drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_aal: Remove half completed incorrect struct header

Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):

drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_aal.c:39: warning: Function parameter or

drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_aal: Remove half completed incorrect struct header

Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):

drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_aal.c:39: warning: Function parameter or member 'clk' not described in 'mtk_disp_aal'
drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_aal.c:39: warning: Function parameter or member 'regs' not described in 'mtk_disp_aal'
drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_aal.c:39: warning: Function parameter or member 'cmdq_reg' not described in 'mtk_disp_aal'
drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_aal.c:39: warning: Function parameter or member 'data' not described in 'mtk_disp_aal'

Cc: Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@kernel.org>
Cc: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>
Cc: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Link: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/dri-devel/patch/20230609081732.3842341-5-lee@kernel.org/
Signed-off-by: Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@kernel.org>

show more ...

drm/mediatek: Convert to platform remove callback returning void

The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error

drm/mediatek: Convert to platform remove callback returning void

The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.

Trivially convert the mediatek drm drivers from always returning zero in
the remove callback to the void returning variant.

Reviewed-by: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Jyri Sarha <jyri.sarha@iki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Link: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/dri-devel/patch/20230801110239.831099-8-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de/
Signed-off-by: Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@kernel.org>

show more ...

drm: Explicitly include correct DT includes

The DT of_device.h and of_platform.h date back to the separate
of_platform_bus_type before it as merged into the regular platform bus.
As part of that mer

drm: Explicitly include correct DT includes

The DT of_device.h and of_platform.h date back to the separate
of_platform_bus_type before it as merged into the regular platform bus.
As part of that merge prepping Arm DT support 13 years ago, they
"temporarily" include each other. They also include platform_device.h
and of.h. As a result, there's a pretty much random mix of those include
files used throughout the tree. In order to detangle these headers and
replace the implicit includes with struct declarations, users need to
explicitly include the correct includes.

Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Reviewed-by: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
Acked-by: Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham+renesas@ideasonboard.com>
Acked-by: Robert Foss <rfoss@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230714174545.4056287-1-robh@kernel.org

show more ...

drm/mediatek: Include missing headers

Fix the follow sparse warnings by adding missing headers:

drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_cec.c:251:24: sparse: warning: symbol 'mtk_cec_driver' was not declared.

drm/mediatek: Include missing headers

Fix the follow sparse warnings by adding missing headers:

drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_cec.c:251:24: sparse: warning: symbol 'mtk_cec_driver' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_ccorr.c:221:24: sparse: warning: symbol 'mtk_disp_ccorr_driver' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_rdma.c:390:24: sparse: warning: symbol 'mtk_disp_rdma_driver' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_gamma.c:209:24: sparse: warning: symbol 'mtk_disp_gamma_driver' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_ovl.c:565:24: sparse: warning: symbol 'mtk_disp_ovl_driver' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_color.c:164:24: sparse: warning: symbol 'mtk_disp_color_driver' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_aal.c:161:24: sparse: warning: symbol 'mtk_disp_aal_driver' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dpi.c:1109:24: sparse: warning: symbol 'mtk_dpi_driver' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_hdmi_ddc.c:340:24: sparse: warning: symbol 'mtk_hdmi_ddc_driver' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c:1223:24: sparse: warning: symbol 'mtk_dsi_driver' was not declared. Should it be static?

Signed-off-by: Miles Chen <miles.chen@mediatek.com>
Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Link: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/patch/20230110091647.13265-1-miles.chen@mediatek.com/
Signed-off-by: Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@kernel.org>

show more ...

drm/mediatek: Add lut diff flag for new gamma hardware support

mt8183 gamma module usage is different with before soc,
gamma odd(index start from 0) lut value set to hardware
register should be
the

drm/mediatek: Add lut diff flag for new gamma hardware support

mt8183 gamma module usage is different with before soc,
gamma odd(index start from 0) lut value set to hardware
register should be
the difference of current lut value with last lut value.

for example, chrome os user space set lut
like this(only r chanel for example):
2 4 6 8 10 12.
1) mt8183 gamma driver should set the gamma lut to hardware
register like this:
2 [2] 6 [2] 10 [2]
the value with [] is the difference value
2)gamma hardware process display data with original lut

Link: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/patch/20220428085829.15855-2-yongqiang.niu@mediatek.com/
Signed-off-by: Yongqiang Niu <yongqiang.niu@mediatek.com>
Signed-off-by: Yongqiang Niu <yongqiang.niu@mediatek.corp-partner.google.com>
Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@kernel.org>

show more ...

drm/mediatek: Add mt8183 aal support

Add mt8183 aal private data.

Signed-off-by: Yongqiang Niu <yongqiang.niu@mediatek.com>
Tested-by: Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Chun-Kuang H

drm/mediatek: Add mt8183 aal support

Add mt8183 aal private data.

Signed-off-by: Yongqiang Niu <yongqiang.niu@mediatek.com>
Tested-by: Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@kernel.org>

show more ...

drm/mediatek: Separate aal sub driver

MT8173 aal has gamma function but mt8183 aal has no gamma
function, so separate aal sub driver to have a private
data for different SoC.

Signed-off-by: Yongqia

drm/mediatek: Separate aal sub driver

MT8173 aal has gamma function but mt8183 aal has no gamma
function, so separate aal sub driver to have a private
data for different SoC.

Signed-off-by: Yongqiang Niu <yongqiang.niu@mediatek.com>
Tested-by: Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@kernel.org>

show more ...