|
Revision tags: v6.6.25, v6.6.24, v6.6.23, v6.6.16, v6.6.15, v6.6.14, v6.6.13, v6.6.12, v6.6.11, v6.6.10, v6.6.9, v6.6.8, v6.6.7, v6.6.6, v6.6.5, v6.6.4, v6.6.3, v6.6.2, v6.5.11, v6.6.1, v6.5.10, v6.6, v6.5.9, v6.5.8, v6.5.7, v6.5.6, v6.5.5, v6.5.4, v6.5.3, v6.5.2, v6.1.51, v6.5.1, v6.1.50, v6.5, v6.1.49, v6.1.48, v6.1.46, v6.1.45, v6.1.44, v6.1.43, v6.1.42, v6.1.41, v6.1.40, v6.1.39, v6.1.38, v6.1.37, v6.1.36, v6.4, v6.1.35, v6.1.34, v6.1.33, v6.1.32, v6.1.31, v6.1.30, v6.1.29, v6.1.28, v6.1.27, v6.1.26, v6.3, v6.1.25, v6.1.24, v6.1.23, v6.1.22, v6.1.21, v6.1.20, v6.1.19, v6.1.18, v6.1.17, v6.1.16, v6.1.15, v6.1.14, v6.1.13, v6.2, v6.1.12, v6.1.11, v6.1.10, v6.1.9, v6.1.8, v6.1.7, v6.1.6, v6.1.5, v6.0.19, v6.0.18, v6.1.4, v6.1.3, v6.0.17, v6.1.2, v6.0.16, v6.1.1, v6.0.15, v6.0.14, v6.0.13, v6.1, v6.0.12, v6.0.11, v6.0.10, v5.15.80, v6.0.9, v5.15.79 |
|
| #
6c0eb5ba |
| 13-Nov-2022 |
Dawei Li <set_pte_at@outlook.com> |
ACPI: make remove callback of ACPI driver void
For bus-based driver, device removal is implemented as:
1 device_remove()->
2 bus->remove()->
3 driver->remove()
Driver core needs no inform fro
ACPI: make remove callback of ACPI driver void
For bus-based driver, device removal is implemented as:
1 device_remove()->
2 bus->remove()->
3 driver->remove()
Driver core needs no inform from callee(bus driver) about the
result of remove callback. In that case, commit fc7a6209d571
("bus: Make remove callback return void") forces bus_type::remove
be void-returned.
Now we have the situation that both 1 & 2 of calling chain are
void-returned, so it does not make much sense for 3(driver->remove)
to return non-void to its caller.
So the basic idea behind this change is making remove() callback of
any bus-based driver to be void-returned.
This change, for itself, is for device drivers based on acpi-bus.
Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dawei Li <set_pte_at@outlook.com>
Reviewed-by: Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@gmail.com> # for drivers/platform/surface/*
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: v6.0.8, v5.15.78, v6.0.7, v5.15.77, v5.15.76, v6.0.6, v6.0.5, v5.15.75, v6.0.4, v6.0.3, v6.0.2, v5.15.74, v5.15.73, v6.0.1, v5.15.72, v6.0, v5.15.71, v5.15.70, v5.15.69, v5.15.68, v5.15.67, v5.15.66, v5.15.65, v5.15.64, v5.15.63, v5.15.62, v5.15.61, v5.15.60, v5.15.59, v5.19, v5.15.58, v5.15.57, v5.15.56, v5.15.55, v5.15.54, v5.15.53, v5.15.52, v5.15.51, v5.15.50, v5.15.49, v5.15.48, v5.15.47, v5.15.46, v5.15.45, v5.15.44, v5.15.43, v5.15.42, v5.18, v5.15.41, v5.15.40, v5.15.39, v5.15.38, v5.15.37, v5.15.36, v5.15.35, v5.15.34, v5.15.33, v5.15.32, v5.15.31, v5.17, v5.15.30, v5.15.29, v5.15.28, v5.15.27, v5.15.26, v5.15.25, v5.15.24, v5.15.23, v5.15.22, v5.15.21, v5.15.20, v5.15.19, v5.15.18, v5.15.17, v5.4.173, v5.15.16, v5.15.15, v5.16, v5.15.10, v5.15.9, v5.15.8, v5.15.7, v5.15.6, v5.15.5, v5.15.4, v5.15.3, v5.15.2, v5.15.1, v5.15, v5.14.14, v5.14.13, v5.14.12, v5.14.11, v5.14.10, v5.14.9, v5.14.8, v5.14.7, v5.14.6, v5.10.67, v5.10.66, v5.14.5, v5.14.4, v5.10.65, v5.14.3, v5.10.64, v5.14.2, v5.10.63, v5.14.1, v5.10.62, v5.14, v5.10.61, v5.10.60, v5.10.53, v5.10.52, v5.10.51, v5.10.50, v5.10.49, v5.13, v5.10.46, v5.10.43, v5.10.42, v5.10.41, v5.10.40, v5.10.39, v5.4.119, v5.10.36, v5.10.35, v5.10.34, v5.4.116, v5.10.33, v5.12, v5.10.32, v5.10.31, v5.10.30, v5.10.27, v5.10.26, v5.10.25, v5.10.24, v5.10.23, v5.10.22, v5.10.21, v5.10.20, v5.10.19, v5.4.101 |
|
| #
24789075 |
| 24-Feb-2021 |
Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> |
platform: x86: ACPI: Get rid of ACPICA message printing
A few x86 platform drivers use ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT() or ACPI_EXCEPTION()
for printing messages, but that is questionable, because those macros
be
platform: x86: ACPI: Get rid of ACPICA message printing
A few x86 platform drivers use ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT() or ACPI_EXCEPTION()
for printing messages, but that is questionable, because those macros
belong to ACPICA and they should not be used elsewhere. In addition,
ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT() requires special enabling to allow it to actually
print the message, which is a nuisance, and the _COMPONENT symbol
generally needed for that is not defined in any of the files in
question.
For this reason, replace the ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT() in lg-laptop.c with
pr_debug() and the one in xo15-ebook.c with acpi_handle_debug()
(with the additional benefit that the source object can be identified
more easily after this change).
Also drop the ACPI_MODULE_NAME() definitions that are only used by
the ACPICA message printing macros from those files and from wmi.c
and surfacepro3_button.c (while at it).
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/2074665.VPHYfYaQb6@kreacher
[hdegoede@redhat.com: Drop acer-wmi.c chunk, a similar patch was already merged]
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: v5.10.18, v5.10.17, v5.11, v5.10.16, v5.10.15, v5.10.14, v5.10, v5.8.17, v5.8.16, v5.8.15, v5.9 |
|
| #
411269ba |
| 09-Oct-2020 |
Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@gmail.com> |
platform/surface: Move Surface Pro 3 Button driver to platform/surface
Move the Surface Pro 3 Button driver from platform/x86 to the newly
created platform/surface directory.
Signed-off-by: Maximil
platform/surface: Move Surface Pro 3 Button driver to platform/surface
Move the Surface Pro 3 Button driver from platform/x86 to the newly
created platform/surface directory.
Signed-off-by: Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201009141128.683254-6-luzmaximilian@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
show more ...
|