|
Revision tags: v6.6.25, v6.6.24, v6.6.23, v6.6.16, v6.6.15, v6.6.14, v6.6.13, v6.6.12, v6.6.11, v6.6.10, v6.6.9, v6.6.8, v6.6.7, v6.6.6, v6.6.5, v6.6.4, v6.6.3, v6.6.2, v6.5.11, v6.6.1, v6.5.10, v6.6, v6.5.9, v6.5.8, v6.5.7, v6.5.6, v6.5.5, v6.5.4, v6.5.3, v6.5.2, v6.1.51, v6.5.1, v6.1.50, v6.5, v6.1.49, v6.1.48, v6.1.46, v6.1.45, v6.1.44, v6.1.43, v6.1.42, v6.1.41, v6.1.40, v6.1.39, v6.1.38, v6.1.37, v6.1.36, v6.4, v6.1.35, v6.1.34, v6.1.33, v6.1.32, v6.1.31, v6.1.30, v6.1.29, v6.1.28, v6.1.27, v6.1.26, v6.3, v6.1.25, v6.1.24, v6.1.23, v6.1.22, v6.1.21, v6.1.20, v6.1.19, v6.1.18, v6.1.17, v6.1.16, v6.1.15, v6.1.14, v6.1.13, v6.2, v6.1.12, v6.1.11, v6.1.10, v6.1.9, v6.1.8, v6.1.7, v6.1.6, v6.1.5, v6.0.19, v6.0.18, v6.1.4, v6.1.3, v6.0.17, v6.1.2, v6.0.16, v6.1.1, v6.0.15, v6.0.14, v6.0.13, v6.1, v6.0.12, v6.0.11, v6.0.10, v5.15.80, v6.0.9, v5.15.79 |
|
| #
d9a477f6 |
| 13-Nov-2022 |
Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@gmail.com> |
platform/surface: aggregator: Do not check for repeated unsequenced packets
Currently, we check any received packet whether we have already seen it
previously, regardless of the packet type (sequenc
platform/surface: aggregator: Do not check for repeated unsequenced packets
Currently, we check any received packet whether we have already seen it
previously, regardless of the packet type (sequenced / unsequenced). We
do this by checking the sequence number. This assumes that sequence
numbers are valid for both sequenced and unsequenced packets. However,
this assumption appears to be incorrect.
On some devices, the sequence number field of unsequenced packets (in
particular HID input events on the Surface Pro 9) is always zero. As a
result, the current retransmission check kicks in and discards all but
the first unsequenced packet, breaking (among other things) keyboard and
touchpad input.
Note that we have, so far, only seen packets being retransmitted in
sequenced communication. In particular, this happens when there is an
ACK timeout, causing the EC (or us) to re-send the packet waiting for an
ACK. Arguably, retransmission / duplication of unsequenced packets
should not be an issue as there is no logical condition (such as an ACK
timeout) to determine when a packet should be sent again.
Therefore, remove the retransmission check for unsequenced packets
entirely to resolve the issue.
Fixes: c167b9c7e3d6 ("platform/surface: Add Surface Aggregator subsystem")
Signed-off-by: Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221113185951.224759-1-luzmaximilian@gmail.com
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: v6.0.8, v5.15.78, v6.0.7, v5.15.77, v5.15.76, v6.0.6, v6.0.5, v5.15.75, v6.0.4, v6.0.3, v6.0.2, v5.15.74, v5.15.73, v6.0.1, v5.15.72, v6.0, v5.15.71, v5.15.70, v5.15.69, v5.15.68, v5.15.67, v5.15.66, v5.15.65, v5.15.64, v5.15.63, v5.15.62, v5.15.61, v5.15.60, v5.15.59, v5.19, v5.15.58, v5.15.57, v5.15.56, v5.15.55, v5.15.54, v5.15.53, v5.15.52, v5.15.51, v5.15.50 |
|
| #
221756e6 |
| 24-Jun-2022 |
Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@gmail.com> |
platform/surface: Update copyright year of various drivers
Update the copyright of various Surface drivers to the current year.
Signed-off-by: Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@gmail.com>
Link: https:/
platform/surface: Update copyright year of various drivers
Update the copyright of various Surface drivers to the current year.
Signed-off-by: Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220624205800.1355621-4-luzmaximilian@gmail.com
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
show more ...
|
| #
d3233f4b |
| 13-Nov-2022 |
Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@gmail.com> |
platform/surface: aggregator: Do not check for repeated unsequenced packets
[ Upstream commit d9a477f643eb3de71fbea5ae6103b800ceb8f547 ]
Currently, we check any received packet whether we have alre
platform/surface: aggregator: Do not check for repeated unsequenced packets
[ Upstream commit d9a477f643eb3de71fbea5ae6103b800ceb8f547 ]
Currently, we check any received packet whether we have already seen it
previously, regardless of the packet type (sequenced / unsequenced). We
do this by checking the sequence number. This assumes that sequence
numbers are valid for both sequenced and unsequenced packets. However,
this assumption appears to be incorrect.
On some devices, the sequence number field of unsequenced packets (in
particular HID input events on the Surface Pro 9) is always zero. As a
result, the current retransmission check kicks in and discards all but
the first unsequenced packet, breaking (among other things) keyboard and
touchpad input.
Note that we have, so far, only seen packets being retransmitted in
sequenced communication. In particular, this happens when there is an
ACK timeout, causing the EC (or us) to re-send the packet waiting for an
ACK. Arguably, retransmission / duplication of unsequenced packets
should not be an issue as there is no logical condition (such as an ACK
timeout) to determine when a packet should be sent again.
Therefore, remove the retransmission check for unsequenced packets
entirely to resolve the issue.
Fixes: c167b9c7e3d6 ("platform/surface: Add Surface Aggregator subsystem")
Signed-off-by: Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221113185951.224759-1-luzmaximilian@gmail.com
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
show more ...
|
| #
d3233f4b |
| 13-Nov-2022 |
Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@gmail.com> |
platform/surface: aggregator: Do not check for repeated unsequenced packets
[ Upstream commit d9a477f643eb3de71fbea5ae6103b800ceb8f547 ]
Currently, we check any received packet whether we have alre
platform/surface: aggregator: Do not check for repeated unsequenced packets
[ Upstream commit d9a477f643eb3de71fbea5ae6103b800ceb8f547 ]
Currently, we check any received packet whether we have already seen it
previously, regardless of the packet type (sequenced / unsequenced). We
do this by checking the sequence number. This assumes that sequence
numbers are valid for both sequenced and unsequenced packets. However,
this assumption appears to be incorrect.
On some devices, the sequence number field of unsequenced packets (in
particular HID input events on the Surface Pro 9) is always zero. As a
result, the current retransmission check kicks in and discards all but
the first unsequenced packet, breaking (among other things) keyboard and
touchpad input.
Note that we have, so far, only seen packets being retransmitted in
sequenced communication. In particular, this happens when there is an
ACK timeout, causing the EC (or us) to re-send the packet waiting for an
ACK. Arguably, retransmission / duplication of unsequenced packets
should not be an issue as there is no logical condition (such as an ACK
timeout) to determine when a packet should be sent again.
Therefore, remove the retransmission check for unsequenced packets
entirely to resolve the issue.
Fixes: c167b9c7e3d6 ("platform/surface: Add Surface Aggregator subsystem")
Signed-off-by: Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221113185951.224759-1-luzmaximilian@gmail.com
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
show more ...
|
| #
d3233f4b |
| 13-Nov-2022 |
Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@gmail.com> |
platform/surface: aggregator: Do not check for repeated unsequenced packets
[ Upstream commit d9a477f643eb3de71fbea5ae6103b800ceb8f547 ]
Currently, we check any received packet whether we have alre
platform/surface: aggregator: Do not check for repeated unsequenced packets
[ Upstream commit d9a477f643eb3de71fbea5ae6103b800ceb8f547 ]
Currently, we check any received packet whether we have already seen it
previously, regardless of the packet type (sequenced / unsequenced). We
do this by checking the sequence number. This assumes that sequence
numbers are valid for both sequenced and unsequenced packets. However,
this assumption appears to be incorrect.
On some devices, the sequence number field of unsequenced packets (in
particular HID input events on the Surface Pro 9) is always zero. As a
result, the current retransmission check kicks in and discards all but
the first unsequenced packet, breaking (among other things) keyboard and
touchpad input.
Note that we have, so far, only seen packets being retransmitted in
sequenced communication. In particular, this happens when there is an
ACK timeout, causing the EC (or us) to re-send the packet waiting for an
ACK. Arguably, retransmission / duplication of unsequenced packets
should not be an issue as there is no logical condition (such as an ACK
timeout) to determine when a packet should be sent again.
Therefore, remove the retransmission check for unsequenced packets
entirely to resolve the issue.
Fixes: c167b9c7e3d6 ("platform/surface: Add Surface Aggregator subsystem")
Signed-off-by: Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221113185951.224759-1-luzmaximilian@gmail.com
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
show more ...
|
| #
d3233f4b |
| 13-Nov-2022 |
Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@gmail.com> |
platform/surface: aggregator: Do not check for repeated unsequenced packets
[ Upstream commit d9a477f643eb3de71fbea5ae6103b800ceb8f547 ]
Currently, we check any received packet whether we have alre
platform/surface: aggregator: Do not check for repeated unsequenced packets
[ Upstream commit d9a477f643eb3de71fbea5ae6103b800ceb8f547 ]
Currently, we check any received packet whether we have already seen it
previously, regardless of the packet type (sequenced / unsequenced). We
do this by checking the sequence number. This assumes that sequence
numbers are valid for both sequenced and unsequenced packets. However,
this assumption appears to be incorrect.
On some devices, the sequence number field of unsequenced packets (in
particular HID input events on the Surface Pro 9) is always zero. As a
result, the current retransmission check kicks in and discards all but
the first unsequenced packet, breaking (among other things) keyboard and
touchpad input.
Note that we have, so far, only seen packets being retransmitted in
sequenced communication. In particular, this happens when there is an
ACK timeout, causing the EC (or us) to re-send the packet waiting for an
ACK. Arguably, retransmission / duplication of unsequenced packets
should not be an issue as there is no logical condition (such as an ACK
timeout) to determine when a packet should be sent again.
Therefore, remove the retransmission check for unsequenced packets
entirely to resolve the issue.
Fixes: c167b9c7e3d6 ("platform/surface: Add Surface Aggregator subsystem")
Signed-off-by: Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221113185951.224759-1-luzmaximilian@gmail.com
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
show more ...
|
| #
d3233f4b |
| 13-Nov-2022 |
Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@gmail.com> |
platform/surface: aggregator: Do not check for repeated unsequenced packets
[ Upstream commit d9a477f643eb3de71fbea5ae6103b800ceb8f547 ]
Currently, we check any received packet whether we have alre
platform/surface: aggregator: Do not check for repeated unsequenced packets
[ Upstream commit d9a477f643eb3de71fbea5ae6103b800ceb8f547 ]
Currently, we check any received packet whether we have already seen it
previously, regardless of the packet type (sequenced / unsequenced). We
do this by checking the sequence number. This assumes that sequence
numbers are valid for both sequenced and unsequenced packets. However,
this assumption appears to be incorrect.
On some devices, the sequence number field of unsequenced packets (in
particular HID input events on the Surface Pro 9) is always zero. As a
result, the current retransmission check kicks in and discards all but
the first unsequenced packet, breaking (among other things) keyboard and
touchpad input.
Note that we have, so far, only seen packets being retransmitted in
sequenced communication. In particular, this happens when there is an
ACK timeout, causing the EC (or us) to re-send the packet waiting for an
ACK. Arguably, retransmission / duplication of unsequenced packets
should not be an issue as there is no logical condition (such as an ACK
timeout) to determine when a packet should be sent again.
Therefore, remove the retransmission check for unsequenced packets
entirely to resolve the issue.
Fixes: c167b9c7e3d6 ("platform/surface: Add Surface Aggregator subsystem")
Signed-off-by: Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221113185951.224759-1-luzmaximilian@gmail.com
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
show more ...
|
| #
d3233f4b |
| 13-Nov-2022 |
Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@gmail.com> |
platform/surface: aggregator: Do not check for repeated unsequenced packets
[ Upstream commit d9a477f643eb3de71fbea5ae6103b800ceb8f547 ]
Currently, we check any received packet whether we have alre
platform/surface: aggregator: Do not check for repeated unsequenced packets
[ Upstream commit d9a477f643eb3de71fbea5ae6103b800ceb8f547 ]
Currently, we check any received packet whether we have already seen it
previously, regardless of the packet type (sequenced / unsequenced). We
do this by checking the sequence number. This assumes that sequence
numbers are valid for both sequenced and unsequenced packets. However,
this assumption appears to be incorrect.
On some devices, the sequence number field of unsequenced packets (in
particular HID input events on the Surface Pro 9) is always zero. As a
result, the current retransmission check kicks in and discards all but
the first unsequenced packet, breaking (among other things) keyboard and
touchpad input.
Note that we have, so far, only seen packets being retransmitted in
sequenced communication. In particular, this happens when there is an
ACK timeout, causing the EC (or us) to re-send the packet waiting for an
ACK. Arguably, retransmission / duplication of unsequenced packets
should not be an issue as there is no logical condition (such as an ACK
timeout) to determine when a packet should be sent again.
Therefore, remove the retransmission check for unsequenced packets
entirely to resolve the issue.
Fixes: c167b9c7e3d6 ("platform/surface: Add Surface Aggregator subsystem")
Signed-off-by: Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221113185951.224759-1-luzmaximilian@gmail.com
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
show more ...
|
| #
d3233f4b |
| 13-Nov-2022 |
Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@gmail.com> |
platform/surface: aggregator: Do not check for repeated unsequenced packets
[ Upstream commit d9a477f643eb3de71fbea5ae6103b800ceb8f547 ]
Currently, we check any received packet whether we have alre
platform/surface: aggregator: Do not check for repeated unsequenced packets
[ Upstream commit d9a477f643eb3de71fbea5ae6103b800ceb8f547 ]
Currently, we check any received packet whether we have already seen it
previously, regardless of the packet type (sequenced / unsequenced). We
do this by checking the sequence number. This assumes that sequence
numbers are valid for both sequenced and unsequenced packets. However,
this assumption appears to be incorrect.
On some devices, the sequence number field of unsequenced packets (in
particular HID input events on the Surface Pro 9) is always zero. As a
result, the current retransmission check kicks in and discards all but
the first unsequenced packet, breaking (among other things) keyboard and
touchpad input.
Note that we have, so far, only seen packets being retransmitted in
sequenced communication. In particular, this happens when there is an
ACK timeout, causing the EC (or us) to re-send the packet waiting for an
ACK. Arguably, retransmission / duplication of unsequenced packets
should not be an issue as there is no logical condition (such as an ACK
timeout) to determine when a packet should be sent again.
Therefore, remove the retransmission check for unsequenced packets
entirely to resolve the issue.
Fixes: c167b9c7e3d6 ("platform/surface: Add Surface Aggregator subsystem")
Signed-off-by: Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221113185951.224759-1-luzmaximilian@gmail.com
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
show more ...
|
| #
d3233f4b |
| 13-Nov-2022 |
Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@gmail.com> |
platform/surface: aggregator: Do not check for repeated unsequenced packets
[ Upstream commit d9a477f643eb3de71fbea5ae6103b800ceb8f547 ]
Currently, we check any received packet whether we have alre
platform/surface: aggregator: Do not check for repeated unsequenced packets
[ Upstream commit d9a477f643eb3de71fbea5ae6103b800ceb8f547 ]
Currently, we check any received packet whether we have already seen it
previously, regardless of the packet type (sequenced / unsequenced). We
do this by checking the sequence number. This assumes that sequence
numbers are valid for both sequenced and unsequenced packets. However,
this assumption appears to be incorrect.
On some devices, the sequence number field of unsequenced packets (in
particular HID input events on the Surface Pro 9) is always zero. As a
result, the current retransmission check kicks in and discards all but
the first unsequenced packet, breaking (among other things) keyboard and
touchpad input.
Note that we have, so far, only seen packets being retransmitted in
sequenced communication. In particular, this happens when there is an
ACK timeout, causing the EC (or us) to re-send the packet waiting for an
ACK. Arguably, retransmission / duplication of unsequenced packets
should not be an issue as there is no logical condition (such as an ACK
timeout) to determine when a packet should be sent again.
Therefore, remove the retransmission check for unsequenced packets
entirely to resolve the issue.
Fixes: c167b9c7e3d6 ("platform/surface: Add Surface Aggregator subsystem")
Signed-off-by: Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221113185951.224759-1-luzmaximilian@gmail.com
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
show more ...
|
| #
d3233f4b |
| 13-Nov-2022 |
Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@gmail.com> |
platform/surface: aggregator: Do not check for repeated unsequenced packets
[ Upstream commit d9a477f643eb3de71fbea5ae6103b800ceb8f547 ]
Currently, we check any received packet whether we have alre
platform/surface: aggregator: Do not check for repeated unsequenced packets
[ Upstream commit d9a477f643eb3de71fbea5ae6103b800ceb8f547 ]
Currently, we check any received packet whether we have already seen it
previously, regardless of the packet type (sequenced / unsequenced). We
do this by checking the sequence number. This assumes that sequence
numbers are valid for both sequenced and unsequenced packets. However,
this assumption appears to be incorrect.
On some devices, the sequence number field of unsequenced packets (in
particular HID input events on the Surface Pro 9) is always zero. As a
result, the current retransmission check kicks in and discards all but
the first unsequenced packet, breaking (among other things) keyboard and
touchpad input.
Note that we have, so far, only seen packets being retransmitted in
sequenced communication. In particular, this happens when there is an
ACK timeout, causing the EC (or us) to re-send the packet waiting for an
ACK. Arguably, retransmission / duplication of unsequenced packets
should not be an issue as there is no logical condition (such as an ACK
timeout) to determine when a packet should be sent again.
Therefore, remove the retransmission check for unsequenced packets
entirely to resolve the issue.
Fixes: c167b9c7e3d6 ("platform/surface: Add Surface Aggregator subsystem")
Signed-off-by: Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221113185951.224759-1-luzmaximilian@gmail.com
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
show more ...
|
| #
d3233f4b |
| 13-Nov-2022 |
Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@gmail.com> |
platform/surface: aggregator: Do not check for repeated unsequenced packets
[ Upstream commit d9a477f643eb3de71fbea5ae6103b800ceb8f547 ]
Currently, we check any received packet whether we have alre
platform/surface: aggregator: Do not check for repeated unsequenced packets
[ Upstream commit d9a477f643eb3de71fbea5ae6103b800ceb8f547 ]
Currently, we check any received packet whether we have already seen it
previously, regardless of the packet type (sequenced / unsequenced). We
do this by checking the sequence number. This assumes that sequence
numbers are valid for both sequenced and unsequenced packets. However,
this assumption appears to be incorrect.
On some devices, the sequence number field of unsequenced packets (in
particular HID input events on the Surface Pro 9) is always zero. As a
result, the current retransmission check kicks in and discards all but
the first unsequenced packet, breaking (among other things) keyboard and
touchpad input.
Note that we have, so far, only seen packets being retransmitted in
sequenced communication. In particular, this happens when there is an
ACK timeout, causing the EC (or us) to re-send the packet waiting for an
ACK. Arguably, retransmission / duplication of unsequenced packets
should not be an issue as there is no logical condition (such as an ACK
timeout) to determine when a packet should be sent again.
Therefore, remove the retransmission check for unsequenced packets
entirely to resolve the issue.
Fixes: c167b9c7e3d6 ("platform/surface: Add Surface Aggregator subsystem")
Signed-off-by: Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221113185951.224759-1-luzmaximilian@gmail.com
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
show more ...
|
| #
d3233f4b |
| 13-Nov-2022 |
Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@gmail.com> |
platform/surface: aggregator: Do not check for repeated unsequenced packets
[ Upstream commit d9a477f643eb3de71fbea5ae6103b800ceb8f547 ]
Currently, we check any received packet whether we have alre
platform/surface: aggregator: Do not check for repeated unsequenced packets
[ Upstream commit d9a477f643eb3de71fbea5ae6103b800ceb8f547 ]
Currently, we check any received packet whether we have already seen it
previously, regardless of the packet type (sequenced / unsequenced). We
do this by checking the sequence number. This assumes that sequence
numbers are valid for both sequenced and unsequenced packets. However,
this assumption appears to be incorrect.
On some devices, the sequence number field of unsequenced packets (in
particular HID input events on the Surface Pro 9) is always zero. As a
result, the current retransmission check kicks in and discards all but
the first unsequenced packet, breaking (among other things) keyboard and
touchpad input.
Note that we have, so far, only seen packets being retransmitted in
sequenced communication. In particular, this happens when there is an
ACK timeout, causing the EC (or us) to re-send the packet waiting for an
ACK. Arguably, retransmission / duplication of unsequenced packets
should not be an issue as there is no logical condition (such as an ACK
timeout) to determine when a packet should be sent again.
Therefore, remove the retransmission check for unsequenced packets
entirely to resolve the issue.
Fixes: c167b9c7e3d6 ("platform/surface: Add Surface Aggregator subsystem")
Signed-off-by: Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221113185951.224759-1-luzmaximilian@gmail.com
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
show more ...
|
| #
d3233f4b |
| 13-Nov-2022 |
Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@gmail.com> |
platform/surface: aggregator: Do not check for repeated unsequenced packets
[ Upstream commit d9a477f643eb3de71fbea5ae6103b800ceb8f547 ]
Currently, we check any received packet whether we have alre
platform/surface: aggregator: Do not check for repeated unsequenced packets
[ Upstream commit d9a477f643eb3de71fbea5ae6103b800ceb8f547 ]
Currently, we check any received packet whether we have already seen it
previously, regardless of the packet type (sequenced / unsequenced). We
do this by checking the sequence number. This assumes that sequence
numbers are valid for both sequenced and unsequenced packets. However,
this assumption appears to be incorrect.
On some devices, the sequence number field of unsequenced packets (in
particular HID input events on the Surface Pro 9) is always zero. As a
result, the current retransmission check kicks in and discards all but
the first unsequenced packet, breaking (among other things) keyboard and
touchpad input.
Note that we have, so far, only seen packets being retransmitted in
sequenced communication. In particular, this happens when there is an
ACK timeout, causing the EC (or us) to re-send the packet waiting for an
ACK. Arguably, retransmission / duplication of unsequenced packets
should not be an issue as there is no logical condition (such as an ACK
timeout) to determine when a packet should be sent again.
Therefore, remove the retransmission check for unsequenced packets
entirely to resolve the issue.
Fixes: c167b9c7e3d6 ("platform/surface: Add Surface Aggregator subsystem")
Signed-off-by: Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221113185951.224759-1-luzmaximilian@gmail.com
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
show more ...
|
| #
d3233f4b |
| 13-Nov-2022 |
Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@gmail.com> |
platform/surface: aggregator: Do not check for repeated unsequenced packets
[ Upstream commit d9a477f643eb3de71fbea5ae6103b800ceb8f547 ]
Currently, we check any received packet whether we have alre
platform/surface: aggregator: Do not check for repeated unsequenced packets
[ Upstream commit d9a477f643eb3de71fbea5ae6103b800ceb8f547 ]
Currently, we check any received packet whether we have already seen it
previously, regardless of the packet type (sequenced / unsequenced). We
do this by checking the sequence number. This assumes that sequence
numbers are valid for both sequenced and unsequenced packets. However,
this assumption appears to be incorrect.
On some devices, the sequence number field of unsequenced packets (in
particular HID input events on the Surface Pro 9) is always zero. As a
result, the current retransmission check kicks in and discards all but
the first unsequenced packet, breaking (among other things) keyboard and
touchpad input.
Note that we have, so far, only seen packets being retransmitted in
sequenced communication. In particular, this happens when there is an
ACK timeout, causing the EC (or us) to re-send the packet waiting for an
ACK. Arguably, retransmission / duplication of unsequenced packets
should not be an issue as there is no logical condition (such as an ACK
timeout) to determine when a packet should be sent again.
Therefore, remove the retransmission check for unsequenced packets
entirely to resolve the issue.
Fixes: c167b9c7e3d6 ("platform/surface: Add Surface Aggregator subsystem")
Signed-off-by: Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221113185951.224759-1-luzmaximilian@gmail.com
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
show more ...
|
| #
d3233f4b |
| 13-Nov-2022 |
Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@gmail.com> |
platform/surface: aggregator: Do not check for repeated unsequenced packets
[ Upstream commit d9a477f643eb3de71fbea5ae6103b800ceb8f547 ]
Currently, we check any received packet whether we have alre
platform/surface: aggregator: Do not check for repeated unsequenced packets
[ Upstream commit d9a477f643eb3de71fbea5ae6103b800ceb8f547 ]
Currently, we check any received packet whether we have already seen it
previously, regardless of the packet type (sequenced / unsequenced). We
do this by checking the sequence number. This assumes that sequence
numbers are valid for both sequenced and unsequenced packets. However,
this assumption appears to be incorrect.
On some devices, the sequence number field of unsequenced packets (in
particular HID input events on the Surface Pro 9) is always zero. As a
result, the current retransmission check kicks in and discards all but
the first unsequenced packet, breaking (among other things) keyboard and
touchpad input.
Note that we have, so far, only seen packets being retransmitted in
sequenced communication. In particular, this happens when there is an
ACK timeout, causing the EC (or us) to re-send the packet waiting for an
ACK. Arguably, retransmission / duplication of unsequenced packets
should not be an issue as there is no logical condition (such as an ACK
timeout) to determine when a packet should be sent again.
Therefore, remove the retransmission check for unsequenced packets
entirely to resolve the issue.
Fixes: c167b9c7e3d6 ("platform/surface: Add Surface Aggregator subsystem")
Signed-off-by: Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221113185951.224759-1-luzmaximilian@gmail.com
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
show more ...
|
| #
d3233f4b |
| 13-Nov-2022 |
Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@gmail.com> |
platform/surface: aggregator: Do not check for repeated unsequenced packets
[ Upstream commit d9a477f643eb3de71fbea5ae6103b800ceb8f547 ]
Currently, we check any received packet whether we have alre
platform/surface: aggregator: Do not check for repeated unsequenced packets
[ Upstream commit d9a477f643eb3de71fbea5ae6103b800ceb8f547 ]
Currently, we check any received packet whether we have already seen it
previously, regardless of the packet type (sequenced / unsequenced). We
do this by checking the sequence number. This assumes that sequence
numbers are valid for both sequenced and unsequenced packets. However,
this assumption appears to be incorrect.
On some devices, the sequence number field of unsequenced packets (in
particular HID input events on the Surface Pro 9) is always zero. As a
result, the current retransmission check kicks in and discards all but
the first unsequenced packet, breaking (among other things) keyboard and
touchpad input.
Note that we have, so far, only seen packets being retransmitted in
sequenced communication. In particular, this happens when there is an
ACK timeout, causing the EC (or us) to re-send the packet waiting for an
ACK. Arguably, retransmission / duplication of unsequenced packets
should not be an issue as there is no logical condition (such as an ACK
timeout) to determine when a packet should be sent again.
Therefore, remove the retransmission check for unsequenced packets
entirely to resolve the issue.
Fixes: c167b9c7e3d6 ("platform/surface: Add Surface Aggregator subsystem")
Signed-off-by: Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221113185951.224759-1-luzmaximilian@gmail.com
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
show more ...
|
| #
d3233f4b |
| 13-Nov-2022 |
Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@gmail.com> |
platform/surface: aggregator: Do not check for repeated unsequenced packets
[ Upstream commit d9a477f643eb3de71fbea5ae6103b800ceb8f547 ]
Currently, we check any received packet whether we have alre
platform/surface: aggregator: Do not check for repeated unsequenced packets
[ Upstream commit d9a477f643eb3de71fbea5ae6103b800ceb8f547 ]
Currently, we check any received packet whether we have already seen it
previously, regardless of the packet type (sequenced / unsequenced). We
do this by checking the sequence number. This assumes that sequence
numbers are valid for both sequenced and unsequenced packets. However,
this assumption appears to be incorrect.
On some devices, the sequence number field of unsequenced packets (in
particular HID input events on the Surface Pro 9) is always zero. As a
result, the current retransmission check kicks in and discards all but
the first unsequenced packet, breaking (among other things) keyboard and
touchpad input.
Note that we have, so far, only seen packets being retransmitted in
sequenced communication. In particular, this happens when there is an
ACK timeout, causing the EC (or us) to re-send the packet waiting for an
ACK. Arguably, retransmission / duplication of unsequenced packets
should not be an issue as there is no logical condition (such as an ACK
timeout) to determine when a packet should be sent again.
Therefore, remove the retransmission check for unsequenced packets
entirely to resolve the issue.
Fixes: c167b9c7e3d6 ("platform/surface: Add Surface Aggregator subsystem")
Signed-off-by: Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221113185951.224759-1-luzmaximilian@gmail.com
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
show more ...
|
| #
d3233f4b |
| 13-Nov-2022 |
Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@gmail.com> |
platform/surface: aggregator: Do not check for repeated unsequenced packets
[ Upstream commit d9a477f643eb3de71fbea5ae6103b800ceb8f547 ]
Currently, we check any received packet whether we have alre
platform/surface: aggregator: Do not check for repeated unsequenced packets
[ Upstream commit d9a477f643eb3de71fbea5ae6103b800ceb8f547 ]
Currently, we check any received packet whether we have already seen it
previously, regardless of the packet type (sequenced / unsequenced). We
do this by checking the sequence number. This assumes that sequence
numbers are valid for both sequenced and unsequenced packets. However,
this assumption appears to be incorrect.
On some devices, the sequence number field of unsequenced packets (in
particular HID input events on the Surface Pro 9) is always zero. As a
result, the current retransmission check kicks in and discards all but
the first unsequenced packet, breaking (among other things) keyboard and
touchpad input.
Note that we have, so far, only seen packets being retransmitted in
sequenced communication. In particular, this happens when there is an
ACK timeout, causing the EC (or us) to re-send the packet waiting for an
ACK. Arguably, retransmission / duplication of unsequenced packets
should not be an issue as there is no logical condition (such as an ACK
timeout) to determine when a packet should be sent again.
Therefore, remove the retransmission check for unsequenced packets
entirely to resolve the issue.
Fixes: c167b9c7e3d6 ("platform/surface: Add Surface Aggregator subsystem")
Signed-off-by: Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221113185951.224759-1-luzmaximilian@gmail.com
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
show more ...
|
| #
d3233f4b |
| 13-Nov-2022 |
Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@gmail.com> |
platform/surface: aggregator: Do not check for repeated unsequenced packets
[ Upstream commit d9a477f643eb3de71fbea5ae6103b800ceb8f547 ]
Currently, we check any received packet whether we have alre
platform/surface: aggregator: Do not check for repeated unsequenced packets
[ Upstream commit d9a477f643eb3de71fbea5ae6103b800ceb8f547 ]
Currently, we check any received packet whether we have already seen it
previously, regardless of the packet type (sequenced / unsequenced). We
do this by checking the sequence number. This assumes that sequence
numbers are valid for both sequenced and unsequenced packets. However,
this assumption appears to be incorrect.
On some devices, the sequence number field of unsequenced packets (in
particular HID input events on the Surface Pro 9) is always zero. As a
result, the current retransmission check kicks in and discards all but
the first unsequenced packet, breaking (among other things) keyboard and
touchpad input.
Note that we have, so far, only seen packets being retransmitted in
sequenced communication. In particular, this happens when there is an
ACK timeout, causing the EC (or us) to re-send the packet waiting for an
ACK. Arguably, retransmission / duplication of unsequenced packets
should not be an issue as there is no logical condition (such as an ACK
timeout) to determine when a packet should be sent again.
Therefore, remove the retransmission check for unsequenced packets
entirely to resolve the issue.
Fixes: c167b9c7e3d6 ("platform/surface: Add Surface Aggregator subsystem")
Signed-off-by: Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221113185951.224759-1-luzmaximilian@gmail.com
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
show more ...
|
| #
d3233f4b |
| 13-Nov-2022 |
Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@gmail.com> |
platform/surface: aggregator: Do not check for repeated unsequenced packets
[ Upstream commit d9a477f643eb3de71fbea5ae6103b800ceb8f547 ]
Currently, we check any received packet whether we have alre
platform/surface: aggregator: Do not check for repeated unsequenced packets
[ Upstream commit d9a477f643eb3de71fbea5ae6103b800ceb8f547 ]
Currently, we check any received packet whether we have already seen it
previously, regardless of the packet type (sequenced / unsequenced). We
do this by checking the sequence number. This assumes that sequence
numbers are valid for both sequenced and unsequenced packets. However,
this assumption appears to be incorrect.
On some devices, the sequence number field of unsequenced packets (in
particular HID input events on the Surface Pro 9) is always zero. As a
result, the current retransmission check kicks in and discards all but
the first unsequenced packet, breaking (among other things) keyboard and
touchpad input.
Note that we have, so far, only seen packets being retransmitted in
sequenced communication. In particular, this happens when there is an
ACK timeout, causing the EC (or us) to re-send the packet waiting for an
ACK. Arguably, retransmission / duplication of unsequenced packets
should not be an issue as there is no logical condition (such as an ACK
timeout) to determine when a packet should be sent again.
Therefore, remove the retransmission check for unsequenced packets
entirely to resolve the issue.
Fixes: c167b9c7e3d6 ("platform/surface: Add Surface Aggregator subsystem")
Signed-off-by: Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221113185951.224759-1-luzmaximilian@gmail.com
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
show more ...
|
| #
d3233f4b |
| 13-Nov-2022 |
Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@gmail.com> |
platform/surface: aggregator: Do not check for repeated unsequenced packets
[ Upstream commit d9a477f643eb3de71fbea5ae6103b800ceb8f547 ]
Currently, we check any received packet whether we have alre
platform/surface: aggregator: Do not check for repeated unsequenced packets
[ Upstream commit d9a477f643eb3de71fbea5ae6103b800ceb8f547 ]
Currently, we check any received packet whether we have already seen it
previously, regardless of the packet type (sequenced / unsequenced). We
do this by checking the sequence number. This assumes that sequence
numbers are valid for both sequenced and unsequenced packets. However,
this assumption appears to be incorrect.
On some devices, the sequence number field of unsequenced packets (in
particular HID input events on the Surface Pro 9) is always zero. As a
result, the current retransmission check kicks in and discards all but
the first unsequenced packet, breaking (among other things) keyboard and
touchpad input.
Note that we have, so far, only seen packets being retransmitted in
sequenced communication. In particular, this happens when there is an
ACK timeout, causing the EC (or us) to re-send the packet waiting for an
ACK. Arguably, retransmission / duplication of unsequenced packets
should not be an issue as there is no logical condition (such as an ACK
timeout) to determine when a packet should be sent again.
Therefore, remove the retransmission check for unsequenced packets
entirely to resolve the issue.
Fixes: c167b9c7e3d6 ("platform/surface: Add Surface Aggregator subsystem")
Signed-off-by: Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221113185951.224759-1-luzmaximilian@gmail.com
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
show more ...
|
| #
d3233f4b |
| 13-Nov-2022 |
Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@gmail.com> |
platform/surface: aggregator: Do not check for repeated unsequenced packets
[ Upstream commit d9a477f643eb3de71fbea5ae6103b800ceb8f547 ]
Currently, we check any received packet whether we have alre
platform/surface: aggregator: Do not check for repeated unsequenced packets
[ Upstream commit d9a477f643eb3de71fbea5ae6103b800ceb8f547 ]
Currently, we check any received packet whether we have already seen it
previously, regardless of the packet type (sequenced / unsequenced). We
do this by checking the sequence number. This assumes that sequence
numbers are valid for both sequenced and unsequenced packets. However,
this assumption appears to be incorrect.
On some devices, the sequence number field of unsequenced packets (in
particular HID input events on the Surface Pro 9) is always zero. As a
result, the current retransmission check kicks in and discards all but
the first unsequenced packet, breaking (among other things) keyboard and
touchpad input.
Note that we have, so far, only seen packets being retransmitted in
sequenced communication. In particular, this happens when there is an
ACK timeout, causing the EC (or us) to re-send the packet waiting for an
ACK. Arguably, retransmission / duplication of unsequenced packets
should not be an issue as there is no logical condition (such as an ACK
timeout) to determine when a packet should be sent again.
Therefore, remove the retransmission check for unsequenced packets
entirely to resolve the issue.
Fixes: c167b9c7e3d6 ("platform/surface: Add Surface Aggregator subsystem")
Signed-off-by: Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221113185951.224759-1-luzmaximilian@gmail.com
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
show more ...
|
| #
d3233f4b |
| 13-Nov-2022 |
Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@gmail.com> |
platform/surface: aggregator: Do not check for repeated unsequenced packets
[ Upstream commit d9a477f643eb3de71fbea5ae6103b800ceb8f547 ]
Currently, we check any received packet whether we have alre
platform/surface: aggregator: Do not check for repeated unsequenced packets
[ Upstream commit d9a477f643eb3de71fbea5ae6103b800ceb8f547 ]
Currently, we check any received packet whether we have already seen it
previously, regardless of the packet type (sequenced / unsequenced). We
do this by checking the sequence number. This assumes that sequence
numbers are valid for both sequenced and unsequenced packets. However,
this assumption appears to be incorrect.
On some devices, the sequence number field of unsequenced packets (in
particular HID input events on the Surface Pro 9) is always zero. As a
result, the current retransmission check kicks in and discards all but
the first unsequenced packet, breaking (among other things) keyboard and
touchpad input.
Note that we have, so far, only seen packets being retransmitted in
sequenced communication. In particular, this happens when there is an
ACK timeout, causing the EC (or us) to re-send the packet waiting for an
ACK. Arguably, retransmission / duplication of unsequenced packets
should not be an issue as there is no logical condition (such as an ACK
timeout) to determine when a packet should be sent again.
Therefore, remove the retransmission check for unsequenced packets
entirely to resolve the issue.
Fixes: c167b9c7e3d6 ("platform/surface: Add Surface Aggregator subsystem")
Signed-off-by: Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221113185951.224759-1-luzmaximilian@gmail.com
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
show more ...
|
| #
d3233f4b |
| 13-Nov-2022 |
Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@gmail.com> |
platform/surface: aggregator: Do not check for repeated unsequenced packets
[ Upstream commit d9a477f643eb3de71fbea5ae6103b800ceb8f547 ]
Currently, we check any received packet whether we have alre
platform/surface: aggregator: Do not check for repeated unsequenced packets
[ Upstream commit d9a477f643eb3de71fbea5ae6103b800ceb8f547 ]
Currently, we check any received packet whether we have already seen it
previously, regardless of the packet type (sequenced / unsequenced). We
do this by checking the sequence number. This assumes that sequence
numbers are valid for both sequenced and unsequenced packets. However,
this assumption appears to be incorrect.
On some devices, the sequence number field of unsequenced packets (in
particular HID input events on the Surface Pro 9) is always zero. As a
result, the current retransmission check kicks in and discards all but
the first unsequenced packet, breaking (among other things) keyboard and
touchpad input.
Note that we have, so far, only seen packets being retransmitted in
sequenced communication. In particular, this happens when there is an
ACK timeout, causing the EC (or us) to re-send the packet waiting for an
ACK. Arguably, retransmission / duplication of unsequenced packets
should not be an issue as there is no logical condition (such as an ACK
timeout) to determine when a packet should be sent again.
Therefore, remove the retransmission check for unsequenced packets
entirely to resolve the issue.
Fixes: c167b9c7e3d6 ("platform/surface: Add Surface Aggregator subsystem")
Signed-off-by: Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221113185951.224759-1-luzmaximilian@gmail.com
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
show more ...
|