History log of /openbmc/linux/fs/btrfs/volumes.c (Results 151 – 175 of 3035)
Revision (<<< Hide revision tags) (Show revision tags >>>) Date Author Comments
# d7b9416f 26-May-2022 Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

btrfs: remove btrfs_end_io_wq

All reads bio that go through btrfs_map_bio need to be completed in
user context. And read I/Os are the most common and timing critical
in almost any file system workl

btrfs: remove btrfs_end_io_wq

All reads bio that go through btrfs_map_bio need to be completed in
user context. And read I/Os are the most common and timing critical
in almost any file system workloads.

Embed a work_struct into struct btrfs_bio and use it to complete all
read bios submitted through btrfs_map, using the REQ_META flag to decide
which workqueue they are placed on.

This removes the need for a separate 128 byte allocation (typically
rounded up to 192 bytes by slab) for all reads with a size increase
of 24 bytes for struct btrfs_bio. Future patches will reorganize
struct btrfs_bio to make use of this extra space for writes as well.

(All sizes are based a on typical 64-bit non-debug build)

Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...


# b4c46bde 26-May-2022 Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

btrfs: move more work into btrfs_end_bioc

Assign ->mirror_num and ->bi_status in btrfs_end_bioc instead of
duplicating the logic in the callers. Also remove the bio argument as
it always must be bi

btrfs: move more work into btrfs_end_bioc

Assign ->mirror_num and ->bi_status in btrfs_end_bioc instead of
duplicating the logic in the callers. Also remove the bio argument as
it always must be bioc->orig_bio and the now pointless bioc_error that
did nothing but assign bi_sector to the same value just sampled in the
caller.

Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...


Revision tags: v5.15.39, v5.15.38, v5.15.37, v5.15.36, v5.15.35, v5.15.34, v5.15.33, v5.15.32, v5.15.31, v5.17, v5.15.30, v5.15.29, v5.15.28, v5.15.27, v5.15.26, v5.15.25, v5.15.24, v5.15.23
# f6fca391 08-Feb-2022 Stefan Roesch <shr@fb.com>

btrfs: store chunk size in space-info struct

The chunk size is stored in the btrfs_space_info structure. It is
initialized at the start and is then used.

A new API is added to update the current c

btrfs: store chunk size in space-info struct

The chunk size is stored in the btrfs_space_info structure. It is
initialized at the start and is then used.

A new API is added to update the current chunk size. This API is used
to be able to expose the chunk_size as a sysfs setting.

Signed-off-by: Stefan Roesch <shr@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[ rename and merge helpers, switch atomic type to u64, style fixes ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...


# b036f479 22-May-2022 Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>

btrfs: quit early if the fs has no RAID56 support for raid56 related checks

The following functions do special handling for RAID56 chunks:

- btrfs_is_parity_mirror()
Check if the range is in RAID

btrfs: quit early if the fs has no RAID56 support for raid56 related checks

The following functions do special handling for RAID56 chunks:

- btrfs_is_parity_mirror()
Check if the range is in RAID56 chunks.

- btrfs_full_stripe_len()
Either return sectorsize for non-RAID56 profiles or full stripe length
for RAID56 chunks.

But if a filesystem without any RAID56 chunks, it will not have RAID56
incompat flags, and we can skip the chunk tree looking up completely.

Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...


# 719fae89 20-Apr-2022 Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>

btrfs: use ilog2() to replace if () branches for btrfs_bg_flags_to_raid_index()

In function btrfs_bg_flags_to_raid_index(), we use quite some if () to
convert the BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_* bits to a index

btrfs: use ilog2() to replace if () branches for btrfs_bg_flags_to_raid_index()

In function btrfs_bg_flags_to_raid_index(), we use quite some if () to
convert the BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_* bits to a index number.

But the truth is, there is really no such need for so many branches at
all.
Since all BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_* flags are just one single bit set inside
BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_PROFILES_MASK, we can easily use ilog2() to calculate
their values.

This calculation has an anchor point, the lowest PROFILE bit, which is
RAID0.

Even it's fixed on-disk format and should never change, here I added
extra compile time checks to make it super safe:

1. Make sure RAID0 is always the lowest bit in PROFILE_MASK
This is done by finding the first (least significant) bit set of
RAID0 and PROFILE_MASK & ~RAID0.

2. Make sure RAID0 bit set beyond the highest bit of TYPE_MASK

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...


# a7b8e39c 01-Apr-2022 Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>

btrfs: raid56: enable subpage support for RAID56

Now the btrfs RAID56 infrastructure has migrated to use sector_ptr
interface, it should be safe to enable subpage support for RAID56.

Signed-off-by:

btrfs: raid56: enable subpage support for RAID56

Now the btrfs RAID56 infrastructure has migrated to use sector_ptr
interface, it should be safe to enable subpage support for RAID56.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...


# cc353a8b 12-Apr-2022 Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>

btrfs: reduce width for stripe_len from u64 to u32

Currently btrfs uses fixed stripe length (64K), thus u32 is wide enough
for the usage.

Furthermore, even in the future we choose to enlarge stripe

btrfs: reduce width for stripe_len from u64 to u32

Currently btrfs uses fixed stripe length (64K), thus u32 is wide enough
for the usage.

Furthermore, even in the future we choose to enlarge stripe length to
larger values, I don't believe we would want stripe as large as 4G or
larger.

So this patch will reduce the width for all in-memory structures and
parameters, this involves:

- RAID56 related function argument lists
This allows us to do direct division related to stripe_len.
Although we will use bits shift to replace the division anyway.

- btrfs_io_geometry structure
This involves one change to simplify the calculation of both @stripe_nr
and @stripe_offset, using div64_u64_rem().
And add extra sanity check to make sure @stripe_offset is always small
enough for u32.

This saves 8 bytes for the structure.

- map_lookup structure
This convert @stripe_len to u32, which saves 8 bytes. (saved 4 bytes,
and removed a 4-bytes hole)

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...


# d201238c 28-Feb-2022 Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>

btrfs: repair super block num_devices automatically

[BUG]
There is a report that a btrfs has a bad super block num devices.

This makes btrfs to reject the fs completely.

BTRFS error (device sdd3

btrfs: repair super block num_devices automatically

[BUG]
There is a report that a btrfs has a bad super block num devices.

This makes btrfs to reject the fs completely.

BTRFS error (device sdd3): super_num_devices 3 mismatch with num_devices 2 found here
BTRFS error (device sdd3): failed to read chunk tree: -22
BTRFS error (device sdd3): open_ctree failed

[CAUSE]
During btrfs device removal, chunk tree and super block num devs are
updated in two different transactions:

btrfs_rm_device()
|- btrfs_rm_dev_item(device)
| |- trans = btrfs_start_transaction()
| | Now we got transaction X
| |
| |- btrfs_del_item()
| | Now device item is removed from chunk tree
| |
| |- btrfs_commit_transaction()
| Transaction X got committed, super num devs untouched,
| but device item removed from chunk tree.
| (AKA, super num devs is already incorrect)
|
|- cur_devices->num_devices--;
|- cur_devices->total_devices--;
|- btrfs_set_super_num_devices()
All those operations are not in transaction X, thus it will
only be written back to disk in next transaction.

So after the transaction X in btrfs_rm_dev_item() committed, but before
transaction X+1 (which can be minutes away), a power loss happen, then
we got the super num mismatch.

This has been fixed by commit bbac58698a55 ("btrfs: remove device item
and update super block in the same transaction").

[FIX]
Make the super_num_devices check less strict, converting it from a hard
error to a warning, and reset the value to a correct one for the current
or next transaction commit.

As the number of device items is the critical information where the
super block num_devices is only a cached value (and also useful for
cross checking), it's safe to automatically update it. Other device
related problems like missing device are handled after that and may
require other means to resolve, like degraded mount. With this fix,
potentially affected filesystems won't fail mount and require the manual
repair by btrfs check.

Reported-by: Luca Béla Palkovics <luca.bela.palkovics@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CA+8xDSpvdm_U0QLBAnrH=zqDq_cWCOH5TiV46CKmp3igr44okQ@mail.gmail.com/
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...


# 110ac0e5 03-Apr-2022 Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

btrfs: pass a block_device to btrfs_bio_clone

Pass the block_device to bio_alloc_clone instead of setting it later.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@

btrfs: pass a block_device to btrfs_bio_clone

Pass the block_device to bio_alloc_clone instead of setting it later.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...


# fce3f24a 03-Apr-2022 Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

btrfs: move the call to bio_set_dev out of submit_stripe_bio

Prepare for additional refactoring, btrfs_map_bio is direct caller of
submit_stripe_bio.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
R

btrfs: move the call to bio_set_dev out of submit_stripe_bio

Prepare for additional refactoring, btrfs_map_bio is direct caller of
submit_stripe_bio.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...


# 58ff51f1 03-Apr-2022 Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

btrfs: check-integrity: split submit_bio from btrfsic checking

Require a separate call to the integrity checking helpers from the
actual bio submission.

Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed

btrfs: check-integrity: split submit_bio from btrfsic checking

Require a separate call to the integrity checking helpers from the
actual bio submission.

Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...


# 0d031dc4 31-Mar-2022 Yu Zhe <yuzhe@nfschina.com>

btrfs: remove unnecessary type casts

Explicit type casts are not necessary when it's void* to another pointer
type.

Signed-off-by: Yu Zhe <yuzhe@nfschina.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@sus

btrfs: remove unnecessary type casts

Explicit type casts are not necessary when it's void* to another pointer
type.

Signed-off-by: Yu Zhe <yuzhe@nfschina.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...


Revision tags: v5.15.22, v5.15.21, v5.15.20, v5.15.19, v5.15.18, v5.15.17, v5.4.173, v5.15.16, v5.15.15
# e959d3c1 12-Jan-2022 Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>

btrfs: use dummy extent buffer for super block sys chunk array read

In function btrfs_read_sys_array(), we allocate a real extent buffer
using btrfs_find_create_tree_block().

Such extent buffer wil

btrfs: use dummy extent buffer for super block sys chunk array read

In function btrfs_read_sys_array(), we allocate a real extent buffer
using btrfs_find_create_tree_block().

Such extent buffer will be even cached into buffer_radix tree, and using
btree inode address space.

However we only use such extent buffer to enable the accessors, thus we
don't even need to bother using real extent buffer, a dummy one is
what we really need.

And for dummy extent buffer, we no longer need to do any special
handling for the first page, as subpage helper is already doing it
properly.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...


# 43cb1478 09-Mar-2022 Gabriel Niebler <gniebler@suse.com>

btrfs: use btrfs_for_each_slot in btrfs_read_chunk_tree

This function can be simplified by refactoring to use the new iterator
macro. No functional changes.

Signed-off-by: Marcos Paulo de Souza <m

btrfs: use btrfs_for_each_slot in btrfs_read_chunk_tree

This function can be simplified by refactoring to use the new iterator
macro. No functional changes.

Signed-off-by: Marcos Paulo de Souza <mpdesouza@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Gabriel Niebler <gniebler@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...


# 10f0d2a5 14-Apr-2022 Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

block: add a bdev_nonrot helper

Add a helper to check the nonrot flag based on the block_device instead
of having to poke into the block layer internal request_queue.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellw

block: add a bdev_nonrot helper

Add a helper to check the nonrot flag based on the block_device instead
of having to poke into the block layer internal request_queue.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Acked-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> [btrfs]
Reviewed-by: Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@nvidia.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220415045258.199825-12-hch@lst.de
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

show more ...


# f9e69aa9 06-Apr-2022 Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

btrfs: simplify ->flush_bio handling

Use and embedded bios that is initialized when used instead of
bio_kmalloc plus bio_reset.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: David Ster

btrfs: simplify ->flush_bio handling

Use and embedded bios that is initialized when used instead of
bio_kmalloc plus bio_reset.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@nvidia.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220406061228.410163-2-hch@lst.de
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

show more ...


# a690e5f2 29-Mar-2022 Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>

btrfs: mark resumed async balance as writing

When btrfs balance is interrupted with umount, the background balance
resumes on the next mount. There is a potential deadlock with FS freezing
here like

btrfs: mark resumed async balance as writing

When btrfs balance is interrupted with umount, the background balance
resumes on the next mount. There is a potential deadlock with FS freezing
here like as described in commit 26559780b953 ("btrfs: zoned: mark
relocation as writing"). Mark the process as sb_writing to avoid it.

Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.9+
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...


# bbac5869 07-Mar-2022 Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>

btrfs: remove device item and update super block in the same transaction

[BUG]
There is a report that a btrfs has a bad super block num devices.

This makes btrfs to reject the fs completely.

BTR

btrfs: remove device item and update super block in the same transaction

[BUG]
There is a report that a btrfs has a bad super block num devices.

This makes btrfs to reject the fs completely.

BTRFS error (device sdd3): super_num_devices 3 mismatch with num_devices 2 found here
BTRFS error (device sdd3): failed to read chunk tree: -22
BTRFS error (device sdd3): open_ctree failed

[CAUSE]
During btrfs device removal, chunk tree and super block num devs are
updated in two different transactions:

btrfs_rm_device()
|- btrfs_rm_dev_item(device)
| |- trans = btrfs_start_transaction()
| | Now we got transaction X
| |
| |- btrfs_del_item()
| | Now device item is removed from chunk tree
| |
| |- btrfs_commit_transaction()
| Transaction X got committed, super num devs untouched,
| but device item removed from chunk tree.
| (AKA, super num devs is already incorrect)
|
|- cur_devices->num_devices--;
|- cur_devices->total_devices--;
|- btrfs_set_super_num_devices()
All those operations are not in transaction X, thus it will
only be written back to disk in next transaction.

So after the transaction X in btrfs_rm_dev_item() committed, but before
transaction X+1 (which can be minutes away), a power loss happen, then
we got the super num mismatch.

[FIX]
Instead of starting and committing a transaction inside
btrfs_rm_dev_item(), start a transaction in side btrfs_rm_device() and
pass it to btrfs_rm_dev_item().

And only commit the transaction after everything is done.

Reported-by: Luca Béla Palkovics <luca.bela.palkovics@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CA+8xDSpvdm_U0QLBAnrH=zqDq_cWCOH5TiV46CKmp3igr44okQ@mail.gmail.com/
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...


# 79c9234b 03-Mar-2022 Dongliang Mu <mudongliangabcd@gmail.com>

btrfs: don't access possibly stale fs_info data in device_list_add

Syzbot reported a possible use-after-free in printing information
in device_list_add.

Very similar with the bug fixed by commit 06

btrfs: don't access possibly stale fs_info data in device_list_add

Syzbot reported a possible use-after-free in printing information
in device_list_add.

Very similar with the bug fixed by commit 0697d9a61099 ("btrfs: don't
access possibly stale fs_info data for printing duplicate device"),
but this time the use occurs in btrfs_info_in_rcu.

Call Trace:
kasan_report.cold+0x83/0xdf mm/kasan/report.c:459
btrfs_printk+0x395/0x425 fs/btrfs/super.c:244
device_list_add.cold+0xd7/0x2ed fs/btrfs/volumes.c:957
btrfs_scan_one_device+0x4c7/0x5c0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1387
btrfs_control_ioctl+0x12a/0x2d0 fs/btrfs/super.c:2409
vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]
__do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:874 [inline]
__se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:860 [inline]
__x64_sys_ioctl+0x193/0x200 fs/ioctl.c:860
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae

Fix this by modifying device->fs_info to NULL too.

Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+82650a4e0ed38f218363@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.19+
Signed-off-by: Dongliang Mu <mudongliangabcd@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...


# ca5e4ea0 17-Feb-2022 Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>

btrfs: zoned: mark relocation as writing

There is a hung_task issue with running generic/068 on an SMR
device. The hang occurs while a process is trying to thaw the
filesystem. The process is trying

btrfs: zoned: mark relocation as writing

There is a hung_task issue with running generic/068 on an SMR
device. The hang occurs while a process is trying to thaw the
filesystem. The process is trying to take sb->s_umount to thaw the
FS. The lock is held by fsstress, which calls btrfs_sync_fs() and is
waiting for an ordered extent to finish. However, as the FS is frozen,
the ordered extents never finish.

Having an ordered extent while the FS is frozen is the root cause of
the hang. The ordered extent is initiated from btrfs_relocate_chunk()
which is called from btrfs_reclaim_bgs_work().

This commit adds sb_*_write() around btrfs_relocate_chunk() call
site. For the usual "btrfs balance" command, we already call it with
mnt_want_file() in btrfs_ioctl_balance().

Fixes: 18bb8bbf13c1 ("btrfs: zoned: automatically reclaim zones")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.13+
Link: https://github.com/naota/linux/issues/56
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...


Revision tags: v5.16, v5.15.10, v5.15.9
# 914a519b 15-Dec-2021 Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>

btrfs: disable device manipulation ioctl's EXTENT_TREE_V2

Device add, remove, and replace all require balance, which doesn't work
right now on extent tree v2, so disable these for now.

Signed-off-b

btrfs: disable device manipulation ioctl's EXTENT_TREE_V2

Device add, remove, and replace all require balance, which doesn't work
right now on extent tree v2, so disable these for now.

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...


# 4b349253 15-Dec-2021 Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>

btrfs: disable balance for extent tree v2 for now

With global root id's it makes it problematic to do backref lookups for
balance. This isn't hard to deal with, but future changes are going to
make

btrfs: disable balance for extent tree v2 for now

With global root id's it makes it problematic to do backref lookups for
balance. This isn't hard to deal with, but future changes are going to
make it impossible to lookup backrefs on any COWonly roots, so go ahead
and disable balance for now on extent tree v2 until we can add balance
support back in future patches.

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...


# 823f8e5c 12-Jan-2022 Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>

btrfs: cleanup temporary variables when finding rotational device status

The pointer to struct request_queue is used only to get device type
rotating or the non-rotating. So use it directly.

Signed

btrfs: cleanup temporary variables when finding rotational device status

The pointer to struct request_queue is used only to get device type
rotating or the non-rotating. So use it directly.

Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...


# 330a5bf4 11-Jan-2022 Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>

btrfs: use dev_t to match device in device_matched

Commit "btrfs: add device major-minor info in the struct btrfs_device"
saved the device major-minor number in the struct btrfs_device upon
discover

btrfs: use dev_t to match device in device_matched

Commit "btrfs: add device major-minor info in the struct btrfs_device"
saved the device major-minor number in the struct btrfs_device upon
discovering it.

So no need to lookup_bdev() again just match, which means
device_matched() can go away.

Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...


# 4889bc05 11-Jan-2022 Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>

btrfs: add device major-minor info in the struct btrfs_device

Internally it is common to use the major-minor number to identify a
device and, at a few locations in btrfs, we use the major-minor numb

btrfs: add device major-minor info in the struct btrfs_device

Internally it is common to use the major-minor number to identify a
device and, at a few locations in btrfs, we use the major-minor number
to match the device.

So when we identify a new btrfs device through device add or device
replace or device-scan/ready save the device's major-minor (dev_t) in the
struct btrfs_device so that we don't have to call lookup_bdev() again.

Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...


12345678910>>...122