fscrypt: Add some folio helper functions

fscrypt_is_bounce_folio() is the equivalent of fscrypt_is_bounce_page()
and fscrypt_pagecache_folio() is the equivalent of fscrypt_pagecache_page().

Signed-

fscrypt: Add some folio helper functions

fscrypt_is_bounce_folio() is the equivalent of fscrypt_is_bounce_page()
and fscrypt_pagecache_folio() is the equivalent of fscrypt_pagecache_page().

Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230324180129.1220691-3-willy@infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

show more ...

fscrypt: new helper function - fscrypt_prepare_lookup_partial()

This patch introduces a new helper function which can be used both in
lookups and in atomic_open operations by filesystems that want t

fscrypt: new helper function - fscrypt_prepare_lookup_partial()

This patch introduces a new helper function which can be used both in
lookups and in atomic_open operations by filesystems that want to handle
filename encryption and no-key dentries themselves.

The reason for this function to be used in atomic open is that this
operation can act as a lookup if handed a dentry that is negative. And in
this case we may need to set DCACHE_NOKEY_NAME.

Signed-off-by: Luís Henriques <lhenriques@suse.de>
Tested-by: Xiubo Li <xiubli@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Xiubo Li <xiubli@redhat.com>
[ebiggers: improved the function comment, and moved the function to just
below __fscrypt_prepare_lookup()]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230320220149.21863-1-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>

show more ...

fscrypt: clean up fscrypt_add_test_dummy_key()

Now that fscrypt_add_test_dummy_key() is only called by
setup_file_encryption_key() and not by the individual filesystems,
un-export it. Also change i

fscrypt: clean up fscrypt_add_test_dummy_key()

Now that fscrypt_add_test_dummy_key() is only called by
setup_file_encryption_key() and not by the individual filesystems,
un-export it. Also change its prototype to take the
fscrypt_key_specifier directly, as the caller already has it.

Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230208062107.199831-6-ebiggers@kernel.org

show more ...

fscrypt: support decrypting data from large folios

Try to make the filesystem-level decryption functions in fs/crypto/
aware of large folios. This includes making fscrypt_decrypt_bio()
support the

fscrypt: support decrypting data from large folios

Try to make the filesystem-level decryption functions in fs/crypto/
aware of large folios. This includes making fscrypt_decrypt_bio()
support the case where the bio contains large folios, and making
fscrypt_decrypt_pagecache_blocks() take a folio instead of a page.

There's no way to actually test this with large folios yet, but I've
tested that this doesn't cause any regressions.

Note that this patch just handles *decryption*, not encryption which
will be a little more difficult.

Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230127224202.355629-1-ebiggers@kernel.org

show more ...

fscrypt: fix keyring memory leak on mount failure

Commit d7e7b9af104c ("fscrypt: stop using keyrings subsystem for
fscrypt_master_key") moved the keyring destruction from __put_super() to
generic_sh

fscrypt: fix keyring memory leak on mount failure

Commit d7e7b9af104c ("fscrypt: stop using keyrings subsystem for
fscrypt_master_key") moved the keyring destruction from __put_super() to
generic_shutdown_super() so that the filesystem's block device(s) are
still available. Unfortunately, this causes a memory leak in the case
where a mount is attempted with the test_dummy_encryption mount option,
but the mount fails after the option has already been processed.

To fix this, attempt the keyring destruction in both places.

Reported-by: syzbot+104c2a89561289cec13e@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: d7e7b9af104c ("fscrypt: stop using keyrings subsystem for fscrypt_master_key")
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian Brauner (Microsoft) <brauner@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221011213838.209879-1-ebiggers@kernel.org

show more ...

fscrypt: work on block_devices instead of request_queues

request_queues are a block layer implementation detail that should not
leak into file systems. Change the fscrypt inline crypto code to
retr

fscrypt: work on block_devices instead of request_queues

request_queues are a block layer implementation detail that should not
leak into file systems. Change the fscrypt inline crypto code to
retrieve block devices instead of request_queues from the file system.
As part of that, clean up the interaction with multi-device file systems
by returning both the number of devices and the actual device array in a
single method call.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
[ebiggers: bug fixes and minor tweaks]
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220901193208.138056-4-ebiggers@kernel.org

show more ...

fscrypt: stop using keyrings subsystem for fscrypt_master_key

The approach of fs/crypto/ internally managing the fscrypt_master_key
structs as the payloads of "struct key" objects contained in a
"st

fscrypt: stop using keyrings subsystem for fscrypt_master_key

The approach of fs/crypto/ internally managing the fscrypt_master_key
structs as the payloads of "struct key" objects contained in a
"struct key" keyring has outlived its usefulness. The original idea was
to simplify the code by reusing code from the keyrings subsystem.
However, several issues have arisen that can't easily be resolved:

- When a master key struct is destroyed, blk_crypto_evict_key() must be
called on any per-mode keys embedded in it. (This started being the
case when inline encryption support was added.) Yet, the keyrings
subsystem can arbitrarily delay the destruction of keys, even past the
time the filesystem was unmounted. Therefore, currently there is no
easy way to call blk_crypto_evict_key() when a master key is
destroyed. Currently, this is worked around by holding an extra
reference to the filesystem's request_queue(s). But it was overlooked
that the request_queue reference is *not* guaranteed to pin the
corresponding blk_crypto_profile too; for device-mapper devices that
support inline crypto, it doesn't. This can cause a use-after-free.

- When the last inode that was using an incompletely-removed master key
is evicted, the master key removal is completed by removing the key
struct from the keyring. Currently this is done via key_invalidate().
Yet, key_invalidate() takes the key semaphore. This can deadlock when
called from the shrinker, since in fscrypt_ioctl_add_key(), memory is
allocated with GFP_KERNEL under the same semaphore.

- More generally, the fact that the keyrings subsystem can arbitrarily
delay the destruction of keys (via garbage collection delay, or via
random processes getting temporary key references) is undesirable, as
it means we can't strictly guarantee that all secrets are ever wiped.

- Doing the master key lookups via the keyrings subsystem results in the
key_permission LSM hook being called. fscrypt doesn't want this, as
all access control for encrypted files is designed to happen via the
files themselves, like any other files. The workaround which SELinux
users are using is to change their SELinux policy to grant key search
access to all domains. This works, but it is an odd extra step that
shouldn't really have to be done.

The fix for all these issues is to change the implementation to what I
should have done originally: don't use the keyrings subsystem to keep
track of the filesystem's fscrypt_master_key structs. Instead, just
store them in a regular kernel data structure, and rework the reference
counting, locking, and lifetime accordingly. Retain support for
RCU-mode key lookups by using a hash table. Replace fscrypt_sb_free()
with fscrypt_sb_delete(), which releases the keys synchronously and runs
a bit earlier during unmount, so that block devices are still available.

A side effect of this patch is that neither the master keys themselves
nor the filesystem keyrings will be listed in /proc/keys anymore.
("Master key users" and the master key users keyrings will still be
listed.) However, this was mostly an implementation detail, and it was
intended just for debugging purposes. I don't know of anyone using it.

This patch does *not* change how "master key users" (->mk_users) works;
that still uses the keyrings subsystem. That is still needed for key
quotas, and changing that isn't necessary to solve the issues listed
above. If we decide to change that too, it would be a separate patch.

I've marked this as fixing the original commit that added the fscrypt
keyring, but as noted above the most important issue that this patch
fixes wasn't introduced until the addition of inline encryption support.

Fixes: 22d94f493bfb ("fscrypt: add FS_IOC_ADD_ENCRYPTION_KEY ioctl")
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220901193208.138056-2-ebiggers@kernel.org

show more ...

fscrypt: change fscrypt_dio_supported() to prepare for STATX_DIOALIGN

To prepare for STATX_DIOALIGN support, make two changes to
fscrypt_dio_supported().

First, remove the filesystem-block-alignmen

fscrypt: change fscrypt_dio_supported() to prepare for STATX_DIOALIGN

To prepare for STATX_DIOALIGN support, make two changes to
fscrypt_dio_supported().

First, remove the filesystem-block-alignment check and make the
filesystems handle it instead. It previously made sense to have it in
fs/crypto/; however, to support STATX_DIOALIGN the alignment restriction
would have to be returned to filesystems. It ends up being simpler if
filesystems handle this part themselves, especially for f2fs which only
allows fs-block-aligned DIO in the first place.

Second, make fscrypt_dio_supported() work on inodes whose encryption key
hasn't been set up yet, by making it set up the key if needed. This is
required for statx(), since statx() doesn't require a file descriptor.

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220827065851.135710-4-ebiggers@kernel.org

show more ...

fscrypt: stop using PG_error to track error status

As a step towards freeing the PG_error flag for other uses, change ext4
and f2fs to stop using PG_error to track decryption errors. Instead, if
a

fscrypt: stop using PG_error to track error status

As a step towards freeing the PG_error flag for other uses, change ext4
and f2fs to stop using PG_error to track decryption errors. Instead, if
a decryption error occurs, just mark the whole bio as failed. The
coarser granularity isn't really a problem since it isn't any worse than
what the block layer provides, and errors from a multi-page readahead
aren't reported to applications unless a single-page read fails too.

Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> # for f2fs part
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220815235052.86545-2-ebiggers@kernel.org

show more ...

fscrypt: remove fscrypt_set_test_dummy_encryption()

Now that all its callers have been converted to
fscrypt_parse_test_dummy_encryption() and fscrypt_add_test_dummy_key()
instead, fscrypt_set_test_d

fscrypt: remove fscrypt_set_test_dummy_encryption()

Now that all its callers have been converted to
fscrypt_parse_test_dummy_encryption() and fscrypt_add_test_dummy_key()
instead, fscrypt_set_test_dummy_encryption() can be removed.

Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220513231605.175121-6-ebiggers@kernel.org

show more ...

fscrypt: add fscrypt_context_for_new_inode

Most filesystems just call fscrypt_set_context on new inodes, which
usually causes a setxattr. That's a bit late for ceph, which can send
along a full set

fscrypt: add fscrypt_context_for_new_inode

Most filesystems just call fscrypt_set_context on new inodes, which
usually causes a setxattr. That's a bit late for ceph, which can send
along a full set of attributes with the create request.

Doing so allows it to avoid race windows that where the new inode could
be seen by other clients without the crypto context attached. It also
avoids the separate round trip to the server.

Refactor the fscrypt code a bit to allow us to create a new crypto
context, attach it to the inode, and write it to the buffer, but without
calling set_context on it. ceph can later use this to marshal the
context into the attributes we send along with the create request.

Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Xiubo Li <xiubli@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>

show more ...

fscrypt: export fscrypt_fname_encrypt and fscrypt_fname_encrypted_size

For ceph, we want to use our own scheme for handling filenames that are
are longer than NAME_MAX after encryption and Base64 en

fscrypt: export fscrypt_fname_encrypt and fscrypt_fname_encrypted_size

For ceph, we want to use our own scheme for handling filenames that are
are longer than NAME_MAX after encryption and Base64 encoding. This
allows us to have a consistent view of the encrypted filenames for
clients that don't support fscrypt and clients that do but that don't
have the key.

Currently, fs/crypto only supports encrypting filenames using
fscrypt_setup_filename, but that also handles encoding nokey names. Ceph
can't use that because it handles nokey names in a different way.

Export fscrypt_fname_encrypt. Rename fscrypt_fname_encrypted_size to
__fscrypt_fname_encrypted_size and add a new wrapper called
fscrypt_fname_encrypted_size that takes an inode argument rather than a
pointer to a fscrypt_policy union.

Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Xiubo Li <xiubli@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>

show more ...

fscrypt: add new helper functions for test_dummy_encryption

Unfortunately the design of fscrypt_set_test_dummy_encryption() doesn't
work properly for the new mount API, as it combines too many steps

fscrypt: add new helper functions for test_dummy_encryption

Unfortunately the design of fscrypt_set_test_dummy_encryption() doesn't
work properly for the new mount API, as it combines too many steps into
one function:

- Parse the argument to test_dummy_encryption
- Check the setting against the filesystem instance
- Apply the setting to the filesystem instance

The new mount API has split these into separate steps. ext4 partially
worked around this by duplicating some of the logic, but it still had
some bugs. To address this, add some new helper functions that split up
the steps of fscrypt_set_test_dummy_encryption():

- fscrypt_parse_test_dummy_encryption()
- fscrypt_dummy_policies_equal()
- fscrypt_add_test_dummy_key()

While we're add it, also add a function fscrypt_is_dummy_policy_set()
which will be useful to avoid some #ifdef's.

Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220501050857.538984-5-ebiggers@kernel.org

show more ...

fscrypt: split up FS_CRYPTO_BLOCK_SIZE

FS_CRYPTO_BLOCK_SIZE is neither the filesystem block size nor the
granularity of encryption. Rather, it defines two logically separate
constraints that both a

fscrypt: split up FS_CRYPTO_BLOCK_SIZE

FS_CRYPTO_BLOCK_SIZE is neither the filesystem block size nor the
granularity of encryption. Rather, it defines two logically separate
constraints that both arise from the block size of the AES cipher:

- The alignment required for the lengths of file contents blocks
- The minimum input/output length for the filenames encryption modes

Since there are way too many things called the "block size", and the
connection with the AES block size is not easily understood, split
FS_CRYPTO_BLOCK_SIZE into two constants FSCRYPT_CONTENTS_ALIGNMENT and
FSCRYPT_FNAME_MIN_MSG_LEN that more clearly describe what they are.

Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220405010914.18519-1-ebiggers@kernel.org

show more ...

fscrypt: add functions for direct I/O support

Encrypted files traditionally haven't supported DIO, due to the need to
encrypt/decrypt the data. However, when the encryption is implemented
using inl

fscrypt: add functions for direct I/O support

Encrypted files traditionally haven't supported DIO, due to the need to
encrypt/decrypt the data. However, when the encryption is implemented
using inline encryption (blk-crypto) instead of the traditional
filesystem-layer encryption, it is straightforward to support DIO.

In preparation for supporting this, add the following functions:

- fscrypt_dio_supported() checks whether a DIO request is supported as
far as encryption is concerned. Encrypted files will only support DIO
when inline encryption is used and the I/O request is properly
aligned; this function checks these preconditions.

- fscrypt_limit_io_blocks() limits the length of a bio to avoid crossing
a place in the file that a bio with an encryption context cannot
cross due to a DUN discontiguity. This function is needed by
filesystems that use the iomap DIO implementation (which operates
directly on logical ranges, so it won't use fscrypt_mergeable_bio())
and that support FSCRYPT_POLICY_FLAG_IV_INO_LBLK_32.

Co-developed-by: Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220128233940.79464-2-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>

show more ...

fscrypt: remove fscrypt_operations::max_namelen

The max_namelen field is unnecessary, as it is set to 255 (NAME_MAX) on
all filesystems that support fscrypt (or plan to support fscrypt). For
simpli

fscrypt: remove fscrypt_operations::max_namelen

The max_namelen field is unnecessary, as it is set to 255 (NAME_MAX) on
all filesystems that support fscrypt (or plan to support fscrypt). For
simplicity, just use NAME_MAX directly instead.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210909184513.139281-1-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>

show more ...

fscrypt: fix keyring memory leak on mount failure

commit ccd30a476f8e864732de220bd50e6f372f5ebcab upstream.

Commit d7e7b9af104c ("fscrypt: stop using keyrings subsystem for
fscrypt_master_key") mov

fscrypt: fix keyring memory leak on mount failure

commit ccd30a476f8e864732de220bd50e6f372f5ebcab upstream.

Commit d7e7b9af104c ("fscrypt: stop using keyrings subsystem for
fscrypt_master_key") moved the keyring destruction from __put_super() to
generic_shutdown_super() so that the filesystem's block device(s) are
still available. Unfortunately, this causes a memory leak in the case
where a mount is attempted with the test_dummy_encryption mount option,
but the mount fails after the option has already been processed.

To fix this, attempt the keyring destruction in both places.

Reported-by: syzbot+104c2a89561289cec13e@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: d7e7b9af104c ("fscrypt: stop using keyrings subsystem for fscrypt_master_key")
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian Brauner (Microsoft) <brauner@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221011213838.209879-1-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

show more ...

fscrypt: stop using keyrings subsystem for fscrypt_master_key

commit d7e7b9af104c7b389a0c21eb26532511bce4b510 upstream.

The approach of fs/crypto/ internally managing the fscrypt_master_key
structs

fscrypt: stop using keyrings subsystem for fscrypt_master_key

commit d7e7b9af104c7b389a0c21eb26532511bce4b510 upstream.

The approach of fs/crypto/ internally managing the fscrypt_master_key
structs as the payloads of "struct key" objects contained in a
"struct key" keyring has outlived its usefulness. The original idea was
to simplify the code by reusing code from the keyrings subsystem.
However, several issues have arisen that can't easily be resolved:

- When a master key struct is destroyed, blk_crypto_evict_key() must be
called on any per-mode keys embedded in it. (This started being the
case when inline encryption support was added.) Yet, the keyrings
subsystem can arbitrarily delay the destruction of keys, even past the
time the filesystem was unmounted. Therefore, currently there is no
easy way to call blk_crypto_evict_key() when a master key is
destroyed. Currently, this is worked around by holding an extra
reference to the filesystem's request_queue(s). But it was overlooked
that the request_queue reference is *not* guaranteed to pin the
corresponding blk_crypto_profile too; for device-mapper devices that
support inline crypto, it doesn't. This can cause a use-after-free.

- When the last inode that was using an incompletely-removed master key
is evicted, the master key removal is completed by removing the key
struct from the keyring. Currently this is done via key_invalidate().
Yet, key_invalidate() takes the key semaphore. This can deadlock when
called from the shrinker, since in fscrypt_ioctl_add_key(), memory is
allocated with GFP_KERNEL under the same semaphore.

- More generally, the fact that the keyrings subsystem can arbitrarily
delay the destruction of keys (via garbage collection delay, or via
random processes getting temporary key references) is undesirable, as
it means we can't strictly guarantee that all secrets are ever wiped.

- Doing the master key lookups via the keyrings subsystem results in the
key_permission LSM hook being called. fscrypt doesn't want this, as
all access control for encrypted files is designed to happen via the
files themselves, like any other files. The workaround which SELinux
users are using is to change their SELinux policy to grant key search
access to all domains. This works, but it is an odd extra step that
shouldn't really have to be done.

The fix for all these issues is to change the implementation to what I
should have done originally: don't use the keyrings subsystem to keep
track of the filesystem's fscrypt_master_key structs. Instead, just
store them in a regular kernel data structure, and rework the reference
counting, locking, and lifetime accordingly. Retain support for
RCU-mode key lookups by using a hash table. Replace fscrypt_sb_free()
with fscrypt_sb_delete(), which releases the keys synchronously and runs
a bit earlier during unmount, so that block devices are still available.

A side effect of this patch is that neither the master keys themselves
nor the filesystem keyrings will be listed in /proc/keys anymore.
("Master key users" and the master key users keyrings will still be
listed.) However, this was mostly an implementation detail, and it was
intended just for debugging purposes. I don't know of anyone using it.

This patch does *not* change how "master key users" (->mk_users) works;
that still uses the keyrings subsystem. That is still needed for key
quotas, and changing that isn't necessary to solve the issues listed
above. If we decide to change that too, it would be a separate patch.

I've marked this as fixing the original commit that added the fscrypt
keyring, but as noted above the most important issue that this patch
fixes wasn't introduced until the addition of inline encryption support.

Fixes: 22d94f493bfb ("fscrypt: add FS_IOC_ADD_ENCRYPTION_KEY ioctl")
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220901193208.138056-2-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

show more ...

fscrypt: fix keyring memory leak on mount failure

commit ccd30a476f8e864732de220bd50e6f372f5ebcab upstream.

Commit d7e7b9af104c ("fscrypt: stop using keyrings subsystem for
fscrypt_master_key") mov

fscrypt: fix keyring memory leak on mount failure

commit ccd30a476f8e864732de220bd50e6f372f5ebcab upstream.

Commit d7e7b9af104c ("fscrypt: stop using keyrings subsystem for
fscrypt_master_key") moved the keyring destruction from __put_super() to
generic_shutdown_super() so that the filesystem's block device(s) are
still available. Unfortunately, this causes a memory leak in the case
where a mount is attempted with the test_dummy_encryption mount option,
but the mount fails after the option has already been processed.

To fix this, attempt the keyring destruction in both places.

Reported-by: syzbot+104c2a89561289cec13e@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: d7e7b9af104c ("fscrypt: stop using keyrings subsystem for fscrypt_master_key")
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian Brauner (Microsoft) <brauner@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221011213838.209879-1-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

show more ...

fscrypt: stop using keyrings subsystem for fscrypt_master_key

commit d7e7b9af104c7b389a0c21eb26532511bce4b510 upstream.

The approach of fs/crypto/ internally managing the fscrypt_master_key
structs

fscrypt: stop using keyrings subsystem for fscrypt_master_key

commit d7e7b9af104c7b389a0c21eb26532511bce4b510 upstream.

The approach of fs/crypto/ internally managing the fscrypt_master_key
structs as the payloads of "struct key" objects contained in a
"struct key" keyring has outlived its usefulness. The original idea was
to simplify the code by reusing code from the keyrings subsystem.
However, several issues have arisen that can't easily be resolved:

- When a master key struct is destroyed, blk_crypto_evict_key() must be
called on any per-mode keys embedded in it. (This started being the
case when inline encryption support was added.) Yet, the keyrings
subsystem can arbitrarily delay the destruction of keys, even past the
time the filesystem was unmounted. Therefore, currently there is no
easy way to call blk_crypto_evict_key() when a master key is
destroyed. Currently, this is worked around by holding an extra
reference to the filesystem's request_queue(s). But it was overlooked
that the request_queue reference is *not* guaranteed to pin the
corresponding blk_crypto_profile too; for device-mapper devices that
support inline crypto, it doesn't. This can cause a use-after-free.

- When the last inode that was using an incompletely-removed master key
is evicted, the master key removal is completed by removing the key
struct from the keyring. Currently this is done via key_invalidate().
Yet, key_invalidate() takes the key semaphore. This can deadlock when
called from the shrinker, since in fscrypt_ioctl_add_key(), memory is
allocated with GFP_KERNEL under the same semaphore.

- More generally, the fact that the keyrings subsystem can arbitrarily
delay the destruction of keys (via garbage collection delay, or via
random processes getting temporary key references) is undesirable, as
it means we can't strictly guarantee that all secrets are ever wiped.

- Doing the master key lookups via the keyrings subsystem results in the
key_permission LSM hook being called. fscrypt doesn't want this, as
all access control for encrypted files is designed to happen via the
files themselves, like any other files. The workaround which SELinux
users are using is to change their SELinux policy to grant key search
access to all domains. This works, but it is an odd extra step that
shouldn't really have to be done.

The fix for all these issues is to change the implementation to what I
should have done originally: don't use the keyrings subsystem to keep
track of the filesystem's fscrypt_master_key structs. Instead, just
store them in a regular kernel data structure, and rework the reference
counting, locking, and lifetime accordingly. Retain support for
RCU-mode key lookups by using a hash table. Replace fscrypt_sb_free()
with fscrypt_sb_delete(), which releases the keys synchronously and runs
a bit earlier during unmount, so that block devices are still available.

A side effect of this patch is that neither the master keys themselves
nor the filesystem keyrings will be listed in /proc/keys anymore.
("Master key users" and the master key users keyrings will still be
listed.) However, this was mostly an implementation detail, and it was
intended just for debugging purposes. I don't know of anyone using it.

This patch does *not* change how "master key users" (->mk_users) works;
that still uses the keyrings subsystem. That is still needed for key
quotas, and changing that isn't necessary to solve the issues listed
above. If we decide to change that too, it would be a separate patch.

I've marked this as fixing the original commit that added the fscrypt
keyring, but as noted above the most important issue that this patch
fixes wasn't introduced until the addition of inline encryption support.

Fixes: 22d94f493bfb ("fscrypt: add FS_IOC_ADD_ENCRYPTION_KEY ioctl")
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220901193208.138056-2-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

show more ...

fscrypt: fix keyring memory leak on mount failure

commit ccd30a476f8e864732de220bd50e6f372f5ebcab upstream.

Commit d7e7b9af104c ("fscrypt: stop using keyrings subsystem for
fscrypt_master_key") mov

fscrypt: fix keyring memory leak on mount failure

commit ccd30a476f8e864732de220bd50e6f372f5ebcab upstream.

Commit d7e7b9af104c ("fscrypt: stop using keyrings subsystem for
fscrypt_master_key") moved the keyring destruction from __put_super() to
generic_shutdown_super() so that the filesystem's block device(s) are
still available. Unfortunately, this causes a memory leak in the case
where a mount is attempted with the test_dummy_encryption mount option,
but the mount fails after the option has already been processed.

To fix this, attempt the keyring destruction in both places.

Reported-by: syzbot+104c2a89561289cec13e@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: d7e7b9af104c ("fscrypt: stop using keyrings subsystem for fscrypt_master_key")
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian Brauner (Microsoft) <brauner@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221011213838.209879-1-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

show more ...

fscrypt: stop using keyrings subsystem for fscrypt_master_key

commit d7e7b9af104c7b389a0c21eb26532511bce4b510 upstream.

The approach of fs/crypto/ internally managing the fscrypt_master_key
structs

fscrypt: stop using keyrings subsystem for fscrypt_master_key

commit d7e7b9af104c7b389a0c21eb26532511bce4b510 upstream.

The approach of fs/crypto/ internally managing the fscrypt_master_key
structs as the payloads of "struct key" objects contained in a
"struct key" keyring has outlived its usefulness. The original idea was
to simplify the code by reusing code from the keyrings subsystem.
However, several issues have arisen that can't easily be resolved:

- When a master key struct is destroyed, blk_crypto_evict_key() must be
called on any per-mode keys embedded in it. (This started being the
case when inline encryption support was added.) Yet, the keyrings
subsystem can arbitrarily delay the destruction of keys, even past the
time the filesystem was unmounted. Therefore, currently there is no
easy way to call blk_crypto_evict_key() when a master key is
destroyed. Currently, this is worked around by holding an extra
reference to the filesystem's request_queue(s). But it was overlooked
that the request_queue reference is *not* guaranteed to pin the
corresponding blk_crypto_profile too; for device-mapper devices that
support inline crypto, it doesn't. This can cause a use-after-free.

- When the last inode that was using an incompletely-removed master key
is evicted, the master key removal is completed by removing the key
struct from the keyring. Currently this is done via key_invalidate().
Yet, key_invalidate() takes the key semaphore. This can deadlock when
called from the shrinker, since in fscrypt_ioctl_add_key(), memory is
allocated with GFP_KERNEL under the same semaphore.

- More generally, the fact that the keyrings subsystem can arbitrarily
delay the destruction of keys (via garbage collection delay, or via
random processes getting temporary key references) is undesirable, as
it means we can't strictly guarantee that all secrets are ever wiped.

- Doing the master key lookups via the keyrings subsystem results in the
key_permission LSM hook being called. fscrypt doesn't want this, as
all access control for encrypted files is designed to happen via the
files themselves, like any other files. The workaround which SELinux
users are using is to change their SELinux policy to grant key search
access to all domains. This works, but it is an odd extra step that
shouldn't really have to be done.

The fix for all these issues is to change the implementation to what I
should have done originally: don't use the keyrings subsystem to keep
track of the filesystem's fscrypt_master_key structs. Instead, just
store them in a regular kernel data structure, and rework the reference
counting, locking, and lifetime accordingly. Retain support for
RCU-mode key lookups by using a hash table. Replace fscrypt_sb_free()
with fscrypt_sb_delete(), which releases the keys synchronously and runs
a bit earlier during unmount, so that block devices are still available.

A side effect of this patch is that neither the master keys themselves
nor the filesystem keyrings will be listed in /proc/keys anymore.
("Master key users" and the master key users keyrings will still be
listed.) However, this was mostly an implementation detail, and it was
intended just for debugging purposes. I don't know of anyone using it.

This patch does *not* change how "master key users" (->mk_users) works;
that still uses the keyrings subsystem. That is still needed for key
quotas, and changing that isn't necessary to solve the issues listed
above. If we decide to change that too, it would be a separate patch.

I've marked this as fixing the original commit that added the fscrypt
keyring, but as noted above the most important issue that this patch
fixes wasn't introduced until the addition of inline encryption support.

Fixes: 22d94f493bfb ("fscrypt: add FS_IOC_ADD_ENCRYPTION_KEY ioctl")
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220901193208.138056-2-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

show more ...

fscrypt: fix keyring memory leak on mount failure

commit ccd30a476f8e864732de220bd50e6f372f5ebcab upstream.

Commit d7e7b9af104c ("fscrypt: stop using keyrings subsystem for
fscrypt_master_key") mov

fscrypt: fix keyring memory leak on mount failure

commit ccd30a476f8e864732de220bd50e6f372f5ebcab upstream.

Commit d7e7b9af104c ("fscrypt: stop using keyrings subsystem for
fscrypt_master_key") moved the keyring destruction from __put_super() to
generic_shutdown_super() so that the filesystem's block device(s) are
still available. Unfortunately, this causes a memory leak in the case
where a mount is attempted with the test_dummy_encryption mount option,
but the mount fails after the option has already been processed.

To fix this, attempt the keyring destruction in both places.

Reported-by: syzbot+104c2a89561289cec13e@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: d7e7b9af104c ("fscrypt: stop using keyrings subsystem for fscrypt_master_key")
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian Brauner (Microsoft) <brauner@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221011213838.209879-1-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

show more ...

fscrypt: stop using keyrings subsystem for fscrypt_master_key

commit d7e7b9af104c7b389a0c21eb26532511bce4b510 upstream.

The approach of fs/crypto/ internally managing the fscrypt_master_key
structs

fscrypt: stop using keyrings subsystem for fscrypt_master_key

commit d7e7b9af104c7b389a0c21eb26532511bce4b510 upstream.

The approach of fs/crypto/ internally managing the fscrypt_master_key
structs as the payloads of "struct key" objects contained in a
"struct key" keyring has outlived its usefulness. The original idea was
to simplify the code by reusing code from the keyrings subsystem.
However, several issues have arisen that can't easily be resolved:

- When a master key struct is destroyed, blk_crypto_evict_key() must be
called on any per-mode keys embedded in it. (This started being the
case when inline encryption support was added.) Yet, the keyrings
subsystem can arbitrarily delay the destruction of keys, even past the
time the filesystem was unmounted. Therefore, currently there is no
easy way to call blk_crypto_evict_key() when a master key is
destroyed. Currently, this is worked around by holding an extra
reference to the filesystem's request_queue(s). But it was overlooked
that the request_queue reference is *not* guaranteed to pin the
corresponding blk_crypto_profile too; for device-mapper devices that
support inline crypto, it doesn't. This can cause a use-after-free.

- When the last inode that was using an incompletely-removed master key
is evicted, the master key removal is completed by removing the key
struct from the keyring. Currently this is done via key_invalidate().
Yet, key_invalidate() takes the key semaphore. This can deadlock when
called from the shrinker, since in fscrypt_ioctl_add_key(), memory is
allocated with GFP_KERNEL under the same semaphore.

- More generally, the fact that the keyrings subsystem can arbitrarily
delay the destruction of keys (via garbage collection delay, or via
random processes getting temporary key references) is undesirable, as
it means we can't strictly guarantee that all secrets are ever wiped.

- Doing the master key lookups via the keyrings subsystem results in the
key_permission LSM hook being called. fscrypt doesn't want this, as
all access control for encrypted files is designed to happen via the
files themselves, like any other files. The workaround which SELinux
users are using is to change their SELinux policy to grant key search
access to all domains. This works, but it is an odd extra step that
shouldn't really have to be done.

The fix for all these issues is to change the implementation to what I
should have done originally: don't use the keyrings subsystem to keep
track of the filesystem's fscrypt_master_key structs. Instead, just
store them in a regular kernel data structure, and rework the reference
counting, locking, and lifetime accordingly. Retain support for
RCU-mode key lookups by using a hash table. Replace fscrypt_sb_free()
with fscrypt_sb_delete(), which releases the keys synchronously and runs
a bit earlier during unmount, so that block devices are still available.

A side effect of this patch is that neither the master keys themselves
nor the filesystem keyrings will be listed in /proc/keys anymore.
("Master key users" and the master key users keyrings will still be
listed.) However, this was mostly an implementation detail, and it was
intended just for debugging purposes. I don't know of anyone using it.

This patch does *not* change how "master key users" (->mk_users) works;
that still uses the keyrings subsystem. That is still needed for key
quotas, and changing that isn't necessary to solve the issues listed
above. If we decide to change that too, it would be a separate patch.

I've marked this as fixing the original commit that added the fscrypt
keyring, but as noted above the most important issue that this patch
fixes wasn't introduced until the addition of inline encryption support.

Fixes: 22d94f493bfb ("fscrypt: add FS_IOC_ADD_ENCRYPTION_KEY ioctl")
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220901193208.138056-2-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

show more ...

fscrypt: fix keyring memory leak on mount failure

commit ccd30a476f8e864732de220bd50e6f372f5ebcab upstream.

Commit d7e7b9af104c ("fscrypt: stop using keyrings subsystem for
fscrypt_master_key") mov

fscrypt: fix keyring memory leak on mount failure

commit ccd30a476f8e864732de220bd50e6f372f5ebcab upstream.

Commit d7e7b9af104c ("fscrypt: stop using keyrings subsystem for
fscrypt_master_key") moved the keyring destruction from __put_super() to
generic_shutdown_super() so that the filesystem's block device(s) are
still available. Unfortunately, this causes a memory leak in the case
where a mount is attempted with the test_dummy_encryption mount option,
but the mount fails after the option has already been processed.

To fix this, attempt the keyring destruction in both places.

Reported-by: syzbot+104c2a89561289cec13e@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: d7e7b9af104c ("fscrypt: stop using keyrings subsystem for fscrypt_master_key")
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian Brauner (Microsoft) <brauner@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221011213838.209879-1-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

show more ...