ext4: add correct group descriptors and reserved GDT blocks to system zone

When setup_system_zone, flex_bg is not initialized so it is always 1.
Use a new helper function, ext4_num_base_meta_blocks(

ext4: add correct group descriptors and reserved GDT blocks to system zone

When setup_system_zone, flex_bg is not initialized so it is always 1.
Use a new helper function, ext4_num_base_meta_blocks() which does not
depend on sbi->s_log_groups_per_flex being initialized.

[ Squashed two patches in the Link URL's below together into a single
commit, which is simpler to review/understand. Also fix checkpatch
warnings. --TYT ]

Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Wang Jianjian <wangjianjian0@foxmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/tencent_21AF0D446A9916ED5C51492CC6C9A0A77B05@qq.com
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/tencent_D744D1450CC169AEA77FCF0A64719909ED05@qq.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

show more ...

ext4: add ext4_sb_block_valid() refactored out of ext4_inode_block_valid()

This API will be needed at places where we don't have an inode
for e.g. while freeing blocks in ext4_group_add_blocks()

Su

ext4: add ext4_sb_block_valid() refactored out of ext4_inode_block_valid()

This API will be needed at places where we don't have an inode
for e.g. while freeing blocks in ext4_group_add_blocks()

Suggested-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/dd34a236543ad5ae7123eeebe0cb69e6bdd44f34.1644992610.git.riteshh@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

show more ...

ext4: standardize error message in ext4_protect_reserved_inode()

We use __ext4_error() when ext4_protect_reserved_inode() finds
filesystem corruption. However EXT4_ERROR_INODE_ERR() is perfectly
cap

ext4: standardize error message in ext4_protect_reserved_inode()

We use __ext4_error() when ext4_protect_reserved_inode() finds
filesystem corruption. However EXT4_ERROR_INODE_ERR() is perfectly
capable of reporting all the needed information. So just use that.

Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201127113405.26867-4-jack@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

show more ...

ext4: update ext4_data_block_valid related comments

Since ext4_data_block_valid() has been renamed to ext4_inode_block_valid(),
the related comments need to be updated.

Signed-off-by: Chunguang Xu

ext4: update ext4_data_block_valid related comments

Since ext4_data_block_valid() has been renamed to ext4_inode_block_valid(),
the related comments need to be updated.

Signed-off-by: Chunguang Xu <brookxu@tencent.com>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1604764698-4269-5-git-send-email-brookxu@tencent.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

show more ...

ext4: rename system_blks to s_system_blks inside ext4_sb_info

Rename system_blks to s_system_blks inside ext4_sb_info, keep
the naming rules consistent with other variables, which is
convenient for

ext4: rename system_blks to s_system_blks inside ext4_sb_info

Rename system_blks to s_system_blks inside ext4_sb_info, keep
the naming rules consistent with other variables, which is
convenient for code reading and writing.

Signed-off-by: Chunguang Xu <brookxu@tencent.com>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca>
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1600916623-544-2-git-send-email-brookxu@tencent.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

show more ...

ext4: correctly restore system zone info when remount fails

When remounting filesystem fails late during remount handling and
block_validity mount option is also changed during the remount, we fail

ext4: correctly restore system zone info when remount fails

When remounting filesystem fails late during remount handling and
block_validity mount option is also changed during the remount, we fail
to restore system zone information to a state matching the mount option.
This is mostly harmless, just the block validity checking will not match
the situation described by the mount option. Make sure these two are always
consistent.

Reported-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200728130437.7804-7-jack@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

show more ...

ext4: handle add_system_zone() failure in ext4_setup_system_zone()

There's one place that fails to handle error from add_system_zone() call
and thus we can fail to protect superblock and group-descr

ext4: handle add_system_zone() failure in ext4_setup_system_zone()

There's one place that fails to handle error from add_system_zone() call
and thus we can fail to protect superblock and group-descriptor blocks
properly in case of ENOMEM. Fix it.

Reported-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200728130437.7804-6-jack@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

show more ...

ext4: fold ext4_data_block_valid_rcu() into the caller

After the previous patch, ext4_data_block_valid_rcu() has a single
caller. Fold it into it.

Reviewed-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
S

ext4: fold ext4_data_block_valid_rcu() into the caller

After the previous patch, ext4_data_block_valid_rcu() has a single
caller. Fold it into it.

Reviewed-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200728130437.7804-5-jack@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

show more ...

ext4: check journal inode extents more carefully

Currently, system zones just track ranges of block, that are "important"
fs metadata (bitmaps, group descriptors, journal blocks, etc.). This
however

ext4: check journal inode extents more carefully

Currently, system zones just track ranges of block, that are "important"
fs metadata (bitmaps, group descriptors, journal blocks, etc.). This
however complicates how extent tree (or indirect blocks) can be checked
for inodes that actually track such metadata - currently the journal
inode but arguably we should be treating quota files or resize inode
similarly. We cannot run __ext4_ext_check() on such metadata inodes when
loading their extents as that would immediately trigger the validity
checks and so we just hack around that and special-case the journal
inode. This however leads to a situation that a journal inode which has
extent tree of depth at least one can have invalid extent tree that gets
unnoticed until ext4_cache_extents() crashes.

To overcome this limitation, track inode number each system zone belongs
to (0 is used for zones not belonging to any inode). We can then verify
inode number matches the expected one when verifying extent tree and
thus avoid the false errors. With this there's no need to to
special-case journal inode during extent tree checking anymore so remove
it.

Fixes: 0a944e8a6c66 ("ext4: don't perform block validity checks on the journal inode")
Reported-by: Wolfgang Frisch <wolfgang.frisch@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200728130437.7804-4-jack@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

show more ...

ext4: don't allow overlapping system zones

Currently, add_system_zone() just silently merges two added system zones
that overlap. However the overlap should not happen and it generally
suggests that

ext4: don't allow overlapping system zones

Currently, add_system_zone() just silently merges two added system zones
that overlap. However the overlap should not happen and it generally
suggests that some unrelated metadata overlap which indicates the fs is
corrupted. We should have caught such problems earlier (e.g. in
ext4_check_descriptors()) but add this check as another line of defense.
In later patch we also use this for stricter checking of journal inode
extent tree.

Reviewed-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200728130437.7804-3-jack@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

show more ...

ext4: save all error info in save_error_info() and drop ext4_set_errno()

Using a separate function, ext4_set_errno() to set the errno is
problematic because it doesn't do the right thing once
s_last

ext4: save all error info in save_error_info() and drop ext4_set_errno()

Using a separate function, ext4_set_errno() to set the errno is
problematic because it doesn't do the right thing once
s_last_error_errorcode is non-zero. It's also less racy to set all of
the error information all at once. (Also, as a bonus, it shrinks code
size slightly.)

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200329020404.686965-1-tytso@mit.edu
Fixes: 878520ac45f9 ("ext4: save the error code which triggered...")
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

show more ...

ext4: add cond_resched() to ext4_protect_reserved_inode

When journal size is set too big by "mkfs.ext4 -J size=", or when
we mount a crafted image to make journal inode->i_size too big,
the loop, "w

ext4: add cond_resched() to ext4_protect_reserved_inode

When journal size is set too big by "mkfs.ext4 -J size=", or when
we mount a crafted image to make journal inode->i_size too big,
the loop, "while (i < num)", holds cpu too long. This could cause
soft lockup.

[ 529.357541] Call trace:
[ 529.357551] dump_backtrace+0x0/0x198
[ 529.357555] show_stack+0x24/0x30
[ 529.357562] dump_stack+0xa4/0xcc
[ 529.357568] watchdog_timer_fn+0x300/0x3e8
[ 529.357574] __hrtimer_run_queues+0x114/0x358
[ 529.357576] hrtimer_interrupt+0x104/0x2d8
[ 529.357580] arch_timer_handler_virt+0x38/0x58
[ 529.357584] handle_percpu_devid_irq+0x90/0x248
[ 529.357588] generic_handle_irq+0x34/0x50
[ 529.357590] __handle_domain_irq+0x68/0xc0
[ 529.357593] gic_handle_irq+0x6c/0x150
[ 529.357595] el1_irq+0xb8/0x140
[ 529.357599] __ll_sc_atomic_add_return_acquire+0x14/0x20
[ 529.357668] ext4_map_blocks+0x64/0x5c0 [ext4]
[ 529.357693] ext4_setup_system_zone+0x330/0x458 [ext4]
[ 529.357717] ext4_fill_super+0x2170/0x2ba8 [ext4]
[ 529.357722] mount_bdev+0x1a8/0x1e8
[ 529.357746] ext4_mount+0x44/0x58 [ext4]
[ 529.357748] mount_fs+0x50/0x170
[ 529.357752] vfs_kern_mount.part.9+0x54/0x188
[ 529.357755] do_mount+0x5ac/0xd78
[ 529.357758] ksys_mount+0x9c/0x118
[ 529.357760] __arm64_sys_mount+0x28/0x38
[ 529.357764] el0_svc_common+0x78/0x130
[ 529.357766] el0_svc_handler+0x38/0x78
[ 529.357769] el0_svc+0x8/0xc
[ 541.356516] watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 23s! [mount:18674]

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200211011752.29242-1-luoshijie1@huawei.com
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Shijie Luo <luoshijie1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@kernel.org

show more ...

ext4: use RCU API in debug_print_tree

struct ext4_sb_info.system_blks was marked __rcu.
But access the pointer without using RCU lock and dereference.
Sparse warning with __rcu notation:

block_vali

ext4: use RCU API in debug_print_tree

struct ext4_sb_info.system_blks was marked __rcu.
But access the pointer without using RCU lock and dereference.
Sparse warning with __rcu notation:

block_validity.c:139:29: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces)
block_validity.c:139:29: expected struct rb_root const *
block_validity.c:139:29: got struct rb_root [noderef] <asn:4> *

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191213153306.30744-1-tranmanphong@gmail.com
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Phong Tran <tranmanphong@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

show more ...

ext4: fix potential use after free after remounting with noblock_validity

Remount process will release system zone which was allocated before if
"noblock_validity" is specified. If we mount an ext4

ext4: fix potential use after free after remounting with noblock_validity

Remount process will release system zone which was allocated before if
"noblock_validity" is specified. If we mount an ext4 file system to two
mountpoints with default mount options, and then remount one of them
with "noblock_validity", it may trigger a use after free problem when
someone accessing the other one.

# mount /dev/sda foo
# mount /dev/sda bar

User access mountpoint "foo" | Remount mountpoint "bar"
|
ext4_map_blocks() | ext4_remount()
check_block_validity() | ext4_setup_system_zone()
ext4_data_block_valid() | ext4_release_system_zone()
| free system_blks rb nodes
access system_blks rb nodes |
trigger use after free |

This problem can also be reproduced by one mountpint, At the same time,
add_system_zone() can get called during remount as well so there can be
racing ext4_data_block_valid() reading the rbtree at the same time.

This patch add RCU to protect system zone from releasing or building
when doing a remount which inverse current "noblock_validity" mount
option. It assign the rbtree after the whole tree was complete and
do actual freeing after rcu grace period, avoid any intermediate state.

Reported-by: syzbot+1e470567330b7ad711d5@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: zhangyi (F) <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>

show more ...

ext4: fix block validity checks for journal inodes using indirect blocks

Commit 345c0dbf3a30 ("ext4: protect journal inode's blocks using
block_validity") failed to add an exception for the journal

ext4: fix block validity checks for journal inodes using indirect blocks

Commit 345c0dbf3a30 ("ext4: protect journal inode's blocks using
block_validity") failed to add an exception for the journal inode in
ext4_check_blockref(), which is the function used by ext4_get_branch()
for indirect blocks. This caused attempts to read from the ext3-style
journals to fail with:

[ 848.968550] EXT4-fs error (device sdb7): ext4_get_branch:171: inode #8: block 30343695: comm jbd2/sdb7-8: invalid block

Fix this by adding the missing exception check.

Fixes: 345c0dbf3a30 ("ext4: protect journal inode's blocks using block_validity")
Reported-by: Arthur Marsh <arthur.marsh@internode.on.net>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

show more ...

ext4: unsigned int compared against zero

There are two cases where u32 variables n and err are being checked
for less than zero error values, the checks is always false because
the variables are not

ext4: unsigned int compared against zero

There are two cases where u32 variables n and err are being checked
for less than zero error values, the checks is always false because
the variables are not signed. Fix this by making the variables ints.

Addresses-Coverity: ("Unsigned compared against 0")
Fixes: 345c0dbf3a30 ("ext4: protect journal inode's blocks using block_validity")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

show more ...

ext4: cond_resched in work-heavy group loops

Signed-off-by: Khazhismel Kumykov <khazhy@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca>

ext4: protect journal inode's blocks using block_validity

Add the blocks which belong to the journal inode to block_validity's
system zone so attempts to deallocate or overwrite the journal due a
co

ext4: protect journal inode's blocks using block_validity

Add the blocks which belong to the journal inode to block_validity's
system zone so attempts to deallocate or overwrite the journal due a
corrupted file system where the journal blocks are also claimed by
another inode.

Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=202879
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@kernel.org

show more ...

ext4: use 'sbi' instead of 'EXT4_SB(sb)'

We could use 'sbi' instead of 'EXT4_SB(sb)' to make code more elegant.

Signed-off-by: Jun Piao <piaojun@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.

ext4: use 'sbi' instead of 'EXT4_SB(sb)'

We could use 'sbi' instead of 'EXT4_SB(sb)' to make code more elegant.

Signed-off-by: Jun Piao <piaojun@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>

show more ...

License cleanup: add SPDX GPL-2.0 license identifier to files with no license

Many source files in the tree are missing licensing information, which
makes it harder for compliance tools to determine

License cleanup: add SPDX GPL-2.0 license identifier to files with no license

Many source files in the tree are missing licensing information, which
makes it harder for compliance tools to determine the correct license.

By default all files without license information are under the default
license of the kernel, which is GPL version 2.

Update the files which contain no license information with the 'GPL-2.0'
SPDX license identifier. The SPDX identifier is a legally binding
shorthand, which can be used instead of the full boiler plate text.

This patch is based on work done by Thomas Gleixner and Kate Stewart and
Philippe Ombredanne.

How this work was done:

Patches were generated and checked against linux-4.14-rc6 for a subset of
the use cases:
- file had no licensing information it it.
- file was a */uapi/* one with no licensing information in it,
- file was a */uapi/* one with existing licensing information,

Further patches will be generated in subsequent months to fix up cases
where non-standard license headers were used, and references to license
had to be inferred by heuristics based on keywords.

The analysis to determine which SPDX License Identifier to be applied to
a file was done in a spreadsheet of side by side results from of the
output of two independent scanners (ScanCode & Windriver) producing SPDX
tag:value files created by Philippe Ombredanne. Philippe prepared the
base worksheet, and did an initial spot review of a few 1000 files.

The 4.13 kernel was the starting point of the analysis with 60,537 files
assessed. Kate Stewart did a file by file comparison of the scanner
results in the spreadsheet to determine which SPDX license identifier(s)
to be applied to the file. She confirmed any determination that was not
immediately clear with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.

Criteria used to select files for SPDX license identifier tagging was:
- Files considered eligible had to be source code files.
- Make and config files were included as candidates if they contained >5
lines of source
- File already had some variant of a license header in it (even if <5
lines).

All documentation files were explicitly excluded.

The following heuristics were used to determine which SPDX license
identifiers to apply.

- when both scanners couldn't find any license traces, file was
considered to have no license information in it, and the top level
COPYING file license applied.

For non */uapi/* files that summary was:

SPDX license identifier # files
---------------------------------------------------|-------
GPL-2.0 11139

and resulted in the first patch in this series.

If that file was a */uapi/* path one, it was "GPL-2.0 WITH
Linux-syscall-note" otherwise it was "GPL-2.0". Results of that was:

SPDX license identifier # files
---------------------------------------------------|-------
GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 930

and resulted in the second patch in this series.

- if a file had some form of licensing information in it, and was one
of the */uapi/* ones, it was denoted with the Linux-syscall-note if
any GPL family license was found in the file or had no licensing in
it (per prior point). Results summary:

SPDX license identifier # files
---------------------------------------------------|------
GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 270
GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 169
((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-2-Clause) 21
((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 17
LGPL-2.1+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 15
GPL-1.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 14
((GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 5
LGPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 4
LGPL-2.1 WITH Linux-syscall-note 3
((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR MIT) 3
((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) AND MIT) 1

and that resulted in the third patch in this series.

- when the two scanners agreed on the detected license(s), that became
the concluded license(s).

- when there was disagreement between the two scanners (one detected a
license but the other didn't, or they both detected different
licenses) a manual inspection of the file occurred.

- In most cases a manual inspection of the information in the file
resulted in a clear resolution of the license that should apply (and
which scanner probably needed to revisit its heuristics).

- When it was not immediately clear, the license identifier was
confirmed with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.

- If there was any question as to the appropriate license identifier,
the file was flagged for further research and to be revisited later
in time.

In total, over 70 hours of logged manual review was done on the
spreadsheet to determine the SPDX license identifiers to apply to the
source files by Kate, Philippe, Thomas and, in some cases, confirmation
by lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.

Kate also obtained a third independent scan of the 4.13 code base from
FOSSology, and compared selected files where the other two scanners
disagreed against that SPDX file, to see if there was new insights. The
Windriver scanner is based on an older version of FOSSology in part, so
they are related.

Thomas did random spot checks in about 500 files from the spreadsheets
for the uapi headers and agreed with SPDX license identifier in the
files he inspected. For the non-uapi files Thomas did random spot checks
in about 15000 files.

In initial set of patches against 4.14-rc6, 3 files were found to have
copy/paste license identifier errors, and have been fixed to reflect the
correct identifier.

Additionally Philippe spent 10 hours this week doing a detailed manual
inspection and review of the 12,461 patched files from the initial patch
version early this week with:
- a full scancode scan run, collecting the matched texts, detected
license ids and scores
- reviewing anything where there was a license detected (about 500+
files) to ensure that the applied SPDX license was correct
- reviewing anything where there was no detection but the patch license
was not GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note to ensure that the applied
SPDX license was correct

This produced a worksheet with 20 files needing minor correction. This
worksheet was then exported into 3 different .csv files for the
different types of files to be modified.

These .csv files were then reviewed by Greg. Thomas wrote a script to
parse the csv files and add the proper SPDX tag to the file, in the
format that the file expected. This script was further refined by Greg
based on the output to detect more types of files automatically and to
distinguish between header and source .c files (which need different
comment types.) Finally Greg ran the script using the .csv files to
generate the patches.

Reviewed-by: Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

show more ...

ext4: add missing KERN_CONT to a few more debugging uses

Recent commits require line continuing printks to always use
pr_cont or KERN_CONT. Add these markings to a few more printks.

Miscellaneaous

ext4: add missing KERN_CONT to a few more debugging uses

Recent commits require line continuing printks to always use
pr_cont or KERN_CONT. Add these markings to a few more printks.

Miscellaneaous:

o Integrate the ea_idebug and ea_bdebug macros to use a single
call to printk(KERN_DEBUG instead of 3 separate printks
o Use the more common varargs macro style

Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca>

show more ...

ext4: call out CRC and corruption errors with specific error codes

Instead of overloading EIO for CRC errors and corrupt structures,
return the same error codes that XFS returns for the same issues.

ext4: call out CRC and corruption errors with specific error codes

Instead of overloading EIO for CRC errors and corrupt structures,
return the same error codes that XFS returns for the same issues.

Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

show more ...

ext4: remove unused header files

Remove unused header files and header files which are included in
ext4.h.

Signed-off-by: Sheng Yong <shengyong1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.

ext4: remove unused header files

Remove unused header files and header files which are included in
ext4.h.

Signed-off-by: Sheng Yong <shengyong1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

show more ...

fs/ext4: use rbtree postorder iteration helper instead of opencoding

Use rbtree_postorder_for_each_entry_safe() to destroy the rbtree instead
of opencoding an alternate postorder iteration that modi

fs/ext4: use rbtree postorder iteration helper instead of opencoding

Use rbtree_postorder_for_each_entry_safe() to destroy the rbtree instead
of opencoding an alternate postorder iteration that modifies the tree

Signed-off-by: Cody P Schafer <cody@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>
Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

show more ...

ext2/3/4: delete unneeded includes of module.h

Delete any instances of include module.h that were not strictly
required. In the case of ext2, the declaration of MODULE_LICENSE
etc. were in inode.c

ext2/3/4: delete unneeded includes of module.h

Delete any instances of include module.h that were not strictly
required. In the case of ext2, the declaration of MODULE_LICENSE
etc. were in inode.c but the module_init/exit were in super.c, so
relocate the MODULE_LICENCE/AUTHOR block to super.c which makes it
consistent with ext3 and ext4 at the same time.

Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>

show more ...