x86/pci: Skip early E820 check for ECAM region

commit 199f968f1484a14024d0d467211ffc2faf193eb4 upstream.

Arul, Mateusz, Imcarneiro91, and Aman reported a regression caused by
07eab0901ede ("efi/x86

x86/pci: Skip early E820 check for ECAM region

commit 199f968f1484a14024d0d467211ffc2faf193eb4 upstream.

Arul, Mateusz, Imcarneiro91, and Aman reported a regression caused by
07eab0901ede ("efi/x86: Remove EfiMemoryMappedIO from E820 map"). On the
Lenovo Legion 9i laptop, that commit removes the ECAM area from E820, which
means the early E820 validation fails, which means we don't enable ECAM in
the "early MCFG" path.

The static MCFG table describes ECAM without depending on the ACPI
interpreter. Many Legion 9i ACPI methods rely on that, so they fail when
PCI config access isn't available, resulting in the embedded controller,
PS/2, audio, trackpad, and battery devices not being detected. The _OSC
method also fails, so Linux can't take control of the PCIe hotplug, PME,
and AER features:

# pci_mmcfg_early_init()

PCI: ECAM [mem 0xc0000000-0xce0fffff] (base 0xc0000000) for domain 0000 [bus 00-e0]
PCI: not using ECAM ([mem 0xc0000000-0xce0fffff] not reserved)

ACPI Error: AE_ERROR, Returned by Handler for [PCI_Config] (20230628/evregion-300)
ACPI: Interpreter enabled
ACPI: Ignoring error and continuing table load
ACPI BIOS Error (bug): Could not resolve symbol [\_SB.PC00.RP01._SB.PC00], AE_NOT_FOUND (20230628/dswload2-162)
ACPI Error: AE_NOT_FOUND, During name lookup/catalog (20230628/psobject-220)
ACPI: Skipping parse of AML opcode: OpcodeName unavailable (0x0010)
ACPI BIOS Error (bug): Could not resolve symbol [\_SB.PC00.RP01._SB.PC00], AE_NOT_FOUND (20230628/dswload2-162)
ACPI Error: AE_NOT_FOUND, During name lookup/catalog (20230628/psobject-220)
...
ACPI Error: Aborting method \_SB.PC00._OSC due to previous error (AE_NOT_FOUND) (20230628/psparse-529)
acpi PNP0A08:00: _OSC: platform retains control of PCIe features (AE_NOT_FOUND)

# pci_mmcfg_late_init()

PCI: ECAM [mem 0xc0000000-0xce0fffff] (base 0xc0000000) for domain 0000 [bus 00-e0]
PCI: [Firmware Info]: ECAM [mem 0xc0000000-0xce0fffff] not reserved in ACPI motherboard resources
PCI: ECAM [mem 0xc0000000-0xce0fffff] is EfiMemoryMappedIO; assuming valid
PCI: ECAM [mem 0xc0000000-0xce0fffff] reserved to work around lack of ACPI motherboard _CRS

Per PCI Firmware r3.3, sec 4.1.2, ECAM space must be reserved by a PNP0C02
resource, but there's no requirement to mention it in E820, so we shouldn't
look at E820 to validate the ECAM space described by MCFG.

In 2006, 946f2ee5c731 ("[PATCH] i386/x86-64: Check that MCFG points to an
e820 reserved area") added a sanity check of E820 to work around buggy MCFG
tables, but that over-aggressive validation causes failures like this one.

Keep the E820 validation check for machines older than 2016, an arbitrary
ten years after 946f2ee5c731, so machines that depend on it don't break.

Skip the early E820 check for 2016 and newer BIOSes since there's no
requirement to describe ECAM in E820.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240417204012.215030-2-helgaas@kernel.org
Fixes: 07eab0901ede ("efi/x86: Remove EfiMemoryMappedIO from E820 map")
Reported-by: Mateusz Kaduk <mateusz.kaduk@gmail.com>
Closes: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218444
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Tested-by: Mateusz Kaduk <mateusz.kaduk@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

show more ...

x86/pci: Skip early E820 check for ECAM region

commit 199f968f1484a14024d0d467211ffc2faf193eb4 upstream.

Arul, Mateusz, Imcarneiro91, and Aman reported a regression caused by
07eab0901ede ("efi/x86

x86/pci: Skip early E820 check for ECAM region

commit 199f968f1484a14024d0d467211ffc2faf193eb4 upstream.

Arul, Mateusz, Imcarneiro91, and Aman reported a regression caused by
07eab0901ede ("efi/x86: Remove EfiMemoryMappedIO from E820 map"). On the
Lenovo Legion 9i laptop, that commit removes the ECAM area from E820, which
means the early E820 validation fails, which means we don't enable ECAM in
the "early MCFG" path.

The static MCFG table describes ECAM without depending on the ACPI
interpreter. Many Legion 9i ACPI methods rely on that, so they fail when
PCI config access isn't available, resulting in the embedded controller,
PS/2, audio, trackpad, and battery devices not being detected. The _OSC
method also fails, so Linux can't take control of the PCIe hotplug, PME,
and AER features:

# pci_mmcfg_early_init()

PCI: ECAM [mem 0xc0000000-0xce0fffff] (base 0xc0000000) for domain 0000 [bus 00-e0]
PCI: not using ECAM ([mem 0xc0000000-0xce0fffff] not reserved)

ACPI Error: AE_ERROR, Returned by Handler for [PCI_Config] (20230628/evregion-300)
ACPI: Interpreter enabled
ACPI: Ignoring error and continuing table load
ACPI BIOS Error (bug): Could not resolve symbol [\_SB.PC00.RP01._SB.PC00], AE_NOT_FOUND (20230628/dswload2-162)
ACPI Error: AE_NOT_FOUND, During name lookup/catalog (20230628/psobject-220)
ACPI: Skipping parse of AML opcode: OpcodeName unavailable (0x0010)
ACPI BIOS Error (bug): Could not resolve symbol [\_SB.PC00.RP01._SB.PC00], AE_NOT_FOUND (20230628/dswload2-162)
ACPI Error: AE_NOT_FOUND, During name lookup/catalog (20230628/psobject-220)
...
ACPI Error: Aborting method \_SB.PC00._OSC due to previous error (AE_NOT_FOUND) (20230628/psparse-529)
acpi PNP0A08:00: _OSC: platform retains control of PCIe features (AE_NOT_FOUND)

# pci_mmcfg_late_init()

PCI: ECAM [mem 0xc0000000-0xce0fffff] (base 0xc0000000) for domain 0000 [bus 00-e0]
PCI: [Firmware Info]: ECAM [mem 0xc0000000-0xce0fffff] not reserved in ACPI motherboard resources
PCI: ECAM [mem 0xc0000000-0xce0fffff] is EfiMemoryMappedIO; assuming valid
PCI: ECAM [mem 0xc0000000-0xce0fffff] reserved to work around lack of ACPI motherboard _CRS

Per PCI Firmware r3.3, sec 4.1.2, ECAM space must be reserved by a PNP0C02
resource, but there's no requirement to mention it in E820, so we shouldn't
look at E820 to validate the ECAM space described by MCFG.

In 2006, 946f2ee5c731 ("[PATCH] i386/x86-64: Check that MCFG points to an
e820 reserved area") added a sanity check of E820 to work around buggy MCFG
tables, but that over-aggressive validation causes failures like this one.

Keep the E820 validation check for machines older than 2016, an arbitrary
ten years after 946f2ee5c731, so machines that depend on it don't break.

Skip the early E820 check for 2016 and newer BIOSes since there's no
requirement to describe ECAM in E820.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240417204012.215030-2-helgaas@kernel.org
Fixes: 07eab0901ede ("efi/x86: Remove EfiMemoryMappedIO from E820 map")
Reported-by: Mateusz Kaduk <mateusz.kaduk@gmail.com>
Closes: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218444
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Tested-by: Mateusz Kaduk <mateusz.kaduk@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

show more ...

x86/pci: Skip early E820 check for ECAM region

commit 199f968f1484a14024d0d467211ffc2faf193eb4 upstream.

Arul, Mateusz, Imcarneiro91, and Aman reported a regression caused by
07eab0901ede ("efi/x86

x86/pci: Skip early E820 check for ECAM region

commit 199f968f1484a14024d0d467211ffc2faf193eb4 upstream.

Arul, Mateusz, Imcarneiro91, and Aman reported a regression caused by
07eab0901ede ("efi/x86: Remove EfiMemoryMappedIO from E820 map"). On the
Lenovo Legion 9i laptop, that commit removes the ECAM area from E820, which
means the early E820 validation fails, which means we don't enable ECAM in
the "early MCFG" path.

The static MCFG table describes ECAM without depending on the ACPI
interpreter. Many Legion 9i ACPI methods rely on that, so they fail when
PCI config access isn't available, resulting in the embedded controller,
PS/2, audio, trackpad, and battery devices not being detected. The _OSC
method also fails, so Linux can't take control of the PCIe hotplug, PME,
and AER features:

# pci_mmcfg_early_init()

PCI: ECAM [mem 0xc0000000-0xce0fffff] (base 0xc0000000) for domain 0000 [bus 00-e0]
PCI: not using ECAM ([mem 0xc0000000-0xce0fffff] not reserved)

ACPI Error: AE_ERROR, Returned by Handler for [PCI_Config] (20230628/evregion-300)
ACPI: Interpreter enabled
ACPI: Ignoring error and continuing table load
ACPI BIOS Error (bug): Could not resolve symbol [\_SB.PC00.RP01._SB.PC00], AE_NOT_FOUND (20230628/dswload2-162)
ACPI Error: AE_NOT_FOUND, During name lookup/catalog (20230628/psobject-220)
ACPI: Skipping parse of AML opcode: OpcodeName unavailable (0x0010)
ACPI BIOS Error (bug): Could not resolve symbol [\_SB.PC00.RP01._SB.PC00], AE_NOT_FOUND (20230628/dswload2-162)
ACPI Error: AE_NOT_FOUND, During name lookup/catalog (20230628/psobject-220)
...
ACPI Error: Aborting method \_SB.PC00._OSC due to previous error (AE_NOT_FOUND) (20230628/psparse-529)
acpi PNP0A08:00: _OSC: platform retains control of PCIe features (AE_NOT_FOUND)

# pci_mmcfg_late_init()

PCI: ECAM [mem 0xc0000000-0xce0fffff] (base 0xc0000000) for domain 0000 [bus 00-e0]
PCI: [Firmware Info]: ECAM [mem 0xc0000000-0xce0fffff] not reserved in ACPI motherboard resources
PCI: ECAM [mem 0xc0000000-0xce0fffff] is EfiMemoryMappedIO; assuming valid
PCI: ECAM [mem 0xc0000000-0xce0fffff] reserved to work around lack of ACPI motherboard _CRS

Per PCI Firmware r3.3, sec 4.1.2, ECAM space must be reserved by a PNP0C02
resource, but there's no requirement to mention it in E820, so we shouldn't
look at E820 to validate the ECAM space described by MCFG.

In 2006, 946f2ee5c731 ("[PATCH] i386/x86-64: Check that MCFG points to an
e820 reserved area") added a sanity check of E820 to work around buggy MCFG
tables, but that over-aggressive validation causes failures like this one.

Keep the E820 validation check for machines older than 2016, an arbitrary
ten years after 946f2ee5c731, so machines that depend on it don't break.

Skip the early E820 check for 2016 and newer BIOSes since there's no
requirement to describe ECAM in E820.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240417204012.215030-2-helgaas@kernel.org
Fixes: 07eab0901ede ("efi/x86: Remove EfiMemoryMappedIO from E820 map")
Reported-by: Mateusz Kaduk <mateusz.kaduk@gmail.com>
Closes: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218444
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Tested-by: Mateusz Kaduk <mateusz.kaduk@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

show more ...

x86/pci: Skip early E820 check for ECAM region

commit 199f968f1484a14024d0d467211ffc2faf193eb4 upstream.

Arul, Mateusz, Imcarneiro91, and Aman reported a regression caused by
07eab0901ede ("efi/x86

x86/pci: Skip early E820 check for ECAM region

commit 199f968f1484a14024d0d467211ffc2faf193eb4 upstream.

Arul, Mateusz, Imcarneiro91, and Aman reported a regression caused by
07eab0901ede ("efi/x86: Remove EfiMemoryMappedIO from E820 map"). On the
Lenovo Legion 9i laptop, that commit removes the ECAM area from E820, which
means the early E820 validation fails, which means we don't enable ECAM in
the "early MCFG" path.

The static MCFG table describes ECAM without depending on the ACPI
interpreter. Many Legion 9i ACPI methods rely on that, so they fail when
PCI config access isn't available, resulting in the embedded controller,
PS/2, audio, trackpad, and battery devices not being detected. The _OSC
method also fails, so Linux can't take control of the PCIe hotplug, PME,
and AER features:

# pci_mmcfg_early_init()

PCI: ECAM [mem 0xc0000000-0xce0fffff] (base 0xc0000000) for domain 0000 [bus 00-e0]
PCI: not using ECAM ([mem 0xc0000000-0xce0fffff] not reserved)

ACPI Error: AE_ERROR, Returned by Handler for [PCI_Config] (20230628/evregion-300)
ACPI: Interpreter enabled
ACPI: Ignoring error and continuing table load
ACPI BIOS Error (bug): Could not resolve symbol [\_SB.PC00.RP01._SB.PC00], AE_NOT_FOUND (20230628/dswload2-162)
ACPI Error: AE_NOT_FOUND, During name lookup/catalog (20230628/psobject-220)
ACPI: Skipping parse of AML opcode: OpcodeName unavailable (0x0010)
ACPI BIOS Error (bug): Could not resolve symbol [\_SB.PC00.RP01._SB.PC00], AE_NOT_FOUND (20230628/dswload2-162)
ACPI Error: AE_NOT_FOUND, During name lookup/catalog (20230628/psobject-220)
...
ACPI Error: Aborting method \_SB.PC00._OSC due to previous error (AE_NOT_FOUND) (20230628/psparse-529)
acpi PNP0A08:00: _OSC: platform retains control of PCIe features (AE_NOT_FOUND)

# pci_mmcfg_late_init()

PCI: ECAM [mem 0xc0000000-0xce0fffff] (base 0xc0000000) for domain 0000 [bus 00-e0]
PCI: [Firmware Info]: ECAM [mem 0xc0000000-0xce0fffff] not reserved in ACPI motherboard resources
PCI: ECAM [mem 0xc0000000-0xce0fffff] is EfiMemoryMappedIO; assuming valid
PCI: ECAM [mem 0xc0000000-0xce0fffff] reserved to work around lack of ACPI motherboard _CRS

Per PCI Firmware r3.3, sec 4.1.2, ECAM space must be reserved by a PNP0C02
resource, but there's no requirement to mention it in E820, so we shouldn't
look at E820 to validate the ECAM space described by MCFG.

In 2006, 946f2ee5c731 ("[PATCH] i386/x86-64: Check that MCFG points to an
e820 reserved area") added a sanity check of E820 to work around buggy MCFG
tables, but that over-aggressive validation causes failures like this one.

Keep the E820 validation check for machines older than 2016, an arbitrary
ten years after 946f2ee5c731, so machines that depend on it don't break.

Skip the early E820 check for 2016 and newer BIOSes since there's no
requirement to describe ECAM in E820.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240417204012.215030-2-helgaas@kernel.org
Fixes: 07eab0901ede ("efi/x86: Remove EfiMemoryMappedIO from E820 map")
Reported-by: Mateusz Kaduk <mateusz.kaduk@gmail.com>
Closes: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218444
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Tested-by: Mateusz Kaduk <mateusz.kaduk@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

show more ...

x86/pci: Skip early E820 check for ECAM region

commit 199f968f1484a14024d0d467211ffc2faf193eb4 upstream.

Arul, Mateusz, Imcarneiro91, and Aman reported a regression caused by
07eab0901ede ("efi/x86

x86/pci: Skip early E820 check for ECAM region

commit 199f968f1484a14024d0d467211ffc2faf193eb4 upstream.

Arul, Mateusz, Imcarneiro91, and Aman reported a regression caused by
07eab0901ede ("efi/x86: Remove EfiMemoryMappedIO from E820 map"). On the
Lenovo Legion 9i laptop, that commit removes the ECAM area from E820, which
means the early E820 validation fails, which means we don't enable ECAM in
the "early MCFG" path.

The static MCFG table describes ECAM without depending on the ACPI
interpreter. Many Legion 9i ACPI methods rely on that, so they fail when
PCI config access isn't available, resulting in the embedded controller,
PS/2, audio, trackpad, and battery devices not being detected. The _OSC
method also fails, so Linux can't take control of the PCIe hotplug, PME,
and AER features:

# pci_mmcfg_early_init()

PCI: ECAM [mem 0xc0000000-0xce0fffff] (base 0xc0000000) for domain 0000 [bus 00-e0]
PCI: not using ECAM ([mem 0xc0000000-0xce0fffff] not reserved)

ACPI Error: AE_ERROR, Returned by Handler for [PCI_Config] (20230628/evregion-300)
ACPI: Interpreter enabled
ACPI: Ignoring error and continuing table load
ACPI BIOS Error (bug): Could not resolve symbol [\_SB.PC00.RP01._SB.PC00], AE_NOT_FOUND (20230628/dswload2-162)
ACPI Error: AE_NOT_FOUND, During name lookup/catalog (20230628/psobject-220)
ACPI: Skipping parse of AML opcode: OpcodeName unavailable (0x0010)
ACPI BIOS Error (bug): Could not resolve symbol [\_SB.PC00.RP01._SB.PC00], AE_NOT_FOUND (20230628/dswload2-162)
ACPI Error: AE_NOT_FOUND, During name lookup/catalog (20230628/psobject-220)
...
ACPI Error: Aborting method \_SB.PC00._OSC due to previous error (AE_NOT_FOUND) (20230628/psparse-529)
acpi PNP0A08:00: _OSC: platform retains control of PCIe features (AE_NOT_FOUND)

# pci_mmcfg_late_init()

PCI: ECAM [mem 0xc0000000-0xce0fffff] (base 0xc0000000) for domain 0000 [bus 00-e0]
PCI: [Firmware Info]: ECAM [mem 0xc0000000-0xce0fffff] not reserved in ACPI motherboard resources
PCI: ECAM [mem 0xc0000000-0xce0fffff] is EfiMemoryMappedIO; assuming valid
PCI: ECAM [mem 0xc0000000-0xce0fffff] reserved to work around lack of ACPI motherboard _CRS

Per PCI Firmware r3.3, sec 4.1.2, ECAM space must be reserved by a PNP0C02
resource, but there's no requirement to mention it in E820, so we shouldn't
look at E820 to validate the ECAM space described by MCFG.

In 2006, 946f2ee5c731 ("[PATCH] i386/x86-64: Check that MCFG points to an
e820 reserved area") added a sanity check of E820 to work around buggy MCFG
tables, but that over-aggressive validation causes failures like this one.

Keep the E820 validation check for machines older than 2016, an arbitrary
ten years after 946f2ee5c731, so machines that depend on it don't break.

Skip the early E820 check for 2016 and newer BIOSes since there's no
requirement to describe ECAM in E820.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240417204012.215030-2-helgaas@kernel.org
Fixes: 07eab0901ede ("efi/x86: Remove EfiMemoryMappedIO from E820 map")
Reported-by: Mateusz Kaduk <mateusz.kaduk@gmail.com>
Closes: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218444
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Tested-by: Mateusz Kaduk <mateusz.kaduk@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

show more ...

x86/pci: Skip early E820 check for ECAM region

commit 199f968f1484a14024d0d467211ffc2faf193eb4 upstream.

Arul, Mateusz, Imcarneiro91, and Aman reported a regression caused by
07eab0901ede ("efi/x86

x86/pci: Skip early E820 check for ECAM region

commit 199f968f1484a14024d0d467211ffc2faf193eb4 upstream.

Arul, Mateusz, Imcarneiro91, and Aman reported a regression caused by
07eab0901ede ("efi/x86: Remove EfiMemoryMappedIO from E820 map"). On the
Lenovo Legion 9i laptop, that commit removes the ECAM area from E820, which
means the early E820 validation fails, which means we don't enable ECAM in
the "early MCFG" path.

The static MCFG table describes ECAM without depending on the ACPI
interpreter. Many Legion 9i ACPI methods rely on that, so they fail when
PCI config access isn't available, resulting in the embedded controller,
PS/2, audio, trackpad, and battery devices not being detected. The _OSC
method also fails, so Linux can't take control of the PCIe hotplug, PME,
and AER features:

# pci_mmcfg_early_init()

PCI: ECAM [mem 0xc0000000-0xce0fffff] (base 0xc0000000) for domain 0000 [bus 00-e0]
PCI: not using ECAM ([mem 0xc0000000-0xce0fffff] not reserved)

ACPI Error: AE_ERROR, Returned by Handler for [PCI_Config] (20230628/evregion-300)
ACPI: Interpreter enabled
ACPI: Ignoring error and continuing table load
ACPI BIOS Error (bug): Could not resolve symbol [\_SB.PC00.RP01._SB.PC00], AE_NOT_FOUND (20230628/dswload2-162)
ACPI Error: AE_NOT_FOUND, During name lookup/catalog (20230628/psobject-220)
ACPI: Skipping parse of AML opcode: OpcodeName unavailable (0x0010)
ACPI BIOS Error (bug): Could not resolve symbol [\_SB.PC00.RP01._SB.PC00], AE_NOT_FOUND (20230628/dswload2-162)
ACPI Error: AE_NOT_FOUND, During name lookup/catalog (20230628/psobject-220)
...
ACPI Error: Aborting method \_SB.PC00._OSC due to previous error (AE_NOT_FOUND) (20230628/psparse-529)
acpi PNP0A08:00: _OSC: platform retains control of PCIe features (AE_NOT_FOUND)

# pci_mmcfg_late_init()

PCI: ECAM [mem 0xc0000000-0xce0fffff] (base 0xc0000000) for domain 0000 [bus 00-e0]
PCI: [Firmware Info]: ECAM [mem 0xc0000000-0xce0fffff] not reserved in ACPI motherboard resources
PCI: ECAM [mem 0xc0000000-0xce0fffff] is EfiMemoryMappedIO; assuming valid
PCI: ECAM [mem 0xc0000000-0xce0fffff] reserved to work around lack of ACPI motherboard _CRS

Per PCI Firmware r3.3, sec 4.1.2, ECAM space must be reserved by a PNP0C02
resource, but there's no requirement to mention it in E820, so we shouldn't
look at E820 to validate the ECAM space described by MCFG.

In 2006, 946f2ee5c731 ("[PATCH] i386/x86-64: Check that MCFG points to an
e820 reserved area") added a sanity check of E820 to work around buggy MCFG
tables, but that over-aggressive validation causes failures like this one.

Keep the E820 validation check for machines older than 2016, an arbitrary
ten years after 946f2ee5c731, so machines that depend on it don't break.

Skip the early E820 check for 2016 and newer BIOSes since there's no
requirement to describe ECAM in E820.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240417204012.215030-2-helgaas@kernel.org
Fixes: 07eab0901ede ("efi/x86: Remove EfiMemoryMappedIO from E820 map")
Reported-by: Mateusz Kaduk <mateusz.kaduk@gmail.com>
Closes: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218444
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Tested-by: Mateusz Kaduk <mateusz.kaduk@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

show more ...

x86/pci: Skip early E820 check for ECAM region

commit 199f968f1484a14024d0d467211ffc2faf193eb4 upstream.

Arul, Mateusz, Imcarneiro91, and Aman reported a regression caused by
07eab0901ede ("efi/x86

x86/pci: Skip early E820 check for ECAM region

commit 199f968f1484a14024d0d467211ffc2faf193eb4 upstream.

Arul, Mateusz, Imcarneiro91, and Aman reported a regression caused by
07eab0901ede ("efi/x86: Remove EfiMemoryMappedIO from E820 map"). On the
Lenovo Legion 9i laptop, that commit removes the ECAM area from E820, which
means the early E820 validation fails, which means we don't enable ECAM in
the "early MCFG" path.

The static MCFG table describes ECAM without depending on the ACPI
interpreter. Many Legion 9i ACPI methods rely on that, so they fail when
PCI config access isn't available, resulting in the embedded controller,
PS/2, audio, trackpad, and battery devices not being detected. The _OSC
method also fails, so Linux can't take control of the PCIe hotplug, PME,
and AER features:

# pci_mmcfg_early_init()

PCI: ECAM [mem 0xc0000000-0xce0fffff] (base 0xc0000000) for domain 0000 [bus 00-e0]
PCI: not using ECAM ([mem 0xc0000000-0xce0fffff] not reserved)

ACPI Error: AE_ERROR, Returned by Handler for [PCI_Config] (20230628/evregion-300)
ACPI: Interpreter enabled
ACPI: Ignoring error and continuing table load
ACPI BIOS Error (bug): Could not resolve symbol [\_SB.PC00.RP01._SB.PC00], AE_NOT_FOUND (20230628/dswload2-162)
ACPI Error: AE_NOT_FOUND, During name lookup/catalog (20230628/psobject-220)
ACPI: Skipping parse of AML opcode: OpcodeName unavailable (0x0010)
ACPI BIOS Error (bug): Could not resolve symbol [\_SB.PC00.RP01._SB.PC00], AE_NOT_FOUND (20230628/dswload2-162)
ACPI Error: AE_NOT_FOUND, During name lookup/catalog (20230628/psobject-220)
...
ACPI Error: Aborting method \_SB.PC00._OSC due to previous error (AE_NOT_FOUND) (20230628/psparse-529)
acpi PNP0A08:00: _OSC: platform retains control of PCIe features (AE_NOT_FOUND)

# pci_mmcfg_late_init()

PCI: ECAM [mem 0xc0000000-0xce0fffff] (base 0xc0000000) for domain 0000 [bus 00-e0]
PCI: [Firmware Info]: ECAM [mem 0xc0000000-0xce0fffff] not reserved in ACPI motherboard resources
PCI: ECAM [mem 0xc0000000-0xce0fffff] is EfiMemoryMappedIO; assuming valid
PCI: ECAM [mem 0xc0000000-0xce0fffff] reserved to work around lack of ACPI motherboard _CRS

Per PCI Firmware r3.3, sec 4.1.2, ECAM space must be reserved by a PNP0C02
resource, but there's no requirement to mention it in E820, so we shouldn't
look at E820 to validate the ECAM space described by MCFG.

In 2006, 946f2ee5c731 ("[PATCH] i386/x86-64: Check that MCFG points to an
e820 reserved area") added a sanity check of E820 to work around buggy MCFG
tables, but that over-aggressive validation causes failures like this one.

Keep the E820 validation check for machines older than 2016, an arbitrary
ten years after 946f2ee5c731, so machines that depend on it don't break.

Skip the early E820 check for 2016 and newer BIOSes since there's no
requirement to describe ECAM in E820.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240417204012.215030-2-helgaas@kernel.org
Fixes: 07eab0901ede ("efi/x86: Remove EfiMemoryMappedIO from E820 map")
Reported-by: Mateusz Kaduk <mateusz.kaduk@gmail.com>
Closes: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218444
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Tested-by: Mateusz Kaduk <mateusz.kaduk@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

show more ...

x86/pci: Reserve ECAM if BIOS didn't include it in PNP0C02 _CRS

commit 070909e56a7d65fd0b4aad6e808966b7c634befe upstream.

Tomasz, Sebastian, and some Proxmox users reported problems initializing
ix

x86/pci: Reserve ECAM if BIOS didn't include it in PNP0C02 _CRS

commit 070909e56a7d65fd0b4aad6e808966b7c634befe upstream.

Tomasz, Sebastian, and some Proxmox users reported problems initializing
ixgbe NICs.

I think the problem is that ECAM space described in the ACPI MCFG table is
not reserved via a PNP0C02 _CRS method as required by the PCI Firmware spec
(r3.3, sec 4.1.2), but it *is* included in the PNP0A03 host bridge _CRS as
part of the MMIO aperture.

If we allocate space for a PCI BAR, we're likely to allocate it from that
ECAM space, which obviously cannot work.

This could happen for any device, but in the ixgbe case it happens because
it's an SR-IOV device and the BIOS didn't allocate space for the VF BARs,
so Linux reallocated the bridge window leading to ixgbe and put it on top
of the ECAM space. From Tomasz' system:

PCI: MMCONFIG for domain 0000 [bus 00-ff] at [mem 0x80000000-0x8fffffff] (base 0x80000000)
PCI: MMCONFIG at [mem 0x80000000-0x8fffffff] not reserved in ACPI motherboard resources
pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [mem 0x80000000-0xfbffffff window]

pci 0000:00:01.1: PCI bridge to [bus 02-03]
pci 0000:00:01.1: bridge window [mem 0xfb900000-0xfbbfffff]
pci 0000:02:00.0: [8086:10fb] type 00 class 0x020000 # ixgbe
pci 0000:02:00.0: reg 0x10: [mem 0xfba80000-0xfbafffff 64bit]
pci 0000:02:00.0: VF(n) BAR0 space: [mem 0x00000000-0x000fffff 64bit] (contains BAR0 for 64 VFs)
pci 0000:02:00.0: BAR 7: no space for [mem size 0x00100000 64bit] # VF BAR 0

pci_bus 0000:00: No. 2 try to assign unassigned res
pci 0000:00:01.1: resource 14 [mem 0xfb900000-0xfbbfffff] released
pci 0000:00:01.1: BAR 14: assigned [mem 0x80000000-0x806fffff]
pci 0000:02:00.0: BAR 0: assigned [mem 0x80000000-0x8007ffff 64bit]
pci 0000:02:00.0: BAR 7: assigned [mem 0x80204000-0x80303fff 64bit] # VF BAR 0

Fixes: 07eab0901ede ("efi/x86: Remove EfiMemoryMappedIO from E820 map")
Fixes: fd3a8cff4d4a ("x86/pci: Treat EfiMemoryMappedIO as reservation of ECAM space")
Reported-by: Tomasz Pala <gotar@polanet.pl>
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218050
Reported-by: Sebastian Manciulea <manciuleas@protonmail.com>
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218107
Link: https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/proxmox-8-kernel-6-2-16-4-pve-ixgbe-driver-fails-to-load-due-to-pci-device-probing-failure.131203/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231121183643.249006-2-helgaas@kernel.org
Tested-by: Tomasz Pala <gotar@polanet.pl>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v6.2+
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

show more ...

x86/pci: Treat EfiMemoryMappedIO as reservation of ECAM space

Normally we reject ECAM space unless it is reported as reserved in the E820
table or via a PNP0C02 _CRS method (PCI Firmware, r3.3, sec

x86/pci: Treat EfiMemoryMappedIO as reservation of ECAM space

Normally we reject ECAM space unless it is reported as reserved in the E820
table or via a PNP0C02 _CRS method (PCI Firmware, r3.3, sec 4.1.2).

07eab0901ede ("efi/x86: Remove EfiMemoryMappedIO from E820 map"), removes
E820 entries that correspond to EfiMemoryMappedIO regions because some
other firmware uses EfiMemoryMappedIO for PCI host bridge windows, and the
E820 entries prevent Linux from allocating BAR space for hot-added devices.

Some firmware doesn't report ECAM space via PNP0C02 _CRS methods, but does
mention it as an EfiMemoryMappedIO region via EFI GetMemoryMap(), which is
normally converted to an E820 entry by a bootloader or EFI stub. After
07eab0901ede, that E820 entry is removed, so we reject this ECAM space,
which makes PCI extended config space (offsets 0x100-0xfff) inaccessible.

The lack of extended config space breaks anything that relies on it,
including perf, VSEC telemetry, EDAC, QAT, SR-IOV, etc.

Allow use of ECAM for extended config space when the region is covered by
an EfiMemoryMappedIO region, even if it's not included in E820 or PNP0C02
_CRS.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/ac2693d8-8ba3-72e0-5b66-b3ae008d539d@linux.intel.com
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216891
Fixes: 07eab0901ede ("efi/x86: Remove EfiMemoryMappedIO from E820 map")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230110180243.1590045-3-helgaas@kernel.org
Reported-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Reported-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Reported-by: Giovanni Cabiddu <giovanni.cabiddu@intel.com>
Reported-by: Yunying Sun <yunying.sun@intel.com>
Reported-by: Baowen Zheng <baowen.zheng@corigine.com>
Reported-by: Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.duan@intel.com>
Reported-by: Yang Lixiao <lixiao.yang@intel.com>
Tested-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Tested-by: Giovanni Cabiddu <giovanni.cabiddu@intel.com>
Tested-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Yunying Sun <yunying.sun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org>

show more ...

x86/pci: Simplify is_mmconf_reserved() messages

is_mmconf_reserved() takes a "with_e820" parameter that only determines the
message logged if it finds the MMCONFIG region is reserved. Pass the
mess

x86/pci: Simplify is_mmconf_reserved() messages

is_mmconf_reserved() takes a "with_e820" parameter that only determines the
message logged if it finds the MMCONFIG region is reserved. Pass the
message directly, which will simplify a future patch that adds a new way of
looking for that reservation. No functional change intended.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230110180243.1590045-2-helgaas@kernel.org
Tested-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Tested-by: Giovanni Cabiddu <giovanni.cabiddu@intel.com>
Tested-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>

show more ...

x86/pci: Return true/false (not 1/0) from bool functions

Return boolean values ("true" or "false") instead of 1 or 0 from bool
functions. This fixes the following warnings from coccicheck:

./arc

x86/pci: Return true/false (not 1/0) from bool functions

Return boolean values ("true" or "false") instead of 1 or 0 from bool
functions. This fixes the following warnings from coccicheck:

./arch/x86/pci/mmconfig-shared.c:464:9-10: WARNING: return of 0/1 in function 'is_mmconf_reserved' with return type bool
./arch/x86/pci/mmconfig-shared.c:493:5-6: WARNING: return of 0/1 in function 'is_mmconf_reserved' with return type bool
./arch/x86/pci/mmconfig-shared.c:501:9-10: WARNING: return of 0/1 in function 'is_mmconf_reserved' with return type bool
./arch/x86/pci/mmconfig-shared.c:522:5-6: WARNING: return of 0/1 in function 'is_mmconf_reserved' with return type bool

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1615794000-102771-1-git-send-email-yang.lee@linux.alibaba.com
Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Yang Li <yang.lee@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@linux.com>

show more ...

sfi: Remove framework for deprecated firmware

SFI-based platforms are gone. So does this framework.

This removes mention of SFI through the drivers and other code as well.

Signed-off-by: Andy Shev

sfi: Remove framework for deprecated firmware

SFI-based platforms are gone. So does this framework.

This removes mention of SFI through the drivers and other code as well.

Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

show more ...

x86/pci: Fix the function type for check_reserved_t

e820__mapped_all() is passed as a callback to is_mmconf_reserved(),
which expects a function of type:

typedef bool (*check_reserved_t)(u64 star

x86/pci: Fix the function type for check_reserved_t

e820__mapped_all() is passed as a callback to is_mmconf_reserved(),
which expects a function of type:

typedef bool (*check_reserved_t)(u64 start, u64 end, unsigned type);

However, e820__mapped_all() accepts enum e820_type as the last argument
and this type mismatch trips indirect call checking with Clang's
Control-Flow Integrity (CFI).

As is_mmconf_reserved() only passes enum e820_type values for the
type argument, change the typedef and the unused type argument in
is_acpi_reserved() to enum e820_type to fix the type mismatch.

Reported-by: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com>
Suggested-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Signed-off-by: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201130193900.456726-1-samitolvanen@google.com

show more ...

x86/pci: Pass lockdep condition to pcm_mmcfg_list iterator

The pcm_mmcfg_list is traversed by list_for_each_entry_rcu() outside
of an RCU read-side critical section, which is safe because the
pci_mm

x86/pci: Pass lockdep condition to pcm_mmcfg_list iterator

The pcm_mmcfg_list is traversed by list_for_each_entry_rcu() outside
of an RCU read-side critical section, which is safe because the
pci_mmcfg_lock is held. This commit therefore adds a lockdep expression
to list_for_each_entry_rcu() in order t avoid lockdep warnings.

Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>

show more ...

x86/jailhouse: Enable PCI mmconfig access in inmates

Use the PCI mmconfig base address exported by jailhouse in boot parameters
in order to access the memory mapped PCI configuration space.

[Jan: r

x86/jailhouse: Enable PCI mmconfig access in inmates

Use the PCI mmconfig base address exported by jailhouse in boot parameters
in order to access the memory mapped PCI configuration space.

[Jan: rebased, fixed !CONFIG_PCI_MMCONFIG, used pcibios_last_bus]

Signed-off-by: Otavio Pontes <otavio.pontes@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Cc: jailhouse-dev@googlegroups.com
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Cc: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/2ee9e4401fa22377b3965893a558120f169be82b.1520408357.git.jan.kiszka@siemens.com

show more ...

x86/pci: Simplify code by using the new dmi_get_bios_year() helper

...instead of open coding its functionality.

No changes in functionality.

Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux

x86/pci: Simplify code by using the new dmi_get_bios_year() helper

...instead of open coding its functionality.

No changes in functionality.

Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180222125923.57385-2-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

show more ...

License cleanup: add SPDX GPL-2.0 license identifier to files with no license

Many source files in the tree are missing licensing information, which
makes it harder for compliance tools to determine

License cleanup: add SPDX GPL-2.0 license identifier to files with no license

Many source files in the tree are missing licensing information, which
makes it harder for compliance tools to determine the correct license.

By default all files without license information are under the default
license of the kernel, which is GPL version 2.

Update the files which contain no license information with the 'GPL-2.0'
SPDX license identifier. The SPDX identifier is a legally binding
shorthand, which can be used instead of the full boiler plate text.

This patch is based on work done by Thomas Gleixner and Kate Stewart and
Philippe Ombredanne.

How this work was done:

Patches were generated and checked against linux-4.14-rc6 for a subset of
the use cases:
- file had no licensing information it it.
- file was a */uapi/* one with no licensing information in it,
- file was a */uapi/* one with existing licensing information,

Further patches will be generated in subsequent months to fix up cases
where non-standard license headers were used, and references to license
had to be inferred by heuristics based on keywords.

The analysis to determine which SPDX License Identifier to be applied to
a file was done in a spreadsheet of side by side results from of the
output of two independent scanners (ScanCode & Windriver) producing SPDX
tag:value files created by Philippe Ombredanne. Philippe prepared the
base worksheet, and did an initial spot review of a few 1000 files.

The 4.13 kernel was the starting point of the analysis with 60,537 files
assessed. Kate Stewart did a file by file comparison of the scanner
results in the spreadsheet to determine which SPDX license identifier(s)
to be applied to the file. She confirmed any determination that was not
immediately clear with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.

Criteria used to select files for SPDX license identifier tagging was:
- Files considered eligible had to be source code files.
- Make and config files were included as candidates if they contained >5
lines of source
- File already had some variant of a license header in it (even if <5
lines).

All documentation files were explicitly excluded.

The following heuristics were used to determine which SPDX license
identifiers to apply.

- when both scanners couldn't find any license traces, file was
considered to have no license information in it, and the top level
COPYING file license applied.

For non */uapi/* files that summary was:

SPDX license identifier # files
---------------------------------------------------|-------
GPL-2.0 11139

and resulted in the first patch in this series.

If that file was a */uapi/* path one, it was "GPL-2.0 WITH
Linux-syscall-note" otherwise it was "GPL-2.0". Results of that was:

SPDX license identifier # files
---------------------------------------------------|-------
GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 930

and resulted in the second patch in this series.

- if a file had some form of licensing information in it, and was one
of the */uapi/* ones, it was denoted with the Linux-syscall-note if
any GPL family license was found in the file or had no licensing in
it (per prior point). Results summary:

SPDX license identifier # files
---------------------------------------------------|------
GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 270
GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 169
((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-2-Clause) 21
((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 17
LGPL-2.1+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 15
GPL-1.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 14
((GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 5
LGPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 4
LGPL-2.1 WITH Linux-syscall-note 3
((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR MIT) 3
((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) AND MIT) 1

and that resulted in the third patch in this series.

- when the two scanners agreed on the detected license(s), that became
the concluded license(s).

- when there was disagreement between the two scanners (one detected a
license but the other didn't, or they both detected different
licenses) a manual inspection of the file occurred.

- In most cases a manual inspection of the information in the file
resulted in a clear resolution of the license that should apply (and
which scanner probably needed to revisit its heuristics).

- When it was not immediately clear, the license identifier was
confirmed with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.

- If there was any question as to the appropriate license identifier,
the file was flagged for further research and to be revisited later
in time.

In total, over 70 hours of logged manual review was done on the
spreadsheet to determine the SPDX license identifiers to apply to the
source files by Kate, Philippe, Thomas and, in some cases, confirmation
by lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.

Kate also obtained a third independent scan of the 4.13 code base from
FOSSology, and compared selected files where the other two scanners
disagreed against that SPDX file, to see if there was new insights. The
Windriver scanner is based on an older version of FOSSology in part, so
they are related.

Thomas did random spot checks in about 500 files from the spreadsheets
for the uapi headers and agreed with SPDX license identifier in the
files he inspected. For the non-uapi files Thomas did random spot checks
in about 15000 files.

In initial set of patches against 4.14-rc6, 3 files were found to have
copy/paste license identifier errors, and have been fixed to reflect the
correct identifier.

Additionally Philippe spent 10 hours this week doing a detailed manual
inspection and review of the 12,461 patched files from the initial patch
version early this week with:
- a full scancode scan run, collecting the matched texts, detected
license ids and scores
- reviewing anything where there was a license detected (about 500+
files) to ensure that the applied SPDX license was correct
- reviewing anything where there was no detection but the patch license
was not GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note to ensure that the applied
SPDX license was correct

This produced a worksheet with 20 files needing minor correction. This
worksheet was then exported into 3 different .csv files for the
different types of files to be modified.

These .csv files were then reviewed by Greg. Thomas wrote a script to
parse the csv files and add the proper SPDX tag to the file, in the
format that the file expected. This script was further refined by Greg
based on the output to detect more types of files automatically and to
distinguish between header and source .c files (which need different
comment types.) Finally Greg ran the script using the .csv files to
generate the patches.

Reviewed-by: Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

show more ...

x86/boot/e820: Use bool in query APIs

Change e820__mapped_any() and e820__mapped_all()'s return type and
e820__range_remove()'s check_type parameter to bool.

Propagate it into arch/x86/pci/mmconfig

x86/boot/e820: Use bool in query APIs

Change e820__mapped_any() and e820__mapped_all()'s return type and
e820__range_remove()'s check_type parameter to bool.

Propagate it into arch/x86/pci/mmconfig-shared.c as this change
affects a function signature there too.

No change in functionality.

Cc: Alex Thorlton <athorlton@sgi.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Huang, Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

show more ...

x86/boot/e820: Prefix the E820_* type names with "E820_TYPE_"

So there's a number of constants that start with "E820" but which
are not types - these create a confusing mixture when seen together
wi

x86/boot/e820: Prefix the E820_* type names with "E820_TYPE_"

So there's a number of constants that start with "E820" but which
are not types - these create a confusing mixture when seen together
with 'enum e820_type' values:

E820MAP
E820NR
E820_X_MAX
E820MAX

To better differentiate the 'enum e820_type' values prefix them
with E820_TYPE_.

No change in functionality.

Cc: Alex Thorlton <athorlton@sgi.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Huang, Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

show more ...

x86/boot/e820: Rename e820_any_mapped()/e820_all_mapped() to e820__mapped_any()/e820__mapped_all()

The 'any' and 'all' are modified to the 'mapped' concept, so move them last in the name.

No change

x86/boot/e820: Rename e820_any_mapped()/e820_all_mapped() to e820__mapped_any()/e820__mapped_all()

The 'any' and 'all' are modified to the 'mapped' concept, so move them last in the name.

No change in functionality.

Cc: Alex Thorlton <athorlton@sgi.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Huang, Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

show more ...

x86/boot/e820: Move asm/e820.h to asm/e820/api.h

In line with asm/e820/types.h, move the e820 API declarations to
asm/e820/api.h and update all usage sites.

This is just a mechanical, obviously cor

x86/boot/e820: Move asm/e820.h to asm/e820/api.h

In line with asm/e820/types.h, move the e820 API declarations to
asm/e820/api.h and update all usage sites.

This is just a mechanical, obviously correct move & replace patch,
there will be subsequent changes to clean up the code and to make
better use of the new header organization.

Cc: Alex Thorlton <athorlton@sgi.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Huang, Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

show more ...

ACPICA: Resources: Provide common part for struct acpi_resource_address structures.

struct acpi_resource_address and struct acpi_resource_extended_address64 share substracts
just at different offset

ACPICA: Resources: Provide common part for struct acpi_resource_address structures.

struct acpi_resource_address and struct acpi_resource_extended_address64 share substracts
just at different offsets. To unify the parsing functions, OSPMs like Linux
need a new ACPI_ADDRESS64_ATTRIBUTE as their substructs, so they can
extract the shared data.

This patch also synchronizes the structure changes to the Linux kernel.
The usages are searched by matching the following keywords:
1. acpi_resource_address
2. acpi_resource_extended_address
3. ACPI_RESOURCE_TYPE_ADDRESS
4. ACPI_RESOURCE_TYPE_EXTENDED_ADDRESS
And we found and fixed the usages in the following files:
arch/ia64/kernel/acpi-ext.c
arch/ia64/pci/pci.c
arch/x86/pci/acpi.c
arch/x86/pci/mmconfig-shared.c
drivers/xen/xen-acpi-memhotplug.c
drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c
drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
drivers/acpi/resource.c
drivers/char/hpet.c
drivers/pnp/pnpacpi/rsparser.c
drivers/hv/vmbus_drv.c

Build tests are passed with defconfig/allnoconfig/allyesconfig and
defconfig+CONFIG_ACPI=n.

Original-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Original-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

show more ...

ACPI, EINJ: Enhance error injection tolerance level

Some BIOSes utilize PCI MMCFG space read/write opertion to trigger
specific errors. EINJ will report errors as below when hitting such
cases:

APE

ACPI, EINJ: Enhance error injection tolerance level

Some BIOSes utilize PCI MMCFG space read/write opertion to trigger
specific errors. EINJ will report errors as below when hitting such
cases:

APEI: Can not request [mem 0x83f990a0-0x83f990a3] for APEI EINJ Trigger registers

It is because on x86 platform ACPI based PCI MMCFG logic has
reserved all MMCFG spaces so that EINJ can't reserve it again.
We already trust the ACPI/APEI code when using the EINJ interface
so it is not a big leap to also trust it to access the right
MMCFG addresses. Skip address checking to allow the access.

Signed-off-by: Chen, Gong <gong.chen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>

show more ...

x86/PCI: Constify pci_mmcfg_probes[] array

The pci_mmcfg_probes[] array is only ever read, therefore make it const.

Signed-off-by: Mathias Krause <minipli@googlemail.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helga

x86/PCI: Constify pci_mmcfg_probes[] array

The pci_mmcfg_probes[] array is only ever read, therefore make it const.

Signed-off-by: Mathias Krause <minipli@googlemail.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

show more ...

x86/PCI: Mark constants of pci_mmcfg_nvidia_mcp55() as __initconst

The constants in pci_mmcfg_nvidia_mcp55() need to be marked as __initconst
or they will remain in memory after init memory was rele

x86/PCI: Mark constants of pci_mmcfg_nvidia_mcp55() as __initconst

The constants in pci_mmcfg_nvidia_mcp55() need to be marked as __initconst
or they will remain in memory after init memory was released.

Signed-off-by: Mathias Krause <minipli@googlemail.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

show more ...