|
Revision tags: v6.6.25, v6.6.24, v6.6.23, v6.6.16, v6.6.15, v6.6.14, v6.6.13, v6.6.12, v6.6.11, v6.6.10, v6.6.9, v6.6.8, v6.6.7, v6.6.6, v6.6.5, v6.6.4, v6.6.3, v6.6.2, v6.5.11, v6.6.1, v6.5.10, v6.6, v6.5.9, v6.5.8, v6.5.7, v6.5.6, v6.5.5, v6.5.4, v6.5.3, v6.5.2, v6.1.51, v6.5.1, v6.1.50, v6.5, v6.1.49, v6.1.48, v6.1.46, v6.1.45, v6.1.44, v6.1.43, v6.1.42, v6.1.41, v6.1.40, v6.1.39, v6.1.38, v6.1.37, v6.1.36, v6.4, v6.1.35, v6.1.34, v6.1.33, v6.1.32, v6.1.31, v6.1.30, v6.1.29, v6.1.28, v6.1.27, v6.1.26, v6.3, v6.1.25, v6.1.24, v6.1.23, v6.1.22, v6.1.21, v6.1.20 |
|
| #
cc8997c9 |
| 15-Mar-2023 |
Sindhu Devale <sindhu.devale@intel.com> |
RDMA/irdma: Refactor PBLE functions
Refactor PBLE functions using a bit mask to represent the PBLE level
desired versus 2 parameters use_pble and lvl_one_only which makes the
code confusing.
Signed
RDMA/irdma: Refactor PBLE functions
Refactor PBLE functions using a bit mask to represent the PBLE level
desired versus 2 parameters use_pble and lvl_one_only which makes the
code confusing.
Signed-off-by: Mustafa Ismail <mustafa.ismail@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sindhu Devale <sindhu.devale@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230315145305.955-5-shiraz.saleem@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: v6.1.19, v6.1.18, v6.1.17, v6.1.16, v6.1.15, v6.1.14, v6.1.13, v6.2, v6.1.12, v6.1.11, v6.1.10, v6.1.9, v6.1.8, v6.1.7, v6.1.6, v6.1.5, v6.0.19, v6.0.18, v6.1.4, v6.1.3, v6.0.17, v6.1.2, v6.0.16, v6.1.1, v6.0.15, v6.0.14, v6.0.13, v6.1, v6.0.12, v6.0.11, v6.0.10, v5.15.80, v6.0.9, v5.15.79, v6.0.8, v5.15.78, v6.0.7, v5.15.77, v5.15.76, v6.0.6, v6.0.5, v5.15.75, v6.0.4, v6.0.3, v6.0.2, v5.15.74, v5.15.73, v6.0.1, v5.15.72, v6.0, v5.15.71, v5.15.70, v5.15.69, v5.15.68, v5.15.67, v5.15.66, v5.15.65, v5.15.64, v5.15.63, v5.15.62, v5.15.61, v5.15.60, v5.15.59, v5.19, v5.15.58, v5.15.57, v5.15.56, v5.15.55, v5.15.54, v5.15.53, v5.15.52, v5.15.51, v5.15.50, v5.15.49, v5.15.48, v5.15.47, v5.15.46, v5.15.45, v5.15.44, v5.15.43, v5.15.42, v5.18, v5.15.41, v5.15.40, v5.15.39, v5.15.38, v5.15.37, v5.15.36, v5.15.35, v5.15.34, v5.15.33, v5.15.32, v5.15.31, v5.17, v5.15.30, v5.15.29, v5.15.28, v5.15.27, v5.15.26, v5.15.25 |
|
| #
2c4b14ea |
| 17-Feb-2022 |
Shiraz Saleem <shiraz.saleem@intel.com> |
RDMA/irdma: Remove enum irdma_status_code
Replace use of custom irdma_status_code with linux error codes.
Remove enum irdma_status_code and header in which its defined.
Link: https://lore.kernel.o
RDMA/irdma: Remove enum irdma_status_code
Replace use of custom irdma_status_code with linux error codes.
Remove enum irdma_status_code and header in which its defined.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220217151851.1518-2-shiraz.saleem@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Shiraz Saleem <shiraz.saleem@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: v5.15.24, v5.15.23, v5.15.22, v5.15.21, v5.15.20, v5.15.19, v5.15.18, v5.15.17, v5.4.173, v5.15.16, v5.15.15, v5.16, v5.15.10, v5.15.9, v5.15.8, v5.15.7 |
|
| #
117697cc |
| 05-Dec-2021 |
Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr> |
RDMA/irdma: Fix a potential memory allocation issue in 'irdma_prm_add_pble_mem()'
'pchunk->bitmapbuf' is a bitmap. Its size (in number of bits) is stored in
'pchunk->sizeofbitmap'.
When it is alloc
RDMA/irdma: Fix a potential memory allocation issue in 'irdma_prm_add_pble_mem()'
'pchunk->bitmapbuf' is a bitmap. Its size (in number of bits) is stored in
'pchunk->sizeofbitmap'.
When it is allocated, the size (in bytes) is computed by:
size_in_bits >> 3
There are 2 issues (numbers bellow assume that longs are 64 bits):
- there is no guarantee here that 'pchunk->bitmapmem.size' is modulo
BITS_PER_LONG but bitmaps are stored as longs
(sizeofbitmap=8 bits will only allocate 1 byte, instead of 8 (1 long))
- the number of bytes is computed with a shift, not a round up, so we
may allocate less memory than needed
(sizeofbitmap=65 bits will only allocate 8 bytes (i.e. 1 long), when 2
longs are needed = 16 bytes)
Fix both issues by using 'bitmap_zalloc()' and remove the useless
'bitmapmem' from 'struct irdma_chunk'.
While at it, remove some useless NULL test before calling
kfree/bitmap_free.
Fixes: 915cc7ac0f8e ("RDMA/irdma: Add miscellaneous utility definitions")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/5e670b640508e14b1869c3e8e4fb970d78cbe997.1638692171.git.christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr
Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
Reviewed-by: Shiraz Saleem <shiraz.saleem@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
show more ...
|
| #
1e11a39a |
| 07-Dec-2021 |
Shiraz Saleem <shiraz.saleem@intel.com> |
RDMA/irdma: Fix a user-after-free in add_pble_prm
When irdma_hmc_sd_one fails, 'chunk' is freed while its still on the PBLE
info list.
Add the chunk entry to the PBLE info list only after successfu
RDMA/irdma: Fix a user-after-free in add_pble_prm
When irdma_hmc_sd_one fails, 'chunk' is freed while its still on the PBLE
info list.
Add the chunk entry to the PBLE info list only after successful setting of
the SD in irdma_hmc_sd_one.
Fixes: e8c4dbc2fcac ("RDMA/irdma: Add PBLE resource manager")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211207152135.2192-1-shiraz.saleem@intel.com
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Shiraz Saleem <shiraz.saleem@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
show more ...
|
| #
b260dfed |
| 05-Dec-2021 |
Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr> |
RDMA/irdma: Fix a potential memory allocation issue in 'irdma_prm_add_pble_mem()'
[ Upstream commit 117697cc935b0ab04ec66274d8e64ccfebd7d0d2 ]
'pchunk->bitmapbuf' is a bitmap. Its size (in number o
RDMA/irdma: Fix a potential memory allocation issue in 'irdma_prm_add_pble_mem()'
[ Upstream commit 117697cc935b0ab04ec66274d8e64ccfebd7d0d2 ]
'pchunk->bitmapbuf' is a bitmap. Its size (in number of bits) is stored in
'pchunk->sizeofbitmap'.
When it is allocated, the size (in bytes) is computed by:
size_in_bits >> 3
There are 2 issues (numbers bellow assume that longs are 64 bits):
- there is no guarantee here that 'pchunk->bitmapmem.size' is modulo
BITS_PER_LONG but bitmaps are stored as longs
(sizeofbitmap=8 bits will only allocate 1 byte, instead of 8 (1 long))
- the number of bytes is computed with a shift, not a round up, so we
may allocate less memory than needed
(sizeofbitmap=65 bits will only allocate 8 bytes (i.e. 1 long), when 2
longs are needed = 16 bytes)
Fix both issues by using 'bitmap_zalloc()' and remove the useless
'bitmapmem' from 'struct irdma_chunk'.
While at it, remove some useless NULL test before calling
kfree/bitmap_free.
Fixes: 915cc7ac0f8e ("RDMA/irdma: Add miscellaneous utility definitions")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/5e670b640508e14b1869c3e8e4fb970d78cbe997.1638692171.git.christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr
Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
Reviewed-by: Shiraz Saleem <shiraz.saleem@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
show more ...
|
| #
11eebcf6 |
| 07-Dec-2021 |
Shiraz Saleem <shiraz.saleem@intel.com> |
RDMA/irdma: Fix a user-after-free in add_pble_prm
[ Upstream commit 1e11a39a82e95ce86f849f40dda0d9c0498cebd9 ]
When irdma_hmc_sd_one fails, 'chunk' is freed while its still on the PBLE
info list.
RDMA/irdma: Fix a user-after-free in add_pble_prm
[ Upstream commit 1e11a39a82e95ce86f849f40dda0d9c0498cebd9 ]
When irdma_hmc_sd_one fails, 'chunk' is freed while its still on the PBLE
info list.
Add the chunk entry to the PBLE info list only after successful setting of
the SD in irdma_hmc_sd_one.
Fixes: e8c4dbc2fcac ("RDMA/irdma: Add PBLE resource manager")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211207152135.2192-1-shiraz.saleem@intel.com
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Shiraz Saleem <shiraz.saleem@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: v5.15.6, v5.15.5, v5.15.4, v5.15.3, v5.15.2, v5.15.1, v5.15, v5.14.14, v5.14.13, v5.14.12, v5.14.11, v5.14.10, v5.14.9, v5.14.8, v5.14.7, v5.14.6, v5.10.67, v5.10.66, v5.14.5, v5.14.4, v5.10.65, v5.14.3, v5.10.64, v5.14.2, v5.10.63, v5.14.1, v5.10.62, v5.14, v5.10.61, v5.10.60, v5.10.53, v5.10.52, v5.10.51, v5.10.50, v5.10.49, v5.13, v5.10.46, v5.10.43 |
|
| #
2db7b2ea |
| 09-Jun-2021 |
Shiraz Saleem <shiraz.saleem@intel.com> |
RDMA/irdma: Store PBL info address a pointer type
The level1 PBL info address is stored as u64. This requires casting
through a uinptr_t before used as a pointer type.
And this leads to sparse war
RDMA/irdma: Store PBL info address a pointer type
The level1 PBL info address is stored as u64. This requires casting
through a uinptr_t before used as a pointer type.
And this leads to sparse warning such as this when uinptr_t is missing:
drivers/infiniband/hw/irdma/hw.c: In function 'irdma_destroy_virt_aeq':
drivers/infiniband/hw/irdma/hw.c:579:23: warning: cast to pointer from integer of different size [-Wint-to-pointer-cast]
579 | dma_addr_t *pg_arr = (dma_addr_t *)aeq->palloc.level1.addr;
This can be fixed using an intermediate uintptr_t, but rather it is better
to fix the structure irdm_pble_info to store the address as u64* and the
VA it is assigned in irdma_chunk as a void*. This greatly reduces the
casting on this address.
Fixes: 44d9e52977a1 ("RDMA/irdma: Implement device initialization definitions")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210609234924.938-1-shiraz.saleem@intel.com
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Shiraz Saleem <shiraz.saleem@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: v5.10.42 |
|
| #
e8c4dbc2 |
| 02-Jun-2021 |
Mustafa Ismail <mustafa.ismail@intel.com> |
RDMA/irdma: Add PBLE resource manager
Implement a Physical Buffer List Entry (PBLE) resource manager
to manage a pool of PBLE HMC resource objects.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210602205138.88
RDMA/irdma: Add PBLE resource manager
Implement a Physical Buffer List Entry (PBLE) resource manager
to manage a pool of PBLE HMC resource objects.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210602205138.889-9-shiraz.saleem@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Mustafa Ismail <mustafa.ismail@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Shiraz Saleem <shiraz.saleem@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
show more ...
|