Revision tags: v6.6.25, v6.6.24, v6.6.23, v6.6.16, v6.6.15, v6.6.14, v6.6.13, v6.6.12, v6.6.11, v6.6.10, v6.6.9, v6.6.8, v6.6.7, v6.6.6, v6.6.5, v6.6.4, v6.6.3, v6.6.2, v6.5.11, v6.6.1, v6.5.10, v6.6, v6.5.9, v6.5.8, v6.5.7, v6.5.6, v6.5.5, v6.5.4, v6.5.3 |
|
#
d5e09e38 |
| 12-Sep-2023 |
Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> |
btrfs: abort transaction on generation mismatch when marking eb as dirty
[ Upstream commit 50564b651d01c19ce732819c5b3c3fd60707188e ]
When marking an extent buffer as dirty, at btrfs_mark_buffer_di
btrfs: abort transaction on generation mismatch when marking eb as dirty
[ Upstream commit 50564b651d01c19ce732819c5b3c3fd60707188e ]
When marking an extent buffer as dirty, at btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty(), we check if its generation matches the running transaction and if not we just print a warning. Such mismatch is an indicator that something really went wrong and only printing a warning message (and stack trace) is not enough to prevent a corruption. Allowing a transaction to commit with such an extent buffer will trigger an error if we ever try to read it from disk due to a generation mismatch with its parent generation.
So abort the current transaction with -EUCLEAN if we notice a generation mismatch. For this we need to pass a transaction handle to btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty() which is always available except in test code, in which case we can pass NULL since it operates on dummy extent buffers and all test roots have a single node/leaf (root node at level 0).
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
show more ...
|
Revision tags: v6.5.2, v6.1.51, v6.5.1, v6.1.50, v6.5, v6.1.49, v6.1.48, v6.1.46, v6.1.45, v6.1.44, v6.1.43, v6.1.42, v6.1.41, v6.1.40, v6.1.39, v6.1.38, v6.1.37 |
|
#
3b9f0995 |
| 30-Jun-2023 |
Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> |
btrfs: rename add_new_free_space() to btrfs_add_new_free_space()
Since add_new_free_space() is exported, used outside block-group.c, rename it to include the 'btrfs_' prefix.
Signed-off-by: Filipe
btrfs: rename add_new_free_space() to btrfs_add_new_free_space()
Since add_new_free_space() is exported, used outside block-group.c, rename it to include the 'btrfs_' prefix.
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
show more ...
|
#
d8ccbd21 |
| 30-Jun-2023 |
Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> |
btrfs: remove BUG_ON()'s in add_new_free_space()
At add_new_free_space() we have these BUG_ON()'s that are there to deal with any failure to add free space to the in memory free space cache. Such fa
btrfs: remove BUG_ON()'s in add_new_free_space()
At add_new_free_space() we have these BUG_ON()'s that are there to deal with any failure to add free space to the in memory free space cache. Such failures are mostly -ENOMEM that should be very rare. However there's no need to have these BUG_ON()'s, we can just return any error to the caller and all callers and their upper call chain are already dealing with errors.
So just make add_new_free_space() return any errors, while removing the BUG_ON()'s, and returning the total amount of added free space to an optional u64 pointer argument.
Reported-by: syzbot+3ba856e07b7127889d8c@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/000000000000e9cb8305ff4e8327@google.com/ Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
show more ...
|
Revision tags: v6.1.36, v6.4, v6.1.35 |
|
#
babebf02 |
| 19-Jun-2023 |
Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> |
btrfs: fix race when deleting free space root from the dirty cow roots list
When deleting the free space tree we are deleting the free space root from the list fs_info->dirty_cowonly_roots without t
btrfs: fix race when deleting free space root from the dirty cow roots list
When deleting the free space tree we are deleting the free space root from the list fs_info->dirty_cowonly_roots without taking the lock that protects it, which is struct btrfs_fs_info::trans_lock. This unsynchronized list manipulation may cause chaos if there's another concurrent manipulation of this list, such as when adding a root to it with ctree.c:add_root_to_dirty_list().
This can result in all sorts of weird failures caused by a race, such as the following crash:
[337571.278245] general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdead000000000108: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI [337571.278933] CPU: 1 PID: 115447 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G W 6.4.0-rc6-btrfs-next-134+ #1 [337571.279153] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [337571.279572] RIP: 0010:commit_cowonly_roots+0x11f/0x250 [btrfs] [337571.279928] Code: 85 38 06 00 (...) [337571.280363] RSP: 0018:ffff9f63446efba0 EFLAGS: 00010206 [337571.280582] RAX: ffff942d98ec2638 RBX: ffff9430b82b4c30 RCX: 0000000449e1c000 [337571.280798] RDX: dead000000000100 RSI: ffff9430021e4900 RDI: 0000000000036070 [337571.281015] RBP: ffff942d98ec2000 R08: ffff942d98ec2000 R09: 000000000000015b [337571.281254] R10: 0000000000000009 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff942fe8fbf600 [337571.281476] R13: ffff942dabe23040 R14: ffff942dabe20800 R15: ffff942d92cf3b48 [337571.281723] FS: 00007f478adb7340(0000) GS:ffff94349fa40000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [337571.281950] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [337571.282184] CR2: 00007f478ab9a3d5 CR3: 000000001e02c001 CR4: 0000000000370ee0 [337571.282416] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [337571.282647] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [337571.282874] Call Trace: [337571.283101] <TASK> [337571.283327] ? __die_body+0x1b/0x60 [337571.283570] ? die_addr+0x39/0x60 [337571.283796] ? exc_general_protection+0x22e/0x430 [337571.284022] ? asm_exc_general_protection+0x22/0x30 [337571.284251] ? commit_cowonly_roots+0x11f/0x250 [btrfs] [337571.284531] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x42e/0xf90 [btrfs] [337571.284803] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x15/0x30 [337571.285031] ? release_extent_buffer+0x103/0x130 [btrfs] [337571.285305] reset_balance_state+0x152/0x1b0 [btrfs] [337571.285578] btrfs_balance+0xa50/0x11e0 [btrfs] [337571.285864] ? __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x14a/0x410 [337571.286086] btrfs_ioctl+0x249a/0x3320 [btrfs] [337571.286358] ? mod_objcg_state+0xd2/0x360 [337571.286577] ? refill_obj_stock+0xb0/0x160 [337571.286798] ? seq_release+0x25/0x30 [337571.287016] ? __rseq_handle_notify_resume+0x3ba/0x4b0 [337571.287235] ? percpu_counter_add_batch+0x2e/0xa0 [337571.287455] ? __x64_sys_ioctl+0x88/0xc0 [337571.287675] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x88/0xc0 [337571.287901] do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90 [337571.288126] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x72/0xdc [337571.288352] RIP: 0033:0x7f478aaffe9b
So fix this by locking struct btrfs_fs_info::trans_lock before deleting the free space root from that list.
Fixes: a5ed91828518 ("Btrfs: implement the free space B-tree") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+ Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
show more ...
|
Revision tags: v6.1.34, v6.1.33, v6.1.32, v6.1.31, v6.1.30, v6.1.29, v6.1.28, v6.1.27 |
|
#
1d6a4fc8 |
| 28-Apr-2023 |
Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> |
btrfs: make clear_cache mount option to rebuild FST without disabling it
Previously clear_cache mount option would simply disable free-space-tree feature temporarily then re-enable it to rebuild the
btrfs: make clear_cache mount option to rebuild FST without disabling it
Previously clear_cache mount option would simply disable free-space-tree feature temporarily then re-enable it to rebuild the whole free space tree.
But this is problematic for block-group-tree feature, as we have an artificial dependency on free-space-tree feature.
If we go the existing method, after clearing the free-space-tree feature, we would flip the filesystem to read-only mode, as we detect a super block write with block-group-tree but no free-space-tree feature.
This patch would change the behavior by properly rebuilding the free space tree without disabling this feature, thus allowing clear_cache mount option to work with block group tree.
Now we can mount a filesystem with block-group-tree feature and clear_mount option:
$ mkfs.btrfs -O block-group-tree /dev/test/scratch1 -f $ sudo mount /dev/test/scratch1 /mnt/btrfs -o clear_cache $ sudo dmesg -t | head -n 5 BTRFS info (device dm-1): force clearing of disk cache BTRFS info (device dm-1): using free space tree BTRFS info (device dm-1): auto enabling async discard BTRFS info (device dm-1): rebuilding free space tree BTRFS info (device dm-1): checking UUID tree
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+ Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
show more ...
|
Revision tags: v6.1.26, v6.3, v6.1.25, v6.1.24, v6.1.23, v6.1.22, v6.1.21, v6.1.20, v6.1.19, v6.1.18, v6.1.17, v6.1.16, v6.1.15, v6.1.14, v6.1.13, v6.2, v6.1.12, v6.1.11, v6.1.10, v6.1.9 |
|
#
190a8339 |
| 26-Jan-2023 |
Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> |
btrfs: rename btrfs_clean_tree_block to btrfs_clear_buffer_dirty
btrfs_clean_tree_block is a misnomer, it's just clear_extent_buffer_dirty with some extra accounting around it. Rename this to btrfs
btrfs: rename btrfs_clean_tree_block to btrfs_clear_buffer_dirty
btrfs_clean_tree_block is a misnomer, it's just clear_extent_buffer_dirty with some extra accounting around it. Rename this to btrfs_clear_buffer_dirty to make it more clear it belongs with it's setter, btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
show more ...
|
#
ed25dab3 |
| 26-Jan-2023 |
Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> |
btrfs: add trans argument to btrfs_clean_tree_block
We check the header generation in the extent buffer against the current running transaction id to see if it's safe to clear DIRTY on this buffer.
btrfs: add trans argument to btrfs_clean_tree_block
We check the header generation in the extent buffer against the current running transaction id to see if it's safe to clear DIRTY on this buffer. Generally speaking if we're clearing the buffer dirty we're holding the transaction open, but in the case of cleaning up an aborted transaction we don't, so we have extra checks in that path to check the transid. To allow for a future cleanup go ahead and pass in the trans handle so we don't have to rely on ->running_transaction being set.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
show more ...
|
Revision tags: v6.1.8, v6.1.7, v6.1.6, v6.1.5, v6.0.19, v6.0.18, v6.1.4, v6.1.3, v6.0.17, v6.1.2, v6.0.16, v6.1.1, v6.0.15, v6.0.14, v6.0.13, v6.1, v6.0.12, v6.0.11, v6.0.10, v5.15.80, v6.0.9, v5.15.79, v6.0.8, v5.15.78, v6.0.7, v5.15.77 |
|
#
0d7764ff |
| 31-Oct-2022 |
David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> |
btrfs: convert btrfs_block_group::needs_free_space to runtime flag
We already have flags in block group to track various status bits, convert needs_free_space as well and reduce size of btrfs_block_
btrfs: convert btrfs_block_group::needs_free_space to runtime flag
We already have flags in block group to track various status bits, convert needs_free_space as well and reduce size of btrfs_block_group.
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
show more ...
|
Revision tags: v5.15.76, v6.0.6, v6.0.5, v5.15.75, v6.0.4 |
|
#
45c40c8f |
| 24-Oct-2022 |
Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> |
btrfs: move root tree prototypes to their own header
Move all the root-tree.c prototypes to root-tree.h, and then update all the necessary files to include the new header.
Signed-off-by: Josef Baci
btrfs: move root tree prototypes to their own header
Move all the root-tree.c prototypes to root-tree.h, and then update all the necessary files to include the new header.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
show more ...
|
#
a0231804 |
| 24-Oct-2022 |
Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> |
btrfs: move extent-tree helpers into their own header file
Move all the extent tree related prototypes to extent-tree.h out of ctree.h, and then go include it everywhere needed so everything compile
btrfs: move extent-tree helpers into their own header file
Move all the extent tree related prototypes to extent-tree.h out of ctree.h, and then go include it everywhere needed so everything compiles.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
show more ...
|
Revision tags: v6.0.3 |
|
#
07e81dc9 |
| 19-Oct-2022 |
Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> |
btrfs: move accessor helpers into accessors.h
This is a large patch, but because they're all macros it's impossible to split up. Simply copy all of the item accessors in ctree.h and paste them in a
btrfs: move accessor helpers into accessors.h
This is a large patch, but because they're all macros it's impossible to split up. Simply copy all of the item accessors in ctree.h and paste them in accessors.h, and then update any files to include the header so everything compiles.
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> [ reformat comments, style fixups ] Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
show more ...
|
#
9b569ea0 |
| 19-Oct-2022 |
Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> |
btrfs: move the printk helpers out of ctree.h
We have a bunch of printk helpers that are in ctree.h. These have nothing to do with ctree.c, so move them into their own header. Subsequent patches wi
btrfs: move the printk helpers out of ctree.h
We have a bunch of printk helpers that are in ctree.h. These have nothing to do with ctree.c, so move them into their own header. Subsequent patches will cleanup the printk helpers.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
show more ...
|
#
c7f13d42 |
| 19-Oct-2022 |
Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> |
btrfs: move fs wide helpers out of ctree.h
We have several fs wide related helpers in ctree.h. The bulk of these are the incompat flag test helpers, but there are things such as btrfs_fs_closing()
btrfs: move fs wide helpers out of ctree.h
We have several fs wide related helpers in ctree.h. The bulk of these are the incompat flag test helpers, but there are things such as btrfs_fs_closing() and the read only helpers that also aren't directly related to the ctree code. Move these into a fs.h header, which will serve as the location for file system wide related helpers.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
show more ...
|
Revision tags: v6.0.2, v5.15.74, v5.15.73, v6.0.1, v5.15.72, v6.0, v5.15.71, v5.15.70, v5.15.69, v5.15.68, v5.15.67, v5.15.66, v5.15.65, v5.15.64, v5.15.63, v5.15.62, v5.15.61 |
|
#
48ff7083 |
| 16-Aug-2022 |
Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com> |
btrfs: get rid of block group caching progress logic
struct btrfs_caching_ctl::progress and struct btrfs_block_group::last_byte_to_unpin were previously needed to ensure that unpin_extent_range() di
btrfs: get rid of block group caching progress logic
struct btrfs_caching_ctl::progress and struct btrfs_block_group::last_byte_to_unpin were previously needed to ensure that unpin_extent_range() didn't return a range to the free space cache before the caching thread had a chance to cache that range. However, the commit "btrfs: fix space cache corruption and potential double allocations" made it so that we always synchronously cache the block group at the time that we pin the extent, so this machinery is no longer necessary.
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
show more ...
|
Revision tags: v5.15.60, v5.15.59, v5.19, v5.15.58, v5.15.57, v5.15.56, v5.15.55, v5.15.54, v5.15.53, v5.15.52, v5.15.51, v5.15.50, v5.15.49, v5.15.48, v5.15.47, v5.15.46, v5.15.45, v5.15.44, v5.15.43, v5.15.42, v5.18, v5.15.41, v5.15.40, v5.15.39, v5.15.38, v5.15.37, v5.15.36, v5.15.35, v5.15.34 |
|
#
08dddb29 |
| 13-Apr-2022 |
Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> |
btrfs: use rbtree with leftmost node cached for tracking lowest block group
We keep track of the start offset of the block group with the lowest start offset at fs_info->first_logical_byte. This req
btrfs: use rbtree with leftmost node cached for tracking lowest block group
We keep track of the start offset of the block group with the lowest start offset at fs_info->first_logical_byte. This requires explicitly updating that field every time we add, delete or lookup a block group to/from the red black tree at fs_info->block_group_cache_tree.
Since the block group with the lowest start address happens to always be the one that is the leftmost node of the tree, we can use a red black tree that caches the left most node. Then when we need the start address of that block group, we can just quickly get the leftmost node in the tree and extract the start offset of that node's block group. This avoids the need to explicitly keep track of that address in the dedicated member fs_info->first_logical_byte, and it also allows the next patch in the series to switch the lock that protects the red black tree from a spin lock to a read/write lock - without this change it would be tricky because block group searches also update fs_info->first_logical_byte.
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
show more ...
|
Revision tags: v5.15.33, v5.15.32, v5.15.31, v5.17, v5.15.30, v5.15.29, v5.15.28, v5.15.27, v5.15.26, v5.15.25, v5.15.24, v5.15.23, v5.15.22, v5.15.21, v5.15.20, v5.15.19, v5.15.18, v5.15.17, v5.4.173, v5.15.16, v5.15.15, v5.16, v5.15.10, v5.15.9 |
|
#
f7238e50 |
| 15-Dec-2021 |
Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> |
btrfs: add support for multiple global roots
With extent tree v2 you will be able to create multiple csum, extent, and free space trees. They will be used based on the block group, which will now u
btrfs: add support for multiple global roots
With extent tree v2 you will be able to create multiple csum, extent, and free space trees. They will be used based on the block group, which will now use the block_group_item->chunk_objectid to point to the set of global roots that it will use. When allocating new block groups we'll simply mod the gigabyte offset of the block group against the number of global roots we have and that will be the block groups global id.
>From there we can take the bytenr that we're modifying in the respective tree, look up the block group and get that block groups corresponding global root id. From there we can get to the appropriate global root for that bytenr.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
show more ...
|
Revision tags: v5.15.8, v5.15.7, v5.15.6, v5.15.5, v5.15.4, v5.15.3, v5.15.2, v5.15.1 |
|
#
abed4aaa |
| 05-Nov-2021 |
Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> |
btrfs: track the csum, extent, and free space trees in a rb tree
In the future we are going to have multiple copies of these trees. To facilitate this we need a way to lookup the different roots we
btrfs: track the csum, extent, and free space trees in a rb tree
In the future we are going to have multiple copies of these trees. To facilitate this we need a way to lookup the different roots we are looking for. Handle this by adding a global root rb tree that is indexed on the root->root_key. Then instead of loading the roots at mount time with individually targeted keys, simply search the tree_root for anything with the specific objectid we want. This will make it straightforward to support both old style and new style file systems.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
show more ...
|
#
7939dd9f |
| 05-Nov-2021 |
Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> |
btrfs: stop accessing ->free_space_root directly
We're going to have multiple free space roots in the future, so adjust all the users of the free space root to use a helper to access the root.
Sign
btrfs: stop accessing ->free_space_root directly
We're going to have multiple free space roots in the future, so adjust all the users of the free space root to use a helper to access the root.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
show more ...
|
#
29cbcf40 |
| 05-Nov-2021 |
Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> |
btrfs: stop accessing ->extent_root directly
When we start having multiple extent roots we'll need to use a helper to get to the correct extent_root. Rename fs_info->extent_root to _extent_root and
btrfs: stop accessing ->extent_root directly
When we start having multiple extent roots we'll need to use a helper to get to the correct extent_root. Rename fs_info->extent_root to _extent_root and convert all of the users of the extent root to using the btrfs_extent_root() helper. This will allow us to easily clean up the remaining direct accesses in the future.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
show more ...
|
#
7a163608 |
| 13-Dec-2021 |
Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> |
btrfs: fix invalid delayed ref after subvolume creation failure
When creating a subvolume, at ioctl.c:create_subvol(), if we fail to insert the new root's root item into the root tree, we are freein
btrfs: fix invalid delayed ref after subvolume creation failure
When creating a subvolume, at ioctl.c:create_subvol(), if we fail to insert the new root's root item into the root tree, we are freeing the metadata extent we reserved for the new root to prevent a metadata extent leak, as we don't abort the transaction at that point (since there is nothing at that point that is irreversible).
However we allocated the metadata extent for the new root which we are creating for the new subvolume, so its delayed reference refers to the ID of this new root. But when we free the metadata extent we pass the root of the subvolume where the new subvolume is located to btrfs_free_tree_block() - this is incorrect because this will generate a delayed reference that refers to the ID of the parent subvolume's root, and not to ID of the new root.
This results in a failure when running delayed references that leads to a transaction abort and a trace like the following:
[3868.738042] RIP: 0010:__btrfs_free_extent+0x709/0x950 [btrfs] [3868.739857] Code: 68 0f 85 e6 fb ff (...) [3868.742963] RSP: 0018:ffffb0e9045cf910 EFLAGS: 00010246 [3868.743908] RAX: 00000000fffffffe RBX: 00000000fffffffe RCX: 0000000000000002 [3868.745312] RDX: 00000000fffffffe RSI: 0000000000000002 RDI: ffff90b0cd793b88 [3868.746643] RBP: 000000000e5d8000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffff90b0cd793b88 [3868.747979] R10: 0000000000000002 R11: 00014ded97944d68 R12: 0000000000000000 [3868.749373] R13: ffff90b09afe4a28 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff90b0cd793b88 [3868.750725] FS: 00007f281c4a8b80(0000) GS:ffff90b3ada00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [3868.752275] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [3868.753515] CR2: 00007f281c6a5000 CR3: 0000000108a42006 CR4: 0000000000370ee0 [3868.754869] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [3868.756228] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [3868.757803] Call Trace: [3868.758281] <TASK> [3868.758655] ? btrfs_merge_delayed_refs+0x178/0x1c0 [btrfs] [3868.759827] __btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0x2b1/0x1250 [btrfs] [3868.761047] btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0x86/0x210 [btrfs] [3868.762069] ? lock_acquired+0x19f/0x420 [3868.762829] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x69/0xb20 [btrfs] [3868.763860] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x29/0x40 [3868.764614] ? btrfs_block_rsv_release+0x1c2/0x1e0 [btrfs] [3868.765870] create_subvol+0x1d8/0x9a0 [btrfs] [3868.766766] btrfs_mksubvol+0x447/0x4c0 [btrfs] [3868.767669] ? preempt_count_add+0x49/0xa0 [3868.768444] __btrfs_ioctl_snap_create+0x123/0x190 [btrfs] [3868.769639] ? _copy_from_user+0x66/0xa0 [3868.770391] btrfs_ioctl_snap_create_v2+0xbb/0x140 [btrfs] [3868.771495] btrfs_ioctl+0xd1e/0x35c0 [btrfs] [3868.772364] ? __slab_free+0x10a/0x360 [3868.773198] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x12/0x60 [3868.774121] ? lock_release+0x223/0x4a0 [3868.774863] ? lock_acquired+0x19f/0x420 [3868.775634] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x12/0x60 [3868.776530] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0x1b/0xe0 [3868.777373] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3e/0x60 [3868.778280] ? kmem_cache_free+0x321/0x3c0 [3868.779011] ? __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0 [3868.779718] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0 [3868.780387] do_syscall_64+0x3b/0xc0 [3868.781059] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae [3868.781953] RIP: 0033:0x7f281c59e957 [3868.782585] Code: 3c 1c 48 f7 d8 4c (...) [3868.785867] RSP: 002b:00007ffe1f83e2b8 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010 [3868.787198] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 00007f281c59e957 [3868.788450] RDX: 00007ffe1f83e2c0 RSI: 0000000050009418 RDI: 0000000000000003 [3868.789748] RBP: 00007ffe1f83f300 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 00007ffe1f83fe36 [3868.791214] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 0000000000000003 [3868.792468] R13: 0000000000000003 R14: 00007ffe1f83e2c0 R15: 00000000000003cc [3868.793765] </TASK> [3868.794037] irq event stamp: 0 [3868.794548] hardirqs last enabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0 [3868.795670] hardirqs last disabled at (0): [<ffffffff98294214>] copy_process+0x934/0x2040 [3868.797086] softirqs last enabled at (0): [<ffffffff98294214>] copy_process+0x934/0x2040 [3868.798309] softirqs last disabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0 [3868.799284] ---[ end trace be24c7002fe27747 ]--- [3868.799928] BTRFS info (device dm-0): leaf 241188864 gen 1268 total ptrs 214 free space 469 owner 2 [3868.801133] BTRFS info (device dm-0): refs 2 lock_owner 225627 current 225627 [3868.802056] item 0 key (237436928 169 0) itemoff 16250 itemsize 33 [3868.802863] extent refs 1 gen 1265 flags 2 [3868.803447] ref#0: tree block backref root 1610 (...) [3869.064354] item 114 key (241008640 169 0) itemoff 12488 itemsize 33 [3869.065421] extent refs 1 gen 1268 flags 2 [3869.066115] ref#0: tree block backref root 1689 (...) [3869.403834] BTRFS error (device dm-0): unable to find ref byte nr 241008640 parent 0 root 1622 owner 0 offset 0 [3869.405641] BTRFS: error (device dm-0) in __btrfs_free_extent:3076: errno=-2 No such entry [3869.407138] BTRFS: error (device dm-0) in btrfs_run_delayed_refs:2159: errno=-2 No such entry
Fix this by passing the new subvolume's root ID to btrfs_free_tree_block(). This requires changing the root argument of btrfs_free_tree_block() from struct btrfs_root * to a u64, since at this point during the subvolume creation we have not yet created the struct btrfs_root for the new subvolume, and btrfs_free_tree_block() only needs a root ID and nothing else from a struct btrfs_root.
This was triggered by test case generic/475 from fstests.
Fixes: 67addf29004c5b ("btrfs: fix metadata extent leak after failure to create subvolume") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
show more ...
|
#
9bc53f5a |
| 13-Dec-2021 |
Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> |
btrfs: fix invalid delayed ref after subvolume creation failure
[ Upstream commit 7a1636089acfee7562fe79aff7d1b4c57869896d ]
When creating a subvolume, at ioctl.c:create_subvol(), if we fail to ins
btrfs: fix invalid delayed ref after subvolume creation failure
[ Upstream commit 7a1636089acfee7562fe79aff7d1b4c57869896d ]
When creating a subvolume, at ioctl.c:create_subvol(), if we fail to insert the new root's root item into the root tree, we are freeing the metadata extent we reserved for the new root to prevent a metadata extent leak, as we don't abort the transaction at that point (since there is nothing at that point that is irreversible).
However we allocated the metadata extent for the new root which we are creating for the new subvolume, so its delayed reference refers to the ID of this new root. But when we free the metadata extent we pass the root of the subvolume where the new subvolume is located to btrfs_free_tree_block() - this is incorrect because this will generate a delayed reference that refers to the ID of the parent subvolume's root, and not to ID of the new root.
This results in a failure when running delayed references that leads to a transaction abort and a trace like the following:
[3868.738042] RIP: 0010:__btrfs_free_extent+0x709/0x950 [btrfs] [3868.739857] Code: 68 0f 85 e6 fb ff (...) [3868.742963] RSP: 0018:ffffb0e9045cf910 EFLAGS: 00010246 [3868.743908] RAX: 00000000fffffffe RBX: 00000000fffffffe RCX: 0000000000000002 [3868.745312] RDX: 00000000fffffffe RSI: 0000000000000002 RDI: ffff90b0cd793b88 [3868.746643] RBP: 000000000e5d8000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffff90b0cd793b88 [3868.747979] R10: 0000000000000002 R11: 00014ded97944d68 R12: 0000000000000000 [3868.749373] R13: ffff90b09afe4a28 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff90b0cd793b88 [3868.750725] FS: 00007f281c4a8b80(0000) GS:ffff90b3ada00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [3868.752275] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [3868.753515] CR2: 00007f281c6a5000 CR3: 0000000108a42006 CR4: 0000000000370ee0 [3868.754869] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [3868.756228] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [3868.757803] Call Trace: [3868.758281] <TASK> [3868.758655] ? btrfs_merge_delayed_refs+0x178/0x1c0 [btrfs] [3868.759827] __btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0x2b1/0x1250 [btrfs] [3868.761047] btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0x86/0x210 [btrfs] [3868.762069] ? lock_acquired+0x19f/0x420 [3868.762829] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x69/0xb20 [btrfs] [3868.763860] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x29/0x40 [3868.764614] ? btrfs_block_rsv_release+0x1c2/0x1e0 [btrfs] [3868.765870] create_subvol+0x1d8/0x9a0 [btrfs] [3868.766766] btrfs_mksubvol+0x447/0x4c0 [btrfs] [3868.767669] ? preempt_count_add+0x49/0xa0 [3868.768444] __btrfs_ioctl_snap_create+0x123/0x190 [btrfs] [3868.769639] ? _copy_from_user+0x66/0xa0 [3868.770391] btrfs_ioctl_snap_create_v2+0xbb/0x140 [btrfs] [3868.771495] btrfs_ioctl+0xd1e/0x35c0 [btrfs] [3868.772364] ? __slab_free+0x10a/0x360 [3868.773198] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x12/0x60 [3868.774121] ? lock_release+0x223/0x4a0 [3868.774863] ? lock_acquired+0x19f/0x420 [3868.775634] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x12/0x60 [3868.776530] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0x1b/0xe0 [3868.777373] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3e/0x60 [3868.778280] ? kmem_cache_free+0x321/0x3c0 [3868.779011] ? __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0 [3868.779718] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0 [3868.780387] do_syscall_64+0x3b/0xc0 [3868.781059] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae [3868.781953] RIP: 0033:0x7f281c59e957 [3868.782585] Code: 3c 1c 48 f7 d8 4c (...) [3868.785867] RSP: 002b:00007ffe1f83e2b8 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010 [3868.787198] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 00007f281c59e957 [3868.788450] RDX: 00007ffe1f83e2c0 RSI: 0000000050009418 RDI: 0000000000000003 [3868.789748] RBP: 00007ffe1f83f300 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 00007ffe1f83fe36 [3868.791214] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 0000000000000003 [3868.792468] R13: 0000000000000003 R14: 00007ffe1f83e2c0 R15: 00000000000003cc [3868.793765] </TASK> [3868.794037] irq event stamp: 0 [3868.794548] hardirqs last enabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0 [3868.795670] hardirqs last disabled at (0): [<ffffffff98294214>] copy_process+0x934/0x2040 [3868.797086] softirqs last enabled at (0): [<ffffffff98294214>] copy_process+0x934/0x2040 [3868.798309] softirqs last disabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0 [3868.799284] ---[ end trace be24c7002fe27747 ]--- [3868.799928] BTRFS info (device dm-0): leaf 241188864 gen 1268 total ptrs 214 free space 469 owner 2 [3868.801133] BTRFS info (device dm-0): refs 2 lock_owner 225627 current 225627 [3868.802056] item 0 key (237436928 169 0) itemoff 16250 itemsize 33 [3868.802863] extent refs 1 gen 1265 flags 2 [3868.803447] ref#0: tree block backref root 1610 (...) [3869.064354] item 114 key (241008640 169 0) itemoff 12488 itemsize 33 [3869.065421] extent refs 1 gen 1268 flags 2 [3869.066115] ref#0: tree block backref root 1689 (...) [3869.403834] BTRFS error (device dm-0): unable to find ref byte nr 241008640 parent 0 root 1622 owner 0 offset 0 [3869.405641] BTRFS: error (device dm-0) in __btrfs_free_extent:3076: errno=-2 No such entry [3869.407138] BTRFS: error (device dm-0) in btrfs_run_delayed_refs:2159: errno=-2 No such entry
Fix this by passing the new subvolume's root ID to btrfs_free_tree_block(). This requires changing the root argument of btrfs_free_tree_block() from struct btrfs_root * to a u64, since at this point during the subvolume creation we have not yet created the struct btrfs_root for the new subvolume, and btrfs_free_tree_block() only needs a root ID and nothing else from a struct btrfs_root.
This was triggered by test case generic/475 from fstests.
Fixes: 67addf29004c5b ("btrfs: fix metadata extent leak after failure to create subvolume") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
show more ...
|
#
9bc53f5a |
| 13-Dec-2021 |
Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> |
btrfs: fix invalid delayed ref after subvolume creation failure
[ Upstream commit 7a1636089acfee7562fe79aff7d1b4c57869896d ]
When creating a subvolume, at ioctl.c:create_subvol(), if we fail to ins
btrfs: fix invalid delayed ref after subvolume creation failure
[ Upstream commit 7a1636089acfee7562fe79aff7d1b4c57869896d ]
When creating a subvolume, at ioctl.c:create_subvol(), if we fail to insert the new root's root item into the root tree, we are freeing the metadata extent we reserved for the new root to prevent a metadata extent leak, as we don't abort the transaction at that point (since there is nothing at that point that is irreversible).
However we allocated the metadata extent for the new root which we are creating for the new subvolume, so its delayed reference refers to the ID of this new root. But when we free the metadata extent we pass the root of the subvolume where the new subvolume is located to btrfs_free_tree_block() - this is incorrect because this will generate a delayed reference that refers to the ID of the parent subvolume's root, and not to ID of the new root.
This results in a failure when running delayed references that leads to a transaction abort and a trace like the following:
[3868.738042] RIP: 0010:__btrfs_free_extent+0x709/0x950 [btrfs] [3868.739857] Code: 68 0f 85 e6 fb ff (...) [3868.742963] RSP: 0018:ffffb0e9045cf910 EFLAGS: 00010246 [3868.743908] RAX: 00000000fffffffe RBX: 00000000fffffffe RCX: 0000000000000002 [3868.745312] RDX: 00000000fffffffe RSI: 0000000000000002 RDI: ffff90b0cd793b88 [3868.746643] RBP: 000000000e5d8000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffff90b0cd793b88 [3868.747979] R10: 0000000000000002 R11: 00014ded97944d68 R12: 0000000000000000 [3868.749373] R13: ffff90b09afe4a28 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff90b0cd793b88 [3868.750725] FS: 00007f281c4a8b80(0000) GS:ffff90b3ada00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [3868.752275] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [3868.753515] CR2: 00007f281c6a5000 CR3: 0000000108a42006 CR4: 0000000000370ee0 [3868.754869] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [3868.756228] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [3868.757803] Call Trace: [3868.758281] <TASK> [3868.758655] ? btrfs_merge_delayed_refs+0x178/0x1c0 [btrfs] [3868.759827] __btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0x2b1/0x1250 [btrfs] [3868.761047] btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0x86/0x210 [btrfs] [3868.762069] ? lock_acquired+0x19f/0x420 [3868.762829] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x69/0xb20 [btrfs] [3868.763860] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x29/0x40 [3868.764614] ? btrfs_block_rsv_release+0x1c2/0x1e0 [btrfs] [3868.765870] create_subvol+0x1d8/0x9a0 [btrfs] [3868.766766] btrfs_mksubvol+0x447/0x4c0 [btrfs] [3868.767669] ? preempt_count_add+0x49/0xa0 [3868.768444] __btrfs_ioctl_snap_create+0x123/0x190 [btrfs] [3868.769639] ? _copy_from_user+0x66/0xa0 [3868.770391] btrfs_ioctl_snap_create_v2+0xbb/0x140 [btrfs] [3868.771495] btrfs_ioctl+0xd1e/0x35c0 [btrfs] [3868.772364] ? __slab_free+0x10a/0x360 [3868.773198] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x12/0x60 [3868.774121] ? lock_release+0x223/0x4a0 [3868.774863] ? lock_acquired+0x19f/0x420 [3868.775634] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x12/0x60 [3868.776530] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0x1b/0xe0 [3868.777373] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3e/0x60 [3868.778280] ? kmem_cache_free+0x321/0x3c0 [3868.779011] ? __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0 [3868.779718] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0 [3868.780387] do_syscall_64+0x3b/0xc0 [3868.781059] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae [3868.781953] RIP: 0033:0x7f281c59e957 [3868.782585] Code: 3c 1c 48 f7 d8 4c (...) [3868.785867] RSP: 002b:00007ffe1f83e2b8 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010 [3868.787198] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 00007f281c59e957 [3868.788450] RDX: 00007ffe1f83e2c0 RSI: 0000000050009418 RDI: 0000000000000003 [3868.789748] RBP: 00007ffe1f83f300 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 00007ffe1f83fe36 [3868.791214] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 0000000000000003 [3868.792468] R13: 0000000000000003 R14: 00007ffe1f83e2c0 R15: 00000000000003cc [3868.793765] </TASK> [3868.794037] irq event stamp: 0 [3868.794548] hardirqs last enabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0 [3868.795670] hardirqs last disabled at (0): [<ffffffff98294214>] copy_process+0x934/0x2040 [3868.797086] softirqs last enabled at (0): [<ffffffff98294214>] copy_process+0x934/0x2040 [3868.798309] softirqs last disabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0 [3868.799284] ---[ end trace be24c7002fe27747 ]--- [3868.799928] BTRFS info (device dm-0): leaf 241188864 gen 1268 total ptrs 214 free space 469 owner 2 [3868.801133] BTRFS info (device dm-0): refs 2 lock_owner 225627 current 225627 [3868.802056] item 0 key (237436928 169 0) itemoff 16250 itemsize 33 [3868.802863] extent refs 1 gen 1265 flags 2 [3868.803447] ref#0: tree block backref root 1610 (...) [3869.064354] item 114 key (241008640 169 0) itemoff 12488 itemsize 33 [3869.065421] extent refs 1 gen 1268 flags 2 [3869.066115] ref#0: tree block backref root 1689 (...) [3869.403834] BTRFS error (device dm-0): unable to find ref byte nr 241008640 parent 0 root 1622 owner 0 offset 0 [3869.405641] BTRFS: error (device dm-0) in __btrfs_free_extent:3076: errno=-2 No such entry [3869.407138] BTRFS: error (device dm-0) in btrfs_run_delayed_refs:2159: errno=-2 No such entry
Fix this by passing the new subvolume's root ID to btrfs_free_tree_block(). This requires changing the root argument of btrfs_free_tree_block() from struct btrfs_root * to a u64, since at this point during the subvolume creation we have not yet created the struct btrfs_root for the new subvolume, and btrfs_free_tree_block() only needs a root ID and nothing else from a struct btrfs_root.
This was triggered by test case generic/475 from fstests.
Fixes: 67addf29004c5b ("btrfs: fix metadata extent leak after failure to create subvolume") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
show more ...
|
#
9bc53f5a |
| 13-Dec-2021 |
Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> |
btrfs: fix invalid delayed ref after subvolume creation failure
[ Upstream commit 7a1636089acfee7562fe79aff7d1b4c57869896d ]
When creating a subvolume, at ioctl.c:create_subvol(), if we fail to ins
btrfs: fix invalid delayed ref after subvolume creation failure
[ Upstream commit 7a1636089acfee7562fe79aff7d1b4c57869896d ]
When creating a subvolume, at ioctl.c:create_subvol(), if we fail to insert the new root's root item into the root tree, we are freeing the metadata extent we reserved for the new root to prevent a metadata extent leak, as we don't abort the transaction at that point (since there is nothing at that point that is irreversible).
However we allocated the metadata extent for the new root which we are creating for the new subvolume, so its delayed reference refers to the ID of this new root. But when we free the metadata extent we pass the root of the subvolume where the new subvolume is located to btrfs_free_tree_block() - this is incorrect because this will generate a delayed reference that refers to the ID of the parent subvolume's root, and not to ID of the new root.
This results in a failure when running delayed references that leads to a transaction abort and a trace like the following:
[3868.738042] RIP: 0010:__btrfs_free_extent+0x709/0x950 [btrfs] [3868.739857] Code: 68 0f 85 e6 fb ff (...) [3868.742963] RSP: 0018:ffffb0e9045cf910 EFLAGS: 00010246 [3868.743908] RAX: 00000000fffffffe RBX: 00000000fffffffe RCX: 0000000000000002 [3868.745312] RDX: 00000000fffffffe RSI: 0000000000000002 RDI: ffff90b0cd793b88 [3868.746643] RBP: 000000000e5d8000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffff90b0cd793b88 [3868.747979] R10: 0000000000000002 R11: 00014ded97944d68 R12: 0000000000000000 [3868.749373] R13: ffff90b09afe4a28 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff90b0cd793b88 [3868.750725] FS: 00007f281c4a8b80(0000) GS:ffff90b3ada00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [3868.752275] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [3868.753515] CR2: 00007f281c6a5000 CR3: 0000000108a42006 CR4: 0000000000370ee0 [3868.754869] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [3868.756228] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [3868.757803] Call Trace: [3868.758281] <TASK> [3868.758655] ? btrfs_merge_delayed_refs+0x178/0x1c0 [btrfs] [3868.759827] __btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0x2b1/0x1250 [btrfs] [3868.761047] btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0x86/0x210 [btrfs] [3868.762069] ? lock_acquired+0x19f/0x420 [3868.762829] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x69/0xb20 [btrfs] [3868.763860] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x29/0x40 [3868.764614] ? btrfs_block_rsv_release+0x1c2/0x1e0 [btrfs] [3868.765870] create_subvol+0x1d8/0x9a0 [btrfs] [3868.766766] btrfs_mksubvol+0x447/0x4c0 [btrfs] [3868.767669] ? preempt_count_add+0x49/0xa0 [3868.768444] __btrfs_ioctl_snap_create+0x123/0x190 [btrfs] [3868.769639] ? _copy_from_user+0x66/0xa0 [3868.770391] btrfs_ioctl_snap_create_v2+0xbb/0x140 [btrfs] [3868.771495] btrfs_ioctl+0xd1e/0x35c0 [btrfs] [3868.772364] ? __slab_free+0x10a/0x360 [3868.773198] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x12/0x60 [3868.774121] ? lock_release+0x223/0x4a0 [3868.774863] ? lock_acquired+0x19f/0x420 [3868.775634] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x12/0x60 [3868.776530] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0x1b/0xe0 [3868.777373] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3e/0x60 [3868.778280] ? kmem_cache_free+0x321/0x3c0 [3868.779011] ? __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0 [3868.779718] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0 [3868.780387] do_syscall_64+0x3b/0xc0 [3868.781059] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae [3868.781953] RIP: 0033:0x7f281c59e957 [3868.782585] Code: 3c 1c 48 f7 d8 4c (...) [3868.785867] RSP: 002b:00007ffe1f83e2b8 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010 [3868.787198] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 00007f281c59e957 [3868.788450] RDX: 00007ffe1f83e2c0 RSI: 0000000050009418 RDI: 0000000000000003 [3868.789748] RBP: 00007ffe1f83f300 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 00007ffe1f83fe36 [3868.791214] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 0000000000000003 [3868.792468] R13: 0000000000000003 R14: 00007ffe1f83e2c0 R15: 00000000000003cc [3868.793765] </TASK> [3868.794037] irq event stamp: 0 [3868.794548] hardirqs last enabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0 [3868.795670] hardirqs last disabled at (0): [<ffffffff98294214>] copy_process+0x934/0x2040 [3868.797086] softirqs last enabled at (0): [<ffffffff98294214>] copy_process+0x934/0x2040 [3868.798309] softirqs last disabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0 [3868.799284] ---[ end trace be24c7002fe27747 ]--- [3868.799928] BTRFS info (device dm-0): leaf 241188864 gen 1268 total ptrs 214 free space 469 owner 2 [3868.801133] BTRFS info (device dm-0): refs 2 lock_owner 225627 current 225627 [3868.802056] item 0 key (237436928 169 0) itemoff 16250 itemsize 33 [3868.802863] extent refs 1 gen 1265 flags 2 [3868.803447] ref#0: tree block backref root 1610 (...) [3869.064354] item 114 key (241008640 169 0) itemoff 12488 itemsize 33 [3869.065421] extent refs 1 gen 1268 flags 2 [3869.066115] ref#0: tree block backref root 1689 (...) [3869.403834] BTRFS error (device dm-0): unable to find ref byte nr 241008640 parent 0 root 1622 owner 0 offset 0 [3869.405641] BTRFS: error (device dm-0) in __btrfs_free_extent:3076: errno=-2 No such entry [3869.407138] BTRFS: error (device dm-0) in btrfs_run_delayed_refs:2159: errno=-2 No such entry
Fix this by passing the new subvolume's root ID to btrfs_free_tree_block(). This requires changing the root argument of btrfs_free_tree_block() from struct btrfs_root * to a u64, since at this point during the subvolume creation we have not yet created the struct btrfs_root for the new subvolume, and btrfs_free_tree_block() only needs a root ID and nothing else from a struct btrfs_root.
This was triggered by test case generic/475 from fstests.
Fixes: 67addf29004c5b ("btrfs: fix metadata extent leak after failure to create subvolume") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
show more ...
|
#
9bc53f5a |
| 13-Dec-2021 |
Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> |
btrfs: fix invalid delayed ref after subvolume creation failure
[ Upstream commit 7a1636089acfee7562fe79aff7d1b4c57869896d ]
When creating a subvolume, at ioctl.c:create_subvol(), if we fail to ins
btrfs: fix invalid delayed ref after subvolume creation failure
[ Upstream commit 7a1636089acfee7562fe79aff7d1b4c57869896d ]
When creating a subvolume, at ioctl.c:create_subvol(), if we fail to insert the new root's root item into the root tree, we are freeing the metadata extent we reserved for the new root to prevent a metadata extent leak, as we don't abort the transaction at that point (since there is nothing at that point that is irreversible).
However we allocated the metadata extent for the new root which we are creating for the new subvolume, so its delayed reference refers to the ID of this new root. But when we free the metadata extent we pass the root of the subvolume where the new subvolume is located to btrfs_free_tree_block() - this is incorrect because this will generate a delayed reference that refers to the ID of the parent subvolume's root, and not to ID of the new root.
This results in a failure when running delayed references that leads to a transaction abort and a trace like the following:
[3868.738042] RIP: 0010:__btrfs_free_extent+0x709/0x950 [btrfs] [3868.739857] Code: 68 0f 85 e6 fb ff (...) [3868.742963] RSP: 0018:ffffb0e9045cf910 EFLAGS: 00010246 [3868.743908] RAX: 00000000fffffffe RBX: 00000000fffffffe RCX: 0000000000000002 [3868.745312] RDX: 00000000fffffffe RSI: 0000000000000002 RDI: ffff90b0cd793b88 [3868.746643] RBP: 000000000e5d8000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffff90b0cd793b88 [3868.747979] R10: 0000000000000002 R11: 00014ded97944d68 R12: 0000000000000000 [3868.749373] R13: ffff90b09afe4a28 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff90b0cd793b88 [3868.750725] FS: 00007f281c4a8b80(0000) GS:ffff90b3ada00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [3868.752275] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [3868.753515] CR2: 00007f281c6a5000 CR3: 0000000108a42006 CR4: 0000000000370ee0 [3868.754869] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [3868.756228] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [3868.757803] Call Trace: [3868.758281] <TASK> [3868.758655] ? btrfs_merge_delayed_refs+0x178/0x1c0 [btrfs] [3868.759827] __btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0x2b1/0x1250 [btrfs] [3868.761047] btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0x86/0x210 [btrfs] [3868.762069] ? lock_acquired+0x19f/0x420 [3868.762829] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x69/0xb20 [btrfs] [3868.763860] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x29/0x40 [3868.764614] ? btrfs_block_rsv_release+0x1c2/0x1e0 [btrfs] [3868.765870] create_subvol+0x1d8/0x9a0 [btrfs] [3868.766766] btrfs_mksubvol+0x447/0x4c0 [btrfs] [3868.767669] ? preempt_count_add+0x49/0xa0 [3868.768444] __btrfs_ioctl_snap_create+0x123/0x190 [btrfs] [3868.769639] ? _copy_from_user+0x66/0xa0 [3868.770391] btrfs_ioctl_snap_create_v2+0xbb/0x140 [btrfs] [3868.771495] btrfs_ioctl+0xd1e/0x35c0 [btrfs] [3868.772364] ? __slab_free+0x10a/0x360 [3868.773198] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x12/0x60 [3868.774121] ? lock_release+0x223/0x4a0 [3868.774863] ? lock_acquired+0x19f/0x420 [3868.775634] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x12/0x60 [3868.776530] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0x1b/0xe0 [3868.777373] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3e/0x60 [3868.778280] ? kmem_cache_free+0x321/0x3c0 [3868.779011] ? __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0 [3868.779718] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0 [3868.780387] do_syscall_64+0x3b/0xc0 [3868.781059] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae [3868.781953] RIP: 0033:0x7f281c59e957 [3868.782585] Code: 3c 1c 48 f7 d8 4c (...) [3868.785867] RSP: 002b:00007ffe1f83e2b8 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010 [3868.787198] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 00007f281c59e957 [3868.788450] RDX: 00007ffe1f83e2c0 RSI: 0000000050009418 RDI: 0000000000000003 [3868.789748] RBP: 00007ffe1f83f300 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 00007ffe1f83fe36 [3868.791214] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 0000000000000003 [3868.792468] R13: 0000000000000003 R14: 00007ffe1f83e2c0 R15: 00000000000003cc [3868.793765] </TASK> [3868.794037] irq event stamp: 0 [3868.794548] hardirqs last enabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0 [3868.795670] hardirqs last disabled at (0): [<ffffffff98294214>] copy_process+0x934/0x2040 [3868.797086] softirqs last enabled at (0): [<ffffffff98294214>] copy_process+0x934/0x2040 [3868.798309] softirqs last disabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0 [3868.799284] ---[ end trace be24c7002fe27747 ]--- [3868.799928] BTRFS info (device dm-0): leaf 241188864 gen 1268 total ptrs 214 free space 469 owner 2 [3868.801133] BTRFS info (device dm-0): refs 2 lock_owner 225627 current 225627 [3868.802056] item 0 key (237436928 169 0) itemoff 16250 itemsize 33 [3868.802863] extent refs 1 gen 1265 flags 2 [3868.803447] ref#0: tree block backref root 1610 (...) [3869.064354] item 114 key (241008640 169 0) itemoff 12488 itemsize 33 [3869.065421] extent refs 1 gen 1268 flags 2 [3869.066115] ref#0: tree block backref root 1689 (...) [3869.403834] BTRFS error (device dm-0): unable to find ref byte nr 241008640 parent 0 root 1622 owner 0 offset 0 [3869.405641] BTRFS: error (device dm-0) in __btrfs_free_extent:3076: errno=-2 No such entry [3869.407138] BTRFS: error (device dm-0) in btrfs_run_delayed_refs:2159: errno=-2 No such entry
Fix this by passing the new subvolume's root ID to btrfs_free_tree_block(). This requires changing the root argument of btrfs_free_tree_block() from struct btrfs_root * to a u64, since at this point during the subvolume creation we have not yet created the struct btrfs_root for the new subvolume, and btrfs_free_tree_block() only needs a root ID and nothing else from a struct btrfs_root.
This was triggered by test case generic/475 from fstests.
Fixes: 67addf29004c5b ("btrfs: fix metadata extent leak after failure to create subvolume") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
show more ...
|
#
9bc53f5a |
| 13-Dec-2021 |
Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> |
btrfs: fix invalid delayed ref after subvolume creation failure
[ Upstream commit 7a1636089acfee7562fe79aff7d1b4c57869896d ]
When creating a subvolume, at ioctl.c:create_subvol(), if we fail to ins
btrfs: fix invalid delayed ref after subvolume creation failure
[ Upstream commit 7a1636089acfee7562fe79aff7d1b4c57869896d ]
When creating a subvolume, at ioctl.c:create_subvol(), if we fail to insert the new root's root item into the root tree, we are freeing the metadata extent we reserved for the new root to prevent a metadata extent leak, as we don't abort the transaction at that point (since there is nothing at that point that is irreversible).
However we allocated the metadata extent for the new root which we are creating for the new subvolume, so its delayed reference refers to the ID of this new root. But when we free the metadata extent we pass the root of the subvolume where the new subvolume is located to btrfs_free_tree_block() - this is incorrect because this will generate a delayed reference that refers to the ID of the parent subvolume's root, and not to ID of the new root.
This results in a failure when running delayed references that leads to a transaction abort and a trace like the following:
[3868.738042] RIP: 0010:__btrfs_free_extent+0x709/0x950 [btrfs] [3868.739857] Code: 68 0f 85 e6 fb ff (...) [3868.742963] RSP: 0018:ffffb0e9045cf910 EFLAGS: 00010246 [3868.743908] RAX: 00000000fffffffe RBX: 00000000fffffffe RCX: 0000000000000002 [3868.745312] RDX: 00000000fffffffe RSI: 0000000000000002 RDI: ffff90b0cd793b88 [3868.746643] RBP: 000000000e5d8000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffff90b0cd793b88 [3868.747979] R10: 0000000000000002 R11: 00014ded97944d68 R12: 0000000000000000 [3868.749373] R13: ffff90b09afe4a28 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff90b0cd793b88 [3868.750725] FS: 00007f281c4a8b80(0000) GS:ffff90b3ada00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [3868.752275] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [3868.753515] CR2: 00007f281c6a5000 CR3: 0000000108a42006 CR4: 0000000000370ee0 [3868.754869] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [3868.756228] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [3868.757803] Call Trace: [3868.758281] <TASK> [3868.758655] ? btrfs_merge_delayed_refs+0x178/0x1c0 [btrfs] [3868.759827] __btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0x2b1/0x1250 [btrfs] [3868.761047] btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0x86/0x210 [btrfs] [3868.762069] ? lock_acquired+0x19f/0x420 [3868.762829] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x69/0xb20 [btrfs] [3868.763860] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x29/0x40 [3868.764614] ? btrfs_block_rsv_release+0x1c2/0x1e0 [btrfs] [3868.765870] create_subvol+0x1d8/0x9a0 [btrfs] [3868.766766] btrfs_mksubvol+0x447/0x4c0 [btrfs] [3868.767669] ? preempt_count_add+0x49/0xa0 [3868.768444] __btrfs_ioctl_snap_create+0x123/0x190 [btrfs] [3868.769639] ? _copy_from_user+0x66/0xa0 [3868.770391] btrfs_ioctl_snap_create_v2+0xbb/0x140 [btrfs] [3868.771495] btrfs_ioctl+0xd1e/0x35c0 [btrfs] [3868.772364] ? __slab_free+0x10a/0x360 [3868.773198] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x12/0x60 [3868.774121] ? lock_release+0x223/0x4a0 [3868.774863] ? lock_acquired+0x19f/0x420 [3868.775634] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x12/0x60 [3868.776530] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0x1b/0xe0 [3868.777373] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3e/0x60 [3868.778280] ? kmem_cache_free+0x321/0x3c0 [3868.779011] ? __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0 [3868.779718] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0 [3868.780387] do_syscall_64+0x3b/0xc0 [3868.781059] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae [3868.781953] RIP: 0033:0x7f281c59e957 [3868.782585] Code: 3c 1c 48 f7 d8 4c (...) [3868.785867] RSP: 002b:00007ffe1f83e2b8 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010 [3868.787198] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 00007f281c59e957 [3868.788450] RDX: 00007ffe1f83e2c0 RSI: 0000000050009418 RDI: 0000000000000003 [3868.789748] RBP: 00007ffe1f83f300 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 00007ffe1f83fe36 [3868.791214] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 0000000000000003 [3868.792468] R13: 0000000000000003 R14: 00007ffe1f83e2c0 R15: 00000000000003cc [3868.793765] </TASK> [3868.794037] irq event stamp: 0 [3868.794548] hardirqs last enabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0 [3868.795670] hardirqs last disabled at (0): [<ffffffff98294214>] copy_process+0x934/0x2040 [3868.797086] softirqs last enabled at (0): [<ffffffff98294214>] copy_process+0x934/0x2040 [3868.798309] softirqs last disabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0 [3868.799284] ---[ end trace be24c7002fe27747 ]--- [3868.799928] BTRFS info (device dm-0): leaf 241188864 gen 1268 total ptrs 214 free space 469 owner 2 [3868.801133] BTRFS info (device dm-0): refs 2 lock_owner 225627 current 225627 [3868.802056] item 0 key (237436928 169 0) itemoff 16250 itemsize 33 [3868.802863] extent refs 1 gen 1265 flags 2 [3868.803447] ref#0: tree block backref root 1610 (...) [3869.064354] item 114 key (241008640 169 0) itemoff 12488 itemsize 33 [3869.065421] extent refs 1 gen 1268 flags 2 [3869.066115] ref#0: tree block backref root 1689 (...) [3869.403834] BTRFS error (device dm-0): unable to find ref byte nr 241008640 parent 0 root 1622 owner 0 offset 0 [3869.405641] BTRFS: error (device dm-0) in __btrfs_free_extent:3076: errno=-2 No such entry [3869.407138] BTRFS: error (device dm-0) in btrfs_run_delayed_refs:2159: errno=-2 No such entry
Fix this by passing the new subvolume's root ID to btrfs_free_tree_block(). This requires changing the root argument of btrfs_free_tree_block() from struct btrfs_root * to a u64, since at this point during the subvolume creation we have not yet created the struct btrfs_root for the new subvolume, and btrfs_free_tree_block() only needs a root ID and nothing else from a struct btrfs_root.
This was triggered by test case generic/475 from fstests.
Fixes: 67addf29004c5b ("btrfs: fix metadata extent leak after failure to create subvolume") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
show more ...
|