KVM: s390: vsie: fix some corner-cases when grabbing vsie pages

commit 5f230f41fdd9e799f43a699348dc572bca7159aa upstream.

We try to reuse the same vsie page when re-executing the vsie with a
given

KVM: s390: vsie: fix some corner-cases when grabbing vsie pages

commit 5f230f41fdd9e799f43a699348dc572bca7159aa upstream.

We try to reuse the same vsie page when re-executing the vsie with a
given SCB address. The result is that we use the same shadow SCB --
residing in the vsie page -- and can avoid flushing the TLB when
re-running the vsie on a CPU.

So, when we allocate a fresh vsie page, or when we reuse a vsie page for
a different SCB address -- reusing the shadow SCB in different context --
we set ihcpu=0xffff to trigger the flush.

However, after we looked up the SCB address in the radix tree, but before
we grabbed the vsie page by raising the refcount to 2, someone could reuse
the vsie page for a different SCB address, adjusting page->index and the
radix tree. In that case, we would be reusing the vsie page with a
wrong page->index.

Another corner case is that we might set the SCB address for a vsie
page, but fail the insertion into the radix tree. Whoever would reuse
that page would remove the corresponding radix tree entry -- which might
now be a valid entry pointing at another page, resulting in the wrong
vsie page getting removed from the radix tree.

Let's handle such races better, by validating that the SCB address of a
vsie page didn't change after we grabbed it (not reuse for a different
SCB; the alternative would be performing another tree lookup), and by
setting the SCB address to invalid until the insertion in the tree
succeeded (SCB addresses are aligned to 512, so ULONG_MAX is invalid).

These scenarios are rare, the effects a bit unclear, and these issues were
only found by code inspection. Let's CC stable to be safe.

Fixes: a3508fbe9dc6 ("KVM: s390: vsie: initial support for nested virtualization")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Schlameuss <schlameuss@linux.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Christoph Schlameuss <schlameuss@linux.ibm.com>
Message-ID: <20250107154344.1003072-2-david@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

show more ...

KVM: s390: Change virtual to physical address access in diag 0x258 handler

commit cad4b3d4ab1f062708fff33f44d246853f51e966 upstream.

The parameters for the diag 0x258 are real addresses, not virtua

KVM: s390: Change virtual to physical address access in diag 0x258 handler

commit cad4b3d4ab1f062708fff33f44d246853f51e966 upstream.

The parameters for the diag 0x258 are real addresses, not virtual, but
KVM was using them as virtual addresses. This only happened to work, since
the Linux kernel as a guest used to have a 1:1 mapping for physical vs
virtual addresses.

Fix KVM so that it correctly uses the addresses as real addresses.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 8ae04b8f500b ("KVM: s390: Guest's memory access functions get access registers")
Suggested-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Mueller <mimu@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Nico Boehr <nrb@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240917151904.74314-3-nrb@linux.ibm.com
Acked-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

show more ...

KVM: s390: gaccess: Check if guest address is in memslot

commit e8061f06185be0a06a73760d6526b8b0feadfe52 upstream.

Previously, access_guest_page() did not check whether the given guest
address is i

KVM: s390: gaccess: Check if guest address is in memslot

commit e8061f06185be0a06a73760d6526b8b0feadfe52 upstream.

Previously, access_guest_page() did not check whether the given guest
address is inside of a memslot. This is not a problem, since
kvm_write_guest_page/kvm_read_guest_page return -EFAULT in this case.

However, -EFAULT is also returned when copy_to/from_user fails.

When emulating a guest instruction, the address being outside a memslot
usually means that an addressing exception should be injected into the
guest.

Failure in copy_to/from_user however indicates that something is wrong
in userspace and hence should be handled there.

To be able to distinguish these two cases, return PGM_ADDRESSING in
access_guest_page() when the guest address is outside guest memory. In
access_guest_real(), populate vcpu->arch.pgm.code such that
kvm_s390_inject_prog_cond() can be used in the caller for injecting into
the guest (if applicable).

Since this adds a new return value to access_guest_page(), we need to make
sure that other callers are not confused by the new positive return value.

There are the following users of access_guest_page():
- access_guest_with_key() does the checking itself (in
guest_range_to_gpas()), so this case should never happen. Even if, the
handling is set up properly.
- access_guest_real() just passes the return code to its callers, which
are:
- read_guest_real() - see below
- write_guest_real() - see below

There are the following users of read_guest_real():
- ar_translation() in gaccess.c which already returns PGM_*
- setup_apcb10(), setup_apcb00(), setup_apcb11() in vsie.c which always
return -EFAULT on read_guest_read() nonzero return - no change
- shadow_crycb(), handle_stfle() always present this as validity, this
could be handled better but doesn't change current behaviour - no change

There are the following users of write_guest_real():
- kvm_s390_store_status_unloaded() always returns -EFAULT on
write_guest_real() failure.

Fixes: 2293897805c2 ("KVM: s390: add architecture compliant guest access functions")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Nico Boehr <nrb@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240917151904.74314-2-nrb@linux.ibm.com
Acked-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

show more ...