generally striven for allocation models where it's always ok to just do
free(alloc());
even if the allocation were to fail for some random reason (usually
obviously that "random" reason being some resource limit).
Fixes: 88eca0207cf1 ("ida: simplified functions for id allocation")
Reported-by: Itay Iellin <ieitayie@gmail.com>
Suggested-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
show more ...
|
| #
8b07022d |
| 10-Jul-2022 |
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> |
ida: don't use BUG_ON() for debugging
commit fc82bbf4dede758007763867d0282353c06d1121 upstream.
This is another old BUG_ON() that just shouldn't exist (see also commit
a382f8fee42c: "signal handlin
ida: don't use BUG_ON() for debugging
commit fc82bbf4dede758007763867d0282353c06d1121 upstream.
This is another old BUG_ON() that just shouldn't exist (see also commit
a382f8fee42c: "signal handling: don't use BUG_ON() for debugging").
In fact, as Matthew Wilcox points out, this condition shouldn't really
even result in a warning, since a negative id allocation result is just
a normal allocation failure:
"I wonder if we should even warn here -- sure, the caller is trying to
free something that wasn't allocated, but we don't warn for
kfree(NULL)"
and goes on to point out how that current error check is only causing
people to unnecessarily do their own index range checking before freeing
it.
This was noted by Itay Iellin, because the bluetooth HCI socket cookie
code does *not* do that range checking, and ends up just freeing the
error case too, triggering the BUG_ON().
The HCI code requires CAP_NET_RAW, and seems to just result in an ugly
splat, but there really is no reason to BUG_ON() here, and we have
generally striven for allocation models where it's always ok to just do
free(alloc());
even if the allocation were to fail for some random reason (usually
obviously that "random" reason being some resource limit).
Fixes: 88eca0207cf1 ("ida: simplified functions for id allocation")
Reported-by: Itay Iellin <ieitayie@gmail.com>
Suggested-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
show more ...
|
| #
8b07022d |
| 10-Jul-2022 |
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> |
ida: don't use BUG_ON() for debugging
commit fc82bbf4dede758007763867d0282353c06d1121 upstream.
This is another old BUG_ON() that just shouldn't exist (see also commit
a382f8fee42c: "signal handlin
ida: don't use BUG_ON() for debugging
commit fc82bbf4dede758007763867d0282353c06d1121 upstream.
This is another old BUG_ON() that just shouldn't exist (see also commit
a382f8fee42c: "signal handling: don't use BUG_ON() for debugging").
In fact, as Matthew Wilcox points out, this condition shouldn't really
even result in a warning, since a negative id allocation result is just
a normal allocation failure:
"I wonder if we should even warn here -- sure, the caller is trying to
free something that wasn't allocated, but we don't warn for
kfree(NULL)"
and goes on to point out how that current error check is only causing
people to unnecessarily do their own index range checking before freeing
it.
This was noted by Itay Iellin, because the bluetooth HCI socket cookie
code does *not* do that range checking, and ends up just freeing the
error case too, triggering the BUG_ON().
The HCI code requires CAP_NET_RAW, and seems to just result in an ugly
splat, but there really is no reason to BUG_ON() here, and we have
generally striven for allocation models where it's always ok to just do
free(alloc());
even if the allocation were to fail for some random reason (usually
obviously that "random" reason being some resource limit).
Fixes: 88eca0207cf1 ("ida: simplified functions for id allocation")
Reported-by: Itay Iellin <ieitayie@gmail.com>
Suggested-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
show more ...
|
| #
8b07022d |
| 10-Jul-2022 |
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> |
ida: don't use BUG_ON() for debugging
commit fc82bbf4dede758007763867d0282353c06d1121 upstream.
This is another old BUG_ON() that just shouldn't exist (see also commit
a382f8fee42c: "signal handlin
ida: don't use BUG_ON() for debugging
commit fc82bbf4dede758007763867d0282353c06d1121 upstream.
This is another old BUG_ON() that just shouldn't exist (see also commit
a382f8fee42c: "signal handling: don't use BUG_ON() for debugging").
In fact, as Matthew Wilcox points out, this condition shouldn't really
even result in a warning, since a negative id allocation result is just
a normal allocation failure:
"I wonder if we should even warn here -- sure, the caller is trying to
free something that wasn't allocated, but we don't warn for
kfree(NULL)"
and goes on to point out how that current error check is only causing
people to unnecessarily do their own index range checking before freeing
it.
This was noted by Itay Iellin, because the bluetooth HCI socket cookie
code does *not* do that range checking, and ends up just freeing the
error case too, triggering the BUG_ON().
The HCI code requires CAP_NET_RAW, and seems to just result in an ugly
splat, but there really is no reason to BUG_ON() here, and we have
generally striven for allocation models where it's always ok to just do
free(alloc());
even if the allocation were to fail for some random reason (usually
obviously that "random" reason being some resource limit).
Fixes: 88eca0207cf1 ("ida: simplified functions for id allocation")
Reported-by: Itay Iellin <ieitayie@gmail.com>
Suggested-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
show more ...
|
| #
8b07022d |
| 10-Jul-2022 |
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> |
ida: don't use BUG_ON() for debugging
commit fc82bbf4dede758007763867d0282353c06d1121 upstream.
This is another old BUG_ON() that just shouldn't exist (see also commit
a382f8fee42c: "signal handlin
ida: don't use BUG_ON() for debugging
commit fc82bbf4dede758007763867d0282353c06d1121 upstream.
This is another old BUG_ON() that just shouldn't exist (see also commit
a382f8fee42c: "signal handling: don't use BUG_ON() for debugging").
In fact, as Matthew Wilcox points out, this condition shouldn't really
even result in a warning, since a negative id allocation result is just
a normal allocation failure:
"I wonder if we should even warn here -- sure, the caller is trying to
free something that wasn't allocated, but we don't warn for
kfree(NULL)"
and goes on to point out how that current error check is only causing
people to unnecessarily do their own index range checking before freeing
it.
This was noted by Itay Iellin, because the bluetooth HCI socket cookie
code does *not* do that range checking, and ends up just freeing the
error case too, triggering the BUG_ON().
The HCI code requires CAP_NET_RAW, and seems to just result in an ugly
splat, but there really is no reason to BUG_ON() here, and we have
generally striven for allocation models where it's always ok to just do
free(alloc());
even if the allocation were to fail for some random reason (usually
obviously that "random" reason being some resource limit).
Fixes: 88eca0207cf1 ("ida: simplified functions for id allocation")
Reported-by: Itay Iellin <ieitayie@gmail.com>
Suggested-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
show more ...
|
| #
8b07022d |
| 10-Jul-2022 |
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> |
ida: don't use BUG_ON() for debugging
commit fc82bbf4dede758007763867d0282353c06d1121 upstream.
This is another old BUG_ON() that just shouldn't exist (see also commit
a382f8fee42c: "signal handlin
ida: don't use BUG_ON() for debugging
commit fc82bbf4dede758007763867d0282353c06d1121 upstream.
This is another old BUG_ON() that just shouldn't exist (see also commit
a382f8fee42c: "signal handling: don't use BUG_ON() for debugging").
In fact, as Matthew Wilcox points out, this condition shouldn't really
even result in a warning, since a negative id allocation result is just
a normal allocation failure:
"I wonder if we should even warn here -- sure, the caller is trying to
free something that wasn't allocated, but we don't warn for
kfree(NULL)"
and goes on to point out how that current error check is only causing
people to unnecessarily do their own index range checking before freeing
it.
This was noted by Itay Iellin, because the bluetooth HCI socket cookie
code does *not* do that range checking, and ends up just freeing the
error case too, triggering the BUG_ON().
The HCI code requires CAP_NET_RAW, and seems to just result in an ugly
splat, but there really is no reason to BUG_ON() here, and we have
generally striven for allocation models where it's always ok to just do
free(alloc());
even if the allocation were to fail for some random reason (usually
obviously that "random" reason being some resource limit).
Fixes: 88eca0207cf1 ("ida: simplified functions for id allocation")
Reported-by: Itay Iellin <ieitayie@gmail.com>
Suggested-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
show more ...
|
| #
8b07022d |
| 10-Jul-2022 |
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> |
ida: don't use BUG_ON() for debugging
commit fc82bbf4dede758007763867d0282353c06d1121 upstream.
This is another old BUG_ON() that just shouldn't exist (see also commit
a382f8fee42c: "signal handlin
ida: don't use BUG_ON() for debugging
commit fc82bbf4dede758007763867d0282353c06d1121 upstream.
This is another old BUG_ON() that just shouldn't exist (see also commit
a382f8fee42c: "signal handling: don't use BUG_ON() for debugging").
In fact, as Matthew Wilcox points out, this condition shouldn't really
even result in a warning, since a negative id allocation result is just
a normal allocation failure:
"I wonder if we should even warn here -- sure, the caller is trying to
free something that wasn't allocated, but we don't warn for
kfree(NULL)"
and goes on to point out how that current error check is only causing
people to unnecessarily do their own index range checking before freeing
it.
This was noted by Itay Iellin, because the bluetooth HCI socket cookie
code does *not* do that range checking, and ends up just freeing the
error case too, triggering the BUG_ON().
The HCI code requires CAP_NET_RAW, and seems to just result in an ugly
splat, but there really is no reason to BUG_ON() here, and we have
generally striven for allocation models where it's always ok to just do
free(alloc());
even if the allocation were to fail for some random reason (usually
obviously that "random" reason being some resource limit).
Fixes: 88eca0207cf1 ("ida: simplified functions for id allocation")
Reported-by: Itay Iellin <ieitayie@gmail.com>
Suggested-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
show more ...
|
| #
8b07022d |
| 10-Jul-2022 |
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> |
ida: don't use BUG_ON() for debugging
commit fc82bbf4dede758007763867d0282353c06d1121 upstream.
This is another old BUG_ON() that just shouldn't exist (see also commit
a382f8fee42c: "signal handlin
ida: don't use BUG_ON() for debugging
commit fc82bbf4dede758007763867d0282353c06d1121 upstream.
This is another old BUG_ON() that just shouldn't exist (see also commit
a382f8fee42c: "signal handling: don't use BUG_ON() for debugging").
In fact, as Matthew Wilcox points out, this condition shouldn't really
even result in a warning, since a negative id allocation result is just
a normal allocation failure:
"I wonder if we should even warn here -- sure, the caller is trying to
free something that wasn't allocated, but we don't warn for
kfree(NULL)"
and goes on to point out how that current error check is only causing
people to unnecessarily do their own index range checking before freeing
it.
This was noted by Itay Iellin, because the bluetooth HCI socket cookie
code does *not* do that range checking, and ends up just freeing the
error case too, triggering the BUG_ON().
The HCI code requires CAP_NET_RAW, and seems to just result in an ugly
splat, but there really is no reason to BUG_ON() here, and we have
generally striven for allocation models where it's always ok to just do
free(alloc());
even if the allocation were to fail for some random reason (usually
obviously that "random" reason being some resource limit).
Fixes: 88eca0207cf1 ("ida: simplified functions for id allocation")
Reported-by: Itay Iellin <ieitayie@gmail.com>
Suggested-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
show more ...
|
| #
8b07022d |
| 10-Jul-2022 |
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> |
ida: don't use BUG_ON() for debugging
commit fc82bbf4dede758007763867d0282353c06d1121 upstream.
This is another old BUG_ON() that just shouldn't exist (see also commit
a382f8fee42c: "signal handlin
ida: don't use BUG_ON() for debugging
commit fc82bbf4dede758007763867d0282353c06d1121 upstream.
This is another old BUG_ON() that just shouldn't exist (see also commit
a382f8fee42c: "signal handling: don't use BUG_ON() for debugging").
In fact, as Matthew Wilcox points out, this condition shouldn't really
even result in a warning, since a negative id allocation result is just
a normal allocation failure:
"I wonder if we should even warn here -- sure, the caller is trying to
free something that wasn't allocated, but we don't warn for
kfree(NULL)"
and goes on to point out how that current error check is only causing
people to unnecessarily do their own index range checking before freeing
it.
This was noted by Itay Iellin, because the bluetooth HCI socket cookie
code does *not* do that range checking, and ends up just freeing the
error case too, triggering the BUG_ON().
The HCI code requires CAP_NET_RAW, and seems to just result in an ugly
splat, but there really is no reason to BUG_ON() here, and we have
generally striven for allocation models where it's always ok to just do
free(alloc());
even if the allocation were to fail for some random reason (usually
obviously that "random" reason being some resource limit).
Fixes: 88eca0207cf1 ("ida: simplified functions for id allocation")
Reported-by: Itay Iellin <ieitayie@gmail.com>
Suggested-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
show more ...
|
| #
8b07022d |
| 10-Jul-2022 |
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> |
ida: don't use BUG_ON() for debugging
commit fc82bbf4dede758007763867d0282353c06d1121 upstream.
This is another old BUG_ON() that just shouldn't exist (see also commit
a382f8fee42c: "signal handlin
ida: don't use BUG_ON() for debugging
commit fc82bbf4dede758007763867d0282353c06d1121 upstream.
This is another old BUG_ON() that just shouldn't exist (see also commit
a382f8fee42c: "signal handling: don't use BUG_ON() for debugging").
In fact, as Matthew Wilcox points out, this condition shouldn't really
even result in a warning, since a negative id allocation result is just
a normal allocation failure:
"I wonder if we should even warn here -- sure, the caller is trying to
free something that wasn't allocated, but we don't warn for
kfree(NULL)"
and goes on to point out how that current error check is only causing
people to unnecessarily do their own index range checking before freeing
it.
This was noted by Itay Iellin, because the bluetooth HCI socket cookie
code does *not* do that range checking, and ends up just freeing the
error case too, triggering the BUG_ON().
The HCI code requires CAP_NET_RAW, and seems to just result in an ugly
splat, but there really is no reason to BUG_ON() here, and we have
generally striven for allocation models where it's always ok to just do
free(alloc());
even if the allocation were to fail for some random reason (usually
obviously that "random" reason being some resource limit).
Fixes: 88eca0207cf1 ("ida: simplified functions for id allocation")
Reported-by: Itay Iellin <ieitayie@gmail.com>
Suggested-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
show more ...
|
| #
8b07022d |
| 10-Jul-2022 |
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> |
ida: don't use BUG_ON() for debugging
commit fc82bbf4dede758007763867d0282353c06d1121 upstream.
This is another old BUG_ON() that just shouldn't exist (see also commit
a382f8fee42c: "signal handlin
ida: don't use BUG_ON() for debugging
commit fc82bbf4dede758007763867d0282353c06d1121 upstream.
This is another old BUG_ON() that just shouldn't exist (see also commit
a382f8fee42c: "signal handling: don't use BUG_ON() for debugging").
In fact, as Matthew Wilcox points out, this condition shouldn't really
even result in a warning, since a negative id allocation result is just
a normal allocation failure:
"I wonder if we should even warn here -- sure, the caller is trying to
free something that wasn't allocated, but we don't warn for
kfree(NULL)"
and goes on to point out how that current error check is only causing
people to unnecessarily do their own index range checking before freeing
it.
This was noted by Itay Iellin, because the bluetooth HCI socket cookie
code does *not* do that range checking, and ends up just freeing the
error case too, triggering the BUG_ON().
The HCI code requires CAP_NET_RAW, and seems to just result in an ugly
splat, but there really is no reason to BUG_ON() here, and we have
generally striven for allocation models where it's always ok to just do
free(alloc());
even if the allocation were to fail for some random reason (usually
obviously that "random" reason being some resource limit).
Fixes: 88eca0207cf1 ("ida: simplified functions for id allocation")
Reported-by: Itay Iellin <ieitayie@gmail.com>
Suggested-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
show more ...
|
| #
8b07022d |
| 10-Jul-2022 |
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> |
ida: don't use BUG_ON() for debugging
commit fc82bbf4dede758007763867d0282353c06d1121 upstream.
This is another old BUG_ON() that just shouldn't exist (see also commit
a382f8fee42c: "signal handlin
ida: don't use BUG_ON() for debugging
commit fc82bbf4dede758007763867d0282353c06d1121 upstream.
This is another old BUG_ON() that just shouldn't exist (see also commit
a382f8fee42c: "signal handling: don't use BUG_ON() for debugging").
In fact, as Matthew Wilcox points out, this condition shouldn't really
even result in a warning, since a negative id allocation result is just
a normal allocation failure:
"I wonder if we should even warn here -- sure, the caller is trying to
free something that wasn't allocated, but we don't warn for
kfree(NULL)"
and goes on to point out how that current error check is only causing
people to unnecessarily do their own index range checking before freeing
it.
This was noted by Itay Iellin, because the bluetooth HCI socket cookie
code does *not* do that range checking, and ends up just freeing the
error case too, triggering the BUG_ON().
The HCI code requires CAP_NET_RAW, and seems to just result in an ugly
splat, but there really is no reason to BUG_ON() here, and we have
generally striven for allocation models where it's always ok to just do
free(alloc());
even if the allocation were to fail for some random reason (usually
obviously that "random" reason being some resource limit).
Fixes: 88eca0207cf1 ("ida: simplified functions for id allocation")
Reported-by: Itay Iellin <ieitayie@gmail.com>
Suggested-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
show more ...
|
| #
8b07022d |
| 10-Jul-2022 |
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> |
ida: don't use BUG_ON() for debugging
commit fc82bbf4dede758007763867d0282353c06d1121 upstream.
This is another old BUG_ON() that just shouldn't exist (see also commit
a382f8fee42c: "signal handlin
ida: don't use BUG_ON() for debugging
commit fc82bbf4dede758007763867d0282353c06d1121 upstream.
This is another old BUG_ON() that just shouldn't exist (see also commit
a382f8fee42c: "signal handling: don't use BUG_ON() for debugging").
In fact, as Matthew Wilcox points out, this condition shouldn't really
even result in a warning, since a negative id allocation result is just
a normal allocation failure:
"I wonder if we should even warn here -- sure, the caller is trying to
free something that wasn't allocated, but we don't warn for
kfree(NULL)"
and goes on to point out how that current error check is only causing
people to unnecessarily do their own index range checking before freeing
it.
This was noted by Itay Iellin, because the bluetooth HCI socket cookie
code does *not* do that range checking, and ends up just freeing the
error case too, triggering the BUG_ON().
The HCI code requires CAP_NET_RAW, and seems to just result in an ugly
splat, but there really is no reason to BUG_ON() here, and we have
generally striven for allocation models where it's always ok to just do
free(alloc());
even if the allocation were to fail for some random reason (usually
obviously that "random" reason being some resource limit).
Fixes: 88eca0207cf1 ("ida: simplified functions for id allocation")
Reported-by: Itay Iellin <ieitayie@gmail.com>
Suggested-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
show more ...
|
| #
8b07022d |
| 10-Jul-2022 |
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> |
ida: don't use BUG_ON() for debugging
commit fc82bbf4dede758007763867d0282353c06d1121 upstream.
This is another old BUG_ON() that just shouldn't exist (see also commit
a382f8fee42c: "signal handlin
ida: don't use BUG_ON() for debugging
commit fc82bbf4dede758007763867d0282353c06d1121 upstream.
This is another old BUG_ON() that just shouldn't exist (see also commit
a382f8fee42c: "signal handling: don't use BUG_ON() for debugging").
In fact, as Matthew Wilcox points out, this condition shouldn't really
even result in a warning, since a negative id allocation result is just
a normal allocation failure:
"I wonder if we should even warn here -- sure, the caller is trying to
free something that wasn't allocated, but we don't warn for
kfree(NULL)"
and goes on to point out how that current error check is only causing
people to unnecessarily do their own index range checking before freeing
it.
This was noted by Itay Iellin, because the bluetooth HCI socket cookie
code does *not* do that range checking, and ends up just freeing the
error case too, triggering the BUG_ON().
The HCI code requires CAP_NET_RAW, and seems to just result in an ugly
splat, but there really is no reason to BUG_ON() here, and we have
generally striven for allocation models where it's always ok to just do
free(alloc());
even if the allocation were to fail for some random reason (usually
obviously that "random" reason being some resource limit).
Fixes: 88eca0207cf1 ("ida: simplified functions for id allocation")
Reported-by: Itay Iellin <ieitayie@gmail.com>
Suggested-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: v5.15.53, v5.15.52, v5.15.51, v5.15.50, v5.15.49, v5.15.48, v5.15.47, v5.15.46, v5.15.45, v5.15.44, v5.15.43, v5.15.42, v5.18, v5.15.41, v5.15.40, v5.15.39, v5.15.38, v5.15.37, v5.15.36, v5.15.35, v5.15.34, v5.15.33, v5.15.32, v5.15.31, v5.17, v5.15.30, v5.15.29, v5.15.28, v5.15.27, v5.15.26, v5.15.25, v5.15.24, v5.15.23, v5.15.22, v5.15.21, v5.15.20, v5.15.19, v5.15.18, v5.15.17, v5.4.173, v5.15.16, v5.15.15, v5.16, v5.15.10, v5.15.9, v5.15.8, v5.15.7, v5.15.6, v5.15.5, v5.15.4, v5.15.3, v5.15.2, v5.15.1, v5.15, v5.14.14, v5.14.13, v5.14.12, v5.14.11, v5.14.10, v5.14.9, v5.14.8, v5.14.7, v5.14.6, v5.10.67, v5.10.66, v5.14.5, v5.14.4, v5.10.65, v5.14.3, v5.10.64, v5.14.2, v5.10.63, v5.14.1, v5.10.62, v5.14, v5.10.61, v5.10.60, v5.10.53, v5.10.52, v5.10.51, v5.10.50, v5.10.49, v5.13, v5.10.46, v5.10.43, v5.10.42, v5.10.41, v5.10.40, v5.10.39, v5.4.119, v5.10.36, v5.10.35, v5.10.34, v5.4.116, v5.10.33, v5.12, v5.10.32, v5.10.31, v5.10.30, v5.10.27, v5.10.26, v5.10.25, v5.10.24, v5.10.23, v5.10.22, v5.10.21, v5.10.20, v5.10.19, v5.4.101, v5.10.18, v5.10.17, v5.11, v5.10.16, v5.10.15, v5.10.14, v5.10, v5.8.17, v5.8.16 |
|
| #
3b674261 |
| 15-Oct-2020 |
Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org> |
lib/idr.c: document calling context for IDA APIs mustn't use locks
The documentation for these functions indicates that callers don't need to
hold a lock while calling them, but that documentation i
lib/idr.c: document calling context for IDA APIs mustn't use locks
The documentation for these functions indicates that callers don't need to
hold a lock while calling them, but that documentation is only in one
place under "IDA Usage". Let's state the same information on each IDA
function so that it's clear what the calling context requires.
Furthermore, let's document ida_simple_get() with the same information so
that callers know how this API works.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Tri Vo <trong@android.com>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200910055246.2297797-1-swboyd@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: v5.8.15, v5.9, v5.8.14, v5.8.13, v5.8.12, v5.8.11, v5.8.10, v5.8.9, v5.8.8, v5.8.7, v5.8.6, v5.4.62, v5.8.5, v5.8.4, v5.4.61, v5.8.3, v5.4.60, v5.8.2, v5.4.59, v5.8.1, v5.4.58, v5.4.57, v5.4.56, v5.8, v5.7.12, v5.4.55, v5.7.11, v5.4.54, v5.7.10, v5.4.53, v5.4.52, v5.7.9, v5.7.8, v5.4.51, v5.4.50, v5.7.7, v5.4.49, v5.7.6, v5.7.5, v5.4.48, v5.7.4, v5.7.3, v5.4.47, v5.4.46, v5.7.2, v5.4.45, v5.7.1, v5.4.44, v5.7, v5.4.43, v5.4.42, v5.4.41, v5.4.40, v5.4.39, v5.4.38, v5.4.37, v5.4.36, v5.4.35, v5.4.34, v5.4.33, v5.4.32, v5.4.31 |
|
| #
a219b856 |
| 02-Apr-2020 |
Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> |
ida: Free allocated bitmap in error path
If a bitmap needs to be allocated, and then by the time the thread
is scheduled to be run again all the indices which would satisfy the
allocation have been
ida: Free allocated bitmap in error path
If a bitmap needs to be allocated, and then by the time the thread
is scheduled to be run again all the indices which would satisfy the
allocation have been allocated then we would leak the allocation. Almost
impossible to hit in practice, but a trivial fix. Found by Coverity.
Fixes: f32f004cddf8 ("ida: Convert to XArray")
Reported-by: coverity-bot <keescook+coverity-bot@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: v5.4.30, v5.4.29, v5.6, v5.4.28, v5.4.27, v5.4.26, v5.4.25, v5.4.24, v5.4.23, v5.4.22, v5.4.21, v5.4.20, v5.4.19, v5.4.18, v5.4.17, v5.4.16, v5.5, v5.4.15, v5.4.14, v5.4.13, v5.4.12, v5.4.11, v5.4.10, v5.4.9, v5.4.8, v5.4.7, v5.4.6, v5.4.5, v5.4.4, v5.4.3, v5.3.15, v5.4.2, v5.4.1, v5.3.14, v5.4, v5.3.13, v5.3.12, v5.3.11, v5.3.10, v5.3.9 |
|
| #
5a74ac4c |
| 01-Nov-2019 |
Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> |
idr: Fix idr_get_next_ul race with idr_remove
Commit 5c089fd0c734 ("idr: Fix idr_get_next race with idr_remove")
neglected to fix idr_get_next_ul(). As far as I can tell, nobody's
actually using th
idr: Fix idr_get_next_ul race with idr_remove
Commit 5c089fd0c734 ("idr: Fix idr_get_next race with idr_remove")
neglected to fix idr_get_next_ul(). As far as I can tell, nobody's
actually using this interface under the RCU read lock, but fix it now
before anybody decides to use it.
Fixes: 5c089fd0c734 ("idr: Fix idr_get_next race with idr_remove")
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: v5.3.8, v5.3.7, v5.3.6, v5.3.5, v5.3.4, v5.3.3, v5.3.2, v5.3.1, v5.3, v5.2.14, v5.3-rc8, v5.2.13, v5.2.12, v5.2.11, v5.2.10, v5.2.9, v5.2.8, v5.2.7, v5.2.6, v5.2.5, v5.2.4, v5.2.3, v5.2.2, v5.2.1, v5.2, v5.1.16, v5.1.15, v5.1.14, v5.1.13, v5.1.12, v5.1.11, v5.1.10, v5.1.9, v5.1.8, v5.1.7, v5.1.6, v5.1.5, v5.1.4, v5.1.3 |
|
| #
5c089fd0 |
| 14-May-2019 |
Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> |
idr: Fix idr_get_next race with idr_remove
If the entry is deleted from the IDR between the call to
radix_tree_iter_find() and rcu_dereference_raw(), idr_get_next()
will return NULL, which will end
idr: Fix idr_get_next race with idr_remove
If the entry is deleted from the IDR between the call to
radix_tree_iter_find() and rcu_dereference_raw(), idr_get_next()
will return NULL, which will end the iteration prematurely. We should
instead continue to the next entry in the IDR. This only happens if the
iteration is protected by the RCU lock. Most IDR users use a spinlock
or semaphore to exclude simultaneous modifications. It was noticed once
the PID allocator was converted to use the IDR, as it uses the RCU lock,
but there may be other users elsewhere in the kernel.
We can't use the normal pattern of calling radix_tree_deref_retry()
(which catches both a retry entry in a leaf node and a node entry in
the root) as the IDR supports storing entries which are unaligned,
which will trigger an infinite loop if they are encountered. Instead,
we have to explicitly check whether the entry is a retry entry.
Fixes: 0a835c4f090a ("Reimplement IDR and IDA using the radix tree")
Reported-by: Brendan Gregg <bgregg@netflix.com>
Tested-by: Brendan Gregg <bgregg@netflix.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
show more ...
|
| #
457c8996 |
| 19-May-2019 |
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> |
treewide: Add SPDX license identifier for missed files
Add SPDX license identifiers to all files which:
- Have no license information of any form
- Have EXPORT_.*_SYMBOL_GPL inside which was use
treewide: Add SPDX license identifier for missed files
Add SPDX license identifiers to all files which:
- Have no license information of any form
- Have EXPORT_.*_SYMBOL_GPL inside which was used in the
initial scan/conversion to ignore the file
These files fall under the project license, GPL v2 only. The resulting SPDX
license identifier is:
GPL-2.0-only
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: v5.1.2, v5.1.1, v5.0.14, v5.1, v5.0.13, v5.0.12, v5.0.11, v5.0.10, v5.0.9, v5.0.8, v5.0.7, v5.0.6, v5.0.5, v5.0.4, v5.0.3, v4.19.29, v5.0.2, v4.19.28, v5.0.1, v4.19.27, v5.0, v4.19.26, v4.19.25, v4.19.24, v4.19.23, v4.19.22, v4.19.21, v4.19.20, v4.19.19, v4.19.18, v4.19.17, v4.19.16, v4.19.15, v4.19.14, v4.19.13, v4.19.12, v4.19.11, v4.19.10, v4.19.9, v4.19.8, v4.19.7, v4.19.6, v4.19.5, v4.19.4, v4.18.20, v4.19.3, v4.18.19, v4.19.2, v4.18.18, v4.18.17, v4.19.1, v4.19, v4.18.16, v4.18.15, v4.18.14, v4.18.13, v4.18.12, v4.18.11, v4.18.10, v4.18.9, v4.18.7, v4.18.6, v4.18.5, v4.17.18, v4.18.4, v4.18.3, v4.17.17, v4.18.2, v4.17.16, v4.17.15, v4.18.1, v4.18, v4.17.14, v4.17.13, v4.17.12, v4.17.11, v4.17.10, v4.17.9, v4.17.8, v4.17.7, v4.17.6, v4.17.5, v4.17.4, v4.17.3, v4.17.2, v4.17.1, v4.17 |
|
| #
1cf56f9d |
| 09-Apr-2018 |
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> |
radix tree: Remove radix_tree_update_node_t
The only user of this functionality was the workingset code, and it's
now been converted to the XArray. Remove __radix_tree_delete_node()
entirely as it
radix tree: Remove radix_tree_update_node_t
The only user of this functionality was the workingset code, and it's
now been converted to the XArray. Remove __radix_tree_delete_node()
entirely as it was also only used by the workingset code.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
show more ...
|
| #
f32f004c |
| 04-Jul-2018 |
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> |
ida: Convert to XArray
Use the XA_TRACK_FREE ability to track which entries have a free bit,
similarly to how it uses the radix tree's IDR_FREE tag. This eliminates
the per-cpu ida_bitmap preload,
ida: Convert to XArray
Use the XA_TRACK_FREE ability to track which entries have a free bit,
similarly to how it uses the radix tree's IDR_FREE tag. This eliminates
the per-cpu ida_bitmap preload, and fixes the memory consumption
regression I introduced when making the IDR able to store any pointer.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
show more ...
|