block, bfq: remove BFQ_WEIGHT_LEGACY_DFL

BFQ_WEIGHT_LEGACY_DFL is the same as CGROUP_WEIGHT_DFL, which means
we don't need cpd_bind_fn() callback to update default weight when
attached to a hierarch

block, bfq: remove BFQ_WEIGHT_LEGACY_DFL

BFQ_WEIGHT_LEGACY_DFL is the same as CGROUP_WEIGHT_DFL, which means
we don't need cpd_bind_fn() callback to update default weight when
attached to a hierarchy.

This patch remove BFQ_WEIGHT_LEGACY_DFL and cpd_bind_fn().

Signed-off-by: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com>
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230406145050.49914-2-zhouchengming@bytedance.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

show more ...

block, bfq: cleanup 'bfqg->online'

After commit dfd6200a0954 ("blk-cgroup: support to track if policy is
online"), there is no need to do this again in bfq.

However, 'pd->online' is not protected b

block, bfq: cleanup 'bfqg->online'

After commit dfd6200a0954 ("blk-cgroup: support to track if policy is
online"), there is no need to do this again in bfq.

However, 'pd->online' is not protected by 'bfqd->lock', in order to make
sure bfq won't see that 'pd->online' is still set after bfq_pd_offline(),
clear it before bfq_pd_offline() is called. This is fine because other
polices doesn't use 'pd->online' and bfq_pd_offline() will move active
bfqq to root cgroup anyway.

Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230202134913.2364549-1-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

show more ...

block, bfq: remove unused bfq_wr_max_time in struct bfq_data

bfqd->bfq_wr_max_time is set to 0 in bfq_init_queue and is never changed.
It is only used in bfq_wr_duration when bfq_wr_max_time > 0 whi

block, bfq: remove unused bfq_wr_max_time in struct bfq_data

bfqd->bfq_wr_max_time is set to 0 in bfq_init_queue and is never changed.
It is only used in bfq_wr_duration when bfq_wr_max_time > 0 which never
meets, so bfqd->bfq_wr_max_time is not used actually. Just remove it.

Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230116095153.3810101-9-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

show more ...

block, bfq: inject I/O to underutilized actuators

The main service scheme of BFQ for sync I/O is serving one sync
bfq_queue at a time, for a while. In particular, BFQ enforces this
scheme when it de

block, bfq: inject I/O to underutilized actuators

The main service scheme of BFQ for sync I/O is serving one sync
bfq_queue at a time, for a while. In particular, BFQ enforces this
scheme when it deems the latter necessary to boost throughput or
to preserve service guarantees. Unfortunately, when BFQ enforces
this policy, only one actuator at a time gets served for a while,
because each bfq_queue contains I/O only for one actuator. The
other actuators may remain underutilized.

Actually, BFQ may serve (inject) extra I/O, taken from other
bfq_queues, in parallel with that of the in-service queue. This
injection mechanism may provide the ground for dealing also with
the above actuator-underutilization problem. Yet BFQ does not take
the actuator load into account when choosing which queue to pick
extra I/O from. In addition, BFQ may happen to inject extra I/O
only when the in-service queue is temporarily empty.

In view of these facts, this commit extends the
injection mechanism in such a way that the latter:
(1) takes into account also the actuator load;
(2) checks such a load on each dispatch, and injects I/O for an
underutilized actuator, if there is one and there is I/O for it.

To perform the check in (2), this commit introduces a load
threshold, currently set to 4. A linear scan of each actuator is
performed, until an actuator is found for which the following two
conditions hold: the load of the actuator is below the threshold,
and there is at least one non-in-service queue that contains I/O
for that actuator. If such a pair (actuator, queue) is found, then
the head request of that queue is returned for dispatch, instead
of the head request of the in-service queue.

We have set the threshold, empirically, to the minimum possible
value for which an actuator is fully utilized, or close to be
fully utilized. By doing so, injected I/O 'steals' as few
drive-queue slots as possibile to the in-service queue. This
reduces as much as possible the probability that the service of
I/O from the in-service bfq_queue gets delayed because of slot
exhaustion, i.e., because all the slots of the drive queue are
filled with I/O injected from other queues (NCQ provides for 32
slots).

This new mechanism also counters actuator underutilization in the
case of asymmetric configurations of bfq_queues. Namely if there
are few bfq_queues containing I/O for some actuators and many
bfq_queues containing I/O for other actuators. Or if the
bfq_queues containing I/O for some actuators have lower weights
than the other bfq_queues.

Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Davide Zini <davidezini2@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230103145503.71712-8-paolo.valente@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

show more ...

block, bfq: retrieve independent access ranges from request queue

This patch implements the code to gather the content of the
independent_access_ranges structure from the request_queue and copy
it i

block, bfq: retrieve independent access ranges from request queue

This patch implements the code to gather the content of the
independent_access_ranges structure from the request_queue and copy
it into the queue's bfq_data. This copy is done at queue initialization.

We copy the access ranges into the bfq_data to avoid taking the queue
lock each time we access the ranges.

This implementation, however, puts a limit to the maximum independent
ranges supported by the scheduler. Such a limit is equal to the constant
BFQ_MAX_ACTUATORS. This limit was placed to avoid the allocation of
dynamic memory.

Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>
Co-developed-by: Rory Chen <rory.c.chen@seagate.com>
Signed-off-by: Rory Chen <rory.c.chen@seagate.com>
Signed-off-by: Federico Gavioli <f.gavioli97@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230103145503.71712-7-paolo.valente@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

show more ...

block, bfq: split also async bfq_queues on a per-actuator basis

Similarly to sync bfq_queues, also async bfq_queues need to be split
on a per-actuator basis.

Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lem

block, bfq: split also async bfq_queues on a per-actuator basis

Similarly to sync bfq_queues, also async bfq_queues need to be split
on a per-actuator basis.

Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Davide Zini <davidezini2@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230103145503.71712-6-paolo.valente@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

show more ...

block, bfq: turn bfqq_data into an array in bfq_io_cq

When a bfq_queue Q is merged with another queue, several pieces of
information are saved about Q. These pieces are stored in the
bfqq_data field

block, bfq: turn bfqq_data into an array in bfq_io_cq

When a bfq_queue Q is merged with another queue, several pieces of
information are saved about Q. These pieces are stored in the
bfqq_data field in the bfq_io_cq data structure of the process
associated with Q.

Yet, with a multi-actuator drive, a process may get associated with
multiple bfq_queues: one queue for each of the N actuators. Each of
these queues may undergo a merge. So, the bfq_io_cq data structure
must be able to accommodate the above information for N queues.

This commit solves this problem by turning the bfqq_data scalar field
into an array of N elements (and by changing code so as to handle
this array).

This solution is written under the assumption that bfq_queues
associated with different actuators cannot be cross-merged. This
assumption holds naturally with basic queue merging: the latter is
triggered by spatial locality, and sectors for different actuators are
not close to each other (apart from the corner case of the last
sectors served by a given actuator and the first sectors served by the
next actuator). As for stable cross-merging, the assumption here is
that it is disabled.

Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Gabriele Felici <felicigb@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Gianmarco Lusvardi <glusvardi@posteo.net>
Signed-off-by: Giulio Barabino <giuliobarabino99@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Emiliano Maccaferri <inbox@emilianomaccaferri.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230103145503.71712-5-paolo.valente@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

show more ...

block, bfq: move io_cq-persistent bfqq data into a dedicated struct

With a multi-actuator drive, a process may get associated with multiple
bfq_queues: one queue for each of the N actuators. So, the

block, bfq: move io_cq-persistent bfqq data into a dedicated struct

With a multi-actuator drive, a process may get associated with multiple
bfq_queues: one queue for each of the N actuators. So, the bfq_io_cq
data structure must be able to accommodate its per-queue persistent
information for N queues. Currently it stores this information for
just one queue, in several scalar fields.

This is a preparatory commit for moving to accommodating persistent
information for N queues. In particular, this commit packs all the
above scalar fields into a single data structure. Then there is now
only one field, in bfq_io_cq, that stores all the above information. This
scalar field will then be turned into an array by a following commit.

Suggested-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Gianmarco Lusvardi <glusvardi@posteo.net>
Signed-off-by: Giulio Barabino <giuliobarabino99@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Emiliano Maccaferri <inbox@emilianomaccaferri.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230103145503.71712-4-paolo.valente@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

show more ...

block, bfq: split sync bfq_queues on a per-actuator basis

Single-LUN multi-actuator SCSI drives, as well as all multi-actuator
SATA drives appear as a single device to the I/O subsystem [1]. Yet
th

block, bfq: split sync bfq_queues on a per-actuator basis

Single-LUN multi-actuator SCSI drives, as well as all multi-actuator
SATA drives appear as a single device to the I/O subsystem [1]. Yet
they address commands to different actuators internally, as a function
of Logical Block Addressing (LBAs). A given sector is reachable by
only one of the actuators. For example, Seagate’s Serial Advanced
Technology Attachment (SATA) version contains two actuators and maps
the lower half of the SATA LBA space to the lower actuator and the
upper half to the upper actuator.

Evidently, to fully utilize actuators, no actuator must be left idle
or underutilized while there is pending I/O for it. The block layer
must somehow control the load of each actuator individually. This
commit lays the ground for allowing BFQ to provide such a per-actuator
control.

BFQ associates an I/O-request sync bfq_queue with each process doing
synchronous I/O, or with a group of processes, in case of queue
merging. Then BFQ serves one bfq_queue at a time. While in service, a
bfq_queue is emptied in request-position order. Yet the same process,
or group of processes, may generate I/O for different actuators. In
this case, different streams of I/O (each for a different actuator)
get all inserted into the same sync bfq_queue. So there is basically
no individual control on when each stream is served, i.e., on when the
I/O requests of the stream are picked from the bfq_queue and
dispatched to the drive.

This commit enables BFQ to control the service of each actuator
individually for synchronous I/O, by simply splitting each sync
bfq_queue into N queues, one for each actuator. In other words, a sync
bfq_queue is now associated to a pair (process, actuator). As a
consequence of this split, the per-queue proportional-share policy
implemented by BFQ will guarantee that the sync I/O generated for each
actuator, by each process, receives its fair share of service.

This is just a preparatory patch. If the I/O of the same process
happens to be sent to different queues, then each of these queues may
undergo queue merging. To handle this event, the bfq_io_cq data
structure must be properly extended. In addition, stable merging must
be disabled to avoid loss of control on individual actuators. Finally,
also async queues must be split. These issues are described in detail
and addressed in next commits. As for this commit, although multiple
per-process bfq_queues are provided, the I/O of each process or group
of processes is still sent to only one queue, regardless of the
actuator the I/O is for. The forwarding to distinct bfq_queues will be
enabled after addressing the above issues.

[1] https://www.linaro.org/blog/budget-fair-queueing-bfq-linux-io-scheduler-optimizations-for-multi-actuator-sata-hard-drives/

Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Gabriele Felici <felicigb@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Carmine Zaccagnino <carmine@carminezacc.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230103145503.71712-2-paolo.valente@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

show more ...

block, bfq: switch 'bfqg->ref' to use atomic refcount apis

The updating of 'bfqg->ref' should be protected by 'bfqd->lock', however,
during code review, we found that bfq_pd_free() update 'bfqg->ref

block, bfq: switch 'bfqg->ref' to use atomic refcount apis

The updating of 'bfqg->ref' should be protected by 'bfqd->lock', however,
during code review, we found that bfq_pd_free() update 'bfqg->ref'
without holding the lock, which is problematic:

1) bfq_pd_free() triggered by removing cgroup is called asynchronously;
2) bfqq will grab bfqg reference, and exit bfqq will drop the reference,
which can concurrent with 1).

Unfortunately, 'bfqd->lock' can't be held here because 'bfqd' might already
be freed in bfq_pd_free(). Fix the problem by using atomic refcount apis.

Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230103084755.1256479-1-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

show more ...

block, bfq: only do counting of pending-request for BFQ_GROUP_IOSCHED

The 'bfqd->num_groups_with_pending_reqs' is used when
CONFIG_BFQ_GROUP_IOSCHED is enabled, so let the variables and processes
ta

block, bfq: only do counting of pending-request for BFQ_GROUP_IOSCHED

The 'bfqd->num_groups_with_pending_reqs' is used when
CONFIG_BFQ_GROUP_IOSCHED is enabled, so let the variables and processes
take effect when CONFIG_BFQ_GROUP_IOSCHED is enabled.

Cc: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Yuwei Guan <Yuwei.Guan@zeekrlife.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221110112622.389332-1-Yuwei.Guan@zeekrlife.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

show more ...

block, bfq: don't declare 'bfqd' as type 'void *' in bfq_group

Prevent unnecessary format conversion for bfqg->bfqd in multiple
places.

Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan

block, bfq: don't declare 'bfqd' as type 'void *' in bfq_group

Prevent unnecessary format conversion for bfqg->bfqd in multiple
places.

Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Acked-by: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@unimore.it>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221102022542.3621219-6-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

show more ...

block, bfq: cleanup __bfq_weights_tree_remove()

It's the same with bfq_weights_tree_remove() now.

Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Acked-by: Paolo Va

block, bfq: cleanup __bfq_weights_tree_remove()

It's the same with bfq_weights_tree_remove() now.

Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Acked-by: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220916071942.214222-7-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

show more ...

block, bfq: cleanup bfq_weights_tree add/remove apis

The 'bfq_data' and 'rb_root_cached' can both be accessed through
'bfq_queue', thus only pass 'bfq_queue' as parameter.

Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <y

block, bfq: cleanup bfq_weights_tree add/remove apis

The 'bfq_data' and 'rb_root_cached' can both be accessed through
'bfq_queue', thus only pass 'bfq_queue' as parameter.

Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Acked-by: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220916071942.214222-6-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

show more ...

block, bfq: refactor the counting of 'num_groups_with_pending_reqs'

Currently, bfq can't handle sync io concurrently as long as they
are not issued from root group. This is because
'bfqd->num_groups

block, bfq: refactor the counting of 'num_groups_with_pending_reqs'

Currently, bfq can't handle sync io concurrently as long as they
are not issued from root group. This is because
'bfqd->num_groups_with_pending_reqs > 0' is always true in
bfq_asymmetric_scenario().

The way that bfqg is counted into 'num_groups_with_pending_reqs':

Before this patch:
1) root group will never be counted.
2) Count if bfqg or it's child bfqgs have pending requests.
3) Don't count if bfqg and it's child bfqgs complete all the requests.

After this patch:
1) root group is counted.
2) Count if bfqg have pending requests.
3) Don't count if bfqg complete all the requests.

With this change, the occasion that only one group is activated can be
detected, and next patch will support concurrent sync io in the
occasion.

Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Acked-by: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220916071942.214222-4-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

show more ...

block, bfq: record how many queues have pending requests

Prepare to refactor the counting of 'num_groups_with_pending_reqs'.

Add a counter in bfq_group, update it while tracking if bfqq have pendin

block, bfq: record how many queues have pending requests

Prepare to refactor the counting of 'num_groups_with_pending_reqs'.

Add a counter in bfq_group, update it while tracking if bfqq have pending
requests and when bfq_bfqq_move() is called.

Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Acked-by: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220916071942.214222-3-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

show more ...

block, bfq: support to track if bfqq has pending requests

If entity belongs to bfqq, then entity->in_groups_with_pending_reqs
is not used currently. This patch use it to track if bfqq has pending
re

block, bfq: support to track if bfqq has pending requests

If entity belongs to bfqq, then entity->in_groups_with_pending_reqs
is not used currently. This patch use it to track if bfqq has pending
requests through callers of weights_tree insertion and removal.

Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Acked-by: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220916071942.214222-2-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

show more ...

block, bfq: remove unused variable for bfq_queue

it defined in d0edc2473be9d, but there's nowhere to use it,
so remove it.

Signed-off-by: Yuwei Guan <Yuwei.Guan@zeekrlife.com>
Acked-by: Paolo Valen

block, bfq: remove unused variable for bfq_queue

it defined in d0edc2473be9d, but there's nowhere to use it,
so remove it.

Signed-off-by: Yuwei Guan <Yuwei.Guan@zeekrlife.com>
Acked-by: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018030139.159-1-Yuwei.Guan@zeekrlife.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

show more ...

block, bfq: remove useless parameter for bfq_add/del_bfqq_busy()

'bfqd' can be accessed through 'bfqq->bfqd', there is no need to pass
it as a parameter separately.

Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@

block, bfq: remove useless parameter for bfq_add/del_bfqq_busy()

'bfqd' can be accessed through 'bfqq->bfqd', there is no need to pass
it as a parameter separately.

Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220816015631.1323948-4-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

show more ...

block, bfq: remove unused functions

While doing code coverage testing(CONFIG_BFQ_CGROUP_DEBUG is disabled), we
found that some functions doesn't have caller, thus remove them.

Signed-off-by: Yu Kua

block, bfq: remove unused functions

While doing code coverage testing(CONFIG_BFQ_CGROUP_DEBUG is disabled), we
found that some functions doesn't have caller, thus remove them.

Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220816015631.1323948-2-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

show more ...

block/bfq: Use the new blk_opf_t type

Use the new blk_opf_t type for arguments and variables that represent
request flags or a bitwise combination of a request operation and
request flags. Rename th

block/bfq: Use the new blk_opf_t type

Use the new blk_opf_t type for arguments and variables that represent
request flags or a bitwise combination of a request operation and
request flags. Rename those variables from 'op' into 'opf'.

This patch does not change any functionality.

Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220714180729.1065367-8-bvanassche@acm.org
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

show more ...

bfq: Relax waker detection for shared queues

Currently we look for waker only if current queue has no requests. This
makes sense for bfq queues with a single process however for shared
queues when t

bfq: Relax waker detection for shared queues

Currently we look for waker only if current queue has no requests. This
makes sense for bfq queues with a single process however for shared
queues when there is a larger number of processes the condition that
queue has no requests is difficult to meet because often at least one
process has some request in flight although all the others are waiting
for the waker to do the work and this harms throughput. Relax the "no
queued request for bfq queue" condition to "the current task has no
queued requests yet". For this, we also need to start tracking number of
requests in flight for each task.

This patch (together with the following one) restores the performance
for dbench with 128 clients that regressed with commit c65e6fd460b4
("bfq: Do not let waker requests skip proper accounting") because
this commit makes requests of wakers properly enter BFQ queues and thus
these queues become ineligible for the old waker detection logic.
Dbench results:

Vanilla 5.18-rc3 5.18-rc3 + revert 5.18-rc3 patched
Mean 1237.36 ( 0.00%) 950.16 * 23.21%* 988.35 * 20.12%*

Numbers are time to complete workload so lower is better.

Fixes: c65e6fd460b4 ("bfq: Do not let waker requests skip proper accounting")
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220519105235.31397-1-jack@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

show more ...

blktrace: cleanup the __trace_note_message interface

Pass the cgroup_subsys_state instead of a the blkg so that blktrace
doesn't need to poke into blk-cgroup internals, and give the name a
blk prefi

blktrace: cleanup the __trace_note_message interface

Pass the cgroup_subsys_state instead of a the blkg so that blktrace
doesn't need to poke into blk-cgroup internals, and give the name a
blk prefix as the current name is way too generic for a public
interface.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220420042723.1010598-9-hch@lst.de
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

show more ...

bfq: Get rid of __bio_blkcg() usage

BFQ usage of __bio_blkcg() is a relict from the past. Furthermore if bio
would not be associated with any blkcg, the usage of __bio_blkcg() in
BFQ is prone to rac

bfq: Get rid of __bio_blkcg() usage

BFQ usage of __bio_blkcg() is a relict from the past. Furthermore if bio
would not be associated with any blkcg, the usage of __bio_blkcg() in
BFQ is prone to races with the task being migrated between cgroups as
__bio_blkcg() calls at different places could return different blkcgs.

Convert BFQ to the new situation where bio->bi_blkg is initialized in
bio_set_dev() and thus practically always valid. This allows us to save
blkcg_gq lookup and noticeably simplify the code.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 0fe061b9f03c ("blkcg: fix ref count issue with bio_blkcg() using task_css")
Tested-by: "yukuai (C)" <yukuai3@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220401102752.8599-8-jack@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

show more ...

bfq: Track whether bfq_group is still online

Track whether bfq_group is still online. We cannot rely on
blkcg_gq->online because that gets cleared only after all policies are
offlined and we need so

bfq: Track whether bfq_group is still online

Track whether bfq_group is still online. We cannot rely on
blkcg_gq->online because that gets cleared only after all policies are
offlined and we need something that gets updated already under
bfqd->lock when we are cleaning up our bfq_group to be able to guarantee
that when we see online bfq_group, it will stay online while we are
holding bfqd->lock lock.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org
Tested-by: "yukuai (C)" <yukuai3@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220401102752.8599-7-jack@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

show more ...