rcu/tree: Defer setting of jiffies during stall reset

commit b96e7a5fa0ba9cda32888e04f8f4bac42d49a7f8 upstream.

There are instances where rcu_cpu_stall_reset() is called when jiffies
did not get a

rcu/tree: Defer setting of jiffies during stall reset

commit b96e7a5fa0ba9cda32888e04f8f4bac42d49a7f8 upstream.

There are instances where rcu_cpu_stall_reset() is called when jiffies
did not get a chance to update for a long time. Before jiffies is
updated, the CPU stall detector can go off triggering false-positives
where a just-started grace period appears to be ages old. In the past,
we disabled stall detection in rcu_cpu_stall_reset() however this got
changed [1]. This is resulting in false-positives in KGDB usecase [2].

Fix this by deferring the update of jiffies to the third run of the FQS
loop. This is more robust, as, even if rcu_cpu_stall_reset() is called
just before jiffies is read, we would end up pushing out the jiffies
read by 3 more FQS loops. Meanwhile the CPU stall detection will be
delayed and we will not get any false positives.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20210521155624.174524-2-senozhatsky@chromium.org/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230814020045.51950-2-chenhuacai@loongson.cn/

Tested with rcutorture.cpu_stall option as well to verify stall behavior
with/without patch.

Tested-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>
Reported-by: Binbin Zhou <zhoubinbin@loongson.cn>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230814020045.51950-2-chenhuacai@loongson.cn/
Suggested-by: Paul McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: a80be428fbc1 ("rcu: Do not disable GP stall detection in rcu_cpu_stall_reset()")
Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

show more ...

rcu: Add RCU stall diagnosis information

Because RCU CPU stall warnings are driven from the scheduling-clock
interrupt handler, a workload consisting of a very large number of
short-duration hardwar

rcu: Add RCU stall diagnosis information

Because RCU CPU stall warnings are driven from the scheduling-clock
interrupt handler, a workload consisting of a very large number of
short-duration hardware interrupts can result in misleading stall-warning
messages. On systems supporting only a single level of interrupts,
that is, where interrupts handlers cannot be interrupted, this can
produce misleading diagnostics. The stack traces will show the
innocent-bystander interrupted task, not the interrupts that are
at the very least exacerbating the stall.

This situation can be improved by displaying the number of interrupts
and the CPU time that they have consumed. Diagnosing other types
of stalls can be eased by also providing the count of softirqs and
the CPU time that they consumed as well as the number of context
switches and the task-level CPU time consumed.

Consider the following output given this change:

rcu: INFO: rcu_preempt self-detected stall on CPU
rcu: 0-....: (1250 ticks this GP) <omitted>
rcu: hardirqs softirqs csw/system
rcu: number: 624 45 0
rcu: cputime: 69 1 2425 ==> 2500(ms)

This output shows that the number of hard and soft interrupts is small,
there are no context switches, and the system takes up a lot of time. This
indicates that the current task is looping with preemption disabled.

The impact on system performance is negligible because snapshot is
recorded only once for all continuous RCU stalls.

This added debugging information is suppressed by default and can be
enabled by building the kernel with CONFIG_RCU_CPU_STALL_CPUTIME=y or
by booting with rcupdate.rcu_cpu_stall_cputime=1.

Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Mukesh Ojha <quic_mojha@quicinc.com>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>

show more ...

rcu: Make call_rcu() lazy to save power

Implement timer-based RCU callback batching (also known as lazy
callbacks). With this we save about 5-10% of power consumed due
to RCU requests that happen wh

rcu: Make call_rcu() lazy to save power

Implement timer-based RCU callback batching (also known as lazy
callbacks). With this we save about 5-10% of power consumed due
to RCU requests that happen when system is lightly loaded or idle.

By default, all async callbacks (queued via call_rcu) are marked
lazy. An alternate API call_rcu_hurry() is provided for the few users,
for example synchronize_rcu(), that need the old behavior.

The batch is flushed whenever a certain amount of time has passed, or
the batch on a particular CPU grows too big. Also memory pressure will
flush it in a future patch.

To handle several corner cases automagically (such as rcu_barrier() and
hotplug), we re-use bypass lists which were originally introduced to
address lock contention, to handle lazy CBs as well. The bypass list
length has the lazy CB length included in it. A separate lazy CB length
counter is also introduced to keep track of the number of lazy CBs.

[ paulmck: Fix formatting of inline call_rcu_lazy() definition. ]
[ paulmck: Apply Zqiang feedback. ]
[ paulmck: Apply s/call_rcu_flush/call_rcu_hurry/ feedback from Tejun Heo. ]

Suggested-by: Paul McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>

show more ...

rcu: Fix missing nocb gp wake on rcu_barrier()

In preparation for RCU lazy changes, wake up the RCU nocb gp thread if
needed after an entrain. This change prevents the RCU barrier callback
from wai

rcu: Fix missing nocb gp wake on rcu_barrier()

In preparation for RCU lazy changes, wake up the RCU nocb gp thread if
needed after an entrain. This change prevents the RCU barrier callback
from waiting in the queue for several seconds before the lazy callbacks
in front of it are serviced.

Reported-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>

show more ...

rcu: Add polled expedited grace-period primitives

This commit adds expedited grace-period functionality to RCU's polled
grace-period API, adding start_poll_synchronize_rcu_expedited() and
cond_synch

rcu: Add polled expedited grace-period primitives

This commit adds expedited grace-period functionality to RCU's polled
grace-period API, adding start_poll_synchronize_rcu_expedited() and
cond_synchronize_rcu_expedited(), which are similar to the existing
start_poll_synchronize_rcu() and cond_synchronize_rcu() functions,
respectively.

Note that although start_poll_synchronize_rcu_expedited() can be invoked
very early, the resulting expedited grace periods are not guaranteed
to start until after workqueues are fully initialized. On the other
hand, both synchronize_rcu() and synchronize_rcu_expedited() can also
be invoked very early, and the resulting grace periods will be taken
into account as they occur.

[ paulmck: Apply feedback from Neeraj Upadhyay. ]

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220121142454.1994916-1-bfoster@redhat.com/
Link: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1RNKWW9jQyfjxw2E8dsXVTdvZYh0HnYeSHDKog9jhdN8/edit?usp=sharing
Cc: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Ian Kent <raven@themaw.net>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>

show more ...

rcu: Make polled grace-period API account for expedited grace periods

Currently, this code could splat:

oldstate = get_state_synchronize_rcu();
synchronize_rcu_expedited();
WARN_ON_ONCE(!poll_st

rcu: Make polled grace-period API account for expedited grace periods

Currently, this code could splat:

oldstate = get_state_synchronize_rcu();
synchronize_rcu_expedited();
WARN_ON_ONCE(!poll_state_synchronize_rcu(oldstate));

This situation is counter-intuitive and user-unfriendly. After all, there
really was a perfectly valid full grace period right after the call to
get_state_synchronize_rcu(), so why shouldn't poll_state_synchronize_rcu()
know about it?

This commit therefore makes the polled grace-period API aware of expedited
grace periods in addition to the normal grace periods that it is already
aware of. With this change, the above code is guaranteed not to splat.

Please note that the above code can still splat due to counter wrap on the
one hand and situations involving partially overlapping normal/expedited
grace periods on the other. On 64-bit systems, the second is of course
much more likely than the first. It is possible to modify this approach
to prevent overlapping grace periods from causing splats, but only at
the expense of greatly increasing the probability of counter wrap, as
in within milliseconds on 32-bit systems and within minutes on 64-bit
systems.

This commit is in preparation for polled expedited grace periods.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220121142454.1994916-1-bfoster@redhat.com/
Link: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1RNKWW9jQyfjxw2E8dsXVTdvZYh0HnYeSHDKog9jhdN8/edit?usp=sharing
Cc: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Ian Kent <raven@themaw.net>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>

show more ...

rcu: Switch polled grace-period APIs to ->gp_seq_polled

This commit switches the existing polled grace-period APIs to use a
new ->gp_seq_polled counter in the rcu_state structure. An additional
->g

rcu: Switch polled grace-period APIs to ->gp_seq_polled

This commit switches the existing polled grace-period APIs to use a
new ->gp_seq_polled counter in the rcu_state structure. An additional
->gp_seq_polled_snap counter in that same structure allows the normal
grace period kthread to interact properly with the !SMP !PREEMPT fastpath
through synchronize_rcu(). The first of the two to note the end of a
given grace period will make knowledge of this transition available to
the polled API.

This commit is in preparation for polled expedited grace periods.

[ paulmck: Fix use of rcu_state.gp_seq_polled to start normal grace period. ]

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220121142454.1994916-1-bfoster@redhat.com/
Link: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1RNKWW9jQyfjxw2E8dsXVTdvZYh0HnYeSHDKog9jhdN8/edit?usp=sharing
Cc: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Ian Kent <raven@themaw.net>
Co-developed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>

show more ...

rcu: Add nocb_cb_kthread check to rcu_is_callbacks_kthread()

Callbacks are invoked in RCU kthreads when calbacks are offloaded
(rcu_nocbs boot parameter) or when RCU's softirq handler has been
offlo

rcu: Add nocb_cb_kthread check to rcu_is_callbacks_kthread()

Callbacks are invoked in RCU kthreads when calbacks are offloaded
(rcu_nocbs boot parameter) or when RCU's softirq handler has been
offloaded to rcuc kthreads (use_softirq==0). The current code allows
for the rcu_nocbs case but not the use_softirq case. This commit adds
support for the use_softirq case.

Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang1.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@quicinc.com>

show more ...

rcu/nocb: Add/del rdp to iterate from rcuog itself

NOCB rdp's are part of a group whose list is iterated by the
corresponding rdp leader.

This list is RCU traversed because an rdp can be either add

rcu/nocb: Add/del rdp to iterate from rcuog itself

NOCB rdp's are part of a group whose list is iterated by the
corresponding rdp leader.

This list is RCU traversed because an rdp can be either added or
deleted concurrently. Upon addition, a new iteration to the list after
a synchronization point (a pair of LOCK/UNLOCK ->nocb_gp_lock) is forced
to make sure:

1) we didn't miss a new element added in the middle of an iteration
2) we didn't ignore a whole subset of the list due to an element being
quickly deleted and then re-added.
3) we prevent from probably other surprises...

Although this layout is expected to be safe, it doesn't help anybody
to sleep well.

Simplify instead the nocb state toggling with moving the list
modification from the nocb (de-)offloading workqueue to the rcuog
kthreads instead.

Whenever the rdp leader is expected to (re-)set the SEGCBLIST_KTHREAD_GP
flag of a target rdp, the latter is queued so that the leader handles
the flag flip along with adding or deleting the target rdp to the list
to iterate. This way the list modification and iteration happen from the
same kthread and those operations can't race altogether.

As a bonus, the flags for each rdp don't need to be checked locklessly
before each iteration, which is one less opportunity to produce
nightmares.

Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Cc: Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@quicinc.com>
Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Cc: Uladzislau Rezki <uladzislau.rezki@sony.com>
Cc: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Cc: Zqiang <qiang1.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@quicinc.com>

show more ...

rcu/context-tracking: Move RCU-dynticks internal functions to context_tracking

Move the core RCU eqs/dynticks functions to context tracking so that
we can later merge all that code within context tr

rcu/context-tracking: Move RCU-dynticks internal functions to context_tracking

Move the core RCU eqs/dynticks functions to context tracking so that
we can later merge all that code within context tracking.

Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@quicinc.com>
Cc: Uladzislau Rezki <uladzislau.rezki@sony.com>
Cc: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Cc: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenz@kernel.org>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Cc: Xiongfeng Wang <wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com>
Cc: Yu Liao <liaoyu15@huawei.com>
Cc: Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com>
Cc: Paul Gortmaker<paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Cc: Alex Belits <abelits@marvell.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzju@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzju@redhat.com>

show more ...

rcu/context_tracking: Move dynticks_nmi_nesting to context tracking

The RCU eqs tracking is going to be performed by the context tracking
subsystem. The related nesting counters thus need to be move

rcu/context_tracking: Move dynticks_nmi_nesting to context tracking

The RCU eqs tracking is going to be performed by the context tracking
subsystem. The related nesting counters thus need to be moved to the
context tracking structure.

Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@quicinc.com>
Cc: Uladzislau Rezki <uladzislau.rezki@sony.com>
Cc: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Cc: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenz@kernel.org>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Cc: Xiongfeng Wang <wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com>
Cc: Yu Liao <liaoyu15@huawei.com>
Cc: Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com>
Cc: Paul Gortmaker<paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Cc: Alex Belits <abelits@marvell.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzju@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzju@redhat.com>

show more ...

rcu/context_tracking: Move dynticks_nesting to context tracking

The RCU eqs tracking is going to be performed by the context tracking
subsystem. The related nesting counters thus need to be moved to

rcu/context_tracking: Move dynticks_nesting to context tracking

The RCU eqs tracking is going to be performed by the context tracking
subsystem. The related nesting counters thus need to be moved to the
context tracking structure.

Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@quicinc.com>
Cc: Uladzislau Rezki <uladzislau.rezki@sony.com>
Cc: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Cc: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenz@kernel.org>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Cc: Xiongfeng Wang <wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com>
Cc: Yu Liao <liaoyu15@huawei.com>
Cc: Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com>
Cc: Paul Gortmaker<paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Cc: Alex Belits <abelits@marvell.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzju@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzju@redhat.com>

show more ...

rcu/context_tracking: Move dynticks counter to context tracking

In order to prepare for merging RCU dynticks counter into the context
tracking state, move the rcu_data's dynticks field to the contex

rcu/context_tracking: Move dynticks counter to context tracking

In order to prepare for merging RCU dynticks counter into the context
tracking state, move the rcu_data's dynticks field to the context
tracking structure. It will later be mixed within the context tracking
state itself.

[ paulmck: Move enum ctx_state into global scope. ]

Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@quicinc.com>
Cc: Uladzislau Rezki <uladzislau.rezki@sony.com>
Cc: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Cc: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenz@kernel.org>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Cc: Xiongfeng Wang <wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com>
Cc: Yu Liao <liaoyu15@huawei.com>
Cc: Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com>
Cc: Paul Gortmaker<paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Cc: Alex Belits <abelits@marvell.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzju@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzju@redhat.com>

show more ...

rcu: Move expedited grace period (GP) work to RT kthread_worker

Enabling CONFIG_RCU_BOOST did not reduce RCU expedited grace-period
latency because its workqueues run at SCHED_OTHER, and thus can be

rcu: Move expedited grace period (GP) work to RT kthread_worker

Enabling CONFIG_RCU_BOOST did not reduce RCU expedited grace-period
latency because its workqueues run at SCHED_OTHER, and thus can be
delayed by normal processes. This commit avoids these delays by moving
the expedited GP work items to a real-time-priority kthread_worker.

This option is controlled by CONFIG_RCU_EXP_KTHREAD and disabled by
default on PREEMPT_RT=y kernels which disable expedited grace periods
after boot by unconditionally setting rcupdate.rcu_normal_after_boot=1.

The results were evaluated on arm64 Android devices (6GB ram) running
5.10 kernel, and capturing trace data in critical user-level code.

The table below shows the resulting order-of-magnitude improvements
in synchronize_rcu_expedited() latency:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | workqueues | kthread_worker | Diff |
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Count | 725 | 688 | |
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Min Duration (ns) | 326 | 447 | 37.12% |
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Q1 (ns) | 39,428 | 38,971 | -1.16% |
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Q2 - Median (ns) | 98,225 | 69,743 | -29.00% |
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Q3 (ns) | 342,122 | 126,638 | -62.98% |
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Max Duration (ns) | 372,766,967 | 2,329,671 | -99.38% |
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Avg Duration (ns) | 2,746,353 | 151,242 | -94.49% |
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Standard Deviation (ns) | 19,327,765 | 294,408 | |
------------------------------------------------------------------------

The below table show the range of maximums/minimums for
synchronize_rcu_expedited() latency from all experiments:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | workqueues | kthread_worker | Diff |
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Total No. of Experiments | 25 | 23 | |
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Largest Maximum (ns) | 372,766,967 | 2,329,671 | -99.38% |
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Smallest Maximum (ns) | 38,819 | 86,954 | 124.00% |
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Range of Maximums (ns) | 372,728,148 | 2,242,717 | |
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Largest Minimum (ns) | 88,623 | 27,588 | -68.87% |
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Smallest Minimum (ns) | 326 | 447 | 37.12% |
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Range of Minimums (ns) | 88,297 | 27,141 | |
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Reported-by: Tim Murray <timmurray@google.com>
Reported-by: Wei Wang <wvw@google.com>
Tested-by: Kyle Lin <kylelin@google.com>
Tested-by: Chunwei Lu <chunweilu@google.com>
Tested-by: Lulu Wang <luluw@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>

show more ...

rcu: Check for jiffies going backwards

A report of a 12-jiffy normal RCU CPU stall warning raises interesting
questions about the nature of time on the offending system. This commit
instruments rcu

rcu: Check for jiffies going backwards

A report of a 12-jiffy normal RCU CPU stall warning raises interesting
questions about the nature of time on the offending system. This commit
instruments rcu_sched_clock_irq(), which is RCU's hook into the
scheduling-clock interrupt, checking for the jiffies counter going
backwards.

Reported-by: Saravanan D <sarvanand@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>

show more ...

rcu/nocb: Initialize nocb kthreads only for boot CPU prior SMP initialization

The rcu_spawn_gp_kthread() function is called as an early initcall, which
means that SMP initialization hasn't happened

rcu/nocb: Initialize nocb kthreads only for boot CPU prior SMP initialization

The rcu_spawn_gp_kthread() function is called as an early initcall, which
means that SMP initialization hasn't happened yet and only the boot CPU is
online. Therefore, create only the NOCB kthreads related to the boot CPU.

Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Cc: Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@quicinc.com>
Cc: Uladzislau Rezki <uladzislau.rezki@sony.com>
Cc: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>

show more ...

rcu: Initialize boost kthread only for boot node prior SMP initialization

The rcu_spawn_gp_kthread() function is called as an early initcall,
which means that SMP initialization hasn't happened yet

rcu: Initialize boost kthread only for boot node prior SMP initialization

The rcu_spawn_gp_kthread() function is called as an early initcall,
which means that SMP initialization hasn't happened yet and only the
boot CPU is online. Therefore, create only the boost kthread for the
leaf node of the boot CPU.

Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Cc: Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@quicinc.com>
Cc: Uladzislau Rezki <uladzislau.rezki@sony.com>
Cc: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>

show more ...

rcu/nocb: Move rcu_nocb_is_setup to rcu_state

This commit moves the RCU nocb initialization witness within rcu_state
to consolidate RCU's global state.

Reported-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel

rcu/nocb: Move rcu_nocb_is_setup to rcu_state

This commit moves the RCU nocb initialization witness within rcu_state
to consolidate RCU's global state.

Reported-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@quicinc.com>
Cc: Uladzislau Rezki <uladzislau.rezki@sony.com>
Cc: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>

show more ...

rcu: Add mutex for rcu boost kthread spawning and affinity setting

As we handle parallel CPU bringup, we will need to take care to avoid
spawning multiple boost threads, or race conditions when sett

rcu: Add mutex for rcu boost kthread spawning and affinity setting

As we handle parallel CPU bringup, we will need to take care to avoid
spawning multiple boost threads, or race conditions when setting their
affinity. Spotted by Paul McKenney.

Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>

show more ...

rcu: Make rcu_barrier() no longer block CPU-hotplug operations

This commit removes the cpus_read_lock() and cpus_read_unlock() calls
from rcu_barrier(), thus allowing CPUs to come and go during the

rcu: Make rcu_barrier() no longer block CPU-hotplug operations

This commit removes the cpus_read_lock() and cpus_read_unlock() calls
from rcu_barrier(), thus allowing CPUs to come and go during the course
of rcu_barrier() execution. Posting of the ->barrier_head callbacks does
synchronize with portions of RCU's CPU-hotplug notifiers, but these locks
are held for short time periods on both sides. Thus, full CPU-hotplug
operations could both start and finish during the execution of a given
rcu_barrier() invocation.

Additional synchronization is provided by a global ->barrier_lock.
Since the ->barrier_lock is only used during rcu_barrier() execution and
during onlining/offlining a CPU, the contention for this lock should
be low. It might be tempting to make use of a per-CPU lock just on
general principles, but straightforward attempts to do this have the
problems shown below.

Initial state: 3 CPUs present, CPU 0 and CPU1 do not have
any callback and CPU2 has callbacks.

1. CPU0 calls rcu_barrier().

2. CPU1 starts offlining for CPU2. CPU1 calls
rcutree_migrate_callbacks(). rcu_barrier_entrain() is called
from rcutree_migrate_callbacks(), with CPU2's rdp->barrier_lock.
It does not entrain ->barrier_head for CPU2, as rcu_barrier()
on CPU0 hasn't started the barrier sequence (by calling
rcu_seq_start(&rcu_state.barrier_sequence)) yet.

3. CPU0 starts new barrier sequence. It iterates over
CPU0 and CPU1, after acquiring their per-cpu ->barrier_lock
and finds 0 segcblist length. It updates ->barrier_seq_snap
for CPU0 and CPU1 and continues loop iteration to CPU2.

for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rdp->barrier_lock, flags);
if (!rcu_segcblist_n_cbs(&rdp->cblist)) {
WRITE_ONCE(rdp->barrier_seq_snap, gseq);
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rdp->barrier_lock, flags);
rcu_barrier_trace(TPS("NQ"), cpu, rcu_state.barrier_sequence);
continue;
}

4. rcutree_migrate_callbacks() completes execution on CPU1.
Segcblist len for CPU2 becomes 0.

5. The loop iteration on CPU0, checks rcu_segcblist_n_cbs(&rdp->cblist)
for CPU2 and completes the loop iteration after setting
->barrier_seq_snap.

6. As there isn't any ->barrier_head callback entrained; at
this point, rcu_barrier() in CPU0 returns.

7. The callbacks, which migrated from CPU2 to CPU1, execute.

Straightforward per-CPU locking is also subject to the following race
condition noted by Boqun Feng:

1. CPU0 calls rcu_barrier(), starting a new barrier sequence by invoking
rcu_seq_start() and init_completion(), but does not yet initialize
rcu_state.barrier_cpu_count.

2. CPU1 starts offlining for CPU2, calling rcutree_migrate_callbacks(),
which in turn calls rcu_barrier_entrain() holding CPU2's.
rdp->barrier_lock. It then entrains ->barrier_head for CPU2
and atomically increments rcu_state.barrier_cpu_count, which is
unfortunately not yet initialized to the value 2.

3. The just-entrained RCU callback is invoked. It atomically
decrements rcu_state.barrier_cpu_count and sees that it is
now zero. This callback therefore invokes complete().

4. CPU0 continues executing rcu_barrier(), but is not blocked
by its call to wait_for_completion(). This results in rcu_barrier()
returning before all pre-existing callbacks have been invoked,
which is a bug.

Therefore, synchronization is provided by rcu_state.barrier_lock,
which is also held across the initialization sequence, especially the
rcu_seq_start() and the atomic_set() that sets rcu_state.barrier_cpu_count
to the value 2. In addition, this lock is held when entraining the
rcu_barrier() callback, when deciding whether or not a CPU has callbacks
that rcu_barrier() must wait on, when setting the ->qsmaskinitnext for
incoming CPUs, and when migrating callbacks from a CPU that is going
offline.

Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Co-developed-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@quicinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@quicinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>

show more ...

rcu: Rework rcu_barrier() and callback-migration logic

This commit reworks rcu_barrier() and callback-migration logic to
permit allowing rcu_barrier() to run concurrently with CPU-hotplug
operations

rcu: Rework rcu_barrier() and callback-migration logic

This commit reworks rcu_barrier() and callback-migration logic to
permit allowing rcu_barrier() to run concurrently with CPU-hotplug
operations. The key trick is for callback migration to check to see if
an rcu_barrier() is in flight, and, if so, enqueue the ->barrier_head
callback on its behalf.

This commit adds synchronization with RCU's CPU-hotplug notifiers. Taken
together, this will permit a later commit to remove the cpus_read_lock()
and cpus_read_unlock() calls from rcu_barrier().

[ paulmck: Updated per kbuild test robot feedback. ]
[ paulmck: Updated per reviews session with Neeraj, Frederic, Uladzislau, and Boqun. ]

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>

show more ...

rcu: Kill rnp->ofl_seq and use only rcu_state.ofl_lock for exclusion

If we allow architectures to bring APs online in parallel, then we end
up requiring rcu_cpu_starting() to be reentrant. But curre

rcu: Kill rnp->ofl_seq and use only rcu_state.ofl_lock for exclusion

If we allow architectures to bring APs online in parallel, then we end
up requiring rcu_cpu_starting() to be reentrant. But currently, the
manipulation of rnp->ofl_seq is not thread-safe.

However, rnp->ofl_seq is also fairly much pointless anyway since both
rcu_cpu_starting() and rcu_report_dead() hold rcu_state.ofl_lock for
fairly much the whole time that rnp->ofl_seq is set to an odd number
to indicate that an operation is in progress.

So drop rnp->ofl_seq completely, and use only rcu_state.ofl_lock.

This has a couple of minor complexities: lockdep will complain when we
take rcu_state.ofl_lock, and currently accepts the 'excuse' of having
an odd value in rnp->ofl_seq. So switch it to an arch_spinlock_t to
avoid that false positive complaint. Since we're killing rnp->ofl_seq
of course that 'excuse' has to be changed too, so make it check for
arch_spin_is_locked(rcu_state.ofl_lock).

There's no arch_spin_lock_irqsave() so we have to manually save and
restore local interrupts around the locking.

At Paul's request based on Neeraj's analysis, make rcu_gp_init not just
wait but *exclude* any CPU online/offline activity, which was fairly
much true already by virtue of it holding rcu_state.ofl_lock.

Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>

show more ...

rcu: Add per-CPU rcuc task dumps to RCU CPU stall warnings

When the rcutree.use_softirq kernel boot parameter is set to zero, all
RCU_SOFTIRQ processing is carried out by the per-CPU rcuc kthreads.

rcu: Add per-CPU rcuc task dumps to RCU CPU stall warnings

When the rcutree.use_softirq kernel boot parameter is set to zero, all
RCU_SOFTIRQ processing is carried out by the per-CPU rcuc kthreads.
If these kthreads are being starved, quiescent states will not be
reported, which in turn means that the grace period will not end, which
can in turn trigger RCU CPU stall warnings. This commit therefore dumps
stack traces of stalled CPUs' rcuc kthreads, which can help identify
what is preventing those kthreads from running.

Suggested-by: Ammar Faizi <ammarfaizi2@gnuweeb.org>
Reviewed-by: Ammar Faizi <ammarfaizi2@gnuweeb.org>
Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang1.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>

show more ...

rcu: Remove unused rcu_state.boost

Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@quicinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>

rcu/nocb: Handle concurrent nocb kthreads creation

When multiple CPUs in the same nocb gp/cb group concurrently
come online, they might try to concurrently create the same
rcuog kthread. Fix this by

rcu/nocb: Handle concurrent nocb kthreads creation

When multiple CPUs in the same nocb gp/cb group concurrently
come online, they might try to concurrently create the same
rcuog kthread. Fix this by using nocb gp CPU's spawn mutex to
provide mutual exclusion for the rcuog kthread creation code.

[ paulmck: Whitespace fixes per kernel test robot feedback. ]

Acked-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@quicinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>

show more ...