docs: add some directories to the main documentation indexThe contents of those directories were orphaned at the documentationbody.While those directories could likely be moved to be inside some
docs: add some directories to the main documentation indexThe contents of those directories were orphaned at the documentationbody.While those directories could likely be moved to be inside some guide,I'm opting to just adding their indexes to the main one, removing the:orphan: and adding the SPDX header.For the drivers, the rationale is that the documentation containsa mix of Kernelspace, uAPI and admin-guide. So, better to keep them onseparate directories, as we've be doing with similar subsystem-specificdocs that were not split yet.For the others, well... I'm too lazy to do the move. Also, itseems to make sense to keep at least some of those at the maindir (like kbuild, for example). In any case, a latter patchcould do the move.Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@kernel.org>Acked-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
show more ...
docs: netlabel: convert docs to ReST and rename to *.rstConvert netlabel documentation to ReST.This was trivial: just add proper title markups.At its new index.rst, let's add a :orphan: while t
docs: netlabel: convert docs to ReST and rename to *.rstConvert netlabel documentation to ReST.This was trivial: just add proper title markups.At its new index.rst, let's add a :orphan: while this is not linked tothe main index.rst file, in order to avoid build warnings.Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@kernel.org>Acked-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Drop all 00-INDEX files from Documentation/This is a respin with a wider audience (all that get_maintainer returned)and I know this spams a *lot* of people. Not sure what would be the correctway,
Drop all 00-INDEX files from Documentation/This is a respin with a wider audience (all that get_maintainer returned)and I know this spams a *lot* of people. Not sure what would be the correctway, so my apologies for ruining your inbox.The 00-INDEX files are supposed to give a summary of all files presentin a directory, but these files are horribly out of date and theirusefulness is brought into question. Often a simple "ls" would revealthe same information as the filenames are generally quite descriptive asa short introduction to what the file covers (it should not surpriseanyone what Documentation/sched/sched-design-CFS.txt covers)A few years back it was mentioned that these files were no longer reallyneeded, and they have since then grown further out of date, so perhapsit is time to just throw them out.A short status yields the following _outdated_ 00-INDEX files, firstcounter is files listed in 00-INDEX but missing in the directory, lastis files present but not listed in 00-INDEX.List of outdated 00-INDEX:Documentation: (4/10)Documentation/sysctl: (0/1)Documentation/timers: (1/0)Documentation/blockdev: (3/1)Documentation/w1/slaves: (0/1)Documentation/locking: (0/1)Documentation/devicetree: (0/5)Documentation/power: (1/1)Documentation/powerpc: (0/5)Documentation/arm: (1/0)Documentation/x86: (0/9)Documentation/x86/x86_64: (1/1)Documentation/scsi: (4/4)Documentation/filesystems: (2/9)Documentation/filesystems/nfs: (0/2)Documentation/cgroup-v1: (0/2)Documentation/kbuild: (0/4)Documentation/spi: (1/0)Documentation/virtual/kvm: (1/0)Documentation/scheduler: (0/2)Documentation/fb: (0/1)Documentation/block: (0/1)Documentation/networking: (6/37)Documentation/vm: (1/3)Then there are 364 subdirectories in Documentation/ with several files thatare missing 00-INDEX alltogether (and another 120 with a single file and no00-INDEX).I don't really have an opinion to whether or not we /should/ have 00-INDEX,but the above 00-INDEX should either be removed or be kept up to date. Ifwe should keep the files, I can try to keep them updated, but I rather notif we just want to delete them anyway.As a starting point, remove all index-files and references to 00-INDEX andsee where the discussion is going.Signed-off-by: Henrik Austad <henrik@austad.us>Acked-by: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>Just-do-it-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>Reviewed-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>Acked-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>Acked-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>Cc: [Almost everybody else]Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Documentation/: it's -> its where appropriateFix obvious cases of "it's" being used when "its" was meant.Signed-off-by: Francis Galiegue <fgaliegue@gmail.com>Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xeno
Documentation/: it's -> its where appropriateFix obvious cases of "it's" being used when "its" was meant.Signed-off-by: Francis Galiegue <fgaliegue@gmail.com>Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
Fix occurrences of "the the "Signed-off-by: Michael Opdenacker <michael@free-electrons.com>Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
[NetLabel]: documentationDocumentation for the NetLabel system, this includes a basic overviewof how NetLabel works, how LSM developers can integrate it into theirfavorite LSM, as well as documen
[NetLabel]: documentationDocumentation for the NetLabel system, this includes a basic overviewof how NetLabel works, how LSM developers can integrate it into theirfavorite LSM, as well as documentation on the CIPSO related sysctlvariables. Also, due to the difficulty of finding expired IETFdrafts, I am including the IETF CIPSO draft that is the basis of theNetLabel CIPSO implementation.Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul.moore@hp.com>Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>