|
Revision tags: v6.6.25, v6.6.24, v6.6.23, v6.6.16, v6.6.15, v6.6.14, v6.6.13, v6.6.12, v6.6.11, v6.6.10, v6.6.9, v6.6.8, v6.6.7, v6.6.6, v6.6.5, v6.6.4, v6.6.3, v6.6.2, v6.5.11, v6.6.1, v6.5.10, v6.6, v6.5.9, v6.5.8, v6.5.7, v6.5.6, v6.5.5, v6.5.4, v6.5.3, v6.5.2, v6.1.51, v6.5.1, v6.1.50, v6.5, v6.1.49, v6.1.48, v6.1.46, v6.1.45, v6.1.44, v6.1.43, v6.1.42, v6.1.41, v6.1.40, v6.1.39, v6.1.38, v6.1.37, v6.1.36, v6.4, v6.1.35, v6.1.34 |
|
| #
c21d322e |
| 12-Jun-2023 |
Eddie James <eajames@linux.ibm.com> |
fsi: Use of_match_table for bus matching if specified
Since we have two scom drivers, use the standard of matching if
the driver specifies a table so that the right devices go to the
right driver.
fsi: Use of_match_table for bus matching if specified
Since we have two scom drivers, use the standard of matching if
the driver specifies a table so that the right devices go to the
right driver.
Signed-off-by: Eddie James <eajames@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230612195657.245125-4-eajames@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: v6.1.33, v6.1.32, v6.1.31, v6.1.30, v6.1.29, v6.1.28, v6.1.27, v6.1.26, v6.3, v6.1.25, v6.1.24, v6.1.23, v6.1.22, v6.1.21, v6.1.20, v6.1.19, v6.1.18, v6.1.17, v6.1.16, v6.1.15, v6.1.14, v6.1.13, v6.2, v6.1.12, v6.1.11, v6.1.10, v6.1.9, v6.1.8, v6.1.7, v6.1.6, v6.1.5, v6.0.19, v6.0.18, v6.1.4, v6.1.3, v6.0.17, v6.1.2, v6.0.16, v6.1.1, v6.0.15, v6.0.14, v6.0.13, v6.1, v6.0.12, v6.0.11, v6.0.10, v5.15.80, v6.0.9, v5.15.79, v6.0.8, v5.15.78, v6.0.7, v5.15.77, v5.15.76, v6.0.6, v6.0.5, v5.15.75, v6.0.4, v6.0.3, v6.0.2, v5.15.74, v5.15.73, v6.0.1, v5.15.72, v6.0, v5.15.71, v5.15.70, v5.15.69, v5.15.68, v5.15.67, v5.15.66, v5.15.65, v5.15.64, v5.15.63, v5.15.62, v5.15.61, v5.15.60, v5.15.59, v5.19, v5.15.58, v5.15.57, v5.15.56, v5.15.55, v5.15.54, v5.15.53, v5.15.52, v5.15.51, v5.15.50, v5.15.49, v5.15.48, v5.15.47, v5.15.46, v5.15.45, v5.15.44, v5.15.43, v5.15.42, v5.18, v5.15.41, v5.15.40, v5.15.39, v5.15.38, v5.15.37, v5.15.36, v5.15.35, v5.15.34, v5.15.33, v5.15.32, v5.15.31, v5.17, v5.15.30, v5.15.29, v5.15.28, v5.15.27, v5.15.26, v5.15.25, v5.15.24, v5.15.23, v5.15.22, v5.15.21, v5.15.20, v5.15.19, v5.15.18, v5.15.17, v5.4.173, v5.15.16, v5.15.15, v5.16, v5.15.10, v5.15.9, v5.15.8, v5.15.7 |
|
| #
ab1b7915 |
| 06-Dec-2021 |
Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au> |
fsi: scom: Remove retries in indirect scoms
In commit f72ddbe1d7b7 ("fsi: scom: Remove retries") the retries were
removed from get and put scoms. That patch missed the retires in get and
put indirec
fsi: scom: Remove retries in indirect scoms
In commit f72ddbe1d7b7 ("fsi: scom: Remove retries") the retries were
removed from get and put scoms. That patch missed the retires in get and
put indirect scom.
For the same reason, remove them from the scom driver to allow the
caller to decide to retry.
This removes the following special case which would have caused the
retry code to return early:
- if ((ind_data & XSCOM_DATA_IND_COMPLETE) || (err != SCOM_PIB_BLOCKED))
- return 0;
I believe this case is handled.
Fixes: f72ddbe1d7b7 ("fsi: scom: Remove retries")
Signed-off-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
Reviewed-by: Eddie James <eajames@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211207033811.518981-3-joel@jms.id.au
Signed-off-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
show more ...
|
| #
d46fddd5 |
| 06-Dec-2021 |
Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au> |
fsi: scom: Fix error handling
SCOM error handling is made complex by trying to pass around two bits of
information: the function return code, and a status parameter that
represents the CFAM error st
fsi: scom: Fix error handling
SCOM error handling is made complex by trying to pass around two bits of
information: the function return code, and a status parameter that
represents the CFAM error status register.
The commit f72ddbe1d7b7 ("fsi: scom: Remove retries") removed the
"hidden" retries in the SCOM driver, in preference of allowing the
calling code (userspace or driver) to decide how to handle a failed
SCOM. However it introduced a bug by attempting to be smart about the
return codes that were "errors" and which were ok to fall through to the
status register parsing.
We get the following errors:
- EINVAL or ENXIO, for indirect scoms where the value is invalid
- EINVAL, where the size or address is incorrect
- EIO or ETIMEOUT, where FSI write failed (aspeed master)
- EAGAIN, where the master detected a crc error (GPIO master only)
- EBUSY, where the bus is disabled (GPIO master in external mode)
In all of these cases we should fail the SCOM read/write and return the
error.
Thanks to Dan Carpenter for the detailed bug report.
Fixes: f72ddbe1d7b7 ("fsi: scom: Remove retries")
Link: https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linux-fsi/2021-November/000235.html
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
Reviewed-by: Eddie James <eajames@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211207033811.518981-2-joel@jms.id.au
Signed-off-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
show more ...
|
| #
abcc43b1 |
| 06-Dec-2021 |
Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au> |
fsi: scom: Remove retries in indirect scoms
In commit f72ddbe1d7b7 ("fsi: scom: Remove retries") the retries were
removed from get and put scoms. That patch missed the retires in get and
put indirec
fsi: scom: Remove retries in indirect scoms
In commit f72ddbe1d7b7 ("fsi: scom: Remove retries") the retries were
removed from get and put scoms. That patch missed the retires in get and
put indirect scom.
For the same reason, remove them from the scom driver to allow the
caller to decide to retry.
This removes the following special case which would have caused the
retry code to return early:
- if ((ind_data & XSCOM_DATA_IND_COMPLETE) || (err != SCOM_PIB_BLOCKED))
- return 0;
I believe this case is handled.
OpenBMC-Staging-Count: 1
Fixes: f72ddbe1d7b7 ("fsi: scom: Remove retries")
Signed-off-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
Reviewed-by: Eddie James <eajames@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211207033811.518981-3-joel@jms.id.au
Signed-off-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
show more ...
|
| #
b28b0178 |
| 06-Dec-2021 |
Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au> |
fsi: scom: Fix error handling
SCOM error handling is made complex by trying to pass around two bits of
information: the function return code, and a status parameter that
represents the CFAM error st
fsi: scom: Fix error handling
SCOM error handling is made complex by trying to pass around two bits of
information: the function return code, and a status parameter that
represents the CFAM error status register.
The commit f72ddbe1d7b7 ("fsi: scom: Remove retries") removed the
"hidden" retries in the SCOM driver, in preference of allowing the
calling code (userspace or driver) to decide how to handle a failed
SCOM. However it introduced a bug by attempting to be smart about the
return codes that were "errors" and which were ok to fall through to the
status register parsing.
We get the following errors:
- EINVAL or ENXIO, for indirect scoms where the value is invalid
- EINVAL, where the size or address is incorrect
- EIO or ETIMEOUT, where FSI write failed (aspeed master)
- EAGAIN, where the master detected a crc error (GPIO master only)
- EBUSY, where the bus is disabled (GPIO master in external mode)
In all of these cases we should fail the SCOM read/write and return the
error.
Thanks to Dan Carpenter for the detailed bug report.
OpenBMC-Staging-Count: 1
Fixes: f72ddbe1d7b7 ("fsi: scom: Remove retries")
Link: https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linux-fsi/2021-November/000235.html
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
Reviewed-by: Eddie James <eajames@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211207033811.518981-2-joel@jms.id.au
Signed-off-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
show more ...
|
| #
abcc43b1 |
| 06-Dec-2021 |
Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au> |
fsi: scom: Remove retries in indirect scoms
In commit f72ddbe1d7b7 ("fsi: scom: Remove retries") the retries were
removed from get and put scoms. That patch missed the retires in get and
put indirec
fsi: scom: Remove retries in indirect scoms
In commit f72ddbe1d7b7 ("fsi: scom: Remove retries") the retries were
removed from get and put scoms. That patch missed the retires in get and
put indirect scom.
For the same reason, remove them from the scom driver to allow the
caller to decide to retry.
This removes the following special case which would have caused the
retry code to return early:
- if ((ind_data & XSCOM_DATA_IND_COMPLETE) || (err != SCOM_PIB_BLOCKED))
- return 0;
I believe this case is handled.
OpenBMC-Staging-Count: 1
Fixes: f72ddbe1d7b7 ("fsi: scom: Remove retries")
Signed-off-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
Reviewed-by: Eddie James <eajames@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211207033811.518981-3-joel@jms.id.au
Signed-off-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
show more ...
|
| #
b28b0178 |
| 06-Dec-2021 |
Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au> |
fsi: scom: Fix error handling
SCOM error handling is made complex by trying to pass around two bits of
information: the function return code, and a status parameter that
represents the CFAM error st
fsi: scom: Fix error handling
SCOM error handling is made complex by trying to pass around two bits of
information: the function return code, and a status parameter that
represents the CFAM error status register.
The commit f72ddbe1d7b7 ("fsi: scom: Remove retries") removed the
"hidden" retries in the SCOM driver, in preference of allowing the
calling code (userspace or driver) to decide how to handle a failed
SCOM. However it introduced a bug by attempting to be smart about the
return codes that were "errors" and which were ok to fall through to the
status register parsing.
We get the following errors:
- EINVAL or ENXIO, for indirect scoms where the value is invalid
- EINVAL, where the size or address is incorrect
- EIO or ETIMEOUT, where FSI write failed (aspeed master)
- EAGAIN, where the master detected a crc error (GPIO master only)
- EBUSY, where the bus is disabled (GPIO master in external mode)
In all of these cases we should fail the SCOM read/write and return the
error.
Thanks to Dan Carpenter for the detailed bug report.
OpenBMC-Staging-Count: 1
Fixes: f72ddbe1d7b7 ("fsi: scom: Remove retries")
Link: https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linux-fsi/2021-November/000235.html
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
Reviewed-by: Eddie James <eajames@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211207033811.518981-2-joel@jms.id.au
Signed-off-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
show more ...
|
| #
abcc43b1 |
| 06-Dec-2021 |
Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au> |
fsi: scom: Remove retries in indirect scoms
In commit f72ddbe1d7b7 ("fsi: scom: Remove retries") the retries were
removed from get and put scoms. That patch missed the retires in get and
put indirec
fsi: scom: Remove retries in indirect scoms
In commit f72ddbe1d7b7 ("fsi: scom: Remove retries") the retries were
removed from get and put scoms. That patch missed the retires in get and
put indirect scom.
For the same reason, remove them from the scom driver to allow the
caller to decide to retry.
This removes the following special case which would have caused the
retry code to return early:
- if ((ind_data & XSCOM_DATA_IND_COMPLETE) || (err != SCOM_PIB_BLOCKED))
- return 0;
I believe this case is handled.
OpenBMC-Staging-Count: 1
Fixes: f72ddbe1d7b7 ("fsi: scom: Remove retries")
Signed-off-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
Reviewed-by: Eddie James <eajames@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211207033811.518981-3-joel@jms.id.au
Signed-off-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
show more ...
|
| #
b28b0178 |
| 06-Dec-2021 |
Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au> |
fsi: scom: Fix error handling
SCOM error handling is made complex by trying to pass around two bits of
information: the function return code, and a status parameter that
represents the CFAM error st
fsi: scom: Fix error handling
SCOM error handling is made complex by trying to pass around two bits of
information: the function return code, and a status parameter that
represents the CFAM error status register.
The commit f72ddbe1d7b7 ("fsi: scom: Remove retries") removed the
"hidden" retries in the SCOM driver, in preference of allowing the
calling code (userspace or driver) to decide how to handle a failed
SCOM. However it introduced a bug by attempting to be smart about the
return codes that were "errors" and which were ok to fall through to the
status register parsing.
We get the following errors:
- EINVAL or ENXIO, for indirect scoms where the value is invalid
- EINVAL, where the size or address is incorrect
- EIO or ETIMEOUT, where FSI write failed (aspeed master)
- EAGAIN, where the master detected a crc error (GPIO master only)
- EBUSY, where the bus is disabled (GPIO master in external mode)
In all of these cases we should fail the SCOM read/write and return the
error.
Thanks to Dan Carpenter for the detailed bug report.
OpenBMC-Staging-Count: 1
Fixes: f72ddbe1d7b7 ("fsi: scom: Remove retries")
Link: https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linux-fsi/2021-November/000235.html
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
Reviewed-by: Eddie James <eajames@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211207033811.518981-2-joel@jms.id.au
Signed-off-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
show more ...
|
| #
abcc43b1 |
| 06-Dec-2021 |
Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au> |
fsi: scom: Remove retries in indirect scoms
In commit f72ddbe1d7b7 ("fsi: scom: Remove retries") the retries were
removed from get and put scoms. That patch missed the retires in get and
put indirec
fsi: scom: Remove retries in indirect scoms
In commit f72ddbe1d7b7 ("fsi: scom: Remove retries") the retries were
removed from get and put scoms. That patch missed the retires in get and
put indirect scom.
For the same reason, remove them from the scom driver to allow the
caller to decide to retry.
This removes the following special case which would have caused the
retry code to return early:
- if ((ind_data & XSCOM_DATA_IND_COMPLETE) || (err != SCOM_PIB_BLOCKED))
- return 0;
I believe this case is handled.
OpenBMC-Staging-Count: 1
Fixes: f72ddbe1d7b7 ("fsi: scom: Remove retries")
Signed-off-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
Reviewed-by: Eddie James <eajames@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211207033811.518981-3-joel@jms.id.au
Signed-off-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
show more ...
|
| #
b28b0178 |
| 06-Dec-2021 |
Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au> |
fsi: scom: Fix error handling
SCOM error handling is made complex by trying to pass around two bits of
information: the function return code, and a status parameter that
represents the CFAM error st
fsi: scom: Fix error handling
SCOM error handling is made complex by trying to pass around two bits of
information: the function return code, and a status parameter that
represents the CFAM error status register.
The commit f72ddbe1d7b7 ("fsi: scom: Remove retries") removed the
"hidden" retries in the SCOM driver, in preference of allowing the
calling code (userspace or driver) to decide how to handle a failed
SCOM. However it introduced a bug by attempting to be smart about the
return codes that were "errors" and which were ok to fall through to the
status register parsing.
We get the following errors:
- EINVAL or ENXIO, for indirect scoms where the value is invalid
- EINVAL, where the size or address is incorrect
- EIO or ETIMEOUT, where FSI write failed (aspeed master)
- EAGAIN, where the master detected a crc error (GPIO master only)
- EBUSY, where the bus is disabled (GPIO master in external mode)
In all of these cases we should fail the SCOM read/write and return the
error.
Thanks to Dan Carpenter for the detailed bug report.
OpenBMC-Staging-Count: 1
Fixes: f72ddbe1d7b7 ("fsi: scom: Remove retries")
Link: https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linux-fsi/2021-November/000235.html
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
Reviewed-by: Eddie James <eajames@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211207033811.518981-2-joel@jms.id.au
Signed-off-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
show more ...
|
| #
abcc43b1 |
| 06-Dec-2021 |
Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au> |
fsi: scom: Remove retries in indirect scoms
In commit f72ddbe1d7b7 ("fsi: scom: Remove retries") the retries were
removed from get and put scoms. That patch missed the retires in get and
put indirec
fsi: scom: Remove retries in indirect scoms
In commit f72ddbe1d7b7 ("fsi: scom: Remove retries") the retries were
removed from get and put scoms. That patch missed the retires in get and
put indirect scom.
For the same reason, remove them from the scom driver to allow the
caller to decide to retry.
This removes the following special case which would have caused the
retry code to return early:
- if ((ind_data & XSCOM_DATA_IND_COMPLETE) || (err != SCOM_PIB_BLOCKED))
- return 0;
I believe this case is handled.
OpenBMC-Staging-Count: 1
Fixes: f72ddbe1d7b7 ("fsi: scom: Remove retries")
Signed-off-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
Reviewed-by: Eddie James <eajames@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211207033811.518981-3-joel@jms.id.au
Signed-off-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
show more ...
|
| #
b28b0178 |
| 06-Dec-2021 |
Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au> |
fsi: scom: Fix error handling
SCOM error handling is made complex by trying to pass around two bits of
information: the function return code, and a status parameter that
represents the CFAM error st
fsi: scom: Fix error handling
SCOM error handling is made complex by trying to pass around two bits of
information: the function return code, and a status parameter that
represents the CFAM error status register.
The commit f72ddbe1d7b7 ("fsi: scom: Remove retries") removed the
"hidden" retries in the SCOM driver, in preference of allowing the
calling code (userspace or driver) to decide how to handle a failed
SCOM. However it introduced a bug by attempting to be smart about the
return codes that were "errors" and which were ok to fall through to the
status register parsing.
We get the following errors:
- EINVAL or ENXIO, for indirect scoms where the value is invalid
- EINVAL, where the size or address is incorrect
- EIO or ETIMEOUT, where FSI write failed (aspeed master)
- EAGAIN, where the master detected a crc error (GPIO master only)
- EBUSY, where the bus is disabled (GPIO master in external mode)
In all of these cases we should fail the SCOM read/write and return the
error.
Thanks to Dan Carpenter for the detailed bug report.
OpenBMC-Staging-Count: 1
Fixes: f72ddbe1d7b7 ("fsi: scom: Remove retries")
Link: https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linux-fsi/2021-November/000235.html
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
Reviewed-by: Eddie James <eajames@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211207033811.518981-2-joel@jms.id.au
Signed-off-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
show more ...
|
| #
abcc43b1 |
| 06-Dec-2021 |
Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au> |
fsi: scom: Remove retries in indirect scoms
In commit f72ddbe1d7b7 ("fsi: scom: Remove retries") the retries were
removed from get and put scoms. That patch missed the retires in get and
put indirec
fsi: scom: Remove retries in indirect scoms
In commit f72ddbe1d7b7 ("fsi: scom: Remove retries") the retries were
removed from get and put scoms. That patch missed the retires in get and
put indirect scom.
For the same reason, remove them from the scom driver to allow the
caller to decide to retry.
This removes the following special case which would have caused the
retry code to return early:
- if ((ind_data & XSCOM_DATA_IND_COMPLETE) || (err != SCOM_PIB_BLOCKED))
- return 0;
I believe this case is handled.
OpenBMC-Staging-Count: 1
Fixes: f72ddbe1d7b7 ("fsi: scom: Remove retries")
Signed-off-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
Reviewed-by: Eddie James <eajames@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211207033811.518981-3-joel@jms.id.au
Signed-off-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
show more ...
|
| #
b28b0178 |
| 06-Dec-2021 |
Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au> |
fsi: scom: Fix error handling
SCOM error handling is made complex by trying to pass around two bits of
information: the function return code, and a status parameter that
represents the CFAM error st
fsi: scom: Fix error handling
SCOM error handling is made complex by trying to pass around two bits of
information: the function return code, and a status parameter that
represents the CFAM error status register.
The commit f72ddbe1d7b7 ("fsi: scom: Remove retries") removed the
"hidden" retries in the SCOM driver, in preference of allowing the
calling code (userspace or driver) to decide how to handle a failed
SCOM. However it introduced a bug by attempting to be smart about the
return codes that were "errors" and which were ok to fall through to the
status register parsing.
We get the following errors:
- EINVAL or ENXIO, for indirect scoms where the value is invalid
- EINVAL, where the size or address is incorrect
- EIO or ETIMEOUT, where FSI write failed (aspeed master)
- EAGAIN, where the master detected a crc error (GPIO master only)
- EBUSY, where the bus is disabled (GPIO master in external mode)
In all of these cases we should fail the SCOM read/write and return the
error.
Thanks to Dan Carpenter for the detailed bug report.
OpenBMC-Staging-Count: 1
Fixes: f72ddbe1d7b7 ("fsi: scom: Remove retries")
Link: https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linux-fsi/2021-November/000235.html
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
Reviewed-by: Eddie James <eajames@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211207033811.518981-2-joel@jms.id.au
Signed-off-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
show more ...
|
| #
abcc43b1 |
| 06-Dec-2021 |
Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au> |
fsi: scom: Remove retries in indirect scoms
In commit f72ddbe1d7b7 ("fsi: scom: Remove retries") the retries were
removed from get and put scoms. That patch missed the retires in get and
put indirec
fsi: scom: Remove retries in indirect scoms
In commit f72ddbe1d7b7 ("fsi: scom: Remove retries") the retries were
removed from get and put scoms. That patch missed the retires in get and
put indirect scom.
For the same reason, remove them from the scom driver to allow the
caller to decide to retry.
This removes the following special case which would have caused the
retry code to return early:
- if ((ind_data & XSCOM_DATA_IND_COMPLETE) || (err != SCOM_PIB_BLOCKED))
- return 0;
I believe this case is handled.
OpenBMC-Staging-Count: 1
Fixes: f72ddbe1d7b7 ("fsi: scom: Remove retries")
Signed-off-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
Reviewed-by: Eddie James <eajames@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211207033811.518981-3-joel@jms.id.au
Signed-off-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
show more ...
|
| #
b28b0178 |
| 06-Dec-2021 |
Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au> |
fsi: scom: Fix error handling
SCOM error handling is made complex by trying to pass around two bits of
information: the function return code, and a status parameter that
represents the CFAM error st
fsi: scom: Fix error handling
SCOM error handling is made complex by trying to pass around two bits of
information: the function return code, and a status parameter that
represents the CFAM error status register.
The commit f72ddbe1d7b7 ("fsi: scom: Remove retries") removed the
"hidden" retries in the SCOM driver, in preference of allowing the
calling code (userspace or driver) to decide how to handle a failed
SCOM. However it introduced a bug by attempting to be smart about the
return codes that were "errors" and which were ok to fall through to the
status register parsing.
We get the following errors:
- EINVAL or ENXIO, for indirect scoms where the value is invalid
- EINVAL, where the size or address is incorrect
- EIO or ETIMEOUT, where FSI write failed (aspeed master)
- EAGAIN, where the master detected a crc error (GPIO master only)
- EBUSY, where the bus is disabled (GPIO master in external mode)
In all of these cases we should fail the SCOM read/write and return the
error.
Thanks to Dan Carpenter for the detailed bug report.
OpenBMC-Staging-Count: 1
Fixes: f72ddbe1d7b7 ("fsi: scom: Remove retries")
Link: https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linux-fsi/2021-November/000235.html
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
Reviewed-by: Eddie James <eajames@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211207033811.518981-2-joel@jms.id.au
Signed-off-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
show more ...
|
| #
abcc43b1 |
| 06-Dec-2021 |
Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au> |
fsi: scom: Remove retries in indirect scoms
In commit f72ddbe1d7b7 ("fsi: scom: Remove retries") the retries were
removed from get and put scoms. That patch missed the retires in get and
put indirec
fsi: scom: Remove retries in indirect scoms
In commit f72ddbe1d7b7 ("fsi: scom: Remove retries") the retries were
removed from get and put scoms. That patch missed the retires in get and
put indirect scom.
For the same reason, remove them from the scom driver to allow the
caller to decide to retry.
This removes the following special case which would have caused the
retry code to return early:
- if ((ind_data & XSCOM_DATA_IND_COMPLETE) || (err != SCOM_PIB_BLOCKED))
- return 0;
I believe this case is handled.
OpenBMC-Staging-Count: 1
Fixes: f72ddbe1d7b7 ("fsi: scom: Remove retries")
Signed-off-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
Reviewed-by: Eddie James <eajames@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211207033811.518981-3-joel@jms.id.au
Signed-off-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
show more ...
|
| #
b28b0178 |
| 06-Dec-2021 |
Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au> |
fsi: scom: Fix error handling
SCOM error handling is made complex by trying to pass around two bits of
information: the function return code, and a status parameter that
represents the CFAM error st
fsi: scom: Fix error handling
SCOM error handling is made complex by trying to pass around two bits of
information: the function return code, and a status parameter that
represents the CFAM error status register.
The commit f72ddbe1d7b7 ("fsi: scom: Remove retries") removed the
"hidden" retries in the SCOM driver, in preference of allowing the
calling code (userspace or driver) to decide how to handle a failed
SCOM. However it introduced a bug by attempting to be smart about the
return codes that were "errors" and which were ok to fall through to the
status register parsing.
We get the following errors:
- EINVAL or ENXIO, for indirect scoms where the value is invalid
- EINVAL, where the size or address is incorrect
- EIO or ETIMEOUT, where FSI write failed (aspeed master)
- EAGAIN, where the master detected a crc error (GPIO master only)
- EBUSY, where the bus is disabled (GPIO master in external mode)
In all of these cases we should fail the SCOM read/write and return the
error.
Thanks to Dan Carpenter for the detailed bug report.
OpenBMC-Staging-Count: 1
Fixes: f72ddbe1d7b7 ("fsi: scom: Remove retries")
Link: https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linux-fsi/2021-November/000235.html
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
Reviewed-by: Eddie James <eajames@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211207033811.518981-2-joel@jms.id.au
Signed-off-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
show more ...
|
| #
abcc43b1 |
| 06-Dec-2021 |
Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au> |
fsi: scom: Remove retries in indirect scoms
In commit f72ddbe1d7b7 ("fsi: scom: Remove retries") the retries were
removed from get and put scoms. That patch missed the retires in get and
put indirec
fsi: scom: Remove retries in indirect scoms
In commit f72ddbe1d7b7 ("fsi: scom: Remove retries") the retries were
removed from get and put scoms. That patch missed the retires in get and
put indirect scom.
For the same reason, remove them from the scom driver to allow the
caller to decide to retry.
This removes the following special case which would have caused the
retry code to return early:
- if ((ind_data & XSCOM_DATA_IND_COMPLETE) || (err != SCOM_PIB_BLOCKED))
- return 0;
I believe this case is handled.
OpenBMC-Staging-Count: 1
Fixes: f72ddbe1d7b7 ("fsi: scom: Remove retries")
Signed-off-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
Reviewed-by: Eddie James <eajames@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211207033811.518981-3-joel@jms.id.au
Signed-off-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
show more ...
|
| #
b28b0178 |
| 06-Dec-2021 |
Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au> |
fsi: scom: Fix error handling
SCOM error handling is made complex by trying to pass around two bits of
information: the function return code, and a status parameter that
represents the CFAM error st
fsi: scom: Fix error handling
SCOM error handling is made complex by trying to pass around two bits of
information: the function return code, and a status parameter that
represents the CFAM error status register.
The commit f72ddbe1d7b7 ("fsi: scom: Remove retries") removed the
"hidden" retries in the SCOM driver, in preference of allowing the
calling code (userspace or driver) to decide how to handle a failed
SCOM. However it introduced a bug by attempting to be smart about the
return codes that were "errors" and which were ok to fall through to the
status register parsing.
We get the following errors:
- EINVAL or ENXIO, for indirect scoms where the value is invalid
- EINVAL, where the size or address is incorrect
- EIO or ETIMEOUT, where FSI write failed (aspeed master)
- EAGAIN, where the master detected a crc error (GPIO master only)
- EBUSY, where the bus is disabled (GPIO master in external mode)
In all of these cases we should fail the SCOM read/write and return the
error.
Thanks to Dan Carpenter for the detailed bug report.
OpenBMC-Staging-Count: 1
Fixes: f72ddbe1d7b7 ("fsi: scom: Remove retries")
Link: https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linux-fsi/2021-November/000235.html
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
Reviewed-by: Eddie James <eajames@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211207033811.518981-2-joel@jms.id.au
Signed-off-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
show more ...
|
| #
abcc43b1 |
| 06-Dec-2021 |
Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au> |
fsi: scom: Remove retries in indirect scoms
In commit f72ddbe1d7b7 ("fsi: scom: Remove retries") the retries were
removed from get and put scoms. That patch missed the retires in get and
put indirec
fsi: scom: Remove retries in indirect scoms
In commit f72ddbe1d7b7 ("fsi: scom: Remove retries") the retries were
removed from get and put scoms. That patch missed the retires in get and
put indirect scom.
For the same reason, remove them from the scom driver to allow the
caller to decide to retry.
This removes the following special case which would have caused the
retry code to return early:
- if ((ind_data & XSCOM_DATA_IND_COMPLETE) || (err != SCOM_PIB_BLOCKED))
- return 0;
I believe this case is handled.
OpenBMC-Staging-Count: 1
Fixes: f72ddbe1d7b7 ("fsi: scom: Remove retries")
Signed-off-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
Reviewed-by: Eddie James <eajames@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211207033811.518981-3-joel@jms.id.au
Signed-off-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
show more ...
|
| #
b28b0178 |
| 06-Dec-2021 |
Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au> |
fsi: scom: Fix error handling
SCOM error handling is made complex by trying to pass around two bits of
information: the function return code, and a status parameter that
represents the CFAM error st
fsi: scom: Fix error handling
SCOM error handling is made complex by trying to pass around two bits of
information: the function return code, and a status parameter that
represents the CFAM error status register.
The commit f72ddbe1d7b7 ("fsi: scom: Remove retries") removed the
"hidden" retries in the SCOM driver, in preference of allowing the
calling code (userspace or driver) to decide how to handle a failed
SCOM. However it introduced a bug by attempting to be smart about the
return codes that were "errors" and which were ok to fall through to the
status register parsing.
We get the following errors:
- EINVAL or ENXIO, for indirect scoms where the value is invalid
- EINVAL, where the size or address is incorrect
- EIO or ETIMEOUT, where FSI write failed (aspeed master)
- EAGAIN, where the master detected a crc error (GPIO master only)
- EBUSY, where the bus is disabled (GPIO master in external mode)
In all of these cases we should fail the SCOM read/write and return the
error.
Thanks to Dan Carpenter for the detailed bug report.
OpenBMC-Staging-Count: 1
Fixes: f72ddbe1d7b7 ("fsi: scom: Remove retries")
Link: https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linux-fsi/2021-November/000235.html
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
Reviewed-by: Eddie James <eajames@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211207033811.518981-2-joel@jms.id.au
Signed-off-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
show more ...
|
| #
abcc43b1 |
| 06-Dec-2021 |
Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au> |
fsi: scom: Remove retries in indirect scoms
In commit f72ddbe1d7b7 ("fsi: scom: Remove retries") the retries were
removed from get and put scoms. That patch missed the retires in get and
put indirec
fsi: scom: Remove retries in indirect scoms
In commit f72ddbe1d7b7 ("fsi: scom: Remove retries") the retries were
removed from get and put scoms. That patch missed the retires in get and
put indirect scom.
For the same reason, remove them from the scom driver to allow the
caller to decide to retry.
This removes the following special case which would have caused the
retry code to return early:
- if ((ind_data & XSCOM_DATA_IND_COMPLETE) || (err != SCOM_PIB_BLOCKED))
- return 0;
I believe this case is handled.
OpenBMC-Staging-Count: 1
Fixes: f72ddbe1d7b7 ("fsi: scom: Remove retries")
Signed-off-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
Reviewed-by: Eddie James <eajames@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211207033811.518981-3-joel@jms.id.au
Signed-off-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
show more ...
|
| #
b28b0178 |
| 06-Dec-2021 |
Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au> |
fsi: scom: Fix error handling
SCOM error handling is made complex by trying to pass around two bits of
information: the function return code, and a status parameter that
represents the CFAM error st
fsi: scom: Fix error handling
SCOM error handling is made complex by trying to pass around two bits of
information: the function return code, and a status parameter that
represents the CFAM error status register.
The commit f72ddbe1d7b7 ("fsi: scom: Remove retries") removed the
"hidden" retries in the SCOM driver, in preference of allowing the
calling code (userspace or driver) to decide how to handle a failed
SCOM. However it introduced a bug by attempting to be smart about the
return codes that were "errors" and which were ok to fall through to the
status register parsing.
We get the following errors:
- EINVAL or ENXIO, for indirect scoms where the value is invalid
- EINVAL, where the size or address is incorrect
- EIO or ETIMEOUT, where FSI write failed (aspeed master)
- EAGAIN, where the master detected a crc error (GPIO master only)
- EBUSY, where the bus is disabled (GPIO master in external mode)
In all of these cases we should fail the SCOM read/write and return the
error.
Thanks to Dan Carpenter for the detailed bug report.
OpenBMC-Staging-Count: 1
Fixes: f72ddbe1d7b7 ("fsi: scom: Remove retries")
Link: https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linux-fsi/2021-November/000235.html
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
Reviewed-by: Eddie James <eajames@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211207033811.518981-2-joel@jms.id.au
Signed-off-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
show more ...
|