bpf: keep track of max number of bpf_loop callback iterations

commit bb124da69c47dd98d69361ec13244ece50bec63e upstream.

In some cases verifier can't infer convergence of the bpf_loop()
iteration. E

bpf: keep track of max number of bpf_loop callback iterations

commit bb124da69c47dd98d69361ec13244ece50bec63e upstream.

In some cases verifier can't infer convergence of the bpf_loop()
iteration. E.g. for the following program:

static int cb(__u32 idx, struct num_context* ctx)
{
ctx->i++;
return 0;
}

SEC("?raw_tp")
int prog(void *_)
{
struct num_context ctx = { .i = 0 };
__u8 choice_arr[2] = { 0, 1 };

bpf_loop(2, cb, &ctx, 0);
return choice_arr[ctx.i];
}

Each 'cb' simulation would eventually return to 'prog' and reach
'return choice_arr[ctx.i]' statement. At which point ctx.i would be
marked precise, thus forcing verifier to track multitude of separate
states with {.i=0}, {.i=1}, ... at bpf_loop() callback entry.

This commit allows "brute force" handling for such cases by limiting
number of callback body simulations using 'umax' value of the first
bpf_loop() parameter.

For this, extend bpf_func_state with 'callback_depth' field.
Increment this field when callback visiting state is pushed to states
traversal stack. For frame #N it's 'callback_depth' field counts how
many times callback with frame depth N+1 had been executed.
Use bpf_func_state specifically to allow independent tracking of
callback depths when multiple nested bpf_loop() calls are present.

Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231121020701.26440-11-eddyz87@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

show more ...

bpf: verify callbacks as if they are called unknown number of times

commit ab5cfac139ab8576fb54630d4cca23c3e690ee90 upstream.

Prior to this patch callbacks were handled as regular function calls,
e

bpf: verify callbacks as if they are called unknown number of times

commit ab5cfac139ab8576fb54630d4cca23c3e690ee90 upstream.

Prior to this patch callbacks were handled as regular function calls,
execution of callback body was modeled exactly once.
This patch updates callbacks handling logic as follows:
- introduces a function push_callback_call() that schedules callback
body verification in env->head stack;
- updates prepare_func_exit() to reschedule callback body verification
upon BPF_EXIT;
- as calls to bpf_*_iter_next(), calls to callback invoking functions
are marked as checkpoints;
- is_state_visited() is updated to stop callback based iteration when
some identical parent state is found.

Paths with callback function invoked zero times are now verified first,
which leads to necessity to modify some selftests:
- the following negative tests required adding release/unlock/drop
calls to avoid previously masked unrelated error reports:
- cb_refs.c:underflow_prog
- exceptions_fail.c:reject_rbtree_add_throw
- exceptions_fail.c:reject_with_cp_reference
- the following precision tracking selftests needed change in expected
log trace:
- verifier_subprog_precision.c:callback_result_precise
(note: r0 precision is no longer propagated inside callback and
I think this is a correct behavior)
- verifier_subprog_precision.c:parent_callee_saved_reg_precise_with_callback
- verifier_subprog_precision.c:parent_stack_slot_precise_with_callback

Reported-by: Andrew Werner <awerner32@gmail.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CA+vRuzPChFNXmouzGG+wsy=6eMcfr1mFG0F3g7rbg-sedGKW3w@mail.gmail.com/
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231121020701.26440-7-eddyz87@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

show more ...

bpf: correct loop detection for iterators convergence

commit 2a0992829ea3864939d917a5c7b48be6629c6217 upstream.

It turns out that .branches > 0 in is_state_visited() is not a
sufficient condition t

bpf: correct loop detection for iterators convergence

commit 2a0992829ea3864939d917a5c7b48be6629c6217 upstream.

It turns out that .branches > 0 in is_state_visited() is not a
sufficient condition to identify if two verifier states form a loop
when iterators convergence is computed. This commit adds logic to
distinguish situations like below:

(I) initial (II) initial
| |
V V
.---------> hdr ..
| | |
| V V
| .------... .------..
| | | | |
| V V V V
| ... ... .-> hdr ..
| | | | | |
| V V | V V
| succ <- cur | succ <- cur
| | | |
| V | V
| ... | ...
| | | |
'----' '----'

For both (I) and (II) successor 'succ' of the current state 'cur' was
previously explored and has branches count at 0. However, loop entry
'hdr' corresponding to 'succ' might be a part of current DFS path.
If that is the case 'succ' and 'cur' are members of the same loop
and have to be compared exactly.

Co-developed-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com>
Co-developed-by: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231024000917.12153-6-eddyz87@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

show more ...

bpf: exact states comparison for iterator convergence checks

commit 2793a8b015f7f1caadb9bce9c63dc659f7522676 upstream.

Convergence for open coded iterators is computed in is_state_visited()
by exam

bpf: exact states comparison for iterator convergence checks

commit 2793a8b015f7f1caadb9bce9c63dc659f7522676 upstream.

Convergence for open coded iterators is computed in is_state_visited()
by examining states with branches count > 1 and using states_equal().
states_equal() computes sub-state relation using read and precision marks.
Read and precision marks are propagated from children states,
thus are not guaranteed to be complete inside a loop when branches
count > 1. This could be demonstrated using the following unsafe program:

1. r7 = -16
2. r6 = bpf_get_prandom_u32()
3. while (bpf_iter_num_next(&fp[-8])) {
4. if (r6 != 42) {
5. r7 = -32
6. r6 = bpf_get_prandom_u32()
7. continue
8. }
9. r0 = r10
10. r0 += r7
11. r8 = *(u64 *)(r0 + 0)
12. r6 = bpf_get_prandom_u32()
13. }

Here verifier would first visit path 1-3, create a checkpoint at 3
with r7=-16, continue to 4-7,3 with r7=-32.

Because instructions at 9-12 had not been visitied yet existing
checkpoint at 3 does not have read or precision mark for r7.
Thus states_equal() would return true and verifier would discard
current state, thus unsafe memory access at 11 would not be caught.

This commit fixes this loophole by introducing exact state comparisons
for iterator convergence logic:
- registers are compared using regs_exact() regardless of read or
precision marks;
- stack slots have to have identical type.

Unfortunately, this is too strict even for simple programs like below:

i = 0;
while(iter_next(&it))
i++;

At each iteration step i++ would produce a new distinct state and
eventually instruction processing limit would be reached.

To avoid such behavior speculatively forget (widen) range for
imprecise scalar registers, if those registers were not precise at the
end of the previous iteration and do not match exactly.

This a conservative heuristic that allows to verify wide range of
programs, however it precludes verification of programs that conjure
an imprecise value on the first loop iteration and use it as precise
on the second.

Test case iter_task_vma_for_each() presents one of such cases:

unsigned int seen = 0;
...
bpf_for_each(task_vma, vma, task, 0) {
if (seen >= 1000)
break;
...
seen++;
}

Here clang generates the following code:

<LBB0_4>:
24: r8 = r6 ; stash current value of
... body ... 'seen'
29: r1 = r10
30: r1 += -0x8
31: call bpf_iter_task_vma_next
32: r6 += 0x1 ; seen++;
33: if r0 == 0x0 goto +0x2 <LBB0_6> ; exit on next() == NULL
34: r7 += 0x10
35: if r8 < 0x3e7 goto -0xc <LBB0_4> ; loop on seen < 1000

<LBB0_6>:
... exit ...

Note that counter in r6 is copied to r8 and then incremented,
conditional jump is done using r8. Because of this precision mark for
r6 lags one state behind of precision mark on r8 and widening logic
kicks in.

Adding barrier_var(seen) after conditional is sufficient to force
clang use the same register for both counting and conditional jump.

This issue was discussed in the thread [1] which was started by
Andrew Werner <awerner32@gmail.com> demonstrating a similar bug
in callback functions handling. The callbacks would be addressed
in a followup patch.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/97a90da09404c65c8e810cf83c94ac703705dc0e.camel@gmail.com/

Co-developed-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com>
Co-developed-by: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231024000917.12153-4-eddyz87@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

show more ...

bpf: Consider non-owning refs trusted

Recent discussions around default kptr "trustedness" led to changes such
as commit 6fcd486b3a0a ("bpf: Refactor RCU enforcement in the
verifier."). One of the c

bpf: Consider non-owning refs trusted

Recent discussions around default kptr "trustedness" led to changes such
as commit 6fcd486b3a0a ("bpf: Refactor RCU enforcement in the
verifier."). One of the conclusions of those discussions, as expressed
in code and comments in that patch, is that we'd like to move away from
'raw' PTR_TO_BTF_ID without some type flag or other register state
indicating trustedness. Although PTR_TRUSTED and PTR_UNTRUSTED flags mark
this state explicitly, the verifier currently considers trustedness
implied by other register state. For example, owning refs to graph
collection nodes must have a nonzero ref_obj_id, so they pass the
is_trusted_reg check despite having no explicit PTR_{UN}TRUSTED flag.
This patch makes trustedness of non-owning refs to graph collection
nodes explicit as well.

By definition, non-owning refs are currently trusted. Although the ref
has no control over pointee lifetime, due to non-owning ref clobbering
rules (see invalidate_non_owning_refs) dereferencing a non-owning ref is
safe in the critical section controlled by bpf_spin_lock associated with
its owning collection.

Note that the previous statement does not hold true for nodes with shared
ownership due to the use-after-free issue that this series is
addressing. True shared ownership was disabled by commit 7deca5eae833
("bpf: Disable bpf_refcount_acquire kfunc calls until race conditions are fixed"),
though, so the statement holds for now. Further patches in the series will change
the trustedness state of non-owning refs before re-enabling
bpf_refcount_acquire.

Let's add NON_OWN_REF type flag to BPF_REG_TRUSTED_MODIFIERS such that a
non-owning ref reg state would pass is_trusted_reg check. Somewhat
surprisingly, this doesn't result in any change to user-visible
functionality elsewhere in the verifier: graph collection nodes are all
marked MEM_ALLOC, which tends to be handled in separate codepaths from
"raw" PTR_TO_BTF_ID. Regardless, let's be explicit here and document the
current state of things before changing it elsewhere in the series.

Signed-off-by: Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230821193311.3290257-3-davemarchevsky@fb.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

show more ...

bpf: Verify scalar ids mapping in regsafe() using check_ids()

Make sure that the following unsafe example is rejected by verifier:

1: r9 = ... some pointer with range X ...
2: r6 = ... unbound scal

bpf: Verify scalar ids mapping in regsafe() using check_ids()

Make sure that the following unsafe example is rejected by verifier:

1: r9 = ... some pointer with range X ...
2: r6 = ... unbound scalar ID=a ...
3: r7 = ... unbound scalar ID=b ...
4: if (r6 > r7) goto +1
5: r6 = r7
6: if (r6 > X) goto ...
--- checkpoint ---
7: r9 += r7
8: *(u64 *)r9 = Y

This example is unsafe because not all execution paths verify r7 range.
Because of the jump at (4) the verifier would arrive at (6) in two states:
I. r6{.id=b}, r7{.id=b} via path 1-6;
II. r6{.id=a}, r7{.id=b} via path 1-4, 6.

Currently regsafe() does not call check_ids() for scalar registers,
thus from POV of regsafe() states (I) and (II) are identical. If the
path 1-6 is taken by verifier first, and checkpoint is created at (6)
the path [1-4, 6] would be considered safe.

Changes in this commit:
- check_ids() is modified to disallow mapping multiple old_id to the
same cur_id.
- check_scalar_ids() is added, unlike check_ids() it treats ID zero as
a unique scalar ID.
- check_scalar_ids() needs to generate temporary unique IDs, field
'tmp_id_gen' is added to bpf_verifier_env::idmap_scratch to
facilitate this.
- regsafe() is updated to:
- use check_scalar_ids() for precise scalar registers.
- compare scalar registers using memcmp only for explore_alu_limits
branch. This simplifies control flow for scalar case, and has no
measurable performance impact.
- check_alu_op() is updated to avoid generating bpf_reg_state::id for
constant scalar values when processing BPF_MOV. ID is needed to
propagate range information for identical values, but there is
nothing to propagate for constants.

Fixes: 75748837b7e5 ("bpf: Propagate scalar ranges through register assignments.")
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230613153824.3324830-4-eddyz87@gmail.com

show more ...

bpf: Use scalar ids in mark_chain_precision()

Change mark_chain_precision() to track precision in situations
like below:

r2 = unknown value
...
--- state #0 ---
...
r1 = r2

bpf: Use scalar ids in mark_chain_precision()

Change mark_chain_precision() to track precision in situations
like below:

r2 = unknown value
...
--- state #0 ---
...
r1 = r2 // r1 and r2 now share the same ID
...
--- state #1 {r1.id = A, r2.id = A} ---
...
if (r2 > 10) goto exit; // find_equal_scalars() assigns range to r1
...
--- state #2 {r1.id = A, r2.id = A} ---
r3 = r10
r3 += r1 // need to mark both r1 and r2

At the beginning of the processing of each state, ensure that if a
register with a scalar ID is marked as precise, all registers sharing
this ID are also marked as precise.

This property would be used by a follow-up change in regsafe().

Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230613153824.3324830-2-eddyz87@gmail.com

show more ...

bpf: improve precision backtrack logging

Add helper to format register and stack masks in more human-readable
format. Adjust logging a bit during backtrack propagation and especially
during forcing

bpf: improve precision backtrack logging

Add helper to format register and stack masks in more human-readable
format. Adjust logging a bit during backtrack propagation and especially
during forcing precision fallback logic to make it clearer what's going
on (with log_level=2, of course), and also start reporting affected
frame depth. This is in preparation for having more than one active
frame later when precision propagation between subprog calls is added.

Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230505043317.3629845-5-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

show more ...

bpf: encapsulate precision backtracking bookkeeping

Add struct backtrack_state and straightforward API around it to keep
track of register and stack masks used and maintained during precision
backtr

bpf: encapsulate precision backtracking bookkeeping

Add struct backtrack_state and straightforward API around it to keep
track of register and stack masks used and maintained during precision
backtracking process. Having this logic separately allow to keep
high-level backtracking algorithm cleaner, but also it sets us up to
cleanly keep track of register and stack masks per frame, allowing (with
some further logic adjustments) to perform precision backpropagation
across multiple frames (i.e., subprog calls).

Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230505043317.3629845-4-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

show more ...

bpf: Migrate bpf_rbtree_add and bpf_list_push_{front,back} to possibly fail

Consider this code snippet:

struct node {
long key;
bpf_list_node l;
bpf_rb_node r;
bpf_refcount ref;

bpf: Migrate bpf_rbtree_add and bpf_list_push_{front,back} to possibly fail

Consider this code snippet:

struct node {
long key;
bpf_list_node l;
bpf_rb_node r;
bpf_refcount ref;
}

int some_bpf_prog(void *ctx)
{
struct node *n = bpf_obj_new(/*...*/), *m;

bpf_spin_lock(&glock);

bpf_rbtree_add(&some_tree, &n->r, /* ... */);
m = bpf_refcount_acquire(n);
bpf_rbtree_add(&other_tree, &m->r, /* ... */);

bpf_spin_unlock(&glock);

/* ... */
}

After bpf_refcount_acquire, n and m point to the same underlying memory,
and that node's bpf_rb_node field is being used by the some_tree insert,
so overwriting it as a result of the second insert is an error. In order
to properly support refcounted nodes, the rbtree and list insert
functions must be allowed to fail. This patch adds such support.

The kfuncs bpf_rbtree_add, bpf_list_push_{front,back} are modified to
return an int indicating success/failure, with 0 -> success, nonzero ->
failure.

bpf_obj_drop on failure
=======================

Currently the only reason an insert can fail is the example above: the
bpf_{list,rb}_node is already in use. When such a failure occurs, the
insert kfuncs will bpf_obj_drop the input node. This allows the insert
operations to logically fail without changing their verifier owning ref
behavior, namely the unconditional release_reference of the input
owning ref.

With insert that always succeeds, ownership of the node is always passed
to the collection, since the node always ends up in the collection.

With a possibly-failed insert w/ bpf_obj_drop, ownership of the node
is always passed either to the collection (success), or to bpf_obj_drop
(failure). Regardless, it's correct to continue unconditionally
releasing the input owning ref, as something is always taking ownership
from the calling program on insert.

Keeping owning ref behavior unchanged results in a nice default UX for
insert functions that can fail. If the program's reaction to a failed
insert is "fine, just get rid of this owning ref for me and let me go
on with my business", then there's no reason to check for failure since
that's default behavior. e.g.:

long important_failures = 0;

int some_bpf_prog(void *ctx)
{
struct node *n, *m, *o; /* all bpf_obj_new'd */

bpf_spin_lock(&glock);
bpf_rbtree_add(&some_tree, &n->node, /* ... */);
bpf_rbtree_add(&some_tree, &m->node, /* ... */);
if (bpf_rbtree_add(&some_tree, &o->node, /* ... */)) {
important_failures++;
}
bpf_spin_unlock(&glock);
}

If we instead chose to pass ownership back to the program on failed
insert - by returning NULL on success or an owning ref on failure -
programs would always have to do something with the returned ref on
failure. The most likely action is probably "I'll just get rid of this
owning ref and go about my business", which ideally would look like:

if (n = bpf_rbtree_add(&some_tree, &n->node, /* ... */))
bpf_obj_drop(n);

But bpf_obj_drop isn't allowed in a critical section and inserts must
occur within one, so in reality error handling would become a
hard-to-parse mess.

For refcounted nodes, we can replicate the "pass ownership back to
program on failure" logic with this patch's semantics, albeit in an ugly
way:

struct node *n = bpf_obj_new(/* ... */), *m;

bpf_spin_lock(&glock);

m = bpf_refcount_acquire(n);
if (bpf_rbtree_add(&some_tree, &n->node, /* ... */)) {
/* Do something with m */
}

bpf_spin_unlock(&glock);
bpf_obj_drop(m);

bpf_refcount_acquire is used to simulate "return owning ref on failure".
This should be an uncommon occurrence, though.

Addition of two verifier-fixup'd args to collection inserts
===========================================================

The actual bpf_obj_drop kfunc is
bpf_obj_drop_impl(void *, struct btf_struct_meta *), with bpf_obj_drop
macro populating the second arg with 0 and the verifier later filling in
the arg during insn fixup.

Because bpf_rbtree_add and bpf_list_push_{front,back} now might do
bpf_obj_drop, these kfuncs need a btf_struct_meta parameter that can be
passed to bpf_obj_drop_impl.

Similarly, because the 'node' param to those insert functions is the
bpf_{list,rb}_node within the node type, and bpf_obj_drop expects a
pointer to the beginning of the node, the insert functions need to be
able to find the beginning of the node struct. A second
verifier-populated param is necessary: the offset of {list,rb}_node within the
node type.

These two new params allow the insert kfuncs to correctly call
__bpf_obj_drop_impl:

beginning_of_node = bpf_rb_node_ptr - offset
if (already_inserted)
__bpf_obj_drop_impl(beginning_of_node, btf_struct_meta->record);

Similarly to other kfuncs with "hidden" verifier-populated params, the
insert functions are renamed with _impl prefix and a macro is provided
for common usage. For example, bpf_rbtree_add kfunc is now
bpf_rbtree_add_impl and bpf_rbtree_add is now a macro which sets
"hidden" args to 0.

Due to the two new args BPF progs will need to be recompiled to work
with the new _impl kfuncs.

This patch also rewrites the "hidden argument" explanation to more
directly say why the BPF program writer doesn't need to populate the
arguments with anything meaningful.

How does this new logic affect non-owning references?
=====================================================

Currently, non-owning refs are valid until the end of the critical
section in which they're created. We can make this guarantee because, if
a non-owning ref exists, the referent was added to some collection. The
collection will drop() its nodes when it goes away, but it can't go away
while our program is accessing it, so that's not a problem. If the
referent is removed from the collection in the same CS that it was added
in, it can't be bpf_obj_drop'd until after CS end. Those are the only
two ways to free the referent's memory and neither can happen until
after the non-owning ref's lifetime ends.

On first glance, having these collection insert functions potentially
bpf_obj_drop their input seems like it breaks the "can't be
bpf_obj_drop'd until after CS end" line of reasoning. But we care about
the memory not being _freed_ until end of CS end, and a previous patch
in the series modified bpf_obj_drop such that it doesn't free refcounted
nodes until refcount == 0. So the statement can be more accurately
rewritten as "can't be free'd until after CS end".

We can prove that this rewritten statement holds for any non-owning
reference produced by collection insert functions:

* If the input to the insert function is _not_ refcounted
* We have an owning reference to the input, and can conclude it isn't
in any collection
* Inserting a node in a collection turns owning refs into
non-owning, and since our input type isn't refcounted, there's no
way to obtain additional owning refs to the same underlying
memory
* Because our node isn't in any collection, the insert operation
cannot fail, so bpf_obj_drop will not execute
* If bpf_obj_drop is guaranteed not to execute, there's no risk of
memory being free'd

* Otherwise, the input to the insert function is refcounted
* If the insert operation fails due to the node's list_head or rb_root
already being in some collection, there was some previous successful
insert which passed refcount to the collection
* We have an owning reference to the input, it must have been
acquired via bpf_refcount_acquire, which bumped the refcount
* refcount must be >= 2 since there's a valid owning reference and the
node is already in a collection
* Insert triggering bpf_obj_drop will decr refcount to >= 1, never
resulting in a free

So although we may do bpf_obj_drop during the critical section, this
will never result in memory being free'd, and no changes to non-owning
ref logic are needed in this patch.

Signed-off-by: Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230415201811.343116-6-davemarchevsky@fb.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

show more ...

bpf: Simplify internal verifier log interface

Simplify internal verifier log API down to bpf_vlog_init() and
bpf_vlog_finalize(). The former handles input arguments validation in
one place and makes

bpf: Simplify internal verifier log interface

Simplify internal verifier log API down to bpf_vlog_init() and
bpf_vlog_finalize(). The former handles input arguments validation in
one place and makes it easier to change it. The latter subsumes -ENOSPC
(truncation) and -EFAULT handling and simplifies both caller's code
(bpf_check() and btf_parse()).

For btf_parse(), this patch also makes sure that verifier log
finalization happens even if there is some error condition during BTF
verification process prior to normal finalization step.

Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Lorenz Bauer <lmb@isovalent.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230406234205.323208-14-andrii@kernel.org

show more ...

bpf: Keep track of total log content size in both fixed and rolling modes

Change how we do accounting in BPF_LOG_FIXED mode and adopt log->end_pos
as *logical* log position. This means that we can g

bpf: Keep track of total log content size in both fixed and rolling modes

Change how we do accounting in BPF_LOG_FIXED mode and adopt log->end_pos
as *logical* log position. This means that we can go beyond physical log
buffer size now and be able to tell what log buffer size should be to
fit entire log contents without -ENOSPC.

To do this for BPF_LOG_FIXED mode, we need to remove a short-circuiting
logic of not vsnprintf()'ing further log content once we filled up
user-provided buffer, which is done by bpf_verifier_log_needed() checks.
We modify these checks to always keep going if log->level is non-zero
(i.e., log is requested), even if log->ubuf was NULL'ed out due to
copying data to user-space, or if entire log buffer is physically full.
We adopt bpf_verifier_vlog() routine to work correctly with
log->ubuf == NULL condition, performing log formatting into temporary
kernel buffer, doing all the necessary accounting, but just avoiding
copying data out if buffer is full or NULL'ed out.

With these changes, it's now possible to do this sort of determination of
log contents size in both BPF_LOG_FIXED and default rolling log mode.
We need to keep in mind bpf_vlog_reset(), though, which shrinks log
contents after successful verification of a particular code path. This
log reset means that log->end_pos isn't always increasing, so to return
back to users what should be the log buffer size to fit all log content
without causing -ENOSPC even in the presence of log resetting, we need
to keep maximum over "lifetime" of logging. We do this accounting in
bpf_vlog_update_len_max() helper.

A related and subtle aspect is that with this logical log->end_pos even in
BPF_LOG_FIXED mode we could temporary "overflow" buffer, but then reset
it back with bpf_vlog_reset() to a position inside user-supplied
log_buf. In such situation we still want to properly maintain
terminating zero. We will eventually return -ENOSPC even if final log
buffer is small (we detect this through log->len_max check). This
behavior is simpler to reason about and is consistent with current
behavior of verifier log. Handling of this required a small addition to
bpf_vlog_reset() logic to avoid doing put_user() beyond physical log
buffer dimensions.

Another issue to keep in mind is that we limit log buffer size to 32-bit
value and keep such log length as u32, but theoretically verifier could
produce huge log stretching beyond 4GB. Instead of keeping (and later
returning) 64-bit log length, we cap it at UINT_MAX. Current UAPI makes
it impossible to specify log buffer size bigger than 4GB anyways, so we
don't really loose anything here and keep everything consistently 32-bit
in UAPI. This property will be utilized in next patch.

Doing the same determination of maximum log buffer for rolling mode is
trivial, as log->end_pos and log->start_pos are already logical
positions, so there is nothing new there.

These changes do incidentally fix one small issue with previous logging
logic. Previously, if use provided log buffer of size N, and actual log
output was exactly N-1 bytes + terminating \0, kernel logic coun't
distinguish this condition from log truncation scenario which would end
up with truncated log contents of N-1 bytes + terminating \0 as well.

But now with log->end_pos being logical position that could go beyond
actual log buffer size, we can distinguish these two conditions, which
we do in this patch. This plays nicely with returning log_size_actual
(implemented in UAPI in the next patch), as we can now guarantee that if
user takes such log_size_actual and provides log buffer of that exact
size, they will not get -ENOSPC in return.

All in all, all these changes do conceptually unify fixed and rolling
log modes much better, and allow a nice feature requested by users:
knowing what should be the size of the buffer to avoid -ENOSPC.

We'll plumb this through the UAPI and the code in the next patch.

Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Lorenz Bauer <lmb@isovalent.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230406234205.323208-12-andrii@kernel.org

show more ...

bpf: Switch BPF verifier log to be a rotating log by default

Currently, if user-supplied log buffer to collect BPF verifier log turns
out to be too small to contain full log, bpf() syscall returns -

bpf: Switch BPF verifier log to be a rotating log by default

Currently, if user-supplied log buffer to collect BPF verifier log turns
out to be too small to contain full log, bpf() syscall returns -ENOSPC,
fails BPF program verification/load, and preserves first N-1 bytes of
the verifier log (where N is the size of user-supplied buffer).

This is problematic in a bunch of common scenarios, especially when
working with real-world BPF programs that tend to be pretty complex as
far as verification goes and require big log buffers. Typically, it's
when debugging tricky cases at log level 2 (verbose). Also, when BPF program
is successfully validated, log level 2 is the only way to actually see
verifier state progression and all the important details.

Even with log level 1, it's possible to get -ENOSPC even if the final
verifier log fits in log buffer, if there is a code path that's deep
enough to fill up entire log, even if normally it would be reset later
on (there is a logic to chop off successfully validated portions of BPF
verifier log).

In short, it's not always possible to pre-size log buffer. Also, what's
worse, in practice, the end of the log most often is way more important
than the beginning, but verifier stops emitting log as soon as initial
log buffer is filled up.

This patch switches BPF verifier log behavior to effectively behave as
rotating log. That is, if user-supplied log buffer turns out to be too
short, verifier will keep overwriting previously written log,
effectively treating user's log buffer as a ring buffer. -ENOSPC is
still going to be returned at the end, to notify user that log contents
was truncated, but the important last N bytes of the log would be
returned, which might be all that user really needs. This consistent
-ENOSPC behavior, regardless of rotating or fixed log behavior, allows
to prevent backwards compatibility breakage. The only user-visible
change is which portion of verifier log user ends up seeing *if buffer
is too small*. Given contents of verifier log itself is not an ABI,
there is no breakage due to this behavior change. Specialized tools that
rely on specific contents of verifier log in -ENOSPC scenario are
expected to be easily adapted to accommodate old and new behaviors.

Importantly, though, to preserve good user experience and not require
every user-space application to adopt to this new behavior, before
exiting to user-space verifier will rotate log (in place) to make it
start at the very beginning of user buffer as a continuous
zero-terminated string. The contents will be a chopped off N-1 last
bytes of full verifier log, of course.

Given beginning of log is sometimes important as well, we add
BPF_LOG_FIXED (which equals 8) flag to force old behavior, which allows
tools like veristat to request first part of verifier log, if necessary.
BPF_LOG_FIXED flag is also a simple and straightforward way to check if
BPF verifier supports rotating behavior.

On the implementation side, conceptually, it's all simple. We maintain
64-bit logical start and end positions. If we need to truncate the log,
start position will be adjusted accordingly to lag end position by
N bytes. We then use those logical positions to calculate their matching
actual positions in user buffer and handle wrap around the end of the
buffer properly. Finally, right before returning from bpf_check(), we
rotate user log buffer contents in-place as necessary, to make log
contents contiguous. See comments in relevant functions for details.

Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Reviewed-by: Lorenz Bauer <lmb@isovalent.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230406234205.323208-4-andrii@kernel.org

show more ...

bpf: Split off basic BPF verifier log into separate file

kernel/bpf/verifier.c file is large and growing larger all the time. So
it's good to start splitting off more or less self-contained parts in

bpf: Split off basic BPF verifier log into separate file

kernel/bpf/verifier.c file is large and growing larger all the time. So
it's good to start splitting off more or less self-contained parts into
separate files to keep source code size (somewhat) somewhat under
control.

This patch is a one step in this direction, moving some of BPF verifier log
routines into a separate kernel/bpf/log.c. Right now it's most low-level
and isolated routines to append data to log, reset log to previous
position, etc. Eventually we could probably move verifier state
printing logic here as well, but this patch doesn't attempt to do that
yet.

Subsequent patches will add more logic to verifier log management, so
having basics in a separate file will make sure verifier.c doesn't grow
more with new changes.

Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Lorenz Bauer <lmb@isovalent.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230406234205.323208-2-andrii@kernel.org

show more ...

bpf: ensure state checkpointing at iter_next() call sites

State equivalence check and checkpointing performed in is_state_visited()
employs certain heuristics to try to save memory by avoiding state

bpf: ensure state checkpointing at iter_next() call sites

State equivalence check and checkpointing performed in is_state_visited()
employs certain heuristics to try to save memory by avoiding state checkpoints
if not enough jumps and instructions happened since last checkpoint. This leads
to unpredictability of whether a particular instruction will be checkpointed
and how regularly. While normally this is not causing much problems (except
inconveniences for predictable verifier tests, which we overcome with
BPF_F_TEST_STATE_FREQ flag), turns out it's not the case for open-coded
iterators.

Checking and saving state checkpoints at iter_next() call is crucial for fast
convergence of open-coded iterator loop logic, so we need to force it. If we
don't do that, is_state_visited() might skip saving a checkpoint, causing
unnecessarily long sequence of not checkpointed instructions and jumps, leading
to exhaustion of jump history buffer, and potentially other undesired outcomes.
It is expected that with correct open-coded iterators convergence will happen
quickly, so we don't run a risk of exhausting memory.

This patch adds, in addition to prune and jump instruction marks, also a
"forced checkpoint" mark, and makes sure that any iter_next() call instruction
is marked as such.

Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230310060149.625887-1-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

show more ...

bpf: add support for open-coded iterator loops

Teach verifier about the concept of the open-coded (or inline) iterators.

This patch adds generic iterator loop verification logic, new STACK_ITER
sta

bpf: add support for open-coded iterator loops

Teach verifier about the concept of the open-coded (or inline) iterators.

This patch adds generic iterator loop verification logic, new STACK_ITER
stack slot type to contain iterator state, and necessary kfunc plumbing
for iterator's constructor, destructor and next methods. Next patch
implements first specific iterator (numbers iterator for implementing
for() loop logic). Such split allows to have more focused commits for
verifier logic and separate commit that we could point later to
demonstrating what does it take to add a new kind of iterator.

Each kind of iterator has its own associated struct bpf_iter_<type>,
where <type> denotes a specific type of iterator. struct bpf_iter_<type>
state is supposed to live on BPF program stack, so there will be no way
to change its size later on without breaking backwards compatibility, so
choose wisely! But given this struct is specific to a given <type> of
iterator, this allows a lot of flexibility: simple iterators could be
fine with just one stack slot (8 bytes), like numbers iterator in the
next patch, while some other more complicated iterators might need way
more to keep their iterator state. Either way, such design allows to
avoid runtime memory allocations, which otherwise would be necessary if
we fixed on-the-stack size and it turned out to be too small for a given
iterator implementation.

The way BPF verifier logic is implemented, there are no artificial
restrictions on a number of active iterators, it should work correctly
using multiple active iterators at the same time. This also means you
can have multiple nested iteration loops. struct bpf_iter_<type>
reference can be safely passed to subprograms as well.

General flow is easiest to demonstrate with a simple example using
number iterator implemented in next patch. Here's the simplest possible
loop:

struct bpf_iter_num it;
int *v;

bpf_iter_num_new(&it, 2, 5);
while ((v = bpf_iter_num_next(&it))) {
bpf_printk("X = %d", *v);
}
bpf_iter_num_destroy(&it);

Above snippet should output "X = 2", "X = 3", "X = 4". Note that 5 is
exclusive and is not returned. This matches similar APIs (e.g., slices
in Go or Rust) that implement a range of elements, where end index is
non-inclusive.

In the above example, we see a trio of function:
- constructor, bpf_iter_num_new(), which initializes iterator state
(struct bpf_iter_num it) on the stack. If any of the input arguments
are invalid, constructor should make sure to still initialize it such
that subsequent bpf_iter_num_next() calls will return NULL. I.e., on
error, return error and construct empty iterator.
- next method, bpf_iter_num_next(), which accepts pointer to iterator
state and produces an element. Next method should always return
a pointer. The contract between BPF verifier is that next method will
always eventually return NULL when elements are exhausted. Once NULL is
returned, subsequent next calls should keep returning NULL. In the
case of numbers iterator, bpf_iter_num_next() returns a pointer to an int
(storage for this integer is inside the iterator state itself),
which can be dereferenced after corresponding NULL check.
- once done with the iterator, it's mandated that user cleans up its
state with the call to destructor, bpf_iter_num_destroy() in this
case. Destructor frees up any resources and marks stack space used by
struct bpf_iter_num as usable for something else.

Any other iterator implementation will have to implement at least these
three methods. It is enforced that for any given type of iterator only
applicable constructor/destructor/next are callable. I.e., verifier
ensures you can't pass number iterator state into, say, cgroup
iterator's next method.

It is important to keep the naming pattern consistent to be able to
create generic macros to help with BPF iter usability. E.g., one
of the follow up patches adds generic bpf_for_each() macro to bpf_misc.h
in selftests, which allows to utilize iterator "trio" nicely without
having to code the above somewhat tedious loop explicitly every time.
This is enforced at kfunc registration point by one of the previous
patches in this series.

At the implementation level, iterator state tracking for verification
purposes is very similar to dynptr. We add STACK_ITER stack slot type,
reserve necessary number of slots, depending on
sizeof(struct bpf_iter_<type>), and keep track of necessary extra state
in the "main" slot, which is marked with non-zero ref_obj_id. Other
slots are also marked as STACK_ITER, but have zero ref_obj_id. This is
simpler than having a separate "is_first_slot" flag.

Another big distinction is that STACK_ITER is *always refcounted*, which
simplifies implementation without sacrificing usability. So no need for
extra "iter_id", no need to anticipate reuse of STACK_ITER slots for new
constructors, etc. Keeping it simple here.

As far as the verification logic goes, there are two extensive comments:
in process_iter_next_call() and iter_active_depths_differ() explaining
some important and sometimes subtle aspects. Please refer to them for
details.

But from 10,000-foot point of view, next methods are the points of
forking a verification state, which are conceptually similar to what
verifier is doing when validating conditional jump. We branch out at
a `call bpf_iter_<type>_next` instruction and simulate two outcomes:
NULL (iteration is done) and non-NULL (new element is returned). NULL is
simulated first and is supposed to reach exit without looping. After
that non-NULL case is validated and it either reaches exit (for trivial
examples with no real loop), or reaches another `call bpf_iter_<type>_next`
instruction with the state equivalent to already (partially) validated
one. State equivalency at that point means we technically are going to
be looping forever without "breaking out" out of established "state
envelope" (i.e., subsequent iterations don't add any new knowledge or
constraints to the verifier state, so running 1, 2, 10, or a million of
them doesn't matter). But taking into account the contract stating that
iterator next method *has to* return NULL eventually, we can conclude
that loop body is safe and will eventually terminate. Given we validated
logic outside of the loop (NULL case), and concluded that loop body is
safe (though potentially looping many times), verifier can claim safety
of the overall program logic.

The rest of the patch is necessary plumbing for state tracking, marking,
validation, and necessary further kfunc plumbing to allow implementing
iterator constructor, destructor, and next methods.

Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230308184121.1165081-4-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

show more ...

bpf: add iterator kfuncs registration and validation logic

Add ability to register kfuncs that implement BPF open-coded iterator
contract and enforce naming and function proto convention. Enforcemen

bpf: add iterator kfuncs registration and validation logic

Add ability to register kfuncs that implement BPF open-coded iterator
contract and enforce naming and function proto convention. Enforcement
happens at the time of kfunc registration and significantly simplifies
the rest of iterators logic in the verifier.

More details follow in subsequent patches, but we enforce the following
conditions.

All kfuncs (constructor, next, destructor) have to be named consistenly
as bpf_iter_<type>_{new,next,destroy}(), respectively. <type> represents
iterator type, and iterator state should be represented as a matching
`struct bpf_iter_<type>` state type. Also, all iter kfuncs should have
a pointer to this `struct bpf_iter_<type>` as the very first argument.

Additionally:
- Constructor, i.e., bpf_iter_<type>_new(), can have arbitrary extra
number of arguments. Return type is not enforced either.
- Next method, i.e., bpf_iter_<type>_next(), has to return a pointer
type and should have exactly one argument: `struct bpf_iter_<type> *`
(const/volatile/restrict and typedefs are ignored).
- Destructor, i.e., bpf_iter_<type>_destroy(), should return void and
should have exactly one argument, similar to the next method.
- struct bpf_iter_<type> size is enforced to be positive and
a multiple of 8 bytes (to fit stack slots correctly).

Such strictness and consistency allows to build generic helpers
abstracting important, but boilerplate, details to be able to use
open-coded iterators effectively and ergonomically (see bpf_for_each()
in subsequent patches). It also simplifies the verifier logic in some
places. At the same time, this doesn't hurt generality of possible
iterator implementations. Win-win.

Constructor kfunc is marked with a new KF_ITER_NEW flags, next method is
marked with KF_ITER_NEXT (and should also have KF_RET_NULL, of course),
while destructor kfunc is marked as KF_ITER_DESTROY.

Additionally, we add a trivial kfunc name validation: it should be
a valid non-NULL and non-empty string.

Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230308184121.1165081-3-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

show more ...

bpf: Refactor RCU enforcement in the verifier.

bpf_rcu_read_lock/unlock() are only available in clang compiled kernels. Lack
of such key mechanism makes it impossible for sleepable bpf programs to u

bpf: Refactor RCU enforcement in the verifier.

bpf_rcu_read_lock/unlock() are only available in clang compiled kernels. Lack
of such key mechanism makes it impossible for sleepable bpf programs to use RCU
pointers.

Allow bpf_rcu_read_lock/unlock() in GCC compiled kernels (though GCC doesn't
support btf_type_tag yet) and allowlist certain field dereferences in important
data structures like tast_struct, cgroup, socket that are used by sleepable
programs either as RCU pointer or full trusted pointer (which is valid outside
of RCU CS). Use BTF_TYPE_SAFE_RCU and BTF_TYPE_SAFE_TRUSTED macros for such
tagging. They will be removed once GCC supports btf_type_tag.

With that refactor check_ptr_to_btf_access(). Make it strict in enforcing
PTR_TRUSTED and PTR_UNTRUSTED while deprecating old PTR_TO_BTF_ID without
modifier flags. There is a chance that this strict enforcement might break
existing programs (especially on GCC compiled kernels), but this cleanup has to
start sooner than later. Note PTR_TO_CTX access still yields old deprecated
PTR_TO_BTF_ID. Once it's converted to strict PTR_TRUSTED or PTR_UNTRUSTED the
kfuncs and helpers will be able to default to KF_TRUSTED_ARGS. KF_RCU will
remain as a weaker version of KF_TRUSTED_ARGS where obj refcnt could be 0.

Adjust rcu_read_lock selftest to run on gcc and clang compiled kernels.

Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230303041446.3630-7-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com

show more ...

bpf: Refactor process_dynptr_func

This change cleans up process_dynptr_func's flow to be more intuitive
and updates some comments with more context.

Signed-off-by: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.

bpf: Refactor process_dynptr_func

This change cleans up process_dynptr_func's flow to be more intuitive
and updates some comments with more context.

Signed-off-by: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230301154953.641654-3-joannelkoong@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

show more ...

bpf: Migrate release_on_unlock logic to non-owning ref semantics

This patch introduces non-owning reference semantics to the verifier,
specifically linked_list API kfunc handling. release_on_unlock

bpf: Migrate release_on_unlock logic to non-owning ref semantics

This patch introduces non-owning reference semantics to the verifier,
specifically linked_list API kfunc handling. release_on_unlock logic for
refs is refactored - with small functional changes - to implement these
semantics, and bpf_list_push_{front,back} are migrated to use them.

When a list node is pushed to a list, the program still has a pointer to
the node:

n = bpf_obj_new(typeof(*n));

bpf_spin_lock(&l);
bpf_list_push_back(&l, n);
/* n still points to the just-added node */
bpf_spin_unlock(&l);

What the verifier considers n to be after the push, and thus what can be
done with n, are changed by this patch.

Common properties both before/after this patch:
* After push, n is only a valid reference to the node until end of
critical section
* After push, n cannot be pushed to any list
* After push, the program can read the node's fields using n

Before:
* After push, n retains the ref_obj_id which it received on
bpf_obj_new, but the associated bpf_reference_state's
release_on_unlock field is set to true
* release_on_unlock field and associated logic is used to implement
"n is only a valid ref until end of critical section"
* After push, n cannot be written to, the node must be removed from
the list before writing to its fields
* After push, n is marked PTR_UNTRUSTED

After:
* After push, n's ref is released and ref_obj_id set to 0. NON_OWN_REF
type flag is added to reg's type, indicating that it's a non-owning
reference.
* NON_OWN_REF flag and logic is used to implement "n is only a
valid ref until end of critical section"
* n can be written to (except for special fields e.g. bpf_list_node,
timer, ...)

Summary of specific implementation changes to achieve the above:

* release_on_unlock field, ref_set_release_on_unlock helper, and logic
to "release on unlock" based on that field are removed

* The anonymous active_lock struct used by bpf_verifier_state is
pulled out into a named struct bpf_active_lock.

* NON_OWN_REF type flag is introduced along with verifier logic
changes to handle non-owning refs

* Helpers are added to use NON_OWN_REF flag to implement non-owning
ref semantics as described above
* invalidate_non_owning_refs - helper to clobber all non-owning refs
matching a particular bpf_active_lock identity. Replaces
release_on_unlock logic in process_spin_lock.
* ref_set_non_owning - set NON_OWN_REF type flag after doing some
sanity checking
* ref_convert_owning_non_owning - convert owning reference w/
specified ref_obj_id to non-owning references. Set NON_OWN_REF
flag for each reg with that ref_obj_id and 0-out its ref_obj_id

* Update linked_list selftests to account for minor semantic
differences introduced by this patch
* Writes to a release_on_unlock node ref are not allowed, while
writes to non-owning reference pointees are. As a result the
linked_list "write after push" failure tests are no longer scenarios
that should fail.
* The test##missing_lock##op and test##incorrect_lock##op
macro-generated failure tests need to have a valid node argument in
order to have the same error output as before. Otherwise
verification will fail early and the expected error output won't be seen.

Signed-off-by: Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230212092715.1422619-2-davemarchevsky@fb.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

show more ...

bpf: Invalidate slices on destruction of dynptrs on stack

The previous commit implemented destroy_if_dynptr_stack_slot. It
destroys the dynptr which given spi belongs to, but still doesn't
invalidat

bpf: Invalidate slices on destruction of dynptrs on stack

The previous commit implemented destroy_if_dynptr_stack_slot. It
destroys the dynptr which given spi belongs to, but still doesn't
invalidate the slices that belong to such a dynptr. While for the case
of referenced dynptr, we don't allow their overwrite and return an error
early, we still allow it and destroy the dynptr for unreferenced dynptr.

To be able to enable precise and scoped invalidation of dynptr slices in
this case, we must be able to associate the source dynptr of slices that
have been obtained using bpf_dynptr_data. When doing destruction, only
slices belonging to the dynptr being destructed should be invalidated,
and nothing else. Currently, dynptr slices belonging to different
dynptrs are indistinguishible.

Hence, allocate a unique id to each dynptr (CONST_PTR_TO_DYNPTR and
those on stack). This will be stored as part of reg->id. Whenever using
bpf_dynptr_data, transfer this unique dynptr id to the returned
PTR_TO_MEM_OR_NULL slice pointer, and store it in a new per-PTR_TO_MEM
dynptr_id register state member.

Finally, after establishing such a relationship between dynptrs and
their slices, implement precise invalidation logic that only invalidates
slices belong to the destroyed dynptr in destroy_if_dynptr_stack_slot.

Acked-by: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230121002241.2113993-5-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

show more ...

bpf: reorganize struct bpf_reg_state fields

Move id and ref_obj_id fields after scalar data section (var_off and
ranges). This is necessary to simplify next patch which will change
regsafe()'s logic

bpf: reorganize struct bpf_reg_state fields

Move id and ref_obj_id fields after scalar data section (var_off and
ranges). This is necessary to simplify next patch which will change
regsafe()'s logic to be safer, as it makes the contents that has to be
an exact match (type-specific parts, off, type, and var_off+ranges)
a single sequential block of memory, while id and ref_obj_id should
always be remapped and thus can't be memcp()'ed.

There are few places that assume that var_off is after id/ref_obj_id to
clear out id/ref_obj_id with the single memset(0). These are changed to
explicitly zero-out id/ref_obj_id fields. Other places are adjusted to
preserve exact byte-by-byte comparison behavior.

No functional changes.

Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221223054921.958283-3-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

show more ...

bpf: states_equal() must build idmap for all function frames

verifier.c:states_equal() must maintain register ID mapping across all
function frames. Otherwise the following example might be erroneou

bpf: states_equal() must build idmap for all function frames

verifier.c:states_equal() must maintain register ID mapping across all
function frames. Otherwise the following example might be erroneously
marked as safe:

main:
fp[-24] = map_lookup_elem(...) ; frame[0].fp[-24].id == 1
fp[-32] = map_lookup_elem(...) ; frame[0].fp[-32].id == 2
r1 = &fp[-24]
r2 = &fp[-32]
call foo()
r0 = 0
exit

foo:
0: r9 = r1
1: r8 = r2
2: r7 = ktime_get_ns()
3: r6 = ktime_get_ns()
4: if (r6 > r7) goto skip_assign
5: r9 = r8

skip_assign: ; <--- checkpoint
6: r9 = *r9 ; (a) frame[1].r9.id == 2
; (b) frame[1].r9.id == 1

7: if r9 == 0 goto exit: ; mark_ptr_or_null_regs() transfers != 0 info
; for all regs sharing ID:
; (a) r9 != 0 => &frame[0].fp[-32] != 0
; (b) r9 != 0 => &frame[0].fp[-24] != 0

8: r8 = *r8 ; (a) r8 == &frame[0].fp[-32]
; (b) r8 == &frame[0].fp[-32]
9: r0 = *r8 ; (a) safe
; (b) unsafe

exit:
10: exit

While processing call to foo() verifier considers the following
execution paths:

(a) 0-10
(b) 0-4,6-10
(There is also path 0-7,10 but it is not interesting for the issue at
hand. (a) is verified first.)

Suppose that checkpoint is created at (6) when path (a) is verified,
next path (b) is verified and (6) is reached.

If states_equal() maintains separate 'idmap' for each frame the
mapping at (6) for frame[1] would be empty and
regsafe(r9)::check_ids() would add a pair 2->1 and return true,
which is an error.

If states_equal() maintains single 'idmap' for all frames the mapping
at (6) would be { 1->1, 2->2 } and regsafe(r9)::check_ids() would
return false when trying to add a pair 2->1.

This issue was suggested in the following discussion:
https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAEf4BzbFB5g4oUfyxk9rHy-PJSLQ3h8q9mV=rVoXfr_JVm8+1Q@mail.gmail.com/

Suggested-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221209135733.28851-4-eddyz87@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

show more ...

bpf: Refactor ARG_PTR_TO_DYNPTR checks into process_dynptr_func

ARG_PTR_TO_DYNPTR is akin to ARG_PTR_TO_TIMER, ARG_PTR_TO_KPTR, where
the underlying register type is subjected to more special checks

bpf: Refactor ARG_PTR_TO_DYNPTR checks into process_dynptr_func

ARG_PTR_TO_DYNPTR is akin to ARG_PTR_TO_TIMER, ARG_PTR_TO_KPTR, where
the underlying register type is subjected to more special checks to
determine the type of object represented by the pointer and its state
consistency.

Move dynptr checks to their own 'process_dynptr_func' function so that
is consistent and in-line with existing code. This also makes it easier
to reuse this code for kfunc handling.

Then, reuse this consolidated function in kfunc dynptr handling too.
Note that for kfuncs, the arg_type constraint of DYNPTR_TYPE_LOCAL has
been lifted.

Acked-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
Acked-by: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221207204141.308952-2-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

show more ...

bpf: decouple prune and jump points

BPF verifier marks some instructions as prune points. Currently these
prune points serve two purposes.

It's a point where verifier tries to find previously verif

bpf: decouple prune and jump points

BPF verifier marks some instructions as prune points. Currently these
prune points serve two purposes.

It's a point where verifier tries to find previously verified state and
check current state's equivalence to short circuit verification for
current code path.

But also currently it's a point where jump history, used for precision
backtracking, is updated. This is done so that non-linear flow of
execution could be properly backtracked.

Such coupling is coincidental and unnecessary. Some prune points are not
part of some non-linear jump path, so don't need update of jump history.
On the other hand, not all instructions which have to be recorded in
jump history necessarily are good prune points.

This patch splits prune and jump points into independent flags.
Currently all prune points are marked as jump points to minimize amount
of changes in this patch, but next patch will perform some optimization
of prune vs jmp point placement.

No functional changes are intended.

Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221206233345.438540-2-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

show more ...