History log of /openbmc/linux/fs/btrfs/disk-io.h (Results 1 – 25 of 387)
Revision (<<< Hide revision tags) (Show revision tags >>>) Date Author Comments
Revision tags: v6.6.25, v6.6.24, v6.6.23
# eb344109 23-Feb-2024 Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>

btrfs: fix double free of anonymous device after snapshot creation failure

commit e2b54eaf28df0c978626c9736b94f003b523b451 upstream.

When creating a snapshot we may do a double free of an anonymous

btrfs: fix double free of anonymous device after snapshot creation failure

commit e2b54eaf28df0c978626c9736b94f003b523b451 upstream.

When creating a snapshot we may do a double free of an anonymous device
in case there's an error committing the transaction. The second free may
result in freeing an anonymous device number that was allocated by some
other subsystem in the kernel or another btrfs filesystem.

The steps that lead to this:

1) At ioctl.c:create_snapshot() we allocate an anonymous device number
and assign it to pending_snapshot->anon_dev;

2) Then we call btrfs_commit_transaction() and end up at
transaction.c:create_pending_snapshot();

3) There we call btrfs_get_new_fs_root() and pass it the anonymous device
number stored in pending_snapshot->anon_dev;

4) btrfs_get_new_fs_root() frees that anonymous device number because
btrfs_lookup_fs_root() returned a root - someone else did a lookup
of the new root already, which could some task doing backref walking;

5) After that some error happens in the transaction commit path, and at
ioctl.c:create_snapshot() we jump to the 'fail' label, and after
that we free again the same anonymous device number, which in the
meanwhile may have been reallocated somewhere else, because
pending_snapshot->anon_dev still has the same value as in step 1.

Recently syzbot ran into this and reported the following trace:

------------[ cut here ]------------
ida_free called for id=51 which is not allocated.
WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 31038 at lib/idr.c:525 ida_free+0x370/0x420 lib/idr.c:525
Modules linked in:
CPU: 1 PID: 31038 Comm: syz-executor.2 Not tainted 6.8.0-rc4-syzkaller-00410-gc02197fc9076 #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/25/2024
RIP: 0010:ida_free+0x370/0x420 lib/idr.c:525
Code: 10 42 80 3c 28 (...)
RSP: 0018:ffffc90015a67300 EFLAGS: 00010246
RAX: be5130472f5dd000 RBX: 0000000000000033 RCX: 0000000000040000
RDX: ffffc90009a7a000 RSI: 000000000003ffff RDI: 0000000000040000
RBP: ffffc90015a673f0 R08: ffffffff81577992 R09: 1ffff92002b4cdb4
R10: dffffc0000000000 R11: fffff52002b4cdb5 R12: 0000000000000246
R13: dffffc0000000000 R14: ffffffff8e256b80 R15: 0000000000000246
FS: 00007fca3f4b46c0(0000) GS:ffff8880b9500000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 00007f167a17b978 CR3: 000000001ed26000 CR4: 0000000000350ef0
Call Trace:
<TASK>
btrfs_get_root_ref+0xa48/0xaf0 fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:1346
create_pending_snapshot+0xff2/0x2bc0 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:1837
create_pending_snapshots+0x195/0x1d0 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:1931
btrfs_commit_transaction+0xf1c/0x3740 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:2404
create_snapshot+0x507/0x880 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:848
btrfs_mksubvol+0x5d0/0x750 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:998
btrfs_mksnapshot+0xb5/0xf0 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:1044
__btrfs_ioctl_snap_create+0x387/0x4b0 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:1306
btrfs_ioctl_snap_create_v2+0x1ca/0x400 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:1393
btrfs_ioctl+0xa74/0xd40
vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]
__do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:871 [inline]
__se_sys_ioctl+0xfe/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:857
do_syscall_64+0xfb/0x240
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6f/0x77
RIP: 0033:0x7fca3e67dda9
Code: 28 00 00 00 (...)
RSP: 002b:00007fca3f4b40c8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007fca3e7abf80 RCX: 00007fca3e67dda9
RDX: 00000000200005c0 RSI: 0000000050009417 RDI: 0000000000000003
RBP: 00007fca3e6ca47a R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 000000000000000b R14: 00007fca3e7abf80 R15: 00007fff6bf95658
</TASK>

Where we get an explicit message where we attempt to free an anonymous
device number that is not currently allocated. It happens in a different
code path from the example below, at btrfs_get_root_ref(), so this change
may not fix the case triggered by syzbot.

To fix at least the code path from the example above, change
btrfs_get_root_ref() and its callers to receive a dev_t pointer argument
for the anonymous device number, so that in case it frees the number, it
also resets it to 0, so that up in the call chain we don't attempt to do
the double free.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.10+
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/000000000000f673a1061202f630@google.com/
Fixes: e03ee2fe873e ("btrfs: do not ASSERT() if the newly created subvolume already got read")
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

show more ...


Revision tags: v6.6.16, v6.6.15, v6.6.14, v6.6.13, v6.6.12, v6.6.11, v6.6.10, v6.6.9, v6.6.8, v6.6.7, v6.6.6, v6.6.5, v6.6.4, v6.6.3, v6.6.2, v6.5.11, v6.6.1, v6.5.10, v6.6, v6.5.9, v6.5.8, v6.5.7, v6.5.6, v6.5.5, v6.5.4, v6.5.3
# d5e09e38 12-Sep-2023 Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>

btrfs: abort transaction on generation mismatch when marking eb as dirty

[ Upstream commit 50564b651d01c19ce732819c5b3c3fd60707188e ]

When marking an extent buffer as dirty, at btrfs_mark_buffer_di

btrfs: abort transaction on generation mismatch when marking eb as dirty

[ Upstream commit 50564b651d01c19ce732819c5b3c3fd60707188e ]

When marking an extent buffer as dirty, at btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty(),
we check if its generation matches the running transaction and if not we
just print a warning. Such mismatch is an indicator that something really
went wrong and only printing a warning message (and stack trace) is not
enough to prevent a corruption. Allowing a transaction to commit with such
an extent buffer will trigger an error if we ever try to read it from disk
due to a generation mismatch with its parent generation.

So abort the current transaction with -EUCLEAN if we notice a generation
mismatch. For this we need to pass a transaction handle to
btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty() which is always available except in test code,
in which case we can pass NULL since it operates on dummy extent buffers
and all test roots have a single node/leaf (root node at level 0).

Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

show more ...


Revision tags: v6.5.2, v6.1.51, v6.5.1, v6.1.50, v6.5, v6.1.49, v6.1.48, v6.1.46, v6.1.45, v6.1.44, v6.1.43, v6.1.42
# 504b1596 26-Jul-2023 Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>

btrfs: make btrfs_cleanup_fs_roots() static

btrfs_cleanup_fs_roots() is not used outside disk-io.c, so make it static,
remove its prototype from disk-io.h and move its definition above the
where it'

btrfs: make btrfs_cleanup_fs_roots() static

btrfs_cleanup_fs_roots() is not used outside disk-io.c, so make it static,
remove its prototype from disk-io.h and move its definition above the
where it's used in disk-io.c

Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...


Revision tags: v6.1.41, v6.1.40, v6.1.39, v6.1.38, v6.1.37, v6.1.36, v6.4, v6.1.35, v6.1.34, v6.1.33, v6.1.32, v6.1.31, v6.1.30, v6.1.29, v6.1.28
# 046b562b 03-May-2023 Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

btrfs: use a separate end_io handler for read_extent_buffer

Now that we always use a single bio to read an extent_buffer, the buffer
can be passed to the end_io handler as private data. This allows

btrfs: use a separate end_io handler for read_extent_buffer

Now that we always use a single bio to read an extent_buffer, the buffer
can be passed to the end_io handler as private data. This allows
implementing a much simplified dedicated end I/O handler for metadata
reads.

Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...


Revision tags: v6.1.27
# 2cac5af1 29-Apr-2023 Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>

btrfs: move btrfs_verify_level_key into tree-checker.c

This is more a buffer validation helper, move it into the tree-checker
files where it makes more sense.

Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johan

btrfs: move btrfs_verify_level_key into tree-checker.c

This is more a buffer validation helper, move it into the tree-checker
files where it makes more sense.

Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...


Revision tags: v6.1.26, v6.3, v6.1.25, v6.1.24, v6.1.23, v6.1.22, v6.1.21, v6.1.20, v6.1.19, v6.1.18, v6.1.17, v6.1.16, v6.1.15, v6.1.14, v6.1.13, v6.2, v6.1.12, v6.1.11, v6.1.10, v6.1.9
# 190a8339 26-Jan-2023 Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>

btrfs: rename btrfs_clean_tree_block to btrfs_clear_buffer_dirty

btrfs_clean_tree_block is a misnomer, it's just
clear_extent_buffer_dirty with some extra accounting around it. Rename
this to btrfs

btrfs: rename btrfs_clean_tree_block to btrfs_clear_buffer_dirty

btrfs_clean_tree_block is a misnomer, it's just
clear_extent_buffer_dirty with some extra accounting around it. Rename
this to btrfs_clear_buffer_dirty to make it more clear it belongs with
it's setter, btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty.

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...


# ed25dab3 26-Jan-2023 Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>

btrfs: add trans argument to btrfs_clean_tree_block

We check the header generation in the extent buffer against the current
running transaction id to see if it's safe to clear DIRTY on this
buffer.

btrfs: add trans argument to btrfs_clean_tree_block

We check the header generation in the extent buffer against the current
running transaction id to see if it's safe to clear DIRTY on this
buffer. Generally speaking if we're clearing the buffer dirty we're
holding the transaction open, but in the case of cleaning up an aborted
transaction we don't, so we have extra checks in that path to check the
transid. To allow for a future cleanup go ahead and pass in the trans
handle so we don't have to rely on ->running_transaction being set.

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...


Revision tags: v6.1.8
# 35a8d7da 21-Jan-2023 Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

btrfs: remove now spurious bio submission helpers

Call btrfs_submit_bio and btrfs_submit_compressed_read directly from
submit_one_bio now that all additional functionality has moved into
btrfs_submi

btrfs: remove now spurious bio submission helpers

Call btrfs_submit_bio and btrfs_submit_compressed_read directly from
submit_one_bio now that all additional functionality has moved into
btrfs_submit_bio.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...


# 542e300e 21-Jan-2023 Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

btrfs: support cloned bios in btree_csum_one_bio

To allow splitting bios in btrfs_submit_bio, btree_csum_one_bio needs to
be able to handle cloned bios. As btree_csum_one_bio is always called
befor

btrfs: support cloned bios in btree_csum_one_bio

To allow splitting bios in btrfs_submit_bio, btree_csum_one_bio needs to
be able to handle cloned bios. As btree_csum_one_bio is always called
before handing the bio to the block layer that is trivially done by using
bio_for_each_segment instead of bio_for_each_segment_all. Also switch
the function to take a btrfs_bio and use that to derive the fs_info.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...


# f8a53bb5 21-Jan-2023 Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

btrfs: handle checksum generation in the storage layer

Instead of letting the callers of btrfs_submit_bio deal with checksumming
the (meta)data in the bio and making decisions on when to offload the

btrfs: handle checksum generation in the storage layer

Instead of letting the callers of btrfs_submit_bio deal with checksumming
the (meta)data in the bio and making decisions on when to offload the
checksumming to the bio, leave that to btrfs_submit_bio. Do do so the
existing btrfs_submit_bio function is split into an upper and a lower
half, so that the lower half can be offloaded to a workqueue.

Note that this changes the behavior for direct writes to raid56 volumes so
that async checksum offloading is not skipped when more I/O is expected.
This runs counter to the argument explaining why it was done, although I
can't measure any affects of the change. Commits later in this series
will make sure the entire direct writes is offloaded to the workqueue
at once and thus make sure it is sent to the raid56 code from a single
thread.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...


# deb6216f 21-Jan-2023 Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

btrfs: open code the submit_bio_start helpers

The submit helpers are now trivial and can be called directly. Note
that btree_csum_one_bio has to be moved up in the file a bit to avoid a
forward dec

btrfs: open code the submit_bio_start helpers

The submit helpers are now trivial and can be called directly. Note
that btree_csum_one_bio has to be moved up in the file a bit to avoid a
forward declaration.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...


Revision tags: v6.1.7, v6.1.6, v6.1.5, v6.0.19, v6.0.18, v6.1.4, v6.1.3, v6.0.17, v6.1.2, v6.0.16
# 2ba48b20 21-Dec-2022 Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>

btrfs: fix compat_ro checks against remount

[BUG]
Even with commit 81d5d61454c3 ("btrfs: enhance unsupported compat RO
flags handling"), btrfs can still mount a fs with unsupported compat_ro
flags r

btrfs: fix compat_ro checks against remount

[BUG]
Even with commit 81d5d61454c3 ("btrfs: enhance unsupported compat RO
flags handling"), btrfs can still mount a fs with unsupported compat_ro
flags read-only, then remount it RW:

# btrfs ins dump-super /dev/loop0 | grep compat_ro_flags -A 3
compat_ro_flags 0x403
( FREE_SPACE_TREE |
FREE_SPACE_TREE_VALID |
unknown flag: 0x400 )

# mount /dev/loop0 /mnt/btrfs
mount: /mnt/btrfs: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/loop0, missing codepage or helper program, or other error.
dmesg(1) may have more information after failed mount system call.
^^^ RW mount failed as expected ^^^

# dmesg -t | tail -n5
loop0: detected capacity change from 0 to 1048576
BTRFS: device fsid cb5b82f5-0fdd-4d81-9b4b-78533c324afa devid 1 transid 7 /dev/loop0 scanned by mount (1146)
BTRFS info (device loop0): using crc32c (crc32c-intel) checksum algorithm
BTRFS info (device loop0): using free space tree
BTRFS error (device loop0): cannot mount read-write because of unknown compat_ro features (0x403)
BTRFS error (device loop0): open_ctree failed

# mount /dev/loop0 -o ro /mnt/btrfs
# mount -o remount,rw /mnt/btrfs
^^^ RW remount succeeded unexpectedly ^^^

[CAUSE]
Currently we use btrfs_check_features() to check compat_ro flags against
our current mount flags.

That function get reused between open_ctree() and btrfs_remount().

But for btrfs_remount(), the super block we passed in still has the old
mount flags, thus btrfs_check_features() still believes we're mounting
read-only.

[FIX]
Replace the existing @sb argument with @is_rw_mount.

As originally we only use @sb to determine if the mount is RW.

Now it's callers' responsibility to determine if the mount is RW, and
since there are only two callers, the check is pretty simple:

- caller in open_ctree()
Just pass !sb_rdonly().

- caller in btrfs_remount()
Pass !(*flags & SB_RDONLY), as our check should be against the new
flags.

Now we can correctly reject the RW remount:

# mount /dev/loop0 -o ro /mnt/btrfs
# mount -o remount,rw /mnt/btrfs
mount: /mnt/btrfs: mount point not mounted or bad option.
dmesg(1) may have more information after failed mount system call.
# dmesg -t | tail -n 1
BTRFS error (device loop0: state M): cannot mount read-write because of unknown compat_ro features (0x403)

Reported-by: Chung-Chiang Cheng <shepjeng@gmail.com>
Fixes: 81d5d61454c3 ("btrfs: enhance unsupported compat RO flags handling")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.15+
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...


Revision tags: v6.1.1, v6.0.15, v6.0.14, v6.0.13, v6.1, v6.0.12, v6.0.11, v6.0.10, v5.15.80, v6.0.9, v5.15.79
# 27137fac 15-Nov-2022 Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

btrfs: move struct btrfs_tree_parent_check out of disk-io.h

Move struct btrfs_tree_parent_check out of disk-io.h so that volumes.h
an various .c files don't have to include disk-io.h just for it.

R

btrfs: move struct btrfs_tree_parent_check out of disk-io.h

Move struct btrfs_tree_parent_check out of disk-io.h so that volumes.h
an various .c files don't have to include disk-io.h just for it.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[ use tree-checker.h for the structure ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...


Revision tags: v6.0.8, v5.15.78, v6.0.7, v5.15.77, v5.15.76, v6.0.6, v6.0.5, v5.15.75, v6.0.4, v6.0.3, v6.0.2, v5.15.74, v5.15.73, v6.0.1, v5.15.72, v6.0, v5.15.71, v5.15.70, v5.15.69, v5.15.68
# 789d6a3a 14-Sep-2022 Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>

btrfs: concentrate all tree block parentness check parameters into one structure

There are several different tree block parentness check parameters used
across several helpers:

- level
Mandatory

btrfs: concentrate all tree block parentness check parameters into one structure

There are several different tree block parentness check parameters used
across several helpers:

- level
Mandatory

- transid
Under most cases it's mandatory, but there are several backref cases
which skips this check.

- owner_root
- first_key
Utilized by most top-down tree search routine. Otherwise can be
skipped.

Those four members are not always mandatory checks, and some of them are
the same u64, which means if some arguments got swapped compiler will
not catch it.

Furthermore if we're going to further expand the parentness check, we
need to modify quite some helpers just to add one more parameter.

This patch will concentrate all these members into a structure called
btrfs_tree_parent_check, and pass that structure for the following
helpers:

- btrfs_read_extent_buffer()
- read_tree_block()

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...


# 644094fd 26-Oct-2022 David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

btrfs: pass btrfs_inode to btrfs_submit_metadata_bio

The function is for internal interfaces so we should use the
btrfs_inode.

Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David S

btrfs: pass btrfs_inode to btrfs_submit_metadata_bio

The function is for internal interfaces so we should use the
btrfs_inode.

Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...


# 5fcdadc2 26-Oct-2022 David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

btrfs: pass btrfs_inode to btrfs_wq_submit_bio

The function is for internal interfaces so we should use the
btrfs_inode.

Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba

btrfs: pass btrfs_inode to btrfs_wq_submit_bio

The function is for internal interfaces so we should use the
btrfs_inode.

Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...


# ad65ecf3 26-Oct-2022 David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

btrfs: simplify btree_submit_bio_start and btrfs_submit_bio_start parameters

After previous patches the unused parameters can be removed from
btree_submit_bio_start and btrfs_submit_bio_start as the

btrfs: simplify btree_submit_bio_start and btrfs_submit_bio_start parameters

After previous patches the unused parameters can be removed from
btree_submit_bio_start and btrfs_submit_bio_start as they don't need to
conform to the extent_submit_bio_start_t typedef.

Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...


# ab2072b2 26-Oct-2022 David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

btrfs: change how submit bio callback is passed to btrfs_wq_submit_bio

There's a callback function parameter for btrfs_wq_submit_bio that can
be one of: metadata, buffered data, direct io data. The

btrfs: change how submit bio callback is passed to btrfs_wq_submit_bio

There's a callback function parameter for btrfs_wq_submit_bio that can
be one of: metadata, buffered data, direct io data. The callback
abstraction is unnecessary as we have all functions available.

Replace the parameter with a command that leads to a direct call in
run_one_async_start. The called functions can be then simplified and we
can also remove the extent_submit_bio_start_t typedef.

Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...


# 911bd75a 24-Oct-2022 Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>

btrfs: remove unused function prototypes

I wrote the following coccinelle script to find function declarations
that didn't have the corresponding code for them

@funcproto@
identifier func;
type T;

btrfs: remove unused function prototypes

I wrote the following coccinelle script to find function declarations
that didn't have the corresponding code for them

@funcproto@
identifier func;
type T;
position p0;
@@

T func@p0(...);

@funccode@
identifier funcproto.func;
position p1;
@@

func@p1(...) { ... }

@script:python depends on !funccode@
p0 << funcproto.p0;
@@
print("Proto with no function at %s:%s" % (p0[0].file, p0[0].line))

and ran it against btrfs, which identified the 4 function prototypes
I've removed in this patch.

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...


# 51129b33 14-Sep-2022 Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>

btrfs: move btrfs_get_block_group helper out of disk-io.h

This inline helper calls btrfs_fs_compat_ro(), which is defined in
another header. To avoid weird header dependency problems move this
help

btrfs: move btrfs_get_block_group helper out of disk-io.h

This inline helper calls btrfs_fs_compat_ro(), which is defined in
another header. To avoid weird header dependency problems move this
helper into disk-io.c with the rest of the global root helpers.

Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...


# 3d17adea 17-Oct-2022 Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>

btrfs: make thaw time super block check to also verify checksum

Previous commit a05d3c915314 ("btrfs: check superblock to ensure the fs
was not modified at thaw time") only checks the content of the

btrfs: make thaw time super block check to also verify checksum

Previous commit a05d3c915314 ("btrfs: check superblock to ensure the fs
was not modified at thaw time") only checks the content of the super
block, but it doesn't really check if the on-disk super block has a
matching checksum.

This patch will add the checksum verification to thaw time superblock
verification.

This involves the following extra changes:

- Export btrfs_check_super_csum()
As we need to call it in super.c.

- Change the argument list of btrfs_check_super_csum()
Instead of passing a char *, directly pass struct btrfs_super_block *
pointer.

- Verify that our checksum type didn't change before checking the
checksum value, like it's done at mount time

Fixes: a05d3c915314 ("btrfs: check superblock to ensure the fs was not modified at thaw time")
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...


# d7f67ac9 12-Sep-2022 Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>

btrfs: relax block-group-tree feature dependency checks

[BUG]
When one user did a wrong attempt to clear block group tree, which can
not be done through mount option, by using "-o clear_cache,space_

btrfs: relax block-group-tree feature dependency checks

[BUG]
When one user did a wrong attempt to clear block group tree, which can
not be done through mount option, by using "-o clear_cache,space_cache=v2",
it will cause the following error on a fs with block-group-tree feature:

BTRFS info (device dm-1): force clearing of disk cache
BTRFS info (device dm-1): using free space tree
BTRFS info (device dm-1): clearing free space tree
BTRFS info (device dm-1): clearing compat-ro feature flag for FREE_SPACE_TREE (0x1)
BTRFS info (device dm-1): clearing compat-ro feature flag for FREE_SPACE_TREE_VALID (0x2)
BTRFS error (device dm-1): block-group-tree feature requires fres-space-tree and no-holes
BTRFS error (device dm-1): super block corruption detected before writing it to disk
BTRFS: error (device dm-1) in write_all_supers:4318: errno=-117 Filesystem corrupted (unexpected superblock corruption detected)
BTRFS warning (device dm-1: state E): Skipping commit of aborted transaction.

[CAUSE]
Although the dependency for block-group-tree feature is just an
artificial one (to reduce test matrix), we put the dependency check into
btrfs_validate_super().

This is too strict, and during space cache clearing, we will have a
window where free space tree is cleared, and we need to commit the super
block.

In that window, we had block group tree without v2 cache, and triggered
the artificial dependency check.

This is not necessary at all, especially for such a soft dependency.

[FIX]
Introduce a new helper, btrfs_check_features(), to do all the runtime
limitation checks, including:

- Unsupported incompat flags check

- Unsupported compat RO flags check

- Setting missing incompat flags

- Artificial feature dependency checks
Currently only block group tree will rely on this.

- Subpage runtime check for v1 cache

With this helper, we can move quite some checks from
open_ctree()/btrfs_remount() into it, and just call it after
btrfs_parse_options().

Now "-o clear_cache,space_cache=v2" will not trigger the above error
anymore.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[ edit messages ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...


Revision tags: v5.15.67, v5.15.66, v5.15.65, v5.15.64, v5.15.63, v5.15.62, v5.15.61, v5.15.60
# 1c56ab99 09-Aug-2022 Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>

btrfs: separate BLOCK_GROUP_TREE compat RO flag from EXTENT_TREE_V2

The problem of long mount time caused by block group item search is
already known for some time, and the solution of block group t

btrfs: separate BLOCK_GROUP_TREE compat RO flag from EXTENT_TREE_V2

The problem of long mount time caused by block group item search is
already known for some time, and the solution of block group tree has
been proposed.

There is really no need to bound this feature into extent tree v2, just
introduce compat RO flag, BLOCK_GROUP_TREE, to correctly solve the
problem.

All the code handling block group root is already in the upstream
kernel, thus this patch really only needs to introduce the new compat RO
flag.

This patch introduces one extra artificial limitation on block group
tree feature, that free space cache v2 and no-holes feature must be
enabled to use this new compat RO feature.

This artificial requirement is mostly to reduce the test combinations,
and can be a guideline for future features, to mostly rely on the latest
default features.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...


# a05d3c91 24-Aug-2022 Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>

btrfs: check superblock to ensure the fs was not modified at thaw time

[BACKGROUND]
There is an incident report that, one user hibernated the system, with
one btrfs on removable device still mounted

btrfs: check superblock to ensure the fs was not modified at thaw time

[BACKGROUND]
There is an incident report that, one user hibernated the system, with
one btrfs on removable device still mounted.

Then by some incident, the btrfs got mounted and modified by another
system/OS, then back to the hibernated system.

After resuming from the hibernation, new write happened into the victim btrfs.

Now the fs is completely broken, since the underlying btrfs is no longer
the same one before the hibernation, and the user lost their data due to
various transid mismatch.

[REPRODUCER]
We can emulate the situation using the following small script:

truncate -s 1G $dev
mkfs.btrfs -f $dev
mount $dev $mnt
fsstress -w -d $mnt -n 500
sync
xfs_freeze -f $mnt
cp $dev $dev.backup

# There is no way to mount the same cloned fs on the same system,
# as the conflicting fsid will be rejected by btrfs.
# Thus here we have to wipe the fs using a different btrfs.
mkfs.btrfs -f $dev.backup

dd if=$dev.backup of=$dev bs=1M
xfs_freeze -u $mnt
fsstress -w -d $mnt -n 20
umount $mnt
btrfs check $dev

The final fsck will fail due to some tree blocks has incorrect fsid.

This is enough to emulate the problem hit by the unfortunate user.

[ENHANCEMENT]
Although such case should not be that common, it can still happen from
time to time.

From the view of btrfs, we can detect any unexpected super block change,
and if there is any unexpected change, we just mark the fs read-only,
and thaw the fs.

By this we can limit the damage to minimal, and I hope no one would lose
their data by this anymore.

Suggested-by: Goffredo Baroncelli <kreijack@libero.it>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/83bf3b4b-7f4c-387a-b286-9251e3991e34@bluemole.com/
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...


Revision tags: v5.15.59, v5.19, v5.15.58
# 0a27a047 26-Jul-2022 Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>

btrfs: move lockdep class helpers to locking.c

These definitions exist in disk-io.c, which is not related to the
locking. Move this over to locking.h/c where it makes more sense.

Reviewed-by: Joha

btrfs: move lockdep class helpers to locking.c

These definitions exist in disk-io.c, which is not related to the
locking. Move this over to locking.h/c where it makes more sense.

Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...


12345678910>>...16