net/mlx5: E-switch, store eswitch pointer before registering devlink_param

[ Upstream commit 0553e753ea9ee724acaf6b3dfc7354702af83567 ]

Next patch will move devlink register to be first. Therefore,

net/mlx5: E-switch, store eswitch pointer before registering devlink_param

[ Upstream commit 0553e753ea9ee724acaf6b3dfc7354702af83567 ]

Next patch will move devlink register to be first. Therefore, whenever
mlx5 will register a param, the user will be notified.
In order to notify the user, devlink is using the get() callback of
the param. Hence, resources that are being used by the get() callback
must be set before the devlink param is registered.

Therefore, store eswitch pointer inside mdev before registering the
param.

Signed-off-by: Shay Drory <shayd@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Moshe Shemesh <moshe@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240409190820.227554-2-tariqt@nvidia.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

show more ...

net/mlx5: E-switch, store eswitch pointer before registering devlink_param

[ Upstream commit 0553e753ea9ee724acaf6b3dfc7354702af83567 ]

Next patch will move devlink register to be first. Therefore,

net/mlx5: E-switch, store eswitch pointer before registering devlink_param

[ Upstream commit 0553e753ea9ee724acaf6b3dfc7354702af83567 ]

Next patch will move devlink register to be first. Therefore, whenever
mlx5 will register a param, the user will be notified.
In order to notify the user, devlink is using the get() callback of
the param. Hence, resources that are being used by the get() callback
must be set before the devlink param is registered.

Therefore, store eswitch pointer inside mdev before registering the
param.

Signed-off-by: Shay Drory <shayd@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Moshe Shemesh <moshe@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240409190820.227554-2-tariqt@nvidia.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

show more ...

net/mlx5: E-switch, store eswitch pointer before registering devlink_param

[ Upstream commit 0553e753ea9ee724acaf6b3dfc7354702af83567 ]

Next patch will move devlink register to be first. Therefore,

net/mlx5: E-switch, store eswitch pointer before registering devlink_param

[ Upstream commit 0553e753ea9ee724acaf6b3dfc7354702af83567 ]

Next patch will move devlink register to be first. Therefore, whenever
mlx5 will register a param, the user will be notified.
In order to notify the user, devlink is using the get() callback of
the param. Hence, resources that are being used by the get() callback
must be set before the devlink param is registered.

Therefore, store eswitch pointer inside mdev before registering the
param.

Signed-off-by: Shay Drory <shayd@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Moshe Shemesh <moshe@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240409190820.227554-2-tariqt@nvidia.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

show more ...

net/mlx5: E-switch, store eswitch pointer before registering devlink_param

[ Upstream commit 0553e753ea9ee724acaf6b3dfc7354702af83567 ]

Next patch will move devlink register to be first. Therefore,

net/mlx5: E-switch, store eswitch pointer before registering devlink_param

[ Upstream commit 0553e753ea9ee724acaf6b3dfc7354702af83567 ]

Next patch will move devlink register to be first. Therefore, whenever
mlx5 will register a param, the user will be notified.
In order to notify the user, devlink is using the get() callback of
the param. Hence, resources that are being used by the get() callback
must be set before the devlink param is registered.

Therefore, store eswitch pointer inside mdev before registering the
param.

Signed-off-by: Shay Drory <shayd@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Moshe Shemesh <moshe@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240409190820.227554-2-tariqt@nvidia.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

show more ...

net/mlx5: E-switch, store eswitch pointer before registering devlink_param

[ Upstream commit 0553e753ea9ee724acaf6b3dfc7354702af83567 ]

Next patch will move devlink register to be first. Therefore,

net/mlx5: E-switch, store eswitch pointer before registering devlink_param

[ Upstream commit 0553e753ea9ee724acaf6b3dfc7354702af83567 ]

Next patch will move devlink register to be first. Therefore, whenever
mlx5 will register a param, the user will be notified.
In order to notify the user, devlink is using the get() callback of
the param. Hence, resources that are being used by the get() callback
must be set before the devlink param is registered.

Therefore, store eswitch pointer inside mdev before registering the
param.

Signed-off-by: Shay Drory <shayd@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Moshe Shemesh <moshe@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240409190820.227554-2-tariqt@nvidia.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

show more ...

net/mlx5: E-switch, Change flow rule destination checking

[ Upstream commit 85ea2c5c5ef5f24fe6e6e7028ddd90be1cb5d27e ]

The checking in the cited commit is not accurate. In the common case,
VF desti

net/mlx5: E-switch, Change flow rule destination checking

[ Upstream commit 85ea2c5c5ef5f24fe6e6e7028ddd90be1cb5d27e ]

The checking in the cited commit is not accurate. In the common case,
VF destination is internal, and uplink destination is external.
However, uplink destination with packet reformat is considered as
internal because firmware uses LB+hairpin to support it. Update the
checking so header rewrite rules with both internal and external
destinations are not allowed.

Fixes: e0e22d59b47a ("net/mlx5: E-switch, Add checking for flow rule destinations")
Signed-off-by: Jianbo Liu <jianbol@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Rahul Rameshbabu <rrameshbabu@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

show more ...

Revert "net/mlx5: Block entering switchdev mode with ns inconsistency"

[ Upstream commit 8deeefb24786ea7950b37bde4516b286c877db00 ]

This reverts commit 662404b24a4c4d839839ed25e3097571f5938b9b.
The

Revert "net/mlx5: Block entering switchdev mode with ns inconsistency"

[ Upstream commit 8deeefb24786ea7950b37bde4516b286c877db00 ]

This reverts commit 662404b24a4c4d839839ed25e3097571f5938b9b.
The revert is required due to the suspicion it is not good for anything
and cause crash.

Fixes: 662404b24a4c ("net/mlx5e: Block entering switchdev mode with ns inconsistency")
Signed-off-by: Gavin Li <gavinl@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

show more ...

net/mlx5: Refactor mlx5_flow_destination->rep pointer to vport num

[ Upstream commit 04ad04e4fdd10f92ef4f2b3f6227ec9824682197 ]

Currently the destination rep pointer is only used for comparisons or

net/mlx5: Refactor mlx5_flow_destination->rep pointer to vport num

[ Upstream commit 04ad04e4fdd10f92ef4f2b3f6227ec9824682197 ]

Currently the destination rep pointer is only used for comparisons or to
obtain vport number from it. Since it is used both during flow creation and
deletion it may point to representor of another eswitch instance which can
be deallocated during driver unload even when there are rules pointing to
it[0]. Refactor the code to store vport number and 'valid' flag instead of
the representor pointer.

[0]:
[176805.886303] ==================================================================
[176805.889433] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in esw_cleanup_dests+0x390/0x440 [mlx5_core]
[176805.892981] Read of size 2 at addr ffff888155090aa0 by task modprobe/27280

[176805.895462] CPU: 3 PID: 27280 Comm: modprobe Tainted: G B 6.6.0-rc3+ #1
[176805.896771] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.13.0-0-gf21b5a4aeb02-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
[176805.898514] Call Trace:
[176805.899026] <TASK>
[176805.899519] dump_stack_lvl+0x33/0x50
[176805.900221] print_report+0xc2/0x610
[176805.900893] ? mlx5_chains_put_table+0x33d/0x8d0 [mlx5_core]
[176805.901897] ? esw_cleanup_dests+0x390/0x440 [mlx5_core]
[176805.902852] kasan_report+0xac/0xe0
[176805.903509] ? esw_cleanup_dests+0x390/0x440 [mlx5_core]
[176805.904461] esw_cleanup_dests+0x390/0x440 [mlx5_core]
[176805.905223] __mlx5_eswitch_del_rule+0x1ae/0x460 [mlx5_core]
[176805.906044] ? esw_cleanup_dests+0x440/0x440 [mlx5_core]
[176805.906822] ? xas_find_conflict+0x420/0x420
[176805.907496] ? down_read+0x11e/0x200
[176805.908046] mlx5e_tc_rule_unoffload+0xc4/0x2a0 [mlx5_core]
[176805.908844] mlx5e_tc_del_fdb_flow+0x7da/0xb10 [mlx5_core]
[176805.909597] mlx5e_flow_put+0x4b/0x80 [mlx5_core]
[176805.910275] mlx5e_delete_flower+0x5b4/0xb70 [mlx5_core]
[176805.911010] tc_setup_cb_reoffload+0x27/0xb0
[176805.911648] fl_reoffload+0x62d/0x900 [cls_flower]
[176805.912313] ? mlx5e_rep_indr_block_unbind+0xd0/0xd0 [mlx5_core]
[176805.913151] ? __fl_put+0x230/0x230 [cls_flower]
[176805.913768] ? filter_irq_stacks+0x90/0x90
[176805.914335] ? kasan_save_stack+0x1e/0x40
[176805.914893] ? kasan_set_track+0x21/0x30
[176805.915484] ? kasan_save_free_info+0x27/0x40
[176805.916105] tcf_block_playback_offloads+0x79/0x1f0
[176805.916773] ? mlx5e_rep_indr_block_unbind+0xd0/0xd0 [mlx5_core]
[176805.917647] tcf_block_unbind+0x12d/0x330
[176805.918239] tcf_block_offload_cmd.isra.0+0x24e/0x320
[176805.918953] ? tcf_block_bind+0x770/0x770
[176805.919551] ? _raw_read_unlock_irqrestore+0x30/0x30
[176805.920236] ? mutex_lock+0x7d/0xd0
[176805.920735] ? mutex_unlock+0x80/0xd0
[176805.921255] tcf_block_offload_unbind+0xa5/0x120
[176805.921909] __tcf_block_put+0xc2/0x2d0
[176805.922467] ingress_destroy+0xf4/0x3d0 [sch_ingress]
[176805.923178] __qdisc_destroy+0x9d/0x280
[176805.923741] dev_shutdown+0x1c6/0x330
[176805.924295] unregister_netdevice_many_notify+0x6ef/0x1500
[176805.925034] ? netdev_freemem+0x50/0x50
[176805.925610] ? _raw_spin_lock_irq+0x7b/0xd0
[176805.926235] ? _raw_spin_lock_bh+0xe0/0xe0
[176805.926849] unregister_netdevice_queue+0x1e0/0x280
[176805.927592] ? unregister_netdevice_many+0x10/0x10
[176805.928275] unregister_netdev+0x18/0x20
[176805.928835] mlx5e_vport_rep_unload+0xc0/0x200 [mlx5_core]
[176805.929608] mlx5_esw_offloads_unload_rep+0x9d/0xc0 [mlx5_core]
[176805.930492] mlx5_eswitch_unload_vf_vports+0x108/0x1a0 [mlx5_core]
[176805.931422] ? mlx5_eswitch_unload_sf_vport+0x50/0x50 [mlx5_core]
[176805.932304] ? rwsem_down_write_slowpath+0x11f0/0x11f0
[176805.932987] mlx5_eswitch_disable_sriov+0x6f9/0xa60 [mlx5_core]
[176805.933807] ? mlx5_core_disable_hca+0xe1/0x130 [mlx5_core]
[176805.934576] ? mlx5_eswitch_disable_locked+0x580/0x580 [mlx5_core]
[176805.935463] mlx5_device_disable_sriov+0x138/0x490 [mlx5_core]
[176805.936308] mlx5_sriov_disable+0x8c/0xb0 [mlx5_core]
[176805.937063] remove_one+0x7f/0x210 [mlx5_core]
[176805.937711] pci_device_remove+0x96/0x1c0
[176805.938289] device_release_driver_internal+0x361/0x520
[176805.938981] ? kobject_put+0x5c/0x330
[176805.939553] driver_detach+0xd7/0x1d0
[176805.940101] bus_remove_driver+0x11f/0x290
[176805.943847] pci_unregister_driver+0x23/0x1f0
[176805.944505] mlx5_cleanup+0xc/0x20 [mlx5_core]
[176805.945189] __x64_sys_delete_module+0x2b3/0x450
[176805.945837] ? module_flags+0x300/0x300
[176805.946377] ? dput+0xc2/0x830
[176805.946848] ? __kasan_record_aux_stack+0x9c/0xb0
[176805.947555] ? __call_rcu_common.constprop.0+0x46c/0xb50
[176805.948338] ? fpregs_assert_state_consistent+0x1d/0xa0
[176805.949055] ? exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x30/0x120
[176805.949713] do_syscall_64+0x3d/0x90
[176805.950226] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0
[176805.950904] RIP: 0033:0x7f7f42c3f5ab
[176805.951462] Code: 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d 75 a8 1b 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48 83 c8 ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 90 f3 0f 1e fa b8 b0 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d 45 a8 1b 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48
[176805.953710] RSP: 002b:00007fff07dc9d08 EFLAGS: 00000206 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000b0
[176805.954691] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000055b6e91c01e0 RCX: 00007f7f42c3f5ab
[176805.955691] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000800 RDI: 000055b6e91c0248
[176805.956662] RBP: 000055b6e91c01e0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
[176805.957601] R10: 00007f7f42d9eac0 R11: 0000000000000206 R12: 000055b6e91c0248
[176805.958593] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 000055b6e91bfb38 R15: 0000000000000000
[176805.959599] </TASK>

[176805.960324] Allocated by task 20490:
[176805.960893] kasan_save_stack+0x1e/0x40
[176805.961463] kasan_set_track+0x21/0x30
[176805.962019] __kasan_kmalloc+0x77/0x90
[176805.962554] esw_offloads_init+0x1bb/0x480 [mlx5_core]
[176805.963318] mlx5_eswitch_init+0xc70/0x15c0 [mlx5_core]
[176805.964092] mlx5_init_one_devl_locked+0x366/0x1230 [mlx5_core]
[176805.964902] probe_one+0x6f7/0xc90 [mlx5_core]
[176805.965541] local_pci_probe+0xd7/0x180
[176805.966075] pci_device_probe+0x231/0x6f0
[176805.966631] really_probe+0x1d4/0xb50
[176805.967179] __driver_probe_device+0x18d/0x450
[176805.967810] driver_probe_device+0x49/0x120
[176805.968431] __driver_attach+0x1fb/0x490
[176805.968976] bus_for_each_dev+0xed/0x170
[176805.969560] bus_add_driver+0x21a/0x570
[176805.970124] driver_register+0x133/0x460
[176805.970684] 0xffffffffa0678065
[176805.971180] do_one_initcall+0x92/0x2b0
[176805.971744] do_init_module+0x22d/0x720
[176805.972318] load_module+0x58c3/0x63b0
[176805.972847] init_module_from_file+0xd2/0x130
[176805.973441] __x64_sys_finit_module+0x389/0x7c0
[176805.974045] do_syscall_64+0x3d/0x90
[176805.974556] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0

[176805.975566] Freed by task 27280:
[176805.976077] kasan_save_stack+0x1e/0x40
[176805.976655] kasan_set_track+0x21/0x30
[176805.977221] kasan_save_free_info+0x27/0x40
[176805.977834] ____kasan_slab_free+0x11a/0x1b0
[176805.978505] __kmem_cache_free+0x163/0x2d0
[176805.979113] esw_offloads_cleanup_reps+0xb8/0x120 [mlx5_core]
[176805.979963] mlx5_eswitch_cleanup+0x182/0x270 [mlx5_core]
[176805.980763] mlx5_cleanup_once+0x9a/0x1e0 [mlx5_core]
[176805.981477] mlx5_uninit_one+0xa9/0x180 [mlx5_core]
[176805.982196] remove_one+0x8f/0x210 [mlx5_core]
[176805.982868] pci_device_remove+0x96/0x1c0
[176805.983461] device_release_driver_internal+0x361/0x520
[176805.984169] driver_detach+0xd7/0x1d0
[176805.984702] bus_remove_driver+0x11f/0x290
[176805.985261] pci_unregister_driver+0x23/0x1f0
[176805.985847] mlx5_cleanup+0xc/0x20 [mlx5_core]
[176805.986483] __x64_sys_delete_module+0x2b3/0x450
[176805.987126] do_syscall_64+0x3d/0x90
[176805.987665] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0

[176805.988667] Last potentially related work creation:
[176805.989305] kasan_save_stack+0x1e/0x40
[176805.989839] __kasan_record_aux_stack+0x9c/0xb0
[176805.990443] kvfree_call_rcu+0x84/0xa30
[176805.990973] clean_xps_maps+0x265/0x6e0
[176805.991547] netif_reset_xps_queues.part.0+0x3f/0x80
[176805.992226] unregister_netdevice_many_notify+0xfcf/0x1500
[176805.992966] unregister_netdevice_queue+0x1e0/0x280
[176805.993638] unregister_netdev+0x18/0x20
[176805.994205] mlx5e_remove+0xba/0x1e0 [mlx5_core]
[176805.994872] auxiliary_bus_remove+0x52/0x70
[176805.995490] device_release_driver_internal+0x361/0x520
[176805.996196] bus_remove_device+0x1e1/0x3d0
[176805.996767] device_del+0x390/0x980
[176805.997270] mlx5_rescan_drivers_locked.part.0+0x130/0x540 [mlx5_core]
[176805.998195] mlx5_unregister_device+0x77/0xc0 [mlx5_core]
[176805.998989] mlx5_uninit_one+0x41/0x180 [mlx5_core]
[176805.999719] remove_one+0x8f/0x210 [mlx5_core]
[176806.000387] pci_device_remove+0x96/0x1c0
[176806.000938] device_release_driver_internal+0x361/0x520
[176806.001612] unbind_store+0xd8/0xf0
[176806.002108] kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x2c0/0x440
[176806.002748] vfs_write+0x725/0xba0
[176806.003294] ksys_write+0xed/0x1c0
[176806.003823] do_syscall_64+0x3d/0x90
[176806.004357] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0

[176806.005317] The buggy address belongs to the object at ffff888155090a80
which belongs to the cache kmalloc-64 of size 64
[176806.006774] The buggy address is located 32 bytes inside of
freed 64-byte region [ffff888155090a80, ffff888155090ac0)

[176806.008773] The buggy address belongs to the physical page:
[176806.009480] page:00000000a407e0e6 refcount:1 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x0 pfn:0x155090
[176806.010633] flags: 0x200000000000800(slab|node=0|zone=2)
[176806.011352] page_type: 0xffffffff()
[176806.011905] raw: 0200000000000800 ffff888100042640 ffffea000422b1c0 dead000000000004
[176806.012949] raw: 0000000000000000 0000000000200020 00000001ffffffff 0000000000000000
[176806.013933] page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected

[176806.014935] Memory state around the buggy address:
[176806.015601] ffff888155090980: fa fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc
[176806.016568] ffff888155090a00: fa fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc
[176806.017497] >ffff888155090a80: fa fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc
[176806.018438] ^
[176806.019007] ffff888155090b00: fa fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc
[176806.020001] ffff888155090b80: fa fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc
[176806.020996] ==================================================================

Fixes: a508728a4c8b ("net/mlx5e: VF tunnel RX traffic offloading")
Signed-off-by: Vlad Buslov <vladbu@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Roi Dayan <roid@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

show more ...

net/mlx5e: Fix overrun reported by coverity

[ Upstream commit da75fa542873e5f7d7f615566c0b00042d8a0437 ]

Coverity Scan reports the following issue. But it's impossible that
mlx5_get_dev_index retur

net/mlx5e: Fix overrun reported by coverity

[ Upstream commit da75fa542873e5f7d7f615566c0b00042d8a0437 ]

Coverity Scan reports the following issue. But it's impossible that
mlx5_get_dev_index returns 7 for PF, even if the index is calculated
from PCI FUNC ID. So add the checking to make coverity slience.

CID 610894 (#2 of 2): Out-of-bounds write (OVERRUN)
Overrunning array esw->fdb_table.offloads.peer_miss_rules of 4 8-byte
elements at element index 7 (byte offset 63) using index
mlx5_get_dev_index(peer_dev) (which evaluates to 7).

Fixes: 9bee385a6e39 ("net/mlx5: E-switch, refactor FDB miss rule add/remove")
Signed-off-by: Jianbo Liu <jianbol@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Roi Dayan <roid@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

show more ...

net/mlx5e: Check netdev pointer before checking its net ns

[ Upstream commit 7aaf975238c47b710fcc4eca0da1e7902a53abe2 ]

Previously, when comparing the net namespaces, the case where the netdev
does

net/mlx5e: Check netdev pointer before checking its net ns

[ Upstream commit 7aaf975238c47b710fcc4eca0da1e7902a53abe2 ]

Previously, when comparing the net namespaces, the case where the netdev
doesn't exist wasn't taken into account, and therefore can cause a crash.
In such a case, the comparing function should return false, as there is no
netdev->net to compare the devlink->net to.

Furthermore, this will result in an attempt to enter switchdev mode
without a netdev to fail, and which is the desired result as there is no
meaning in switchdev mode without a net device.

Fixes: 662404b24a4c ("net/mlx5e: Block entering switchdev mode with ns inconsistency")
Signed-off-by: Gavin Li <gavinl@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Gavi Teitz <gavi@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

show more ...

net/mlx5e: Reduce eswitch mode_lock protection context

[ Upstream commit baac8351f74c543896b8fd40138b7ad9365587a3 ]

Currently eswitch mode_lock is so heavy, for example, it's locked
during the whol

net/mlx5e: Reduce eswitch mode_lock protection context

[ Upstream commit baac8351f74c543896b8fd40138b7ad9365587a3 ]

Currently eswitch mode_lock is so heavy, for example, it's locked
during the whole process of the mode change, which may need to hold
other locks. As the mode_lock is also used by IPSec to block mode and
encap change now, it is easy to cause lock dependency.

Since some of protections are also done by devlink lock, the eswitch
mode_lock is not needed at those places, and thus the possibility of
lockdep issue is reduced.

Fixes: c8e350e62fc5 ("net/mlx5e: Make TC and IPsec offloads mutually exclusive on a netdev")
Signed-off-by: Jianbo Liu <jianbol@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

show more ...

net/mlx5e: Don't modify the peer sent-to-vport rules for IPSec offload

[ Upstream commit bdf788cf224f61c20a01c58c00685d394d57887f ]

As IPSec packet offload in switchdev mode is not supported with L

net/mlx5e: Don't modify the peer sent-to-vport rules for IPSec offload

[ Upstream commit bdf788cf224f61c20a01c58c00685d394d57887f ]

As IPSec packet offload in switchdev mode is not supported with LAG,
it's unnecessary to modify those sent-to-vport rules to the peer eswitch.

Fixes: c6c2bf5db4ea ("net/mlx5e: Support IPsec packet offload for TX in switchdev mode")
Signed-off-by: Jianbo Liu <jianbol@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Roi Dayan <roid@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231114215846.5902-9-saeed@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

show more ...

mlx5/core: E-Switch, Create ACL FT for eswitch manager in switchdev mode

ACL flow table is required in switchdev mode when metadata is enabled,
driver creates such table when loading each vport. How

mlx5/core: E-Switch, Create ACL FT for eswitch manager in switchdev mode

ACL flow table is required in switchdev mode when metadata is enabled,
driver creates such table when loading each vport. However, not every
vport is loaded in switchdev mode. Such as ECPF if it's the eswitch manager.
In this case, ACL flow table is still needed.

To make it modularized, create ACL flow table for eswitch manager as
default and skip such operations when loading manager vport.

Also, there is no need to load the eswitch manager vport in switchdev mode.
This means there is no need to load it on regular connect-x HCAs where
the PF is the eswitch manager. This will avoid creating duplicate ACL
flow table for host PF vport.

Fixes: 29bcb6e4fe70 ("net/mlx5e: E-Switch, Use metadata for vport matching in send-to-vport rules")
Fixes: eb8e9fae0a22 ("mlx5/core: E-Switch, Allocate ECPF vport if it's an eswitch manager")
Fixes: 5019833d661f ("net/mlx5: E-switch, Introduce helper function to enable/disable vports")
Signed-off-by: Bodong Wang <bodong@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Bloch <mbloch@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

show more ...

net/mlx5: Implement devlink port function cmds to control ipsec_packet

Implement devlink port function commands to enable / disable IPsec
packet offloads. This is used to control the IPsec capabilit

net/mlx5: Implement devlink port function cmds to control ipsec_packet

Implement devlink port function commands to enable / disable IPsec
packet offloads. This is used to control the IPsec capability of the
device.

When ipsec_offload is enabled for a VF, it prevents adding IPsec packet
offloads on the PF, because the two cannot be active simultaneously due
to HW constraints. Conversely, if there are any active IPsec packet
offloads on the PF, it's not allowed to enable ipsec_packet on a VF,
until PF IPsec offloads are cleared.

Signed-off-by: Dima Chumak <dchumak@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230825062836.103744-9-saeed@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>

show more ...

net/mlx5: Implement devlink port function cmds to control ipsec_crypto

Implement devlink port function commands to enable / disable IPsec
crypto offloads. This is used to control the IPsec capabili

net/mlx5: Implement devlink port function cmds to control ipsec_crypto

Implement devlink port function commands to enable / disable IPsec
crypto offloads. This is used to control the IPsec capability of the
device.

When ipsec_crypto is enabled for a VF, it prevents adding IPsec crypto
offloads on the PF, because the two cannot be active simultaneously due
to HW constraints. Conversely, if there are any active IPsec crypto
offloads on the PF, it's not allowed to enable ipsec_crypto on a VF,
until PF IPsec offloads are cleared.

Signed-off-by: Dima Chumak <dchumak@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230825062836.103744-8-saeed@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>

show more ...

net/mlx5e: Rewrite IPsec vs. TC block interface

In the commit 366e46242b8e ("net/mlx5e: Make IPsec offload work together
with eswitch and TC"), new API to block IPsec vs. TC creation was introduced.

net/mlx5e: Rewrite IPsec vs. TC block interface

In the commit 366e46242b8e ("net/mlx5e: Make IPsec offload work together
with eswitch and TC"), new API to block IPsec vs. TC creation was introduced.

Internally, that API used devlink lock to avoid races with userspace, but it is
not really needed as dev->priv.eswitch is stable and can't be changed. So remove
dependency on devlink lock and move block encap code back to its original place.

Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230825062836.103744-5-saeed@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>

show more ...

net/mlx5: Drop extra layer of locks in IPsec

There is no need in holding devlink lock as it gives nothing
compared to already used write mode_lock.

Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com

net/mlx5: Drop extra layer of locks in IPsec

There is no need in holding devlink lock as it gives nothing
compared to already used write mode_lock.

Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230825062836.103744-4-saeed@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>

show more ...

net/mlx5: Store vport in struct mlx5_devlink_port and use it in port ops

Instead of using internal devlink_port->index to perform vport lookup in
every devlink port op, store the vport pointer to th

net/mlx5: Store vport in struct mlx5_devlink_port and use it in port ops

Instead of using internal devlink_port->index to perform vport lookup in
every devlink port op, store the vport pointer to the container struct
mlx5_devlink_port and use it directly in port ops.

Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Shay Drory <shayd@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>

show more ...

net/mlx5: Check vhca_resource_manager capability in each op and add extack msg

Since the follow-up patch is going to remove
mlx5_devlink_port_fn_get_vport() entirely, move the vhca_resource_manager

net/mlx5: Check vhca_resource_manager capability in each op and add extack msg

Since the follow-up patch is going to remove
mlx5_devlink_port_fn_get_vport() entirely, move the vhca_resource_manager
capability checking to individual ops. Add proper extack message
on the way.

Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Shay Drory <shayd@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>

show more ...

net/mlx5: Relax mlx5_devlink_eswitch_get() return value checking

If called from port ops, it is not needed to perform the checks in
mlx5_devlink_eswitch_get(). The reason is devlink port would not b

net/mlx5: Relax mlx5_devlink_eswitch_get() return value checking

If called from port ops, it is not needed to perform the checks in
mlx5_devlink_eswitch_get(). The reason is devlink port would not be
registered if the checks are not true. Introduce relaxed version
mlx5_devlink_eswitch_nocheck_get() and use it in port ops.

Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Shay Drory <shayd@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>

show more ...

net/mlx5: Return -EOPNOTSUPP in mlx5_devlink_port_fn_migratable_set() directly

Instead of initializing "err" variable, just return "-EOPNOTSUPP"
directly where it is needed.

Signed-off-by: Jiri Pir

net/mlx5: Return -EOPNOTSUPP in mlx5_devlink_port_fn_migratable_set() directly

Instead of initializing "err" variable, just return "-EOPNOTSUPP"
directly where it is needed.

Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Shay Drory <shayd@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>

show more ...

net/mlx5: Reduce number of vport lookups passing vport pointer instead of index

During devlink port init/cleanup and register/unregister calls, there
are many lookups of vport. Instead of passing vp

net/mlx5: Reduce number of vport lookups passing vport pointer instead of index

During devlink port init/cleanup and register/unregister calls, there
are many lookups of vport. Instead of passing vport_num as argument to
functions, pass the vport struct pointer directly and avoid repeated
lookups.

Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Shay Drory <shayd@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>

show more ...

net/mlx5: Embed struct devlink_port into driver structure

Struct devlink_port is usually embedded in a driver-specific struct
which allows to carry driver context to devlink port ops.

Introduce a c

net/mlx5: Embed struct devlink_port into driver structure

Struct devlink_port is usually embedded in a driver-specific struct
which allows to carry driver context to devlink port ops.

Introduce a container struct to include devlink_port struct
in preparation to also include driver context for devlink port ops.

Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Shay Drory <shayd@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>

show more ...

net/mlx5: Don't register ops for non-PF/VF/SF port and avoid checks in ops

Currently each PF/VF/SF devlink port op called into mlx5 code calls
is_port_function_supported() to check if the port is ei

net/mlx5: Don't register ops for non-PF/VF/SF port and avoid checks in ops

Currently each PF/VF/SF devlink port op called into mlx5 code calls
is_port_function_supported() to check if the port is either
PF, VF or SF. So make sure that the ops are registered with devlink
port only for those and avoid the is_port_function_supported() checks
in ops.

Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Shay Drory <shayd@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>

show more ...

net/mlx5: Remove no longer used mlx5_esw_offloads_sf_vport_enable/disable()

Since the previous patch removed the only users of these functions,
remove them.

Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.c

net/mlx5: Remove no longer used mlx5_esw_offloads_sf_vport_enable/disable()

Since the previous patch removed the only users of these functions,
remove them.

Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Shay Drory <shayd@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>

show more ...