|
Revision tags: v6.6.25, v6.6.24, v6.6.23, v6.6.16, v6.6.15, v6.6.14, v6.6.13, v6.6.12, v6.6.11, v6.6.10, v6.6.9, v6.6.8, v6.6.7, v6.6.6, v6.6.5, v6.6.4, v6.6.3, v6.6.2, v6.5.11, v6.6.1, v6.5.10, v6.6, v6.5.9, v6.5.8, v6.5.7, v6.5.6, v6.5.5, v6.5.4, v6.5.3, v6.5.2, v6.1.51, v6.5.1, v6.1.50, v6.5, v6.1.49, v6.1.48, v6.1.46, v6.1.45, v6.1.44, v6.1.43, v6.1.42, v6.1.41, v6.1.40, v6.1.39, v6.1.38, v6.1.37, v6.1.36, v6.4, v6.1.35, v6.1.34, v6.1.33, v6.1.32, v6.1.31, v6.1.30, v6.1.29, v6.1.28, v6.1.27, v6.1.26, v6.3, v6.1.25, v6.1.24, v6.1.23, v6.1.22, v6.1.21, v6.1.20, v6.1.19, v6.1.18, v6.1.17, v6.1.16, v6.1.15, v6.1.14, v6.1.13, v6.2, v6.1.12, v6.1.11, v6.1.10, v6.1.9, v6.1.8, v6.1.7, v6.1.6, v6.1.5, v6.0.19, v6.0.18, v6.1.4, v6.1.3, v6.0.17, v6.1.2, v6.0.16, v6.1.1, v6.0.15, v6.0.14, v6.0.13, v6.1, v6.0.12, v6.0.11, v6.0.10, v5.15.80, v6.0.9, v5.15.79, v6.0.8, v5.15.78, v6.0.7, v5.15.77, v5.15.76, v6.0.6, v6.0.5, v5.15.75, v6.0.4, v6.0.3, v6.0.2, v5.15.74, v5.15.73, v6.0.1, v5.15.72, v6.0, v5.15.71, v5.15.70, v5.15.69 |
|
| #
7825451f |
| 15-Sep-2022 |
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> |
static_call: Add call depth tracking support
When indirect calls are switched to direct calls then it has to be ensured
that the call target is not the function, but the call thunk when call
depth t
static_call: Add call depth tracking support
When indirect calls are switched to direct calls then it has to be ensured
that the call target is not the function, but the call thunk when call
depth tracking is enabled. But static calls are available before call
thunks have been set up.
Ensure a second run through the static call patching code after call thunks
have been created. When call thunks are not enabled this has no side
effects.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220915111148.306100465@infradead.org
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: v5.15.68, v5.15.67, v5.15.66, v5.15.65, v5.15.64, v5.15.63, v5.15.62, v5.15.61, v5.15.60, v5.15.59, v5.19, v5.15.58, v5.15.57, v5.15.56, v5.15.55, v5.15.54, v5.15.53, v5.15.52, v5.15.51, v5.15.50, v5.15.49, v5.15.48, v5.15.47, v5.15.46, v5.15.45, v5.15.44, v5.15.43, v5.15.42, v5.18, v5.15.41, v5.15.40, v5.15.39, v5.15.38, v5.15.37, v5.15.36, v5.15.35, v5.15.34, v5.15.33, v5.15.32, v5.15.31, v5.17, v5.15.30, v5.15.29 |
|
| #
8fd4ddda |
| 14-Mar-2022 |
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> |
static_call: Don't make __static_call_return0 static
System.map shows that vmlinux contains several instances of
__static_call_return0():
c0004fc0 t __static_call_return0
c0011518 t __static_call
static_call: Don't make __static_call_return0 static
System.map shows that vmlinux contains several instances of
__static_call_return0():
c0004fc0 t __static_call_return0
c0011518 t __static_call_return0
c00d8160 t __static_call_return0
arch_static_call_transform() uses the middle one to check whether we are
setting a call to __static_call_return0 or not:
c0011520 <arch_static_call_transform>:
c0011520: 3d 20 c0 01 lis r9,-16383 <== r9 = 0xc001 << 16
c0011524: 39 29 15 18 addi r9,r9,5400 <== r9 += 0x1518
c0011528: 7c 05 48 00 cmpw r5,r9 <== r9 has value 0xc0011518 here
So if static_call_update() is called with one of the other instances of
__static_call_return0(), arch_static_call_transform() won't recognise it.
In order to work properly, global single instance of __static_call_return0() is required.
Fixes: 3f2a8fc4b15d ("static_call/x86: Add __static_call_return0()")
Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/30821468a0e7d28251954b578e5051dc09300d04.1647258493.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu
show more ...
|
| #
68cea1e2 |
| 14-Mar-2022 |
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> |
static_call: Don't make __static_call_return0 static
commit 8fd4ddda2f49a66bf5dd3d0c01966c4b1971308b upstream.
System.map shows that vmlinux contains several instances of
__static_call_return0():
static_call: Don't make __static_call_return0 static
commit 8fd4ddda2f49a66bf5dd3d0c01966c4b1971308b upstream.
System.map shows that vmlinux contains several instances of
__static_call_return0():
c0004fc0 t __static_call_return0
c0011518 t __static_call_return0
c00d8160 t __static_call_return0
arch_static_call_transform() uses the middle one to check whether we are
setting a call to __static_call_return0 or not:
c0011520 <arch_static_call_transform>:
c0011520: 3d 20 c0 01 lis r9,-16383 <== r9 = 0xc001 << 16
c0011524: 39 29 15 18 addi r9,r9,5400 <== r9 += 0x1518
c0011528: 7c 05 48 00 cmpw r5,r9 <== r9 has value 0xc0011518 here
So if static_call_update() is called with one of the other instances of
__static_call_return0(), arch_static_call_transform() won't recognise it.
In order to work properly, global single instance of __static_call_return0() is required.
Fixes: 3f2a8fc4b15d ("static_call/x86: Add __static_call_return0()")
Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/30821468a0e7d28251954b578e5051dc09300d04.1647258493.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
show more ...
|