1 /*
2  * Block node graph modifications tests
3  *
4  * Copyright (c) 2019 Virtuozzo International GmbH. All rights reserved.
5  *
6  * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
7  * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
8  * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
9  * (at your option) any later version.
10  *
11  * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
12  * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
13  * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
14  * GNU General Public License for more details.
15  *
16  * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
17  * along with this program.  If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
18  *
19  */
20 
21 #include "qemu/osdep.h"
22 #include "qapi/error.h"
23 #include "qemu/main-loop.h"
24 #include "block/block_int.h"
25 #include "sysemu/block-backend.h"
26 
27 static BlockDriver bdrv_pass_through = {
28     .format_name = "pass-through",
29     .bdrv_child_perm = bdrv_default_perms,
30 };
31 
32 static void no_perm_default_perms(BlockDriverState *bs, BdrvChild *c,
33                                          BdrvChildRole role,
34                                          BlockReopenQueue *reopen_queue,
35                                          uint64_t perm, uint64_t shared,
36                                          uint64_t *nperm, uint64_t *nshared)
37 {
38     *nperm = 0;
39     *nshared = BLK_PERM_ALL;
40 }
41 
42 static BlockDriver bdrv_no_perm = {
43     .format_name = "no-perm",
44     .bdrv_child_perm = no_perm_default_perms,
45 };
46 
47 static BlockDriverState *no_perm_node(const char *name)
48 {
49     return bdrv_new_open_driver(&bdrv_no_perm, name, BDRV_O_RDWR, &error_abort);
50 }
51 
52 static BlockDriverState *pass_through_node(const char *name)
53 {
54     return bdrv_new_open_driver(&bdrv_pass_through, name,
55                                 BDRV_O_RDWR, &error_abort);
56 }
57 
58 /*
59  * test_update_perm_tree
60  *
61  * When checking node for a possibility to update permissions, it's subtree
62  * should be correctly checked too. New permissions for each node should be
63  * calculated and checked in context of permissions of other nodes. If we
64  * check new permissions of the node only in context of old permissions of
65  * its neighbors, we can finish up with wrong permission graph.
66  *
67  * This test firstly create the following graph:
68  *                                +--------+
69  *                                |  root  |
70  *                                +--------+
71  *                                    |
72  *                                    | perm: write, read
73  *                                    | shared: except write
74  *                                    v
75  *  +-------------------+           +----------------+
76  *  | passtrough filter |---------->|  null-co node  |
77  *  +-------------------+           +----------------+
78  *
79  *
80  * and then, tries to append filter under node. Expected behavior: fail.
81  * Otherwise we'll get the following picture, with two BdrvChild'ren, having
82  * write permission to one node, without actually sharing it.
83  *
84  *                     +--------+
85  *                     |  root  |
86  *                     +--------+
87  *                         |
88  *                         | perm: write, read
89  *                         | shared: except write
90  *                         v
91  *                +-------------------+
92  *                | passtrough filter |
93  *                +-------------------+
94  *                       |   |
95  *     perm: write, read |   | perm: write, read
96  *  shared: except write |   | shared: except write
97  *                       v   v
98  *                +----------------+
99  *                |  null co node  |
100  *                +----------------+
101  */
102 static void test_update_perm_tree(void)
103 {
104     int ret;
105 
106     BlockBackend *root = blk_new(qemu_get_aio_context(),
107                                  BLK_PERM_WRITE | BLK_PERM_CONSISTENT_READ,
108                                  BLK_PERM_ALL & ~BLK_PERM_WRITE);
109     BlockDriverState *bs = no_perm_node("node");
110     BlockDriverState *filter = pass_through_node("filter");
111 
112     blk_insert_bs(root, bs, &error_abort);
113 
114     bdrv_attach_child(filter, bs, "child", &child_of_bds,
115                       BDRV_CHILD_FILTERED | BDRV_CHILD_PRIMARY, &error_abort);
116 
117     ret = bdrv_append(filter, bs, NULL);
118     g_assert_cmpint(ret, <, 0);
119 
120     blk_unref(root);
121 }
122 
123 /*
124  * test_should_update_child
125  *
126  * Test that bdrv_replace_node, and concretely should_update_child
127  * do the right thing, i.e. not creating loops on the graph.
128  *
129  * The test does the following:
130  * 1. initial graph:
131  *
132  *   +------+          +--------+
133  *   | root |          | filter |
134  *   +------+          +--------+
135  *      |                  |
136  *  root|            target|
137  *      v                  v
138  *   +------+          +--------+
139  *   | node |<---------| target |
140  *   +------+  backing +--------+
141  *
142  * 2. Append @filter above @node. If should_update_child works correctly,
143  * it understands, that backing child of @target should not be updated,
144  * as it will create a loop on node graph. Resulting picture should
145  * be the left one, not the right:
146  *
147  *     +------+                            +------+
148  *     | root |                            | root |
149  *     +------+                            +------+
150  *        |                                   |
151  *    root|                               root|
152  *        v                                   v
153  *    +--------+   target                 +--------+   target
154  *    | filter |--------------+           | filter |--------------+
155  *    +--------+              |           +--------+              |
156  *        |                   |               |  ^                v
157  * backing|                   |        backing|  |           +--------+
158  *        v                   v               |  +-----------| target |
159  *     +------+          +--------+           v      backing +--------+
160  *     | node |<---------| target |        +------+
161  *     +------+  backing +--------+        | node |
162  *                                         +------+
163  *
164  *    (good picture)                       (bad picture)
165  *
166  */
167 static void test_should_update_child(void)
168 {
169     BlockBackend *root = blk_new(qemu_get_aio_context(), 0, BLK_PERM_ALL);
170     BlockDriverState *bs = no_perm_node("node");
171     BlockDriverState *filter = no_perm_node("filter");
172     BlockDriverState *target = no_perm_node("target");
173 
174     blk_insert_bs(root, bs, &error_abort);
175 
176     bdrv_set_backing_hd(target, bs, &error_abort);
177 
178     g_assert(target->backing->bs == bs);
179     bdrv_attach_child(filter, target, "target", &child_of_bds,
180                       BDRV_CHILD_DATA, &error_abort);
181     bdrv_append(filter, bs, &error_abort);
182     g_assert(target->backing->bs == bs);
183 
184     bdrv_unref(bs);
185     blk_unref(root);
186 }
187 
188 int main(int argc, char *argv[])
189 {
190     bdrv_init();
191     qemu_init_main_loop(&error_abort);
192 
193     g_test_init(&argc, &argv, NULL);
194 
195     g_test_add_func("/bdrv-graph-mod/update-perm-tree", test_update_perm_tree);
196     g_test_add_func("/bdrv-graph-mod/should-update-child",
197                     test_should_update_child);
198 
199     return g_test_run();
200 }
201