|
Revision tags: v6.6.25, v6.6.24, v6.6.23, v6.6.16, v6.6.15, v6.6.14, v6.6.13, v6.6.12, v6.6.11, v6.6.10, v6.6.9, v6.6.8, v6.6.7, v6.6.6, v6.6.5, v6.6.4, v6.6.3, v6.6.2, v6.5.11, v6.6.1, v6.5.10, v6.6, v6.5.9, v6.5.8, v6.5.7, v6.5.6, v6.5.5, v6.5.4, v6.5.3, v6.5.2, v6.1.51, v6.5.1, v6.1.50, v6.5, v6.1.49, v6.1.48, v6.1.46, v6.1.45, v6.1.44, v6.1.43, v6.1.42, v6.1.41, v6.1.40, v6.1.39, v6.1.38, v6.1.37, v6.1.36, v6.4, v6.1.35, v6.1.34, v6.1.33, v6.1.32, v6.1.31, v6.1.30, v6.1.29, v6.1.28, v6.1.27, v6.1.26, v6.3, v6.1.25, v6.1.24, v6.1.23, v6.1.22, v6.1.21, v6.1.20, v6.1.19, v6.1.18, v6.1.17, v6.1.16, v6.1.15, v6.1.14, v6.1.13, v6.2, v6.1.12, v6.1.11, v6.1.10, v6.1.9, v6.1.8, v6.1.7, v6.1.6, v6.1.5, v6.0.19, v6.0.18, v6.1.4, v6.1.3, v6.0.17, v6.1.2, v6.0.16, v6.1.1, v6.0.15, v6.0.14, v6.0.13, v6.1, v6.0.12, v6.0.11, v6.0.10, v5.15.80, v6.0.9, v5.15.79, v6.0.8, v5.15.78, v6.0.7, v5.15.77, v5.15.76, v6.0.6, v6.0.5, v5.15.75, v6.0.4, v6.0.3, v6.0.2, v5.15.74, v5.15.73, v6.0.1, v5.15.72, v6.0, v5.15.71, v5.15.70, v5.15.69, v5.15.68 |
|
| #
0c89abb2 |
| 12-Sep-2022 |
Gaosheng Cui <cuigaosheng1@huawei.com> |
drm/i915: remove unused i915_gem_lmem_obj_ops declaration
i915_gem_lmem_obj_ops has been removed since
commit 213d50927763 ("drm/i915/ttm: Introduce a TTM i915
gem object backend"), so remove it.
S
drm/i915: remove unused i915_gem_lmem_obj_ops declaration
i915_gem_lmem_obj_ops has been removed since
commit 213d50927763 ("drm/i915/ttm: Introduce a TTM i915
gem object backend"), so remove it.
Signed-off-by: Gaosheng Cui <cuigaosheng1@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220913024847.552254-7-cuigaosheng1@huawei.com
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: v5.15.67, v5.15.66, v5.15.65, v5.15.64, v5.15.63, v5.15.62, v5.15.61, v5.15.60, v5.15.59, v5.19, v5.15.58, v5.15.57, v5.15.56, v5.15.55, v5.15.54, v5.15.53, v5.15.52, v5.15.51, v5.15.50, v5.15.49, v5.15.48, v5.15.47, v5.15.46, v5.15.45, v5.15.44, v5.15.43, v5.15.42, v5.18, v5.15.41, v5.15.40, v5.15.39, v5.15.38, v5.15.37, v5.15.36, v5.15.35, v5.15.34, v5.15.33, v5.15.32, v5.15.31, v5.17, v5.15.30, v5.15.29, v5.15.28, v5.15.27, v5.15.26, v5.15.25, v5.15.24, v5.15.23, v5.15.22, v5.15.21, v5.15.20, v5.15.19, v5.15.18, v5.15.17, v5.4.173, v5.15.16, v5.15.15, v5.16, v5.15.10, v5.15.9, v5.15.8, v5.15.7, v5.15.6, v5.15.5, v5.15.4, v5.15.3, v5.15.2, v5.15.1, v5.15, v5.14.14, v5.14.13, v5.14.12, v5.14.11, v5.14.10, v5.14.9, v5.14.8, v5.14.7, v5.14.6, v5.10.67 |
|
| #
7acbbc7c |
| 16-Sep-2021 |
Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com> |
drm/i915/guc: put all guc objects in lmem when available
The firmware binary has to be loaded from lmem and the recommendation is
to put all other objects in there as well. Note that we don't fall b
drm/i915/guc: put all guc objects in lmem when available
The firmware binary has to be loaded from lmem and the recommendation is
to put all other objects in there as well. Note that we don't fall back
to system memory if the allocation in lmem fails because all objects are
allocated during driver load and if we have issues with lmem at that point
something is seriously wrong with the system, so no point in trying to
handle it.
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Abdiel Janulgue <abdiel.janulgue@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Vinay Belgaumkar <vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>
Cc: Radoslaw Szwichtenberg <radoslaw.szwichtenberg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210916162819.27848-3-matthew.brost@intel.com
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: v5.10.66, v5.14.5, v5.14.4, v5.10.65, v5.14.3, v5.10.64, v5.14.2, v5.10.63, v5.14.1, v5.10.62, v5.14, v5.10.61, v5.10.60, v5.10.53, v5.10.52, v5.10.51, v5.10.50, v5.10.49, v5.13 |
|
| #
d22632c8 |
| 25-Jun-2021 |
Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> |
drm/i915: support forcing the page size with lmem
For some specialised objects we might need something larger than the
regions min_page_size due to some hw restriction, and slightly more
hairy is ne
drm/i915: support forcing the page size with lmem
For some specialised objects we might need something larger than the
regions min_page_size due to some hw restriction, and slightly more
hairy is needing something smaller with the guarantee that such objects
will never be inserted into any GTT, which is the case for the paging
structures.
This also fixes how we setup the BO page_alignment, if we later migrate
the object somewhere else. For example if the placements are {SMEM,
LMEM}, then we might get this wrong. Pushing the min_page_size behaviour
into the manager should fix this.
v2(Thomas): push the default page size behaviour into buddy_man, and let
the user override it with the page-alignment, which looks cleaner
v3: rebase on ttm sys changes
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210625103824.558481-1-matthew.auld@intel.com
show more ...
|
| #
0ff37575 |
| 24-Jun-2021 |
Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com> |
drm/i915: Update object placement flags to be mutable
The object ops i915_GEM_OBJECT_HAS_IOMEM and the object
I915_BO_ALLOC_STRUCT_PAGE flags are considered immutable by
much of our code. Introduce
drm/i915: Update object placement flags to be mutable
The object ops i915_GEM_OBJECT_HAS_IOMEM and the object
I915_BO_ALLOC_STRUCT_PAGE flags are considered immutable by
much of our code. Introduce a new mem_flags member to hold these
and make sure checks for these flags being set are either done
under the object lock or with pages properly pinned. The flags
will change during migration under the object lock.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210624084240.270219-2-thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: v5.10.46, v5.10.43 |
|
| #
213d5092 |
| 10-Jun-2021 |
Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com> |
drm/i915/ttm: Introduce a TTM i915 gem object backend
Most logical place to introduce TTM buffer objects is as an i915
gem object backend. We need to add some ops to account for added
functionality
drm/i915/ttm: Introduce a TTM i915 gem object backend
Most logical place to introduce TTM buffer objects is as an i915
gem object backend. We need to add some ops to account for added
functionality like delayed delete and LRU list manipulation.
Initially we support only LMEM and SYSTEM memory, but SYSTEM
(which in this case means evicted LMEM objects) is not
visible to i915 GEM yet. The plan is to move the i915 gem system region
over to the TTM system memory type in upcoming patches.
We set up GPU bindings directly both from LMEM and from the system region,
as there is no need to use the legacy TTM_TT memory type. We reserve
that for future porting of GGTT bindings to TTM.
Remove the old lmem backend.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210610070152.572423-2-thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: v5.10.42, v5.10.41, v5.10.40, v5.10.39, v5.4.119, v5.10.36, v5.10.35, v5.10.34, v5.4.116, v5.10.33 |
|
| #
4bc91dbd |
| 27-Apr-2021 |
Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com> |
drm/i915/lmem: Bypass aperture when lmem is available
In the scenario where local memory is available, we have
rely on CPU access via lmem directly instead of aperture.
v2:
gmch is only relevant fo
drm/i915/lmem: Bypass aperture when lmem is available
In the scenario where local memory is available, we have
rely on CPU access via lmem directly instead of aperture.
v2:
gmch is only relevant for much older hw, therefore we can drop the
has_aperture check since it should always be present on such platforms.
(Chris)
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Chris P Wilson <chris.p.wilson@intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: CQ Tang <cq.tang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210427085417.120246-6-matthew.auld@intel.com
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: v5.12, v5.10.32, v5.10.31, v5.10.30, v5.10.27, v5.10.26, v5.10.25, v5.10.24, v5.10.23, v5.10.22, v5.10.21, v5.10.20, v5.10.19, v5.4.101, v5.10.18, v5.10.17, v5.11, v5.10.16, v5.10.15, v5.10.14 |
|
| #
97d55396 |
| 14-Jan-2021 |
Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> |
drm/i915/region: convert object_create into object_init
Give more flexibility to the caller, if they already have an allocated
object, in case they wish to apply some transformation to the object
pr
drm/i915/region: convert object_create into object_init
Give more flexibility to the caller, if they already have an allocated
object, in case they wish to apply some transformation to the object
prior to handing it over to the region specific initialisation step,
like in gem_create_ext where we would like to first apply the extensions
to the object.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210114182402.840247-3-matthew.auld@intel.com
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: v5.10, v5.8.17, v5.8.16, v5.8.15, v5.9, v5.8.14, v5.8.13, v5.8.12, v5.8.11, v5.8.10, v5.8.9, v5.8.8, v5.8.7, v5.8.6, v5.4.62, v5.8.5, v5.8.4, v5.4.61, v5.8.3, v5.4.60, v5.8.2, v5.4.59, v5.8.1, v5.4.58, v5.4.57, v5.4.56, v5.8, v5.7.12, v5.4.55, v5.7.11, v5.4.54, v5.7.10, v5.4.53, v5.4.52, v5.7.9, v5.7.8, v5.4.51, v5.4.50, v5.7.7, v5.4.49, v5.7.6, v5.7.5, v5.4.48, v5.7.4, v5.7.3, v5.4.47, v5.4.46, v5.7.2, v5.4.45, v5.7.1, v5.4.44, v5.7, v5.4.43, v5.4.42, v5.4.41, v5.4.40, v5.4.39, v5.4.38, v5.4.37, v5.4.36, v5.4.35, v5.4.34, v5.4.33, v5.4.32, v5.4.31, v5.4.30, v5.4.29, v5.6, v5.4.28, v5.4.27, v5.4.26, v5.4.25, v5.4.24, v5.4.23, v5.4.22, v5.4.21, v5.4.20, v5.4.19, v5.4.18, v5.4.17, v5.4.16, v5.5, v5.4.15, v5.4.14, v5.4.13, v5.4.12, v5.4.11, v5.4.10, v5.4.9, v5.4.8 |
|
| #
6056e500 |
| 02-Jan-2020 |
Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> |
drm/i915/gem: Support discontiguous lmem object maps
Create a vmap for discontinguous lmem objects to support
i915_gem_object_pin_map().
v2: Offset io address by region.start for fake-lmem
Signed-
drm/i915/gem: Support discontiguous lmem object maps
Create a vmap for discontinguous lmem objects to support
i915_gem_object_pin_map().
v2: Offset io address by region.start for fake-lmem
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200102204215.1519103-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: v5.4.7, v5.4.6, v5.4.5, v5.4.4, v5.4.3, v5.3.15, v5.4.2, v5.4.1, v5.3.14, v5.4, v5.3.13, v5.3.12, v5.3.11, v5.3.10, v5.3.9, v5.3.8 |
|
| #
01377a0d |
| 25-Oct-2019 |
Abdiel Janulgue <abdiel.janulgue@linux.intel.com> |
drm/i915/lmem: support kernel mapping
We can create LMEM objects, but we also need to support mapping them
into kernel space for internal use.
Signed-off-by: Abdiel Janulgue <abdiel.janulgue@linux.
drm/i915/lmem: support kernel mapping
We can create LMEM objects, but we also need to support mapping them
into kernel space for internal use.
Signed-off-by: Abdiel Janulgue <abdiel.janulgue@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Steve Hampson <steven.t.hampson@intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191025153728.23689-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
show more ...
|
| #
b908be54 |
| 25-Oct-2019 |
Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> |
drm/i915: support creating LMEM objects
We currently define LMEM, or local memory, as just another memory
region, like system memory or stolen, which we can expose to userspace
and can be mapped to
drm/i915: support creating LMEM objects
We currently define LMEM, or local memory, as just another memory
region, like system memory or stolen, which we can expose to userspace
and can be mapped to the CPU via some BAR.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Abdiel Janulgue <abdiel.janulgue@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191025153728.23689-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: v5.10, v5.8.17, v5.8.16, v5.8.15, v5.9, v5.8.14, v5.8.13, v5.8.12, v5.8.11, v5.8.10, v5.8.9, v5.8.8, v5.8.7, v5.8.6, v5.4.62, v5.8.5, v5.8.4, v5.4.61, v5.8.3, v5.4.60, v5.8.2, v5.4.59, v5.8.1, v5.4.58, v5.4.57, v5.4.56, v5.8, v5.7.12, v5.4.55, v5.7.11, v5.4.54, v5.7.10, v5.4.53, v5.4.52, v5.7.9, v5.7.8, v5.4.51, v5.4.50, v5.7.7, v5.4.49, v5.7.6, v5.7.5, v5.4.48, v5.7.4, v5.7.3, v5.4.47, v5.4.46, v5.7.2, v5.4.45, v5.7.1, v5.4.44, v5.7, v5.4.43, v5.4.42, v5.4.41, v5.4.40, v5.4.39, v5.4.38, v5.4.37, v5.4.36, v5.4.35, v5.4.34, v5.4.33, v5.4.32, v5.4.31, v5.4.30, v5.4.29, v5.6, v5.4.28, v5.4.27, v5.4.26, v5.4.25, v5.4.24, v5.4.23, v5.4.22, v5.4.21, v5.4.20, v5.4.19, v5.4.18, v5.4.17, v5.4.16, v5.5, v5.4.15, v5.4.14, v5.4.13, v5.4.12, v5.4.11, v5.4.10, v5.4.9, v5.4.8 |
|
| #
6056e500 |
| 02-Jan-2020 |
Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> |
drm/i915/gem: Support discontiguous lmem object maps
Create a vmap for discontinguous lmem objects to support
i915_gem_object_pin_map().
v2: Offset io address by region.start fo
drm/i915/gem: Support discontiguous lmem object maps
Create a vmap for discontinguous lmem objects to support
i915_gem_object_pin_map().
v2: Offset io address by region.start for fake-lmem
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200102204215.1519103-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: v5.4.7, v5.4.6, v5.4.5, v5.4.4, v5.4.3, v5.3.15, v5.4.2, v5.4.1, v5.3.14, v5.4, v5.3.13, v5.3.12, v5.3.11, v5.3.10, v5.3.9, v5.3.8 |
|
| #
01377a0d |
| 25-Oct-2019 |
Abdiel Janulgue <abdiel.janulgue@linux.intel.com> |
drm/i915/lmem: support kernel mapping
We can create LMEM objects, but we also need to support mapping them
into kernel space for internal use.
Signed-off-by: Abdiel Janulgue <ab
drm/i915/lmem: support kernel mapping
We can create LMEM objects, but we also need to support mapping them
into kernel space for internal use.
Signed-off-by: Abdiel Janulgue <abdiel.janulgue@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Steve Hampson <steven.t.hampson@intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191025153728.23689-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
show more ...
|
| #
b908be54 |
| 25-Oct-2019 |
Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> |
drm/i915: support creating LMEM objects
We currently define LMEM, or local memory, as just another memory
region, like system memory or stolen, which we can expose to userspace
and c
drm/i915: support creating LMEM objects
We currently define LMEM, or local memory, as just another memory
region, like system memory or stolen, which we can expose to userspace
and can be mapped to the CPU via some BAR.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Abdiel Janulgue <abdiel.janulgue@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191025153728.23689-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
show more ...
|