PCI: Fix printk field formatting

Previously we used "%#08x" to print a 32-bit value. This fills an
8-character field with "0x...", but of course many 32-bit values require a
10-character field "0x1

PCI: Fix printk field formatting

Previously we used "%#08x" to print a 32-bit value. This fills an
8-character field with "0x...", but of course many 32-bit values require a
10-character field "0x12345678" for this format. Fix the formats to avoid
confusion.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230824193712.542167-5-helgaas@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>

show more ...

PCI: Introduce pci_dev_for_each_resource()

Instead of open-coding it everywhere introduce a tiny helper that can be
used to iterate over each resource of a PCI device, and convert the most
obvious u

PCI: Introduce pci_dev_for_each_resource()

Instead of open-coding it everywhere introduce a tiny helper that can be
used to iterate over each resource of a PCI device, and convert the most
obvious users into it.

While at it drop doubled empty line before pdev_sort_resources().

No functional changes intended.

Suggested-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230330162434.35055-4-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@linux.com>

show more ...

PCI: Sanitise firmware BAR assignments behind a PCI-PCI bridge

When pci_assign_resource() is unable to assign resources to a BAR, it uses
pci_revert_fw_address() to fall back to a firmware assignmen

PCI: Sanitise firmware BAR assignments behind a PCI-PCI bridge

When pci_assign_resource() is unable to assign resources to a BAR, it uses
pci_revert_fw_address() to fall back to a firmware assignment (if any).
Previously pci_revert_fw_address() assumed all addresses could reach the
device, but this is not true if the device is below a bridge that only
forwards addresses within its windows.

This problem was observed on a Tyan Tomcat IV S1564D system where the BIOS
did not assign valid addresses to several bridges and USB devices:

pci 0000:00:11.0: PCI-to-PCIe bridge to [bus 01-ff]
pci 0000:00:11.0: bridge window [io 0xe000-0xefff]
pci 0000:01:00.0: PCIe Upstream Port to [bus 02-ff]
pci 0000:01:00.0: bridge window [io 0x0000-0x0fff] # unreachable
pci 0000:02:02.0: PCIe Downstream Port to [bus 05-ff]
pci 0000:02:02.0: bridge window [io 0x0000-0x0fff] # unreachable
pci 0000:05:00.0: PCIe-to-PCI bridge to [bus 06-ff]
pci 0000:05:00.0: bridge window [io 0x0000-0x0fff] # unreachable
pci 0000:06:08.0: USB UHCI 1.1
pci 0000:06:08.0: BAR 4: [io 0xfce0-0xfcff] # unreachable
pci 0000:06:08.1: USB UHCI 1.1
pci 0000:06:08.1: BAR 4: [io 0xfce0-0xfcff] # unreachable
pci 0000:06:08.0: can't claim BAR 4 [io 0xfce0-0xfcff]: no compatible bridge window
pci 0000:06:08.1: can't claim BAR 4 [io 0xfce0-0xfcff]: no compatible bridge window

During the first pass of assigning unassigned resources, there was not
enough I/O space available, so we couldn't assign the 06:08.0 BAR and
reverted to the firmware assignment (still unreachable). Reverting the
06:08.1 assignment failed because it conflicted with 06:08.0:

pci 0000:00:11.0: bridge window [io 0xe000-0xefff]
pci 0000:01:00.0: no space for bridge window [io size 0x2000]
pci 0000:02:02.0: no space for bridge window [io size 0x1000]
pci 0000:05:00.0: no space for bridge window [io size 0x1000]
pci 0000:06:08.0: BAR 4: no space for [io size 0x0020]
pci 0000:06:08.0: BAR 4: trying firmware assignment [io 0xfce0-0xfcff]
pci 0000:06:08.1: BAR 4: no space for [io size 0x0020]
pci 0000:06:08.1: BAR 4: trying firmware assignment [io 0xfce0-0xfcff]
pci 0000:06:08.1: BAR 4: [io 0xfce0-0xfcff] conflicts with 0000:06:08.0 [io 0xfce0-0xfcff]

A subsequent pass assigned valid bridge windows and a valid 06:08.1 BAR,
but left the 06:08.0 BAR alone, so the UHCI device was still unusable:

pci 0000:00:11.0: bridge window [io 0xe000-0xefff] released
pci 0000:00:11.0: bridge window [io 0x1000-0x2fff] # reassigned
pci 0000:01:00.0: bridge window [io 0x1000-0x2fff] # reassigned
pci 0000:02:02.0: bridge window [io 0x2000-0x2fff] # reassigned
pci 0000:05:00.0: bridge window [io 0x2000-0x2fff] # reassigned
pci 0000:06:08.0: BAR 4: assigned [io 0xfce0-0xfcff] # left alone
pci 0000:06:08.1: BAR 4: assigned [io 0x2000-0x201f]
...
uhci_hcd 0000:06:08.0: host system error, PCI problems?
uhci_hcd 0000:06:08.0: host controller process error, something bad happened!
uhci_hcd 0000:06:08.0: host controller halted, very bad!
uhci_hcd 0000:06:08.0: HCRESET not completed yet!
uhci_hcd 0000:06:08.0: HC died; cleaning up

If the address assigned by firmware is not reachable because it's not
within upstream bridge windows, fail instead of assigning the unusable
address from firmware.

[bhelgaas: commit log, use pci_upstream_bridge()]
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16263
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/alpine.DEB.2.21.2203012338460.46819@angie.orcam.me.uk
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/alpine.DEB.2.21.2209211921250.29493@angie.orcam.me.uk
Fixes: 58c84eda0756 ("PCI: fall back to original BIOS BAR addresses")
Signed-off-by: Maciej W. Rozycki <macro@orcam.me.uk>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v2.6.35+

show more ...

PCI: Work around Intel I210 ROM BAR overlap defect

Per PCIe r5, sec 7.5.1.2.4, a device must not claim accesses to its
Expansion ROM unless both the Memory Space Enable and the Expansion ROM
Enable

PCI: Work around Intel I210 ROM BAR overlap defect

Per PCIe r5, sec 7.5.1.2.4, a device must not claim accesses to its
Expansion ROM unless both the Memory Space Enable and the Expansion ROM
Enable bit are set. But apparently some Intel I210 NICs don't work
correctly if the ROM BAR overlaps another BAR, even if the Expansion ROM is
disabled.

Michael reported that on a Kontron SMARC-sAL28 ARM64 system with U-Boot
v2021.01-rc3, the ROM BAR overlaps BAR 3, and networking doesn't work at
all:

BAR 0: 0x40000000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=1M]
BAR 3: 0x40200000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=16K]
ROM: 0x40200000 (disabled) [size=1M]

NETDEV WATCHDOG: enP2p1s0 (igb): transmit queue 0 timed out
Hardware name: Kontron SMARC-sAL28 (Single PHY) on SMARC Eval 2.0 carrier (DT)
igb 0002:01:00.0 enP2p1s0: Reset adapter

Previously, pci_std_update_resource() wrote the assigned ROM address to the
BAR only when the ROM was enabled. This meant that the I210 ROM BAR could
be left with an address assigned by firmware, which might overlap with
other BARs.

Quirk these I210 devices so pci_std_update_resource() always writes the
assigned address to the ROM BAR, whether or not the ROM is enabled.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211223163754.GA1267351@bhelgaas
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201230185317.30915-1-michael@walle.cc
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=211105
Reported-by: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>
Tested-by: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>

show more ...

PCI: Sanitise firmware BAR assignments behind a PCI-PCI bridge

commit 0e32818397426a688f598f35d3bc762eca6d7592 upstream.

When pci_assign_resource() is unable to assign resources to a BAR, it uses
p

PCI: Sanitise firmware BAR assignments behind a PCI-PCI bridge

commit 0e32818397426a688f598f35d3bc762eca6d7592 upstream.

When pci_assign_resource() is unable to assign resources to a BAR, it uses
pci_revert_fw_address() to fall back to a firmware assignment (if any).
Previously pci_revert_fw_address() assumed all addresses could reach the
device, but this is not true if the device is below a bridge that only
forwards addresses within its windows.

This problem was observed on a Tyan Tomcat IV S1564D system where the BIOS
did not assign valid addresses to several bridges and USB devices:

pci 0000:00:11.0: PCI-to-PCIe bridge to [bus 01-ff]
pci 0000:00:11.0: bridge window [io 0xe000-0xefff]
pci 0000:01:00.0: PCIe Upstream Port to [bus 02-ff]
pci 0000:01:00.0: bridge window [io 0x0000-0x0fff] # unreachable
pci 0000:02:02.0: PCIe Downstream Port to [bus 05-ff]
pci 0000:02:02.0: bridge window [io 0x0000-0x0fff] # unreachable
pci 0000:05:00.0: PCIe-to-PCI bridge to [bus 06-ff]
pci 0000:05:00.0: bridge window [io 0x0000-0x0fff] # unreachable
pci 0000:06:08.0: USB UHCI 1.1
pci 0000:06:08.0: BAR 4: [io 0xfce0-0xfcff] # unreachable
pci 0000:06:08.1: USB UHCI 1.1
pci 0000:06:08.1: BAR 4: [io 0xfce0-0xfcff] # unreachable
pci 0000:06:08.0: can't claim BAR 4 [io 0xfce0-0xfcff]: no compatible bridge window
pci 0000:06:08.1: can't claim BAR 4 [io 0xfce0-0xfcff]: no compatible bridge window

During the first pass of assigning unassigned resources, there was not
enough I/O space available, so we couldn't assign the 06:08.0 BAR and
reverted to the firmware assignment (still unreachable). Reverting the
06:08.1 assignment failed because it conflicted with 06:08.0:

pci 0000:00:11.0: bridge window [io 0xe000-0xefff]
pci 0000:01:00.0: no space for bridge window [io size 0x2000]
pci 0000:02:02.0: no space for bridge window [io size 0x1000]
pci 0000:05:00.0: no space for bridge window [io size 0x1000]
pci 0000:06:08.0: BAR 4: no space for [io size 0x0020]
pci 0000:06:08.0: BAR 4: trying firmware assignment [io 0xfce0-0xfcff]
pci 0000:06:08.1: BAR 4: no space for [io size 0x0020]
pci 0000:06:08.1: BAR 4: trying firmware assignment [io 0xfce0-0xfcff]
pci 0000:06:08.1: BAR 4: [io 0xfce0-0xfcff] conflicts with 0000:06:08.0 [io 0xfce0-0xfcff]

A subsequent pass assigned valid bridge windows and a valid 06:08.1 BAR,
but left the 06:08.0 BAR alone, so the UHCI device was still unusable:

pci 0000:00:11.0: bridge window [io 0xe000-0xefff] released
pci 0000:00:11.0: bridge window [io 0x1000-0x2fff] # reassigned
pci 0000:01:00.0: bridge window [io 0x1000-0x2fff] # reassigned
pci 0000:02:02.0: bridge window [io 0x2000-0x2fff] # reassigned
pci 0000:05:00.0: bridge window [io 0x2000-0x2fff] # reassigned
pci 0000:06:08.0: BAR 4: assigned [io 0xfce0-0xfcff] # left alone
pci 0000:06:08.1: BAR 4: assigned [io 0x2000-0x201f]
...
uhci_hcd 0000:06:08.0: host system error, PCI problems?
uhci_hcd 0000:06:08.0: host controller process error, something bad happened!
uhci_hcd 0000:06:08.0: host controller halted, very bad!
uhci_hcd 0000:06:08.0: HCRESET not completed yet!
uhci_hcd 0000:06:08.0: HC died; cleaning up

If the address assigned by firmware is not reachable because it's not
within upstream bridge windows, fail instead of assigning the unusable
address from firmware.

[bhelgaas: commit log, use pci_upstream_bridge()]
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16263
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/alpine.DEB.2.21.2203012338460.46819@angie.orcam.me.uk
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/alpine.DEB.2.21.2209211921250.29493@angie.orcam.me.uk
Fixes: 58c84eda0756 ("PCI: fall back to original BIOS BAR addresses")
Signed-off-by: Maciej W. Rozycki <macro@orcam.me.uk>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v2.6.35+
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

show more ...

PCI: Decline to resize resources if boot config must be preserved

The _DSM #5 method in the ACPI host bridge object tells us whether the OS
must preserve the resource assignments done by firmware. I

PCI: Decline to resize resources if boot config must be preserved

The _DSM #5 method in the ACPI host bridge object tells us whether the OS
must preserve the resource assignments done by firmware. If this is the
case, we should not permit drivers to resize BARs on the fly. Make
pci_resize_resource() take this into account.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210109095353.13417-1-ardb@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.4+

show more ...

PCI: Decline to resize resources if boot config must be preserved

commit 729e3a669d1b62e9876a671ac03ccba399a23b68 upstream.

The _DSM #5 method in the ACPI host bridge object tells us whether the OS

PCI: Decline to resize resources if boot config must be preserved

commit 729e3a669d1b62e9876a671ac03ccba399a23b68 upstream.

The _DSM #5 method in the ACPI host bridge object tells us whether the OS
must preserve the resource assignments done by firmware. If this is the
case, we should not permit drivers to resize BARs on the fly. Make
pci_resize_resource() take this into account.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210109095353.13417-1-ardb@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.4+
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

show more ...

PCI: Replace lkml.org, spinics, gmane with lore.kernel.org

The lkml.org, spinics.net, and gmane.org archives are not very reliable
and, in some cases, not even easily accessible. Replace links to t

PCI: Replace lkml.org, spinics, gmane with lore.kernel.org

The lkml.org, spinics.net, and gmane.org archives are not very reliable
and, in some cases, not even easily accessible. Replace links to them with
links to lore.kernel.org, the archives hosted by kernel.org.

I found the gmane items via the Wayback Machine archive at
https://web.archive.org/.

Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>

show more ...

PCI: Allow pci_resize_resource() for devices on root bus

When resizing a BAR, pci_reassign_bridge_resources() is invoked to bring
the bridge windows of parent bridges in line with the new BAR assign

PCI: Allow pci_resize_resource() for devices on root bus

When resizing a BAR, pci_reassign_bridge_resources() is invoked to bring
the bridge windows of parent bridges in line with the new BAR assignment.

This assumes the device whose BAR is being resized lives on a subordinate
bus, but this is not necessarily the case. A device may live on the root
bus, in which case dev->bus->self is NULL, and passing a NULL pci_dev
pointer to pci_reassign_bridge_resources() will cause it to crash.

So let's make the call to pci_reassign_bridge_resources() conditional on
whether dev->bus->self is non-NULL in the first place.

Fixes: 8bb705e3e79d84e7 ("PCI: Add pci_resize_resource() for resizing BARs")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200421162256.26887-1-ardb@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>

show more ...

PCI: Remove messages about reassigning resources

When reassigning device resources to increase their alignment, e.g.,
because of a "pci=resource_alignment=" kernel parameter or because the
platform

PCI: Remove messages about reassigning resources

When reassigning device resources to increase their alignment, e.g.,
because of a "pci=resource_alignment=" kernel parameter or because the
platform aligns resources to its page size, we previously emitted messages
like this:

pci 0000:00:00.0: Disabling memory decoding and releasing memory resources
pci 0000:00:00.0: disabling bridge mem windows

These messages don't convey any useful information, so remove them.

Fixes: 38274637699 ("powerpc/powernv: Override pcibios_default_alignment() to force PCI devices to be page aligned")
Signed-off-by: Desnes A. Nunes do Rosario <desnesn@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
[bhelgaas: changelog]
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>

show more ...

PCI: Tidy comments

Remove pointless comments that tell us the file name, remove blank line
comments, follow multi-line comment conventions. No functional change
intended.

Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helg

PCI: Tidy comments

Remove pointless comments that tell us the file name, remove blank line
comments, follow multi-line comment conventions. No functional change
intended.

Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>

show more ...

PCI: Allow release of resources that were never assigned

It is entirely possible that the BIOS wasn't able to assign resources to a
device. In this case don't crash in pci_release_resource() when we

PCI: Allow release of resources that were never assigned

It is entirely possible that the BIOS wasn't able to assign resources to a
device. In this case don't crash in pci_release_resource() when we try to
resize the resource.

Fixes: 8bb705e3e79d ("PCI: Add pci_resize_resource() for resizing BARs")
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.15+

show more ...

PCI: Add wrappers for dev_printk()

Add PCI-specific dev_printk() wrappers and use them to simplify the code
slightly. No functional change intended.

Signed-off-by: Frederick Lawler <fred@fredlawl.

PCI: Add wrappers for dev_printk()

Add PCI-specific dev_printk() wrappers and use them to simplify the code
slightly. No functional change intended.

Signed-off-by: Frederick Lawler <fred@fredlawl.com>
[bhelgaas: squash into one patch]
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>

show more ...

License cleanup: add SPDX GPL-2.0 license identifier to files with no license

Many source files in the tree are missing licensing information, which
makes it harder for compliance tools to determine

License cleanup: add SPDX GPL-2.0 license identifier to files with no license

Many source files in the tree are missing licensing information, which
makes it harder for compliance tools to determine the correct license.

By default all files without license information are under the default
license of the kernel, which is GPL version 2.

Update the files which contain no license information with the 'GPL-2.0'
SPDX license identifier. The SPDX identifier is a legally binding
shorthand, which can be used instead of the full boiler plate text.

This patch is based on work done by Thomas Gleixner and Kate Stewart and
Philippe Ombredanne.

How this work was done:

Patches were generated and checked against linux-4.14-rc6 for a subset of
the use cases:
- file had no licensing information it it.
- file was a */uapi/* one with no licensing information in it,
- file was a */uapi/* one with existing licensing information,

Further patches will be generated in subsequent months to fix up cases
where non-standard license headers were used, and references to license
had to be inferred by heuristics based on keywords.

The analysis to determine which SPDX License Identifier to be applied to
a file was done in a spreadsheet of side by side results from of the
output of two independent scanners (ScanCode & Windriver) producing SPDX
tag:value files created by Philippe Ombredanne. Philippe prepared the
base worksheet, and did an initial spot review of a few 1000 files.

The 4.13 kernel was the starting point of the analysis with 60,537 files
assessed. Kate Stewart did a file by file comparison of the scanner
results in the spreadsheet to determine which SPDX license identifier(s)
to be applied to the file. She confirmed any determination that was not
immediately clear with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.

Criteria used to select files for SPDX license identifier tagging was:
- Files considered eligible had to be source code files.
- Make and config files were included as candidates if they contained >5
lines of source
- File already had some variant of a license header in it (even if <5
lines).

All documentation files were explicitly excluded.

The following heuristics were used to determine which SPDX license
identifiers to apply.

- when both scanners couldn't find any license traces, file was
considered to have no license information in it, and the top level
COPYING file license applied.

For non */uapi/* files that summary was:

SPDX license identifier # files
---------------------------------------------------|-------
GPL-2.0 11139

and resulted in the first patch in this series.

If that file was a */uapi/* path one, it was "GPL-2.0 WITH
Linux-syscall-note" otherwise it was "GPL-2.0". Results of that was:

SPDX license identifier # files
---------------------------------------------------|-------
GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 930

and resulted in the second patch in this series.

- if a file had some form of licensing information in it, and was one
of the */uapi/* ones, it was denoted with the Linux-syscall-note if
any GPL family license was found in the file or had no licensing in
it (per prior point). Results summary:

SPDX license identifier # files
---------------------------------------------------|------
GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 270
GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 169
((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-2-Clause) 21
((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 17
LGPL-2.1+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 15
GPL-1.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 14
((GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 5
LGPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 4
LGPL-2.1 WITH Linux-syscall-note 3
((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR MIT) 3
((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) AND MIT) 1

and that resulted in the third patch in this series.

- when the two scanners agreed on the detected license(s), that became
the concluded license(s).

- when there was disagreement between the two scanners (one detected a
license but the other didn't, or they both detected different
licenses) a manual inspection of the file occurred.

- In most cases a manual inspection of the information in the file
resulted in a clear resolution of the license that should apply (and
which scanner probably needed to revisit its heuristics).

- When it was not immediately clear, the license identifier was
confirmed with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.

- If there was any question as to the appropriate license identifier,
the file was flagged for further research and to be revisited later
in time.

In total, over 70 hours of logged manual review was done on the
spreadsheet to determine the SPDX license identifiers to apply to the
source files by Kate, Philippe, Thomas and, in some cases, confirmation
by lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.

Kate also obtained a third independent scan of the 4.13 code base from
FOSSology, and compared selected files where the other two scanners
disagreed against that SPDX file, to see if there was new insights. The
Windriver scanner is based on an older version of FOSSology in part, so
they are related.

Thomas did random spot checks in about 500 files from the spreadsheets
for the uapi headers and agreed with SPDX license identifier in the
files he inspected. For the non-uapi files Thomas did random spot checks
in about 15000 files.

In initial set of patches against 4.14-rc6, 3 files were found to have
copy/paste license identifier errors, and have been fixed to reflect the
correct identifier.

Additionally Philippe spent 10 hours this week doing a detailed manual
inspection and review of the 12,461 patched files from the initial patch
version early this week with:
- a full scancode scan run, collecting the matched texts, detected
license ids and scores
- reviewing anything where there was a license detected (about 500+
files) to ensure that the applied SPDX license was correct
- reviewing anything where there was no detection but the patch license
was not GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note to ensure that the applied
SPDX license was correct

This produced a worksheet with 20 files needing minor correction. This
worksheet was then exported into 3 different .csv files for the
different types of files to be modified.

These .csv files were then reviewed by Greg. Thomas wrote a script to
parse the csv files and add the proper SPDX tag to the file, in the
format that the file expected. This script was further refined by Greg
based on the output to detect more types of files automatically and to
distinguish between header and source .c files (which need different
comment types.) Finally Greg ran the script using the .csv files to
generate the patches.

Reviewed-by: Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

show more ...

PCI: Add pci_resize_resource() for resizing BARs

Add a pci_resize_resource() interface to allow device drivers to resize
BARs of their devices.

This is useful for devices with large local storage,

PCI: Add pci_resize_resource() for resizing BARs

Add a pci_resize_resource() interface to allow device drivers to resize
BARs of their devices.

This is useful for devices with large local storage, e.g., graphics
devices. These devices often only expose 256MB BARs initially to be
compatible with 32-bit systems.

This function only tries to reprogram the windows of the bridge directly
above the requesting device and only the BAR of the same type (usually mem,
64bit, prefetchable). This is done to avoid disturbing other drivers by
changing the BARs of their devices.

Drivers should use the following sequence to resize their BARs:
1. Disable memory decoding of the device using the PCI cfg dword.
2. Use pci_release_resource() to release all BARs which can move during the
resize, including the one you want to resize.
3. Call pci_resize_resource() for each BAR you want to resize.
4. Call pci_assign_unassigned_bus_resources() to reassign new locations
for all BARs which are not resized, but could move.
5. If everything worked as expected, enable memory decoding in the device
again using the PCI cfg dword.

Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>

show more ...

PCI: Add a generic weak pcibios_align_resource()

Multiple architectures define this as a trivial function, and I'm adding
another one as part of the RISC-V port. Add a __weak version of
pcibios_ali

PCI: Add a generic weak pcibios_align_resource()

Multiple architectures define this as a trivial function, and I'm adding
another one as part of the RISC-V port. Add a __weak version of
pcibios_align_resource() and delete the now-obselete ones in a handful of
ports.

The only functional change should be that a handful of ports used to export
pcibios_fixup_bus(). Only some architectures export this, so I just
dropped it.

Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>

show more ...

PCI: Make PCI_ROM_ADDRESS_MASK a 32-bit constant

A 64-bit value is not needed since a PCI ROM address consists in 32 bits.
This fixes a clang warning about "implicit conversion from 'unsigned long'

PCI: Make PCI_ROM_ADDRESS_MASK a 32-bit constant

A 64-bit value is not needed since a PCI ROM address consists in 32 bits.
This fixes a clang warning about "implicit conversion from 'unsigned long'
to 'u32'".

Also remove now unnecessary casts to u32 from __pci_read_base() and
pci_std_update_resource().

Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>

show more ...

PCI: Add comments about ROM BAR updating

pci_update_resource() updates a hardware BAR so its address matches the
kernel's struct resource UNLESS it's a disabled ROM BAR. We only update
those when w

PCI: Add comments about ROM BAR updating

pci_update_resource() updates a hardware BAR so its address matches the
kernel's struct resource UNLESS it's a disabled ROM BAR. We only update
those when we enable the ROM.

It's not obvious from the code why ROM BARs should be handled specially.
Apparently there are Matrox devices with defective ROM BARs that read as
zero when disabled. That means that if pci_enable_rom() reads the disabled
BAR, sets PCI_ROM_ADDRESS_ENABLE (without re-inserting the address), and
writes it back, it would enable the ROM at address zero.

Add comments and references to explain why we can't make the code look more
rational.

The code changes are from 755528c860b0 ("Ignore disabled ROM resources at
setup") and 8085ce084c0f ("[PATCH] Fix PCI ROM mapping").

Link: https://lkml.org/lkml/2005/8/30/138
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

show more ...

PCI: Remove pci_resource_bar() and pci_iov_resource_bar()

pci_std_update_resource() only deals with standard BARs, so we don't have
to worry about the complications of VF BARs in an SR-IOV capabilit

PCI: Remove pci_resource_bar() and pci_iov_resource_bar()

pci_std_update_resource() only deals with standard BARs, so we don't have
to worry about the complications of VF BARs in an SR-IOV capability.

Compute the BAR address inline and remove pci_resource_bar(). That makes
pci_iov_resource_bar() unused, so remove that as well.

Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

show more ...

PCI: Separate VF BAR updates from standard BAR updates

Previously pci_update_resource() used the same code path for updating
standard BARs and VF BARs in SR-IOV capabilities.

Split the VF BAR updat

PCI: Separate VF BAR updates from standard BAR updates

Previously pci_update_resource() used the same code path for updating
standard BARs and VF BARs in SR-IOV capabilities.

Split the VF BAR update into a new pci_iov_update_resource() internal
interface, which makes it simpler to compute the BAR address (we can get
rid of pci_resource_bar() and pci_iov_resource_bar()).

This patch:

- Renames pci_update_resource() to pci_std_update_resource(),
- Adds pci_iov_update_resource(),
- Makes pci_update_resource() a wrapper that calls the appropriate one,

No functional change intended.

Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

show more ...

PCI: Update BARs using property bits appropriate for type

The BAR property bits (0-3 for memory BARs, 0-1 for I/O BARs) are supposed
to be read-only, but we do save them in res->flags and include th

PCI: Update BARs using property bits appropriate for type

The BAR property bits (0-3 for memory BARs, 0-1 for I/O BARs) are supposed
to be read-only, but we do save them in res->flags and include them when
updating the BAR.

Mask the I/O property bits with ~PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_IO_MASK (0x3) instead of
PCI_REGION_FLAG_MASK (0xf) to make it obvious that we can't corrupt bits
2-3 of I/O addresses.

Use PCI_ROM_ADDRESS_MASK for ROM BARs. This means we'll only check the top
21 bits (instead of the 28 bits we used to check) of a ROM BAR to see if
the update was successful.

Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>

show more ...

PCI: Ignore BAR updates on virtual functions

VF BARs are read-only zero, so updating VF BARs will not have any effect.
See the SR-IOV spec r1.1, sec 3.4.1.11.

We already ignore these updates becaus

PCI: Ignore BAR updates on virtual functions

VF BARs are read-only zero, so updating VF BARs will not have any effect.
See the SR-IOV spec r1.1, sec 3.4.1.11.

We already ignore these updates because of 70675e0b6a1a ("PCI: Don't try to
restore VF BARs"); this merely restructures it slightly to make it easier
to split updates for standard and SR-IOV BARs.

Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

show more ...

PCI: Don't attempt to claim shadow copies of ROM

If we're using a shadow copy of a PCI device ROM, the shadow copy is in RAM
and the device never sees accesses to it and doesn't respond to it. We
d

PCI: Don't attempt to claim shadow copies of ROM

If we're using a shadow copy of a PCI device ROM, the shadow copy is in RAM
and the device never sees accesses to it and doesn't respond to it. We
don't have to route the shadow range to the PCI device, and the device
doesn't have to claim the range.

Previously we treated the shadow copy as though it were the ROM BAR, and we
failed to claim it because the region wasn't routed to the device:

pci 0000:01:00.0: Video device with shadowed ROM at [mem 0x000c0000-0x000dffff]
pci_bus 0000:01: Allocating resources
pci 0000:01:00.0: can't claim BAR 6 [mem 0x000c0000-0x000dffff]: no compatible bridge window

The failure path of pcibios_allocate_dev_rom_resource() cleared out the
resource start address, which also caused the following ioremap() warning:

WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 116 at /build/linux-akdJXO/linux-4.8.0/arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c:121 __ioremap_caller+0x1ec/0x370
ioremap on RAM at 0x0000000000000000 - 0x000000000001ffff

Handle an option ROM shadow copy as RAM, without trying to insert it into
the iomem resource tree.

This fixes a regression caused by 0c0e0736acad ("PCI: Set ROM shadow
location in arch code, not in PCI core"), which appeared in v4.6. The
regression causes video device initialization to fail. This was reported
on AMD Turks, but it likely affects others as well.

Fixes: 0c0e0736acad ("PCI: Set ROM shadow location in arch code, not in PCI core")
Reported-and-tested-by: Vecu Bosseur <vecu.bosseur@gmail.com>
Link: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1627496
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=175391
Link: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352272
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.6+

show more ...

PCI: Don't assign or reassign immutable resources

IORESOURCE_PCI_FIXED means the resource can't be moved, so if it's set,
don't bother trying to assign or reassign the resource.

Signed-off-by: Bjor

PCI: Don't assign or reassign immutable resources

IORESOURCE_PCI_FIXED means the resource can't be moved, so if it's set,
don't bother trying to assign or reassign the resource.

Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>

show more ...

PCI: Clear IORESOURCE_UNSET when reverting to firmware-assigned address

If pci_assign_resource() fails to assign space for a BAR, we may restore
the BAR to whatever firmware left there at boot-time

PCI: Clear IORESOURCE_UNSET when reverting to firmware-assigned address

If pci_assign_resource() fails to assign space for a BAR, we may restore
the BAR to whatever firmware left there at boot-time (this depends on
whether the arch implements pcibios_retrieve_fw_addr()). The messages we
print are not as useful as they could be:

pci 0000:00:01.0: BAR 15: assigned [mem 0xc0000000-0xc01fffff 64bit pref]
pci 0000:01:00.0: BAR 0: no space for [mem size 0x10000000 pref]
pci 0000:01:00.0: BAR 0: trying firmware assignment [mem size 0x10000000 pref]
pci 0000:01:00.0: BAR 0: [mem size 0x10000000 pref] conflicts with PCI Bus 0000:00 [mem 0xc0000000-0xffffffff window]

The last two lines should contain the actual BAR address, not the size.
Clear IORESOURCE_UNSET so we print the address. If requesting the
firmware-assigned resource fails, mark it IORESOURCE_UNSET again.

This is a cosmetic change to clarify the message: previously, if
pci_revert_fw_address() succeeded, pci_assign_resource() cleared
IORESOURCE_UNSET anyway, so this isn't really a functional change.

Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=85491#c50
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>

show more ...