| #
1b2a7dde |
| 26-Jul-2022 |
Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> |
btrfs: fix lockdep splat with reloc root extent buffers
[ Upstream commit b40130b23ca4a08c5785d5a3559805916bddba3c ]
We have been hitting the following lockdep splat with btrfs/187 recently
WARN
btrfs: fix lockdep splat with reloc root extent buffers
[ Upstream commit b40130b23ca4a08c5785d5a3559805916bddba3c ]
We have been hitting the following lockdep splat with btrfs/187 recently
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
5.19.0-rc8+ #775 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
btrfs/752500 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff97e1875a97b8 (btrfs-treloc-02#2){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_lock+0x24/0x110
but task is already holding lock:
ffff97e1875a9278 (btrfs-tree-01/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_lock+0x24/0x110
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #2 (btrfs-tree-01/1){+.+.}-{3:3}:
down_write_nested+0x41/0x80
__btrfs_tree_lock+0x24/0x110
btrfs_init_new_buffer+0x7d/0x2c0
btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0x120/0x3b0
__btrfs_cow_block+0x136/0x600
btrfs_cow_block+0x10b/0x230
btrfs_search_slot+0x53b/0xb70
btrfs_lookup_inode+0x2a/0xa0
__btrfs_update_delayed_inode+0x5f/0x280
btrfs_async_run_delayed_root+0x24c/0x290
btrfs_work_helper+0xf2/0x3e0
process_one_work+0x271/0x590
worker_thread+0x52/0x3b0
kthread+0xf0/0x120
ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
-> #1 (btrfs-tree-01){++++}-{3:3}:
down_write_nested+0x41/0x80
__btrfs_tree_lock+0x24/0x110
btrfs_search_slot+0x3c3/0xb70
do_relocation+0x10c/0x6b0
relocate_tree_blocks+0x317/0x6d0
relocate_block_group+0x1f1/0x560
btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x23e/0x400
btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x4c/0x140
btrfs_balance+0x755/0xe40
btrfs_ioctl+0x1ea2/0x2c90
__x64_sys_ioctl+0x88/0xc0
do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
-> #0 (btrfs-treloc-02#2){+.+.}-{3:3}:
__lock_acquire+0x1122/0x1e10
lock_acquire+0xc2/0x2d0
down_write_nested+0x41/0x80
__btrfs_tree_lock+0x24/0x110
btrfs_lock_root_node+0x31/0x50
btrfs_search_slot+0x1cb/0xb70
replace_path+0x541/0x9f0
merge_reloc_root+0x1d6/0x610
merge_reloc_roots+0xe2/0x260
relocate_block_group+0x2c8/0x560
btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x23e/0x400
btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x4c/0x140
btrfs_balance+0x755/0xe40
btrfs_ioctl+0x1ea2/0x2c90
__x64_sys_ioctl+0x88/0xc0
do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
other info that might help us debug this:
Chain exists of:
btrfs-treloc-02#2 --> btrfs-tree-01 --> btrfs-tree-01/1
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(btrfs-tree-01/1);
lock(btrfs-tree-01);
lock(btrfs-tree-01/1);
lock(btrfs-treloc-02#2);
*** DEADLOCK ***
7 locks held by btrfs/752500:
#0: ffff97e292fdf460 (sb_writers#12){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: btrfs_ioctl+0x208/0x2c90
#1: ffff97e284c02050 (&fs_info->reclaim_bgs_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_balance+0x55f/0xe40
#2: ffff97e284c00878 (&fs_info->cleaner_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x236/0x400
#3: ffff97e292fdf650 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: merge_reloc_root+0xef/0x610
#4: ffff97e284c02378 (btrfs_trans_num_writers){++++}-{0:0}, at: join_transaction+0x1a8/0x5a0
#5: ffff97e284c023a0 (btrfs_trans_num_extwriters){++++}-{0:0}, at: join_transaction+0x1a8/0x5a0
#6: ffff97e1875a9278 (btrfs-tree-01/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_lock+0x24/0x110
stack backtrace:
CPU: 1 PID: 752500 Comm: btrfs Not tainted 5.19.0-rc8+ #775
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.13.0-2.fc32 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
dump_stack_lvl+0x56/0x73
check_noncircular+0xd6/0x100
? lock_is_held_type+0xe2/0x140
__lock_acquire+0x1122/0x1e10
lock_acquire+0xc2/0x2d0
? __btrfs_tree_lock+0x24/0x110
down_write_nested+0x41/0x80
? __btrfs_tree_lock+0x24/0x110
__btrfs_tree_lock+0x24/0x110
btrfs_lock_root_node+0x31/0x50
btrfs_search_slot+0x1cb/0xb70
? lock_release+0x137/0x2d0
? _raw_spin_unlock+0x29/0x50
? release_extent_buffer+0x128/0x180
replace_path+0x541/0x9f0
merge_reloc_root+0x1d6/0x610
merge_reloc_roots+0xe2/0x260
relocate_block_group+0x2c8/0x560
btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x23e/0x400
btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x4c/0x140
btrfs_balance+0x755/0xe40
btrfs_ioctl+0x1ea2/0x2c90
? lock_is_held_type+0xe2/0x140
? lock_is_held_type+0xe2/0x140
? __x64_sys_ioctl+0x88/0xc0
__x64_sys_ioctl+0x88/0xc0
do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
This isn't necessarily new, it's just tricky to hit in practice. There
are two competing things going on here. With relocation we create a
snapshot of every fs tree with a reloc tree. Any extent buffers that
get initialized here are initialized with the reloc root lockdep key.
However since it is a snapshot, any blocks that are currently in cache
that originally belonged to the fs tree will have the normal tree
lockdep key set. This creates the lock dependency of
reloc tree -> normal tree
for the extent buffer locking during the first phase of the relocation
as we walk down the reloc root to relocate blocks.
However this is problematic because the final phase of the relocation is
merging the reloc root into the original fs root. This involves
searching down to any keys that exist in the original fs root and then
swapping the relocated block and the original fs root block. We have to
search down to the fs root first, and then go search the reloc root for
the block we need to replace. This creates the dependency of
normal tree -> reloc tree
which is why lockdep complains.
Additionally even if we were to fix this particular mismatch with a
different nesting for the merge case, we're still slotting in a block
that has a owner of the reloc root objectid into a normal tree, so that
block will have its lockdep key set to the tree reloc root, and create a
lockdep splat later on when we wander into that block from the fs root.
Unfortunately the only solution here is to make sure we do not set the
lockdep key to the reloc tree lockdep key normally, and then reset any
blocks we wander into from the reloc root when we're doing the merged.
This solves the problem of having mixed tree reloc keys intermixed with
normal tree keys, and then allows us to make sure in the merge case we
maintain the lock order of
normal tree -> reloc tree
We handle this by setting a bit on the reloc root when we do the search
for the block we want to relocate, and any block we search into or COW
at that point gets set to the reloc tree key. This works correctly
because we only ever COW down to the parent node, so we aren't resetting
the key for the block we're linking into the fs root.
With this patch we no longer have the lockdep splat in btrfs/187.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
show more ...
|
| #
78f8c237 |
| 21-Jul-2022 |
Zixuan Fu <r33s3n6@gmail.com> |
btrfs: unset reloc control if transaction commit fails in prepare_to_relocate()
commit 85f02d6c856b9f3a0acf5219de6e32f58b9778eb upstream.
In btrfs_relocate_block_group(), the rc is allocated. Then
btrfs: unset reloc control if transaction commit fails in prepare_to_relocate()
commit 85f02d6c856b9f3a0acf5219de6e32f58b9778eb upstream.
In btrfs_relocate_block_group(), the rc is allocated. Then
btrfs_relocate_block_group() calls
relocate_block_group()
prepare_to_relocate()
set_reloc_control()
that assigns rc to the variable fs_info->reloc_ctl. When
prepare_to_relocate() returns, it calls
btrfs_commit_transaction()
btrfs_start_dirty_block_groups()
btrfs_alloc_path()
kmem_cache_zalloc()
which may fail for example (or other errors could happen). When the
failure occurs, btrfs_relocate_block_group() detects the error and frees
rc and doesn't set fs_info->reloc_ctl to NULL. After that, in
btrfs_init_reloc_root(), rc is retrieved from fs_info->reloc_ctl and
then used, which may cause a use-after-free bug.
This possible bug can be triggered by calling btrfs_ioctl_balance()
before calling btrfs_ioctl_defrag().
To fix this possible bug, in prepare_to_relocate(), check if
btrfs_commit_transaction() fails. If the failure occurs,
unset_reloc_control() is called to set fs_info->reloc_ctl to NULL.
The error log in our fault-injection testing is shown as follows:
[ 58.751070] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in btrfs_init_reloc_root+0x7ca/0x920 [btrfs]
...
[ 58.753577] Call Trace:
...
[ 58.755800] kasan_report+0x45/0x60
[ 58.756066] btrfs_init_reloc_root+0x7ca/0x920 [btrfs]
[ 58.757304] record_root_in_trans+0x792/0xa10 [btrfs]
[ 58.757748] btrfs_record_root_in_trans+0x463/0x4f0 [btrfs]
[ 58.758231] start_transaction+0x896/0x2950 [btrfs]
[ 58.758661] btrfs_defrag_root+0x250/0xc00 [btrfs]
[ 58.759083] btrfs_ioctl_defrag+0x467/0xa00 [btrfs]
[ 58.759513] btrfs_ioctl+0x3c95/0x114e0 [btrfs]
...
[ 58.768510] Allocated by task 23683:
[ 58.768777] ____kasan_kmalloc+0xb5/0xf0
[ 58.769069] __kmalloc+0x227/0x3d0
[ 58.769325] alloc_reloc_control+0x10a/0x3d0 [btrfs]
[ 58.769755] btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x7aa/0x1e20 [btrfs]
[ 58.770228] btrfs_relocate_chunk+0xf1/0x760 [btrfs]
[ 58.770655] __btrfs_balance+0x1326/0x1f10 [btrfs]
[ 58.771071] btrfs_balance+0x3150/0x3d30 [btrfs]
[ 58.771472] btrfs_ioctl_balance+0xd84/0x1410 [btrfs]
[ 58.771902] btrfs_ioctl+0x4caa/0x114e0 [btrfs]
...
[ 58.773337] Freed by task 23683:
...
[ 58.774815] kfree+0xda/0x2b0
[ 58.775038] free_reloc_control+0x1d6/0x220 [btrfs]
[ 58.775465] btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x115c/0x1e20 [btrfs]
[ 58.775944] btrfs_relocate_chunk+0xf1/0x760 [btrfs]
[ 58.776369] __btrfs_balance+0x1326/0x1f10 [btrfs]
[ 58.776784] btrfs_balance+0x3150/0x3d30 [btrfs]
[ 58.777185] btrfs_ioctl_balance+0xd84/0x1410 [btrfs]
[ 58.777621] btrfs_ioctl+0x4caa/0x114e0 [btrfs]
...
Reported-by: TOTE Robot <oslab@tsinghua.edu.cn>
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.15+
Reviewed-by: Sweet Tea Dorminy <sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me>
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Zixuan Fu <r33s3n6@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
show more ...
|
| #
1b2a7dde |
| 26-Jul-2022 |
Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> |
btrfs: fix lockdep splat with reloc root extent buffers
[ Upstream commit b40130b23ca4a08c5785d5a3559805916bddba3c ]
We have been hitting the following lockdep splat with btrfs/187 recently
WARN
btrfs: fix lockdep splat with reloc root extent buffers
[ Upstream commit b40130b23ca4a08c5785d5a3559805916bddba3c ]
We have been hitting the following lockdep splat with btrfs/187 recently
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
5.19.0-rc8+ #775 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
btrfs/752500 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff97e1875a97b8 (btrfs-treloc-02#2){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_lock+0x24/0x110
but task is already holding lock:
ffff97e1875a9278 (btrfs-tree-01/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_lock+0x24/0x110
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #2 (btrfs-tree-01/1){+.+.}-{3:3}:
down_write_nested+0x41/0x80
__btrfs_tree_lock+0x24/0x110
btrfs_init_new_buffer+0x7d/0x2c0
btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0x120/0x3b0
__btrfs_cow_block+0x136/0x600
btrfs_cow_block+0x10b/0x230
btrfs_search_slot+0x53b/0xb70
btrfs_lookup_inode+0x2a/0xa0
__btrfs_update_delayed_inode+0x5f/0x280
btrfs_async_run_delayed_root+0x24c/0x290
btrfs_work_helper+0xf2/0x3e0
process_one_work+0x271/0x590
worker_thread+0x52/0x3b0
kthread+0xf0/0x120
ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
-> #1 (btrfs-tree-01){++++}-{3:3}:
down_write_nested+0x41/0x80
__btrfs_tree_lock+0x24/0x110
btrfs_search_slot+0x3c3/0xb70
do_relocation+0x10c/0x6b0
relocate_tree_blocks+0x317/0x6d0
relocate_block_group+0x1f1/0x560
btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x23e/0x400
btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x4c/0x140
btrfs_balance+0x755/0xe40
btrfs_ioctl+0x1ea2/0x2c90
__x64_sys_ioctl+0x88/0xc0
do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
-> #0 (btrfs-treloc-02#2){+.+.}-{3:3}:
__lock_acquire+0x1122/0x1e10
lock_acquire+0xc2/0x2d0
down_write_nested+0x41/0x80
__btrfs_tree_lock+0x24/0x110
btrfs_lock_root_node+0x31/0x50
btrfs_search_slot+0x1cb/0xb70
replace_path+0x541/0x9f0
merge_reloc_root+0x1d6/0x610
merge_reloc_roots+0xe2/0x260
relocate_block_group+0x2c8/0x560
btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x23e/0x400
btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x4c/0x140
btrfs_balance+0x755/0xe40
btrfs_ioctl+0x1ea2/0x2c90
__x64_sys_ioctl+0x88/0xc0
do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
other info that might help us debug this:
Chain exists of:
btrfs-treloc-02#2 --> btrfs-tree-01 --> btrfs-tree-01/1
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(btrfs-tree-01/1);
lock(btrfs-tree-01);
lock(btrfs-tree-01/1);
lock(btrfs-treloc-02#2);
*** DEADLOCK ***
7 locks held by btrfs/752500:
#0: ffff97e292fdf460 (sb_writers#12){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: btrfs_ioctl+0x208/0x2c90
#1: ffff97e284c02050 (&fs_info->reclaim_bgs_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_balance+0x55f/0xe40
#2: ffff97e284c00878 (&fs_info->cleaner_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x236/0x400
#3: ffff97e292fdf650 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: merge_reloc_root+0xef/0x610
#4: ffff97e284c02378 (btrfs_trans_num_writers){++++}-{0:0}, at: join_transaction+0x1a8/0x5a0
#5: ffff97e284c023a0 (btrfs_trans_num_extwriters){++++}-{0:0}, at: join_transaction+0x1a8/0x5a0
#6: ffff97e1875a9278 (btrfs-tree-01/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_lock+0x24/0x110
stack backtrace:
CPU: 1 PID: 752500 Comm: btrfs Not tainted 5.19.0-rc8+ #775
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.13.0-2.fc32 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
dump_stack_lvl+0x56/0x73
check_noncircular+0xd6/0x100
? lock_is_held_type+0xe2/0x140
__lock_acquire+0x1122/0x1e10
lock_acquire+0xc2/0x2d0
? __btrfs_tree_lock+0x24/0x110
down_write_nested+0x41/0x80
? __btrfs_tree_lock+0x24/0x110
__btrfs_tree_lock+0x24/0x110
btrfs_lock_root_node+0x31/0x50
btrfs_search_slot+0x1cb/0xb70
? lock_release+0x137/0x2d0
? _raw_spin_unlock+0x29/0x50
? release_extent_buffer+0x128/0x180
replace_path+0x541/0x9f0
merge_reloc_root+0x1d6/0x610
merge_reloc_roots+0xe2/0x260
relocate_block_group+0x2c8/0x560
btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x23e/0x400
btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x4c/0x140
btrfs_balance+0x755/0xe40
btrfs_ioctl+0x1ea2/0x2c90
? lock_is_held_type+0xe2/0x140
? lock_is_held_type+0xe2/0x140
? __x64_sys_ioctl+0x88/0xc0
__x64_sys_ioctl+0x88/0xc0
do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
This isn't necessarily new, it's just tricky to hit in practice. There
are two competing things going on here. With relocation we create a
snapshot of every fs tree with a reloc tree. Any extent buffers that
get initialized here are initialized with the reloc root lockdep key.
However since it is a snapshot, any blocks that are currently in cache
that originally belonged to the fs tree will have the normal tree
lockdep key set. This creates the lock dependency of
reloc tree -> normal tree
for the extent buffer locking during the first phase of the relocation
as we walk down the reloc root to relocate blocks.
However this is problematic because the final phase of the relocation is
merging the reloc root into the original fs root. This involves
searching down to any keys that exist in the original fs root and then
swapping the relocated block and the original fs root block. We have to
search down to the fs root first, and then go search the reloc root for
the block we need to replace. This creates the dependency of
normal tree -> reloc tree
which is why lockdep complains.
Additionally even if we were to fix this particular mismatch with a
different nesting for the merge case, we're still slotting in a block
that has a owner of the reloc root objectid into a normal tree, so that
block will have its lockdep key set to the tree reloc root, and create a
lockdep splat later on when we wander into that block from the fs root.
Unfortunately the only solution here is to make sure we do not set the
lockdep key to the reloc tree lockdep key normally, and then reset any
blocks we wander into from the reloc root when we're doing the merged.
This solves the problem of having mixed tree reloc keys intermixed with
normal tree keys, and then allows us to make sure in the merge case we
maintain the lock order of
normal tree -> reloc tree
We handle this by setting a bit on the reloc root when we do the search
for the block we want to relocate, and any block we search into or COW
at that point gets set to the reloc tree key. This works correctly
because we only ever COW down to the parent node, so we aren't resetting
the key for the block we're linking into the fs root.
With this patch we no longer have the lockdep splat in btrfs/187.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
show more ...
|
| #
78f8c237 |
| 21-Jul-2022 |
Zixuan Fu <r33s3n6@gmail.com> |
btrfs: unset reloc control if transaction commit fails in prepare_to_relocate()
commit 85f02d6c856b9f3a0acf5219de6e32f58b9778eb upstream.
In btrfs_relocate_block_group(), the rc is allocated. Then
btrfs: unset reloc control if transaction commit fails in prepare_to_relocate()
commit 85f02d6c856b9f3a0acf5219de6e32f58b9778eb upstream.
In btrfs_relocate_block_group(), the rc is allocated. Then
btrfs_relocate_block_group() calls
relocate_block_group()
prepare_to_relocate()
set_reloc_control()
that assigns rc to the variable fs_info->reloc_ctl. When
prepare_to_relocate() returns, it calls
btrfs_commit_transaction()
btrfs_start_dirty_block_groups()
btrfs_alloc_path()
kmem_cache_zalloc()
which may fail for example (or other errors could happen). When the
failure occurs, btrfs_relocate_block_group() detects the error and frees
rc and doesn't set fs_info->reloc_ctl to NULL. After that, in
btrfs_init_reloc_root(), rc is retrieved from fs_info->reloc_ctl and
then used, which may cause a use-after-free bug.
This possible bug can be triggered by calling btrfs_ioctl_balance()
before calling btrfs_ioctl_defrag().
To fix this possible bug, in prepare_to_relocate(), check if
btrfs_commit_transaction() fails. If the failure occurs,
unset_reloc_control() is called to set fs_info->reloc_ctl to NULL.
The error log in our fault-injection testing is shown as follows:
[ 58.751070] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in btrfs_init_reloc_root+0x7ca/0x920 [btrfs]
...
[ 58.753577] Call Trace:
...
[ 58.755800] kasan_report+0x45/0x60
[ 58.756066] btrfs_init_reloc_root+0x7ca/0x920 [btrfs]
[ 58.757304] record_root_in_trans+0x792/0xa10 [btrfs]
[ 58.757748] btrfs_record_root_in_trans+0x463/0x4f0 [btrfs]
[ 58.758231] start_transaction+0x896/0x2950 [btrfs]
[ 58.758661] btrfs_defrag_root+0x250/0xc00 [btrfs]
[ 58.759083] btrfs_ioctl_defrag+0x467/0xa00 [btrfs]
[ 58.759513] btrfs_ioctl+0x3c95/0x114e0 [btrfs]
...
[ 58.768510] Allocated by task 23683:
[ 58.768777] ____kasan_kmalloc+0xb5/0xf0
[ 58.769069] __kmalloc+0x227/0x3d0
[ 58.769325] alloc_reloc_control+0x10a/0x3d0 [btrfs]
[ 58.769755] btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x7aa/0x1e20 [btrfs]
[ 58.770228] btrfs_relocate_chunk+0xf1/0x760 [btrfs]
[ 58.770655] __btrfs_balance+0x1326/0x1f10 [btrfs]
[ 58.771071] btrfs_balance+0x3150/0x3d30 [btrfs]
[ 58.771472] btrfs_ioctl_balance+0xd84/0x1410 [btrfs]
[ 58.771902] btrfs_ioctl+0x4caa/0x114e0 [btrfs]
...
[ 58.773337] Freed by task 23683:
...
[ 58.774815] kfree+0xda/0x2b0
[ 58.775038] free_reloc_control+0x1d6/0x220 [btrfs]
[ 58.775465] btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x115c/0x1e20 [btrfs]
[ 58.775944] btrfs_relocate_chunk+0xf1/0x760 [btrfs]
[ 58.776369] __btrfs_balance+0x1326/0x1f10 [btrfs]
[ 58.776784] btrfs_balance+0x3150/0x3d30 [btrfs]
[ 58.777185] btrfs_ioctl_balance+0xd84/0x1410 [btrfs]
[ 58.777621] btrfs_ioctl+0x4caa/0x114e0 [btrfs]
...
Reported-by: TOTE Robot <oslab@tsinghua.edu.cn>
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.15+
Reviewed-by: Sweet Tea Dorminy <sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me>
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Zixuan Fu <r33s3n6@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
show more ...
|
| #
1b2a7dde |
| 26-Jul-2022 |
Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> |
btrfs: fix lockdep splat with reloc root extent buffers
[ Upstream commit b40130b23ca4a08c5785d5a3559805916bddba3c ]
We have been hitting the following lockdep splat with btrfs/187 recently
WARN
btrfs: fix lockdep splat with reloc root extent buffers
[ Upstream commit b40130b23ca4a08c5785d5a3559805916bddba3c ]
We have been hitting the following lockdep splat with btrfs/187 recently
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
5.19.0-rc8+ #775 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
btrfs/752500 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff97e1875a97b8 (btrfs-treloc-02#2){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_lock+0x24/0x110
but task is already holding lock:
ffff97e1875a9278 (btrfs-tree-01/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_lock+0x24/0x110
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #2 (btrfs-tree-01/1){+.+.}-{3:3}:
down_write_nested+0x41/0x80
__btrfs_tree_lock+0x24/0x110
btrfs_init_new_buffer+0x7d/0x2c0
btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0x120/0x3b0
__btrfs_cow_block+0x136/0x600
btrfs_cow_block+0x10b/0x230
btrfs_search_slot+0x53b/0xb70
btrfs_lookup_inode+0x2a/0xa0
__btrfs_update_delayed_inode+0x5f/0x280
btrfs_async_run_delayed_root+0x24c/0x290
btrfs_work_helper+0xf2/0x3e0
process_one_work+0x271/0x590
worker_thread+0x52/0x3b0
kthread+0xf0/0x120
ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
-> #1 (btrfs-tree-01){++++}-{3:3}:
down_write_nested+0x41/0x80
__btrfs_tree_lock+0x24/0x110
btrfs_search_slot+0x3c3/0xb70
do_relocation+0x10c/0x6b0
relocate_tree_blocks+0x317/0x6d0
relocate_block_group+0x1f1/0x560
btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x23e/0x400
btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x4c/0x140
btrfs_balance+0x755/0xe40
btrfs_ioctl+0x1ea2/0x2c90
__x64_sys_ioctl+0x88/0xc0
do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
-> #0 (btrfs-treloc-02#2){+.+.}-{3:3}:
__lock_acquire+0x1122/0x1e10
lock_acquire+0xc2/0x2d0
down_write_nested+0x41/0x80
__btrfs_tree_lock+0x24/0x110
btrfs_lock_root_node+0x31/0x50
btrfs_search_slot+0x1cb/0xb70
replace_path+0x541/0x9f0
merge_reloc_root+0x1d6/0x610
merge_reloc_roots+0xe2/0x260
relocate_block_group+0x2c8/0x560
btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x23e/0x400
btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x4c/0x140
btrfs_balance+0x755/0xe40
btrfs_ioctl+0x1ea2/0x2c90
__x64_sys_ioctl+0x88/0xc0
do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
other info that might help us debug this:
Chain exists of:
btrfs-treloc-02#2 --> btrfs-tree-01 --> btrfs-tree-01/1
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(btrfs-tree-01/1);
lock(btrfs-tree-01);
lock(btrfs-tree-01/1);
lock(btrfs-treloc-02#2);
*** DEADLOCK ***
7 locks held by btrfs/752500:
#0: ffff97e292fdf460 (sb_writers#12){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: btrfs_ioctl+0x208/0x2c90
#1: ffff97e284c02050 (&fs_info->reclaim_bgs_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_balance+0x55f/0xe40
#2: ffff97e284c00878 (&fs_info->cleaner_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x236/0x400
#3: ffff97e292fdf650 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: merge_reloc_root+0xef/0x610
#4: ffff97e284c02378 (btrfs_trans_num_writers){++++}-{0:0}, at: join_transaction+0x1a8/0x5a0
#5: ffff97e284c023a0 (btrfs_trans_num_extwriters){++++}-{0:0}, at: join_transaction+0x1a8/0x5a0
#6: ffff97e1875a9278 (btrfs-tree-01/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_lock+0x24/0x110
stack backtrace:
CPU: 1 PID: 752500 Comm: btrfs Not tainted 5.19.0-rc8+ #775
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.13.0-2.fc32 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
dump_stack_lvl+0x56/0x73
check_noncircular+0xd6/0x100
? lock_is_held_type+0xe2/0x140
__lock_acquire+0x1122/0x1e10
lock_acquire+0xc2/0x2d0
? __btrfs_tree_lock+0x24/0x110
down_write_nested+0x41/0x80
? __btrfs_tree_lock+0x24/0x110
__btrfs_tree_lock+0x24/0x110
btrfs_lock_root_node+0x31/0x50
btrfs_search_slot+0x1cb/0xb70
? lock_release+0x137/0x2d0
? _raw_spin_unlock+0x29/0x50
? release_extent_buffer+0x128/0x180
replace_path+0x541/0x9f0
merge_reloc_root+0x1d6/0x610
merge_reloc_roots+0xe2/0x260
relocate_block_group+0x2c8/0x560
btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x23e/0x400
btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x4c/0x140
btrfs_balance+0x755/0xe40
btrfs_ioctl+0x1ea2/0x2c90
? lock_is_held_type+0xe2/0x140
? lock_is_held_type+0xe2/0x140
? __x64_sys_ioctl+0x88/0xc0
__x64_sys_ioctl+0x88/0xc0
do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
This isn't necessarily new, it's just tricky to hit in practice. There
are two competing things going on here. With relocation we create a
snapshot of every fs tree with a reloc tree. Any extent buffers that
get initialized here are initialized with the reloc root lockdep key.
However since it is a snapshot, any blocks that are currently in cache
that originally belonged to the fs tree will have the normal tree
lockdep key set. This creates the lock dependency of
reloc tree -> normal tree
for the extent buffer locking during the first phase of the relocation
as we walk down the reloc root to relocate blocks.
However this is problematic because the final phase of the relocation is
merging the reloc root into the original fs root. This involves
searching down to any keys that exist in the original fs root and then
swapping the relocated block and the original fs root block. We have to
search down to the fs root first, and then go search the reloc root for
the block we need to replace. This creates the dependency of
normal tree -> reloc tree
which is why lockdep complains.
Additionally even if we were to fix this particular mismatch with a
different nesting for the merge case, we're still slotting in a block
that has a owner of the reloc root objectid into a normal tree, so that
block will have its lockdep key set to the tree reloc root, and create a
lockdep splat later on when we wander into that block from the fs root.
Unfortunately the only solution here is to make sure we do not set the
lockdep key to the reloc tree lockdep key normally, and then reset any
blocks we wander into from the reloc root when we're doing the merged.
This solves the problem of having mixed tree reloc keys intermixed with
normal tree keys, and then allows us to make sure in the merge case we
maintain the lock order of
normal tree -> reloc tree
We handle this by setting a bit on the reloc root when we do the search
for the block we want to relocate, and any block we search into or COW
at that point gets set to the reloc tree key. This works correctly
because we only ever COW down to the parent node, so we aren't resetting
the key for the block we're linking into the fs root.
With this patch we no longer have the lockdep splat in btrfs/187.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
show more ...
|
| #
78f8c237 |
| 21-Jul-2022 |
Zixuan Fu <r33s3n6@gmail.com> |
btrfs: unset reloc control if transaction commit fails in prepare_to_relocate()
commit 85f02d6c856b9f3a0acf5219de6e32f58b9778eb upstream.
In btrfs_relocate_block_group(), the rc is allocated. Then
btrfs: unset reloc control if transaction commit fails in prepare_to_relocate()
commit 85f02d6c856b9f3a0acf5219de6e32f58b9778eb upstream.
In btrfs_relocate_block_group(), the rc is allocated. Then
btrfs_relocate_block_group() calls
relocate_block_group()
prepare_to_relocate()
set_reloc_control()
that assigns rc to the variable fs_info->reloc_ctl. When
prepare_to_relocate() returns, it calls
btrfs_commit_transaction()
btrfs_start_dirty_block_groups()
btrfs_alloc_path()
kmem_cache_zalloc()
which may fail for example (or other errors could happen). When the
failure occurs, btrfs_relocate_block_group() detects the error and frees
rc and doesn't set fs_info->reloc_ctl to NULL. After that, in
btrfs_init_reloc_root(), rc is retrieved from fs_info->reloc_ctl and
then used, which may cause a use-after-free bug.
This possible bug can be triggered by calling btrfs_ioctl_balance()
before calling btrfs_ioctl_defrag().
To fix this possible bug, in prepare_to_relocate(), check if
btrfs_commit_transaction() fails. If the failure occurs,
unset_reloc_control() is called to set fs_info->reloc_ctl to NULL.
The error log in our fault-injection testing is shown as follows:
[ 58.751070] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in btrfs_init_reloc_root+0x7ca/0x920 [btrfs]
...
[ 58.753577] Call Trace:
...
[ 58.755800] kasan_report+0x45/0x60
[ 58.756066] btrfs_init_reloc_root+0x7ca/0x920 [btrfs]
[ 58.757304] record_root_in_trans+0x792/0xa10 [btrfs]
[ 58.757748] btrfs_record_root_in_trans+0x463/0x4f0 [btrfs]
[ 58.758231] start_transaction+0x896/0x2950 [btrfs]
[ 58.758661] btrfs_defrag_root+0x250/0xc00 [btrfs]
[ 58.759083] btrfs_ioctl_defrag+0x467/0xa00 [btrfs]
[ 58.759513] btrfs_ioctl+0x3c95/0x114e0 [btrfs]
...
[ 58.768510] Allocated by task 23683:
[ 58.768777] ____kasan_kmalloc+0xb5/0xf0
[ 58.769069] __kmalloc+0x227/0x3d0
[ 58.769325] alloc_reloc_control+0x10a/0x3d0 [btrfs]
[ 58.769755] btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x7aa/0x1e20 [btrfs]
[ 58.770228] btrfs_relocate_chunk+0xf1/0x760 [btrfs]
[ 58.770655] __btrfs_balance+0x1326/0x1f10 [btrfs]
[ 58.771071] btrfs_balance+0x3150/0x3d30 [btrfs]
[ 58.771472] btrfs_ioctl_balance+0xd84/0x1410 [btrfs]
[ 58.771902] btrfs_ioctl+0x4caa/0x114e0 [btrfs]
...
[ 58.773337] Freed by task 23683:
...
[ 58.774815] kfree+0xda/0x2b0
[ 58.775038] free_reloc_control+0x1d6/0x220 [btrfs]
[ 58.775465] btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x115c/0x1e20 [btrfs]
[ 58.775944] btrfs_relocate_chunk+0xf1/0x760 [btrfs]
[ 58.776369] __btrfs_balance+0x1326/0x1f10 [btrfs]
[ 58.776784] btrfs_balance+0x3150/0x3d30 [btrfs]
[ 58.777185] btrfs_ioctl_balance+0xd84/0x1410 [btrfs]
[ 58.777621] btrfs_ioctl+0x4caa/0x114e0 [btrfs]
...
Reported-by: TOTE Robot <oslab@tsinghua.edu.cn>
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.15+
Reviewed-by: Sweet Tea Dorminy <sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me>
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Zixuan Fu <r33s3n6@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
show more ...
|
| #
70fc07e3 |
| 13-Oct-2021 |
Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> |
btrfs: fix deadlock between chunk allocation and chunk btree modifications
[ Upstream commit 2bb2e00ed9787e52580bb651264b8d6a2b7a9dd2 ]
When a task is doing some modification to the chunk btree and
btrfs: fix deadlock between chunk allocation and chunk btree modifications
[ Upstream commit 2bb2e00ed9787e52580bb651264b8d6a2b7a9dd2 ]
When a task is doing some modification to the chunk btree and it is not in
the context of a chunk allocation or a chunk removal, it can deadlock with
another task that is currently allocating a new data or metadata chunk.
These contexts are the following:
* When relocating a system chunk, when we need to COW the extent buffers
that belong to the chunk btree;
* When adding a new device (ioctl), where we need to add a new device item
to the chunk btree;
* When removing a device (ioctl), where we need to remove a device item
from the chunk btree;
* When resizing a device (ioctl), where we need to update a device item in
the chunk btree and may need to relocate a system chunk that lies beyond
the new device size when shrinking a device.
The problem happens due to a sequence of steps like the following:
1) Task A starts a data or metadata chunk allocation and it locks the
chunk mutex;
2) Task B is relocating a system chunk, and when it needs to COW an extent
buffer of the chunk btree, it has locked both that extent buffer as
well as its parent extent buffer;
3) Since there is not enough available system space, either because none
of the existing system block groups have enough free space or because
the only one with enough free space is in RO mode due to the relocation,
task B triggers a new system chunk allocation. It blocks when trying to
acquire the chunk mutex, currently held by task A;
4) Task A enters btrfs_chunk_alloc_add_chunk_item(), in order to insert
the new chunk item into the chunk btree and update the existing device
items there. But in order to do that, it has to lock the extent buffer
that task B locked at step 2, or its parent extent buffer, but task B
is waiting on the chunk mutex, which is currently locked by task A,
therefore resulting in a deadlock.
One example report when the deadlock happens with system chunk relocation:
INFO: task kworker/u9:5:546 blocked for more than 143 seconds.
Not tainted 5.15.0-rc3+ #1
"echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
task:kworker/u9:5 state:D stack:25936 pid: 546 ppid: 2 flags:0x00004000
Workqueue: events_unbound btrfs_async_reclaim_metadata_space
Call Trace:
context_switch kernel/sched/core.c:4940 [inline]
__schedule+0xcd9/0x2530 kernel/sched/core.c:6287
schedule+0xd3/0x270 kernel/sched/core.c:6366
rwsem_down_read_slowpath+0x4ee/0x9d0 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:993
__down_read_common kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1214 [inline]
__down_read kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1223 [inline]
down_read_nested+0xe6/0x440 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1590
__btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x31/0x350 fs/btrfs/locking.c:47
btrfs_tree_read_lock fs/btrfs/locking.c:54 [inline]
btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x8a/0x320 fs/btrfs/locking.c:191
btrfs_search_slot_get_root fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1623 [inline]
btrfs_search_slot+0x13b4/0x2140 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1728
btrfs_update_device+0x11f/0x500 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:2794
btrfs_chunk_alloc_add_chunk_item+0x34d/0xea0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:5504
do_chunk_alloc fs/btrfs/block-group.c:3408 [inline]
btrfs_chunk_alloc+0x84d/0xf50 fs/btrfs/block-group.c:3653
flush_space+0x54e/0xd80 fs/btrfs/space-info.c:670
btrfs_async_reclaim_metadata_space+0x396/0xa90 fs/btrfs/space-info.c:953
process_one_work+0x9df/0x16d0 kernel/workqueue.c:2297
worker_thread+0x90/0xed0 kernel/workqueue.c:2444
kthread+0x3e5/0x4d0 kernel/kthread.c:319
ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:295
INFO: task syz-executor:9107 blocked for more than 143 seconds.
Not tainted 5.15.0-rc3+ #1
"echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
task:syz-executor state:D stack:23200 pid: 9107 ppid: 7792 flags:0x00004004
Call Trace:
context_switch kernel/sched/core.c:4940 [inline]
__schedule+0xcd9/0x2530 kernel/sched/core.c:6287
schedule+0xd3/0x270 kernel/sched/core.c:6366
schedule_preempt_disabled+0xf/0x20 kernel/sched/core.c:6425
__mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:669 [inline]
__mutex_lock+0xc96/0x1680 kernel/locking/mutex.c:729
btrfs_chunk_alloc+0x31a/0xf50 fs/btrfs/block-group.c:3631
find_free_extent_update_loop fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:3986 [inline]
find_free_extent+0x25cb/0x3a30 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4335
btrfs_reserve_extent+0x1f1/0x500 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4415
btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0x203/0x1120 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4813
__btrfs_cow_block+0x412/0x1620 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:415
btrfs_cow_block+0x2f6/0x8c0 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:570
btrfs_search_slot+0x1094/0x2140 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1768
relocate_tree_block fs/btrfs/relocation.c:2694 [inline]
relocate_tree_blocks+0xf73/0x1770 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:2757
relocate_block_group+0x47e/0xc70 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:3673
btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x48a/0xc60 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:4070
btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x96/0x280 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:3181
__btrfs_balance fs/btrfs/volumes.c:3911 [inline]
btrfs_balance+0x1f03/0x3cd0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4301
btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x61e/0x800 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:4137
btrfs_ioctl+0x39ea/0x7b70 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:4949
vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]
__do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:874 [inline]
__se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:860 [inline]
__x64_sys_ioctl+0x193/0x200 fs/ioctl.c:860
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
So fix this by making sure that whenever we try to modify the chunk btree
and we are neither in a chunk allocation context nor in a chunk remove
context, we reserve system space before modifying the chunk btree.
Reported-by: Hao Sun <sunhao.th@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CACkBjsax51i4mu6C0C3vJqQN3NR_iVuucoeG3U1HXjrgzn5FFQ@mail.gmail.com/
Fixes: 79bd37120b1495 ("btrfs: rework chunk allocation to avoid exhaustion of the system chunk array")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.14+
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
show more ...
|
| #
66182050 |
| 12-Oct-2021 |
Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> |
btrfs: add additional parameters to btrfs_init_tree_ref/btrfs_init_data_ref
[ Upstream commit f42c5da6c12e990d8ec415199600b4d593c63bf5 ]
In order to make 'real_root' used only in ref-verify it's re
btrfs: add additional parameters to btrfs_init_tree_ref/btrfs_init_data_ref
[ Upstream commit f42c5da6c12e990d8ec415199600b4d593c63bf5 ]
In order to make 'real_root' used only in ref-verify it's required to
have the necessary context to perform the same checks that this member
is used for. So add 'mod_root' which will contain the root on behalf of
which a delayed ref was created and a 'skip_group' parameter which
will contain callsite-specific override of skip_qgroup.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
show more ...
|
| #
70fc07e3 |
| 13-Oct-2021 |
Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> |
btrfs: fix deadlock between chunk allocation and chunk btree modifications
[ Upstream commit 2bb2e00ed9787e52580bb651264b8d6a2b7a9dd2 ]
When a task is doing some modification to the chunk btree and
btrfs: fix deadlock between chunk allocation and chunk btree modifications
[ Upstream commit 2bb2e00ed9787e52580bb651264b8d6a2b7a9dd2 ]
When a task is doing some modification to the chunk btree and it is not in
the context of a chunk allocation or a chunk removal, it can deadlock with
another task that is currently allocating a new data or metadata chunk.
These contexts are the following:
* When relocating a system chunk, when we need to COW the extent buffers
that belong to the chunk btree;
* When adding a new device (ioctl), where we need to add a new device item
to the chunk btree;
* When removing a device (ioctl), where we need to remove a device item
from the chunk btree;
* When resizing a device (ioctl), where we need to update a device item in
the chunk btree and may need to relocate a system chunk that lies beyond
the new device size when shrinking a device.
The problem happens due to a sequence of steps like the following:
1) Task A starts a data or metadata chunk allocation and it locks the
chunk mutex;
2) Task B is relocating a system chunk, and when it needs to COW an extent
buffer of the chunk btree, it has locked both that extent buffer as
well as its parent extent buffer;
3) Since there is not enough available system space, either because none
of the existing system block groups have enough free space or because
the only one with enough free space is in RO mode due to the relocation,
task B triggers a new system chunk allocation. It blocks when trying to
acquire the chunk mutex, currently held by task A;
4) Task A enters btrfs_chunk_alloc_add_chunk_item(), in order to insert
the new chunk item into the chunk btree and update the existing device
items there. But in order to do that, it has to lock the extent buffer
that task B locked at step 2, or its parent extent buffer, but task B
is waiting on the chunk mutex, which is currently locked by task A,
therefore resulting in a deadlock.
One example report when the deadlock happens with system chunk relocation:
INFO: task kworker/u9:5:546 blocked for more than 143 seconds.
Not tainted 5.15.0-rc3+ #1
"echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
task:kworker/u9:5 state:D stack:25936 pid: 546 ppid: 2 flags:0x00004000
Workqueue: events_unbound btrfs_async_reclaim_metadata_space
Call Trace:
context_switch kernel/sched/core.c:4940 [inline]
__schedule+0xcd9/0x2530 kernel/sched/core.c:6287
schedule+0xd3/0x270 kernel/sched/core.c:6366
rwsem_down_read_slowpath+0x4ee/0x9d0 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:993
__down_read_common kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1214 [inline]
__down_read kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1223 [inline]
down_read_nested+0xe6/0x440 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1590
__btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x31/0x350 fs/btrfs/locking.c:47
btrfs_tree_read_lock fs/btrfs/locking.c:54 [inline]
btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x8a/0x320 fs/btrfs/locking.c:191
btrfs_search_slot_get_root fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1623 [inline]
btrfs_search_slot+0x13b4/0x2140 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1728
btrfs_update_device+0x11f/0x500 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:2794
btrfs_chunk_alloc_add_chunk_item+0x34d/0xea0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:5504
do_chunk_alloc fs/btrfs/block-group.c:3408 [inline]
btrfs_chunk_alloc+0x84d/0xf50 fs/btrfs/block-group.c:3653
flush_space+0x54e/0xd80 fs/btrfs/space-info.c:670
btrfs_async_reclaim_metadata_space+0x396/0xa90 fs/btrfs/space-info.c:953
process_one_work+0x9df/0x16d0 kernel/workqueue.c:2297
worker_thread+0x90/0xed0 kernel/workqueue.c:2444
kthread+0x3e5/0x4d0 kernel/kthread.c:319
ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:295
INFO: task syz-executor:9107 blocked for more than 143 seconds.
Not tainted 5.15.0-rc3+ #1
"echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
task:syz-executor state:D stack:23200 pid: 9107 ppid: 7792 flags:0x00004004
Call Trace:
context_switch kernel/sched/core.c:4940 [inline]
__schedule+0xcd9/0x2530 kernel/sched/core.c:6287
schedule+0xd3/0x270 kernel/sched/core.c:6366
schedule_preempt_disabled+0xf/0x20 kernel/sched/core.c:6425
__mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:669 [inline]
__mutex_lock+0xc96/0x1680 kernel/locking/mutex.c:729
btrfs_chunk_alloc+0x31a/0xf50 fs/btrfs/block-group.c:3631
find_free_extent_update_loop fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:3986 [inline]
find_free_extent+0x25cb/0x3a30 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4335
btrfs_reserve_extent+0x1f1/0x500 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4415
btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0x203/0x1120 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4813
__btrfs_cow_block+0x412/0x1620 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:415
btrfs_cow_block+0x2f6/0x8c0 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:570
btrfs_search_slot+0x1094/0x2140 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1768
relocate_tree_block fs/btrfs/relocation.c:2694 [inline]
relocate_tree_blocks+0xf73/0x1770 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:2757
relocate_block_group+0x47e/0xc70 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:3673
btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x48a/0xc60 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:4070
btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x96/0x280 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:3181
__btrfs_balance fs/btrfs/volumes.c:3911 [inline]
btrfs_balance+0x1f03/0x3cd0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4301
btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x61e/0x800 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:4137
btrfs_ioctl+0x39ea/0x7b70 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:4949
vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]
__do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:874 [inline]
__se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:860 [inline]
__x64_sys_ioctl+0x193/0x200 fs/ioctl.c:860
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
So fix this by making sure that whenever we try to modify the chunk btree
and we are neither in a chunk allocation context nor in a chunk remove
context, we reserve system space before modifying the chunk btree.
Reported-by: Hao Sun <sunhao.th@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CACkBjsax51i4mu6C0C3vJqQN3NR_iVuucoeG3U1HXjrgzn5FFQ@mail.gmail.com/
Fixes: 79bd37120b1495 ("btrfs: rework chunk allocation to avoid exhaustion of the system chunk array")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.14+
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
show more ...
|
| #
66182050 |
| 12-Oct-2021 |
Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> |
btrfs: add additional parameters to btrfs_init_tree_ref/btrfs_init_data_ref
[ Upstream commit f42c5da6c12e990d8ec415199600b4d593c63bf5 ]
In order to make 'real_root' used only in ref-verify it's re
btrfs: add additional parameters to btrfs_init_tree_ref/btrfs_init_data_ref
[ Upstream commit f42c5da6c12e990d8ec415199600b4d593c63bf5 ]
In order to make 'real_root' used only in ref-verify it's required to
have the necessary context to perform the same checks that this member
is used for. So add 'mod_root' which will contain the root on behalf of
which a delayed ref was created and a 'skip_group' parameter which
will contain callsite-specific override of skip_qgroup.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
show more ...
|
| #
70fc07e3 |
| 13-Oct-2021 |
Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> |
btrfs: fix deadlock between chunk allocation and chunk btree modifications
[ Upstream commit 2bb2e00ed9787e52580bb651264b8d6a2b7a9dd2 ]
When a task is doing some modification to the chunk btree and
btrfs: fix deadlock between chunk allocation and chunk btree modifications
[ Upstream commit 2bb2e00ed9787e52580bb651264b8d6a2b7a9dd2 ]
When a task is doing some modification to the chunk btree and it is not in
the context of a chunk allocation or a chunk removal, it can deadlock with
another task that is currently allocating a new data or metadata chunk.
These contexts are the following:
* When relocating a system chunk, when we need to COW the extent buffers
that belong to the chunk btree;
* When adding a new device (ioctl), where we need to add a new device item
to the chunk btree;
* When removing a device (ioctl), where we need to remove a device item
from the chunk btree;
* When resizing a device (ioctl), where we need to update a device item in
the chunk btree and may need to relocate a system chunk that lies beyond
the new device size when shrinking a device.
The problem happens due to a sequence of steps like the following:
1) Task A starts a data or metadata chunk allocation and it locks the
chunk mutex;
2) Task B is relocating a system chunk, and when it needs to COW an extent
buffer of the chunk btree, it has locked both that extent buffer as
well as its parent extent buffer;
3) Since there is not enough available system space, either because none
of the existing system block groups have enough free space or because
the only one with enough free space is in RO mode due to the relocation,
task B triggers a new system chunk allocation. It blocks when trying to
acquire the chunk mutex, currently held by task A;
4) Task A enters btrfs_chunk_alloc_add_chunk_item(), in order to insert
the new chunk item into the chunk btree and update the existing device
items there. But in order to do that, it has to lock the extent buffer
that task B locked at step 2, or its parent extent buffer, but task B
is waiting on the chunk mutex, which is currently locked by task A,
therefore resulting in a deadlock.
One example report when the deadlock happens with system chunk relocation:
INFO: task kworker/u9:5:546 blocked for more than 143 seconds.
Not tainted 5.15.0-rc3+ #1
"echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
task:kworker/u9:5 state:D stack:25936 pid: 546 ppid: 2 flags:0x00004000
Workqueue: events_unbound btrfs_async_reclaim_metadata_space
Call Trace:
context_switch kernel/sched/core.c:4940 [inline]
__schedule+0xcd9/0x2530 kernel/sched/core.c:6287
schedule+0xd3/0x270 kernel/sched/core.c:6366
rwsem_down_read_slowpath+0x4ee/0x9d0 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:993
__down_read_common kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1214 [inline]
__down_read kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1223 [inline]
down_read_nested+0xe6/0x440 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1590
__btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x31/0x350 fs/btrfs/locking.c:47
btrfs_tree_read_lock fs/btrfs/locking.c:54 [inline]
btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x8a/0x320 fs/btrfs/locking.c:191
btrfs_search_slot_get_root fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1623 [inline]
btrfs_search_slot+0x13b4/0x2140 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1728
btrfs_update_device+0x11f/0x500 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:2794
btrfs_chunk_alloc_add_chunk_item+0x34d/0xea0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:5504
do_chunk_alloc fs/btrfs/block-group.c:3408 [inline]
btrfs_chunk_alloc+0x84d/0xf50 fs/btrfs/block-group.c:3653
flush_space+0x54e/0xd80 fs/btrfs/space-info.c:670
btrfs_async_reclaim_metadata_space+0x396/0xa90 fs/btrfs/space-info.c:953
process_one_work+0x9df/0x16d0 kernel/workqueue.c:2297
worker_thread+0x90/0xed0 kernel/workqueue.c:2444
kthread+0x3e5/0x4d0 kernel/kthread.c:319
ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:295
INFO: task syz-executor:9107 blocked for more than 143 seconds.
Not tainted 5.15.0-rc3+ #1
"echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
task:syz-executor state:D stack:23200 pid: 9107 ppid: 7792 flags:0x00004004
Call Trace:
context_switch kernel/sched/core.c:4940 [inline]
__schedule+0xcd9/0x2530 kernel/sched/core.c:6287
schedule+0xd3/0x270 kernel/sched/core.c:6366
schedule_preempt_disabled+0xf/0x20 kernel/sched/core.c:6425
__mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:669 [inline]
__mutex_lock+0xc96/0x1680 kernel/locking/mutex.c:729
btrfs_chunk_alloc+0x31a/0xf50 fs/btrfs/block-group.c:3631
find_free_extent_update_loop fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:3986 [inline]
find_free_extent+0x25cb/0x3a30 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4335
btrfs_reserve_extent+0x1f1/0x500 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4415
btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0x203/0x1120 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4813
__btrfs_cow_block+0x412/0x1620 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:415
btrfs_cow_block+0x2f6/0x8c0 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:570
btrfs_search_slot+0x1094/0x2140 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1768
relocate_tree_block fs/btrfs/relocation.c:2694 [inline]
relocate_tree_blocks+0xf73/0x1770 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:2757
relocate_block_group+0x47e/0xc70 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:3673
btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x48a/0xc60 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:4070
btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x96/0x280 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:3181
__btrfs_balance fs/btrfs/volumes.c:3911 [inline]
btrfs_balance+0x1f03/0x3cd0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4301
btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x61e/0x800 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:4137
btrfs_ioctl+0x39ea/0x7b70 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:4949
vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]
__do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:874 [inline]
__se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:860 [inline]
__x64_sys_ioctl+0x193/0x200 fs/ioctl.c:860
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
So fix this by making sure that whenever we try to modify the chunk btree
and we are neither in a chunk allocation context nor in a chunk remove
context, we reserve system space before modifying the chunk btree.
Reported-by: Hao Sun <sunhao.th@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CACkBjsax51i4mu6C0C3vJqQN3NR_iVuucoeG3U1HXjrgzn5FFQ@mail.gmail.com/
Fixes: 79bd37120b1495 ("btrfs: rework chunk allocation to avoid exhaustion of the system chunk array")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.14+
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
show more ...
|
| #
66182050 |
| 12-Oct-2021 |
Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> |
btrfs: add additional parameters to btrfs_init_tree_ref/btrfs_init_data_ref
[ Upstream commit f42c5da6c12e990d8ec415199600b4d593c63bf5 ]
In order to make 'real_root' used only in ref-verify it's re
btrfs: add additional parameters to btrfs_init_tree_ref/btrfs_init_data_ref
[ Upstream commit f42c5da6c12e990d8ec415199600b4d593c63bf5 ]
In order to make 'real_root' used only in ref-verify it's required to
have the necessary context to perform the same checks that this member
is used for. So add 'mod_root' which will contain the root on behalf of
which a delayed ref was created and a 'skip_group' parameter which
will contain callsite-specific override of skip_qgroup.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
show more ...
|
| #
70fc07e3 |
| 13-Oct-2021 |
Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> |
btrfs: fix deadlock between chunk allocation and chunk btree modifications
[ Upstream commit 2bb2e00ed9787e52580bb651264b8d6a2b7a9dd2 ]
When a task is doing some modification to the chunk btree and
btrfs: fix deadlock between chunk allocation and chunk btree modifications
[ Upstream commit 2bb2e00ed9787e52580bb651264b8d6a2b7a9dd2 ]
When a task is doing some modification to the chunk btree and it is not in
the context of a chunk allocation or a chunk removal, it can deadlock with
another task that is currently allocating a new data or metadata chunk.
These contexts are the following:
* When relocating a system chunk, when we need to COW the extent buffers
that belong to the chunk btree;
* When adding a new device (ioctl), where we need to add a new device item
to the chunk btree;
* When removing a device (ioctl), where we need to remove a device item
from the chunk btree;
* When resizing a device (ioctl), where we need to update a device item in
the chunk btree and may need to relocate a system chunk that lies beyond
the new device size when shrinking a device.
The problem happens due to a sequence of steps like the following:
1) Task A starts a data or metadata chunk allocation and it locks the
chunk mutex;
2) Task B is relocating a system chunk, and when it needs to COW an extent
buffer of the chunk btree, it has locked both that extent buffer as
well as its parent extent buffer;
3) Since there is not enough available system space, either because none
of the existing system block groups have enough free space or because
the only one with enough free space is in RO mode due to the relocation,
task B triggers a new system chunk allocation. It blocks when trying to
acquire the chunk mutex, currently held by task A;
4) Task A enters btrfs_chunk_alloc_add_chunk_item(), in order to insert
the new chunk item into the chunk btree and update the existing device
items there. But in order to do that, it has to lock the extent buffer
that task B locked at step 2, or its parent extent buffer, but task B
is waiting on the chunk mutex, which is currently locked by task A,
therefore resulting in a deadlock.
One example report when the deadlock happens with system chunk relocation:
INFO: task kworker/u9:5:546 blocked for more than 143 seconds.
Not tainted 5.15.0-rc3+ #1
"echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
task:kworker/u9:5 state:D stack:25936 pid: 546 ppid: 2 flags:0x00004000
Workqueue: events_unbound btrfs_async_reclaim_metadata_space
Call Trace:
context_switch kernel/sched/core.c:4940 [inline]
__schedule+0xcd9/0x2530 kernel/sched/core.c:6287
schedule+0xd3/0x270 kernel/sched/core.c:6366
rwsem_down_read_slowpath+0x4ee/0x9d0 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:993
__down_read_common kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1214 [inline]
__down_read kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1223 [inline]
down_read_nested+0xe6/0x440 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1590
__btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x31/0x350 fs/btrfs/locking.c:47
btrfs_tree_read_lock fs/btrfs/locking.c:54 [inline]
btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x8a/0x320 fs/btrfs/locking.c:191
btrfs_search_slot_get_root fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1623 [inline]
btrfs_search_slot+0x13b4/0x2140 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1728
btrfs_update_device+0x11f/0x500 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:2794
btrfs_chunk_alloc_add_chunk_item+0x34d/0xea0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:5504
do_chunk_alloc fs/btrfs/block-group.c:3408 [inline]
btrfs_chunk_alloc+0x84d/0xf50 fs/btrfs/block-group.c:3653
flush_space+0x54e/0xd80 fs/btrfs/space-info.c:670
btrfs_async_reclaim_metadata_space+0x396/0xa90 fs/btrfs/space-info.c:953
process_one_work+0x9df/0x16d0 kernel/workqueue.c:2297
worker_thread+0x90/0xed0 kernel/workqueue.c:2444
kthread+0x3e5/0x4d0 kernel/kthread.c:319
ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:295
INFO: task syz-executor:9107 blocked for more than 143 seconds.
Not tainted 5.15.0-rc3+ #1
"echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
task:syz-executor state:D stack:23200 pid: 9107 ppid: 7792 flags:0x00004004
Call Trace:
context_switch kernel/sched/core.c:4940 [inline]
__schedule+0xcd9/0x2530 kernel/sched/core.c:6287
schedule+0xd3/0x270 kernel/sched/core.c:6366
schedule_preempt_disabled+0xf/0x20 kernel/sched/core.c:6425
__mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:669 [inline]
__mutex_lock+0xc96/0x1680 kernel/locking/mutex.c:729
btrfs_chunk_alloc+0x31a/0xf50 fs/btrfs/block-group.c:3631
find_free_extent_update_loop fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:3986 [inline]
find_free_extent+0x25cb/0x3a30 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4335
btrfs_reserve_extent+0x1f1/0x500 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4415
btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0x203/0x1120 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4813
__btrfs_cow_block+0x412/0x1620 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:415
btrfs_cow_block+0x2f6/0x8c0 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:570
btrfs_search_slot+0x1094/0x2140 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1768
relocate_tree_block fs/btrfs/relocation.c:2694 [inline]
relocate_tree_blocks+0xf73/0x1770 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:2757
relocate_block_group+0x47e/0xc70 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:3673
btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x48a/0xc60 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:4070
btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x96/0x280 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:3181
__btrfs_balance fs/btrfs/volumes.c:3911 [inline]
btrfs_balance+0x1f03/0x3cd0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4301
btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x61e/0x800 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:4137
btrfs_ioctl+0x39ea/0x7b70 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:4949
vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]
__do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:874 [inline]
__se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:860 [inline]
__x64_sys_ioctl+0x193/0x200 fs/ioctl.c:860
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
So fix this by making sure that whenever we try to modify the chunk btree
and we are neither in a chunk allocation context nor in a chunk remove
context, we reserve system space before modifying the chunk btree.
Reported-by: Hao Sun <sunhao.th@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CACkBjsax51i4mu6C0C3vJqQN3NR_iVuucoeG3U1HXjrgzn5FFQ@mail.gmail.com/
Fixes: 79bd37120b1495 ("btrfs: rework chunk allocation to avoid exhaustion of the system chunk array")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.14+
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
show more ...
|
| #
66182050 |
| 12-Oct-2021 |
Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> |
btrfs: add additional parameters to btrfs_init_tree_ref/btrfs_init_data_ref
[ Upstream commit f42c5da6c12e990d8ec415199600b4d593c63bf5 ]
In order to make 'real_root' used only in ref-verify it's re
btrfs: add additional parameters to btrfs_init_tree_ref/btrfs_init_data_ref
[ Upstream commit f42c5da6c12e990d8ec415199600b4d593c63bf5 ]
In order to make 'real_root' used only in ref-verify it's required to
have the necessary context to perform the same checks that this member
is used for. So add 'mod_root' which will contain the root on behalf of
which a delayed ref was created and a 'skip_group' parameter which
will contain callsite-specific override of skip_qgroup.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
show more ...
|
| #
70fc07e3 |
| 13-Oct-2021 |
Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> |
btrfs: fix deadlock between chunk allocation and chunk btree modifications
[ Upstream commit 2bb2e00ed9787e52580bb651264b8d6a2b7a9dd2 ]
When a task is doing some modification to the chunk btree and
btrfs: fix deadlock between chunk allocation and chunk btree modifications
[ Upstream commit 2bb2e00ed9787e52580bb651264b8d6a2b7a9dd2 ]
When a task is doing some modification to the chunk btree and it is not in
the context of a chunk allocation or a chunk removal, it can deadlock with
another task that is currently allocating a new data or metadata chunk.
These contexts are the following:
* When relocating a system chunk, when we need to COW the extent buffers
that belong to the chunk btree;
* When adding a new device (ioctl), where we need to add a new device item
to the chunk btree;
* When removing a device (ioctl), where we need to remove a device item
from the chunk btree;
* When resizing a device (ioctl), where we need to update a device item in
the chunk btree and may need to relocate a system chunk that lies beyond
the new device size when shrinking a device.
The problem happens due to a sequence of steps like the following:
1) Task A starts a data or metadata chunk allocation and it locks the
chunk mutex;
2) Task B is relocating a system chunk, and when it needs to COW an extent
buffer of the chunk btree, it has locked both that extent buffer as
well as its parent extent buffer;
3) Since there is not enough available system space, either because none
of the existing system block groups have enough free space or because
the only one with enough free space is in RO mode due to the relocation,
task B triggers a new system chunk allocation. It blocks when trying to
acquire the chunk mutex, currently held by task A;
4) Task A enters btrfs_chunk_alloc_add_chunk_item(), in order to insert
the new chunk item into the chunk btree and update the existing device
items there. But in order to do that, it has to lock the extent buffer
that task B locked at step 2, or its parent extent buffer, but task B
is waiting on the chunk mutex, which is currently locked by task A,
therefore resulting in a deadlock.
One example report when the deadlock happens with system chunk relocation:
INFO: task kworker/u9:5:546 blocked for more than 143 seconds.
Not tainted 5.15.0-rc3+ #1
"echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
task:kworker/u9:5 state:D stack:25936 pid: 546 ppid: 2 flags:0x00004000
Workqueue: events_unbound btrfs_async_reclaim_metadata_space
Call Trace:
context_switch kernel/sched/core.c:4940 [inline]
__schedule+0xcd9/0x2530 kernel/sched/core.c:6287
schedule+0xd3/0x270 kernel/sched/core.c:6366
rwsem_down_read_slowpath+0x4ee/0x9d0 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:993
__down_read_common kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1214 [inline]
__down_read kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1223 [inline]
down_read_nested+0xe6/0x440 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1590
__btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x31/0x350 fs/btrfs/locking.c:47
btrfs_tree_read_lock fs/btrfs/locking.c:54 [inline]
btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x8a/0x320 fs/btrfs/locking.c:191
btrfs_search_slot_get_root fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1623 [inline]
btrfs_search_slot+0x13b4/0x2140 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1728
btrfs_update_device+0x11f/0x500 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:2794
btrfs_chunk_alloc_add_chunk_item+0x34d/0xea0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:5504
do_chunk_alloc fs/btrfs/block-group.c:3408 [inline]
btrfs_chunk_alloc+0x84d/0xf50 fs/btrfs/block-group.c:3653
flush_space+0x54e/0xd80 fs/btrfs/space-info.c:670
btrfs_async_reclaim_metadata_space+0x396/0xa90 fs/btrfs/space-info.c:953
process_one_work+0x9df/0x16d0 kernel/workqueue.c:2297
worker_thread+0x90/0xed0 kernel/workqueue.c:2444
kthread+0x3e5/0x4d0 kernel/kthread.c:319
ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:295
INFO: task syz-executor:9107 blocked for more than 143 seconds.
Not tainted 5.15.0-rc3+ #1
"echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
task:syz-executor state:D stack:23200 pid: 9107 ppid: 7792 flags:0x00004004
Call Trace:
context_switch kernel/sched/core.c:4940 [inline]
__schedule+0xcd9/0x2530 kernel/sched/core.c:6287
schedule+0xd3/0x270 kernel/sched/core.c:6366
schedule_preempt_disabled+0xf/0x20 kernel/sched/core.c:6425
__mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:669 [inline]
__mutex_lock+0xc96/0x1680 kernel/locking/mutex.c:729
btrfs_chunk_alloc+0x31a/0xf50 fs/btrfs/block-group.c:3631
find_free_extent_update_loop fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:3986 [inline]
find_free_extent+0x25cb/0x3a30 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4335
btrfs_reserve_extent+0x1f1/0x500 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4415
btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0x203/0x1120 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4813
__btrfs_cow_block+0x412/0x1620 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:415
btrfs_cow_block+0x2f6/0x8c0 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:570
btrfs_search_slot+0x1094/0x2140 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1768
relocate_tree_block fs/btrfs/relocation.c:2694 [inline]
relocate_tree_blocks+0xf73/0x1770 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:2757
relocate_block_group+0x47e/0xc70 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:3673
btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x48a/0xc60 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:4070
btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x96/0x280 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:3181
__btrfs_balance fs/btrfs/volumes.c:3911 [inline]
btrfs_balance+0x1f03/0x3cd0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4301
btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x61e/0x800 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:4137
btrfs_ioctl+0x39ea/0x7b70 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:4949
vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]
__do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:874 [inline]
__se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:860 [inline]
__x64_sys_ioctl+0x193/0x200 fs/ioctl.c:860
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
So fix this by making sure that whenever we try to modify the chunk btree
and we are neither in a chunk allocation context nor in a chunk remove
context, we reserve system space before modifying the chunk btree.
Reported-by: Hao Sun <sunhao.th@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CACkBjsax51i4mu6C0C3vJqQN3NR_iVuucoeG3U1HXjrgzn5FFQ@mail.gmail.com/
Fixes: 79bd37120b1495 ("btrfs: rework chunk allocation to avoid exhaustion of the system chunk array")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.14+
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
show more ...
|
| #
66182050 |
| 12-Oct-2021 |
Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> |
btrfs: add additional parameters to btrfs_init_tree_ref/btrfs_init_data_ref
[ Upstream commit f42c5da6c12e990d8ec415199600b4d593c63bf5 ]
In order to make 'real_root' used only in ref-verify it's re
btrfs: add additional parameters to btrfs_init_tree_ref/btrfs_init_data_ref
[ Upstream commit f42c5da6c12e990d8ec415199600b4d593c63bf5 ]
In order to make 'real_root' used only in ref-verify it's required to
have the necessary context to perform the same checks that this member
is used for. So add 'mod_root' which will contain the root on behalf of
which a delayed ref was created and a 'skip_group' parameter which
will contain callsite-specific override of skip_qgroup.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
show more ...
|
| #
70fc07e3 |
| 13-Oct-2021 |
Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> |
btrfs: fix deadlock between chunk allocation and chunk btree modifications
[ Upstream commit 2bb2e00ed9787e52580bb651264b8d6a2b7a9dd2 ]
When a task is doing some modification to the chunk btree and
btrfs: fix deadlock between chunk allocation and chunk btree modifications
[ Upstream commit 2bb2e00ed9787e52580bb651264b8d6a2b7a9dd2 ]
When a task is doing some modification to the chunk btree and it is not in
the context of a chunk allocation or a chunk removal, it can deadlock with
another task that is currently allocating a new data or metadata chunk.
These contexts are the following:
* When relocating a system chunk, when we need to COW the extent buffers
that belong to the chunk btree;
* When adding a new device (ioctl), where we need to add a new device item
to the chunk btree;
* When removing a device (ioctl), where we need to remove a device item
from the chunk btree;
* When resizing a device (ioctl), where we need to update a device item in
the chunk btree and may need to relocate a system chunk that lies beyond
the new device size when shrinking a device.
The problem happens due to a sequence of steps like the following:
1) Task A starts a data or metadata chunk allocation and it locks the
chunk mutex;
2) Task B is relocating a system chunk, and when it needs to COW an extent
buffer of the chunk btree, it has locked both that extent buffer as
well as its parent extent buffer;
3) Since there is not enough available system space, either because none
of the existing system block groups have enough free space or because
the only one with enough free space is in RO mode due to the relocation,
task B triggers a new system chunk allocation. It blocks when trying to
acquire the chunk mutex, currently held by task A;
4) Task A enters btrfs_chunk_alloc_add_chunk_item(), in order to insert
the new chunk item into the chunk btree and update the existing device
items there. But in order to do that, it has to lock the extent buffer
that task B locked at step 2, or its parent extent buffer, but task B
is waiting on the chunk mutex, which is currently locked by task A,
therefore resulting in a deadlock.
One example report when the deadlock happens with system chunk relocation:
INFO: task kworker/u9:5:546 blocked for more than 143 seconds.
Not tainted 5.15.0-rc3+ #1
"echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
task:kworker/u9:5 state:D stack:25936 pid: 546 ppid: 2 flags:0x00004000
Workqueue: events_unbound btrfs_async_reclaim_metadata_space
Call Trace:
context_switch kernel/sched/core.c:4940 [inline]
__schedule+0xcd9/0x2530 kernel/sched/core.c:6287
schedule+0xd3/0x270 kernel/sched/core.c:6366
rwsem_down_read_slowpath+0x4ee/0x9d0 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:993
__down_read_common kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1214 [inline]
__down_read kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1223 [inline]
down_read_nested+0xe6/0x440 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1590
__btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x31/0x350 fs/btrfs/locking.c:47
btrfs_tree_read_lock fs/btrfs/locking.c:54 [inline]
btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x8a/0x320 fs/btrfs/locking.c:191
btrfs_search_slot_get_root fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1623 [inline]
btrfs_search_slot+0x13b4/0x2140 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1728
btrfs_update_device+0x11f/0x500 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:2794
btrfs_chunk_alloc_add_chunk_item+0x34d/0xea0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:5504
do_chunk_alloc fs/btrfs/block-group.c:3408 [inline]
btrfs_chunk_alloc+0x84d/0xf50 fs/btrfs/block-group.c:3653
flush_space+0x54e/0xd80 fs/btrfs/space-info.c:670
btrfs_async_reclaim_metadata_space+0x396/0xa90 fs/btrfs/space-info.c:953
process_one_work+0x9df/0x16d0 kernel/workqueue.c:2297
worker_thread+0x90/0xed0 kernel/workqueue.c:2444
kthread+0x3e5/0x4d0 kernel/kthread.c:319
ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:295
INFO: task syz-executor:9107 blocked for more than 143 seconds.
Not tainted 5.15.0-rc3+ #1
"echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
task:syz-executor state:D stack:23200 pid: 9107 ppid: 7792 flags:0x00004004
Call Trace:
context_switch kernel/sched/core.c:4940 [inline]
__schedule+0xcd9/0x2530 kernel/sched/core.c:6287
schedule+0xd3/0x270 kernel/sched/core.c:6366
schedule_preempt_disabled+0xf/0x20 kernel/sched/core.c:6425
__mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:669 [inline]
__mutex_lock+0xc96/0x1680 kernel/locking/mutex.c:729
btrfs_chunk_alloc+0x31a/0xf50 fs/btrfs/block-group.c:3631
find_free_extent_update_loop fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:3986 [inline]
find_free_extent+0x25cb/0x3a30 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4335
btrfs_reserve_extent+0x1f1/0x500 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4415
btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0x203/0x1120 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4813
__btrfs_cow_block+0x412/0x1620 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:415
btrfs_cow_block+0x2f6/0x8c0 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:570
btrfs_search_slot+0x1094/0x2140 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1768
relocate_tree_block fs/btrfs/relocation.c:2694 [inline]
relocate_tree_blocks+0xf73/0x1770 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:2757
relocate_block_group+0x47e/0xc70 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:3673
btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x48a/0xc60 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:4070
btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x96/0x280 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:3181
__btrfs_balance fs/btrfs/volumes.c:3911 [inline]
btrfs_balance+0x1f03/0x3cd0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4301
btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x61e/0x800 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:4137
btrfs_ioctl+0x39ea/0x7b70 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:4949
vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]
__do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:874 [inline]
__se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:860 [inline]
__x64_sys_ioctl+0x193/0x200 fs/ioctl.c:860
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
So fix this by making sure that whenever we try to modify the chunk btree
and we are neither in a chunk allocation context nor in a chunk remove
context, we reserve system space before modifying the chunk btree.
Reported-by: Hao Sun <sunhao.th@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CACkBjsax51i4mu6C0C3vJqQN3NR_iVuucoeG3U1HXjrgzn5FFQ@mail.gmail.com/
Fixes: 79bd37120b1495 ("btrfs: rework chunk allocation to avoid exhaustion of the system chunk array")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.14+
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
show more ...
|
| #
66182050 |
| 12-Oct-2021 |
Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> |
btrfs: add additional parameters to btrfs_init_tree_ref/btrfs_init_data_ref
[ Upstream commit f42c5da6c12e990d8ec415199600b4d593c63bf5 ]
In order to make 'real_root' used only in ref-verify it's re
btrfs: add additional parameters to btrfs_init_tree_ref/btrfs_init_data_ref
[ Upstream commit f42c5da6c12e990d8ec415199600b4d593c63bf5 ]
In order to make 'real_root' used only in ref-verify it's required to
have the necessary context to perform the same checks that this member
is used for. So add 'mod_root' which will contain the root on behalf of
which a delayed ref was created and a 'skip_group' parameter which
will contain callsite-specific override of skip_qgroup.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
show more ...
|
| #
70fc07e3 |
| 13-Oct-2021 |
Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> |
btrfs: fix deadlock between chunk allocation and chunk btree modifications
[ Upstream commit 2bb2e00ed9787e52580bb651264b8d6a2b7a9dd2 ]
When a task is doing some modification to the chunk btree and
btrfs: fix deadlock between chunk allocation and chunk btree modifications
[ Upstream commit 2bb2e00ed9787e52580bb651264b8d6a2b7a9dd2 ]
When a task is doing some modification to the chunk btree and it is not in
the context of a chunk allocation or a chunk removal, it can deadlock with
another task that is currently allocating a new data or metadata chunk.
These contexts are the following:
* When relocating a system chunk, when we need to COW the extent buffers
that belong to the chunk btree;
* When adding a new device (ioctl), where we need to add a new device item
to the chunk btree;
* When removing a device (ioctl), where we need to remove a device item
from the chunk btree;
* When resizing a device (ioctl), where we need to update a device item in
the chunk btree and may need to relocate a system chunk that lies beyond
the new device size when shrinking a device.
The problem happens due to a sequence of steps like the following:
1) Task A starts a data or metadata chunk allocation and it locks the
chunk mutex;
2) Task B is relocating a system chunk, and when it needs to COW an extent
buffer of the chunk btree, it has locked both that extent buffer as
well as its parent extent buffer;
3) Since there is not enough available system space, either because none
of the existing system block groups have enough free space or because
the only one with enough free space is in RO mode due to the relocation,
task B triggers a new system chunk allocation. It blocks when trying to
acquire the chunk mutex, currently held by task A;
4) Task A enters btrfs_chunk_alloc_add_chunk_item(), in order to insert
the new chunk item into the chunk btree and update the existing device
items there. But in order to do that, it has to lock the extent buffer
that task B locked at step 2, or its parent extent buffer, but task B
is waiting on the chunk mutex, which is currently locked by task A,
therefore resulting in a deadlock.
One example report when the deadlock happens with system chunk relocation:
INFO: task kworker/u9:5:546 blocked for more than 143 seconds.
Not tainted 5.15.0-rc3+ #1
"echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
task:kworker/u9:5 state:D stack:25936 pid: 546 ppid: 2 flags:0x00004000
Workqueue: events_unbound btrfs_async_reclaim_metadata_space
Call Trace:
context_switch kernel/sched/core.c:4940 [inline]
__schedule+0xcd9/0x2530 kernel/sched/core.c:6287
schedule+0xd3/0x270 kernel/sched/core.c:6366
rwsem_down_read_slowpath+0x4ee/0x9d0 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:993
__down_read_common kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1214 [inline]
__down_read kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1223 [inline]
down_read_nested+0xe6/0x440 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1590
__btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x31/0x350 fs/btrfs/locking.c:47
btrfs_tree_read_lock fs/btrfs/locking.c:54 [inline]
btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x8a/0x320 fs/btrfs/locking.c:191
btrfs_search_slot_get_root fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1623 [inline]
btrfs_search_slot+0x13b4/0x2140 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1728
btrfs_update_device+0x11f/0x500 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:2794
btrfs_chunk_alloc_add_chunk_item+0x34d/0xea0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:5504
do_chunk_alloc fs/btrfs/block-group.c:3408 [inline]
btrfs_chunk_alloc+0x84d/0xf50 fs/btrfs/block-group.c:3653
flush_space+0x54e/0xd80 fs/btrfs/space-info.c:670
btrfs_async_reclaim_metadata_space+0x396/0xa90 fs/btrfs/space-info.c:953
process_one_work+0x9df/0x16d0 kernel/workqueue.c:2297
worker_thread+0x90/0xed0 kernel/workqueue.c:2444
kthread+0x3e5/0x4d0 kernel/kthread.c:319
ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:295
INFO: task syz-executor:9107 blocked for more than 143 seconds.
Not tainted 5.15.0-rc3+ #1
"echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
task:syz-executor state:D stack:23200 pid: 9107 ppid: 7792 flags:0x00004004
Call Trace:
context_switch kernel/sched/core.c:4940 [inline]
__schedule+0xcd9/0x2530 kernel/sched/core.c:6287
schedule+0xd3/0x270 kernel/sched/core.c:6366
schedule_preempt_disabled+0xf/0x20 kernel/sched/core.c:6425
__mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:669 [inline]
__mutex_lock+0xc96/0x1680 kernel/locking/mutex.c:729
btrfs_chunk_alloc+0x31a/0xf50 fs/btrfs/block-group.c:3631
find_free_extent_update_loop fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:3986 [inline]
find_free_extent+0x25cb/0x3a30 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4335
btrfs_reserve_extent+0x1f1/0x500 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4415
btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0x203/0x1120 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4813
__btrfs_cow_block+0x412/0x1620 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:415
btrfs_cow_block+0x2f6/0x8c0 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:570
btrfs_search_slot+0x1094/0x2140 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1768
relocate_tree_block fs/btrfs/relocation.c:2694 [inline]
relocate_tree_blocks+0xf73/0x1770 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:2757
relocate_block_group+0x47e/0xc70 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:3673
btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x48a/0xc60 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:4070
btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x96/0x280 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:3181
__btrfs_balance fs/btrfs/volumes.c:3911 [inline]
btrfs_balance+0x1f03/0x3cd0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4301
btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x61e/0x800 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:4137
btrfs_ioctl+0x39ea/0x7b70 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:4949
vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]
__do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:874 [inline]
__se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:860 [inline]
__x64_sys_ioctl+0x193/0x200 fs/ioctl.c:860
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
So fix this by making sure that whenever we try to modify the chunk btree
and we are neither in a chunk allocation context nor in a chunk remove
context, we reserve system space before modifying the chunk btree.
Reported-by: Hao Sun <sunhao.th@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CACkBjsax51i4mu6C0C3vJqQN3NR_iVuucoeG3U1HXjrgzn5FFQ@mail.gmail.com/
Fixes: 79bd37120b1495 ("btrfs: rework chunk allocation to avoid exhaustion of the system chunk array")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.14+
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
show more ...
|
| #
66182050 |
| 12-Oct-2021 |
Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> |
btrfs: add additional parameters to btrfs_init_tree_ref/btrfs_init_data_ref
[ Upstream commit f42c5da6c12e990d8ec415199600b4d593c63bf5 ]
In order to make 'real_root' used only in ref-verify it's re
btrfs: add additional parameters to btrfs_init_tree_ref/btrfs_init_data_ref
[ Upstream commit f42c5da6c12e990d8ec415199600b4d593c63bf5 ]
In order to make 'real_root' used only in ref-verify it's required to
have the necessary context to perform the same checks that this member
is used for. So add 'mod_root' which will contain the root on behalf of
which a delayed ref was created and a 'skip_group' parameter which
will contain callsite-specific override of skip_qgroup.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
show more ...
|
| #
70fc07e3 |
| 13-Oct-2021 |
Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> |
btrfs: fix deadlock between chunk allocation and chunk btree modifications
[ Upstream commit 2bb2e00ed9787e52580bb651264b8d6a2b7a9dd2 ]
When a task is doing some modification to the chunk btree and
btrfs: fix deadlock between chunk allocation and chunk btree modifications
[ Upstream commit 2bb2e00ed9787e52580bb651264b8d6a2b7a9dd2 ]
When a task is doing some modification to the chunk btree and it is not in
the context of a chunk allocation or a chunk removal, it can deadlock with
another task that is currently allocating a new data or metadata chunk.
These contexts are the following:
* When relocating a system chunk, when we need to COW the extent buffers
that belong to the chunk btree;
* When adding a new device (ioctl), where we need to add a new device item
to the chunk btree;
* When removing a device (ioctl), where we need to remove a device item
from the chunk btree;
* When resizing a device (ioctl), where we need to update a device item in
the chunk btree and may need to relocate a system chunk that lies beyond
the new device size when shrinking a device.
The problem happens due to a sequence of steps like the following:
1) Task A starts a data or metadata chunk allocation and it locks the
chunk mutex;
2) Task B is relocating a system chunk, and when it needs to COW an extent
buffer of the chunk btree, it has locked both that extent buffer as
well as its parent extent buffer;
3) Since there is not enough available system space, either because none
of the existing system block groups have enough free space or because
the only one with enough free space is in RO mode due to the relocation,
task B triggers a new system chunk allocation. It blocks when trying to
acquire the chunk mutex, currently held by task A;
4) Task A enters btrfs_chunk_alloc_add_chunk_item(), in order to insert
the new chunk item into the chunk btree and update the existing device
items there. But in order to do that, it has to lock the extent buffer
that task B locked at step 2, or its parent extent buffer, but task B
is waiting on the chunk mutex, which is currently locked by task A,
therefore resulting in a deadlock.
One example report when the deadlock happens with system chunk relocation:
INFO: task kworker/u9:5:546 blocked for more than 143 seconds.
Not tainted 5.15.0-rc3+ #1
"echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
task:kworker/u9:5 state:D stack:25936 pid: 546 ppid: 2 flags:0x00004000
Workqueue: events_unbound btrfs_async_reclaim_metadata_space
Call Trace:
context_switch kernel/sched/core.c:4940 [inline]
__schedule+0xcd9/0x2530 kernel/sched/core.c:6287
schedule+0xd3/0x270 kernel/sched/core.c:6366
rwsem_down_read_slowpath+0x4ee/0x9d0 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:993
__down_read_common kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1214 [inline]
__down_read kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1223 [inline]
down_read_nested+0xe6/0x440 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1590
__btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x31/0x350 fs/btrfs/locking.c:47
btrfs_tree_read_lock fs/btrfs/locking.c:54 [inline]
btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x8a/0x320 fs/btrfs/locking.c:191
btrfs_search_slot_get_root fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1623 [inline]
btrfs_search_slot+0x13b4/0x2140 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1728
btrfs_update_device+0x11f/0x500 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:2794
btrfs_chunk_alloc_add_chunk_item+0x34d/0xea0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:5504
do_chunk_alloc fs/btrfs/block-group.c:3408 [inline]
btrfs_chunk_alloc+0x84d/0xf50 fs/btrfs/block-group.c:3653
flush_space+0x54e/0xd80 fs/btrfs/space-info.c:670
btrfs_async_reclaim_metadata_space+0x396/0xa90 fs/btrfs/space-info.c:953
process_one_work+0x9df/0x16d0 kernel/workqueue.c:2297
worker_thread+0x90/0xed0 kernel/workqueue.c:2444
kthread+0x3e5/0x4d0 kernel/kthread.c:319
ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:295
INFO: task syz-executor:9107 blocked for more than 143 seconds.
Not tainted 5.15.0-rc3+ #1
"echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
task:syz-executor state:D stack:23200 pid: 9107 ppid: 7792 flags:0x00004004
Call Trace:
context_switch kernel/sched/core.c:4940 [inline]
__schedule+0xcd9/0x2530 kernel/sched/core.c:6287
schedule+0xd3/0x270 kernel/sched/core.c:6366
schedule_preempt_disabled+0xf/0x20 kernel/sched/core.c:6425
__mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:669 [inline]
__mutex_lock+0xc96/0x1680 kernel/locking/mutex.c:729
btrfs_chunk_alloc+0x31a/0xf50 fs/btrfs/block-group.c:3631
find_free_extent_update_loop fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:3986 [inline]
find_free_extent+0x25cb/0x3a30 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4335
btrfs_reserve_extent+0x1f1/0x500 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4415
btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0x203/0x1120 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4813
__btrfs_cow_block+0x412/0x1620 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:415
btrfs_cow_block+0x2f6/0x8c0 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:570
btrfs_search_slot+0x1094/0x2140 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1768
relocate_tree_block fs/btrfs/relocation.c:2694 [inline]
relocate_tree_blocks+0xf73/0x1770 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:2757
relocate_block_group+0x47e/0xc70 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:3673
btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x48a/0xc60 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:4070
btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x96/0x280 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:3181
__btrfs_balance fs/btrfs/volumes.c:3911 [inline]
btrfs_balance+0x1f03/0x3cd0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4301
btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x61e/0x800 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:4137
btrfs_ioctl+0x39ea/0x7b70 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:4949
vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]
__do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:874 [inline]
__se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:860 [inline]
__x64_sys_ioctl+0x193/0x200 fs/ioctl.c:860
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
So fix this by making sure that whenever we try to modify the chunk btree
and we are neither in a chunk allocation context nor in a chunk remove
context, we reserve system space before modifying the chunk btree.
Reported-by: Hao Sun <sunhao.th@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CACkBjsax51i4mu6C0C3vJqQN3NR_iVuucoeG3U1HXjrgzn5FFQ@mail.gmail.com/
Fixes: 79bd37120b1495 ("btrfs: rework chunk allocation to avoid exhaustion of the system chunk array")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.14+
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
show more ...
|
| #
66182050 |
| 12-Oct-2021 |
Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> |
btrfs: add additional parameters to btrfs_init_tree_ref/btrfs_init_data_ref
[ Upstream commit f42c5da6c12e990d8ec415199600b4d593c63bf5 ]
In order to make 'real_root' used only in ref-verify it's re
btrfs: add additional parameters to btrfs_init_tree_ref/btrfs_init_data_ref
[ Upstream commit f42c5da6c12e990d8ec415199600b4d593c63bf5 ]
In order to make 'real_root' used only in ref-verify it's required to
have the necessary context to perform the same checks that this member
is used for. So add 'mod_root' which will contain the root on behalf of
which a delayed ref was created and a 'skip_group' parameter which
will contain callsite-specific override of skip_qgroup.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
show more ...
|
| #
70fc07e3 |
| 13-Oct-2021 |
Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> |
btrfs: fix deadlock between chunk allocation and chunk btree modifications
[ Upstream commit 2bb2e00ed9787e52580bb651264b8d6a2b7a9dd2 ]
When a task is doing some modification to the chunk btree and
btrfs: fix deadlock between chunk allocation and chunk btree modifications
[ Upstream commit 2bb2e00ed9787e52580bb651264b8d6a2b7a9dd2 ]
When a task is doing some modification to the chunk btree and it is not in
the context of a chunk allocation or a chunk removal, it can deadlock with
another task that is currently allocating a new data or metadata chunk.
These contexts are the following:
* When relocating a system chunk, when we need to COW the extent buffers
that belong to the chunk btree;
* When adding a new device (ioctl), where we need to add a new device item
to the chunk btree;
* When removing a device (ioctl), where we need to remove a device item
from the chunk btree;
* When resizing a device (ioctl), where we need to update a device item in
the chunk btree and may need to relocate a system chunk that lies beyond
the new device size when shrinking a device.
The problem happens due to a sequence of steps like the following:
1) Task A starts a data or metadata chunk allocation and it locks the
chunk mutex;
2) Task B is relocating a system chunk, and when it needs to COW an extent
buffer of the chunk btree, it has locked both that extent buffer as
well as its parent extent buffer;
3) Since there is not enough available system space, either because none
of the existing system block groups have enough free space or because
the only one with enough free space is in RO mode due to the relocation,
task B triggers a new system chunk allocation. It blocks when trying to
acquire the chunk mutex, currently held by task A;
4) Task A enters btrfs_chunk_alloc_add_chunk_item(), in order to insert
the new chunk item into the chunk btree and update the existing device
items there. But in order to do that, it has to lock the extent buffer
that task B locked at step 2, or its parent extent buffer, but task B
is waiting on the chunk mutex, which is currently locked by task A,
therefore resulting in a deadlock.
One example report when the deadlock happens with system chunk relocation:
INFO: task kworker/u9:5:546 blocked for more than 143 seconds.
Not tainted 5.15.0-rc3+ #1
"echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
task:kworker/u9:5 state:D stack:25936 pid: 546 ppid: 2 flags:0x00004000
Workqueue: events_unbound btrfs_async_reclaim_metadata_space
Call Trace:
context_switch kernel/sched/core.c:4940 [inline]
__schedule+0xcd9/0x2530 kernel/sched/core.c:6287
schedule+0xd3/0x270 kernel/sched/core.c:6366
rwsem_down_read_slowpath+0x4ee/0x9d0 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:993
__down_read_common kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1214 [inline]
__down_read kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1223 [inline]
down_read_nested+0xe6/0x440 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1590
__btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x31/0x350 fs/btrfs/locking.c:47
btrfs_tree_read_lock fs/btrfs/locking.c:54 [inline]
btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x8a/0x320 fs/btrfs/locking.c:191
btrfs_search_slot_get_root fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1623 [inline]
btrfs_search_slot+0x13b4/0x2140 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1728
btrfs_update_device+0x11f/0x500 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:2794
btrfs_chunk_alloc_add_chunk_item+0x34d/0xea0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:5504
do_chunk_alloc fs/btrfs/block-group.c:3408 [inline]
btrfs_chunk_alloc+0x84d/0xf50 fs/btrfs/block-group.c:3653
flush_space+0x54e/0xd80 fs/btrfs/space-info.c:670
btrfs_async_reclaim_metadata_space+0x396/0xa90 fs/btrfs/space-info.c:953
process_one_work+0x9df/0x16d0 kernel/workqueue.c:2297
worker_thread+0x90/0xed0 kernel/workqueue.c:2444
kthread+0x3e5/0x4d0 kernel/kthread.c:319
ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:295
INFO: task syz-executor:9107 blocked for more than 143 seconds.
Not tainted 5.15.0-rc3+ #1
"echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
task:syz-executor state:D stack:23200 pid: 9107 ppid: 7792 flags:0x00004004
Call Trace:
context_switch kernel/sched/core.c:4940 [inline]
__schedule+0xcd9/0x2530 kernel/sched/core.c:6287
schedule+0xd3/0x270 kernel/sched/core.c:6366
schedule_preempt_disabled+0xf/0x20 kernel/sched/core.c:6425
__mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:669 [inline]
__mutex_lock+0xc96/0x1680 kernel/locking/mutex.c:729
btrfs_chunk_alloc+0x31a/0xf50 fs/btrfs/block-group.c:3631
find_free_extent_update_loop fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:3986 [inline]
find_free_extent+0x25cb/0x3a30 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4335
btrfs_reserve_extent+0x1f1/0x500 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4415
btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0x203/0x1120 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4813
__btrfs_cow_block+0x412/0x1620 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:415
btrfs_cow_block+0x2f6/0x8c0 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:570
btrfs_search_slot+0x1094/0x2140 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1768
relocate_tree_block fs/btrfs/relocation.c:2694 [inline]
relocate_tree_blocks+0xf73/0x1770 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:2757
relocate_block_group+0x47e/0xc70 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:3673
btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x48a/0xc60 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:4070
btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x96/0x280 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:3181
__btrfs_balance fs/btrfs/volumes.c:3911 [inline]
btrfs_balance+0x1f03/0x3cd0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4301
btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x61e/0x800 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:4137
btrfs_ioctl+0x39ea/0x7b70 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:4949
vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]
__do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:874 [inline]
__se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:860 [inline]
__x64_sys_ioctl+0x193/0x200 fs/ioctl.c:860
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
So fix this by making sure that whenever we try to modify the chunk btree
and we are neither in a chunk allocation context nor in a chunk remove
context, we reserve system space before modifying the chunk btree.
Reported-by: Hao Sun <sunhao.th@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CACkBjsax51i4mu6C0C3vJqQN3NR_iVuucoeG3U1HXjrgzn5FFQ@mail.gmail.com/
Fixes: 79bd37120b1495 ("btrfs: rework chunk allocation to avoid exhaustion of the system chunk array")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.14+
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
show more ...
|
| #
66182050 |
| 12-Oct-2021 |
Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> |
btrfs: add additional parameters to btrfs_init_tree_ref/btrfs_init_data_ref
[ Upstream commit f42c5da6c12e990d8ec415199600b4d593c63bf5 ]
In order to make 'real_root' used only in ref-verify it's re
btrfs: add additional parameters to btrfs_init_tree_ref/btrfs_init_data_ref
[ Upstream commit f42c5da6c12e990d8ec415199600b4d593c63bf5 ]
In order to make 'real_root' used only in ref-verify it's required to
have the necessary context to perform the same checks that this member
is used for. So add 'mod_root' which will contain the root on behalf of
which a delayed ref was created and a 'skip_group' parameter which
will contain callsite-specific override of skip_qgroup.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
show more ...
|
| #
70fc07e3 |
| 13-Oct-2021 |
Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> |
btrfs: fix deadlock between chunk allocation and chunk btree modifications
[ Upstream commit 2bb2e00ed9787e52580bb651264b8d6a2b7a9dd2 ]
When a task is doing some modification to the chunk btree and
btrfs: fix deadlock between chunk allocation and chunk btree modifications
[ Upstream commit 2bb2e00ed9787e52580bb651264b8d6a2b7a9dd2 ]
When a task is doing some modification to the chunk btree and it is not in
the context of a chunk allocation or a chunk removal, it can deadlock with
another task that is currently allocating a new data or metadata chunk.
These contexts are the following:
* When relocating a system chunk, when we need to COW the extent buffers
that belong to the chunk btree;
* When adding a new device (ioctl), where we need to add a new device item
to the chunk btree;
* When removing a device (ioctl), where we need to remove a device item
from the chunk btree;
* When resizing a device (ioctl), where we need to update a device item in
the chunk btree and may need to relocate a system chunk that lies beyond
the new device size when shrinking a device.
The problem happens due to a sequence of steps like the following:
1) Task A starts a data or metadata chunk allocation and it locks the
chunk mutex;
2) Task B is relocating a system chunk, and when it needs to COW an extent
buffer of the chunk btree, it has locked both that extent buffer as
well as its parent extent buffer;
3) Since there is not enough available system space, either because none
of the existing system block groups have enough free space or because
the only one with enough free space is in RO mode due to the relocation,
task B triggers a new system chunk allocation. It blocks when trying to
acquire the chunk mutex, currently held by task A;
4) Task A enters btrfs_chunk_alloc_add_chunk_item(), in order to insert
the new chunk item into the chunk btree and update the existing device
items there. But in order to do that, it has to lock the extent buffer
that task B locked at step 2, or its parent extent buffer, but task B
is waiting on the chunk mutex, which is currently locked by task A,
therefore resulting in a deadlock.
One example report when the deadlock happens with system chunk relocation:
INFO: task kworker/u9:5:546 blocked for more than 143 seconds.
Not tainted 5.15.0-rc3+ #1
"echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
task:kworker/u9:5 state:D stack:25936 pid: 546 ppid: 2 flags:0x00004000
Workqueue: events_unbound btrfs_async_reclaim_metadata_space
Call Trace:
context_switch kernel/sched/core.c:4940 [inline]
__schedule+0xcd9/0x2530 kernel/sched/core.c:6287
schedule+0xd3/0x270 kernel/sched/core.c:6366
rwsem_down_read_slowpath+0x4ee/0x9d0 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:993
__down_read_common kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1214 [inline]
__down_read kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1223 [inline]
down_read_nested+0xe6/0x440 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1590
__btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x31/0x350 fs/btrfs/locking.c:47
btrfs_tree_read_lock fs/btrfs/locking.c:54 [inline]
btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x8a/0x320 fs/btrfs/locking.c:191
btrfs_search_slot_get_root fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1623 [inline]
btrfs_search_slot+0x13b4/0x2140 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1728
btrfs_update_device+0x11f/0x500 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:2794
btrfs_chunk_alloc_add_chunk_item+0x34d/0xea0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:5504
do_chunk_alloc fs/btrfs/block-group.c:3408 [inline]
btrfs_chunk_alloc+0x84d/0xf50 fs/btrfs/block-group.c:3653
flush_space+0x54e/0xd80 fs/btrfs/space-info.c:670
btrfs_async_reclaim_metadata_space+0x396/0xa90 fs/btrfs/space-info.c:953
process_one_work+0x9df/0x16d0 kernel/workqueue.c:2297
worker_thread+0x90/0xed0 kernel/workqueue.c:2444
kthread+0x3e5/0x4d0 kernel/kthread.c:319
ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:295
INFO: task syz-executor:9107 blocked for more than 143 seconds.
Not tainted 5.15.0-rc3+ #1
"echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
task:syz-executor state:D stack:23200 pid: 9107 ppid: 7792 flags:0x00004004
Call Trace:
context_switch kernel/sched/core.c:4940 [inline]
__schedule+0xcd9/0x2530 kernel/sched/core.c:6287
schedule+0xd3/0x270 kernel/sched/core.c:6366
schedule_preempt_disabled+0xf/0x20 kernel/sched/core.c:6425
__mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:669 [inline]
__mutex_lock+0xc96/0x1680 kernel/locking/mutex.c:729
btrfs_chunk_alloc+0x31a/0xf50 fs/btrfs/block-group.c:3631
find_free_extent_update_loop fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:3986 [inline]
find_free_extent+0x25cb/0x3a30 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4335
btrfs_reserve_extent+0x1f1/0x500 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4415
btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0x203/0x1120 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4813
__btrfs_cow_block+0x412/0x1620 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:415
btrfs_cow_block+0x2f6/0x8c0 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:570
btrfs_search_slot+0x1094/0x2140 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1768
relocate_tree_block fs/btrfs/relocation.c:2694 [inline]
relocate_tree_blocks+0xf73/0x1770 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:2757
relocate_block_group+0x47e/0xc70 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:3673
btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x48a/0xc60 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:4070
btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x96/0x280 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:3181
__btrfs_balance fs/btrfs/volumes.c:3911 [inline]
btrfs_balance+0x1f03/0x3cd0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4301
btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x61e/0x800 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:4137
btrfs_ioctl+0x39ea/0x7b70 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:4949
vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]
__do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:874 [inline]
__se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:860 [inline]
__x64_sys_ioctl+0x193/0x200 fs/ioctl.c:860
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
So fix this by making sure that whenever we try to modify the chunk btree
and we are neither in a chunk allocation context nor in a chunk remove
context, we reserve system space before modifying the chunk btree.
Reported-by: Hao Sun <sunhao.th@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CACkBjsax51i4mu6C0C3vJqQN3NR_iVuucoeG3U1HXjrgzn5FFQ@mail.gmail.com/
Fixes: 79bd37120b1495 ("btrfs: rework chunk allocation to avoid exhaustion of the system chunk array")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.14+
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
show more ...
|