s390/vdso: Use standard stack frame layout

[ Upstream commit 185445c7c137822ad856aae91a41e199370cb534 ]

By default user space is compiled with standard stack frame layout and not
with the packed st

s390/vdso: Use standard stack frame layout

[ Upstream commit 185445c7c137822ad856aae91a41e199370cb534 ]

By default user space is compiled with standard stack frame layout and not
with the packed stack layout. The vdso code however inherited the
-mpacked-stack compiler option from the kernel. Remove this option to make
sure the vdso is compiled with standard stack frame layout.

This makes sure that the stack frame backchain location for vdso generated
stack frames is the same like for calling code (if compiled with default
options). This allows to manually walk stack frames without DWARF
information, like the kernel is doing it e.g. with arch_stack_walk_user().

Fixes: 4bff8cb54502 ("s390: convert to GENERIC_VDSO")
Reviewed-by: Jens Remus <jremus@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

show more ...

kbuild: unify vdso_install rules

[ Upstream commit 56769ba4b297a629148eb24d554aef72d1ddfd9e ]

Currently, there is no standard implementation for vdso_install,
leading to various issues:

1. Code d

kbuild: unify vdso_install rules

[ Upstream commit 56769ba4b297a629148eb24d554aef72d1ddfd9e ]

Currently, there is no standard implementation for vdso_install,
leading to various issues:

1. Code duplication

Many architectures duplicate similar code just for copying files
to the install destination.

Some architectures (arm, sparc, x86) create build-id symlinks,
introducing more code duplication.

2. Unintended updates of in-tree build artifacts

The vdso_install rule depends on the vdso files to install.
It may update in-tree build artifacts. This can be problematic,
as explained in commit 19514fc665ff ("arm, kbuild: make
"make install" not depend on vmlinux").

3. Broken code in some architectures

Makefile code is often copied from one architecture to another
without proper adaptation.

'make vdso_install' for parisc does not work.

'make vdso_install' for s390 installs vdso64, but not vdso32.

To address these problems, this commit introduces a generic vdso_install
rule.

Architectures that support vdso_install need to define vdso-install-y
in arch/*/Makefile. vdso-install-y lists the files to install.

For example, arch/x86/Makefile looks like this:

vdso-install-$(CONFIG_X86_64) += arch/x86/entry/vdso/vdso64.so.dbg
vdso-install-$(CONFIG_X86_X32_ABI) += arch/x86/entry/vdso/vdsox32.so.dbg
vdso-install-$(CONFIG_X86_32) += arch/x86/entry/vdso/vdso32.so.dbg
vdso-install-$(CONFIG_IA32_EMULATION) += arch/x86/entry/vdso/vdso32.so.dbg

These files will be installed to $(MODLIB)/vdso/ with the .dbg suffix,
if exists, stripped away.

vdso-install-y can optionally take the second field after the colon
separator. This is needed because some architectures install a vdso
file as a different base name.

The following is a snippet from arch/arm64/Makefile.

vdso-install-$(CONFIG_COMPAT_VDSO) += arch/arm64/kernel/vdso32/vdso.so.dbg:vdso32.so

This will rename vdso.so.dbg to vdso32.so during installation. If such
architectures change their implementation so that the base names match,
this workaround will go away.

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com> # s390
Reviewed-by: Nicolas Schier <nicolas@fjasle.eu>
Reviewed-by: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de> # parisc
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Acked-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
Stable-dep-of: fc2f5f10f9bc ("s390/vdso: Create .build-id links for unstripped vdso files")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

show more ...

s390/vdso: Generate unwind information for C modules

[ Upstream commit 10f70525365146046dddcc3d36bfaea2aee0376a ]

GDB fails to unwind vDSO functions with error message "PC not saved",
for instance

s390/vdso: Generate unwind information for C modules

[ Upstream commit 10f70525365146046dddcc3d36bfaea2aee0376a ]

GDB fails to unwind vDSO functions with error message "PC not saved",
for instance when stepping through gettimeofday().

Add -fasynchronous-unwind-tables to CFLAGS to generate .eh_frame
DWARF unwind information for the vDSO C modules.

Fixes: 4bff8cb54502 ("s390: convert to GENERIC_VDSO")
Signed-off-by: Jens Remus <jremus@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

show more ...

s390/vdso64: filter out munaligned-symbols flag for vdso

[ Upstream commit 8192a1b3807510d0ed5be1f8988c08f8d41cced9 ]

Gcc recently implemented an optimization [1] for loading symbols without
explic

s390/vdso64: filter out munaligned-symbols flag for vdso

[ Upstream commit 8192a1b3807510d0ed5be1f8988c08f8d41cced9 ]

Gcc recently implemented an optimization [1] for loading symbols without
explicit alignment, aligning with the IBM Z ELF ABI. This ABI mandates
symbols to reside on a 2-byte boundary, enabling the use of the larl
instruction. However, kernel linker scripts may still generate unaligned
symbols. To address this, a new -munaligned-symbols option has been
introduced [2] in recent gcc versions.

[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-June/622872.html
[2] https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-August/625986.html

However, when -munaligned-symbols is used in vdso code, it leads to the
following compilation error:
`.data.rel.ro.local' referenced in section `.text' of
arch/s390/kernel/vdso64/vdso64_generic.o: defined in discarded section
`.data.rel.ro.local' of arch/s390/kernel/vdso64/vdso64_generic.o

vdso linker script discards .data section to make it lightweight.
However, -munaligned-symbols in vdso object files references literal
pool and accesses _vdso_data. Hence, compile vdso code without
-munaligned-symbols. This means in the future, vdso code should deal
with alignment of newly introduced unaligned linker symbols.

Acked-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sumanth Korikkar <sumanthk@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240219132734.22881-2-sumanthk@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Stable-dep-of: 10f705253651 ("s390/vdso: Generate unwind information for C modules")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

show more ...

s390/vdso: Use standard stack frame layout

[ Upstream commit 185445c7c137822ad856aae91a41e199370cb534 ]

By default user space is compiled with standard stack frame layout and not
with the packed st

s390/vdso: Use standard stack frame layout

[ Upstream commit 185445c7c137822ad856aae91a41e199370cb534 ]

By default user space is compiled with standard stack frame layout and not
with the packed stack layout. The vdso code however inherited the
-mpacked-stack compiler option from the kernel. Remove this option to make
sure the vdso is compiled with standard stack frame layout.

This makes sure that the stack frame backchain location for vdso generated
stack frames is the same like for calling code (if compiled with default
options). This allows to manually walk stack frames without DWARF
information, like the kernel is doing it e.g. with arch_stack_walk_user().

Fixes: 4bff8cb54502 ("s390: convert to GENERIC_VDSO")
Reviewed-by: Jens Remus <jremus@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

show more ...

kbuild: unify vdso_install rules

[ Upstream commit 56769ba4b297a629148eb24d554aef72d1ddfd9e ]

Currently, there is no standard implementation for vdso_install,
leading to various issues:

1. Code d

kbuild: unify vdso_install rules

[ Upstream commit 56769ba4b297a629148eb24d554aef72d1ddfd9e ]

Currently, there is no standard implementation for vdso_install,
leading to various issues:

1. Code duplication

Many architectures duplicate similar code just for copying files
to the install destination.

Some architectures (arm, sparc, x86) create build-id symlinks,
introducing more code duplication.

2. Unintended updates of in-tree build artifacts

The vdso_install rule depends on the vdso files to install.
It may update in-tree build artifacts. This can be problematic,
as explained in commit 19514fc665ff ("arm, kbuild: make
"make install" not depend on vmlinux").

3. Broken code in some architectures

Makefile code is often copied from one architecture to another
without proper adaptation.

'make vdso_install' for parisc does not work.

'make vdso_install' for s390 installs vdso64, but not vdso32.

To address these problems, this commit introduces a generic vdso_install
rule.

Architectures that support vdso_install need to define vdso-install-y
in arch/*/Makefile. vdso-install-y lists the files to install.

For example, arch/x86/Makefile looks like this:

vdso-install-$(CONFIG_X86_64) += arch/x86/entry/vdso/vdso64.so.dbg
vdso-install-$(CONFIG_X86_X32_ABI) += arch/x86/entry/vdso/vdsox32.so.dbg
vdso-install-$(CONFIG_X86_32) += arch/x86/entry/vdso/vdso32.so.dbg
vdso-install-$(CONFIG_IA32_EMULATION) += arch/x86/entry/vdso/vdso32.so.dbg

These files will be installed to $(MODLIB)/vdso/ with the .dbg suffix,
if exists, stripped away.

vdso-install-y can optionally take the second field after the colon
separator. This is needed because some architectures install a vdso
file as a different base name.

The following is a snippet from arch/arm64/Makefile.

vdso-install-$(CONFIG_COMPAT_VDSO) += arch/arm64/kernel/vdso32/vdso.so.dbg:vdso32.so

This will rename vdso.so.dbg to vdso32.so during installation. If such
architectures change their implementation so that the base names match,
this workaround will go away.

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com> # s390
Reviewed-by: Nicolas Schier <nicolas@fjasle.eu>
Reviewed-by: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de> # parisc
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Acked-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
Stable-dep-of: fc2f5f10f9bc ("s390/vdso: Create .build-id links for unstripped vdso files")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

show more ...

s390/vdso: Generate unwind information for C modules

[ Upstream commit 10f70525365146046dddcc3d36bfaea2aee0376a ]

GDB fails to unwind vDSO functions with error message "PC not saved",
for instance

s390/vdso: Generate unwind information for C modules

[ Upstream commit 10f70525365146046dddcc3d36bfaea2aee0376a ]

GDB fails to unwind vDSO functions with error message "PC not saved",
for instance when stepping through gettimeofday().

Add -fasynchronous-unwind-tables to CFLAGS to generate .eh_frame
DWARF unwind information for the vDSO C modules.

Fixes: 4bff8cb54502 ("s390: convert to GENERIC_VDSO")
Signed-off-by: Jens Remus <jremus@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

show more ...

s390/vdso64: filter out munaligned-symbols flag for vdso

[ Upstream commit 8192a1b3807510d0ed5be1f8988c08f8d41cced9 ]

Gcc recently implemented an optimization [1] for loading symbols without
explic

s390/vdso64: filter out munaligned-symbols flag for vdso

[ Upstream commit 8192a1b3807510d0ed5be1f8988c08f8d41cced9 ]

Gcc recently implemented an optimization [1] for loading symbols without
explicit alignment, aligning with the IBM Z ELF ABI. This ABI mandates
symbols to reside on a 2-byte boundary, enabling the use of the larl
instruction. However, kernel linker scripts may still generate unaligned
symbols. To address this, a new -munaligned-symbols option has been
introduced [2] in recent gcc versions.

[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-June/622872.html
[2] https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-August/625986.html

However, when -munaligned-symbols is used in vdso code, it leads to the
following compilation error:
`.data.rel.ro.local' referenced in section `.text' of
arch/s390/kernel/vdso64/vdso64_generic.o: defined in discarded section
`.data.rel.ro.local' of arch/s390/kernel/vdso64/vdso64_generic.o

vdso linker script discards .data section to make it lightweight.
However, -munaligned-symbols in vdso object files references literal
pool and accesses _vdso_data. Hence, compile vdso code without
-munaligned-symbols. This means in the future, vdso code should deal
with alignment of newly introduced unaligned linker symbols.

Acked-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sumanth Korikkar <sumanthk@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240219132734.22881-2-sumanthk@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Stable-dep-of: 10f705253651 ("s390/vdso: Generate unwind information for C modules")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

show more ...

s390/vdso: Use standard stack frame layout

[ Upstream commit 185445c7c137822ad856aae91a41e199370cb534 ]

By default user space is compiled with standard stack frame layout and not
with the packed st

s390/vdso: Use standard stack frame layout

[ Upstream commit 185445c7c137822ad856aae91a41e199370cb534 ]

By default user space is compiled with standard stack frame layout and not
with the packed stack layout. The vdso code however inherited the
-mpacked-stack compiler option from the kernel. Remove this option to make
sure the vdso is compiled with standard stack frame layout.

This makes sure that the stack frame backchain location for vdso generated
stack frames is the same like for calling code (if compiled with default
options). This allows to manually walk stack frames without DWARF
information, like the kernel is doing it e.g. with arch_stack_walk_user().

Fixes: 4bff8cb54502 ("s390: convert to GENERIC_VDSO")
Reviewed-by: Jens Remus <jremus@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

show more ...

kbuild: unify vdso_install rules

[ Upstream commit 56769ba4b297a629148eb24d554aef72d1ddfd9e ]

Currently, there is no standard implementation for vdso_install,
leading to various issues:

1. Code d

kbuild: unify vdso_install rules

[ Upstream commit 56769ba4b297a629148eb24d554aef72d1ddfd9e ]

Currently, there is no standard implementation for vdso_install,
leading to various issues:

1. Code duplication

Many architectures duplicate similar code just for copying files
to the install destination.

Some architectures (arm, sparc, x86) create build-id symlinks,
introducing more code duplication.

2. Unintended updates of in-tree build artifacts

The vdso_install rule depends on the vdso files to install.
It may update in-tree build artifacts. This can be problematic,
as explained in commit 19514fc665ff ("arm, kbuild: make
"make install" not depend on vmlinux").

3. Broken code in some architectures

Makefile code is often copied from one architecture to another
without proper adaptation.

'make vdso_install' for parisc does not work.

'make vdso_install' for s390 installs vdso64, but not vdso32.

To address these problems, this commit introduces a generic vdso_install
rule.

Architectures that support vdso_install need to define vdso-install-y
in arch/*/Makefile. vdso-install-y lists the files to install.

For example, arch/x86/Makefile looks like this:

vdso-install-$(CONFIG_X86_64) += arch/x86/entry/vdso/vdso64.so.dbg
vdso-install-$(CONFIG_X86_X32_ABI) += arch/x86/entry/vdso/vdsox32.so.dbg
vdso-install-$(CONFIG_X86_32) += arch/x86/entry/vdso/vdso32.so.dbg
vdso-install-$(CONFIG_IA32_EMULATION) += arch/x86/entry/vdso/vdso32.so.dbg

These files will be installed to $(MODLIB)/vdso/ with the .dbg suffix,
if exists, stripped away.

vdso-install-y can optionally take the second field after the colon
separator. This is needed because some architectures install a vdso
file as a different base name.

The following is a snippet from arch/arm64/Makefile.

vdso-install-$(CONFIG_COMPAT_VDSO) += arch/arm64/kernel/vdso32/vdso.so.dbg:vdso32.so

This will rename vdso.so.dbg to vdso32.so during installation. If such
architectures change their implementation so that the base names match,
this workaround will go away.

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com> # s390
Reviewed-by: Nicolas Schier <nicolas@fjasle.eu>
Reviewed-by: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de> # parisc
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Acked-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
Stable-dep-of: fc2f5f10f9bc ("s390/vdso: Create .build-id links for unstripped vdso files")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

show more ...

s390/vdso: Generate unwind information for C modules

[ Upstream commit 10f70525365146046dddcc3d36bfaea2aee0376a ]

GDB fails to unwind vDSO functions with error message "PC not saved",
for instance

s390/vdso: Generate unwind information for C modules

[ Upstream commit 10f70525365146046dddcc3d36bfaea2aee0376a ]

GDB fails to unwind vDSO functions with error message "PC not saved",
for instance when stepping through gettimeofday().

Add -fasynchronous-unwind-tables to CFLAGS to generate .eh_frame
DWARF unwind information for the vDSO C modules.

Fixes: 4bff8cb54502 ("s390: convert to GENERIC_VDSO")
Signed-off-by: Jens Remus <jremus@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

show more ...

s390/vdso64: filter out munaligned-symbols flag for vdso

[ Upstream commit 8192a1b3807510d0ed5be1f8988c08f8d41cced9 ]

Gcc recently implemented an optimization [1] for loading symbols without
explic

s390/vdso64: filter out munaligned-symbols flag for vdso

[ Upstream commit 8192a1b3807510d0ed5be1f8988c08f8d41cced9 ]

Gcc recently implemented an optimization [1] for loading symbols without
explicit alignment, aligning with the IBM Z ELF ABI. This ABI mandates
symbols to reside on a 2-byte boundary, enabling the use of the larl
instruction. However, kernel linker scripts may still generate unaligned
symbols. To address this, a new -munaligned-symbols option has been
introduced [2] in recent gcc versions.

[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-June/622872.html
[2] https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-August/625986.html

However, when -munaligned-symbols is used in vdso code, it leads to the
following compilation error:
`.data.rel.ro.local' referenced in section `.text' of
arch/s390/kernel/vdso64/vdso64_generic.o: defined in discarded section
`.data.rel.ro.local' of arch/s390/kernel/vdso64/vdso64_generic.o

vdso linker script discards .data section to make it lightweight.
However, -munaligned-symbols in vdso object files references literal
pool and accesses _vdso_data. Hence, compile vdso code without
-munaligned-symbols. This means in the future, vdso code should deal
with alignment of newly introduced unaligned linker symbols.

Acked-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sumanth Korikkar <sumanthk@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240219132734.22881-2-sumanthk@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Stable-dep-of: 10f705253651 ("s390/vdso: Generate unwind information for C modules")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

show more ...

s390/vdso: Use standard stack frame layout

[ Upstream commit 185445c7c137822ad856aae91a41e199370cb534 ]

By default user space is compiled with standard stack frame layout and not
with the packed st

s390/vdso: Use standard stack frame layout

[ Upstream commit 185445c7c137822ad856aae91a41e199370cb534 ]

By default user space is compiled with standard stack frame layout and not
with the packed stack layout. The vdso code however inherited the
-mpacked-stack compiler option from the kernel. Remove this option to make
sure the vdso is compiled with standard stack frame layout.

This makes sure that the stack frame backchain location for vdso generated
stack frames is the same like for calling code (if compiled with default
options). This allows to manually walk stack frames without DWARF
information, like the kernel is doing it e.g. with arch_stack_walk_user().

Fixes: 4bff8cb54502 ("s390: convert to GENERIC_VDSO")
Reviewed-by: Jens Remus <jremus@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

show more ...

kbuild: unify vdso_install rules

[ Upstream commit 56769ba4b297a629148eb24d554aef72d1ddfd9e ]

Currently, there is no standard implementation for vdso_install,
leading to various issues:

1. Code d

kbuild: unify vdso_install rules

[ Upstream commit 56769ba4b297a629148eb24d554aef72d1ddfd9e ]

Currently, there is no standard implementation for vdso_install,
leading to various issues:

1. Code duplication

Many architectures duplicate similar code just for copying files
to the install destination.

Some architectures (arm, sparc, x86) create build-id symlinks,
introducing more code duplication.

2. Unintended updates of in-tree build artifacts

The vdso_install rule depends on the vdso files to install.
It may update in-tree build artifacts. This can be problematic,
as explained in commit 19514fc665ff ("arm, kbuild: make
"make install" not depend on vmlinux").

3. Broken code in some architectures

Makefile code is often copied from one architecture to another
without proper adaptation.

'make vdso_install' for parisc does not work.

'make vdso_install' for s390 installs vdso64, but not vdso32.

To address these problems, this commit introduces a generic vdso_install
rule.

Architectures that support vdso_install need to define vdso-install-y
in arch/*/Makefile. vdso-install-y lists the files to install.

For example, arch/x86/Makefile looks like this:

vdso-install-$(CONFIG_X86_64) += arch/x86/entry/vdso/vdso64.so.dbg
vdso-install-$(CONFIG_X86_X32_ABI) += arch/x86/entry/vdso/vdsox32.so.dbg
vdso-install-$(CONFIG_X86_32) += arch/x86/entry/vdso/vdso32.so.dbg
vdso-install-$(CONFIG_IA32_EMULATION) += arch/x86/entry/vdso/vdso32.so.dbg

These files will be installed to $(MODLIB)/vdso/ with the .dbg suffix,
if exists, stripped away.

vdso-install-y can optionally take the second field after the colon
separator. This is needed because some architectures install a vdso
file as a different base name.

The following is a snippet from arch/arm64/Makefile.

vdso-install-$(CONFIG_COMPAT_VDSO) += arch/arm64/kernel/vdso32/vdso.so.dbg:vdso32.so

This will rename vdso.so.dbg to vdso32.so during installation. If such
architectures change their implementation so that the base names match,
this workaround will go away.

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com> # s390
Reviewed-by: Nicolas Schier <nicolas@fjasle.eu>
Reviewed-by: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de> # parisc
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Acked-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
Stable-dep-of: fc2f5f10f9bc ("s390/vdso: Create .build-id links for unstripped vdso files")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

show more ...

s390/vdso: Generate unwind information for C modules

[ Upstream commit 10f70525365146046dddcc3d36bfaea2aee0376a ]

GDB fails to unwind vDSO functions with error message "PC not saved",
for instance

s390/vdso: Generate unwind information for C modules

[ Upstream commit 10f70525365146046dddcc3d36bfaea2aee0376a ]

GDB fails to unwind vDSO functions with error message "PC not saved",
for instance when stepping through gettimeofday().

Add -fasynchronous-unwind-tables to CFLAGS to generate .eh_frame
DWARF unwind information for the vDSO C modules.

Fixes: 4bff8cb54502 ("s390: convert to GENERIC_VDSO")
Signed-off-by: Jens Remus <jremus@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

show more ...

s390/vdso64: filter out munaligned-symbols flag for vdso

[ Upstream commit 8192a1b3807510d0ed5be1f8988c08f8d41cced9 ]

Gcc recently implemented an optimization [1] for loading symbols without
explic

s390/vdso64: filter out munaligned-symbols flag for vdso

[ Upstream commit 8192a1b3807510d0ed5be1f8988c08f8d41cced9 ]

Gcc recently implemented an optimization [1] for loading symbols without
explicit alignment, aligning with the IBM Z ELF ABI. This ABI mandates
symbols to reside on a 2-byte boundary, enabling the use of the larl
instruction. However, kernel linker scripts may still generate unaligned
symbols. To address this, a new -munaligned-symbols option has been
introduced [2] in recent gcc versions.

[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-June/622872.html
[2] https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-August/625986.html

However, when -munaligned-symbols is used in vdso code, it leads to the
following compilation error:
`.data.rel.ro.local' referenced in section `.text' of
arch/s390/kernel/vdso64/vdso64_generic.o: defined in discarded section
`.data.rel.ro.local' of arch/s390/kernel/vdso64/vdso64_generic.o

vdso linker script discards .data section to make it lightweight.
However, -munaligned-symbols in vdso object files references literal
pool and accesses _vdso_data. Hence, compile vdso code without
-munaligned-symbols. This means in the future, vdso code should deal
with alignment of newly introduced unaligned linker symbols.

Acked-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sumanth Korikkar <sumanthk@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240219132734.22881-2-sumanthk@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Stable-dep-of: 10f705253651 ("s390/vdso: Generate unwind information for C modules")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

show more ...

s390/vdso: Use standard stack frame layout

[ Upstream commit 185445c7c137822ad856aae91a41e199370cb534 ]

By default user space is compiled with standard stack frame layout and not
with the packed st

s390/vdso: Use standard stack frame layout

[ Upstream commit 185445c7c137822ad856aae91a41e199370cb534 ]

By default user space is compiled with standard stack frame layout and not
with the packed stack layout. The vdso code however inherited the
-mpacked-stack compiler option from the kernel. Remove this option to make
sure the vdso is compiled with standard stack frame layout.

This makes sure that the stack frame backchain location for vdso generated
stack frames is the same like for calling code (if compiled with default
options). This allows to manually walk stack frames without DWARF
information, like the kernel is doing it e.g. with arch_stack_walk_user().

Fixes: 4bff8cb54502 ("s390: convert to GENERIC_VDSO")
Reviewed-by: Jens Remus <jremus@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

show more ...

kbuild: unify vdso_install rules

[ Upstream commit 56769ba4b297a629148eb24d554aef72d1ddfd9e ]

Currently, there is no standard implementation for vdso_install,
leading to various issues:

1. Code d

kbuild: unify vdso_install rules

[ Upstream commit 56769ba4b297a629148eb24d554aef72d1ddfd9e ]

Currently, there is no standard implementation for vdso_install,
leading to various issues:

1. Code duplication

Many architectures duplicate similar code just for copying files
to the install destination.

Some architectures (arm, sparc, x86) create build-id symlinks,
introducing more code duplication.

2. Unintended updates of in-tree build artifacts

The vdso_install rule depends on the vdso files to install.
It may update in-tree build artifacts. This can be problematic,
as explained in commit 19514fc665ff ("arm, kbuild: make
"make install" not depend on vmlinux").

3. Broken code in some architectures

Makefile code is often copied from one architecture to another
without proper adaptation.

'make vdso_install' for parisc does not work.

'make vdso_install' for s390 installs vdso64, but not vdso32.

To address these problems, this commit introduces a generic vdso_install
rule.

Architectures that support vdso_install need to define vdso-install-y
in arch/*/Makefile. vdso-install-y lists the files to install.

For example, arch/x86/Makefile looks like this:

vdso-install-$(CONFIG_X86_64) += arch/x86/entry/vdso/vdso64.so.dbg
vdso-install-$(CONFIG_X86_X32_ABI) += arch/x86/entry/vdso/vdsox32.so.dbg
vdso-install-$(CONFIG_X86_32) += arch/x86/entry/vdso/vdso32.so.dbg
vdso-install-$(CONFIG_IA32_EMULATION) += arch/x86/entry/vdso/vdso32.so.dbg

These files will be installed to $(MODLIB)/vdso/ with the .dbg suffix,
if exists, stripped away.

vdso-install-y can optionally take the second field after the colon
separator. This is needed because some architectures install a vdso
file as a different base name.

The following is a snippet from arch/arm64/Makefile.

vdso-install-$(CONFIG_COMPAT_VDSO) += arch/arm64/kernel/vdso32/vdso.so.dbg:vdso32.so

This will rename vdso.so.dbg to vdso32.so during installation. If such
architectures change their implementation so that the base names match,
this workaround will go away.

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com> # s390
Reviewed-by: Nicolas Schier <nicolas@fjasle.eu>
Reviewed-by: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de> # parisc
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Acked-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
Stable-dep-of: fc2f5f10f9bc ("s390/vdso: Create .build-id links for unstripped vdso files")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

show more ...

s390/vdso: Generate unwind information for C modules

[ Upstream commit 10f70525365146046dddcc3d36bfaea2aee0376a ]

GDB fails to unwind vDSO functions with error message "PC not saved",
for instance

s390/vdso: Generate unwind information for C modules

[ Upstream commit 10f70525365146046dddcc3d36bfaea2aee0376a ]

GDB fails to unwind vDSO functions with error message "PC not saved",
for instance when stepping through gettimeofday().

Add -fasynchronous-unwind-tables to CFLAGS to generate .eh_frame
DWARF unwind information for the vDSO C modules.

Fixes: 4bff8cb54502 ("s390: convert to GENERIC_VDSO")
Signed-off-by: Jens Remus <jremus@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

show more ...

s390/vdso64: filter out munaligned-symbols flag for vdso

[ Upstream commit 8192a1b3807510d0ed5be1f8988c08f8d41cced9 ]

Gcc recently implemented an optimization [1] for loading symbols without
explic

s390/vdso64: filter out munaligned-symbols flag for vdso

[ Upstream commit 8192a1b3807510d0ed5be1f8988c08f8d41cced9 ]

Gcc recently implemented an optimization [1] for loading symbols without
explicit alignment, aligning with the IBM Z ELF ABI. This ABI mandates
symbols to reside on a 2-byte boundary, enabling the use of the larl
instruction. However, kernel linker scripts may still generate unaligned
symbols. To address this, a new -munaligned-symbols option has been
introduced [2] in recent gcc versions.

[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-June/622872.html
[2] https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-August/625986.html

However, when -munaligned-symbols is used in vdso code, it leads to the
following compilation error:
`.data.rel.ro.local' referenced in section `.text' of
arch/s390/kernel/vdso64/vdso64_generic.o: defined in discarded section
`.data.rel.ro.local' of arch/s390/kernel/vdso64/vdso64_generic.o

vdso linker script discards .data section to make it lightweight.
However, -munaligned-symbols in vdso object files references literal
pool and accesses _vdso_data. Hence, compile vdso code without
-munaligned-symbols. This means in the future, vdso code should deal
with alignment of newly introduced unaligned linker symbols.

Acked-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sumanth Korikkar <sumanthk@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240219132734.22881-2-sumanthk@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Stable-dep-of: 10f705253651 ("s390/vdso: Generate unwind information for C modules")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

show more ...

s390/vdso: Use standard stack frame layout

[ Upstream commit 185445c7c137822ad856aae91a41e199370cb534 ]

By default user space is compiled with standard stack frame layout and not
with the packed st

s390/vdso: Use standard stack frame layout

[ Upstream commit 185445c7c137822ad856aae91a41e199370cb534 ]

By default user space is compiled with standard stack frame layout and not
with the packed stack layout. The vdso code however inherited the
-mpacked-stack compiler option from the kernel. Remove this option to make
sure the vdso is compiled with standard stack frame layout.

This makes sure that the stack frame backchain location for vdso generated
stack frames is the same like for calling code (if compiled with default
options). This allows to manually walk stack frames without DWARF
information, like the kernel is doing it e.g. with arch_stack_walk_user().

Fixes: 4bff8cb54502 ("s390: convert to GENERIC_VDSO")
Reviewed-by: Jens Remus <jremus@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

show more ...

kbuild: unify vdso_install rules

[ Upstream commit 56769ba4b297a629148eb24d554aef72d1ddfd9e ]

Currently, there is no standard implementation for vdso_install,
leading to various issues:

1. Code d

kbuild: unify vdso_install rules

[ Upstream commit 56769ba4b297a629148eb24d554aef72d1ddfd9e ]

Currently, there is no standard implementation for vdso_install,
leading to various issues:

1. Code duplication

Many architectures duplicate similar code just for copying files
to the install destination.

Some architectures (arm, sparc, x86) create build-id symlinks,
introducing more code duplication.

2. Unintended updates of in-tree build artifacts

The vdso_install rule depends on the vdso files to install.
It may update in-tree build artifacts. This can be problematic,
as explained in commit 19514fc665ff ("arm, kbuild: make
"make install" not depend on vmlinux").

3. Broken code in some architectures

Makefile code is often copied from one architecture to another
without proper adaptation.

'make vdso_install' for parisc does not work.

'make vdso_install' for s390 installs vdso64, but not vdso32.

To address these problems, this commit introduces a generic vdso_install
rule.

Architectures that support vdso_install need to define vdso-install-y
in arch/*/Makefile. vdso-install-y lists the files to install.

For example, arch/x86/Makefile looks like this:

vdso-install-$(CONFIG_X86_64) += arch/x86/entry/vdso/vdso64.so.dbg
vdso-install-$(CONFIG_X86_X32_ABI) += arch/x86/entry/vdso/vdsox32.so.dbg
vdso-install-$(CONFIG_X86_32) += arch/x86/entry/vdso/vdso32.so.dbg
vdso-install-$(CONFIG_IA32_EMULATION) += arch/x86/entry/vdso/vdso32.so.dbg

These files will be installed to $(MODLIB)/vdso/ with the .dbg suffix,
if exists, stripped away.

vdso-install-y can optionally take the second field after the colon
separator. This is needed because some architectures install a vdso
file as a different base name.

The following is a snippet from arch/arm64/Makefile.

vdso-install-$(CONFIG_COMPAT_VDSO) += arch/arm64/kernel/vdso32/vdso.so.dbg:vdso32.so

This will rename vdso.so.dbg to vdso32.so during installation. If such
architectures change their implementation so that the base names match,
this workaround will go away.

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com> # s390
Reviewed-by: Nicolas Schier <nicolas@fjasle.eu>
Reviewed-by: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de> # parisc
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Acked-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
Stable-dep-of: fc2f5f10f9bc ("s390/vdso: Create .build-id links for unstripped vdso files")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

show more ...

s390/vdso: Generate unwind information for C modules

[ Upstream commit 10f70525365146046dddcc3d36bfaea2aee0376a ]

GDB fails to unwind vDSO functions with error message "PC not saved",
for instance

s390/vdso: Generate unwind information for C modules

[ Upstream commit 10f70525365146046dddcc3d36bfaea2aee0376a ]

GDB fails to unwind vDSO functions with error message "PC not saved",
for instance when stepping through gettimeofday().

Add -fasynchronous-unwind-tables to CFLAGS to generate .eh_frame
DWARF unwind information for the vDSO C modules.

Fixes: 4bff8cb54502 ("s390: convert to GENERIC_VDSO")
Signed-off-by: Jens Remus <jremus@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

show more ...

s390/vdso64: filter out munaligned-symbols flag for vdso

[ Upstream commit 8192a1b3807510d0ed5be1f8988c08f8d41cced9 ]

Gcc recently implemented an optimization [1] for loading symbols without
explic

s390/vdso64: filter out munaligned-symbols flag for vdso

[ Upstream commit 8192a1b3807510d0ed5be1f8988c08f8d41cced9 ]

Gcc recently implemented an optimization [1] for loading symbols without
explicit alignment, aligning with the IBM Z ELF ABI. This ABI mandates
symbols to reside on a 2-byte boundary, enabling the use of the larl
instruction. However, kernel linker scripts may still generate unaligned
symbols. To address this, a new -munaligned-symbols option has been
introduced [2] in recent gcc versions.

[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-June/622872.html
[2] https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-August/625986.html

However, when -munaligned-symbols is used in vdso code, it leads to the
following compilation error:
`.data.rel.ro.local' referenced in section `.text' of
arch/s390/kernel/vdso64/vdso64_generic.o: defined in discarded section
`.data.rel.ro.local' of arch/s390/kernel/vdso64/vdso64_generic.o

vdso linker script discards .data section to make it lightweight.
However, -munaligned-symbols in vdso object files references literal
pool and accesses _vdso_data. Hence, compile vdso code without
-munaligned-symbols. This means in the future, vdso code should deal
with alignment of newly introduced unaligned linker symbols.

Acked-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sumanth Korikkar <sumanthk@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240219132734.22881-2-sumanthk@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Stable-dep-of: 10f705253651 ("s390/vdso: Generate unwind information for C modules")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

show more ...

s390/vdso: Use standard stack frame layout

[ Upstream commit 185445c7c137822ad856aae91a41e199370cb534 ]

By default user space is compiled with standard stack frame layout and not
with the packed st

s390/vdso: Use standard stack frame layout

[ Upstream commit 185445c7c137822ad856aae91a41e199370cb534 ]

By default user space is compiled with standard stack frame layout and not
with the packed stack layout. The vdso code however inherited the
-mpacked-stack compiler option from the kernel. Remove this option to make
sure the vdso is compiled with standard stack frame layout.

This makes sure that the stack frame backchain location for vdso generated
stack frames is the same like for calling code (if compiled with default
options). This allows to manually walk stack frames without DWARF
information, like the kernel is doing it e.g. with arch_stack_walk_user().

Fixes: 4bff8cb54502 ("s390: convert to GENERIC_VDSO")
Reviewed-by: Jens Remus <jremus@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

show more ...