btrfs: fix data race at btrfs_use_block_rsv() when accessing block reserve

[ Upstream commit c7bb26b847e5b97814f522686068c5628e2b3646 ]

At btrfs_use_block_rsv() we read the size of a block reserve

btrfs: fix data race at btrfs_use_block_rsv() when accessing block reserve

[ Upstream commit c7bb26b847e5b97814f522686068c5628e2b3646 ]

At btrfs_use_block_rsv() we read the size of a block reserve without
locking its spinlock, which makes KCSAN complain because the size of a
block reserve is always updated while holding its spinlock. The report
from KCSAN is the following:

[653.313148] BUG: KCSAN: data-race in btrfs_update_delayed_refs_rsv [btrfs] / btrfs_use_block_rsv [btrfs]

[653.314755] read to 0x000000017f5871b8 of 8 bytes by task 7519 on cpu 0:
[653.314779] btrfs_use_block_rsv+0xe4/0x2f8 [btrfs]
[653.315606] btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0xdc/0x998 [btrfs]
[653.316421] btrfs_force_cow_block+0x220/0xe38 [btrfs]
[653.317242] btrfs_cow_block+0x1ac/0x568 [btrfs]
[653.318060] btrfs_search_slot+0xda2/0x19b8 [btrfs]
[653.318879] btrfs_del_csums+0x1dc/0x798 [btrfs]
[653.319702] __btrfs_free_extent.isra.0+0xc24/0x2028 [btrfs]
[653.320538] __btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0xd3c/0x2390 [btrfs]
[653.321340] btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0xae/0x290 [btrfs]
[653.322140] flush_space+0x5e4/0x718 [btrfs]
[653.322958] btrfs_preempt_reclaim_metadata_space+0x102/0x2f8 [btrfs]
[653.323781] process_one_work+0x3b6/0x838
[653.323800] worker_thread+0x75e/0xb10
[653.323817] kthread+0x21a/0x230
[653.323836] __ret_from_fork+0x6c/0xb8
[653.323855] ret_from_fork+0xa/0x30

[653.323887] write to 0x000000017f5871b8 of 8 bytes by task 576 on cpu 3:
[653.323906] btrfs_update_delayed_refs_rsv+0x1a4/0x250 [btrfs]
[653.324699] btrfs_add_delayed_data_ref+0x468/0x6d8 [btrfs]
[653.325494] btrfs_free_extent+0x76/0x120 [btrfs]
[653.326280] __btrfs_mod_ref+0x6a8/0x6b8 [btrfs]
[653.327064] btrfs_dec_ref+0x50/0x70 [btrfs]
[653.327849] walk_up_proc+0x236/0xa50 [btrfs]
[653.328633] walk_up_tree+0x21c/0x448 [btrfs]
[653.329418] btrfs_drop_snapshot+0x802/0x1328 [btrfs]
[653.330205] btrfs_clean_one_deleted_snapshot+0x184/0x238 [btrfs]
[653.330995] cleaner_kthread+0x2b0/0x2f0 [btrfs]
[653.331781] kthread+0x21a/0x230
[653.331800] __ret_from_fork+0x6c/0xb8
[653.331818] ret_from_fork+0xa/0x30

So add a helper to get the size of a block reserve while holding the lock.
Reading the field while holding the lock instead of using the data_race()
annotation is used in order to prevent load tearing.

Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

show more ...

btrfs: account block group tree when calculating global reserve size

When using the block group tree feature, this tree is a critical tree just
like the extent, csum and free space trees, and just l

btrfs: account block group tree when calculating global reserve size

When using the block group tree feature, this tree is a critical tree just
like the extent, csum and free space trees, and just like them it uses the
delayed refs block reserve.

So take into account the block group tree, and its current size, when
calculating the size for the global reserve.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...

btrfs: move btrfs_check_trunc_cache_free_space into block-rsv.c

This is completely related to block rsv's, move it out of the free space
cache code and into block-rsv.c.

Reviewed-by: Johannes Thums

btrfs: move btrfs_check_trunc_cache_free_space into block-rsv.c

This is completely related to block rsv's, move it out of the free space
cache code and into block-rsv.c.

Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...

btrfs: don't free qgroup space unless specified

Boris noticed in his simple quotas testing that he was getting a leak
with Sweet Tea's change to subvol create that stopped doing a
transaction commit

btrfs: don't free qgroup space unless specified

Boris noticed in his simple quotas testing that he was getting a leak
with Sweet Tea's change to subvol create that stopped doing a
transaction commit. This was just a side effect of that change.

In the delayed inode code we have an optimization that will free extra
reservations if we think we can pack a dir item into an already modified
leaf. Previously this wouldn't be triggered in the subvolume create
case because we'd commit the transaction, it was still possible but
much harder to trigger. It could actually be triggered if we did a
mkdir && subvol create with qgroups enabled.

This occurs because in btrfs_insert_delayed_dir_index(), which gets
called when we're adding the dir item, we do the following:

btrfs_block_rsv_release(fs_info, trans->block_rsv, bytes, NULL);

if we're able to skip reserving space.

The problem here is that trans->block_rsv points at the temporary block
rsv for the subvolume create, which has qgroup reservations in the block
rsv.

This is a problem because btrfs_block_rsv_release() will do the
following:

if (block_rsv->qgroup_rsv_reserved >= block_rsv->qgroup_rsv_size) {
qgroup_to_release = block_rsv->qgroup_rsv_reserved -
block_rsv->qgroup_rsv_size;
block_rsv->qgroup_rsv_reserved = block_rsv->qgroup_rsv_size;
}

The temporary block rsv just has ->qgroup_rsv_reserved set,
->qgroup_rsv_size == 0. The optimization in
btrfs_insert_delayed_dir_index() sets ->qgroup_rsv_reserved = 0. Then
later on when we call btrfs_subvolume_release_metadata() which has

btrfs_block_rsv_release(fs_info, rsv, (u64)-1, &qgroup_to_release);
btrfs_qgroup_convert_reserved_meta(root, qgroup_to_release);

qgroup_to_release is set to 0, and we do not convert the reserved
metadata space.

The problem here is that the block rsv code has been unconditionally
messing with ->qgroup_rsv_reserved, because the main place this is used
is delalloc, and any time we call btrfs_block_rsv_release() we do it
with qgroup_to_release set, and thus do the proper accounting.

The subvolume code is the only other code that uses the qgroup
reservation stuff, but it's intermingled with the above optimization,
and thus was getting its reservation freed out from underneath it and
thus leaking the reserved space.

The solution is to simply not mess with the qgroup reservations if we
don't have qgroup_to_release set. This works with the existing code as
anything that messes with the delalloc reservations always have
qgroup_to_release set. This fixes the leak that Boris was observing.

Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...

btrfs: calculate the right space for delayed refs when updating global reserve

When updating the global block reserve, we account for the 6 items needed
by an unlink operation and the 6 delayed refe

btrfs: calculate the right space for delayed refs when updating global reserve

When updating the global block reserve, we account for the 6 items needed
by an unlink operation and the 6 delayed references for each one of those
items. However the calculation for the delayed references is not correct
in case we have the free space tree enabled, as in that case we need to
touch the free space tree as well and therefore need twice the number of
bytes. So use the btrfs_calc_delayed_ref_bytes() helper to calculate the
number of bytes need for the delayed references at
btrfs_update_global_block_rsv().

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...

btrfs: use a constant for the number of metadata units needed for an unlink

Instead of hard coding the number of metadata units for an unlink operation
in a couple places, define a macro and use it

btrfs: use a constant for the number of metadata units needed for an unlink

Instead of hard coding the number of metadata units for an unlink operation
in a couple places, define a macro and use it instead. This eliminates the
problem of one place getting out of sync with the other, such as recently
fixed by the previous patch in the series ("btrfs: fix calculation of the
global block reserve's size").

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...

btrfs: fix calculation of the global block reserve's size

At btrfs_update_global_block_rsv(), we are assuming an unlink operation
uses 5 metadata units, but that's not true anymore, it uses 6 since

btrfs: fix calculation of the global block reserve's size

At btrfs_update_global_block_rsv(), we are assuming an unlink operation
uses 5 metadata units, but that's not true anymore, it uses 6 since the
commit bca4ad7c0b54 ("btrfs: reserve correct number of items for unlink
and rmdir"). So update the code and comments to consider 6 units.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...

btrfs: simplify variables in btrfs_block_rsv_refill()

At btrfs_block_rsv_refill(), there's no point in initializing the
'num_bytes' variable to 0 and then, after taking the block reserve's
spinlock,

btrfs: simplify variables in btrfs_block_rsv_refill()

At btrfs_block_rsv_refill(), there's no point in initializing the
'num_bytes' variable to 0 and then, after taking the block reserve's
spinlock, initializing it to the value of the 'min_reserved' parameter.

So just get rid of the 'num_bytes' local variable and rename the
'min_reserved' parameter to 'num_bytes'.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...

btrfs: remove check for NULL block reserve at btrfs_block_rsv_check()

The block reserve passed to btrfs_block_rsv_check() is never NULL, so
remove the check. In case it can ever become NULL in the f

btrfs: remove check for NULL block reserve at btrfs_block_rsv_check()

The block reserve passed to btrfs_block_rsv_check() is never NULL, so
remove the check. In case it can ever become NULL in the future, then
we'll get a pretty obvious and clear NULL pointer dereference crash and
stack trace.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...

btrfs: simplify percent calculation helpers, rename div_factor

The div_factor* helpers calculate fraction or percentage fraction. The
name is a bit confusing, we use it only for percentage calculati

btrfs: simplify percent calculation helpers, rename div_factor

The div_factor* helpers calculate fraction or percentage fraction. The
name is a bit confusing, we use it only for percentage calculations and
there are two helpers.

There's a helper mult_frac that's for general fractions, that tries to
be accurate but we multiply and divide by small numbers so we can use
the div_u64 helper.

Rename the div_factor* helpers and use 1..100 percentage range, also drop
the case checking for percentage == 100, it's never hit.

The conversions:

* div_factor calculates tenths and the numbers need to be adjusted
* div_factor_fine is direct replacement

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...

btrfs: remove unused btrfs_cond_migrate_bytes

The last user of this was removed in 7f9fe6144076 ("btrfs: improve
global reserve stealing logic"), drop this code as it's no longer called
by anybody.

btrfs: remove unused btrfs_cond_migrate_bytes

The last user of this was removed in 7f9fe6144076 ("btrfs: improve
global reserve stealing logic"), drop this code as it's no longer called
by anybody.

Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...

btrfs: move accessor helpers into accessors.h

This is a large patch, but because they're all macros it's impossible to
split up. Simply copy all of the item accessors in ctree.h and paste
them in a

btrfs: move accessor helpers into accessors.h

This is a large patch, but because they're all macros it's impossible to
split up. Simply copy all of the item accessors in ctree.h and paste
them in accessors.h, and then update any files to include the header so
everything compiles.

Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[ reformat comments, style fixups ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...

btrfs: move mount option definitions to fs.h

These are fs wide definitions and helpers, move them out of ctree.h and
into fs.h.

Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed

btrfs: move mount option definitions to fs.h

These are fs wide definitions and helpers, move them out of ctree.h and
into fs.h.

Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...

btrfs: introduce BTRFS_RESERVE_FLUSH_EMERGENCY

Inside of FB, as well as some user reports, we've had a consistent
problem of occasional ENOSPC transaction aborts. Inside FB we were
seeing ~100-200

btrfs: introduce BTRFS_RESERVE_FLUSH_EMERGENCY

Inside of FB, as well as some user reports, we've had a consistent
problem of occasional ENOSPC transaction aborts. Inside FB we were
seeing ~100-200 ENOSPC aborts per day in the fleet, which is a really
low occurrence rate given the size of our fleet, but it's not nothing.

There are two causes of this particular problem.

First is delayed allocation. The reservation system for delalloc
assumes that contiguous dirty ranges will result in 1 file extent item.
However if there is memory pressure that results in fragmented writeout,
or there is fragmentation in the block groups, this won't necessarily be
true. Consider the case where we do a single 256MiB write to a file and
then close it. We will have 1 reservation for the inode update, the
reservations for the checksum updates, and 1 reservation for the file
extent item. At some point later we decide to write this entire range
out, but we're so fragmented that we break this into 100 different file
extents. Since we've already closed the file and are no longer writing
to it there's nothing to trigger a refill of the delalloc block rsv to
satisfy the 99 new file extent reservations we need. At this point we
exhaust our delalloc reservation, and we begin to steal from the global
reserve. If you have enough of these cases going in parallel you can
easily exhaust the global reserve, get an ENOSPC at
btrfs_alloc_tree_block() time, and then abort the transaction.

The other case is the delayed refs reserve. The delayed refs reserve
updates its size based on outstanding delayed refs and dirty block
groups. However we only refill this block reserve when returning
excess reservations and when we call btrfs_start_transaction(root, X).
We will reserve 2*X credits at transaction start time, and fill in X
into the delayed refs reserve to make sure it stays topped off.
Generally this works well, but clearly has downsides. If we do a
particularly delayed ref heavy operation we may never catch up in our
reservations. Additionally running delayed refs generates more delayed
refs, and at that point we may be committing the transaction and have no
way to trigger a refill of our delayed refs rsv. Then a similar thing
occurs with the delalloc reserve.

Generally speaking we well over-reserve in all of our block rsvs. If we
reserve 1 credit we're usually reserving around 264k of space, but we'll
often not use any of that reservation, or use a few blocks of that
reservation. We can be reasonably sure that as long as you were able to
reserve space up front for your operation you'll be able to find space
on disk for that reservation.

So introduce a new flushing state, BTRFS_RESERVE_FLUSH_EMERGENCY. This
gets used in the case that we've exhausted our reserve and the global
reserve. It simply forces a reservation if we have enough actual space
on disk to make the reservation, which is almost always the case. This
keeps us from hitting ENOSPC aborts in these odd occurrences where we've
not kept up with the delayed work.

Fixing this in a complete way is going to be relatively complicated and
time consuming. This patch is what I discussed with Filipe earlier this
year, and what I put into our kernels inside FB. With this patch we're
down to 1-2 ENOSPC aborts per week, which is a significant reduction.
This is a decent stop gap until we can work out a more wholistic
solution to these two corner cases.

Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...

btrfs: add KCSAN annotations for unlocked access to block_rsv->full

KCSAN reports that there's unlocked access mixed with locked access,
which is technically correct but is not a bug. To avoid fals

btrfs: add KCSAN annotations for unlocked access to block_rsv->full

KCSAN reports that there's unlocked access mixed with locked access,
which is technically correct but is not a bug. To avoid false alerts at
least from KCSAN, add annotation and use a wrapper whenever ->full is
accessed for read outside of lock.

It is used as a fast check and only advisory. In the worst case the
block reserve is found !full and becomes full in the meantime, but
properly handled.

Depending on the value of ->full, btrfs_block_rsv_release decides
where to return the reservation, and block_rsv_release_bytes handles a
NULL pointer for block_rsv and if it's not NULL then it double checks
the full status under a lock.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CAAwBoOJDjei5Hnem155N_cJwiEkVwJYvgN-tQrwWbZQGhFU=cA@mail.gmail.com/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/YvHU/vsXd7uz5V6j@hungrycats.org
Reported-by: Zygo Blaxell <ce3g8jdj@umail.furryterror.org>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...

btrfs: don't save block group root into super block

The extent tree v2 needs a new root for storing all block group items,
the whole feature hasn't been finished yet so we can afford to do some
chan

btrfs: don't save block group root into super block

The extent tree v2 needs a new root for storing all block group items,
the whole feature hasn't been finished yet so we can afford to do some
changes.

My initial proposal years ago just added a new tree rootid, and load it
from tree root, just like what we did for quota/free space tree/uuid/extent
roots.

But the extent tree v2 patches introduced a completely new way to store
block group tree root into super block which is arguably wasteful.

Currently there are only 3 trees stored in super blocks, and they all
have their valid reasons:

- Chunk root
Needed for bootstrap.

- Tree root
Really the entry point for all trees.

- Log root
This is special as log root has to be updated out of existing
transaction mechanism.

There is not even any reason to put block group root into super blocks,
the block group tree is updated at the same time as the old extent tree,
no need for extra bootstrap/out-of-transaction update.

So just move block group root from super block into tree root.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...

btrfs: use enum for btrfs_block_rsv::type

The number of block group reserve types BTRFS_BLOCK_RSV_* is small and
fits to u8 and there's enough left in case we want to add more.
For type safety use t

btrfs: use enum for btrfs_block_rsv::type

The number of block group reserve types BTRFS_BLOCK_RSV_* is small and
fits to u8 and there's enough left in case we want to add more.
For type safety use the enum but make it 8 bits in the structure to save
space.

The structure size is now 48 on release build, making a slight
improvement in structures where it's embedded, like btrfs_fs_info or
btrfs_inode.

Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...

btrfs: switch btrfs_block_rsv::full to bool

Use simple bool type for the block reserve full status, there's short to
save space as there used to be int but there's no reason for that.

Reviewed-by:

btrfs: switch btrfs_block_rsv::full to bool

Use simple bool type for the block reserve full status, there's short to
save space as there used to be int but there's no reason for that.

Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...

btrfs: reserve extra space for the free space tree

Filipe reported a problem where sometimes he'd get an ENOSPC abort when
running delayed refs with generic/619 and the free space tree enabled.
This

btrfs: reserve extra space for the free space tree

Filipe reported a problem where sometimes he'd get an ENOSPC abort when
running delayed refs with generic/619 and the free space tree enabled.
This is partly because we do not reserve space for modifying the free
space tree, nor do we have a block rsv associated with that tree.

The delayed_refs_rsv tracks the amount of space required to run delayed
refs. This means 1 modification means 1 change to the extent root.
With the free space tree this turns into 2 changes, because modifying 1
extent means updating the extent tree and potentially updating the free
space tree to either remove that entry or add the free space. Thus if
we have the FST enabled, simply double the reservation size for our
modification.

Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...

btrfs: include the free space tree in the global rsv minimum calculation

Filipe reported a problem where generic/619 was failing with an ENOSPC
abort while running delayed refs, like the following

btrfs: include the free space tree in the global rsv minimum calculation

Filipe reported a problem where generic/619 was failing with an ENOSPC
abort while running delayed refs, like the following

BTRFS: Transaction aborted (error -28)
WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 522920 at fs/btrfs/free-space-tree.c:1049 add_to_free_space_tree+0xe5/0x110 [btrfs]
CPU: 3 PID: 522920 Comm: kworker/u16:19 Tainted: G W 5.16.0-rc2-btrfs-next-106 #1
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
Workqueue: events_unbound btrfs_async_reclaim_metadata_space [btrfs]
RIP: 0010:add_to_free_space_tree+0xe5/0x110 [btrfs]
RSP: 0000:ffffa65087fb7b20 EFLAGS: 00010282
RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000001000 RCX: 0000000000000000
RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: ffffffff9131eeaa RDI: 00000000ffffffff
RBP: ffff8d62e26481b8 R08: ffffffff9ad97ce0 R09: 0000000000000001
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: 00000000ffffffe4
R13: ffff8d61c25fe688 R14: ffff8d61ebd88800 R15: ffff8d61ebd88a90
FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8d64ed400000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 00007fa46a8b1000 CR3: 0000000148d18003 CR4: 0000000000370ee0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Call Trace:
<TASK>
__btrfs_free_extent+0x516/0x950 [btrfs]
__btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0x2b1/0x1250 [btrfs]
btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0x86/0x210 [btrfs]
flush_space+0x403/0x630 [btrfs]
? call_rcu_tasks_generic+0x50/0x80
? lock_release+0x223/0x4a0
? btrfs_get_alloc_profile+0xb5/0x290 [btrfs]
? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x4b/0xa0
btrfs_async_reclaim_metadata_space+0x139/0x320 [btrfs]
process_one_work+0x24c/0x5b0
worker_thread+0x55/0x3c0
? process_one_work+0x5b0/0x5b0
kthread+0x17c/0x1a0
? set_kthread_struct+0x40/0x40
ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30

There's a couple of reasons for this, but in generic/619's case the
largest reason is because it is a very small file system, ad we do not
reserve enough space for the global reserve.

With the free space tree we now have the free space tree that we need to
modify when running delayed refs. This means we need the global reserve
to take this into account when it calculates the minimum size it needs
to be. This is especially important for very small file systems.

Fix this by adjusting the minimum global block rsv size math to include
the size of the free space tree when calculating the size.

Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...

btrfs: stop accessing ->csum_root directly

We are going to have multiple csum roots in the future, so convert all
users of ->csum_root to btrfs_csum_root() and rename ->csum_root to
->_csum_root so

btrfs: stop accessing ->csum_root directly

We are going to have multiple csum roots in the future, so convert all
users of ->csum_root to btrfs_csum_root() and rename ->csum_root to
->_csum_root so we can easily find remaining users in the future.

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...

btrfs: stop accessing ->extent_root directly

When we start having multiple extent roots we'll need to use a helper to
get to the correct extent_root. Rename fs_info->extent_root to
_extent_root and

btrfs: stop accessing ->extent_root directly

When we start having multiple extent roots we'll need to use a helper to
get to the correct extent_root. Rename fs_info->extent_root to
_extent_root and convert all of the users of the extent root to using
the btrfs_extent_root() helper. This will allow us to easily clean up
the remaining direct accesses in the future.

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...

btrfs: init root block_rsv at init root time

In the future we're going to have multiple csum and extent root trees,
so init the roots block_rsv at setup_root time based on their root key
objectid.

btrfs: init root block_rsv at init root time

In the future we're going to have multiple csum and extent root trees,
so init the roots block_rsv at setup_root time based on their root key
objectid.

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...

btrfs: change root to fs_info for btrfs_reserve_metadata_bytes

We used to need the root for btrfs_reserve_metadata_bytes to check the
orphan cleanup state, but we no longer need that, we simply need

btrfs: change root to fs_info for btrfs_reserve_metadata_bytes

We used to need the root for btrfs_reserve_metadata_bytes to check the
orphan cleanup state, but we no longer need that, we simply need the
fs_info. Change btrfs_reserve_metadata_bytes() to use the fs_info, and
change both btrfs_block_rsv_refill() and btrfs_block_rsv_add() to do the
same as they simply call btrfs_reserve_metadata_bytes() and then
manipulate the block_rsv that is being used.

Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...

btrfs: introduce mount option rescue=ignorebadroots

In the face of extent root corruption, or any other core fs wide root
corruption we will fail to mount the file system. This makes recovery
kind

btrfs: introduce mount option rescue=ignorebadroots

In the face of extent root corruption, or any other core fs wide root
corruption we will fail to mount the file system. This makes recovery
kind of a pain, because you need to fall back to userspace tools to
scrape off data. Instead provide a mechanism to gracefully handle bad
roots, so we can at least mount read-only and possibly recover data from
the file system.

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...