ACPI / hotplug / PCI: Embed function struct into struct acpiphp_context

Since there has to be a struct acpiphp_func object for every struct
acpiphp_context created by register_slot(), th

ACPI / hotplug / PCI: Embed function struct into struct acpiphp_context

Since there has to be a struct acpiphp_func object for every struct
acpiphp_context created by register_slot(), the struct acpiphp_func
one can be embedded into the struct acpiphp_context one, which allows
some code simplifications to be made.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>

show more ...

ACPI / hotplug / PCI: Drop flags field from struct acpiphp_bridge

The only bridge flag used by the ACPI-based PCI hotplug (ACPIPHP)
code is BRIDGE_HAS_EJ0, but it is only used by the eve

ACPI / hotplug / PCI: Drop flags field from struct acpiphp_bridge

The only bridge flag used by the ACPI-based PCI hotplug (ACPIPHP)
code is BRIDGE_HAS_EJ0, but it is only used by the event handling
function hotplug_event() and if that flag is set, the corresponding
function flag FUNC_HAS_EJ0 is set as well, so that bridge flag is
redundant.

For this reason, drop BRIDGE_HAS_EJ0 and all code referring to it
and since it is the only bridge flag defined, drop the flags field
from struct acpiphp_bridge entirely.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>

show more ...

ACPI / hotplug / PCI: Drop sun field from struct acpiphp_slot

If the slot unique number is passed as an additional argument to
acpiphp_register_hotplug_slot(), the 'sun' field in struct

ACPI / hotplug / PCI: Drop sun field from struct acpiphp_slot

If the slot unique number is passed as an additional argument to
acpiphp_register_hotplug_slot(), the 'sun' field in struct
acpiphp_slot is only used by ibm_[s|g]et_attention_status(),
but then it's more efficient to store it in struct slot.

Thus move the 'sun' field from struct acpiphp_slot to struct slot
changing its data type to unsigned int in the process, and redefine
acpiphp_register_hotplug_slot() to take the slot number as separate
argument.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>

show more ...

ACPI / hotplug / PCI: Register all devices under the given bridge

Rework register_slot() to create a struct acpiphp_func object for
every function it is called for and to create acpiphp

ACPI / hotplug / PCI: Register all devices under the given bridge

Rework register_slot() to create a struct acpiphp_func object for
every function it is called for and to create acpiphp slots for all
of them. Although acpiphp_register_hotplug_slot() is only called for
the slots whose functions are identified as "ejectable", so that user
space can manipulate them, the ACPIPHP notify handler,
handle_hotplug_event(), is now installed for all of the registered
functions (that aren't dock stations) and hotplug events may be
handled for all of them.

As a result, essentially, all PCI bridges represented by objects in
the ACPI namespace are now going to be "hotplug" bridges and that may
affect resources allocation in general, although it shouldn't lead to
problems.

This allows the code to be simplified substantially and addresses
the problem where bus check or device check notifications for some
PCI bridges or devices are not handled, because those devices are
not recognized as "ejectable" or there appear to be no "ejectable"
devices under those bridges.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>

show more ...

ACPI / hotplug / PCI: Refactor slot allocation code in register_slot()

To make the code in register_slot() a bit easier to follow, change
the way the slot allocation part is organized.

ACPI / hotplug / PCI: Refactor slot allocation code in register_slot()

To make the code in register_slot() a bit easier to follow, change
the way the slot allocation part is organized. Drop one local
variable that's not used any more after that modification.

This code change should not lead to any changes in behavior.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>

show more ...

ACPI / hotplug / PCI: Drop func field from struct acpiphp_bridge

Since the func pointer in struct acpiphp_context can always be used
instead of the func pointer in struct acpiphp_bridge,

ACPI / hotplug / PCI: Drop func field from struct acpiphp_bridge

Since the func pointer in struct acpiphp_context can always be used
instead of the func pointer in struct acpiphp_bridge, drop the
latter.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>

show more ...

ACPI / hotplug / PCI: Merge hotplug event handling functions

There are separate handling event functions for hotplug bridges and
for hotplug functions, but they may be combined into one

ACPI / hotplug / PCI: Merge hotplug event handling functions

There are separate handling event functions for hotplug bridges and
for hotplug functions, but they may be combined into one common
hotplug event handling function which simplifies the code slightly.

That also allows a theoretical bug to be dealt with which in
principle may occur if a hotplug bridge is on a dock station, because
in that case the bridge-specific notification should be used instead
of the function-specific one, but the dock station always uses the
latter.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>

show more ...

ACPI / hotplug / PCI: Pass hotplug context objects to event handlers

Modify handle_hotplug_event() to pass the entire context object
(instead of its fields individually) to work function

ACPI / hotplug / PCI: Pass hotplug context objects to event handlers

Modify handle_hotplug_event() to pass the entire context object
(instead of its fields individually) to work functions started by it.

This change makes the subsequent consolidation of the event handling
work functions a bit more straightforward.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>

show more ...

ACPI / hotplug / PCI: Rework acpiphp_handle_to_bridge()

Using the hotplug context objects introduced previously rework the
ACPI-based PCI hotplug (ACPIPHP) core code to get to acpiphp_br

ACPI / hotplug / PCI: Rework acpiphp_handle_to_bridge()

Using the hotplug context objects introduced previously rework the
ACPI-based PCI hotplug (ACPIPHP) core code to get to acpiphp_bridge
objects associated with hotplug bridges from those context objects
rather than from the global list of hotplug bridges.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>

show more ...

ACPI / hotplug / PCI: Unified notify handler for hotplug events

Using the hotplug context objects introduced previously rework the
ACPI-based PCI hotplug (ACPIPHP) core code so that all

ACPI / hotplug / PCI: Unified notify handler for hotplug events

Using the hotplug context objects introduced previously rework the
ACPI-based PCI hotplug (ACPIPHP) core code so that all notifications
for ACPI device objects corresponding to the hotplug PCI devices are
handled by one function, handle_hotplug_event(), which recognizes
whether it has to handle a bridge or a function.

In addition to code size reduction it allows some ugly pieces of code
where notify handlers have to be uninstalled and installed again to
go away. Moreover, it fixes a theoretically possible race between
handle_hotplug_event() and free_bridge() tearing down data structures
for the same handle.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>

show more ...

ACPI / hotplug / PCI: Hotplug context objects for bridges and functions

When either a new hotplug bridge or a new hotplug function is added
by the ACPI-based PCI hotplug (ACPIPHP) code,

ACPI / hotplug / PCI: Hotplug context objects for bridges and functions

When either a new hotplug bridge or a new hotplug function is added
by the ACPI-based PCI hotplug (ACPIPHP) code, attach a context object
to its ACPI handle to store hotplug-related information in it. To
start with, put the handle's bridge and function pointers into that
object. Count references to the context objects and drop them when
they are not needed any more.

First of all, this makes it possible to find out if the given bridge
has been registered as a function already in a much more
straightforward way and acpiphp_bridge_handle_to_function() can be
dropped (Yay!).

This also will allow some more simplifications to be made going
forward.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>

show more ...

ACPI / hotplug / PCI: Always return success after adding a function

When a new ACPIPHP function is added by register_slot() and the
notify handler cannot be installed for it, register_sl

ACPI / hotplug / PCI: Always return success after adding a function

When a new ACPIPHP function is added by register_slot() and the
notify handler cannot be installed for it, register_slot() returns an
error status without cleaning up, which causes the entire namespace
walk in acpiphp_enumerate_slots() to be aborted, although it still
may be possible to successfully install the function notify handler
for other device objects under the given brigde.

To address this issue make register_slot() return success after
a new function has been added, even if the addition of the notify
handler for it has failed.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>

show more ...

ACPI / hotplug / PCI: Consolidate acpiphp_enumerate_slots()

The acpiphp_enumerate_slots() function is now split into two parts,
acpiphp_enumerate_slots() proper and init_bridge_misc() wh

ACPI / hotplug / PCI: Consolidate acpiphp_enumerate_slots()

The acpiphp_enumerate_slots() function is now split into two parts,
acpiphp_enumerate_slots() proper and init_bridge_misc() which is
only called by the former. If these functions are combined,
it is possible to make the code easier to follow and to clean up
the error handling (to prevent memory leaks on error from
happening in particular), so do that.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>

show more ...

ACPI / PCI: Make bus registration and unregistration symmetric

Since acpi_pci_slot_enumerate() and acpiphp_enumerate_slots() can get
the ACPI device handle they need from bus->bridge, it

ACPI / PCI: Make bus registration and unregistration symmetric

Since acpi_pci_slot_enumerate() and acpiphp_enumerate_slots() can get
the ACPI device handle they need from bus->bridge, it is not
necessary to pass that handle to them as an argument.

Drop the second argument of acpi_pci_slot_enumerate() and
acpiphp_enumerate_slots(), rework them to obtain the ACPI handle
from bus->bridge and make acpi_pci_add_bus() and
acpi_pci_remove_bus() entirely symmetrical.

Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>

show more ...

ACPI / dock / PCI: Drop ACPI dock notifier chain

The only user of the ACPI dock notifier chain is the ACPI-based PCI
hotplug (acpiphp) driver that uses it to carry out post-dock fixups

ACPI / dock / PCI: Drop ACPI dock notifier chain

The only user of the ACPI dock notifier chain is the ACPI-based PCI
hotplug (acpiphp) driver that uses it to carry out post-dock fixups
needed by some systems with broken _DCK. However, it is not
necessary to use a separate notifier chain for that, as it can be
simply replaced with a new callback in struct acpi_dock_ops.

For this reason, add a new .fixup() callback to struct acpi_dock_ops
and make hotplug_dock_devices() execute it for all dock devices with
hotplug operations registered. Accordingly, make acpiphp point that
callback to the function carrying out the post-dock fixups and
do not register a separate dock notifier for each device
registering dock operations. Finally, drop the ACPI dock notifier
chain that has no more users.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

show more ...

ACPI: simplify acpiphp driver with new helper functions

Use the new helper functions introduced previously to simplify the
ACPI-based PCI hotplug (acpiphp) driver.

[rjw: Changel

ACPI: simplify acpiphp driver with new helper functions

Use the new helper functions introduced previously to simplify the
ACPI-based PCI hotplug (acpiphp) driver.

[rjw: Changelog]
Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

show more ...

ACPI / dock / PCI: Synchronous handling of dock events for PCI devices

The interactions between the ACPI dock driver and the ACPI-based PCI
hotplug (acpiphp) are currently problematic be

ACPI / dock / PCI: Synchronous handling of dock events for PCI devices

The interactions between the ACPI dock driver and the ACPI-based PCI
hotplug (acpiphp) are currently problematic because of ordering
issues during hot-remove operations.

First of all, the current ACPI glue code expects that physical
devices will always be deleted before deleting the companion ACPI
device objects. Otherwise, acpi_unbind_one() will fail with a
warning message printed to the kernel log, for example:

[ 185.026073] usb usb5: Oops, 'acpi_handle' corrupt
[ 185.035150] pci 0000:1b:00.0: Oops, 'acpi_handle' corrupt
[ 185.035515] pci 0000:18:02.0: Oops, 'acpi_handle' corrupt
[ 180.013656] port1: Oops, 'acpi_handle' corrupt

This means, in particular, that struct pci_dev objects have to
be deleted before the struct acpi_device objects they are "glued"
with.

Now, the following happens the during the undocking of an ACPI-based
dock station:
1) hotplug_dock_devices() invokes registered hotplug callbacks to
destroy physical devices associated with the ACPI device objects
depending on the dock station. It calls dd->ops->handler() for
each of those device objects.
2) For PCI devices dd->ops->handler() points to
handle_hotplug_event_func() that queues up a separate work item
to execute _handle_hotplug_event_func() for the given device and
returns immediately. That work item will be executed later.
3) hotplug_dock_devices() calls dock_remove_acpi_device() for each
device depending on the dock station. This runs acpi_bus_trim()
for each of them, which causes the underlying ACPI device object
to be destroyed, but the work items queued up by
handle_hotplug_event_func() haven't been started yet.
4) _handle_hotplug_event_func() queued up in step 2) are executed
and cause the above failure to happen, because the PCI devices
they handle do not have the companion ACPI device objects any
more (those objects have been deleted in step 3).

The possible breakage doesn't end here, though, because
hotplug_dock_devices() may return before at least some of the
_handle_hotplug_event_func() work items spawned by it have a
chance to complete and then undock() will cause _DCK to be
evaluated and that will cause the devices handled by the
_handle_hotplug_event_func() to go away possibly while they are
being accessed.

This means that dd->ops->handler() for PCI devices should not point
to handle_hotplug_event_func(). Instead, it should point to a
function that will do the work of _handle_hotplug_event_func()
synchronously. For this reason, introduce such a function,
hotplug_event_func(), and modity acpiphp_dock_ops to point to
it as the handler.

Unfortunately, however, this is not sufficient, because if the dock
code were not changed further, hotplug_event_func() would now
deadlock with hotplug_dock_devices() that called it, since it would
run unregister_hotplug_dock_device() which in turn would attempt to
acquire the dock station's hp_lock mutex already acquired by
hotplug_dock_devices().

To resolve that deadlock use the observation that
unregister_hotplug_dock_device() won't need to acquire hp_lock
if PCI bridges the devices on the dock station depend on are
prevented from being removed prematurely while the first loop in
hotplug_dock_devices() is in progress.

To make that possible, introduce a mechanism by which the callers of
register_hotplug_dock_device() can provide "init" and "release"
routines that will be executed, respectively, during the addition
and removal of the physical device object associated with the
given ACPI device handle. Make acpiphp use two new functions,
acpiphp_dock_init() and acpiphp_dock_release(), that call
get_bridge() and put_bridge(), respectively, on the acpiphp bridge
holding the given device, for this purpose.

In addition to that, remove the dock station's list of
"hotplug devices" and make the dock code always walk the whole list
of "dependent devices" instead in such a way that the loops in
hotplug_dock_devices() and dock_event() (replacing the loops over
"hotplug devices") will take references to the list entries that
register_hotplug_dock_device() has been called for. That prevents
the "release" routines associated with those entries from being
called while the given entry is being processed and for PCI
devices this means that their bridges won't be removed (by a
concurrent thread) while hotplug_event_func() handling them is
being executed.

This change is based on two earlier patches from Jiang Liu.

References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=59501
Reported-and-tested-by: Alexander E. Patrakov <patrakov@gmail.com>
Tracked-down-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
Tested-by: Illya Klymov <xanf@xanf.me>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: 3.9+ <stable@vger.kernel.org>

show more ...

PCI / ACPI: Use boot-time resource allocation rules during hotplug

On x86 platforms, the kernel respects PCI resource assignments from
the BIOS and only reassigns resources for unassigne

PCI / ACPI: Use boot-time resource allocation rules during hotplug

On x86 platforms, the kernel respects PCI resource assignments from
the BIOS and only reassigns resources for unassigned BARs at boot
time. However, with the ACPI-based hotplug (acpiphp), it ignores the
BIOS' PCI resource assignments completely and reassigns all resources
by itself. This causes differences in PCI resource allocation
between boot time and runtime hotplug to occur, which is generally
undesirable and sometimes actively breaks things.

Namely, if there are enough resources, reassigning all PCI resources
during runtime hotplug should work, but it may fail if the resources
are constrained. This may happen, for instance, when some PCI
devices with huge MMIO BARs are involved in the runtime hotplug
operations, because the current PCI MMIO alignment algorithm may
waste huge chunks of MMIO address space in those cases.

On the Alexander's Sony VAIO VPCZ23A4R the BIOS allocates limited
MMIO resources for the dock station which contains a device
(graphics adapter) with a 256MB MMIO BAR. An attempt to reassign
that during runtime hotplug causes the dock station MMIO window to be
exhausted and acpiphp fails to allocate resources for the majority
of devices on the dock station as a result.

To prevent that from happening, modify acpiphp to follow the boot
time resources allocation behavior so that the BIOS' resource
assignments are respected during runtime hotplug too.

[rjw: Changelog]
References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56531
Reported-and-tested-by: Alexander E. Patrakov <patrakov@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Illya Klymov <xanf@xanf.me>
Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: 3.9+ <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

show more ...

PCI: acpiphp: Re-enumerate devices when host bridge receives Bus Check

When a PCI host bridge device receives a Bus Check notification, we
must re-enumerate starting with the bridge to d

PCI: acpiphp: Re-enumerate devices when host bridge receives Bus Check

When a PCI host bridge device receives a Bus Check notification, we
must re-enumerate starting with the bridge to discover changes (devices
that have been added or removed).

Prior to 668192b678 ("PCI: acpiphp: Move host bridge hotplug to
pci_root.c"), this happened in _handle_hotplug_event_bridge(). After that
commit, _handle_hotplug_event_bridge() is not installed for host bridges,
and the host bridge notify handler, _handle_hotplug_event_root() did not
re-enumerate.

This patch adds re-enumeration to _handle_hotplug_event_root().

This fixes cases where we don't notice the addition or removal of
PCI devices, e.g., the PCI-to-USB ExpressCard in the bugzilla below.

[bhelgaas: changelog, references]
Reference: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CAAh6nkmbKR3HTqm5ommevsBwhL_u0N8Rk7Wsms_LfP=nBgKNew@mail.gmail.com
Reference: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57961
Reported-by: Gavin Guo <tuffkidtt@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Gavin Guo <tuffkidtt@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # v3.9+

show more ...

PCI: acpiphp: Protect acpiphp data structures from concurrent updates

Now acpiphp_enumerate_slots() and acpiphp_remove_slots() may be invoked
concurrently by the PCI core, so add a bridg

PCI: acpiphp: Protect acpiphp data structures from concurrent updates

Now acpiphp_enumerate_slots() and acpiphp_remove_slots() may be invoked
concurrently by the PCI core, so add a bridge_mutex and reference count
mechanism to protect acpiphp bridge/slot/function data structures.

To avoid deadlock, handle_hotplug_event_bridge() will requeue the
hotplug event onto the kacpi_hotplug_wq by calling alloc_acpi_hp_work().
But the workaround has introduced a minor race window because the
'bridge' passed to _handle_hotplug_event_bridge() may have already been
destroyed when _handle_hotplug_event_bridge() is actually executed by
the kacpi_hotplug_wq. So hold a reference count on the passed 'bridge'.
Fix the same issue for handle_hotplug_event_func() too.

Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Cc: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>

show more ...

PCI: acpiphp: Use normal list to simplify implementation

Use normal list for struct acpiphp_slot to simplify implementation.

Signed-off-by: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>
S

PCI: acpiphp: Use normal list to simplify implementation

Use normal list for struct acpiphp_slot to simplify implementation.

Signed-off-by: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Cc: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>

show more ...

PCI: acpiphp: Do not use ACPI PCI subdriver mechanism

Previously the acpiphp driver registered itself as an ACPI PCI subdriver,
so its callbacks were invoked when creating/destroying PCI

PCI: acpiphp: Do not use ACPI PCI subdriver mechanism

Previously the acpiphp driver registered itself as an ACPI PCI subdriver,
so its callbacks were invoked when creating/destroying PCI root
buses to manage ACPI-based PCI hotplug slots. But it doesn't handle
P2P bridge hotplug events, so it will cause strange behaviour if there
are hotplug slots associated with a hot-removed P2P bridge.

This patch fixes this issue by:
1) Directly hooking into PCI core to update hotplug slot devices when
creating/destroying PCI buses through:
pci_{add|remove}_bus() -> acpi_pci_{add|remove}_bus()
2) Getting rid of unused ACPI PCI subdriver-related code

It also cleans up unused code in the acpiphp driver.

[bhelgaas: keep acpi_pci_add_bus() stub for CONFIG_ACPI=n]
Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Cc: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>

show more ...

PCI: acpiphp: Replace local macros with standard ACPI macros

Replace local defined macros (ACPI_STA_xxx) with standard ACPI macros
(ACPI_STA_DEVICE_xxx).

Signed-off-by: Jiang Li

PCI: acpiphp: Replace local macros with standard ACPI macros

Replace local defined macros (ACPI_STA_xxx) with standard ACPI macros
(ACPI_STA_DEVICE_xxx).

Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Cc: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>

show more ...

PCI: acpiphp: Remove all functions even if function 0 doesn't exist

Currently function disable_device() detects slot state by checking
existence of PCI function 0. It's unreliable becau

PCI: acpiphp: Remove all functions even if function 0 doesn't exist

Currently function disable_device() detects slot state by checking
existence of PCI function 0. It's unreliable because the PCI device
for function 0 may be removed through the sysfs interface. If that
happens, it will cause powering off a hotplug slot without destroying
all PCI devices.

On the other hand, it won't hurt us except wasting some computation
power if the check is removed, because all code of disable_device()
is self-protected. So remove the check.

Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Cc: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>

show more ...

PCI: acpiphp: Use list_for_each_entry_safe() in acpiphp_sanitize_bus()

Function acpiphp_sanitize_bus() may call pci_stop_and_remove_bus_device(),
which in turn may remove device from bus

PCI: acpiphp: Use list_for_each_entry_safe() in acpiphp_sanitize_bus()

Function acpiphp_sanitize_bus() may call pci_stop_and_remove_bus_device(),
which in turn may remove device from bus->devices list. So walk the
bus->devices list with list_for_each_entry_safe().

Signed-off-by: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Cc: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>

show more ...