btrfs: add kerneldoc for setup_items_for_insert

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@

btrfs: add kerneldoc for setup_items_for_insert

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...

btrfs: sink total_data parameter in setup_items_for_insert

That parameter can easily be derived based on the "data_size" and "nr"
parameters exploit this fact to simply the function's signature. No

btrfs: sink total_data parameter in setup_items_for_insert

That parameter can easily be derived based on the "data_size" and "nr"
parameters exploit this fact to simply the function's signature. No
functional changes.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...

btrfs: eliminate total_size parameter from setup_items_for_insert

The value of this argument can be derived from the total_data as it's
simply the value of the data size + size of btrfs_items being

btrfs: eliminate total_size parameter from setup_items_for_insert

The value of this argument can be derived from the total_data as it's
simply the value of the data size + size of btrfs_items being touched.
Move the parameter calculation inside the function. This results in a
simpler interface and also a minor size reduction:

./scripts/bloat-o-meter ctree.original fs/btrfs/ctree.o
add/remove: 0/0 grow/shrink: 0/3 up/down: 0/-34 (-34)
Function old new delta
btrfs_duplicate_item 260 259 -1
setup_items_for_insert 1200 1190 -10
btrfs_insert_empty_items 177 154 -23

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...

btrfs: re-arrange statements in setup_items_for_insert

Rearrange statements calculating the offset of the newly added items so
that the calculation has to be done only once. No functional change.

R

btrfs: re-arrange statements in setup_items_for_insert

Rearrange statements calculating the offset of the newly added items so
that the calculation has to be done only once. No functional change.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...

btrfs: use BTRFS_NESTED_NEW_ROOT for double splits

I've made this change separate since it requires both of the newly added
NESTED flags and I didn't want to slip it into one of those changes.

If w

btrfs: use BTRFS_NESTED_NEW_ROOT for double splits

I've made this change separate since it requires both of the newly added
NESTED flags and I didn't want to slip it into one of those changes.

If we do a double split of a node we can end up doing a
BTRFS_NESTED_SPLIT on level 0, which throws lockdep off because it
appears as a double lock. Since we're maxed out on subclasses, use
BTRFS_NESTED_NEW_ROOT if we had to do a double split. This is OK
because we won't have to do a double split if we had to insert a new
root, and the new root would be at a higher level anyway.

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...

btrfs: introduce BTRFS_NESTING_NEW_ROOT for adding new roots

The way we add new roots is confusing from a locking perspective for
lockdep. We generally have the rule that we lock things in order fr

btrfs: introduce BTRFS_NESTING_NEW_ROOT for adding new roots

The way we add new roots is confusing from a locking perspective for
lockdep. We generally have the rule that we lock things in order from
highest level to lowest, but in the case of adding a new level to the
tree we actually allocate a new block for the root, which makes the
locking go in reverse. A similar issue exists for snapshotting, we cow
the original root for the root of a new tree, however they're at the
same level. Address this by using BTRFS_NESTING_NEW_ROOT for these
operations.

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...

btrfs: introduce BTRFS_NESTING_SPLIT for split blocks

If we are splitting a leaf/node, we could do something like the
following

lock(leaf) BTRFS_NESTING_NORMAL
lock(left) BTRFS_NESTING_LEFT + BT

btrfs: introduce BTRFS_NESTING_SPLIT for split blocks

If we are splitting a leaf/node, we could do something like the
following

lock(leaf) BTRFS_NESTING_NORMAL
lock(left) BTRFS_NESTING_LEFT + BTRFS_NESTING_COW
push from leaf -> left
reset path to point to left
split left
allocate new block, lock block BTRFS_NESTING_SPLIT

at the new block point we need to have a different nesting level,
because we have already used either BTRFS_NESTING_LEFT or
BTRFS_NESTING_RIGHT when pushing items from the original leaf into the
adjacent leaves.

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...

btrfs: introduce BTRFS_NESTING_LEFT/RIGHT_COW

For similar reasons as BTRFS_NESTING_COW, we need
BTRFS_NESTING_LEFT/RIGHT_COW. The pattern is this

lock leaf -> BTRFS_NESTING_NORMAL
cow leaf -> BT

btrfs: introduce BTRFS_NESTING_LEFT/RIGHT_COW

For similar reasons as BTRFS_NESTING_COW, we need
BTRFS_NESTING_LEFT/RIGHT_COW. The pattern is this

lock leaf -> BTRFS_NESTING_NORMAL
cow leaf -> BTRFS_NESTING_COW
split leaf
lock left -> BTRFS_NESTING_LEFT
cow left -> BTRFS_NESTING_LEFT_COW

We need this in order to indicate to lockdep that these locks are
discrete and are being taken in a safe order.

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...

btrfs: introduce BTRFS_NESTING_LEFT/BTRFS_NESTING_RIGHT

Our lockdep maps are based on rootid+level, however in some cases we
will lock adjacent blocks on the same level, namely in searching forward

btrfs: introduce BTRFS_NESTING_LEFT/BTRFS_NESTING_RIGHT

Our lockdep maps are based on rootid+level, however in some cases we
will lock adjacent blocks on the same level, namely in searching forward
or in split/balance. Because of this lockdep will complain, so we need
a separate subclass to indicate to lockdep that these are different
locks.

lock leaf -> BTRFS_NESTING_NORMAL
cow leaf -> BTRFS_NESTING_COW
split leaf
lock left -> BTRFS_NESTING_LEFT
lock right -> BTRFS_NESTING_RIGHT

The above graph illustrates the need for this new nesting subclass.

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...

btrfs: introduce BTRFS_NESTING_COW for cow'ing blocks

When we COW a block we are holding a lock on the original block, and
then we lock the new COW block. Because our lockdep maps are based on
root

btrfs: introduce BTRFS_NESTING_COW for cow'ing blocks

When we COW a block we are holding a lock on the original block, and
then we lock the new COW block. Because our lockdep maps are based on
root + level, this will make lockdep complain. We need a way to
indicate a subclass for locking the COW'ed block, so plumb through our
btrfs_lock_nesting from btrfs_cow_block down to the btrfs_init_buffer,
and then introduce BTRFS_NESTING_COW to be used for cow'ing blocks.

The reason I've added all this extra infrastructure is because there
will be need of different nesting classes in follow up patches.

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...

btrfs: add nesting tags to the locking helpers

We will need these when we switch to an rwsem, so plumb in the
infrastructure here to use later on. I violate the 80 character limit
some here because

btrfs: add nesting tags to the locking helpers

We will need these when we switch to an rwsem, so plumb in the
infrastructure here to use later on. I violate the 80 character limit
some here because it'll be cleaned up later.

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...

btrfs: introduce btrfs_path::recurse

Our current tree locking stuff allows us to recurse with read locks if
we're already holding the write lock. This is necessary for the space
cache inode, as we

btrfs: introduce btrfs_path::recurse

Our current tree locking stuff allows us to recurse with read locks if
we're already holding the write lock. This is necessary for the space
cache inode, as we could be holding a lock on the root_tree root when we
need to cache a block group, and thus need to be able to read down the
root_tree to read in the inode cache.

We can get away with this in our current locking, but we won't be able
to with a rwsem. Handle this by purposefully annotating the places
where we require recursion, so that in the future we can maybe come up
with a way to avoid the recursion. In the case of the free space inode,
this will be superseded by the free space tree.

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...

btrfs: ctree: check key order before merging tree blocks

[BUG]
With a crafted image, btrfs can panic at btrfs_del_csums():

kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/ctree.c:3188!
invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI

btrfs: ctree: check key order before merging tree blocks

[BUG]
With a crafted image, btrfs can panic at btrfs_del_csums():

kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/ctree.c:3188!
invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI
CPU: 0 PID: 1156 Comm: btrfs-transacti Not tainted 5.0.0-rc8+ #9
RIP: 0010:btrfs_set_item_key_safe+0x16c/0x180
RSP: 0018:ffff976141257ab8 EFLAGS: 00010202
RAX: 0000000000000001 RBX: ffff898a6b890930 RCX: 0000000004b70000
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff976141257bae RDI: ffff976141257acf
RBP: ffff976141257b10 R08: 0000000000001000 R09: ffff9761412579a8
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff976141257abe
R13: 0000000000000003 R14: ffff898a6a8be578 R15: ffff976141257bae
FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff898a77a00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 00007f779d9cd624 CR3: 000000022b2b4006 CR4: 00000000000206f0
Call Trace:
truncate_one_csum+0xac/0xf0
btrfs_del_csums+0x24f/0x3a0
__btrfs_free_extent.isra.72+0x5a7/0xbe0
__btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0x539/0x1120
btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0xdb/0x1b0
btrfs_commit_transaction+0x52/0x950
? start_transaction+0x94/0x450
transaction_kthread+0x163/0x190
kthread+0x105/0x140
? btrfs_cleanup_transaction+0x560/0x560
? kthread_destroy_worker+0x50/0x50
ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40
Modules linked in:
---[ end trace 93bf9db00e6c374e ]---

[CAUSE]
This crafted image has a tricky key order corruption:

checksum tree key (CSUM_TREE ROOT_ITEM 0)
node 29741056 level 1 items 14 free 107 generation 19 owner CSUM_TREE
...
key (EXTENT_CSUM EXTENT_CSUM 73785344) block 29757440 gen 19
key (EXTENT_CSUM EXTENT_CSUM 77594624) block 29753344 gen 19
...

leaf 29757440 items 5 free space 150 generation 19 owner CSUM_TREE
item 0 key (EXTENT_CSUM EXTENT_CSUM 73785344) itemoff 2323 itemsize 1672
range start 73785344 end 75497472 length 1712128
item 1 key (EXTENT_CSUM EXTENT_CSUM 75497472) itemoff 2319 itemsize 4
range start 75497472 end 75501568 length 4096
item 2 key (EXTENT_CSUM EXTENT_CSUM 75501568) itemoff 579 itemsize 1740
range start 75501568 end 77283328 length 1781760
item 3 key (EXTENT_CSUM EXTENT_CSUM 77283328) itemoff 575 itemsize 4
range start 77283328 end 77287424 length 4096
item 4 key (EXTENT_CSUM EXTENT_CSUM 4120596480) itemoff 275 itemsize 300 <<<
range start 4120596480 end 4120903680 length 307200
leaf 29753344 items 3 free space 1936 generation 19 owner CSUM_TREE
item 0 key (18446744073457893366 EXTENT_CSUM 77594624) itemoff 2323 itemsize 1672
range start 77594624 end 79306752 length 1712128
...

Note the item 4 key of leaf 29757440, which is obviously too large, and
even larger than the first key of the next leaf.

However it still follows the key order in that tree block, thus tree
checker is unable to detect it at read time, since tree checker can only
work inside one leaf, thus such complex corruption can't be detected in
advance.

[FIX]
The next time to detect such problem is at tree block merge time,
which is in push_node_left(), balance_node_right(), push_leaf_left() or
push_leaf_right().

Now we check if the key order of the right-most key of the left node is
larger than the left-most key of the right node.

By this we don't need to call the full tree-checker, while still keeping
the key order correct as key order in each node is already checked by
tree checker thus we only need to check the above two slots.

Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=202833
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...

btrfs: delete duplicated words + other fixes in comments

Delete repeated words in fs/btrfs/.
{to, the, a, and old}
and change "into 2 part" to "into 2 parts".

Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov

btrfs: delete duplicated words + other fixes in comments

Delete repeated words in fs/btrfs/.
{to, the, a, and old}
and change "into 2 part" to "into 2 parts".

Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...

btrfs: set the lockdep class for log tree extent buffers

These are special extent buffers that get rewound in order to lookup
the state of the tree at a specific point in time. As such they do not

btrfs: set the lockdep class for log tree extent buffers

These are special extent buffers that get rewound in order to lookup
the state of the tree at a specific point in time. As such they do not
go through the normal initialization paths that set their lockdep class,
so handle them appropriately when they are created and before they are
locked.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...

btrfs: use the correct const function attribute for btrfs_get_num_csums

The build robot reports

compiler: h8300-linux-gcc (GCC) 9.3.0
In file included from fs/btrfs/tests/extent-map-tests.c:8:
>

btrfs: use the correct const function attribute for btrfs_get_num_csums

The build robot reports

compiler: h8300-linux-gcc (GCC) 9.3.0
In file included from fs/btrfs/tests/extent-map-tests.c:8:
>> fs/btrfs/tests/../ctree.h:2166:8: warning: type qualifiers ignored on function return type [-Wignored-qualifiers]
2166 | size_t __const btrfs_get_num_csums(void);
| ^~~~~~~

The function attribute for const does not follow the expected scheme and
in this case is confused with a const type qualifier.

Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...

btrfs: add little-endian optimized key helpers

The CPU and on-disk keys are mapped to two different structures because
of the endianness. There's an intermediate buffer used to do the
conversion, bu

btrfs: add little-endian optimized key helpers

The CPU and on-disk keys are mapped to two different structures because
of the endianness. There's an intermediate buffer used to do the
conversion, but this is not necessary when CPU and on-disk endianness
match.

Add optimized versions of helpers that take disk_key and use the buffer
directly for CPU keys or drop the intermediate buffer and conversion.

This saves a lot of stack space accross many functions and removes about
6K of generated binary code:

text data bss dec hex filename
1090439 17468 14912 1122819 112203 pre/btrfs.ko
1084613 17456 14912 1116981 110b35 post/btrfs.ko

Delta: -5826

Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...

btrfs: convert comments to fallthrough annotations

Convert fall through comments to the pseudo-keyword which is now the
preferred way.

Signed-off-by: Marcos Paulo de Souza <mpdesouza@suse.com>
Revi

btrfs: convert comments to fallthrough annotations

Convert fall through comments to the pseudo-keyword which is now the
preferred way.

Signed-off-by: Marcos Paulo de Souza <mpdesouza@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...

btrfs: remove redundant local variable in read_block_for_search

The local 'b' variable is only used to directly read values from passed
extent buffer. So eliminate it and directly use the input par

btrfs: remove redundant local variable in read_block_for_search

The local 'b' variable is only used to directly read values from passed
extent buffer. So eliminate it and directly use the input parameter.
Furthermore this shrinks the size of the following functions:

./scripts/bloat-o-meter ctree.orig fs/btrfs/ctree.o
add/remove: 0/0 grow/shrink: 0/2 up/down: 0/-73 (-73)
Function old new delta
read_block_for_search.isra 876 871 -5
push_node_left 1112 1044 -68
Total: Before=50348, After=50275, chg -0.14%

Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...

btrfs: open code key_search

This function wraps the optimisation implemented by d7396f07358a
("Btrfs: optimize key searches in btrfs_search_slot") however this
optimisation is really used in only on

btrfs: open code key_search

This function wraps the optimisation implemented by d7396f07358a
("Btrfs: optimize key searches in btrfs_search_slot") however this
optimisation is really used in only one place - btrfs_search_slot.

Just open code the optimisation and also add a comment explaining how it
works since it's not clear just by looking at the code - the key point
here is it depends on an internal invariant that BTRFS' btree provides,
namely intermediate pointers always contain the key at slot0 at the
child node. So in the case of exact match we can safely assume that the
given key will always be in slot 0 on lower levels.

Furthermore this results in a reduction of btrfs_search_slot's size:

./scripts/bloat-o-meter ctree.orig fs/btrfs/ctree.o
add/remove: 0/0 grow/shrink: 0/1 up/down: 0/-75 (-75)
Function old new delta
btrfs_search_slot 2783 2708 -75
Total: Before=50423, After=50348, chg -0.15%

Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...

btrfs: rename BTRFS_ROOT_REF_COWS to BTRFS_ROOT_SHAREABLE

The name BTRFS_ROOT_REF_COWS is not very clear about the meaning.

In fact, that bit can only be set to those trees:

- Subvolume roots
- Da

btrfs: rename BTRFS_ROOT_REF_COWS to BTRFS_ROOT_SHAREABLE

The name BTRFS_ROOT_REF_COWS is not very clear about the meaning.

In fact, that bit can only be set to those trees:

- Subvolume roots
- Data reloc root
- Reloc roots for above roots

All other trees won't get this bit set. So just by the result, it is
obvious that, roots with this bit set can have tree blocks shared with
other trees. Either shared by snapshots, or by reloc roots (an special
snapshot created by relocation).

This patch will rename BTRFS_ROOT_REF_COWS to BTRFS_ROOT_SHAREABLE to
make it easier to understand, and update all comment mentioning
"reference counted" to follow the rename.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...

btrfs: speed up and simplify generic_bin_search

The bin search jumps over the extent buffer item keys, comparing
directly the bytes if the key is in one page, or storing it in a
temporary buffer in

btrfs: speed up and simplify generic_bin_search

The bin search jumps over the extent buffer item keys, comparing
directly the bytes if the key is in one page, or storing it in a
temporary buffer in case it spans two pages.

The mapping start and length are obtained from map_private_extent_buffer,
which is heavy weight compared to what we need. We know the key size and
can find out the eb page in a simple way. For keys spanning two pages
the fallback read_extent_buffer is used.

The temporary variables are reduced and moved to the scope of use.

Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...

btrfs: don't use set/get token in leaf_space_used

The token is supposed to cache the last page used by the set/get
helpers. In leaf_space_used the first and last items are accessed, it's
not likely

btrfs: don't use set/get token in leaf_space_used

The token is supposed to cache the last page used by the set/get
helpers. In leaf_space_used the first and last items are accessed, it's
not likely they'd be on the same page so there's some overhead caused
updating the token address but not using it.

Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...

btrfs: drop eb parameter from set/get token helpers

Now that all set/get helpers use the eb from the token, we don't need to
pass it to many btrfs_token_*/btrfs_set_token_* helpers, saving some
stac

btrfs: drop eb parameter from set/get token helpers

Now that all set/get helpers use the eb from the token, we don't need to
pass it to many btrfs_token_*/btrfs_set_token_* helpers, saving some
stack space.

Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...

btrfs: remove the redundant parameter level in btrfs_bin_search()

All callers pass the eb::level so we can get read it directly inside the
btrfs_bin_search and key_search.

This is inspired by the w

btrfs: remove the redundant parameter level in btrfs_bin_search()

All callers pass the eb::level so we can get read it directly inside the
btrfs_bin_search and key_search.

This is inspired by the work of Marek in U-boot.

CC: Marek Behun <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...