1Subject: Re: [PATCH][CFT] bring ARM memory layout in line with the documented behaviour 2From: "Anders Larsen" <alarsen@rea.de> 3Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2003 14:15:21 +0200 4To: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de> 5 6... 7>I still see references to _armboot_start, _armboot_end_data, and 8>_armboot_end - which role do these play now? Can we get rid of them? 9> 10>How are they (should they be) set in your memory map above? 11 12_armboot_start contains the value of CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE (0xA07E0000); it seems 13CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE and _armboot_start are both used for the same purpose in 14different parts of the (ARM) code. 15Furthermore, the startup code (cpu/<arm>/start.S) internally uses 16another variable (_TEXT_BASE) with the same content as _armboot_start. 17I agree that this mess should be cleaned up. 18